Amazon.com Widgets

December 2007 Archives

Sunday, December 30, 2007

Cambridge, Massachusetts, the city that banned the Boy Scouts from collecting goods for the troops at polling places, has once again shown where their true political loyalties lie -- with our nation's enemies.

Omar Bandar, a Special Assistant to the Mayor, was a member of the Cambridge Peace Commission's recent trip called the Cambridge-Bethlehem People-to-People project -- in which the visitors sweated it through the Israeli border, and some (or was it all?) hooked up with and took training from the International Solidarity Movement and played push and shove with Israeli soldiers whose time is supposed to spent protecting their people from terrorists, not playing catch and release with geriatric pinkos trying to relive the good old days. Was Bandar on the City's dime or taking vacation time? Was the trip in any way paid for with City funds? Some still sane Cantabrigians would like to know.

Yes, Cambridge has its own "Peace Commission", and its ties with the ISM run far. You may remember this announcement from over four years ago now to come protest the ISM's use of the Commission's office in Cambridge.

The trip was quite, "inspiriting" for Bandar. I'm all for journeys of personal discovery. Self-financed I hope.

The group knew its purpose was illicit, as they had to slither in like sneaks. Readers will again recall my noting JVP's Marty Federman's journal entries home (see: Marty's Adventures in Wonderland and It's Spelled S-O-L-O-M-O-N-I-A) from the trip. At the time it was simply noted as a "Cambridge group," but now more details of the official and organized nature of the trip have come to light.

Imagine, an official delegation from the City of Cambridge skulking into a friendly country like a bunch thieves. Their own consciences belie the peaceful nature of their mission. Delegate Skip Schiel blogged extensively about the trip. Those interested can start with his November archive. Details of crashing at the ISM's place are interesting. In a comment he exposes the delicate nature of much of the information:

you know well how delicate this matter of truth and confidentiality is. the guidelines were fuzzy for me, i tried to adhere to them. i erased some of the more personal and potentially damaging remarks.

Damaging? What are they hiding?

Schiel teaches photography at the Cambridge Center for Adult Education. An upcoming lecture of his is entitled: The Hydropolitics of Israel and Palestine. What photography course would be complete without a little "evil Israelis are dehydrating the innocent Palestinians"-style propaganda? The lecture is overpriced at $2.

Another familiar delegate was Richard Colbath-Hess, one of the organizers, along with Marty Federman, of the recent Israel-Apartheid Sabeel street rally. Video here. Colbath-Hess was apparently quite a hero in the pushing and shoving "peace protest" at highway 443 near Bil'in. According to Schiel's blog:

Rick performed nobly and courageously, using his height and bulk well. I often noticed him in the midst of the action, his red cap, blue jacket, and body size conspicuous. Perhaps his years of work with union organizing has emboldened him.

Here are videos of these brave peaceful Cantabrigians at work. Colbath-Hess is particularly obvious in his red hat and blue shirt (this is ISM stuff -- note their expansive definition of the term "non-violence"):

Here's another:

Schiel has many fine photos as well as a gallery. You must understand what a sad joke this is. Foreigners visit, put themselves under the command of local Arab leaders and involve themselves in provoking and providing cover for those who provoke the Israeli soldiers -- soldiers who are far more disciplined than to treat them as they probably deserve. Even reading Schiel's description shows that what happens amounts to catch and release by soldiers too busy to bother holding self-important activists for any length of time (It plays into the terrorist strategy no matter what happens, because if they arrest and prosecute it burdens the system with legal costs and wasted resources).

The list of delegates I've seen was: Kathy and John Roberts, Richard Colbath-Hess, Grove Harris, Marty Federman, Gail Epstein, Cathy Hoffman, Phyllis Bretholtz, Marla Erlien, Eva Moseley, Skip Schiel, Raymond Bandar and Anthana Luff, Marie-Helene Gold and Omar Bandar, though the total was reported in one place as "15 Delegates including 4 Peace Commission people." The Boston Globe gave the group a mostly puff write-up: In Bethlehem, a bond is born, though the paper did let Nancy Kaufman, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston, get a statement in. That left the delegates none too pleased.

This trip was really a disgrace, and the fact that any sort of city resources were used for it is even more disgraceful. Readers here will not need any further reminders of why the wall runs near Bethlehem -- Bethlehem was the launching pad of choice for Palestinian Arab terrorists (CAMERA has a number of articles on the city -- readers are encouraged to use the comments to provide more links to resources). The wall is there to save lives. Period. And it is succeeding. In fact, the violence is down to such an extent that by all accounts, Bethlehem had the best tourist season it had in years this season -- no thanks to the Cambridge Peace Commission.

The group is scheduled to present their report at 6:30 to 8:30 pm, January 16, 2008 at the Cambridge Senior Center.

Update: Welcome Boston.com readers.

In a little item at the Boston Globe entitled, The overlooked issues of 2007, columnist H.D.S. Greenway has a surprising entry -- surprising because the general twist of his views is rarely surprising at all, usually lining up with the Globe's left of center conventional take that most often includes a scowl and a wagging finger for the Jewish State:

We all know the Israel of wars, oppression, and precarious security, but what about Israel of the humming economy with 90 Israel-related companies on NASDAQ? What about Israeli films garnishing honors around the world: "Jellyfish" and "The Band's Visit" at Cannes, "Beaufort" in Berlin, "My Father My Lord" in Tribeca, "Sweet Mud" at Sundance, and "Aviva, My Love" in Shanghai?

What of Israeli solar power in California that has been saving 2 million barrels of oil annually for nearly 20 years? What of Arava Valley high-tech agriculture, with exports exceeding $100 million? Natafim, the drip irrigation system patented by Kibbutz Hatzerim, is now a multinational conglomerate selling millions of systems throughout the world. What of the Israel that is taking in Darfur refugees, and what of the first Israeli-initiated UN resolution, calling upon countries to share agricultural technology with developing countries, adopted overwhelmingly this month?

It's this other Israel that's underreported.

A few days ago the Iranian propaganda outlet Press TV used this spoof image (created by the brilliantly satirical website People's Cube) ...

iranlovesjews.jpg

...to prove that reports of 40 Iranian Jews emigrating to Israel were "lies spread by the Zionist hegemony."

From Press TV's article "Iranian Jews reject emigration report"

The Iranian Jewish community has dismissed fraudulent reports claiming the organized secret emigration of 40 Iranian Jews to Israel.

In a Wednesday statement the Jewish community denounced reports by foreign news outlets on the mass emigration of Iranian Jews describing it as a misinformation campaign.

"Considering the Jewish community's comfortable living conditions in Iran and its deep common cultural roots with the followers of other religions in the country, Iranian Jews would never consider organized emigration," the statement declared.

Moris Motamed, the representative of the Jewish community in the Iranian Parliament and Siamak Mare-Sedq, the chairman of Tehran's Jews Assembly said propaganda campaigns against Iran would never manipulate the Jewish community.

Two days later, PressTV realized that they were caught propagandizing, lying and manipulating the Jewish community. They replaced the image with something less absurd. The People's Cube, wise to the ways of propagandists, expected them to do that and made a screen capture of the photo and article "for historical purposes."

From the Peoples Cube open letter to the Islamic Republic of Iran

Dear Iranian Mullahs! While our satirical website and your Propaganda Directorate deal in the same trade of making up facts and exaggerating reality, we are different in that we can recognize a spoof - but you apparently can't. On Dec. 27, 2007 you used our spoof image on your propaganda website to illustrate a "true" statement that Jews are welcome in Iran and that Western reports about mass emigration of Iranian Jews are "lies spread by the Zionist hegemony."

The spoof image in question first appeared in 2005, in our parody called Israel Dismantles; World's Problems End, which revealed the absurdity of demands to dismantle Israel, with various nations, including Iran and Germany, celebrating the return of their long-missed Jews.

It gets better. Our Iranian friends tell us that the original Farsi-language placard says "Nuclear power is our absolute right," which means that you, dear Mullahs, used that image as a propaganda tool to advance your nuclear program - so you could threaten and maybe even annihilate the Jews in Israel. In our spoof, we changed the message of the placard to the complete opposite, making it appear improbable. To be fair, your story about Iran's love for the Jews was just as improbable, so it would seem only logical to put them together. It would, we repeat - if your goal were to publish a self-parody. That wasn't your intention, however. You only did it because you didn't know better.

Let's call it self-inflicted poetic justice.

The People's Cube wonders why the Mullahs and their supporters didn't get the joke. Could it be because Khomeini outlawed humor?

Expect a heartfelt article from the Daily Mail describing the heartbreak and humiliation suffered by Iran's propagandists.

But seriously, we have to wonder, why does the news of Iranian Jews emigrating to Israel provoke such an hysterical reaction?

Nicolas Sarkozy certainly seems to be a different type than Chirac: French president severs ties with Syria until further notice

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Sunday that his country will hold no more discussions with Syria until Damascus shows its willingness to let Lebanon elect a new president.

Lebanon's Western-backed government and pro-Syrian opposition have been unable to overcome their disagreements to follow through with the election, and many Western countries have accused Damascus of interfering in the process - a claim Syria denies.

"I will not have any more contact with the Syrians until... we have received proof of Syria's intention to let Lebanon designate a president of consensus," said Sarkozy at a press conference in Cairo after meeting with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.

France, Lebanon's former colonial ruler, has led the international effort to mediate between feuding Lebanese politicians and has consistently implored the Syrians to cooperate.

The French president spoke with Syrian President Bashar Assad as recently as the beginning of December to urge him to "facilitate" the election in Lebanon. Sarkozy sent his chief of staff, Claude Gueant, to Damascus in early November, and Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner met his Syrian counterpart Walid al-Moallem earlier that month on the sidelines of an Iraq conference in Turkey.

"France has taken the responsibility of talking with Syria," said Sarkozy. "One must recognize today that we cannot wait any longer, Syria must stop talking and now must act."...

Meanwhile, what the hell is Arlen Specter up to?: U.S. Senator says Syria's Assad is ready for peace with Israel

Syrian President Bashar Assad is ready for peace with Israel, an influential U.S. Senator said Sunday after talks with the Syrian leader.

Senator Arlen Specter said the political atmosphere in both Syria and Israel was different now and that the time was positive for resuming peace talks between the two countries, halted since 2000.

"We had a very productive meeting with Assad," Specter, a Republican from Pennsylvania, told The Associated Press after talks with the Syrian leader in Damascus.

He added that he got the impression after the meeting with Assad that the time was "very positive for productive talks between Israel and Syria."

"There is a sense that he (Assad) is ready and the Syrian public opinion is ready (for peace)," Specter said. The meeting with Assad that was also attended by Rep. Patrick Kennedy, a Rhode Island Democrat...

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Just in from the IDF:

6 tons of potassium nitrate discovered on humanitarian aid truck, disguised as sugar and marked as EU assistance.

More:

sugarbag.jpg

The IDF and Shin Bet uncovered 6.5 tons of potassium nitrate hidden in sacks that were disguised as aid from the European Union, the army announced on Saturday.

Security forces discovered the stash in the cargo of a Palestinian truck at a West Bank checkpoint earlier in December. According to the IDF, the material, hidden in sugar sacks, was planned to be used by terrorists in the Gaza Strip.

"Potassium Nitrate is a banned substance in the Gaza Strip and the Judea and Samaria region due to its use by terrorists for the manufacturing of explosives and Kassam rockets," the IDF spokesperson wrote in a statement.

"This is another example of how the terror organizations exploit the humanitarian aid that is delivered to the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip with Israel's approval," the statement read.

Update2: YNet story: Army finds explosive chemicals in EU aid bags

From Pajamas Media

Why is it that Pakistan’s extremists (who purportedly hate Musharraf and democracy) are not consistent in targeting pro-Musharraf and pro-democracy people? Why do they pick and choose?

I think the answer is apparent: in Pakistan, if you do not criticize the Islamists, you will not be targeted. Musharraf and Bhutto did criticize the Islamists and that is why they tend to end up in the jihadi cross-hairs. Nawaz Sharif, on the other hand, has long pandered to Jamat e Islami (and in the early 90’s even Bin Laden), while Mullah Diesel heads the main pro-Taliban party. There is no reason for extremists to attack these people; they are already on the same side.

The fact is that Musharraf has choked Pakistan’s political process for nearly a decade now, which has contributed significantly to the expansion of extremism.

To top it all off, the U.S. has absolutely no leverage in Pakistan...

...The second, more realistic solution is for the U.S. to openly dump Musharraf and pull itself out of any semblance of involvement in Pakistan’s internal political affairs. The U.S. needs to be in a position where it has not been in a long time with Pakistan: objective...

more realistic solution is for the U.S. to openly dump Musharraf and pull itself out of any semblance of involvement in Pakistan’s internal political affairs. The U.S. needs to be in a position where it has not been in a long time with Pakistan: objective.

As Mansoor Ijaz suggests at the National Review, the U.S. should call for Musharraf to set up an independent international investigation surrounding the killing of Ms. Bhutto.

An independent panel will likely conclude that it was the terrorists that killed Ms. Bhutto and not any elements associated with Musharraf himself.

I agree that an international investigation would be a good idea, but I don't agree that the US has "absolutely no leverage in Pakistan" or that the US should "openly dump Musharraf and pull itself out of any semblance of involvement in Pakistan’s internal political affairs"

First, we do have leverage in Pakistan; second, removing our influence from Pakistan's internal political affairs would put the world in more danger, not less, since we are, as reported here in the New York Times, "secretly" aiding Pakistan in guarding their nuclear arms.

The term "secretly guarding" as used in the New York Times is, of course, a relative term. If Ali meant the the US should "'openly' remove itself from Pakistan's affairs" in the same way, this could be a good idea.

Friday, December 28, 2007

$156M Terrorism Damage Award Thrown Out

A federal appeals court overturned a $156 million award Friday against U.S.-based Muslim activists for their involvement in the terrorist death of an American teenager in the West Bank more than a decade ago.

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the judge in the case had failed to require the parents of 17-year-old David Boim to properly show a link between the boy's death and the fundraising activities of the charities.

Because of that error, it sent the case back for a possible new trial.

Nathan Lewin, an attorney for the parents, Stanley and Joyce Boim, said an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is possible.

"This court of appeals decision is wrong, very wrong," Lewin said. "It amounts to encouragement of financial contributions to terrorist organizations."

The Boims had sued the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development; the American Muslim Society, also known as the Islamic Association for Palestine; the Quranic Literacy Institute of suburban Oak Lawn; and an alleged Hamas fundraiser.

Their son, a yeshiva student, was gunned down in 1996 while waiting with other students at a bus stop in Beit El, on the West Bank...

The Islamic Association for Palestine is the parent organization of CAIR "which was co-founded in 1994 by Nihad Awad (IAP's President), Omar Ahmad (IAP's Public Relations Director), and Ibrahim Hooper (an IAP employee)."

CAIR is breathing a huge sigh of relief tonight, and issued a breathless press release praising the decision.

In a statement, CAIR-Chicago Executive Director Ahmed Rehab said:

"Today, our nation’s great tradition of respect for the rule of law has been upheld. This landmark ruling is a strong rejection of the recent disturbing trend of political lawsuits against American Muslims who have committed no crime other than providing humanitarian aid to Palestinians.

"Pro-Israel groups are engaged in a broad-based attack against domestic humanitarian efforts to aid Palestinians living in dire circumstances under the Israeli occupation. It is reprehensible that groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) would fund and encourage lawsuits that seek to repress First Amendment-protected activities by Palestinian Americans under the guise of fighting terrorism...

They condemn the murder, but would sure like to be able to send money to "charities" like Hamas. That's the double game these guys like to play. They send the money and maintain plausible deniability while they let the other guys commit the murders. In case you've forgotten, here's video of IAP's 1989 2nd annual convention held in Kansas City, Missouri. Yeah, this video was taken in America.

But it's all just charity work.

If a Jew takes a wrong turn into Ramallah, he gets lynched. If an Arab takes a wrong turn into Tel Aviv he gets...what? Welfare? Two Arab heroes here as well: Israeli nearly lynched in Ramallah

Twenty-eight-year old Israeli ends up in Ramallah after GPS system goes haywire. Driver rescued from stone-throwing mob by two east Jerusalem residents he calls ‘his guardian angels’

And you thought your GPS system was trouble? For 28-year-old Bat Yam resident Amir Ochana flawed GPS navigation nearly proved fatal. Instead of a planned return trip to Jerusalem, Ochana’s GPS system directed him towards the West Bank City of Ramallah.

Ochana had just finished work in the Pisgat Ze’ev neighborhood of Jerusalem, and wanted to give his secretary a ride home to the Adam settlement northeast of Jerusalem. He plugged in the coordinates for a return trip to Jerusalem into his GPS system and set of on his merry way.

The Bat Yam resident recounts the horror that followed. "I ended up at an army checkpoint…and they let me through even though I was wearing a kippah and had Israeli license plates… I ended up in the center of Ramallah, stuck in traffic and surrounded by Arabs," he says. "I still didn’t realize where I was because I relied on my GPS."

Soon, however, Ochana was spotted by the local Arab residents. "One Arab merchant came up to my car and started rapping on my window….He asked me if I was Jewish and I answered ‘yes.' I immediately knew that something was wrong."

The Arab merchant then entered Ochana’s vehicle through the window, punched him in the testicles and stole his cellular phone. "He began to yell ‘a Jew, a Jew’ and other Arabs soon approached me. They stole my GPS and my other cellular phone," said Ochana.

This mugging was soon the least of Ochana’s problems, as a lynching lmost ensued afterwards. "An entire mob approached me and began to throw rocks at my car….they broke both the front and back windows….I began to cry and ask ‘why me?’" Ochana recalled.

Just as Ochana began to fear the worst, however, help came from an unexpected source. "Two Arabs came out of nowhere…One of them pulled me out of the car and asked me if I was insane. They ran with me to the Qalandiya checkpoint while we were chased by rock-pelting Arabs the entire way, and handed me over to Israeli soldiers," he recounted...

memrifranklinquote.jpg

Big round of applause for the Syrian holy man. No, seriously, he gets a big round of applause. Note the number of microphones -- including Al-Jazeera, where this aired -- think enough people are getting the message? Oh, and he says he's quoting Lyndon LaRouche. Rich.

MEMRI TV: Syrian Cleric Muhammad Sa'id Ramadhan Al-Bouti: Benjamin Franklin Called upon Americans to Deport Jews from the U.S.

Muhammad Sa'id Ramadhan Al-Bouti: We have no interest in war. We all dream about peace. But it is Israel that fans the flames of war, like Lyndon LaRouche said yesterday. I would like to conclude my speech by quoting the will that Benjamin Franklin read out loud to his American "sons" – but the sons and grandsons have torn this will to shreds. In a speech that Benjamin Franklin delivered at the committee for the drafting of the U.S. constitution in 1789, he warned the committee, and the Americans in general, of the Jewish danger to America and the world. Let me read his speech to you, translated into Arabic.

"There is a great danger threatening the United States of America. That danger is the Jewish danger. Gentlemen, in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have corrupted the morals, and lowered the level of commercial honesty. They always isolate themselves and never mix with others. Because of their feelings of persecution, they always attempt to choke the nations economically, like they did to Portugal and Spain. Since 1700 [sic.], they have been lamenting their fate. But gentlemen, if the world were to give them Palestine, which they claim along with other property, they would soon find a reason to start lamenting their fate once again. How come? Because they are vermin" – he was referring to grave-dwellers who leave their tombs to suck the blood of others. "They cannot live among their own kind. They live at the expense of Christians and others who do not belong to their race. If they are not deported from the United States by the Constitution, within a century they will be streaming into our country in such large numbers that will enable them to rule the country, destroy us, and change the form of government for which we Americans shed our blood, and for which we have sacrificed our lives, our property, and our personal freedom. If we do not deport the Jews, our children will become, within 200 years, field laborers working to feed the Jews, while the Jews will stay in the banks, gleefully rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, that if you do not deport the Jews once and for all, your children and grandchildren will curse you in your graves. The values of the Jews are not the same as those of the Americans, and they will not be the same even if they live among us for ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. The Jews will pose a danger to this country, if they are allowed in. They will destroy our institutions.

"I think I can declare this truth openly. I do not live in Germany or Europe, and so I do not need to whisper these things. We are in a country from which we want to declare who is the number one enemy lying in wait for world peace. Thank you, and may God be with you."

He's quoting a well-known and long-discredited Nazi-era fabrication of a supposed Franklin speech that never existed.

Message to Al-Jazeera: Don't crap where you eat. MEMRI: Algerian Press Declares War on 'Terrorist' Al-Jazeera over Online Poll Asking 'Do You Support Al-Qaeda's Attacks in Algeria?'

On December 12, 2007, the day after the double suicide-bombing in Algiers for which Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb claimed responsibility, Al-Jazeera TV's website aljazeera.net posted an online poll asking, "Do you support Al-Qaeda's attacks in Algeria?" After three days of voting and 30,010 responses, the results were 54.7% in support and 45.3% opposed. The Algerian press and media were unanimous in denouncing the poll, and Al-Jazeera was widely accused of supporting terrorism.

