Amazon.com Widgets

May 2007 Archives

Thursday, May 31, 2007

A Counter-Boycott

YNet: Research foundation blocks new grants for Britons

UK academic boycott of Israel prompts US-based Goldhirsh foundation to cancel plans to open grant application process for British research institutions. Immigration Minister Ze'ev Boim announces intention to propose counter-boycott

An American research foundation announced on Thursday that following the decision of the British University and College Union (UCU) to consider launching an academic boycott of Israel it has cancelled its plans to open a grant application process for UK researchers.

The $150 million Goldhirsh foundation supports scientists around the world in the quest for a cure for brain cancer funds research.

In a letter to British academic institutions, foundation leader Elizabeth Goldhirsh writes: " As a director of a $150 million foundation that supports scientists around the world in the quest for a cure for brain cancer, I am profoundly disappointed in your union's decision to boycott Israel today.

"This action represents a severe setback for academic freedom and open discourse. Moreover, the decision to single out and demonize Israel above and beyond all other countries - remaining silent over Russia's brutal occupation in Chechnya, for example, or China's ongoing oppression of Tibet - is, at best, troubling. At worst, it points to a far more sinister and tragic motivation.

"Equally disturbing is to do so at a time when Israel's civilians are facing near-daily missile attacks from Gaza and her partner for negotiations is an organization that dispatches suicide bombers and refuses to recognize the Jewish State's right to exist.

"Given this decision, I am deeply saddened to say that while my foundation had been considering opening up our scientific grant process to British researchers we will no longer be able to do so. I urge you to work against this boycott and restore learning's highest ideal of fairness free of prejudice to British academia."

'Freezing Jewish donations to UK institutions'

Meanwhile Immigrant Absorption Minister Ze'ev Boim has suggested that Jewish donors supporting academic institutions in the United Kingdom freeze their donations following the boycott proposal...

Thompson and Hunter

Go Fred Thomson: Living in Terror

Let me ask you a hypothetical question. What do you think America would do if Canadian soldiers were firing dozens of missiles every day into Buffalo, N.Y.? What do you think our response would be if Mexican troops for two years had launched daily rocket attacks on San Diego -- and bragged about it?

I can tell you, our response would look nothing like Israel's restrained and pinpoint reactions to daily missile attacks from Gaza. We would use whatever means necessary to win the war. There would likely be numerous casualties on our enemy's side, but we would rightfully hold those who attacked us responsible...

...The Palestinian strategy is to purposely target and kill Israeli civilians. Then, when Israel goes after those launching the attacks, Palestinians claim to be the victims. If Palestinian civilians aren't hurt in the Israeli attacks, they stage injuries and deaths. Too often, they garner sympathy and support from a gullible or anti-Semitic media in the international community.

Israelis, themselves, are often incapable of facing the damage they inflict in self-defense. Knowing this, Islamic extremists are using their own populations as human shields...

And big ups to Duncan Hunter for doing a guest post at LGF:

...I strongly support the wall that the Israelis have built, which has greatly reduced terrorist attacks — and believe that it’s very important for the United States to help Israel improve its missile defense in order to prevent the sort of attacks that country suffered during its war with Hezbollah last year. Incidentally, I’ve been encouraging Israel to build up her missile defense since back in 1987 as well as supporting the funding of joint missile defense technology programs such as the Arrow program.

Additionally, while the United States should do what it can to resolve the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians, it’s simply not possible for the Israelis to make peace with people who refuse to recognize their existence, kidnap their soldiers, and blow themselves up in crowds of Israeli civilians. So, until the Palestinians renounce terrorism and stop their attacks on the Israeli people, peace will be out of reach. Let me also add that I’ve been to Israel, have seen the importance of regions like the Golan Heights to their security, and believe that Israel should not be asked to give up any more land in order to make peace with the Palestinians...


Boycotts: Who's Responsible

Judy urges avoiding hysteria: Boycott hysteria is no way to deal with empty gesture politics.

The trouble is that there are too many of these things in too many fields, whether it's boycotts or horrid bias in the media. The silent majority of moderates is complicit by their lack of action. I don't know what else to say about that. It's beyond the point now, to me, of saying that MOST people (in whatever profession) don't agree with this stuff, or won't follow the lead...it's beyond that.

Netanyahu:


MAS Watch: Take the Bus to the "Anti-Occupation" Rally!

Ah, our new friends and partners for interfaith dialog and cooperation, good-feelings and love, who simply want a base for worship -- the Muslim American Society/Islamic Society of Boston -- have an invitation posted on their moderated email list to the June 10th Anti-Occupation mega-rally in Washington DC. Perhaps some of our advocates for the ISB will hop on the bus with them:

The BCPR bus to Washington DC for the June 10 rally will leave at midnight, Sunday morning, June 10. The round trip fare is $55. Full payment and passenger count are due the bus compnay on Friday, June 1. Please RSVP asap to Sherif Fam at: sherif2@comcast.net. Thank you, Sherif (617) 491-xxxx home (703) 622-xxxx mobile

---

WHEN: Thursday, June 7 from 4:30 PM to 6 PM
WHERE: In front of Au Bon Pain and the Holyoke Center in Harvard Square
WHY: It is Harvard’s graduation and the Square will be full of people.

We will be holding banners and distributing flyers publicizing the June 10th Washington DC rally protesting the 40th anniversary of Israel’s Occupation.

Please plan to join us! If your group would like to co-sponsor this event, email numurray@comcast.net.

Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights

---

Join the Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights (BCPR) for a National March in Washington DC on Sunday, June 10th, 2007...

There's so much more, with a speaker's list including such luminaries as Huwaida Arraf, Mahdi Bray, Leslie Cagan, Ronnie Kasrils, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Afif Safieh and Noura Erakat...

You can sing rounds of "99 bottles of Mecca Cola on the wall" on the way down.

And Another British Anti-Israel Boycott

U.K. public services union to consider boycott of Israel

BRITAIN - The United Kingdom's public services union UNISON will consider a proposal for imposing a boycott on Israel during its annual conference in mid-June, in the wake of Wednesday's decision by a British lecturers union to back a boycott of Israeli academic institutions.

UNISON representatives who are in contact with the Histadrut labor federation have in recent days presented the Histadrut's international activities director, Avital Shapira, with a copy of the proposal.