It should be noted that Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb posted a screenshot of the Al-Jazeera poll on its homepage (www.qmagreb.org ), with the caption "The Results of the Vote as Shown on Al-Jazeera!"...

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Congress has some serious doubts about selling highly advanced military technology to our good friends in Saudi Arabia, the acknowledged hub of world terrorism...

Maybe they can guess where this is heading..

Britain does it:

Spies from Britain's MI6 are thought to have held at least six meetings with key Taliban figures in order to negotiate a peace deal in Afghanistan's south-eastern Helmand province.

The revelations are an embarrassment to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who just a fortnight ago denied in the British Parliament any such talks were taking place...

Britain negotiated an earlier peace deal in October 2006, which failed. At that time British forces pulled out of Musa Qala after an agreement with tribal elders declared the area a neutral zone.

Taliban fighters responded quickly by seizing control of the surrounding district and occupying the town for most of 2007.

The Afghan Government, NATO allies and Australia are believed to have all privately chided Downing Street over the Musa Qala peace deal, labelling it a surrender to the Taliban.

They do it and so do we. A former aide admitted that terrorist and Nobel prizewinner Arafat founded Black September. Our partner in peace, current Palestinian Arab President Mahmoud Abbas was involved in the Munich Massacre:

Ma'an (Arabic) reports that a series of articles being authored by longtime Arafat aide Marwan Kanafani in Egypt's Al Ahram will say that it was Yasir Arafat himself who created the Black September organization in 1970.

Black September was behind many of the highest-profile terror attacks in the early 1970s, including the murder of Jordanian Prime Minister Wasfi Tel, the Munich Olympic massacre, the May 1972 hijacking of a Belgian airliner from Vienna, dozens of letter bombs including at one that killed an Israeli politician in London, and the murder of two US diplomats in Khartoum.

The PLO always used Black September for plausible deniability, claiming that the deadliest BSO attacks had nothing to do with them...

...And we know that the current Palestinian Arab President Mahmoud Abbas was also involved in Black September, specifically in the Munich massacre.

Is anyone surprised by these revelations? I didn't think so. Everyone knows Abbas and Arafat are terrorism personified. Everyone know that when we negotiate with terrorists, they see it as surrender.

The only people who are fooled by this implausible deniability are the Western politicians who hope to gain historical brownie points and the favor of oil-rich Gulf Arabs by re-labeling the surrender as a 'peace process'

Diplomats like Rice and Brown don't want to admit that they're surrendering to terrorists, but that's exactly what they're doing.

Some maps at Harvard's MESH site give some answers: Maps: Who has the oil?

This one is a proportional map of oil reserves:

oilmap.jpg

From the IICC: The Hate Industry: children and adolescents in the Gaza Strip kiss the corpses of terrorist-operative martyrs (shaheeds). It is part of the indoctrination to hate Israel and of the shaheed cult popular in Palestinian Authority-administered territories.

The IICC has a look at this phenomenon and more photos:

palestinian_child_b.jpg

1. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas in the Gaza Strip encourage children and adolescents to gather around the corpses of shaheeds ("martyrs for the sake of Allah") and even to kiss them, although it is not rooted in the Muslim tradition (See below, Appendix 1 ). It is part of their indoctrination to hate Israel and employ violence, and it begins at an early age in both the formal and informal educational systems, and as part of the shaheed cult popular among Palestinians in the PA-administered territories during the current confrontation with Israel . (See below, Appendix 2 ).

2. The picture on the first page shows a child kissing the corpse of a PIJ terrorist operative buried on November 25. He was Yussuf Hussein Mousa, 19, a resident of the al-Maghazi refugee camp in the central Gaza strip, who was killed in a firefight with the IDF...

...The shaheed cult during the violent confrontation with Israel has created unique burial customs. For example, the men are buried in their clothing and special care is made to cover their reproductive organs in prepration for their meeting with the 72 black-eyed virgins in paradise. There is also a myth that the grave of a shaheed gives off an especially pleasant odor...

Moses Maimonides fled intolerant Christian Europe for a more tolerant Muslim North Africa.

False.

Interesting article with the usual copious primary sources at Andrew Bostom's new blog: Maimonides and the "Meshugga" Prophet:

December 13th marked the 804th anniversary of the death of Maimonides (d. 1203, in Cairo), renowned Talmudist, philosopher, astronomer, and physician. The biography of this "second Moses," is often cited by those who would extol the purported Muslim ecumenism of the high Middle Ages—particularly in "Andalusia," or Muslim Spain, invariably accompanied by a denunciation of the fanatical intolerance of Christian Western Europe, during the same era.

A particularly egregious example of this genre of loaded comparisons was made by Amartya Sen, the Nobel laureate economist, in his recent book Identity and Violence. Sen has the temerity to proclaim, "…the Jewish Philosopher Maimonides was forced to emigrate from an intolerant Europe in the twelfth century, he found a tolerant refuge in the Arab world."

Sen’s ahistorical drivel aside, Maimonides (b. 1135, in Cordova) was but thirteen years old (in 1148) when Muslim Cordova fell into the hands of the particularly fanatical Berber Muslim Almohads, who invaded the Iberian peninsula from North Africa. Maimonides and all the dhimmi Jews in Cordova were compelled to choose between Islam and exile. Choosing the latter course, Maimonides and his family for twelve years subsequently led a nomadic life, wandering across Spain. By 1160 they crossed the Mediterranean, and settled at Fez, Morocco (also under Almohad control) where, unknown to the authorities, they hoped to pass as Muslims, while living as crypto-Jews. Maimonides’ dual life, however, became increasingly dangerous as his reputation was steadily growing, and the authorities began to inquire into the religious disposition of this highly gifted young man. He was even charged by an informer with the crime of having relapsed (apostasized) from Islam, and, but for the intercession of the poet and theologian Abu al-‘Arab al Mu’ishah, a Muslim friend, he would have suffered the fate of his colleague Judah ibn Shoshan, who had shortly before been executed on a similar charge. Given these precarious circumstances, Maimonides’ family left Fez, embarking in 1165 to Acre, then to Jerusalem, and on to Fostat (Cairo), where they settled, living once again as dhimmis, albeit under more tolerant Fatimid rule...

"No matter how hard I try, I can't convince my countrymen to see things the way I do, so they must be forced." David Landau puts the anti-democratic left on full display. Richard Landes discusses: David Landau, Oslo Logician, Asks Condi Rice to "Rape" Israel

In today’s Jewish Week, the editor Gary Rosenblatt has a shocking piece on the editor of Ha-Aretz, David Landau’s conversation with Condi Rice last September, in the build-up to Annapolis. Both the message and the language shed a harsh light on the condition of the "anti-occupation" Israeli mindset. The landscape is not pretty...

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Yeah, that's right..."you know, for kids"...

memrinahoulbee.jpg

Nahoul the bee is back, and he's sad: Hamas TV Bee, Nahoul, Weeps over "Martyred" Family and Chit-Chats with Kids on Animal Slaughtering

Following are excerpts from "Pioneers of Tomorrow," a children's show aired on Al-Aqsa TV on December 20, 2007:

Saraa, child host: Nahoul, don't you want to convey your holiday greetings on the Feast of the Sacrifice?

Nahoul, a giant bee: Convey greetings, Saraa?

Saraa: Yes.

Nahoul: Who should I convey greetings to, Saraa? Should I convey greetings to my brother, who was martyred in the first Intifada, at the hands of the Zionist Jews? Should I convey greetings to my second brother, who was martyred in the second Intifada? Should I convey greetings to my wounded brother, to my aunt, who was martyred because of the siege, or to her orphans? Who is there for me to greet, Saraa? I won't greet anyone. I am so sad, Saraa...

...Saraa: Don't be sad, Nahoul.

Nahoul: I won't even convey greetings to my mother, who suffers from diabetes, or to my father, who suffers from hepatitis C? Who should I convey greetings to, Saraa? You're rubbing salt on my wounds.

Saraa: Don't be sad, Nahoul. We can all be sacrificed for the sake of the homeland. May Allah help you. All we can say is that we place our trust in Allah against the enemies.

Nahoul: We place our trust in Allah...

memrisicksong.jpg

And here's the young co-host, singing the Hamas version of a children's song: TV Host on Hamas TV, Child Saraa Barhoum, Sings: "We Liberated Gaza by Force"

We liberated Gaza by force, not by Oslo or by Taba -
but with my steadfast people, and with its blazing fire.
We liberated Gaza by force, not by Oslo or by Taba -
but with my steadfast people, and with its blazing fire.
Rafah sings, and the Kalashnikov replies.
Rafah sings, and the Kalashnikov replies.
We, who know no fear, are the lions of the jungle.
Look how beautiful our Gaza is. We crowned it with a laurel wreath.
We have proven that with our will, we can defeat the colonialist army.
Look how beautiful our Gaza is. We crowned it with a laurel wreath.
We have proven that with our will, we can defeat the colonialist army.
We have regained our freedom through bloodshed and the wrath of fire.
We came out on the day of liberations to celebrate our pride – hurrah!
We came out on the day of liberations to celebrate our pride – hurrah!
[...]
Oh Gaza, the first stone [of the Intifada], where we celebrated our victory -
raise your sail for the sailors, and let your lighthouse illuminate the sea of blood...

Ho ho ho! Merry Christmas!

40 Iranians arrive in Israel, 200 this year, up from 65 the year before: A7: Iranian Jews Leave Their Silent Nightmare, Come Home to Israel

WaPo: Iranian Jews Arrive in Israel

The dhimmi head of the Jewish Community in Iran is claiming it's all a trick: Jewish-Iranian leader questions aliya

...Ciamak Morsathegh, who heads the Teheran Jewish Committee, claimed Wednesday that the immigrants were not Iranian because pictures broadcast on television in Israel on Tuesday did not show their faces. In Israel, the broadcasters did not show their faces because there was concern that publicity could lead to harm of Jews still in Iran.

"This is a misinformation campaign, a campaign of lies against Iran and its Jewish community. We can't confirm that 40 Iranian Jews landed in Israel," Morsathegh told The Associated Press.

A joint statement signed by Morsathegh and Morris Motamed, the only Jewish lawmaker in the Iranian parliament, also said the Iranian Jews have never been part of any "organized immigration" to Israel...

Monday, December 24, 2007

Merry Christmas, all!

I thought I'd pause a moment from deleting all those last minute solicitations from some very worthy causes that have been clogging up my inbox with requests for pre-end-of-year donations and talk about what's really important...me. Yeah, I know there are Paypal and Amazon tip boxes over there on the right, but really, cash is so...OK, cash is great, but I'm not so sure Santa carries a lot on him. So here's a list of things I hope I wake up with tomorrow morning:

Continue reading "All I Want for Christmas"

OpinionJournal has printed a remarkable op-ed piece by Newsweek editor Kenneth L. Woodward: The Plight of Bethlehem. Rarely does one this bad get past the Journal's editors. What happened? No need for a pull-quote, Woodward blames the hardships of Bethlehem's Christians on (cue ominous music) "The Wall" and not the terror that necessitated it, nor the well-documented persecution of Arab Christians by their Muslim neighbors. The Christian population was falling long before anyone even thought of a wall (in Bethlehem and all over the Muslim world).

Doesn't an editor at Newsweek have something important to do, like searching toilets for stray Korans, for instance?

The reader responses are the balm on this chafe, including comments by "The Editor." Would that be Bret Stephens? It doesn't say:

Jews who attempt to visit our holy sites in the West Bank and Gaza do so at significant risk to our lives while Christians and Muslims enjoy full, uninterrupted access to their holy sites within Israel without ever having to fear for their safety. The tragedy of Bethlehem is not the Israeli security measures that are the first responsibility of any government; it is the absence of true courage and appropriate action on the part of the Palestinian Christians and Muslims who may yearn for peace, yet continue to allow murderers to live, plot, and operate from their neighborhoods, schools and religious sites. The sanctity and peace of Bethlehem will be restored when Palestinians of all faiths find the courage and strength to stand up forcefully against the hatred, violence, and fanaticism that their brethren direct against their Jewish neighbors. In the spirit of this holy season, that should be the call that echoes from every pulpit.

America Alone indeed. 142-1. Pride.

Claudia Rosett: America vs the UN Mob

Just in case anyone thinks the folks at the UN don’t work long hours, check out the news on the UN General Assembly budget vote, held at 5:55 A.M. — on Saturday morning, no less — following “marathon talks that lasted through the night.” The result was the adoption of a record-busting $4.17 billion core budget for 2008-2009, passed by a vote of 142 to 1.

And who was that lone dissenting member state? You guessed it: as Mark Steyn has called it, America Alone.

Is that because 142 member states (including Belarus, China, Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Laos, Libya, Burma, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Venezuela, Vietnam and Zimbabwe) are right? and America is wrong?

Or is it because the UN system is structured to encourage the mob of member states to treat American money as an all-you-can-eat buffet?

American taxpayers bankroll 22%, or $917 million of this whopping biennial core budget — by far the biggest contribution of any one member state — with just a handful of other countries, including Japan and a few from the European Union, accounting for the bulk of the remainder.

This is just the core budget, of course. The UN system-wide budget is about ten times the size (and for that, the U.S. foots an even bigger portion of the bill, or about 25%), thus likely to total well over $40 billion for the same two-year stretch. Though due to a UN system growing like kudzu, and just as impenetrable, the exact numbers are almost impossible to keep up with.

And does all this money go to make a better world? In a statement to the General Assembly, the U.S. ambassador for management reform, Mark Wallace, noted that this budget contains funding for a conference dubbed Durban II, "an event noxious to my country and a disgrace in the International Community."...

Rosett's report on Durban II at NRO, here: Destination: Durban II

More on the vote from the Washington Post: General Assembly Approves UN Budget

...U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said the insistence of some members of the Group of 77, which represents 132 mainly developing countries and China, to fund a follow-up conference from the U.N.'s regular budget made it impossible for the United States to support the overall budget proposal...

...Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon expressed regret in a statement "that the resolution was not adopted by consensus, marking a break with tradition after 20 years."

"The secretary-general urges all member states to return to consensus decision-making and to demonstrate a greater sense of flexibility and compromise, beyond individual national interests and in the common cause of multilateralism for the good of humankind," the statement said...

Shut. Up.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

memrisari.jpg

MEMRI TV has posted video of some disturbing comments by the dean of Al Quds University, Sari Nusseibeh, often sold as a moderate (always a controversial appellation: search). The comments are being called racist and anti-semitic. Here's the video: Palestinian Researcher Dr. Sari Nusseibeh on the Return of Palestinian Refugees.

Anti-Racist Blog has commented here and here. Campus Watch has written about it and has circulated a letter to university presidents: U.S. Universities' Partner, Al-Quds President Nusseibeh, Makes Anti-Semitic Remarks:

...Al-Quds has partnered with several American and Canadian universities to offer programs, classes, and research opportunities. The schools involved include the University of Michigan at Dearborn, Northeastern University, York University in Ontario, Brandeis, and George Washington University. Al-Quds also receives U.S. government support.

This afternoon, I sent the email below to the heads of each of these schools. If they reply, we'll make their remarks available; they may choose to speak through the media. Most important is that they not stand for such blatant anti-Semitism from the head of an institution that is supported by the schools they lead...

The letter reads, in part:

...Given that X University has close relations with Al-Quds ( link to university web page ), I wondered if you had any public comment on the remarks of President Nusseibeh...

Harvard's James Russell has come out both guns blazing:

I, James Russell, Mashtots Professor of Armenian Studies at Harvard University, have read the statement by Sari Nusseibeh in his official capacity as President of Al Quds University: "No Jew in the world, now or in the future... will have the right... to live... in East Jerusalem" and so on. In response I declare that I refuse to teach or collaborate in any way professionally with any person having any connection whatsoever to Al Quds University, which must be regarded as an anti-Semitic and racialist entity. Furthermore I will oppose by every possible means, including prosecution under the laws of the United States, any association or cooperation of Harvard University with Al Quds. I urge all scholars and teachers of good will to join me.

Strong.

I still have a few questions. What document are they talking about in the video? Will Nusseibeh issue a clarification for the record? Is Nusseibeh actually insisting no Jew should have a right to live in a future Palestinian State (and those living there now should be expelled), or is he merely arguing that there's nothing in this document they're discussing that would allow a Jew to "demand" it? There's a feel here of a rational person trying to humor madmen and shift their positions without trying to take them out head on, and I'm not naive about Nusseibeh's "issues."

So what is it, Sari? Is there a reasonable explanation here, or have you finally been outed as a racist anti-semite? I'm not sure it matters that much anyway, since given what he clearly does say, the best Nusseibeh could do would be to come out looking relatively better, and that's not saying much.

Update: Andy Bostom emails to remind us of Nusseibeh's words of respect for "Martyr Mom" Umm Nidal Farhat:

...Propelled by this notoriety, which the larger Palestinian Muslim society clearly extolled, including “moderate” Professor Sari Nusseibah (who stated on Al-Jazeera television [Qatar], June 29, 2002, “When I hear the words of Umm Nidal, I recall the [hadith] stating that ‘Paradise lies under the feet of mothers’. All respect is due to this mother, it is due to every Palestinian mother and every female Palestinian who is a Jihad fighter on this land”)...

The top Catholic Cleric in Israel came out against Israel's Jewish character the other day -- contrary to Vatican policy which recognizes Israel as a Jewish State: Catholic cleric comes out against Jewish state

The Roman Catholic Church's top cleric in the Holy Land said Israel should not be designated a Jewish state.

Latin Patriarch Michel Sabbah came out this week against the Olmert government's demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state before peace talks can proceed.

"God made this land for all three of us so a suitable state is one who can adapt itself to the vocation of this land," said Sabbah, an Arab who was born in the northern Israeli town of Nazareth and who regularly officiates at religious events in the Palestinian Authority town of Bethlehem.

"If it's Jewish, it's not Muslim or Christian," he told reporters.

Sabbah had no word on whether a future Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip should not be allowed to favor Muslims given those territories' sanctity to Jews and Christians...

Most large and small Jewish organizations came out quickly to condemn Sabbah's words: Sabbah slammed for challenging 'Jewish state'

Two of the largest Jewish advocacy groups in the world harshly criticized the highest-ranking Catholic Church official in Jerusalem for challenging Israel's right to continue to exist as a Jewish state.

Both the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America (UOJC) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) attacked Latin Patriarch Michel Sabbah for commenting last Wednesday during his annual pre-Christmas address that Israel should abandon its Jewish character in favor of a political, normal state for Christians Muslims and Jews...

So that's UOJC and ADL. Here's the Wiesenthal Center: WIESENTHAL CENTER URGES VATICAN TO REJECT THE LATIN PATRIARCH’S "INSIDIOUS CAMPAIGN TO DE-JUDAIZE ISRAEL". Christians for Fair Witness issued a statement: Fair Witness Is Dismayed By Latin Patriarch’s Statement:

..."We must be careful to distinguish between the Jewish people and the Jewish religion. Presumably His Beatitude supports the creation of a state for the Palestinian people. Why would he deny this same fundamental right to the Jewish people?" asks Rev. Dr. Bruce Chilton, the Bernard Iddings Bell Professor of Religion at Bard College.

Sr. Ruth Lautt, Fair Witness National Director, points out "Jews, like any other people, defined in terms of a shared ethnicity, language, history, culture and/or religion, have the right to constitute an autonomous, sovereign political community. We have been very concerned about recent attacks on the legitimacy of a Jewish state. It is dismaying to see Patriarch Sabbah jump on this bandwagon and take the position that a Jewish state is somehow inherently discriminatory."...

There's a good commentary about this in yesterday's Jerusalem Post: Sabbah's Hypocrisy

...Besides the deep insult inherent in the patriarch's Christmas message, it is hypocritical, significant and damning that Sabbah did not apply his universal principle equally by demanding the de-Islamicization of his native Palestine, from which his flock continues to flee en masse...

I haven't seen anything from the AJC on this fundamentally important issue. If anyone has, a link would be appreciated.

Fatah map shows all of Israel as Palestine

fatahmap43.jpg

Fatah is planning to mark its 43rd anniversary this year with a new poster that presents all of Israel as Palestine.

Designed specifically for the occasion by Abdel Mun'em Ibrahim, the poster features a map of Israel that is entirely draped with a Palestinian keffiyeh scarf.

It also carries a drawing of a rifle as a symbol of the "armed struggle" against Israel.

The poster, which has been endorsed by the Fatah leadership, has already been posted on a number of Fatah-affiliated Web sites.

The underlying message of the poster is that Fatah, like Hamas, does not recognize Israel's existence.

The emblem is in violation of Fatah's declared policy, which envisions an independent Palestinian state alongside, and not instead of, Israel.

By including a rifle in the poster, Fatah is sending a message to the Palestinian public that it has not abandoned the option of "armed resistance," despite current peace talks with Israel.

Founded in 1965, Fatah has celebrated its anniversary over the past 14 years with major rallies in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. But it's not clear at this stage if Hamas would allow Fatah to hold a big rally in the Gaza Strip...

A picture's worth a thousand words.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

capt.sge.msh03.211207182233.photo00.photo.default-512x341.jpg
An Israeli soldier tackles a Palestinian protester dressed as Santa Claus or Father Christmas during at a protest against Israel's separation barrier in the village of Umm Salamunah near the biblical West Bank town of Bethlehem. Israeli guards beat five demonstrators during the protest on Friday, organisers said. (AFP/Musa al-Shaer)

Jaw-dropping. How do you create a disgusting photo-op just in time for Christmas? Why, send someone dressed as Santa Claus out and instigate an incident...and the press dutifully complies. Why does Hamas bother, when they have Agence France-Presse to do the work for them?

'Father Christmas' beaten in West Bank demo: organisers

BETHLEHEM, West Bank (AFP) - Israeli guards beat five demonstrators, including one dressed as Father Christmas, during a protest on Friday against Israel's separation barrier in the West Bank, organisers said.

About 50 Palestinian, Israeli and international peace activists attended the rally in the village of Um Salomona, near Bethlehem, the Biblical birthplace of Jesus that is preparing to celebrate Christmas.

Israeli border guards armed with truncheons briefly detained one activist and beat another five during the rally, the organisers told AFP, adding that one was wearing a Santa Claus costume.

An Israeli army spokesman said there had been disorder at the protest and that several demonstrators who were briefly detained were subsequently released.

Israel says the massive barrier of electric fencing, barbed wire and concrete walls built across the West Bank is needed to stop potential attackers from infiltrating the country and attacking Jewish settlements on Arab land.

WHAAAT? Israel said that? Not. The fence is for preventing terrorists from murdering people -- in Israel and yes, the disputed territories as well, and it's working. Only racists talk about "Arab land." I doubt Israel ever does. Could AFP be any more obvious in reprinting propaganda meant for nothing but inciting hatred?

The Palestinians say the project is aimed at grabbing their land and undermining the viability of their promised state.

In 2004, the International Court of Justice issued a non-binding ruling that parts of the 650-kilometre (410-mile) barrier criss-crossing the West Bank are illegal and should be torn down. Israel has vowed to complete the project.

Here's some more context for that final paragraph: The fence has saved an unknown, but significant number of lives, and kept the idea of peace from perhaps evaporating entirely.

I look forward to the no doubt forthcoming condemnation of this disgraceful stunt from some of our "friends" in the Christian Community (and no, I don't mean our real friends, who I'm sure will be as disgusted by this sort of thing -- both on the part of the press and the stage-handlers -- as I am).

Via LGF: AFP: Jews Beat Santa Claus

Are you concerned about getting your ludicrous antisemitic propaganda out to the world in time for Christmas? Not to worry! Agence France Presse is always there to help...

BTW, photographer Musa al-Shaer is a stringer who does this kind of propaganda professionally. The story is unsigned, but it appears that AFP has simply handed over the wire for terrorist use.

If there were anything to get you thinking again about the importance of finding an alternative to the petroleum economy, it would be this headline: Venezuelan leader Chavez presides over oil summit in Cuba

Krista Johnson was the Sabeel/United Church of Christ activist who Israel wisely kept out of the country when she tried to get back in after the Sabeel conference held here in Boston. Dexter Van Zile does a great job responding to a prayer Johnson wrote: What kind of god?

Judging from a prayer she wrote to be used in worship services on the last two Sundays of 2007, Disciples of Christ member Krista Johnson worships one of two gods.

The first god is deaf to the calls of those who call for Israel’s destruction, blind to acts of violence perpetrated against Israel and dumb enough to believe that anti-Semitic groups like Hamas and Hezbollah can be mollified by conciliatory behavior on the part of the state they want to destroy.

The second god is too weak to be asked to address the really intractable problems facing humanity and can only deliver what is reasonable -- not what is necessary.

Johnson, a Sabeel activist who was recently denied access to Israel for problems with her visa, wrote a prayer currently published on the website of the Global Ministries Board, an institution supported by the United Church of Christ and the Disciples of Christ. The prayer offers a general petition for "peace with justice and security for Palestinians and Israelis." But when it comes time for the rubber to hit the road and for Johnson to make specific requests that reveal her understanding of the Arab-Israeli conflict, her indifference to Israeli suffering becomes manifest...

...Are these issues so far removed from Johnson's prophetic imagination that she can't be bothered to raise them? Is it impossible for her to ask that Palestinian leaders come to their senses, that the rocket attacks come to an end, that the incitement on Palestinian television stop? Are the kidnapped Israeli soldiers and their families so distant from Johnson's circle of Christian concern that she can't be bothered to offer a petition on their behalf? Has she not heard about Sderot's suffering? Is there no balm in Krista Johnson's heart for the Israelis?

Maybe there is another explanation for her silence on these issues. Maybe she understands just how intractable problems on the Arab and Muslim side of this 60-year-old conflict are. Maybe she secretly believes that the hand of the god she worships is too short to fix these problems and that it is not worth the effort to ask...

Friday, December 21, 2007

Chief scientist in sports cars warning to women

Sir David, who is due to retire as the UK's Chief Scientific Adviser at the end of the year, said individuals needed to change their behaviour.

"I was asked at a lecture by a young woman about what she could do and I told her to stop admiring young men in Ferraris," he said.

"What I was saying is that you have got to admire people who are conserving energy and not those wilfully using it."

How much do you want to bet he drives a Prius?

Fausta links to this story, saying:

The chief scientist might also want to warn men who like women in fast cars, too, lest he be accused of sexism. But, after all, if the chief scientist is a purist..

Like most purists, he's narrow-minded and thus uninformed. The Tesla roadster is 100% electric, and it goes from 0 to 60 in under 4 seconds.

There's also this Jetsons-style Aptera car.

aptera.jpg

I think I'll make another offer to test drive.

Here's an excellent symposium at FrontPage on the Muslim Brotherhood featuring Douglas Farah, Jeff Breinholt, Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, and Patrick Poole. Understanding the Brotherhood is essential in understanding the agenda of its domestic American spin-offs like CAIR, the Muslim American Society and the Islamic Society of Boston: Symposium: The "Moderate" Muslim Brotherhood?

Farah:

So let's not fool ourselves. The Americanized and European-ized Ikhwan are still Ikhwan. They cannot say their agenda in Europe and the United States is "a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions," as they write in their U.S. declaration of intent. So, they say they are working for "civil rights," to "end oppression and discrimination," etc. If they stated their real objective they would have no access to power. By reframing their public agenda as something Americans and Europeans understand and embrace (a true touch of genius), they have access to the FBI, DOD, presidents, secretaries of state etc.

So, as Patrick says, they tell us what we want to hear, but never abandon their true intent, and intent they make clear in their internal writings.

So Israel didn't push to have video of Egyptian border guards helping Hamas terrorists across the border into Gaza because they didn't want 'to escalate tension with Cairo.' Just once I'd like to see Israel (or the US for that matter) let Cairo (or anyone else) worry about escalating tensions with Jerusalem: Why the US hasn't seen smuggling tapes

Despite efforts by the country's top security echelon to share with Congress videotapes of Egypt assisting Hamas in arms smuggling, the footage has been shown only to some administration officials and never made it to Congress, to avoid infuriating the Egyptians, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

The videotapes included footage of Egyptian border policemen allegedly assisting a group of close to 80 Hamas terrorists crossing illegally into Gaza through a hole they had cut in the border fence.

Defense officials said there was also evidence that the Egyptians were assisting Hamas with smuggling weapons into the Gaza Strip under the Philadelphi Corridor.

The decision to send the tapes to the Israeli Embassy in Washington was made by Israel's top defense echelon to influence the appropriations process in Congress ahead of a decision to withhold part of the foreign aid granted to Egypt.

That the tape was not shown to Congress reflects a desire by Israel's political and diplomatic echelon not to escalate tension with Cairo by becoming directly involved in lobbying against Egypt in Congress.

For months there has been a debate inside the government over how directly Israel should get involved in the issue inside Washington.

The perception that won the day this time was that over-involvement would be seen by Cairo as an infringement of certain diplomatic "rules" between the two countries and could lead to a major crisis...

PJM is running a contest -- pick the top three winners in both parties in both Iowa and New Hampshire and you could win a free iPhone. I'm not even sure I really want an iPhone (maybe I do), but I'm entering -- like I'll pick 'em right, anyway. I expect to have about as much success in this as I did picking trifectas at the dog track years ago. I suppose the finishers are a bit easier to pick in this, though (as opposed to trying to determine which dog just offloaded a little mass before the race).

This story is almost unbelievable. To call the phone calls in question a "prank" is putting quite a gloss on it. Staff of a group home for troubled teens administered electro-shock to two of the young men in their charge on the basis of phone calls they thought were coming from the home office. What a nightmare: Staff faulted in use of shock

STOUGHTON - A state report identifies multiple failures by staff members of a group home that allowed two emotionally disturbed teenagers to be given dozens of electrical shocks at the direction of a caller posing as a supervisor.

The report says none of the six staff members in a Stoughton residence run by the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center on the night of Aug. 26 acted to stop the harrowing events for three hours, despite ample reasons to doubt the validity of the caller's instructions to wake the boys in the middle of the night and administer painful shock treatments, at times while their arms and legs were bound.

The caller said he was ordering the punishments because the teenagers had misbehaved earlier in the evening, but none of the home's staff had witnessed the behavior that the caller cited. As the two boys' screams could be heard throughout the house, near-mutiny erupted among the other boys, who insisted that the accused teenagers had violated no rules. One boy even suggested the call was a hoax, according to the report by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, which licenses group homes.

The staffers, inexperienced and overworked, were described as concerned and reluctant, yet nobody verified the orders with central office, nor did anybody check treatment plans for the two teenagers to be sure they were permitted to receive that degree of shock therapy.

The Rotenberg Center has long been controversial for punishing students with two-second shocks, delivered through electrodes attached to their skin, and it is now permitted only on residents with court-approved "aversive therapy" plans...

Thursday, December 20, 2007


Palestinian Media Watch reports that a video displaying the joy of martyrdom is back in heavy rotation on Palestinian Authority TV (see video above). Nothing like preparing the people for peace: Virgins of Paradise - music video returns to PA TV. PMW has other examples of the PA's extolling the joy of death in their report.

Now, I can understand the whole 72 Virgins thing, but why would you want to be one of the 72? What's the motivation there?

Lots of disturbing stuff to think about in this article: Iran making push into Nicaragua

... As part of a new partnership with Nicaragua's Sandinista President Daniel Ortega, Iran and its Venezuelan allies plan to help finance a $350 million deep-water port at Monkey Point on the wild Caribbean shore, and then plow a connecting "dry canal" corridor of pipelines, rails and highways across the country to the populous Pacific Ocean. Iran recently established an embassy in Nicaragua's capital.

In feeling threatened by Iran's ambitions, the people of Monkey Point have powerful company. The Iranians' arrival in Nicaragua comes as the Bush administration and some European allies hold the threat of war over Iran to force an end to its uranium enrichment program and alleged help to anti-U.S. insurgents in Iraq.

What worries state department officials, former national security officials and counterterrorism researchers is that, if attacked, Iran could stage strikes on American or allied interests from Nicaragua, deploying the Iranian terrorist group Hezbollah and Revolutionary Guard operatives already in Latin America. Bellicose threats by Iran's clerical leadership to hit American interests worldwide if attacked, by design or not, heighten the anxiety.

"The bottom line is if there is a confrontation with Iran, and Iran gets bombed, I have absolutely no doubt that Iran is going to lash out globally," said John R. Schindler, a veteran former counterintelligence officer and analyst for the National Security Agency.

"The Iranians have that ability, particularly from South America. Hezbollah has fronts all over Latin America. That is not new. But it's certainly something we're starting to care about now."

American policymakers already had been fretting in recent years over Tehran's successful forging of diplomatic relations, direct air routes and embassy swaps with populist South American governments that abhor the U.S., such as President Hugo Chávez's Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador. But Iran's latest move places it just a few porous borders from Texas, where illegal Nicaraguan laborers routinely travel...

... Few Nicaragua observers believe Iran seriously plans to follow through on any of its $500 million promises or has any obvious need for trade ties with one of Latin America's poorest countries.

Opposition politicians say they understand why Iran might want relations with oil-rich Venezuela and Bolivia but wonder aloud if Iran really is so interested in Nicaraguan bananas as their return on investment.

Those who view Iranian intentions with suspicion point to the new Iranian diplomatic mission in Managua as one reason for all the promises.

"They use their embassies to smuggle in weapons. They used them to develop and execute plans," said Oliver "Buck" Revell, who served as associate deputy director over FBI intelligence and international affairs. "Diplomats have immunity coming and going. It is a protected center for both espionage and, on occasion, for specific operations. So an embassy in Managua is definitely an area that will be of concern to our national security apparatus."...

This relationship blog has one take on the issue...

UNICEF has another. Their picture of the year:

unicef

Captioned: The image hardly fits our idea of the happy couple's wedding picture - but this haunting photograph taken in Afghanistan graphically captures life for millions of girls given in marriage while under age.

It's true that UNICEF is doing a good thing here, highlighting this picture because they want to bring attention to this problem.

But it's also true that underage marriage/slavery is common in Iran, Saudi Arabia and in other, relatively wealthy oil-rich states. There's also the fact that underage marriage is also practiced in Sudan and Mauritania, where Islam-sanctioned slavery is also encouraged.

So why are they specifically highlighting Afghanistan? I'd guess because it proves their standard claim that war (involving America) and poverty are the cause of all evils.

It also confirms their belief that quiet, peaceful advocacy for children's rights, based on "respect for the dignity and worth of each individual, regardless of race, colour, gender, language, religion, opinions, origins, wealth, birth status or ability" will stop Islamist bullies like the 'husband' pictured here from raping and enslaving children.

It isn't and it won't.

She's lost her Georgia Congressional seat twice, so that hasn't worked out so well... Hey, I know! What about a Presidential run? Cynthia McKinney has found a place where she can be a big fish in a small pond: the Green Party. Ousted Georgia lawmaker to run for president

ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- Former Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who was ousted from office last year after a headline-grabbing scuffle with a Capitol Hill police officer, has decided to seek the presidency -- as a Green Party candidate.

In a video posted on the Internet on Tuesday, McKinney criticized the war in Iraq and complained about Democrats and Republicans, saying both parties are beholden to corrupt corporate interests. She called the Green Party "my new political home."

McKinney, 52, registered to vote in California after a group called Run! Cynthia! Run! began drafting her as the Green Party's candidate there. Since then, she had made campaign appearances in Texas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin...

...McKinney is one of at least seven Green Party candidates for president. The party will select its presidential nominee at its July 10 convention in Chicago.

I think I'll put on my yarmulke and celebrate.

Thanks to Erika Dreifus at Practicing Writing -- a blog I hadn't seen before -- for tagging me in her post In Praise of Powerful Writing. Very nice of her. Now I feel guilty that I haven't been writing much more than a paragraph or two at a time in awhile.

Please note that if you tag me with one of these blog things, the "tag" will probably stop here. I just hate picking out a few people from those I communicate with or read and risk bad feelings in leaving someone out. Never let it be said I don't over-think things.

Presumably, "What are your exact longitude and latitude coordinates" will not be among those Zawahiri will be answering.

Not exactly breaking, but good anyway: Shot duck survives 2 days in refrigerator - Raises head when hunter’s wife opens door

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - Neither gunfire nor two days in a refrigerator could slay this duck.

When the wife of the hunter who shot it opened the refrigerator door, the duck lifted its head, giving her a scare.

The man’s wife "was going to check on the refrigerator because it hadn’t been working right and when she opened the door, it looked up at her," said Laina Whipple, a receptionist at Killearn Animal Hospital. "She freaked out and told the daughter to take it to the hospital right then and there."

The 1-pound female ringneck ended up at Goose Creek Wildlife Sanctuary, where it has been treated since Tuesday for wounds to its wing and leg...

Reminds me of:

 

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Is anthropology so overrun with campus politicians that they can't find anyone who simply does research? Anti-Racist blog has a report on Columbia's newest import: New Professor, Same Old Anti-Israel Agenda at the Columbia Anthropology Department

...Professor Boyd digs the epipaleolithic, the transition to agriculture, the rise and decline of the sedentary-but-non-agricultural Natifian culture, a culture that disappeared from the face of the earth 13,000 years ago - 10,000 years before the rise of the Davidic kingdom.

Can you imagine how extremely difficult it must have been to find an archaeologist working in Israel who digs in such a way that it is inconceivable that he should happen upon an artifact with any Jewish, Christian, Muslim, or even Babylonian or Assyrian connections?

The Natufians are fascinating, no doubt, but most people would see little relationship between Paleolithic artifacts and contemporary politics. Never fear. The Columbia Anthropology Department has hired a scholar of the Paleolithic who manages to use his Natufian expertise to make scholarly statements on Israel and gay identity politics.

Among Professor Boyd’s specialties are "queer theory" and "cultural politics in Israel and Palestine."...

Well, I guess just being an expert in a 13,000 year old dead culture doesn't exactly make you a must-invite to the local cocktail circuit.

Absolutely shocking.

This is what these people are putting up with on a daily basis. No government in the world should be expected to allow this to continue.

Will Spotts jumps on another remarkable editorial by James Wall of The Christian Century: The Christian Century Strikes Again

Spotts:

Last week I posted an article, "A Curious Silence", about a peculiar form of activism among some professing Christians that leaves behind anything pro-Palestinian and embraces anti-Israel bias and anti-Jewish animus. Two telling features of this hypocritical, harmful, and decidedly unchristian activism are the application of a double standard to Israel and the rejection of a Jewish state. Interestingly, there is a Christian Century article, "Peace Brokers", dated December 25, 2007 (Merry Christmas …), that indulges in both of these practices. In it, Christian Century editor James Wall compares the recent Annapolis Peace Conference with a scene from Lawrence of Arabia. His primary concern is equating the role of the United States at Annapolis with the British in 1918 – both being, in his estimation, "empire-building colonialist power[s]" pretending to be honest brokers. He offers iron-clad evidence for this assertion in a very revealing paragraph:

Wall (emphasis from Spotts):

Nor can Bush hide the fact that he is not an honest broker. At Annapolis this became obvious when he declared that Israel has to be a Jewish state, a position that Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat immediately rejected. Erekat knows that officially declaring Israel a Jewish state when 1.5 million Arab Israelis are within its borders is a contradiction in terms. He also knows that by defining the future state as Jewish, Bush signals that he favors the Israeli position in future negotiations on the right of return for Palestinian refugees.

Exsqueeze me? The future state? What future state? Is that what people like Wall believe Annapolis was about -- the future of Israel? Maybe Annapolis (and any other similar negotiation) is as dangerous as some people have been saying it is. Israel is. It is a Jewish state. Get used to it. Saeb Erekat and James Wall need to start reciting the Serenity Prayer -- know it, live it, love it.

The rest of Will's post is here.

For the record:

Iran was behind the bombings over a decade ago in Argentina against the Israeli embassy and Jewish community center, according to the country's chief prosecutor, Alberto Nisman, who served as a special prosecutor investigating the attacks.

"I have no doubt that the most senior Iranian leadership, with the help of Hezbollah, is responsible for the attacks in Buenos Aires against AMIA [the community center in 1994] and the Israeli Embassy [in 1992]," Nisman said Tuesday night at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism of the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya.

While investigating the two attacks, Nisman found the necessary legal evidence pointing directly to former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani and his chief of intelligence, Ali Falahian, for their role in the decision to target the community center.

Argentina has issued an international arrest warrant for Rafsanjani, Falahian and a number of Iranian diplomats for their suspected role in the attack. A special Interpol conference approved the warrant at an international gathering in Marrakesh last month.

Nisman told Haaretz that the Iranians had tried to bribe many countries, mostly from Africa, to vote against the Interpol decision...

...Nisman was appointed to head the investigation after it emerged in an Argentine court that the previous investigating judge, Jose Galiano, had paid some $400,000 to a key witness in the case to incriminate former policemen, while diverting blame from Iran and Hezbollah...

He said that the breakthrough in the case came when he and his team identified with certainty the terrorist who carried out the truck bombing near the community center building in July 1994 - a Lebanese man, Ibrahim Hussein Berro. In the attack, 85 Argentines were killed and 230 were injured. Berro is believed to have come to Argentina a week or two before the attack.

Another important figure in the case was Muhsin Rabani, the senior Shi'ite cleric in Argentina.

Rabani, an Iranian, had lived in Argentina since 1983, and four months before the attack was issued a diplomatic passport by the Iranian government and the title of cultural attache at the embassy in Buenos Aires.

According to Nisman's investigation, Rabani opened an account at Deutsche Bank in Buenos Aires, where $150,000 was deposited, and which is believed to have been used to buy the vehicle the suicide bomber used...

In Hudson County, NJ we have a lot of overzealous meter maids. Sometimes they're a little too overzealous:

Parking Authority employee Susan Wojtkowski pleaded not guilty in Central Judicial Processing court today to a charge of obstructing a governmental function. The matter was referred back to Bayonne Municipal Court with a court date of Jan. 8.