According to the proposal, UNISON, which has some 1.4 million members, will urge other British unions to follow its lead and cut off all economic and cultural ties with Israel.

Histadrut sources said the impression they have received is that UNISON will vote in favor of the boycott. The conference will be held June 19-22 in Brighton.

If approved, the boycott would have a significant practical, and not just symbolic, impact, given that the union enjoys large economic influence in Britain.

According to Histadrut Chairman Ofer Eini, "this is a dangerous decision, because it could harm numerous workers in Israel and their employers, specifically in organizations that have commercial ties to Britain."...

[h/t: Bald-Headed Geek]

Finland's Leading Paper Compares Jewish Parliamentarian to Shylock The Jew

Oh those sophisticated Europeans. They quote Shakespeare when they call you a kike.

Tundra Tabloids reports: Finland's Leading Paper Compares Jewish Parliamentarian to Shylock The Jew...

rossi.jpg

Now Appearing: Matti Rossi as Antonio

Another Finnish newspaper publishes an article that degrades a Jewish parliamentarian.

The Helsingin Sanomat's [the New York Times of Finland] cultural editor, Hannu Marttila published Matti Rossi's [pictured] oily/smarmy "tongue in cheek" response to Finnish parliamentarian Ben Zyskowicz's outrage over Rossi being awarded a cash prize by the Finnish government for his life time work in translating Shakespeare's classics into Finnish. [The state prize for literature carries with it not only the honor of the award itself, but also 15 000 Euros.]

The reason for Zyskowicz's outrage over the Finnish state's awarding of Matti Rossi with the prize, was for Rossi's role as a snitch for the Hungarian communist government back in 75'...

...This time I won't bother translating the full text, but in a tongue in cheek op-ed, he [Rossi] likens Zyskowicz to the Shakespearean character Shylock the Jew. Ben Zyskowicz happens to be Jewish himself, making the comparison undeniable.

Kirjailija William Shakespeare kuvaa dramaattisesti vastaavaa yritystä Venetsiassa 1500-luvun lopulla. / The writer William Shakespeare dramatically pictured a comparable attempt in Venice in the late 1500's. "

In the short op-ed, Matti Rossi was clearly making fun of Ben Zyskowicz, and characterizing him in a way that mirrored the story of the merchant of Venice, a Shakespearean play. It was totally irresponsible for the paper to print it, and as I said before about other examples of anti-Semitism in the Finnish media, it's becoming kind of trend here...

See Tundra Tabloids for embedded links and more.

Another 'Divestment Professor' Takes Over at Columbia

In place of the departed (resigned, not dead) Lisa Anderson, John H. Coatsworth will be taking over as Dean of Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA). Who's John H. Coatsworth? Jerry Gordon has the disturbing answers.

AFSC's 'Peacemakers'

An emailer sends in a link to the American Friends Service Committee's page: Profiles of Peace. It is...entertaining in a perverse sort of way:

June 2007 marks the 40th anniversary of the Israeli military occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. At AFSC, we’re taking this time to reflect on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and to appreciate Palestinians and Israelis who have worked for peace and justice.

During May and June, AFSC presents Faces of Hope – Profiles of Peace. Profiles of Peace includes 40 short biographies of Israeli and Palestinian peace builders. A new profile will be added each weekday beginning May 1 and continuing through June 8. Follow the name links on this page to read each profile.

Also, please mark your calendars on June 10 and 11, 2007 for the rally, teach-in, and lobby day in Washington, DC, The World Says No to Israeli Occupation.

My my my, it certainly is interesting to see who AFSC thinks are "peacemakers." Let's have a look around. Today's peacemaker is Isam Sartawi:

Palestinian physician who founded the Red Crescent Medical Society and the Active Organization for the Liberation of Palestine (AOLP), a non-combatant group that offered medical assistance to Palestinian resistance fighters...In 1968, his group merged with Fatah, the main PLO armed resistance group, but later split with them, only to rejoin them in 1971 after the Black September events...

Here are some other names:

Ali Abunimah - Innovated use of the internet to destroy the state.
Huwaida Arraf - Co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement.
Naim Ateek - Founder of Sabeel, uses deicide imagery to criticize Jews.
Azmi Bishara - Former Israeli Parliamentarian, current traitor, on the run for giving Hizballah information during the war.
Edward Said - Thought Arafat too moderate.

There are many more.

Silent Slogans at Boston's Jerusalem Day Celebration: Protester Pics Inside

Another Israel event, another protest. This one was, according to the Solomonia operative present, characteristically small, but uncharacteristically quiet.

The Israeli Consulate sponsored its annual Jerusalem Day Celebration at the Boston Public Library yesterday. This is the same event at which Green-Rainbow Party activist David Rolde and his compadre Peter Lowney were arrested last year. The usual call went out for sloganeers, but things were quiet this time...maybe, too quiet... According to someone who was there:

Well, the whole SDP [Somerville Divestment Project] contingent was transplanted into Copley today. there was about 10 of them, all familiar faces. They all looked quite awful (that signature homeless look) and they seemed to scare passersby more than anything...They were absolutely quiet, not a peep [perhaps they learned this from their ACLU friends -S]. They were to the side of the entrance, not really interfering with folks going inside. Inside, someone asked me what was going on tonight at the lib as so many people were inside.

There was one counter-protester with a small sign made right there...

Well, there's not a big story to tell here, but everyone enjoys some protester pics, so here they are:

Continue reading "Silent Slogans at Boston's Jerusalem Day Celebration: Protester Pics Inside"

Speaking of MPAC and Steven Emerson...

...never mess with a man who saves everything. He is the Archivist.

Following Emerson's TV exchange with MPAC's Edina Lekovic in which Emerson dredged up some embarrassing connections from Lekovic's supposedly "moderate" past, Lekovic had the nerve to send Emerson a condescending email demanding a retraction.

Hilarity ensues: Ms. Lekovic...A Dozen Printing Mistakes?.

Too much to excerpt, just check out the post.

Note to Edina Lekovic: Don't lie about things that are in writing.