Police said that on Dec. 7, Wojtkowski stood in front of an unmarked police car and prevented two plainclothes detectives, who had already identified themselves, from pursuing a drug suspect until she could affix a ticket to their windshield.

The devil is in the details...

At Winds of Change, Armed Liberal calls Jonah Goldberg's new book jaw-droppingly stupid.

I haven't read the book, but I already have problems with the title: "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning"

Liberal is not synonymous with left. Classic Liberals, like the people who founded the country and wrote the constitution, support a free market, equal opportunity and the separation of church and state.

The Left believes that the state should enforce equality through collective interests. They're opposed to individualism and an insufficiently regulated free market.

And what does Mussolini have to do with the history of the American Left?

If the title is that problematic, I'd worry about the rest of the text.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Anti-Racist Blog has exposed some of the emails of a widely-coordinated, nation-wide effort to use college campuses to delegitimize Israel: Conspiracy Revealed: Activists Plan Nationwide Campaign to Demonize Israel and Zionists on American College Campuses.

Looks like FInkelstein still has paying gigs available (as does British traitor George Galloway), courtesy of the Muslim Student Association and Students for Justice in Palestine.

I just wanted to say hello to everyone, and to say Thanks to Solomon for asking me to post on his site.

I've been reading Solomonia for years, but only met Sol about a year ago, at the Herzliya:Media as a Theater of War Conference in Israel.

Last year's visit was my first trip to the Middle East. The people I met at the conference, and in Lebanon, were an excellent introduction to the area. The western media likes to portray the smallest, most vulnerable states in the Middle East as lunatic and obstinate, the cause of most of the world's problems. Seeing these places firsthand, I could see that this portrayal was false.

Here are two posts, written shortly after that visit, on Israel and Lebanon, places that defy expectation:

Israel: Defying Gravity

Beirut Rules

I'd love to go back to the Middle East, when I can afford to (but not in December - dealing with both Hezbollah and online Christmas shopping, combined, was kind of stressful). Till then I'll be writing about the same things I do on my blog, Exit Zero. Politics, occasional tech, life in New York and beyond. I hope I can keep up with the high standards Solomonia readers have come to expect.

There's a lot of very good material in this Ruthie Blum interview with Manfred Gerstenfeld from the JCPA. Here's just a small snip:

...How do you explain what appear to be more and more cars with exhaust pipes emitting the kind of pollution your book deals with? And why is it being spread among the educated, self-proclaimed freethinking classes?

We live under the fallacy that educated people - or specialists in a certain field - have better judgment than the man in the street. One of the myths about the Nazis is that they were primitive - that the party had no intellectuals. I've even heard that said by the opening speaker at a major anti-Semitism conference. But if you ask people to name the leading philosopher in Europe in the second half of the 20th century, the dominant answer would be Martin Heidegger - a Nazi.

And if you ask them to rate the 10 most important thinkers of Europe, at that time you often find a second Nazi on that list: German law professor and political theorist Carl Schmitt.

The second point is that in many European countries, if you were not a leftist, you set yourself apart from the leading intellectuals.

I lived in France in the 1960s, and if you weren't on the Left - and even today if you aren't there - you were an intellectual outsider. So we have a generation of intellectuals - in particular in the "soft sciences," such as the humanities and social sciences, many of whom espouse a leftist ideology. These are often intellectuals who have no responsibility and carry their thoughts into a world totally separate from the real world - especially in today's situation, where their salaries are paid partly by the taxpayer.

The academic system has three major lines of defense. The first is academic freedom. The second is tenure. The third is calling its critics McCarthyites. Now, any self-governing world is corrupt by nature. And universities are not very efficient places, as anybody who teaches there will tell you.

Among other forms of corruption, they have been corrupted in the realm of thought. Rather than promoting thinking and the advancement of knowledge, in the soft sciences, you find quite a few people who are promoting ideology instead.

With that comes another consideration. The 1968 generation wanted to conquer the world. They went nowhere. So they took refuge in academia, the only part of the world where they found a real home. This often failed generation ended up in that one refuge, where they could promote each other - and bring in their buddies. This is, among others, particularly true of Middle Eastern studies departments in the United States...

According to Aretz Sheva:

IDF airstrikes in Gaza took out ten Palestinian Authority terrorists Monday night and Tuesday morning, including two senior Islamic Jihad leaders.

Majed Al-Harazin, among the terrorists killed in the first of three Israel Air Force attacks, was the commander of Islamic Jihad terrorist units throughout Gaza. Wanted by Israeli security services for many years, he was responsible for multiple attacks on Israeli soldiers and civilians, including rocket attacks and attempted suicide bombings. Harazin's group said it carried out the rocket attack on Kibbutz Zikkim Sunday afternoon that wounded an Israeli toddler and sent his mother and six others into psychological shock.

PA residents said that weapons dealer Khalil Masarai and a third terrorist were also killed in the first strike. The three were reportedly hit by an Israeli missile as they drove through the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood of Gaza City in a car full of explosives. Seven PA residents who were in proximity to the targeted vehicle were injured; three of them seriously...

...IDF sources confirmed a second airstrike in Gaza later the same night. The second attack killed Karim Dahduh, the head of Islamic Jihad's rocket production, along with three others. Several terrorists were wounded. A third airstrike in northern Gaza on Tuesday morning killed three more Islamic Jihad terrorists...

...In related counter-terrorism activity overnight, security forces apprehended eleven wanted terrorists in Judea and Samaria. The wanted men were captured in Beit Oula, northwest of Hevron, Beit Oumar, southwest of Bethlehem, Kawat Bani Hassan, southeast of Kalkilya, Ba-Tira, west of Ramallah, Bituniya, west of Ramallah, and in Hevron. The terrorists were transferred to interrogators for questioning...

Even after IDF forces carried out counter-terrorism operations on Monday, enemy attackers in Gaza launched a barrage of at least eight rockets and mortar shells at the northern Negev. No injuries were reported, but damage to property was caused in the multiple bombings.

One PA mortar shell targeted soldiers near the Kissufim Crossing, while gunmen opened fire on an IDF patrol in the area. No soldiers were wounded in the attacks. PA terrorists often attack the civilian crossings between Gaza and the Negev region, leading the IDF to keep many of them closed when possible...

Islamic Jihad, eh? Sami Al-Arian must be mourning in his jail cell.

OK, Tony Blair is at least saying a few of the right things:

Tony Blair brings to his job as the international community's Middle East envoy the instinctive optimism that was his hallmark as Britain's prime minister...

..."Having a state is not just a question of territory," Mr Blair insisted in an interview with the Financial Times. "It is about the nature of what happens inside the state . . . So the single most important thing I can do to help the Palestinians is tell them the truth. And the truth is that there will not be a [Palestinian] state unless the nature of that state is clear."...

...Critics say there is much wrong with Mr Blair's strategy - not least the exclusion of Hamas and the international community's failure to commit Israel to stopping all Jewish settlement expansion. There are also fears that backing one Palestinian faction could exacerbate internal divisions and set the stage for a Palestinian civil war.

But Mr Blair did not believe in engaging Hamas. He stressed that the Islamist group could only be brought into negotiations once it recognised Israel and renounced violence.

The final tally on that aid conference? $7.4 Billion. Is the "International Community" going to pay any more attention to where the money goes this time? I doubt it. Khaled Abu Toameh:

...When the second intifada erupted in September 2000, it was also because many Palestinians had nothing to lose. Instead of establishing industrial zones to provide jobs for many unemployed Palestinians, Arafat established a casino and bought luxury vehicles for his loyalists. Instead of building housing projects for the needy, Arafat gave his wife a monthly allowance of $100,000 to support her shopping sprees in Paris.

To cover up for the rampant corruption and mismanagement in the PA, Arafat unleashed a wave of incitement against Israel and the West, especially in the media and mosques. This is the Arab dictators' way of diverting attention from the real problems at home - by keeping their peoples busy hating the West and Israel.

It's estimated that Arafat's PA had received nearly $6.5b. in international aid. A former Arafat aide once admitted that had most of the money been invested for the welfare of the Palestinians, it's most likely they would not have resorted to violence in September 2000 or voted for Hamas six years later.

Plans to reform the PA have been surfacing since Salaam Fayad was first appointed as finance minister in June 2002...

...This money is mainly designed to keep Fatah in power and prevent Hamas from taking over the West Bank. And unless the PA changes its rhetoric and starts promoting real peace and coexistence with Israel, the millions of dollars are not going to create a new generation of moderate Palestinians.

Israel's security measures, including movement restrictions and closures, are also not helping to boost the standing of the moderate camp.

The only way to undermine Hamas is not by channeling billions of dollars to the PA leadership, but by offering the Palestinians a better alternative to the Islamist movement. In order for Fatah to regain the confidence of the Palestinian public, it needs to reform itself and pave the way for new faces. The tens of thousands of Palestinians who participated in the Hamas anniversary rally over the weekend should have sounded an alarm bell in Paris and Ramallah, namely that the Islamist movement continues to enjoy massive support despite economic sanctions imposed on the Gaza Strip.

Catch-22. Security measures are lightened when security conditions improve, not the other way around. No government is going to trust PA promises on spec at this point.

You think they're bringing in gas for the hospitals or food for the shops? Israel sends US videos of Egypt helping Hamas

Israel is sending video tapes showing Egyptian policemen assisting Palestinian terrorists along the Egypt-Gaza border to the United States Congress as part of an effort to influence the legislative body into clamping pressure on Cairo to stop weapons smuggling into the Gaza Strip.

The video footage - which allegedly shows Egyptian security forces assisting Hamas terrorists cross illegally into Gaza - is being transferred to Congress through diplomatic channels and is intended for senior congressmen and senators who can have an effect on the House foreign aid appropriations process. Israel believes this can be an effective way of pressuring Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak into clamping down on Hamas smuggling activities...

...Officials in Washington could not confirm that the Israeli videotapes had been received, but assessments were that damning video footage of Egyptian Border Police involvement in the Gaza smuggling industry would badly damage Egypt's already tarnished image. That, however, might not be enough to force any change in aid arrangements, which face opposition by Egypt, a key US ally and some congressmen who worry reducing aid will damage the strategic US-Egypt-Israel relationship, among other concerns.

A delegation of American military engineers recently toured the Egyptian side of the Philadelphi Corridor and was shown a number of tunnels that the Egyptians tried to portray as being too small to smuggle weapons through. The delegation was not convinced by the Egyptians and demanded that Cairo take more decisive action against the smuggling industry.

According to recent assessments, since Hamas's takeover of Gaza in June, the terrorist group has smuggled into Gaza 100 tons of explosives, millions of bullets, hundreds of antitank missiles and even a small number of Katyusha rockets...

That's 10% of the population...just another way of spinning the results of this poll (as far as it's reported by CNN -- we know how careful we have to be about the way the MSM spins poll results). Saudis also support war on Israel, but aren't too keen on being blown up themselves, apparently. The majority doesn't much care for Hizballah (the Hez is Shi'ite, after all), and they're split on Hamas. They are the most pro-American, with 40% viewing us "favorably" (which leaves the majority on the other side): Poll: Most Saudis oppose al Qaeda

Most Saudi Arabia citizens interviewed in a poll oppose terrorism and want closer ties with the United States. But many Saudis remain opposed to making peace with Israel, according to what researchers call an unprecedented survey of the kingdom.

Ten percent of Saudis have a favorable view of the al Qaeda terrorist network, according to a survey by Terror Free Tomorrow, an international public opinion research group based in Washington.

Fifteen percent said they have a favorable view of al Qaeda's leader, Saudi exile Osama bin Laden, the poll found...

...Saudis also have a better opinion of the United States than in other countries in the Muslim world, with 40 percent saying they view the U.S. favorably. That compares to 19 percent in Pakistan, according to a poll taken by the same group in August, and 21 percent of Egyptians, according to a May survey by the Pew Research Center.

But while the poll was encouraging, "It's not all Kumbaya," he added. Bergen said a "substantial minority" of Saudis -- 30 percent -- support fighting against U.S. and coalition troops in Iraq, and 52 percent would support Saudi Arabia's development of nuclear weapons...

...Thirty-three percent of Saudis viewed Hezbollah favorably, compared to 42 percent unfavorably. When asked about Hamas, 37 percent had a positive response, while 38 percent viewed the group unfavorably.

But Ballen said the survey shows the Saudi population is now one of the most pro-American in the Muslim world, with 69 percent of those surveyed supporting close ties between Riyadh and Washington...

...Saudi King Abdullah is the leading advocate of an Arab League proposal that would normalize relations with the Jewish state in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal to the frontiers it held before the 1967 Mideast War.

But his support for a comprehensive Mideast peace "definitely does not carry over at all," Ballen said: Thirty percent of Saudis support a peace treaty, even if it resulted in the establishment of a Palestinian state, the survey found.

"He's not backed by his own citizens on that," Ballen said.

Saudis expressed support for a free press and free elections, though 79 percent also said they continued to support an absolute monarchy -- and 15 percent supported the recent sentence of 200 lashes and six months imprisonment of a 19-year old Shiite woman for being with a male acquaintance before she was gang-raped by seven men...

So Scott Ritter sees the hand of the "Israel Lobby" in the President and the Congress...now that's a lobby! Well, I suppose when you can't get the world to see things your way, it must be the hidden hand at work. What other explanation could there be? Perhaps It Is Time For The U.S. To Reconsider Its Partnership With Israel

... As a firsthand witness to the remarkable vigor of the Israeli state and its people, and as someone who considers himself to be their friend, it saddens me to see just how poorly the current Israeli government returns this friendship, not to me personally, but to my country, the United States of America. The government of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has embarked on policies that are questionable at best when one examines them from a purely Israeli standpoint; they are nothing less than a betrayal of the United States when examined from a broader perspective.

The insidious manner in which the current Israeli government has manipulated the domestic political machinery of the United States to produce support for its policies constitutes nothing less than direct interference in the governance of a sovereign state. The degree to which the current Israeli government has succeeded in this regard can be tracked not only by the words and actions of the administration of President George W. Bush and the American Congress, but also by the extent to which a pro-Israel lexicon has taken hold within the mainstream media of the United States. Witness the pro-Israel bias displayed when discussing the situation in southern Lebanon, the air strike in Syria, or the Iranian situation, and the retarding of any effort toward a responsible discussion of anything dealing with Israel becomes apparent.

One would expect such efforts to shape the domestic public opinion of a state deemed hostile, but when the target of these Israeli actions is its ostensible best friend, one must begin to question whether or not the friendship is a one-way street. And if this is indeed the case, then perhaps it is time for the United States to reconsider its decades-old policy of strategic partnership with Israel...

This and another email I received this morning with a similar theme had me remembering this old Eddie Murphy SNL skit:

 

Monday, December 17, 2007

The West's superficial consumer society thinks it can buy peace at the store. A lack of funding is not what's keeping Palestinian Arab society at war. But sure, let's toss a few billion at the problem. Like a lot of spending sprees on a smaller scale, this one is meant to mitigate some strange sort of guilt and feeling of powerlessness. Do this and we can all say it's someone else's fault. Trust me, it'll go on Israel's blame tab when it all goes flush, not the Arabs': World powers gather in Paris to bankroll Palestinian state

PARIS (AFP) - Major powers and key donors meet in Paris Monday for a conference aimed at raising billions of dollars to help the emergence of a viable Palestinian state and give political impetus to the newly-relaunched peace process with Israel.

Ninety international delegations are expected at the one-day Conference of Donors for a Palestinian State, the biggest of its kind since 1996, which aims to shore up the process jumpstarted in the US city of Annapolis last month.

Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas is seeking 5.6 billion dollars (3.85 billion euros) spread over 2008 to 2010 for an ambitious development plan to underwrite a promised state and tackle economic hardship in the Palestinian territories.

The United States is ready to pledge more than 500 million dollars, officials in Washington said.

Delegates gathering for the occasion include UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov...

A fraction of a fraction of 500 million would pay my mortgage. Better use.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Here's another good panel from the Jewish Policy Center: American Foreign Policy in the Middle East - Dangerous Times in a Dangerous Neighborhood. Recorded at Temple Emanu-El, San Francisco, CA. Moderator: Michael Medved, Panelists: John Podhoretz, Dennis Prager and Mona Charen.

Good stuff. Prager's rant on the "experts knowing their place" is classic.

Terrific piece by Jeff in today's Globe on what it is to be a Jew in America:

ON THE 7th night of Hanukkah in 1944, my father was in Auschwitz. He had been deported with his family to the Nazi extermination camp eight months earlier; by Hanukkah, only my father was still alive. That year, he kindled no Hanukkah lights. In Auschwitz, where anything and everything was punishable by death, any Jew caught practicing his religion could expect to be sent to the gas chambers, or shot on the spot.

Moreover, Hanukkah, like other Jewish holidays, was often chosen deliberately by the Nazis as an occasion for murdering Jews. In "Hasidic Tales of the Holocaust," the historian Yaffa Eliach recounts one such slaughter:

"The men selected were marched outside. SS men with rubber truncheons and iron prods awaited them. They kicked, beat, and tortured the innocent victims. When the tortured body no longer responded, the revolver was used. . . . The brutal massacre continued outside of the barracks until sundown. When the [Nazis] departed, they left behind heaps of hundreds of tortured and twisted bodies."

Last week, on the 7th night of Hanukkah 2007, I was in the White House. President and Mrs. Bush have made it an annual tradition to host a Hanukkah celebration in addition to the customary White House Christmas parties, and my wife and I were honored to receive an invitation to this year's reception.

It was a beautiful and festive event. It was also an undeniably Jewish one, from the lavish buffet dinner prepared in a carefully "koshered" White House kitchen, to the Hebrew songs performed by the Zamir Chorale, to the several hundred guests drawn from every segment of the American Jewish community...

Worth reading in full. Now, how do I score one of those invites?

Here's another good interview, in three parts, this time with the impressive M. Zuhdi Jasser at National Review: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Last Tuesday, the Harvard Alliance for Israel and the Harvard Students for Israel sponsored a talk by Al-Dura trial defendant Philippe Karsenty. Karsenty discussed his trial as well as the issue of the Muhammed Al Dura saga generally. I was there and filmed the entire presentation, which I present to you below, including the opening remarks by Joel Pollak and Q&A. The sound could be better, but I think it's listenable. I actually have a much better version of the audio I got by putting a recorder on the podium, but I'm having a devil of a time getting it to synch with the video, so at this point I'm afraid you may just have to turn the volume up. I've posted the mp3 for download for those who would like that, though there is a frequent use of video in the presentation.


In other news, Nidra Poller has an article at Pajamas Media today regarding the bombshell disclosure that Jamal Al Dura (the father) actually had his scars (scars he's shown off to journalists the world over) years earlier (Karsenty discusses this in his presentation and shows pictures of Jamal's arm): Wounds of Mohamed al Dura's Father Date Back to 1992, Surgeon Reveals

The wounds purportedly sustained on September 30 2000 by Jamal al Dura "target of gunfire from the Israeli positions"—in the words of France 2 bureau chief Charles Enderlin—were in fact incurred in 1992. Jamal, identified as the father of the shahid [martyr] Mohamed al Dura, is one of the two living witnesses to the incident that triggered the "Al Aqsa Intifada." The al Dura news report has been the subject of controversy for seven years.

Philippe Karsenty, who is appealing his 2006 defamation conviction—for declaring on his Media-Ratings site that the al Dura news report was a blatant fake—obtained medical records proving that Jamal’s wounds were treated by an Israeli surgeon in 1994. Now the surgeon, Yehuda David, has confirmed this information on a December 12 newscast on Israel’s Arutz 10 TV. Jean Tsadik of Metula News Agency resumed the Hebrew-language newscast for French-speaking readers.

According to the Metula release, Jamal al Dura declared on medical records in 1992 that Palestinian militia had attacked him with axes. Doctors at Gaza’s Shifa Hospital were able to save his life but he lost the use of his right hand because they could not repair a ruptured tendon in the forearm. Palestinian doctors referred Jamal to Tal Hashomer hospital in Tel Aviv in March 1994. Dr. Yehuda performed reconstructive surgery, grafting a tendon taken from the foot, and restoring almost normal use of the hand. The medical record of that operation also refers to the removal of "foreign bodies," suggesting that other instruments besides axes were used in the 1992 attack.

Alerted by the Ména [Metula News Agency] to the film of Jamal’s wounds produced in 2004 by Talal Abu Rahma at the demand of France 2 news director Arlette Chabot, to silence investigators, Dr. Yehuda and his colleagues declare that the scars shown in that film were incurred in 1992 and result from axe blade wounds and definitely not from gunshot. They are ready and willing to testify to this in any court.

The Metula release promises further revelations in the near future...

...Now we learn that Jamal used the arm restored by Israeli surgeons to act out the blood libel that provoked the murderous rage that killed countless Israeli civilians, including courageous doctors who had treated Palestinians with the same generosity he experienced...

Last week I got together with CAMERA's Dexter Van Zile for a follow-up on the Sabeel conference held at Old South Church in Boston. Our first discussion, before the event, is here.

In this video, Dexter discusses a bit about the conference, the implications and context, and he introduces an absolutely mind-blowing publication available from Sabeel -- conveniently only in hard copy -- that puts the lie to the idea that Sabeel and Rev. Naim Ateek have put their days of using deicide imagery and scriptural references to demonize Jews behind them.

Dexter's formal report on the Sabeel document he shows in the film: Sabeel's Demonizing Liturgy.

Sister Ruth Lautt from Christians for Fair Witness on the Middle East: The Church’s Witness on Issues in the Arab/Israeli Conflict

All my posts that mention Sabeel: Search

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Miss Kelly has several on this under-noticed case. See:

Update - Care International Trial in Boston - Wiretaps! Tourism!

Care International Trial - No Jihad Here, Just Idle Chit-Chat

And on the general subject of terror-trials: Prosecuting Terrorism Cases - Review of Capitol Hill Panel

Update (Bumped): Miss Kelly points to a new Worcester Telegram article with some interesting info: Waging Economic Jihad / Are Jewish Federal Agents Biased?. The Telegram article describes a hearing out of the presence of the jury involving 'Matthew Levitt, former Deputy Assistant U.S. Treasury Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis' and 'a former intelligence analyst for the FBI':

...Norman S. Zalkind, a lawyer for Emadeddin Z. Muntasser, questioned Mr. Levitt’s employment at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, which was founded by a former official of AIPAC, a lobbying organization of Israel. He also noted that Mr. Levitt spent time living with his father in Israel and speaks Hebrew, but only now is learning Arabic.

When he questioned whether Mr. Levitt, who did undergraduate work at Yeshiva University, studied the Torah, Judge Saylor interrupted to ask why he was asking. Mr. Zalkind said he was questioning Mr. Levitt’s biases and prejudices...

The spectacle of Zalkind questioning Levitt's status as a Jew and thus his ability to remain unprejudiced writes its own punch line.

Harvey Silverglate, Norman Zalkind, Susan Estrich...these guys certainly have a vigorous defense. See Miss Kelly's for more.

Here is an extremely thoughtful piece by our friend Will Spotts, originally posted on his own blog, cross-posted by permission. Well worth spending time on.

Over the last several years a peculiar kind of activism has emerged within many Christian denominations. It has not, of course, been confined to Christian groups; it has also found a place of honor on college campuses, on conspiracy websites, among political “activists”, among ultra-left and ultra-right wing groups, and among a certain class of celebrity. On its good days this peculiar activism has presented itself as pro-Palestinian. That is a tenable position; it could have some moral support; people of good will could hold it; depending on what precisely it entails, it could be a completely good thing. Far more commonly, this activism presents itself as anti-Israel and anti-Zionist. This is less tenable; the fact that no other nation is treated in quite the same way is alarming; there is, for example, no anti-Denmark or anti-India movement that would be acceptable to this cast of supporters – or really to people of good will generally. It is true that there have been anti-Communists, and it is true that there are anti-Capitalists; but I can find no remotely similar parallel to the anti-Israel anti-Zionist emphasis. This peculiar, widely-supported activism goes farther on many occasions: it becomes anti-Jewish. The transition from anti-Israel and anti-Zionist into anti-Jewish is made without generating any reaction among its supporters.

That this transition is greeted with silence by the supporters of the pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel anti-Zionist movements is, to a degree, predictable; people will often fail to see the downside of a movement in which they have become emotionally invested. It would take something truly extraordinary to shock into contemplating the ultimate extremely harmful effects of their chosen actions. The thing I can neither understand nor accept is this: the general silence from the larger population. This peculiar and fashionable activism occurs within Christian denominations, but it does not have the support of all or even most of their members. This activism occurs on college campuses, but it does not have the support of all or even most faculty members or students. This activism occurs in political circles, but it does not have the support of all or even most progressives or all ultra-conservatives. This activism occurs in unions, but it does not have the support of all or even most union members. So why, when it is transformed from pro-Palestinian (which could be a good thing) through the anti-Israel and anti-Zionist phases (which cease to be good and become disturbing), into its anti-Jewish end point (which is vile and reprehensible), do the members of these communities who are not emotionally invested remain silent? Why do they fail to react? How is it that Christians in many denominations are OK with an anti-Jewish animus being expressed by their own churches? How is it that college communities have no problem with this profoundly loathsome philosophy that propagates ignorance? How is it that the members of unions and of political parties that seem to be motivated by the idea of improving things can remain silent in the face of what has had hideous consequences so many times in history?

Continue reading "A Recovering Presbyterian: A Curious Silence"

This is a powerful criticism of anti-Zionism from the left by Mitchell Cohen. You'll have to get by the "neocon-bashing" to unearth the good stuff: Anti-Semitism and the Left that Doesn’t Learn

...A FEW YEARS ago I sought to outline commonalities between anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist discourses in a scholarly journal. It is worth reproducing. Here are major motifs that inform classical anti-Semitism:

1) Insinuations: Jews do not and cannot fit properly into our society. There is something foreign, not to mention sinister about them.

2) Complaints: They are so particularistic, those Jews, so preoccupied with their “own.” Why are they so clannish and anachronistic when we need a world of solidarity and love? Really, they make themselves into a "problem." If the so-called "Jewish problem" is singular in some way, it is their own doing and usually covered up by special pleading.

3) Remonstrations: Those Jews, they always carp that they are victims. In fact, they have vast power, especially financial power. Their power is everywhere, even if it is not very visible. They exercise it manipulatively, behind the scenes. (But look, there are even a few of them, guilty-hearted perhaps, who will admit it all this to you).

4) Recriminations: Look at their misdeeds, all done while they cry that they are victims. These ranged through the ages from the murder of God to the ritual slaughter of children to selling military secrets to the enemy to war-profiteering, to being capitalists or middlemen or landlords or moneylenders exploiting the poor. And they always, oh-so-cleverly, mislead you.

Alter a few phrases, a word here and there, and we find motifs of anti-Zionism that are popular these days in parts of the left and parts of the Muslim and Arab worlds:

1) Insinuations: The Zionists are alien implants in the Mideast. They can never fit there. Western imperialism created the Zionist state.

2) Complaints: A Jewish state can never be democratic. Zionism is exclusivist. The very idea of a Jewish state is an anachronism.

3) Remonstrations: The Zionists carp that they are victims but in reality they have enormous power, especially financial. Their power is everywhere, but they make sure not to let it be too visible. They exercise it manipulatively, behind people’s backs, behind the scenes – why, just look at Zionist influence in Washington. Or rather, dominance of Washington. (And look, there are even a few Jews, guilty-hearted perhaps, who admit it).

4) Recriminations: Zionists are responsible for astonishing, endless dastardly deeds. And they cover them up with deceptions. These range from the imperialist aggression of 1967 to Ehud Barak’s claim that he offered a compromise to Palestinians back in 2000 to the Jenin "massacre" during the second Intifidah...

...No, anti-Zionism is not in principle anti-Semitism but it is time for thoughtful minds—especially on the left—to be disturbed by how much anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism share, how much the dominant species of anti-Zionism encourages anti-Semitism...

"This is my BOOM STICK"

memrijewquake.jpg

The reporter actually leads the witness here, making the Hamas guy look moderate by comparison. For those not in the know, the idea that "the Jews" are undermining the Temple Mount for nefarious purposes is a long-time method of incitement to murder. They had the kids in yesterday's clip doing it, too.

MEMRI TV: Hamas MP Ahmad Abu Halabiya: Israel Uses Artificial Earthquakes to Shake the Foundations of Al-Aqsa Mosque

Following are excerpts from an interview with Hamas MP Ahmad Abu Halabiya, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on December 5, 2007.

Interviewer: Some geologists and environmental scientists say that the earthquakes that recently struck Jerusalem and the Dead Sea are artificial earthquakes, caused by the occupation forces, in an effort to destroy the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque. Is there any evidence of this?

Ahmad Abu Halabiya: The truth is that some of these earthquakes may be artificial, while others are natural. What is dangerous is the excavations underneath Al-Aqsa Mosque and the network of tunnels that was built. These have begun to threaten the foundations of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Therefore, any earthquake – whether natural of artificial – measuring more than 5.5 or 6 on the Richter Scale will definitely have an impact, unless Allah decrees otherwise. This will have an impact on the foundations of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. This is where the danger lies, whether the earthquake is artificial or natural. In any case, it is not impossible for the Jews to generate an artificial earthquake one way or another, in order to accomplish their goal of destroying the foundations of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, as a step towards the construction of their false temple, God forbid.

By Pamela, from a few days back. Hard-hitting:

Last week, a line was crossed. A terrible line was crossed at Annapolis. With the world looking on, the President of the United States sponsored Judeophobia. Jew-hatred was okay, understandable even.

Under the auspices of a global "peace" conference, the White House sanctioned Jew-hatred. The Jew is contemptible, inferior, ignorant, politically and socially disenfranchised: separate entrance ways, service entrances for the Jews, refusal to touch or shake hands with a Jew, refusal of audience members to wear the translation earphones when Ehud Olmert spoke.

"Saud Al-Faisel's ears, underneath his red keffiyah, were left bare. And no, it wasn't because he understood Hebrew. It was the Saudi method of demonstrating their relationship to the State of Israel. Even as the Israeli Prime Minister was greeting him and speaking of peace, they were refusing to listen. For a minute I thought I was wrong that maybe there was a technical problem. But then I saw his aide next to him - also leaving his ears demonstrably naked."

Then, as Olmert's speech ended, and the audience applauded: "The Saudi representative also brought his palms together in order to appear polite. Only someone who sat very close to him could see that the never touched. The little game that the Saudis were playing was just one contradiction - the least noticeable one - in a day full of contradictions." ...(Read more here.)

Submitting to Saudi demands, the Americans prohibited Israeli representatives from entering the hall through the same door as the Arabs. Vile - all of it; sanctioned and institutionalized by the President of the United States. I thought George Bush was a Christian, a man of faith. Shocking. He has squandered his second term and has not acted in good faith. We did not elect him to carry Condi's water.

It is unfathomable to consider this with any other race, creed or color. Imagine separate entrances for the leader of an African nation because a "white" leader refused to walk through the same door as the black man, because it would be unclean?

And Israel took it like the ghetto Jew...

I'm on record as thinking a lot of the commentary leading up to Annapolis ended up being overblown, but don't you just wish someone had pointed at Al-Faisel and shouted, "Why is that man not wearing headphones?"

Any money sent to any PA entity right now is likely going to fund terrorism.

U.S. government officials authorized giving nearly $1 million in foreign aid to a Palestinian university with links to the terrorist group Hamas, despite vetting the school eight times for ties to terrorism, according to a government audit.

The audit concluded that the vetting process, initiated by the U.S. Agency for International Development and conducted by the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv, found no "derogatory information" on the Islamic University in Gaza between 2002 and 2006 -- even after Hamas claimed a parliamentary majority in Palestinian elections in 2006. Several times, university officials certified that they provided no material support for terrorism.

A companion audit found that USAID's operations in Gaza and the West Bank have largely implemented policies to keep future aid out of terrorist hands.

Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) asked USAID's inspector general to conduct the audits after a Washington Times report detailed some of the aid payments to Islamic University earlier this year. He said in an interview Tuesday that the failure to detect terrorist ties at the school suggested "either incompetence or a complete breakdown of the vetting system as run by the State Department." [Both?]

The U.S. designated Hamas a terrorist organization in 1997. Hamas' prime minister sits on the Islamic University's board of trustees. In January, Palestinian security forces seized assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades during a raid of the university...

The heart, she bleeds:

At 54, Norman Finkelstein is pretty much back where he started. This summer, the leftist scholar—who made a name for himself in 2000 with his book The Holocaust Industry, in which he called Jewish leaders a "repellent gang of plutocrats, hoodlums, and hucksters" intent on extorting war reparations from European governments—lost his job as assistant professor of political science at DePaul University. Fortunately, he kept the lease on his late father’s threadbare rent-stabilized apartment, on Ocean Parkway, and there he’s retreated.

"It’s like death," Finkelstein says. "You keep saying you’re going to die, but you never really come to grips with it. And I can see I’m not going to get another job. I haven’t yet fully absorbed it."

His days are now spent in solitary scholarly pursuits; his bookshelves buckle under the weight of tomes by Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky. Notes of support from his students sit on a piano; there’s a photo of him and Noam Chomsky ("my closest friend") bare-chested on the beach at Cape Cod.

He was a Maoist revolutionary in his youth. By his own account, his academic career was bedeviled from the start by his politics: It took him thirteen years to wrest his doctorate from Princeton, since no faculty member would agree to advise him on his thesis, an analysis of Zionism. When he finally did earn the degree, none would write him a recommendation. He went on to take a series of adjunct posts—at Brooklyn College, Hunter, and NYU—rarely earning more than $20,000 a year...

...[After being denied tenure at DePaul], Finkelstein says, he lost seventeen pounds. "People saw me wasting away," he says. A student group held a hunger strike; Chomsky and others defended him. One of his colleagues made him a mix CD with tracks like "I Will Survive" and "What’s Goin’ On?" "I’m an old fan of the Negro spirituals," Finkelstein says. "I was going around singing to myself, ‘Were you there when they crucified my Lord? Were you there?’ That’s how I felt. I was being crucified by the end."...

Get a job. Perhaps "heroic" Hizballah is hiring.

[h/t: Daniel H]

A couple of excerpts from the November report of the Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens' Rights:

...Compared to October, incidents of violations of the right to life and physical safety sharply dropped during November throughout the PNA-controlled territories. PICCR reported that 17 citizens were killed during incidents of, excessive use of force and infighting throughout the PA-controlled territories. Of these, 5 citizens were killed in the West Bank and 12 in the Gaza Strip, in comparison, 31 citizens were killed in October.

Of the striking remarks about incidents reported by PICCR, almost half of those citizens killed were victims of the excessive use of force, particularly by firearms used by Police forces affiliated with the deposed Palestinian government in the Gaza Strip and PNA security personnel in the West Bank: 8 citizens were reported to be killed by firearms in these incidents, including 7 in the Gaza Strip and 1 in the West Bank...

...Over the past month, several violations and aggressions were reported to have been committed against the freedom of opinion and expression in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. Most prominently was the incident reported on 12 November, when the Police force of the deposed government killed 7 citizens and injured dozens others while they were taking part in a peaceful gathering. On 27 November, PNA security forces also oppressed a number of peaceful demonstrations which protested against the Annapolis Conference. Moreover, security forces beat and injured a number of journalists in an attempt to prevent them from covering these demonstrations. In the city of Ramallah, security personnel beat Wael ash Shuyoukhi, Al Jazeera Satellite Channel correspondent, with clubs, leaving him a broken left arm. Moreover, security personnel beat Mu'ammar 'Urabi, Director of Watan Television Station, while he was reporting a similar demonstration in the city...

Here's the report: November 07 Report English Translation.pdf

[h/t: David Frankfurter]

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

memrihamaschildabuse.jpg

Not a science-fiction film of a dystopian future where children have taken over the world and now rule the adults like abusive dictators -- no, it's just another day on Hamas television. It's sick. It's always sick.

You've seen this act before, but the video must always be seen to be believed.

Children on Hamas TV Call to "Liberate" Al-Aqsa Mosque by Force and to "Wipe Out" Zionists to the Last One

The following are excerpts from a children's show which aired on Hamas Al-Aqsa TV on December 3, 2007.

Boy: "My beloved brothers, as you know, today the Al-Aqsa Mosque is crying out: 'Where are the people of the frontline, the Palestinian people?' Yes, my dear brothers, that is the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The subject of our lesson today is Jerusalem, to where your Prophet made his nocturnal journey – the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

"Yes, my beloved brothers, as you know today, and as you knew yesterday and the day before, the Al-Aqsa Mosque has fallen into oppressing and malicious hands, the hands of those who know nothing but injustice. But let me tell you how the Al-Aqsa Mosque will be returned, how we shall rescue it from the shackles of the occupation, from the shackles of the Zionist entity.

"Will it be through conferences? No, not through conferences, but by means of force, because the Zionist entity, your enemy, the enemy of Allah, the enemy of Islam, knows nothing but injustice and the killing of Palestinians, the persevering people on the frontline. Indeed, the [mosque] will be returned only by means of force.

"In 1917, the Balfour Declaration was issued. Balfour decided on the cleansing of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. But look what the Zionist enemy has done, look what Israel and America have done. Look what the allies of Israel and America have done. They have dug tunnels underneath the Al-Aqsa Mosque, but the sheikhs and mujahideen of the Al-Aqsa Mosque have exposed these tunnels and called upon the Palestinian people: 'Look what has happened, look what has happened.'

"These calls have gone unheeded, my beloved brothers. But is it too late? No, it is not too late. If we all unite, the Al-Aqsa Mosque will not remain in the hands of the Zionist enemy, it will not remain in the hands of your enemy, despite all their conspiracies against the Palestinian people."

[...]

Girl: "To Al-Aqsa, to Al-Aqsa – we shall unite our ranks. We will wipe out the people of Zion, and will not leave a single one of them."

MEMRI has a page dedicated to Al-Aqsa TV content, here.

I know, I know...who cares about Green-Rainbow's Grace Ross anymore? Well, I just wanted to congratulate anyone who voted for one of her opponents for the Worcester City Council -- ya done good. Grace is going to be speaking on a panel at that Boston "truther" convention I mentioned earlier. Respectable people do not lend their names to such events in any capacity:

The repercussions of 9/11 reverberate through our society as the world apprehensively awaits more preemptive attacks by the US against supposed terrorist enemies.

This program brings together a diverse group of speakers to address the draconian war measures such as the Patriot Act prepared with foreknowledge and enacted under the false pretense of the 9/11 attacks...

...With Ray McGovern, Nancy Murray, Grace Ross, Donna Marsh O’Connor, Robert Bowman, Barbara Honegger

Yes, that's the ACLU's Nancy Murray (I doubt there are two).

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Mark Davis in the Dallas Morning News: Deluded by hope of peace

...There were smiles aplenty, and why not? Everyone was on board with the "two-state solution," a scenario that recreates a country called Palestine. Presumably, this is where the long-suffering Palestinians finally will have a secure homeland, a place to enjoy the blessings of freedom and self-determination.

This is a laudable goal. But like throwing the car keys to a first-grader, it is hazardously premature.

I intend no metaphoric insult to Palestinians, as if they are not mature enough to self-govern. They are grown-ups who deserve to make their own leadership choices.

The sad thing is that their most recent choices, in what passes for elections in their war-torn territories, have been to embrace the blood-soaked rule of Hamas. Far too many Palestinians rejected Mr. Abbas' more moderate Fatah party to elect lawmakers whose policy goals include the violent eradication of Israel.

In a queasy irony, Mr. Olmert, the Israeli leader, nonetheless shares a gung-ho zeal for a headlong rush to a new Palestine.

At the State Department, deputy spokesman Tom Casey tried after the conference to destigmatize the Palestinian voters' hunger for terrorist leadership. "Those Hamas votes were based on a variety of things," he told me. "Hamas made various promises about economic reform and services to people that resonated among voters."

No kidding. But if a candidate comes to me and says he wants to cut taxes and government spending, but, by the way, he also wants to nuke Canada, that's going to be a deal-breaker...

Monday, December 10, 2007

In the interest of things other than politics and the struggle for survival of Western Civilization, let us take a detour and remind ourselves of what we are fighting for. (In other words, "And now for something completely different...")

What are the odds that in the same batch of Blockbuster rentals, I would choose movies that have scenes utilizing the exact same method of mass-zombie dispatch? Efficacious, but gas-guzzling: the chopper blade. Mind the splats.

28weekchop.jpg

28 Weeks Later is the follow up to the successful 28 Days Later. The sequel is good, but not quite as satisfying as the first.

planetterrorchop.jpg

Robert Rodriquez's Planet Terror is shot in the style of an old drive-in "grindhouse" low-budget flick -- complete with film noise and "missing reel." Great fun. Highly recommended. Not for kids. The film has a slight overlap with Quentin Tarantino's Death Proof, also part of the "grindhouse" series. Tarantino's film has its moments, but he's far too in love with his own dialogue for his own good.

In other news, I've recently played through the single player of both Crysis and Call of Duty 4. Both managed to test the limits of my graphics hardware. Crysis has the slight advantage in the graphical wow-factor department, but the motion captures in CoD4 are remarkable and do an amazing job at drawing one into the experience. The Crysis story-line, though based in North Korea, is pretty well pure fantasy, while CoD4's is reminiscent of the current global War on Terror.

Totten is required reading, as always:

..."I don't think people really know what to expect from any of this," he continued. "It's like people say: you only get the bad news on TV. They don't get to hear about how Fallujah is doing good now. I'm sure they'd hear about it if something bad happened. But these people are doing better, the schools are open, businesses are open, people are cleaning up their own city. They're starting their own neighborhood watch. They have their own police force now, their own government. People don't get to hear about that. I think that's important for people to know. You shouldn't focus so much on people who mess up. I mean, people have messed up. Bad stuff has happened. But you should focus on the percentage of people who are doing good as opposed to the percentage who are doing bad. There's a lot of good going on over here. And there's a lot of good people in this city."...