Islamic Society of Boston: Press Conference and Emerson's Press Release

Steven Emerson's Investigative Project (Emerson was one of the defendants in the suit) has a press release worth noting: Islamic Society of Boston Dismisses Lawsuit Against Steven Emerson

BOSTON, May 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following release was issued today by the Investigative Project on Terrorism:

Earlier today, the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) dismissed its baseless defamation lawsuit against world-renowned terrorism expert, Steven Emerson, his organization -- The Investigative Project on Terrorism, and various individuals, organizations and media outlets in the Boston area. No money will change hands; Mr. Emerson will not apologize and stands behind everything he said about ISB's associations with Islamic extremists; nor is he limited in anything he may say in the future. Today's events represent a strong, stirring victory for free speech and American values and a repudiation of the tactic of misusing the judicial system to seek to stifle important and legitimate forms of expression.

The lawsuit, initiated by the ISB in October 2005, was a clear attempt to intimidate journalists, researchers and private citizens from engaging in constitutionally protected activities, including informing the public of extremist elements in their midst. Although Mr. Emerson has been fully vindicated and will continue vigorously to unmask radical Islamist organizations and networks in the U.S. and around the world, the ISB's groundless lawsuit has demonstrated that the judicial system can be too easily misused by those seeking to intimidate and harass those who have justly criticized them. Fortunately, today's result demonstrates that those with the truth on their side should never be intimidated or cowed into silence.

Contact: Floyd Abrams of Cahill, Gordon, Reindel - Phone xxx xxx xxxx Or the Investigative Project on Terrorism - Email: stopterror@aol.com

The Globe has a frivolous article on the MAS/ISB press conference yesterday: Muslim, Jewish leaders see fresh start. I guess the Globe isn't half as silly as the Jewish "leaders" quoted, though. Leaders who will overlook anything to deny the reality of what's growing in their midst. And oh look, it's Mahdi Bray! I wonder if any of the reporters noted of Bray...

...when Abdurrahman Alamoudi of the American Muslim Council [and founder of the Islamic Society of Boston -S], who is now serving a 23-year prison sentence for a terrorism financing conviction, encouraged the Muslim crowd at an October 2000 rally cosponsored by MPAC to declare their support of the jihad terror groups Hamas and Hizballah, “MPAC’s Political Advisor, Mahdi Bray, stood directly behind Alamoudi and was seen jubilantly exclaiming his support for these two deadly terrorist organizations.” This was just three weeks after Bray “coordinated and led a rally where approximately 2,000 people congregated in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C.” Emerson reports that “at one point during the rally, Mahdi Bray played the tambourine as one of the speakers sang, while the crowd repeated: ‘Al-Aqsa [Mosque] is calling us, let’s all go into jihad, and throw stones at the face of the Jews [sic].’”...

...and asked him if he'll be playing his tambourine inside this mosque...?

Hiding Behind Skirts

capt.jrl12805221700.mideast_israel_palestinians__jrl128.jpg

Two rocket are launched from Gaza City Tuesday, May 22, 2007. Seven rockets were fired towards Israel on Tuesday, lightly wounding two people, the army said. Israel responded with four airstrikes, targeting two suspected arms caches and two Hamas bases. Palestinian officials said seven people were wounded.(AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti)

Makes it a little difficult to hit them without harming civilians, doesn't it?

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Threats? Proof please.

On Monday, I linked to an email exchange between Phil Orenstein and Barnard President Judith Shapiro concerning the tenure bid of Barnard Wakademic, Nadia Abu El-Haj.

There was a sentence in one of Shapiro's responses that I sort of glossed over when I read it, but others took notice of:

To clarify and provide some additional information: I do not myself believe that the people who are getting in touch with me anonymously truly need to do so. Nadia Abu El-Haj has also received death threats from those opposed to her work.

I glossed over it when I read for a few reasons: Claims of receiving "death threats" are a dime a dozen on the internet. Sometimes people misinterpret things or express themselves in an ill-advised way that someone looking to make themselves look like a sympathetic victim can intentionally blow out of proportion.

I also wouldn't be surprised if some fool said or wrote something they thought was "helpful" but was actually stupid and despicable. It's a big world with a lot of fools in it. Such threats, if real and beyond the type of thing one gets in the typical internet "nastygram", are never justified in a free society.

If El-Haj actually received a threat, I'd like to know if she reported it to law enforcement. If not, I doubt even she thinks it's credible. A call can be traced, an email can be forwarded with full headers and likewise usually be traced.

At Campus Watch, Winfield Myers "calls out" El Haj, noting other instances of academics who claimed threats that ended up amounting to nothing anyone could ever pin down: Judith Shapiro Claims Nadia Abu El Haj Has Received a Death Threat; Will She Produce Evidence?

...Nadia Abu El-Haj has also received death threats from those opposed to her work.

Two questions leap to mind:

* Can Shapiro (or Nadia Abu El Haj) produce evidence to back up this claim?

* Was the threat reported to a law enforcement agency?

There is no excuse for threatening scholars, and I sincerely hope that anyone who does so is arrested and prosecuted. Vigorous debate is the lifeblood of intellectual life, and only intellectual cowards resort to threats. If El Haj received such threats, no legitimate critic of hers will wish for anything other than seeing the person or persons who made the threats swiftly brought to justice...

We'll see if he gets a response.

Major British College Union Endorses Boycott Motion (Update)

Developing: Boycott motion passes at UCU conference

UCU conference just passed a motion to support the campaign for an academic boycott of Israel. 158 for, 99 against, 17 abstentions. More soon.

The motions passed are as follows:

30. Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions

Congress notes that Israel's 40-year occupation has seriously damaged the fabric of Palestinian society through annexation, illegal settlement, collective punishment and restriction of movement...[etc]

Congress believes that in these circumstances passivity or neutrality is unacceptable and criticism of Israel cannot be construed as anti-semitic [Glad that's settled -S].

Congress instructs the NEC to
* circulate the full text of the Palestinian boycott call to all branches/Las for information and discussion;
* encourage members to consider the moral implications of existing and proposed links with Israeli academic institutions;
* organise a UK wide campus tour for Palestinian academic/educational trade unionists;
* issue guidance to members on appropriate forms of action
* actively encourage and support branches to create direct links with Palestinian educational institutions and to help set up nationally sponsored programmes for teacher exchanges, sabbatical placements, and research

31. European Union and Israel

1. That since the Palestinian elections in January 2006 the Israeli government has suspended revenue payments to the Palestinian Authority, and the EU and US have suspended aid, leaving public sector salaries unpaid and earning the condemnation of the Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions

2. That Israel is seeking to upgrade its relations with the EU to the same level as Norway and Switzerland, permitting free passage of goods, people and capital, while denying these freedoms to Palestinians.

3. a moratorium on research and cultural collaborations with Israel via EU and European Science Foundation funding until Israel abides by UN resolutions

Congress resolves to campaign for:
* the restoration of all international aid to the PA and al revenues rightfully belonging to it;
* No upgrade of Israel's EU status until it ends the occupation of Palestinian land and fully complies with EU Human Rights law.

Congress instructs the NEC to encourage Branches/associations to

1. raise these campaigns in their Institutions
2. investigate the possibilities of twinning their Institution with a Palestinian University or College.

Engage also notes that what's passed is less a demand to boycott than a demand to...go out on the stump for a boycott. A final boycott apparently requires a vote of the full union, not just the Congress.

This is all quite confusing, but as near as I can figure what they've done is create the hostile environment de facto, while avoiding legal issues by not demanding a boycott de jure.

Judy at Adloyada was writing the "program" to the thing (can't tell the players without a program) here: Another UK academic boycott is a near certainty, and here: UCU union movers for and against the Israeli academic boycott.

More confusinger, Engage notes this motion, also passed and says it makes actually boycotting impossible: UCU passed the old AUT policy on greylisting and boycotts which makes a boycott of Israel impossible. Well, it's the thought that counts, ain't it?

UCU itself seems to be trying to mitigate:

...Responding to the votes this afternoon, UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, said: 'As I have made clear in the past, and as I reiterated on the floor of congress this morning, I do not believe a boycott is supported by the majority of UCU members, nor do I believe that members see it is a priority for the union.

'Today's motion on boycott means all branches now have a responsibility to consulate all of their members on the issue and I believe that every member should have the opportunity to have their say. The earlier motion means that any future calls for a boycott must pass key tests before a boycott can implemented.'

You passed it, you own it. There are sufficient busybodies actually running things giving the rest a bad name. Imagine, a tiny monitory of extremists just happen to have all the power. I don't believe the minority is that tiny, however.

Update: Judy has a post of analysis that pretty well confirms my negative take on it (Though it's all still confusing. These fools have got themselves so tied up in political knots it's a wonder they ever do any educating or research): UK academic boycott of Israel: UCU GenSec & Engage anti-boycott group seriously misleading about chances of stopping it

Sabra and Shatilla: Double Standards Anyone?

Hillel Stavis writes in:

Among the rogue’s gallery of names familiar to the world when it comes to the Arab Israeli conflict none rings with more guilt and shame than Sabra and Shatilla, the two Palestinian refugee camps that were the scenes of massacre in 1982. The only name the world associates with that tragedy is Ariel Sharon, then Israel’s Defense Minister who resigned after the Kahan Commission found him indirectly responsible for not anticipating the attack by Christian Phalangists.

Not so well known is the name Elie Hobeika, the Lebanese commander in charge of the forces that killed those hundreds of civilians in Sabra and Shatilla. Nor are the months of May, 1985 or February 1987 standard commemorative dates for those that purport to defend Palestinian rights. Those dates mark successive massacres of Palestinians inside the same and other Lebanese refugee camps committed by various Arab sectarian armies. Thanks to the indefatigable work of the anti-Israel lobby, the mainstream media and ideologues like Alexander Cockburn, Norman Finkelstein, Anthony Lewis, and Noam Chomsky, those events remain virtually unknown to the world. Why unknown? Simply because the Jews of Israel cannot be easily linked to the atrocities.

Incidentally, the perpetrator of most of those massacres, Mr. Hobeika, went on to become, absurdly, Lebanon’s Minister for Social Affairs and the Handicapped in 1992.

It would seem that the long-standing practice of exculpating Arab murderers of other Arabs is as staunch as ever with the recent fighting in Lebanon between that country’s army and Fatah al Islam, Al Quaeda allies who have allegedly hijacked the Nahr al Bared Palestinian refugee camp on the outskirts of Tripoli. Reportedly, the remaining residents of the camp, like those in 1987 have resorted to cannibalism to stay alive. Why the residents of Nahr al Bared never reported their “hijacking “ to Lebanese authorities when they “took over” the camp a year ago is never plumbed by reporters or pundits.

Instead, the deplorable events of the past month have been reported as if some natural disaster has befallen the residents of the camp. No emotional expressions of blame surround the onslaught by the Lebanese army, nor have any “peace groups” like the International Solidarity Movement or Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch assigned blame to the attacking forces that have killed dozens of civilians, wounded hundreds and made thousands more homeless. Unlike their carefully crafted omission of Hezbollah militants using Lebanese civilians as human shields during last summer’s war, Joe Stork of Human Rights Watch declared recently that “Fatah al-Islam militants must not hide among civilians, and the Lebanese army must take better precautions to prevent needless civilian deaths.”

A more tepid response to the crisis can hardly be imagined. HRW Director, Kenneth Roth, went to extraordinary and dubious lengths to indict Israel for “indiscriminate bombing” in spite of the photographic evidence of Hezbollah launching rockets from within civilian neighborhoods.
On May 21st of this year, The Boston Globe headlined its story about the battle inside Nahr al Bared:

“Lebanese Soldiers Battle Militants”

A similarly tepid headline, indeed. In 1982, there were hundreds of “militants” within Sabra and Shatilla as well. Can anyone envision a headline back then that might have read:

“Israeli Christian Allies Battle Militants”

Of course not.

It’s as if today’s civilian deaths represent a local squabble unworthy of a “progressive’s” outrage. Needless to say, had a Jew or an Israeli been involved, there would be marches down the main streets of Berkeley, Cambridge, Ann Arbor and Madison on a daily basis. “Teach-ins” would have been convened on hundreds of American campuses, European unions (as if they needed encouragement) would have accelerated their boycotts of Israeli academics and goods and the World Court would have been hastily convened to indict the errant Jews. Countless psychiatrists and counselors would be appearing on NPR and the BBC analyzing the effects of the Lebanese army’s actions on the already battered psyches of Palestinian children.

Meanwhile the killings in the Arab and Muslim world continue and grow with the inevitable involvement of the west at that world’s “bloody borders” as Samuel Huntington presciently put it a decade ago.