Please forward to the Presidential candidate of your choice.

Dhimmis or just Crusaders?

Muslim gunmen in the Gaza Strip tried to kill another Palestinian Christian over the weekend, sources in Gaza City told The Jerusalem Post.

They said four masked gunmen tried to kidnap Nabil Fuad Ayad, who works as a guard at a local church. Nabil's cousin, Rami, was kidnapped and murdered two months ago by the same group, the sources said.

The sources identified the gunmen as members of the radical Islamic Salafi movement.

"They were dressed in the traditional Salafi clothes" said an eyewitness. "They were also carrying guns."

The gunmen tried to force Ayad into their car as he was walking in the street, but he managed to escape to a nearby shop. Shopkeepers who began shouting drove the gunmen away.

As they fled the scene, the assailants fired several shots into the air...

...The Salafis, who have become very active in the Gaza Strip in recent months, are totally opposed to common Western concepts like economics, constitutions and political parties. They refer to the 2,500 Christians in the Gaza Strip as Crusaders and have vowed to drive them out of the area.

Hamas denied any involvement in the attack, saying its security forces had launched an investigation after receiving a complaint from the victim.

Christians living in the Gaza Strip told the Post that they were very worried about the increased attacks on members of their community and religious institutions. "The latest incident is aimed at sending a message to all the Christians here that we must leave," said a Christian leader. "Radical Islamic groups are waging a campaign to get rid of us and no one seems to care."

Just when you think you've seen it all. According to this posting from Togethernet (a net of psycho anti-Semites all together):

Well folks, at loong last, here it is--the speech that the president of Iran made specifically for the conference in southern Ca in October. enjoy and spread far and wide--

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5888665061097230933

You remember the conference.

A couple of days ago, Power Line posted:

Professor Alan Dershowitz, of the Harvard Law School, spoke before friends of the Hudson Institute in New York [yesterday]. Hudson Institute is a major think tank that conducts research to advance global security, prosperity and freedom.

Among other things, Professor Dershowitz revealed that Noam Chomsky, the radical leftist, had once been his camp counselor. Apparently, Counselor Chomsky did no lasting harm to [camper] Dershowitz.

Another thing Professor Dershowitz revealed tells us much about former President Jimmy Carter. It seems that when Carter appeared at Brandeis to plug his book Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid, he pledged to answer any questions that students e-mailed him afterward. Many took him up on the offer, and Carter did answer every question... except one. That one was this: Did you advise Yasser Arafat to reject the peace offer Israel made at Camp David, at the end of Clinton's term? According to Professor Dershowitz, some 15 students e-mailed that question, and they were the only students not to be answered...

Charles Jacobs emails:

Ok. Here is a challenge to the blogger world: how the hell do we mount a campaign to make Carter address that question?

I don't see how. We can only embarrass him for continually ducking it.

Sunday, December 9, 2007

It's a complex picture. Combine this with Avi Dichter's statements about the questionable loyalty of the city's Arab residents along with rumors of a surging Hizb ut-Tahrir presence to start building up a view of that complexity: A strange struggle for Jerusalem

...later initiatives to populate East Jerusalem were more successful, but the final result has remained a problem. Yehuda Tamir, who was put in charge of the task by prime minister Levi Eshkol, fulfilled it through large expropriations of land and rapid construction. He thus went against the opinion of a number of cabinet ministers, particularly Zerah Warhaftig and Menachem Begin, to "Judaize" the entire Old City. Tamir argued that evacuating the Old City's Muslim and Christian residents and rebuilding it would take a long time and entangle Israel in the international arena. It would be better to quickly determine facts on the ground via new construction. The first area he chose was the seam between West and East Jerusalem in the north of the city, where the neighborhoods of Givat Hamivtar, Ramot Eshkol and French Hill would be built. But Tamir's ostensibly logical considerations did not meet the test of reality: 40 years after he began his project, the neighborhoods he built are becoming home to Palestinian Arabs and ultra-Orthodox Jews, populations that are rapidly changing Jerusalem's character and status.

French Hill is being conquered by Arab residents - some of them Palestinians and some of them Israeli citizens - and that is the tip of the iceberg: 250,000 out of 450,000 people living in East Jerusalem are Palestinians who want to improve their housing conditions. Givat Hamivtar, Ramot Eshkol and nearby Ramot are changing their image: The secular or tolerant religious middle class are moving out, replaced by the ultra-Orthodox.

Jerusalem as a whole is losing its productive backbone and is deepening its dependence on state handouts. Young, secular, educated people able to earn a wage are leaving it in droves, followed by their parents. The city leadership is in the hands of ultra-Orthodox elected officials who imbue their managerial style with concepts derived from their world and priorities. This process stems from demographics whose significance is highlighted by the following projection: In about eight years the number of students in Jerusalem's ultra-Orthodox elementary schools will be more than three times the number of students in secular and religious public schools...

Tale of stolen vehicles

In a report earlier this week, a senior Palestinian police officer boasted that following their new deployment, Palestinian police were able to confiscate a total of 180 stolen Israeli vehicles. An Israeli reading this report would think: Look at that, Mahmoud Abbas is starting to put the house in order.

But let’s wait a moment. What do they mean by “confiscated?” What would a Swiss police officer do if his people seized vehicles stolen in Italy? We can assume he would call his counterparts in the Italian police force and hand over the vehicles to them. However, Palestinian police “confiscated” the vehicles.

In other words, the Palestinian police force is short on vehicles, so it confiscates stolen vehicles to meet its own needs. Up until yesterday, a vehicle would be used by the person who stole it, or by the person who bought it from the thief. As of today, this vehicle is being used by a Palestinian police officer.

As it turns out, the Palestinians have developed a unique and creative version of the "good cop, bad cop" routine. This week, we were told that three PA police officers were behind the recent murder of an Israeli man in Judea and Samaria. Two of them were detained by the IDF, while the third one was nabbed by Palestinian officers. So now we have police officers who are murderers and policemen who are thieves.

It is even possible that the murder suspect detained by the Palestinians was arrested by the thieves. Maybe he was even driven to the Jericho prison in a “confiscated” car, which up until recently belonged to an Israeli citizen, but has now been converted into a police cruiser - it no longer belongs to its rightful owner, but rather, serves Palestinian law enforcement officials (while boosting Mahmoud Abbas, of course.)

Forgive me for harping on an insignificant point like 30,000 stolen vehicles, while we have meaningful matters on the agenda such as the boosting of Abbas’ status and the forging of an international coalition of moderate Arabs. But still, before peace breaks out, where are all those tens of thousands of vehicles stolen from Israel?...

It's the little confidence building measures that count -- and show whether you're a real government, or just an ongoing tribal kleptocracy.

You may remember the recent story of the Palestinian Arab terrorists brought in by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) for training in International Humanitarian Law and First Aid. This story at the Ma'an News Agency about the program is really interesting for the black is white world it exposes -- a mirror-image land where terms don't mean what you think.

ICRC train resistance fighters in Gaza

gazatraining.jpg

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Gaza has recently begun training Palestinian resistance fighters to respect international humanitarian law.

For the past few years various Palestinian resistance factions in Gaza have fired crude homemade rockets at nearby Israeli towns, killing about a dozen Israeli civilians and recently injuring 69 soldiers in one such attack. The rockets usually land in open spaces but cause panic amongst Israeli civilians.

Ostensibly to prevent the firing of rockets into Israel and more likely to pressure the Palestinian civilian population into tempering their support of the resistance, the Israeli army has extrajudicially executed resistance activists, repeatedly invaded certain areas of Gaza and razed homes and agricultural land to make "buffer" zones near the Gaza-Israel border...

...This year, more than 100 Palestinians, mostly resistance activists, have been killed [Good shootin'!] during Israeli army air strikes on and incursions into Gaza...

Etc... Laugh, but this is the world we're supposed to be respecting every time we're told we need to respect the Middle Eastern world view.

They will if the Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center gets its way:

Shurat Hadin-Israel Law Center has filed a petition today [Dec. 6] in the High Court of Justice in Jerusalem asking that the Government Press Office (GPO) be compelled to revoke the press credentials of France 2 television staff and its Jerusalem bureau chief, Mr Charles Enderlin, in light of the network and its staff proceedings in the Muhamad al- Durrah "murder" affair.

On September 30, 2000, two days after the beginning of the Second Intifada, French television broadcasted worldwide footage showing the Palestinian child Muhammad al Durrah, crouched behind his father. The footage depicted al-Durrah and his father seeking cover during a gunfight near the Nezarim junction . In the footage, Enderlin attributed al-Durrah's death to the I.D.F despite the face he was not at the scene.

The images as seen in the broadcast, add to Enderlin's voice cover, caused a great shock worldwide, a wave of condemnations against the State of Israel and an increase in anti- Israeli violence in Israel...

The government of Israel has been extremely timid in this regard, so it'll be up to the citizens to do something.

I'm not big on boycotts generally, but this is interesting: America won’t be bullied by CAIR and radical Islamists!

"Support Freedom, Not Islamo-fascism" Holiday Patriot Campaign against Officemax,Walmart, Sears, JC Penny, ATT, Universal Orlando Resorts

Citizens for American Values in Public Education/Stop the Madrassa Community Coalition announce a powerful and multi-faceted initiative to push back hard against attempts by radical Islamist groups to silence American citizens through boycotts, name-calling, threats of lawsuits, defamatory accusations and other forms of intimidation.

Citizens for American Values president Stuart Kaufman stated: "We ourselves have been defamed and slandered as a result of our efforts to raise awareness about the Khalil Gibran International Academy (KGIA). Because of the depredations of CAIR and CAIR’s relationship with KGIA, Citizens for American Values/Stop the Madrassa has expanded its fight to a nationwide campaign against imposition of Islamist agendas in curricula, language programs, history classes, textbooks, teacher training, and charter schools."

A coalition of organizations will be taking the following strong actions:...

Read more

[h/t: LFayman]

Saturday, December 8, 2007

Friday, December 7, 2007

Here's a neat little optical illusion for you. In the extended entry is an image. Stare at the black dot in the middle of the image for about 30 seconds. Without moving your eyes, move your mouse over the image and it will change into a color image until the moment you move your eyes. Give it a try.

Other example and tutorial on how to create this are here.

Continue reading "Optical Illusion"

Archbishop Cranmer points out this story at CNSNews: Nativity Scene Modified to Make Political Point

A British charity is giving the traditional nativity scene a political twist this year by dividing it with a wall symbolizing Israel's controversial security barrier.
WalledNativity.jpg

The Amos Trust, a Christian group that works with needy communities around the world, is selling what it calls a nativity set with a difference -- one where "the wise men won't get to the stable."

Organizers say the purpose of the sets -- made by Palestinian carpenters with olive wood from Bethlehem -- is to draw attention to the security measures put in place by the Israeli government.

The network of walls and fences being built between Israeli and Palestinian Authority-controlled areas of the West Bank runs along the perimeter of Bethlehem, dividing it from nearby Jerusalem. Travel in and out of the town is heavily restricted.

The nativity scenes are available in a small version, for around $30, and a larger set -- "perfect for a church" -- goes for around $115. The wall in the larger version is detachable, the Amos Trust says, to allow for the possibility the situation may change in the future.

Garth Hewitt, director of the Amos Trust, said Wednesday his group wants to use the wooden sets to make people aware of what is happening, including how the Christian population of Bethlehem is rapidly shrinking...

Of course, the reason there is a wall is to prevent suicide bombers from entering Israel. Pressure on the Christian population has increased as the terrorists have made a point of launching attacks from Bethlehem in the past, knowing they would invite difficulties on the Christian population there. The Muslim population has also practiced outright intimidation as their own radicalism and population pressure has increased.

How sad to see a Christian group crassly corrupt their own traditions in the interest of parroting Jihadist propaganda. I suggest carrying little suicide bomber dolls to sub out for the Wise Men when you see this display. That'd make a point, too.

[h/t: Jeremy Jacobs]

Interesting, and I wish the Reverend luck, but I wonder how strong the basis for the suit really is: Dispute over planned construction targets controversial group's financial records

A Christian minister suing to halt the planned construction of a huge Florida mosque says he hopes to gain access to previously undisclosed financial information of the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations, which though nonprofit has not disclosed complete directories of its staff or advisory boards and has refused to make its federal tax filings readily available to the public...

...Now a Christian pastor in Pompano Beach, Fla., has filed a lawsuit to halt construction of a new mosque in a predominantly black neighborhood, a project planned by a local Islamic Center whose work is being supported by CAIR. The lawsuit may be used to access CAIR's financial records.

Rev. O'Neal Dozier, a former NFL player who now is minister at the Worldwide Christian Center, a church attended by about 600, told WND his lawsuit is over the plans for a nearly 30,000-square foot mosque in his church's neighborhood.

"What we're looking at now is that we have a hearing coming up in January of 2008," he said. "Of course, this hearing is on a motion by the Islamic Center and CAIR to dismiss our case. That's what they're trying to do.

"What we're trying to do right now, is we need to come up with the funds to do an adequate discovery," he said. "We need to do a very good one, depose all of the various persons on the other side, get all of the pertinent information, get their financial affidavits. We want to get copies of their books. We want to be able to get into their bank accounts."

He said the mosque in question, with a membership he estimated in the dozens, already has a facility in Pompano Beach, but the CAIR leaders say it is too small. They say they need the nearly 30,000-square foot facility on land near the Worldwide Christian Center, in the heart of a financially struggling neighborhood of mostly black residents.

Dozier charges that the only reason CAIR needs such a facility is for recruitment of membership into a cadre of citizens who share a hatred of whites and the U.S. government.

"In this area it would be a bad area to have a mosque, because they would have the potential of breeding terrorists," Dozier told WND. "I know them (the community members) well. Many of them are angry. They feel like they've been left out. They're angry at the government. Angry at the white man. It's just a terrible situation if they were to come in here …"...

He gets the program alright. That's exactly why they choose neighborhoods like Roxbury here in Boston -- fertile ground for Dawa. These are Saudi-funded edifices that couldn't possibly be afforded by the local communities. The Brotherhood comes in, build the house and then goes about filling the rooms. And what kind of Islam is going to be taught there do you suppose? Peaceful, reformist and patriotic? Don't bet on it.

[h/t: Miss Kelly]

lowneymasked.jpg
File Photo

Pete Lowney, the local "anti-Zionist" activist who frequently shows up masked (scroll down) to protest events went a step too far when he recorded a police officer against his wishes. Universal Hub has an in-depth report. Lowney and David Rolde are the dynamic dumbos of the local activist scene, and are no strangers (particularly Lowney) to confrontations with the police. According to the DA's press release, "an apparent ally [Jeffrey D. Manzelli] now also faces charges for allegedly threatening police witnesses in the case."

The press release is in the extended entry.

Continue reading "Local Anti-Jewish Activist Sentenced to 6 Months Probation and $500 Fine"

This is an important guest blog by Hillel Stavis concerning an event that occurred this past Tuesday (scroll down for audio):

Who is J. Lorand Matory and why is he saying those terrible things about Israel and Jews? And why is he "trembling with fear" these days at Harvard University?

Mr. Matory is Professor of Anthropology and of African American and African Studies at Harvard. According to his recent oped in the Harvard Crimson, he "trembles with fear" at the power of the Israel Lobby.

For over 30 years I considered myself an "unofficial" member of the Harvard Community. I founded WordsWorth Books in 1976 and for nearly three decades our bookshop prided itself on serving the Harvard community and welcoming hundreds of authors to speak, regardless of the controversial nature of their writings. In 1989 we were scheduled as the only bookstore in America to host Salman Rushdie just before the death edict was issued against him by the Mullahs of Iran. When the publisher cancelled his appearance for security reasons, we presented a distinguished panel to discuss the state of free speech in the publishing world. We hosted Jimmy Carter twice and Tariq Ali, a voluble critic of Israel. Hardly a week went by without a Harvard graduate walking into WordsWorth thanking us for being a unique venue for ideas or recounting how they had met their future spouse in our Psychology aisle.

WordsWorth was forced to cease operations (like hundreds of other independent bookstores) primarily as a result of the onslaught of Amazon.com and the "big box" stores of Barnes & Noble and Borders.

For nearly twenty years I was a supporter of our local NPR affiliate, WBUR. In the late ‘90s I decided to stop advertising on that station because, in my opinion, the balance and objectivity so often trumpeted by them was absent when it came to one issue: The Arab Israeli conflict. After a number of meetings with the then head of WBUR, Jane Christo and the President of NPR, Kevin Klose, in which I expressed my concerns, I decided to end my relationship with the station. One particular example of the lack of fairness I cited was the complete failure to report on what has often been called "The Forgotten Exodus," namely, the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Arab lands that occurred from 1948 to 1968. Just recently, official Arab documents have been disclosed proving collusion by their governments in the expulsion of Jewish citizens. While NPR had presented scores of stories of Arabs who fled Israel after the 1948 war (it is still a matter of debate whether most fled or were expelled), I claimed that in the network’s 30 year history not one story had been aired concerning the Jewish "forgotten refugees." I challenged Mr. Klose to find even one story that NPR had aired on this subject. After about three weeks I received an email form him citing an interview with Andre Aciman, a distinguished man of letters and author of the memoir, Out of Egypt, that was aired on the Terry Gross show, Fresh Air. During the interview, Mr. Aciman remarked that his family had to "leave Egypt" in the 1950’s. Of course, Ms. Gross’s interview did not focus on the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Jews from Arab lands where they had built thriving communities thousands of years old. Mr. Aciman’s remark was a passing one, a small part of a discussion of his literary oeuvre.

Why am I dredging up this "ancient history" now, you might ask? Well, a few days ago, I decided to spend my lunch hour attending a lecture by Professor Matory, whose recent op ed in The Harvard Crimson stirred up so much controversy. I had never met nor even laid eyes on Professor Matory before his lecture. Imagine my surprise when halfway through his disquisition on Israel and its alleged atrocities against Palestinians, he began talking about me personally, by name, and my decision – more than six years ago - to stop supporting NPR. Professor Matory announced to his audience that I "led a highly damaging donor boycott of WBUR on the grounds that it allegedly broadcast pro-Palestinian points of view too freely." He made no reference to the substantive and, at the time, published reasons I gave for my withdrawing my support. To my amazement, I was being demonized by the professor for exercising my right not to contribute to certain organizations.

During the Q and A period, I stood up and introduced myself to Professor Matory, who was, understandably, quite chagrined by my presence. I challenged him to provide evidence that I "led a highly damaging donor boycott". He provided no evidence other than referring to a Boston Globe article which he claimed appeared in 2002. There was indeed an article in The Boston Globe that year, but it simply recounted the picketing of my store by anti-Israel activists.

My decision to stop advertising was a personal one, reluctantly undertaken by what I perceived as a betrayal of NPR’s mandatory and self-proclaimed policy of balance and fairness. I never led a boycott, nor solicited anyone else to stop funding WBUR. As to his charge that exercising my democratic right not to fund organizations I disagreed with amounted to a "highly damaging" campaign, I reminded him that NPR boasts 860 radio outlets in all 50 states, a budget of hundreds of millions of dollars a year and prides itself on reaching more than 25 million listeners a week. The lower end of the FM broadcast spectrum is reserved for NPR from coast to coast and its affiliates receive their federal licenses free of charge. Their demographics reveal their listeners to be in the top 1% of American earners, the elite of American media consumers. NPR is the "establishment" when it comes to the American university community. The notion that a single, independent bookstore can "damage" one of the largest media outlets in the country is ludicrous.

Professor Matory did not stop at slandering only me. He went on to excoriate another independent bookstore, The Harvard Bookstore, for allegedly yielding to pressure from Professor Alan Dershowitz in dis-inviting Norman Finkelstein from appearing there. Yet a casual glance at the Harvard Bookstore’s titles hostile to Israel vs. those supporting Israel will yield an enormous imbalance favoring the former. Nor would The Harvard Book Store agree to carry a book critical of Noam Chomsky; hardly the profile of a business controlled by "The Israel Lobby."

Just last week, Harvard hosted Noam Chomsky and two passionate pro-Palestinian speakers at the Law School to an overflow crowd of cheering supporters. Rather than "trembling with fear" as Professor Matory puts it, it would seem that his point of view expresses itself whenever and wherever it wants on campus to large, approving audiences.

While decrying the purported "witch hunt" atmosphere on college campuses in general and Harvard, in particular, by "The Israel Lobby" and portraying himself as a victim of a Jewish conspiracy he revealed more than a bit of the paranoid style.

But what is most disturbing about Professor Matory’s apparent obsession with Israel and Jews (at one point he referred to "a moneyed and media connected American Israeli defense force" – I guess we can dispense with the usual coded language observation) is the unavoidable realization that for Professor Matory who was at the epicenter of ousting Larry Summers, ostensibly for sexist remarks, Israel was the primary trigger. It seems clear that for Professor Matory, Summers’ original sin was his opposition to the Harvard divestment - from - Israel campaign expressed long before his (in)famous speech on women in the sciences.