And underlying the tragedy in Lebanon are the begging questions: Why are there Palestinian refugee camps in the first place in a country that is often touted as a fledgling democracy? Why are the Palestinians the only refugee population in the world with a UN agency assigned to their designed and permanent refugee condition? Why, in the exchange of populations following the 1948 war of extermination waged by the Arab states against their neighbor when over 800,000 Jews were forced to flee Arab lands and 500,000 Arabs mostly fled Palestine in anticipation of victory, did one state welcome and absorb those refugees while Arab states made the calculated decision to keep their refugees in poverty and permanent misery?

Lebanon does deserve our tears and pity. But finding a solution to its tragedy will not be found by ignoring endemic Arab violence in the hopes of eventually finding a Jewish villain.

Here's some more irony for you: Hobeika's chief deputy was a guy named Pierre Rizk. Rizk, a man complicit in the massacres at Sabra and Shatilla, went on to become the business manager with power of attorney to Suha Arafat, making millions managing the Arafat money, and perhaps enjoying a little "extracurricular" activity in the bed of the "Ra'is" when the old buggerer was away.

Jonathan Kay has another must-read on the international hypocrisy of the Lebanon situation in Canada's National Post: Jenin comes to Lebanon. So where is the outcry?

In an object lesson in how evil regimes do NOT stabilize their region, they DEstabilize it, see: Jihadists moving into Lebanon from Syria

NAHR EL-BARED, Lebanon -- Heavily armed foreign jihadists have been entering Lebanon from Syria from around the time Western authorities noticed a drop in the infiltration of foreign fighters from Syria to Iraq, Lebanese officials say.

Syrian authorities, hoping to disrupt Lebanon so they can reassert control of the country, "have stopped sending [the jihadists] to Iraq and are now sending them here," charged Mohammed Salam, a specialist in Palestinian affairs in Lebanon. "They sent those people to die in Lebanon."...


More ISB lawsuit reaction

Miss Kelly ably fisks the MAS's press release here: MAS Claims "Victory" in ISB Lawsuit/ Mahdi Bray's Wife is Morgan Fairchild

The Boston Herald reports on itself, here: Islamic group drops Herald suit. Hopefully this will open a new chapter in the press continuing to cover the shady side of the Mosque. Are you listening Howie Carr? I'm talking to you.

The AP has a milquetoast report that seems to start from the MAS press release: Both sides drop legal challenges in mosque suit.

Let's be clear, there is no "both sides" here. The ISB/MAS dropped their suit...period. They were being bled to death by disclosures. In a more perfect world they'd be paying the defendants' expenses. Though the MAS press release and many of the public pronouncements of the ISB and their chosen mouth-pieces have and had been taking on an increasingly strident and desperate "the mosque and Islam are under attack" tone, [I remember Naser Khader of the Danish Democratic Muslims movement remarking that he recommends a Cartoon Crisis for the USA -- you will discover who are democracy-minded Muslims and who are not. This sort of rhetoric is exactly how that thing got started.] the fact is that the mosque itself has never been under serious threat. The only people under "threat" were the leaders of this project -- connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia, raving anti-semites...the self-inflicted wounds of the lawsuit not only showed the defendants' concerns were justified, they were proving them out.

You better believe this result is not what the ISB & Co. had in mind when they began this suit.

Update: The Boston Globe's story is here: Islamic Society drops lawsuit

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Breaking: Islamic Society of Boston Drops Lawsuit! Updated with MAS Release

The Silencing ends!

This press release just in from The David Project:

Islamic Society of Boston Drops Lawsuits Against David Project, Concerned Citizens, Boston Herald and Fox, Abandoning All Of Its Claims Without Receiving Any Payment

David Project to Continue Public Records Lawsuit To Force Disclosure of Evidence on Boston Redevelopment Authority-Islamic Society Land Deal

The David Project has announced that the Islamic Society of Boston ("ISB") and its officers have withdrawn all of their claims against all of the citizens who raised concerns about the ISB, its funding and its leadership, as well as all of their claims against the Boston Herald, Fox-TV and the various journalists whose investigative pieces about the ISB in 2003 and 2004 disclosed damaging information about the ISB and its controversial land deal with the Boston Redevelopment Authority ("BRA"). The ISB and its officers have abandoned all of their claims against all of the defendants they sued 2 years ago, without payment to the ISB or to them of any money whatsoever.

The ISB's decision to drop all of its claims against all of the 17 defendants it sued back in 2005 alleging "defamation" and accusing them of conspiring to violate its civil rights comes just months after the defendants--who included a Muslim cleric, a Christian political science professor and the Jewish daughter of Holocaust survivors, as well as Boston civic leader William Sapers and national terrorism expert Steven Emerson--had begun through their lawyers to conduct discovery into the ISB's financial records, its receipt of millions of dollars in funding from Saudi Arabian and other Middle Eastern sources, its contributions to certain organizations and the records of certain of its officers and directors. The ISB's abandonment of its lawsuits comes only weeks after two of its original Middle Eastern Trustees, Walid Fitaihi of Saudi Arabia and Ali Tobah of Egypt, suddenly resigned as Trustees just before they were required to submit themselves to the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts court hearing the case.

The David Project, whose public records litigation against the BRA forced the public disclosure of evidence regarding the below-fair-market land deal between the BRA and the ISB and the role played in that deal of BRA Deputy Director Muhammed Ali Salaam, will proceed exactly as before with its litigation, seeking the remainder of the documents presently withheld by the BRA. That litigation, The David Project v. Boston Redevelopment Authority, is on file in Suffolk Superior Court in Boston.

"We were determined from the beginning to act the way citizens should, by asking questions about this matter and by refusing to be intimidated into staying silent," said David Project founder and President Charles Jacobs, "and we intend to continue as we have before. Indeed, the evidence that has emerged about the transaction, about the BRA's failure to do due diligence into those whom it chose to subsidize and about the funding and the leadership of the organization that received this public subsidy is of extremely deep concern. That evidence not only vindicates the reporting of the courageous journalists whose investigative work broke the story back in 2003 and 2004, but validates many times over the concerns expressed by the good and decent citizens—Muslims, Christians and Jews- who refused to stay silent."