It would seem that Professor Matory has a bad case of Jews-on-the brain. He is beset by Israeli colonizers and their minions on campus: Practitioners of "character assassination, dis-invitation, and other losses of career opportunities campaign contributions, income or friends, and, above all, the damage done by fervent Zionists to the process of intellectual inquiry and debate in this university". By dis-invitation, he was referring to the wide opposition to the Harvard English Department’s invitation to Tom Paulin, an Irish poet who has called for the murder of all Jewish settlers, including men, women and children (a position predictably skipped over by the Professor). Continuing his breathless rant he claimed that even his teaching compensation was not off limits for the vaporous cabal: "Even my annual salary is set by officials who appear to feel threatened by my bringing up this issue."

That a tenured professor is so driven by hatred of Israel, who sees sinister forces plotting against him at every turn and who spearheaded the successful campaign to unseat Larry Summers speaks volumes about power, not powerlessness. Dr. Johnson famously referred to patriotism as "the last refuge of a scoundrel". Were he still with us, he might want to substitute the word, "university" for "patriotism."

Alan Dershowitz wrote about Matory a few days ago here: "Free Speech For Me, But Not for Thee!", as did Richard Cravatts here: The Academic Shield.

Here is the audio of Stavis's confrontation with Professor Matory. First, I have isolated the portion of Matory's talk where he discusses WordsWorth (he repeats the accusation during the Q&A -- not included here), then I have inserted a pause of three seconds and we hear Stavis confronting Matory during the Q&A. Hillel becomes rather emotional, but that's nothing to be ashamed of. It must be tough to sit still while someone tells lies about a business you ran for most of your life:

Here is audio of the entire talk:

Note how Matory spends the first minutes of his talk in an extended version of "Some of my best friends are Jews." My impression of Matory from the little I've heard is that he knows very little of the subject. What we have here is the poison of postcolonial theory. It gives him all he needs to know: He has his good guys, his bad guys and his framework for making declaratory statements -- details and facts are mere inconveniences with slogans ready to hand. Here's a clue: Whenever you hear someone make a blanket statement about every authority on International Law agreeing that the Arab refugees of 1948 must be allowed back into what is now the Nation of Israel, you know they're talking politics, not facts.

I have a feeling we haven't heard the last of this matter.

Update: Thanks to those who have linked, including Martin Kramer, Anti-Racist Blog, Atlas, and PowerLine (who also link to their own Matory coverage -- worth having a look).

Update 2: Joel Pollak has a very good report on the talk.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Power Line has the video and transcript of Mitt Romney's speech. I thought it was a very good, perhaps memorable, bit of American political prose. Well done. Less an explanation of Romney's Mormon faith (he says the word "Mormon" only once) than an explanation of the intersection of faith and American politics. In that, very effective.

Anti-Racist Blog has the story of the Indiana University Jewish Center and some acts of vandalism it has had to endure lately:

...The letters spelling the word "Jewish" were pried from the front of the student center in November.

"We thought it was really like a message, and we cannot tolerate that," Chincholker said.

Students said a beer bottle was thrown threw the center's window in October.

"They were just watching a video when the bottle went through the window. They thought it was gunfire. That's how strong it was," Chincholker said...

There is information there on how one can express support for the Jewish students at IU.

Thank God for the First Ammendment: Dead man writing

...Up north, the Canadian Islamic Congress announced the other day that at least two of Canada’s "Human Rights Commissions" – one federal, one provincial – had agreed to hear their complaints that their "human rights" had been breached by this "flagrantly Islamophobic" excerpt from my book, as published in the country’s bestselling news magazine, Maclean’s. Several readers and various Canadian media outlets have enquired what my defense to the charges is. Here’s my answer:

I can defend myself if I have to. But I shouldn’t have to.

If the Canadian Islamic Congress wants to disagree with my book, fine. Join the club. But, if they want to criminalize it, nuts. That way lies madness. America Alone was a bestseller in Canada, made all the literary Top Ten hit parades, Number One at Amazon Canada, Number One on The National Post’s national bestseller list, Number One on various local sales charts from statist Quebec to cowboy Alberta, etc. I find it difficult to imagine that a Canadian "human rights" tribunal would rule that all those Canadians who bought the book were wrong and that it is beyond the bounds of acceptable (and legal) discourse in Canada...

[via Michelle Malkin]

And, if his debate performance against Daniel Dennett is any indication, he's right in being proud of an 0-3 record against his opponents. As others have done, D'Souza notes the vitriol many of the Atheist crowd reacts to him with: Why Atheists Are So Angry

If you haven't, you should read the comments in response to my recent debate with philosopher Daniel Dennett both here as well as on the atheist site richarddawkins.net. From the atheists you hear statements like this: "D'Souza is a goddamned idiot." "Odious little toad." "D'Souza is full of shit." "A smug, joyless twit." "Total moron." "Little turd." "Two-faced liar." Etc, etc. Now admittedly the topic of God v. atheism can be an emotional one, but you will find no comparable invective on the Christian side. Why then are so many atheists so angry? One reason I think is that they are God-haters. Atheists often like to portray themselves as "unbelievers" but this is not strictly accurate. If they were mere unbelievers they would simply live their lives as if God did not exist...

I think anger at God, or the idea of God, is one factor. But I think the larger factor is that Atheists (and agnostics) see religious people as imposing anti-rational rules and regulations on them without their permission. Signing someone's name to a social contract without their permission is a sure-fire guarantee for bloody revolution.

[h/t: Daniel for the link]

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

This is unbelievable. The clueless Boston FBI has actually given an award to a Boston Redevelopment Authority employee, Muhammad Ali-Salaam, who should have been dismissed long ago. Those who followed the Islamic Society of Boston's discount land deal and lawsuit saga will remember that the group got a massive discount on the land upon which they were to build their Boston Mosque. As part of the discovery process stemming from the ISB's failed lawsuit, Ali-Salaam's role as a double-dealing insider came clearly to light, with the city employee playing a dual role with both the city and the ISB, at once representing the public interest as well as advising the ISB on how to get the best deal possible out of the taxpayers.

...A large number of disclosures have involved the ISB’s ultimate insider, Muhammad Ali-Salaam. Ali-Salaam was simultaneously involved with the ISB as its principal Middle East fundraiser and a confidential adviser to the ISB board, while also serving as Deputy Director for Planning with the Boston Redevelopment Authority and working on the ISB deal as part of his official duties. While in the BRA he shepherded the ISB’s efforts, traveled to the Middle East on fundraising junkets, advised the ISB on the proper way to deal with the city in order to get the best deal possible, and attempted to arrange a trip to Saudi Arabia for Mayor Menino and some of the Mayor’s supporters (the trip never came off)...

Both the Islamic Society of Boston and the Muslim American Society are widely believed to be affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now it turns out, according to this announcement at the Muslim American Society's site that: Boston Muslim Community Leader Receives Law Enforcement Award

The Muslim American Society of Boston (MAS Boston) and the Islamic Council of New England congratulate Mr. Muhammad Ali-Salaam for receiving the Director's Community Leadership Award from the FBI Boston office.

Mr. Ali-Salaam has been a long time representative of the Muslim community and a founding member of the BRIDGES forum (Building Respect in Diverse Groups to Enhance Sensitivity). BRIDGES is a monthly meeting that gathers representatives of the various Law Enforcement agencies, civil liberties organizations, and various communities and organizations including the Muslim American Society and Islamic Council of New England. BRIDGES aims to fulfill the necessary role of establishing necessary communication channels to dispel myths, function efficiently and to remind of the importance of both Law Enforcement's role, and civil rights.

Mr. Ali-Salaam has also worked with the U.S. Department of Justice to deliver lectures and presentations on Islam and Muslims, which have reached thousands of local law enforcement personnel in the past few years.

Last month, the Los Angeles Police Department scrapped its controversial plan to map their Muslim communities upon strong rejection from Muslim community leaders and civil rights organizations. This recent event is an example of the importance of establishing strong and trusted channels of communication between the Muslim community and Law Enforcement.

In the post-9/11 climate, Law Enforcement may be tempted to employ means or approaches towards ensuring safety but which would harm and breach the rights of Muslims in America. It is therefore essential for the Muslim community to be at the table with Law Enforcement to voice their concerns and establish a working partnership based on integrity and transparency.

Integrity and transparency? Good grief. No group has done more to hide its role, refuse to answer questions and come forward with documents in the Mosque deal than Muhammad Ali-Salaam's BRA.

This award is an insult to the victims of the ISB's failed suit.

Update: Even more from Miss Kelly: Muhammad Ali-Salaam Given Award by the FBI?!

Further on the issue of believers v. the "New Atheists", non-believer Theodore Dalrymple has an excellent one in City Journal: What the New Atheists Don’t See - To regret religion is to regret Western civilization.:

...The curious thing about these books is that the authors often appear to think that they are saying something new and brave. They imagine themselves to be like the intrepid explorer Sir Richard Burton, who in 1853 disguised himself as a Muslim merchant, went to Mecca, and then wrote a book about his unprecedented feat. The public appears to agree, for the neo-atheist books have sold by the hundred thousand. Yet with the possible exception of Dennett’s, they advance no argument that I, the village atheist, could not have made by the age of 14 (Saint Anselm’s ontological argument for God’s existence gave me the greatest difficulty, but I had taken Hume to heart on the weakness of the argument from design).

I first doubted God’s existence at about the age of nine. It was at the school assembly that I lost my faith. We had been given to understand that if we opened our eyes during prayers God would depart the assembly hall. I wanted to test this hypothesis. Surely, if I opened my eyes suddenly, I would glimpse the fleeing God? What I saw instead, it turned out, was the headmaster, Mr. Clinton, intoning the prayer with one eye closed and the other open, with which he beadily surveyed the children below for transgressions. I quickly concluded that Mr. Clinton did not believe what he said about the need to keep our eyes shut. And if he did not believe that, why should I believe in his God? In such illogical leaps do our beliefs often originate, to be disciplined later in life (if we receive enough education) by elaborate rationalization...

Really good stuff.

Via Barney Zwartz at The Age from whence we find this further exchange.

New England ADL head Andy Tarsy has resigned. We wish him the best: ADL's regional leader resigns

Andrew H. Tarsy, the regional director of the Anti-Defamation League New England office, announced his resignation yesterday, the culmination of a months-long dispute with the national organization over its failure to fully acknowledge the Armenian genocide of 1915.

Tarsy informed the national office of his departure Friday and alerted co-workers and friends yesterday. In a phone interview, he did not elaborate on the reason for his departure, calling it "a professional judgment based on knowing when it's your time."

But supporters said it was clearly the result of his rift with the ADL's national director, Abraham H. Foxman, over the genocide issue.

"At the end of the day, the vision of the New England leadership and Abe Foxman's leadership were simply not fully compatible," said Steve Grossman, a former member of the ADL New England board. Tarsy "realized that he would have to make too many compromises that he was not prepared to make. I think he leaves with his integrity intact, with his head held high."...

The entire situation is gag-worthy. Sadly, a lot of people with other, anti-ADL and anti-Jewish -- not pro-Armenian -- agendas have made a difficult and complicated issue worse.

Update: Another view at JR Telegraph.

Here's another one making the rounds. Haven't you ever wanted to go into the past with a video camera to witness and film the past? That's what this is like -- the Dark Ages with production values. Every American should watch this. This is what the culture war is about, and why we need to be concerned with immigration and institutions telling us we need to "respect the other" without major conditions attached.

memriinfidels1.jpg

MEMRI TV: Muslim Scholars Debate Apostates in Islam

Following are excerpts from a debate on apostates in Islam, which aired on Al-Risala TV on November 5, 2007.

...Al-Sweidan: Before the break, I asked our audience for their views on this important issue. Does a Muslim have the liberty or the right to change his religion? The results are as follows: 24% said: "Yes, he has the right to change his religion." 76% of the people said: "No." Let's hear some opinions and then I will return to out guests...

...Audience member: Sir, if you become an apostate, your punishment is death. There is a great problem that most of us, 70% of us, are Muslims because they were born to Muslim fathers and mothers. Before a person converts to Islam, he has the liberty to choose, but remember that if you want to convert from Islam, you will be punished by death. So you have the liberty to choose, but on the condition...

Al-Sweidan: That's not liberty.

memriinfidels2.jpg

Audience member: It has conditions...

Al-Sweidan: What you are saying is: You have the right to become an apostate, but I will kill you.

Audience member: That's right. I won't tell him not to.

Al-Sweidan: What can be worse than being killed?

Audience member: That's why he will not become an apostate...

There is much more, including one outnumbered man arguing for free will:

Gamal Al-Bana: I believe that the freedom of thought and belief is absolute, because this freedom of thought leads to freedom of political opposition, which established democracy and got rid of kings and tyranny. It also led to freedom of the sciences, which has led progress, and freedom of justice, which led to fair treatment for laborers and women. Freedom of thought is indivisible, and the most important element of freedom is one's belief, because it has to do with one's conscience. Therefore, it cannot be restricted in any way.

He's outnumbered. We can only wish him luck. Watch the video or read the transcript.

One you may have seen already, but still...

issues04120407.jpg

IBD: Hyping Hate Crime Vs. Muslims

Not only are anti-Islamic hate crimes way down, but they're a fraction of overall religious hate crimes. The overwhelming majority of such crimes target Jews, something CAIR and other Muslim groups don't seem all that concerned about.

In 2006, a whopping 66% of religiously motivated attacks were on Jews, while just 11% targeted Muslims, even though the Jewish and Muslim populations are similar in size. Catholics and Protestants, who together account for 9% of victims, are subject to almost as much abuse as Muslims in this country.

Last year's anti-Islamic hate crimes totaled 156. While just one hate crime is one too many, that's a 68% drop from 2001.

The FBI report gives lie to CAIR's alarmist narrative of "Islamophobic" lynch mobs marching on mosques across America. In reality, Americans have been remarkably, and admirably, tolerant and respectful of Muslims and their institutions since 9/11.

It's plain that CAIR, which claims to be the "Muslim NAACP," has been hyping tensions...

...By crying wolf, CAIR shows it cares more about furthering its own political agenda than protecting ordinary Muslims. When real abuses occur, few Americans may pay attention. So CAIR is actually doing the Muslim community it claims to represent a disservice by hyping hate crimes.

CAIR should spend more time condemning the real threat from Islamic terrorists, not American vigilantes.

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

WorldNetDaily has a good one on CAIR and all their directors and employees who have been the subjects of terror investigations and the like. Good resource: CAIR called 'turnstile' for terrorist suspects

As the Council on American-Islamic Relations lobbies Congress to help strike its name from a list of co-conspirators in a federal terror case, WND has learned the Muslim group's ties to terrorism and extremism are far more extensive than first believed.

Although CAIR is a nonprofit organization, it does not disclose complete directories of its staff or advisory boards, and even refuses to make its federal tax filings readily available to the public.

But a review of federal criminal court documents, past IRS 990 tax records and Federal Election Commission records detailing donor occupations, reveals that Washington-based CAIR has been associated with a disturbing number of convicted terrorists or felons in terrorism probes, as well as suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations.

"Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters," said one FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials.

As previously reported, three CAIR officials have been linked to terrorism. But WND has learned that at least 11 other CAIR officials have been caught up in terror investigations, bringing the total to 14.

Congressional leaders say they are warning lawmakers and other Washington officials to disassociate from the group due to its growing terror ties...

The fourteen are discussed in the article: Muthanna al-Hanooti, Laura Jaghlit, Abdurahman Alamoudi (of Islamic Society of Boston fame), Nihad Awad, Omar Ahmad, Nabil Sadoun, Mohamed Nimer, Rafeeq Jaber, Rabith Hadid, Siraj Wahhaj, Randall "Ismail" Royer, Bassam Khafagi, Ghassan Elashi, and Hamza Yusuf.

Richard Cravatts in the Emory school paper:

...Critics worldwide denounced both the theme and intent of the book, causing Carter to contend, as other Israel-bashers have also done, that it is difficult to openly criticize the Jewish state, that he had felt "severe restraints on any free and balanced discussion of the facts," and that supporters of Israel, in his view, try to suppress criticism, stifle debate and intimidate those who speak against the country’s policies.

Just this month at Harvard University, Professor L. Roland Matory expressed a similar notion when he said that there was "widespread censorship of dissent about Israel-Palestine." That alleged censorship had made him feel "unsafe," the same sensation experienced by Carter, no doubt, as he toured college campuses with his view that Israel was singularly at fault for the chronic suffering of the Palestinians.

Matory and Carter are not the first to bemoan the oppressive and fearful might of pro-Israel forces in stifling any criticism or discussion of Israel: Their outrage and trepidations might inspire sympathy save for the inconvenient fact that the sheer volume and frequency of chronic, unrelenting, vitriolic and one-sided demonization of Zionism and Israel on campuses worldwide makes both Matory’s and Carter’s claims of being cowered into silence by Israel’s supporters a bit disingenuous...

[h/t: Joanne]

I happen to know that L. Roland Matory was confronted this afternoon at a presentation he was making at Harvard by the very person he had been telling untruths about in that very presentation (Advice: when slandering (their word) someone in public, try to know what they look like so that you don't inadvertently do it to their face). More on this soon, I hope. Stay tuned.

Update: Professor Cravatts was kind enough to send in the original, pre-edit piece (better). I have posted it in full in the extended entry.

Continue reading "The Academic Shield (Update)"

Marty Federman continues his journeys in the Holy Land: Marty Federman's 2007 Visit Journal - Entry # 7

Had a very laid back day trying to recuperate from the stress, physical and emotional, of the trip to Twana and Tubah yesterday. Did some reading, then walked to Siraj to “connect.” They were closed (it’s Sunday near Bethlehem, of course) so I sat in the stairwell and used the WiFi to catch up with some e-mail (including the distressing one from Alan re: my appearance on the Solomonica blog. Got lost walking back, but nice people in a little store (which was open) directed me home...

Solomonica, Solomania...the best yet has been Salmanila...whatever. Get some rest and stick to the bottled water, Marty.

From Palestinian Media Watch: Hitler – Hero of "Voice of Palestine" contest. Winner who guesses "Hitler" - wins 600 Shekel

Hitler's military victories cited in detail; Holocaust is not a part of Hitler's history

"His golden year was 1940, when his armies invaded Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, Holland, and Belgium and defeated France ... By mid 1942, his country controlled the largest land area in Europe… He refused to surrender and continued to fight for two more years, but, his bitter end came in the spring of 1945 when he took his own life…. Who is he?" [From Voice of Palestine radio contest, Nov. 27, 2007]

Introduction:

This text is just part of the official Palestinian radio Ramadan quiz that was rebroadcast this past week, whose hero was Hitler. The full broadcast presents Hitler heroically, detailing his 2 Medals' of Honor in World War 1, his rise to power, his launching of World War 2 and specifies country after country that he conquered. His victories in 1940 are coined "his golden year", while his defeat and death are coined: "his bitter end."

Not surprisingly, though citing his victories and "bitter" fall in great detail, the Holocaust is not mentioned. This is consistent with Palestinian education in general which erases the Holocaust from history. See recent full PMW report [PDF] and bulletin on new 12th grade Palestinian history schoolbook, in which many pages are dedicated to the history of World War 2 and even to Nazi racism, but neither Jews nor the Holocaust are mentioned.

Admiration of Hitler in the Palestinian Authority

It may be surprising to Western observers to see official Palestinian radio presenting Hitler heroically. But it is important to understand that the revulsion of Hitler expected in the West is not true in Palestinian society. Palestinians can be found who are named "Hitler" as a first name: Hitler Salah [Al Hayat Al Jadida (Fatah), Sept. 28, 2005], Hitler Abu-Alrab [Al Hayat Al Jadida (Fatah), Jan. 27, 2005], Hitler Mahmud Abu-Libda [Al Hayat Al Jadida (Fatah), Dec.18, 2000.] Articles have appeared in both Fatah and Hamas newspapers which demonstrate Hitler's admired status.

The following is the full text of the "Voice of Palestine" contest in which guessing Hitler's name will win a prize of 600 Shekel, followed by a selection of past articles from both Fatah and Hamas newspapers that have demonstrate Hitler's admired status....

See PMW for transcript.

Monday, December 3, 2007

This is a re-post of the piece I did for Pajamas Media a few weeks back. First linked to here. PJM posted it here. This was my original submitted text. Not sure if they made any changes.

Joe McCarthy's been dead half a century and still can’t get any rest. Every time the left feels a critical breath down the back of its collective neck, genetic memory kicks in and out come the picks and shovels to exhume the old corpse and prop it up to scare the bejesus out of the villagers. Like Marley’s ghost, you’d imagine that McCarthy’s remains are so weighted down with the chains of frivolous citations that it would finally become an embarrassment to display him any longer. After all, he’s so bound up with unwarranted examples he can’t even spin in his grave respectably any more. Why they put Lenin under glass is anyone’s guess. Tailgunner Joe would have served a far more practical purpose.