"Those citizens were vilified by the ISB for having had the courage to speak out", said Jacobs. "The ISB's abandonment of its claims without payment of one dollar to them, coming as it does as the ISB was ordered to turn over evidence, speaks more eloquently than anything else could about the truth of what these citizens said, about the validity of their concerns, and about the lack of merit to the ISB’s allegations that they had been ‘defamed’ and had been financially ‘damaged’. Above all, the ISB’s ultimate abandonment of its lawsuits speaks eloquently about the importance of refusing to be bullied and intimidated into silence."

"This has never been about the right of all people to worship, and to construct houses of worship, which is an important right possessed equally by all people, warranting great respect,” said Jacobs. “What it has been about is specific evidence about specific leaders of a specific organization, and about evidence regarding the funding of that organization and those whom it, in turn, was funding. The threat of Islamic extremism in the United States and elsewhere is a real one. Many of the most courageous and forceful individuals speaking out about this threat are themselves Muslims, and they deserve the support of all of us. The victory we have achieved in this case is a victory for many, but perhaps especially for them, as it bolsters and encourages them, and sends a message on their behalf that intimidation will not work."

Congratulations to all the defendants in the case. It seems clear that the growing number of disclosures were amounting a pile of evidence all pointing to the fact that the plaintiffs never had a case.

Expect things to take a turn with the ISB even more self-cast in the role of the victim. More news as we have it...

Update: The Muslim Brotherhood American Society has issued its "declare victory and depart the field" press release:

Continue reading "Breaking: Islamic Society of Boston Drops Lawsuit! Updated with MAS Release"

40 Years On

Melanie Phillips (I like these kinds of after action reports): The legacy of the Six-Day War

...There were two other notable contributions to the seminar. Martin Kramer considered the common argument that the 1967 war and subsequent ‘occupation’ led to the emergence of Islamist extremism and al Qaeda. The facts, he said, did not fit this thesis. For a start, the one country in the Middle East where Islamism had seized power since 1967 was Iran, which had played no part in that war. 1979, the year the ayatollahs came to power, was the landmark year for the emergence of Islamism; and the historical grievance behind that Iranian revolution was the return of the Shah. Israel was irrelevant. This meant that the key to countering Islamist fundamentalism was not the Israel/Arab peace process, but ‘rolling back the Iranian revolution’ – in other words, regime change in Iran.

In the most poignant and indeed tragic analysis of all, Yossi Klein Halevi suggested that the Six-Day War had brought to light a continuing ambivalence in the attitude to power of the Jewish people themselves. The weeks before that war, when attacks upon Israel and the threat of war were mounting – the ‘waiting period’—reawakened the primal Jewish fear both of a second holocaust and that the Jews would once again be isolated as the world stood by and watched it happen. The principle established by the Six Day War would trigger pre-emptive action by Israel. The consequence of its victory, however, was that Jews felt able for the first time to confront the Holocaust and from that date it became central to the identity of Jews in the diaspora. The other side of the coin was that the same victory enabled the non-Jewish world to slough off its own responsibility for the Holocaust and in turn for the survival of the Jewish people. While Jews saw the Six Day War as a narrow escape from genocide, the non-Jewish world only saw the Jews victorious over another people...

[h/t: AndrewAdam (oops) Holland]

Daniel Pipes relates a wrinkle in the growing consensus among historians concerning the Soviet Union's pivotal roll in instigating the war -- in this case namely that the USSR hoped to knock out Israel's nascent nuclear aspirations: The Soviets' Six-Day War

...Enter Isabella Ginor and Gideon Remez, a wife-husband team, to challenge the accident theory and offer a plausible explanation for the causes of the war. As suggested by the title of their book, Foxbats over Dimona: The Soviets' Nuclear Gamble in the Six-Day War (Yale University Press), they argue that it originated in a scheme by the Soviet Politburo to eliminate Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona, and with it the country's aspiration to develop nuclear weapons...

Sounds a bit "pat," but who knows?

An Italian Pro-Israel Best Seller?

Richard Landes comments on a fascinating interview with former Italian radical Leftist author Fiamma Nirenstein regarding her new book, Israele Siamo Noi [Israel Is Us]: Israele Siamo Noi: Italy’s New Bestseller?.

...“Israel is a country of heroes,” Nirenstein says in Italian-accented English, now turning her undivided attention to our hour-long interview. “My book tries to destroy the vile myths perpetrated about its being ‘colonialist’ or an ‘apartheid state’ on the one hand, and about terrorists ‘being militiamen fighting for freedom’ on the other.”

Nirenstein does this, she explains, by dissecting what she calls the “sick words” that have infiltrated the language and consciousness of an increasingly anti-Semitic Europe - terms she and a group of Italian academics plan on collecting for a glossary, “because such word abuse prevents even the possibility of understanding what Israel is all about.”

She comes by her passion for Israel - and familiarity with the conceptual distortions characteristic of “autocratic ideologies” - honestly. The daughter of Holocaust historian and long-time Al Hamishmar correspondent Aharon “Nir” Nirenstein (who came to Palestine in 1936 from Poland, and went to Italy in 1945 with the Jewish Brigade) and Corriere della Sera journalist Wanda Lattes, Nirenstein was an ardent communist in her youth. And, just as Zionism was part and parcel of her upbringing, so too, she says, was she caught up in the “mental corruption” that caused her generation to look to the likes of Che Guevara for inspiration, while attributing the world’s ills to “capitalist imperialism.”...

Lots of other new posts there as well.

Amnesty International -- the Franchise

A meditation at Breath of the Beast: Amnesty International and the Self-Serving Avarice of the Left

...Amnesty has been an enormously powerful force on the international scene and although its own bias and arrogance has begun to eat away at that power, it is still the most recognizable franchise name in The Human Rights Business. This power is part of what drives people like Vidan mad.

I am referring to frankly leftist activists who populate such groups and their liberal enablers who fall for their marketing campaigns. The very core of their belief system is fear and disdain for those who wield power in the real world. Their entire identity is that they are the champions of the “under-classes”...


Monday, May 28, 2007

Thank You

ACLU Official Led Dismantle-Israel Protest at Gillette Family Event

Remember that enormously successful New England Celebrates Israel event at Gillette Stadium last week? Remember the group of numb-nuts who plotted literally for months for about a minute of standing around with banners they smuggled in under their skirts? (I kid you not -- see that second post for links.) Well an emailer points out that the YouTube video shows that the ACLU's Nancy Murray, of the Massachusetts chapter's "Bill of Rights Education Project," was there, and it appears quite clear that she operated not just as an observer, but as one of the organizers and coaches as well:

nancymurray.jpg

It's either Murray or her also-evil twin.

It should be noted that this was not a case of people wanting their free-speech on public land, a la Nazis at Skokie, this was an event on private property they knew they had to plot to get into, where they knew they had no legal "right" to demand to be, where they could be kept out and removed instantly...this was NOT a Civil Liberties issue, and the ACLU was helping to run the show, not just standing by as dispassionate upholders of the Constitution.

Is Sarkozy the Key to Cutting Off Hizballah?

Yes, according to Matthew Levitt & Michael Jacobson at The New Republic (actually, a lot more good could be done in the world if France were more often on the side of the good guys): How Nicolas Sarkozy could destroy Hezbollah

...Sarkozy appears to see Hezbollah in a different light than his predecessor, Jacques Chirac. In a September 2006 closed-door session with Jewish leaders in the United States, for example, Sarkozy reportedly referred to Hezbollah as a "terrorist organization"--a sentiment unlikely to be stated by Chirac. During last summer's war between Hezbollah and Israel, Sarkozy defended Israel's right to defend itself against an organization he described as the "one aggressor" in the conflict. He also stated that France should have committed troops to Lebanon more quickly during the war.

During the presidential campaign, Sarkozy also expressed concern about Iran's close ties to Hezbollah, saying that "there are more than suspicions about the links between Hezbollah and Iran," and he emphasized that he would support aggressive sanctions against Tehran should he win. His new prime minister, Francois Fillon, also criticized Socialist candidate Ségolène Royal during the campaign for meeting with a Hezbollah representative and failing to condemn his criticism of the United States and Israel. "Accepting to speak with a member of Hezbollah, which advocates the destruction of Israel, was already a mistake," Fillon said. "Letting him insult France's allies--whether they are the United States or Israel--without reacting, is another serious mistake." ...

Herein a rub:

...Even with French support, however, a European designation of Hezbollah is by no means guaranteed. A complicating factor is the presence of European military forces in Southern Lebanon as part of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon, which is charged with monitoring the cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah in the wake of last summer's war. France, Spain, Belgium, and other European nations which have deployed troops might be concerned that a designation could destabilize the country further, putting their own military forces at increased risk...

UN peacekeepers are more properly referred to as "hostages."

Cracks in the Fox's Image

I commented about my skepticism concerning the image of German General Irwin Rommel before:

I've never thought much of these "good German" protests -- I hear that rather frequently with regard to people like Irwin Rommel, who, it never ceases to be pointed out, was not a Nazi, didn't much like them and ended up plotting against Hitler. Of course, he also did his darndest to fight the Nazi military cause and didn't turn against his Fuhrer until it was clear Germany was losing. I'm sure he had his mitigations, but they've always seemed thin to me.

Now, via Mick Hartley, this story in The Scotsman: Desert Fox or Hitler's poodle?

THE gentleman-warrior image of Desert Fox general Erwin Rommel has been shattered in a new German documentary, which paints him as a lickspittle of Adolf Hitler whose victories were meant to pave the way for the export of the Holocaust to the Middle East.

The controversial two-part programme, aired this week, claims that if Rommel had succeeded in driving the Eighth Army, under Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, out of North Africa, he would have led his troops into Palestine to begin the round-up, deportation and executions of Jews living there - many of them Germans who had managed to escape Nazism.

The programme - Rommel's War, Rommel's Treasure - claims the plans for the widening of the Holocaust out of Europe were far advanced.

Much of the material for the programme was based on what was found within the last three years in archives in the state of Baden-Württemberg, where Rommel lived. The makers also accessed hitherto sealed foreign ministry files in Berlin.

Jörg Müllner, a historian and co-producer of the programme, said: "The Allied defeat of Rommel at the end of 1942 had prevented the extension of the Holocaust to Palestine. If Rommel had beaten the Allies in the desert and invaded Egypt, a push into Palestine would have followed and the unit would have deployed there...

I believe we've read about this new material before.

Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, also makes an appearance:

..."The most important collaborator with the Nazis and an absolute Arab antisemite was Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem. He was a prime example of how Arabs and Nazis became friends out of a hatred of Jews."...

That's always been a fringe-benefit of anti-Semitism. No matter where he went, Hitler always had a cadre of ideological allies -- Jew haters who, no matter their other differences, had at least that in common.

Also linked by Mick is this excellent article by the incomparable Matthias Küntzel: Why We Cannot Criticize Israel that Way, wherein, more Husseini:

The majority of Arab Palestinians wanted to accept the United Nation’s two state solution in 1947. After all, at this time around 10, 000 Palestinians were working in predominantly Jewish-led industries such as citrus farming. But the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin el-Husseini, rejected the two state solution without consulting his fellow Palestinians and persuaded the leaders of the five neighboring Arab nations to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state by all means. The war of 1947-48, just as disastrous as it was avoidable...

Idiot Martyr

A biologist from Rutgers had his talk at Harvard canceled. He said it was because he called Alan Dershowitz a Nazi, but it was a bit more than that: Scientist says Harvard canceled talk

An evolutionary biologist from Rutgers University said he was told that a talk he was scheduled to give at Harvard University Friday was canceled because he compared Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz to a Nazi last week in a letter to the editor published in the Wall Street Journal.

Robert Trivers said he had been invited to speak at Harvard to celebrate a prestigious international award he recently won. He planned to discuss his research on self-deception, including how self-deception factored in Israel's invasion of Lebanon last year.

His letter in the Journal quoted from a missive he had sent directly to Dershowitz: "Regarding your rationalization of Israeli attacks on Lebanese civilians, let me just say that if there is a repeat of Israeli butchery toward Lebanon and if you decide once again to rationalize it publicly, look forward to a visit from me. Nazis -- and Nazi-like apologists such as yourself -- need to be confronted directly."

Dershowitz said in a telephone interview yesterday that he had sent Trivers's letter to Harvard police because he regarded it as a threat, but that he knew nothing about Trivers's talk being canceled.

But Trivers told the Globe on Friday that the letter was not a physical threat.

"Under no circumstances would I have threatened him physically," he said. "I would go see him in person."...