None of this, of course, has prevented leftist mouthpiece The Nation from having one more go-round with that desiccated metaphor in an article by Larry Cohler-Esses entitled "The New McCarthyism." This must be the 20 or 30th "new" McCarthyism I’ve read about. Perhaps this is the "New and Improved" McCarthyism, or the "New, Enhanced Formula" McCarthyism…whatever. I do know one thing, there was only one "McCarthyism," and it was buried with its namesake. To the extent the echoes may still be heard, this ain’t it.

So what’s the beef now? Big surprise, the campus left is angry, no indignant, no outraged that peons, veritable villagers with torches and pitchforks why, the hoi polloi -- joined by a rabble of ex-academics they thought safely confined in exile on the Elba of privately-funded think-tanks along with a rag-tag remnant of remaining on-campus colleagues they had previously imagined were properly dhimmified and quiescent, not one of whom wields any governmental, or even administrative power – are storming the walls of the ivory tower and daring to take a look at the work of the next generation of academic wunderkind. Why, don’t we know who they are?

The answer is yes, we’re getting a pretty good idea, and the more interested we get, the more worried they get that the party may be coming to an end and many of the campus elite may be exposed as the glorified basket-weavers they are – or should be.

The first, to follow Cohler-Esses, is Barnard College’s tenure track Anthropologist, Nadia Abu El Haj. Her book, Facts on the Ground, has caused quite a stir. Such a stir, in fact, that the usual dismissive wave of the hand and mutter of "Let them eat PhD theses" will no longer suffice.

Continue reading "The New 'New McCarthyism': Are Left-Wing Academics Being Persecuted?"

This is the same Fred Toben from the Adelaide Institute who attended and spoke at the whacko Jew-haters' conference our own Joachim Martillo spoke at.

An Australian Holocaust denier has withdrawn his apology.

Dr. Fredrick Toben of the revisionist Adelaide Institute said Friday he would defy orders to purge offensive Holocaust denial material from his Web site. Three days earlier he had apologized "unreservedly" for defying a federal court order.

In 2002, Toben was ordered to remove material doubting the existence of gas chambers and extent of the Holocaust following a case brought against him by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

After apologizing Tuesday in an Adelaide court and pledging to remove all the offensive material by the following week to avoid a possible jail term, Toben published a response on his Web site saying he would not remove the banned content.

Toben also told reporters his institute would continue to debate the "many contentious issues of this so-called Holocaust."

The executive council said it could resume the case if Toben refused to follow the court's order and continued to breach the Racial Discrimination Act.

Like any bureaucracy, it doesn't want to disemploy itself, and Israel has problem...because it doesn't want the burden to fall on itself. Asaf Romirowsky and Jonathan Spyer in the Washington Times:

...Understanding the way that UNRWA helps perpetuate the Palestinian refugee problem requires taking a closer look at the way that the agency functions. Doing so reveals the workings of a dysfunctional bureaucracy.

While Palestinian refugees benefit materially from UNRWA, the agency benefits in return from the refugees. The refugees are the organization's raison d'etre. And bureaucracies tend to dislike dissolving themselves. So, like any good bureaucracy, UNRWA has zero incentive to resolve the Palestinian refugee problem if it is to continue to exist. Ending the refugee problem would render UNRWA obsolete.

Instead, UNRWA finds a hundred and one ways to perpetuate Palestinian dependency. The interests of the refugees and UNRWA are fatally intertwined; UNRWA is staffed mainly by local Palestinians — more than 23,000 of them — with only about 100 international United Nations professionals. Tellingly, while the U.N. High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR) and UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) avoid employing locals who are also recipients of agency services, UNRWA does not make this distinction. Terrorism does not exclude one from being a part of UNRWA. In fact, quite the opposite is true: UNRWA-overseen hospitals and clinics routinely employ members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Employing Palestinians for decade after decade and providing them with subsistence-level food aid and rudimentary education are a far cry from giving them usable skills and a positive attitude about creating their own independent economy and viable civic institutions.

In addition, the Palestinian agenda (and sympathy for the Palestinian cause) have infiltrated every aperture at Turtle Bay. UNWRA has spent decades keeping this single issue, key to the organization's survival, at the forefront of the U.N. agenda whether it belongs there or not. It has engendered Arab and Western support for the delegitimation of Israel, and facilitated comparisons between Nazism and Zionism — a false linkage that bolsters Palestinian claims of oppression. When former Secretary-General Kofi Annan appeared at a U.N. "Palestine Day" event which astonishingly featured a map of the Middle East that conspicuously omitted Israel, it was emblematic of the way in which the United Nations has transformed itself into a propaganda machine for such thinking. UNRWA has no parallel in the U.N. system. UNRWA is dedicated solely to providing assistance to Palestinian refugees; no other group of refugees, whatever their circumstances, warrants this much attention...

Haaretz: Four men get heavy sentences for rape, kidnap of 4 women, girls

The Haifa District Court on Monday handed down heavy sentences for four men from the village of Bir al-Maksour in the Galilee, convicted of raping and kidnapping four young hitchhikers from the north.

The four were also convicted - in the framework of a plea bargain - of conspiring to commit crimes. The acts attributed to them took place between December 2005 and November 2006.

The harshest sentence handed down is for 20 years in prison and a three- year suspended sentence for Salem Hujeirat. His cousin, Ala Hujeirat, was given 15 years in jails and a three-year suspended sentence. Ruhi Hujeirat and Mohammed Radir received nine years in jail and a three-year suspended sentence each.

The court also ordered the men to pay a total of NIS 190,000 to the complainants.

The indictment against the men charges them with the rape of a female soldier kidnapped at knifepoint and three other kidnappings - of a 16-year-old girl in Kiryat Bialik, a 26-year-old woman from a bus station near Bir al-Maksour and a 13-year-old girl...

The Haaretz story leaves out the nationalistic motivations of the case. This is from the Jerusalem Post article written at the time they were arrested:

A gang of serial rapists has been prowling the North, raping Jewish women as revenge for IDF actions in the West Bank, police revealed Tuesday after arresting six suspects.

"We are raping Jews because of what the IDF is doing to the Palestinians in the territories," one of the six suspects told investigators from the Northern District Central Investigative Unit (CIU) during questioning. During their questioning and their brief appearance at the Nazareth Magistrate's Court Tuesday, none of the four main suspects indicated that they felt remorse for their actions.

Police said they were aware of four attacks carried out by the gang, but they believed there were probably other incidents that had gone unreported by the victims...

memrialazhar.jpg

MEMRI TV: Ahmad Al-Tayyib, Al-Azhar University President and Former Mufti of Egypt, Justifies Palestinian Suicide Bombings

Ahmad Al-Tayyib: We do not permit the killing or terrorizing of peaceful people, when two countries, two armies, or two forces confront one another. This is forbidden, even if the Muslim forces are being defeated. But with regard to Palestine and Israel, this is not the case, and to say otherwise is to confuse things. We are facing a country, which is armed to the teeth with a hellish weapon...

Interviewer: It has lethal weapons.

Ahmad Al-Tayyib: Exactly. We are facing tyranny and oppression, while the world watches from the sidelines. The Palestinians, on the other hand, are defenseless and have nothing, and they want to defend their country, their faith, and their homeland. The only method they have is [martyrdom operations], and employing it is very difficult for them. Is it easy for a Palestinian to bring his life to an end? No, it isn't. He too is a human being, who wants to live. What makes him resort to this method? It is not despair, as is claimed by many people who try to interpret martyrdom operations as suicide operation driven by despair. No. That is not true. The Palestinian martyrdom-seeker knows that he is free to go to this operation, in order to please Allah and enter Paradise, in defense of his religion, his country, and his land.

So, it is forbidden...unless the target is Jews...

Charles is spot on:

Ahmad Al-Tayyib is no radical on the fringes of Islam; he’s president of Sunni Islam’s highest center of learning, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, and the former mufti of Egypt.

And he supports suicide bombings. Under the right conditions, of course. For example, when killing Jews.

Notice the religious basis for condoning this type of terrorism (he even admits it is "terrorism"). Al-Tayyib, like most Islamic clerics who have gone on record supporting suicide attacks, offers a contorted justification that the attackers aren’t really committing suicide at all. Instead, they are "martyrs" who please Allah and are granted entry to "paradise."

Religiously-sanctioned suicide bombing, coming directly from one of the highest academic authorities in the Islamic world, broadcast on Egypt’s Al-Mihwar TV, October 10, 2007.

Yaacov digs into some numbers and thinks that just may be so.

It wouldn't surprise me, since any media market is more likely to be dominated by an entity that shares the "liberal" mindset, said liberals will be less likely to feel compelled to seek out other sources of presentation and interpretation. I know I frequently see stories in the NYT, Boston Globe, or on the networks for which I immediately think, "Hmmm...I wonder what the other spin on this is..." and then go looking.

And what do they have to spend it on except themselves (salaries, cars, condos...guns)?

Reuters: Palestinian Authority to request $5.5 bln in aid

RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - President Mahmoud Abbas's government will ask donors in Paris this month to provide $5.5 billion in aid to strengthen the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority, Palestinian officials said on Sunday.

The aid, to be used for budgetary support and development, is meant to strengthen Abbas against Hamas Islamists and revive the Palestinian economy after the president launched formal peace talks with Israel last week.

Prime Minister Salam Fayyad will ask donors at the Paris conference, scheduled for December 17, to provide $5.5 billion in aid over three years. The request is based on an economic plan for 2007 to 2010, a senior Palestinian official told Reuters...

Our friend Pieter Dorsman is one of the principals behind a new political commentary site: PoliGazette:

The founders of PoliGazette want to encourage debate and discussion without descending into shrill partisan rhetoric which has increasingly become the norm on both the left and right blogosphere. PoliGazette will be a place where moderate liberals, centrists and conservatives feel at home. We want this site to be a place for civilized debate. We want, in short, to offer readers a wide range of opinions and perspectives so that they can make their minds up more easily - or at least more informed. We therefore will not be reluctant to invite bloggers and writers from both sides to participate in PoliGazette by writing and commenting on our site.

Good luck!

Cindy Sheehan will be one of the speakers (along with ex-CIA lefty loon Ray McGovern, Muslim Studies lecturer from University of Wisconson, Kevin Barrett and others) at this year's Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth:

Building on the success of last year’s inaugural event, Boston 9/11 Truth is proud to present two days of 911 truth activism at this year’s Boston Tea Party and Conference for 9/11 Truth, to be held Saturday and Sunday, December 15 and 16, 2007. This year’s theme, “Scientists and Citizens Speak Out,” reinforces our commitment to the broadest exposure possible of the scientific, criminal and political issues being covered-up and/or ignored by our government and the media concerning the events of September 11, 2001...

It'll be a moonbatty weekend. Karin Friedemann, now a Ron Paulian, has been plugging the Ron Paul Boston Tea Party/Freedom Rally on the Islamic Society of Boston list:

On December 16th, 1773, American colonists dumped tea into the Boston Harbor to protest an oppressive tax.

This December 16th 2007, American citizens will gather to express their support for ending the oppressive and unconstitutional inflation tax - which has enabled a flawed foreign policy, a costly war and the sacrificing of our liberties here at home...

I think all these tea parties are more about smoking it than drinking it.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Anyone can do it. It's a matter of how you handle it when the problems are exposed. An NRO milblogger exaggerated a couple of reports. You can't do that, whether you're doing "reporting" or blogging -- and I had linked his stuff, which is annoying.

Ruthie Blum has an excellent interview with al Dura defendant Philippe Karsenty. Not to be missed: One on One: 'Muhammed al-Dura has become a brand-name'. A couple of snips (but every answer is a keeper):

...Why do you think that Israelis are not aware of this?

When you live in a country in which 80 percent of the people are Jewish, you don't know what anti-Semitism is. You are insulated. You do not have pictures of Muhammed al-Dura posted everywhere. Nor do you have the kind of experiences people outside of Israel have. For example, the day after the footage of Muhammed al-Dura was aired, I went to my office - at that time, I had a software company - and one of my employees came up to me and asked in an accusatory tone, "What were you doing in Gaza yesterday?"

I answered, "I wasn't in Gaza yesterday."
He said, "No, I mean your army."

I said, "What? The French army was in Gaza yesterday?"
He said, "No, the Israeli army."...

...Do you think there's a difference between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism?

Oh yes, they are very, very different. Anti-Semites are frank; anti-Zionists are hypocritical. They hate Jews and have found a way to be anti-Semitic without admitting to it.

Karsenty will be in the Boston area this month. I hope there will be a public event.

Miss Kelly has a round-up of coverage on the Care International trial happening right here in Boston: Update on Care International Trial in Boston/ "Seas of Blood for Jihad" Three men, Emadeddin Muntasser, Muhammed Mubayyid, and Samir Al-Monla, are accused of setting up an Islamic "charity" and using the money to support terrorists in Bosnia and Chechnya. I'm sure they did plenty of glad-handing among the ecumenical community before they were exposed...

Uri Orbach has it just right (worth reading in full): Two states for one people

...it turns out that the Palestinians are not really interested in two states for two peoples.

Actually, to be accurate, they are interested in two states, but disagreement prevails regarding the identity and entitlement of the second people. They don’t think the Jewish people deserves its own state. They are generous enough to accept one state that would be designated for Palestinians only, and another state that would be designated for the "Israeli people."

The Israeli people will bring together Jews, Muslims, and members of various other religions; a state and a half for one people, and half a state for the other people.

This is an excellent joke. Simply because there is no such thing as the "Israeli people."...

...This has always been the Palestinian approach: "What’s ours is already ours. What Israel already agreed to: A Palestinian state for the Palestinians – that’s in our pocket already. Yet regarding this annoying and bothersome matter of a state for the Jews – this won’t be happening. Why should it be that way? We want to be partners in Israel too."

And we haven’t yet mentioned the State of Gaza, which is yet another tiny and angry Palestinian state that suddenly appeared, and we shall have to engage in negotiations or a small war with it as well one of these days.

Therefore, here is a practical suggestion for role reversal: In the first phase, Israel would not recognize the Palestinians’ right for a state of their own. Why should they get a state? After all, the Arab nation has enough states. If, ultimately, for the sake of peace we will have to allow the establishment of a state with a Palestinian majority, it won’t be recognized as a Palestinian or Arab state. After all, many Jews and Israelis would still be living there.

First, we shall recognize the Jewish right of return to communities in Gush Katif and across Judea and Samaria, the land of our forefathers. Because this is our land too, nobody will be uprooted from his community, neither Jew nor Arab. We will find the technical solutions needed to manage our life together. Meanwhile, the Jewish State will exist safely in little Israel. Two states for two peoples.

Saeb Erekat really exposed the whole agenda when he said that the Arabs would never recognize Israel as a Jewish State. It puts the lie to any excuses about occupation or other land issues, and Israel makes a mistake in making any further concessions until this simple matter is settled.

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Last night I attended an event that promised to provide some solid intellectual nutrition, and I was not disappointed.

The Tufts Freethought Society sponsored a debate between Tufts resident scholar and leading light in the Brights movement, philosopher Daniel Dennett, and well-known conservative thinker and author of the recent book, What's So Great About Christianity, Dinesh D'Souza. The question of the debate was to have been "God is a manmade invention," with Dennett in the affirmative and D'Souza against, but it quickly degenerated -- Dennett, who began, shifted almost immediately -- to a more general, "Does God exist?" and an even more general examination of religion itself.

dsouza.jpg

I think I've been clear about my own feelings on the question specific and general -- I am fervently agnostic, and certainly closer to the Dennett position than the D'Souza, though I have become more respectful of the sincerely religious in recent years and consider myself wide open to a good argument. (I wrote about some of this in: Thoughts Have Roots and Enlightenment <> Humanity.) I find the "Brights" business insufferable and a complete turn-off though, and frankly don't think many people on either side of the question have spent much time sincerely considering the other's viewpoint in any sort of sincere way, and most peoples' opinions in this matter, as in so many things, are like "images of Daedalus" -- lots of opinion that sounds good to those who agree, but very little real depth of knowledge.

As I say, I'm wide open to a good argument, I've just been waiting for one to come along. I may have come as close as can reasonably be expected last night. D'Souza sparkled, and brought forth more interesting food for the thought buffet than I've had served up in some time.

I was warned by a former student of his that Danel Dennett is not a very impressive speaker and likely wouldn't bring much to the debating table. He was proven correct. Dennett was unimpressive as a speaker, though I was wanting so badly to hear his arguments. He opened the debate with an approximately 25 minute prepared monologue with PowerPoint. So far, so good. He had some interesting things to say, though he exposed some of his own weaknesses as well -- something I'll get to -- but when it came time for rejoinders he fell flat. I have no doubt that D'Souza misused some science in his arguments, but disappointingly, Dennett wasn't quick on his feet enough to present the problems to a live audience in a concise manner -- and he's likely written books about it. In fact, later in the debate, when Dennett made the point that, contrary to what D'Souza said concerning morality being a trait that Evolution couldn't account for, though Dennett couldn't explain it, D'Souza was gracious enough to say he would make a point of getting Dennett's books to read up on the matter, as he was happy to learn.

I think many in the audience must have been disappointed to see in D'Souza someone who was not some sort of raving religious fanatic. D'Souza clearly "believes" in science, and scientific discoveries like Evolution, he merely believes that in many cases, the scientists have stepped outside their purview. This made him all the more effective.

dennett.jpg

One of the main thrusts of Dennett's opening was his idea that there should be a fourth "R" added to the school curriculum -- Religion. Yes, Dennett believes in learning about religions -- their histories, creeds, rituals, music, symbols, ethical commands and prohibitions -- and not just of one or two religions, but of everything from Hinduism to the John Frum Cargo Cult (this learning, says he, should be compulsory for all). He beats around the bush quite a bit, and poses sincerely -- one of the points he says he is making is that "All religions have toxic versions" and that all these toxic versions require enforced ignorance of the young...which he will overcome by straightforwardly overcoming this ignorance. Fair enough. But it quickly becomes clear that Dennett's real intent is that once people learn about all of these things, they'll soon begin to see the absurdity of it all and be liberated from it just like Dan Dennett. After all, they can't all be right, can they? And some are quite silly, are they not? Well, no, since some may be right and some may be wrong.

And here's the weakness of the entire Atheist movement on display. Argument via ridicule only takes you so far, and only keeps the already converted entertained. Time and again I was disappointed not only by Dennett's inability to articulate the science, but in his inability to respond to D'Souza's very interesting thought experiments, analogies and use of example from the history of Philosophy itself. What a disappointment from such a well-trained professor of philosophy!

Dennett can't resist a political comment but winds up undermining his entire argument when he states something along the lines of his being more afraid of some self-righteous neocon in the Pentagon using a nuke than he is Pakistan or Iran. So a bunch of politicos with a secularly-derived set of beliefs can be more dangerous than apocalyptic religious fanatics? This would be interesting to bear in mind as we watched, later in the evening, as Dennett tried dodging that uncomfortable fact that anti-religious people never like to address -- the fact that more murders were committed in the 20 century by atheists in the name of atheism than by all those who ever claimed to fight for their religions.

When the audience was given the chance to participate, the vast majority of the questions were directed toward D'Souza, who handled them all with extreme alacrity.

I should point out that, though I have been tough on Dennett and the Atheists in this, that's not to say they don't have their own good arguments. The thing is, I'm relating my impressions of this debate, and those good arguments just weren't on display last night. We're always hardest on our friends who disappoint us.

Dennett says that humans don't need God to tell them right from wrong -- it's time for humans to grow up and figure it out for themselves. But how do we do this? How do we remember it for the next generation? How do we teach it? How do we propagate it? We evolve religions (aside: Both Dennett and D'Souza agree on this). And that's all Dennett, Dawkins, et. al. are doing. They're upset that so many people hold so many poorly examined beliefs, but really, how many of their own followers have engaged sincere, well-placed argument on behalf of God on its own terms with an open and inquiring spirit? Not many I'd wager. The world is full of people with incompletely examined and challenged beliefs.

Here is the entire debate in 15 YouTubed parts linked at the web site of Richard Dawkins, where the comment thread will confirm every negative stereotype you may or may not hold about the Dawkins brand of atheist.

Here is my own .mp3 suitable for your player:

Update: RichardDawkins.net has updated with a link to the video of the full event in one piece, as well as a better quality .mp3.

Update2: Dinesh D'Souza blogs about the event himself: Is God a Man-Made Invention?

Get yer popcorn popped, folks. This one looks like it's going to be quite a show. I don't know enough about copyright law to know if this thing has any real merit. I sure hope so. The only thing worse than a lame lawsuit is a lame lawsuit that gets tossed. The complaint itself is entertaining enough to read. Jihad Watch has links as well as excerpts: Savage fights back, sues CAIR

In fact, and as set forth more fully herein, CAIR is not a civil rights organization and never has been.

If the suit has real merit, and if Savage sees it all the way through without settling, this has the potential to be very illuminating.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]