Here's a clue to idiot geniuses: Never call someone a Nazi (what would you DO to a real-life Nazi?) and say that you'll come see them in person if they continue their Nazi-like "butchery" unless you make it very clear your intent will be to talk. No, scratch that...never combine angry "you're a Nazi" talk with any hint of a personal visit. This is pretty much always a bad idea.

Should Harvard have canceled the talk? It's created one more idiot martyr who now has another topic for his speaking engagements. OTOH, If what's presented in the Globe article is accurate, a reasonable man who received such a note would be justified in my view of punching first and asking questions later if the author showed up at his door. It's a dangerous thing to start throwing around such rhetoric.

ADL: Anti-Semitism in Arab Media (Cartoon)

If that's how they act in Gaza

Hard-hitting, from Ze'ev Schiff:

The armed Palestinian organizations in the Gaza Strip are demonstrating once again what has become a norm among the Palestinians - that the agreements to which their leaders commit have no value. It's enough just to listen to Palestinian citizens complaining about how the cease-fire agreements there have no meaning. Agreements are made and signed, and immediately violated.

In this latest round of violence, the warring parties have already decided on a cease-fire five times. Each time, within hours, they were back to killing each other and injuring bystanders in the process. If this is how they behave among themselves, why should they be any more scrupulous in abiding by agreements with outside elements such as Israel, Jordan, Lebanon or Egypt? This is an important lesson that Israel must learn from the recent events in Gaza.

The phenomenon did not originate in Gaza. During the civil war in Lebanon in the 1970s and '80s, the Palestinians agreed to and signed more than 90 cease-fires. Most were violated with terrible bloodshed...

More.

Never Count a Drama Queen Out

People with internet experience should recognize a plea for attention when they see one. Here's how it works: Valued blogger/BBS participant decides for whatever reason they are under appreciated/not getting enough attention so they post a long message about how they are leaving/can't take it any more, etc...

This was never particularly serious, but instead merely meant to prompt what comes next -- the pleas to stay -- the emails, the private messages, the public postings...all very gratifying for the drama queen and very soothing and affirming to the ego. Sometimes this even prompts an "I never really meant it, I just said what I did to make YOU all look into yourselves...I'm glad you benefited"-type of message on the queen's return.

There are always people who wish the drama queen (not necessarily female) really meant it, but this is simply another benefit of the queen's show -- getting to know who her friends really are, and forcing her friends to take her even more seriously (and treat her even more gently) in the future.

Cindy Sheehan bears many of the characteristics of Fragile Femme, Bliss Ninny, Pinko, Issues and especially Ego.

Michael Graham on the Interests of the ACLU

Shut Down by 'Our Good Friends in Venezuela'

Joe Kennedy's pal, Hugo Chavez, has been busy shutting down the opposition, most recently Venezuela's #1 TV station. Dave Nalle at Blogcritics says:

Over the weekend the Venezuelan government under the autocratic rule of President Hugo Chavez shut down the one remaining independent broadcast outlet - the opposition television station Radio Caracas Television (RCTV). Twenty minutes after the station went off the air, its frequency was taken over by the official government network.

This is the culmination of a year of press oppression in Venezuela, including fining opposition newspapers for criticism of the government, arresting journalists on charges of 'defamation' for criticizing the government, the shutdown of opposition radio stations, beatings and harassment of journalists and photographers, and most recently, the assassination of an El Mundo photojournalist. Since Chavez was voted sole personal authority over the government and had the Venezuelan constitution rewritten to give the presidency additional powers, it has become increasingly difficult for those opposing him to speak out without placing themselves at considerable risk...


PMW: Palestinian promotion of child martyrdom

There's a never ending stream of it. Here's new material hot off the airwaves from Palestinian Media Watch: Palestinian promotion of child martyrdom

Part 1- Hamas TV continues promotion of Shahada (martyrdom) for children Part 2- Overview of the history of promotion of children's Shahada – Martyrdom pmwchild.jpg

Hamas TV continues active promotion of Shahada (martyrdom) directed at children. The new video clip, broadcast Sunday, follows the growth of a young Palestinian boy from a child into a Hamas Shahid – Martyr for Allah. The video shows the young child going to the mosque, praying and reading from the Quran, and then holding an automatic rifle together with the Quran as he envisions future participation in violent acts.

Click to view video on YouTube or PMW website

[See part 2 below for an overview of the history of this phenomenon including links to numerous videos encouraging children to be Shahid - Martyrs]

The child then matures into a Hamas fighter, is shown participating in battle against Israel, and eventually dying as a Shahid as the choir sings, “The pure blood will produce honor and glory.”

This video directs Palestinian children to aspire to Shahada, reiterating a recurring music video theme of seven years that Shahada is expected of children. “Honor and glory” and "Shahada is sweet" are some of these messages specifically packaged for children on Hamas TV and Fatah controlled PA TV.

PA schoolbooks likewise promote Shahada death among children. One example:

"O heroes... Do not talk yourselves into flight. Your enemies seek life while you seek death. These drops of blood that gush from your bodies will be transformed tomorrow into blazing red meteors that will fall down upon the heads of your enemies." [Reading and Texts Part II, Grade 8 (2002), p. 16]...

More at the PMW site.

Here's the video of Johnny marching off to martyrdom:


The Muslim Student Association's Angry Friends

At Family Security Matters, Luke Sheahan has an article on the Wahhabi-connected Muslim Student Association: The Muslim Students’ Association Associates with All the Wrong Folks:

...Prior to 9/11 MSA was involved with three Muslim charities: Holy Land Foundation (HLF), al-Aqsa Islamic Bank, and Beit el-Mal Holdings. Following the attacks the Treasury Department froze the bank accounts of these three organizations for ties to Hamas. Al-Talib, the Muslim newsmagazine at the University of California, Los Angeles, claimed that eight national organizations announced in a joint statement that the effort was simply a “politically-motivated smear campaign by those who would perpetuate Israel’s brutal occupation.” They suggested that the organizations were shut down to hurt Islamic poor and not to hinder Islamic radicals. Yet there seems not to be any wonder about what kind of organization the MSA itself is. According to Middle East Quarterly, “There is overwhelming evidence that the MSA, far from being a benign student society, is an overtly political organization seeking to create a single Muslim voice on U.S. campuses—a voice espousing Wahhabism, anti-Americanism, and anti-Semitism, agitating aggressively against U.S. Middle East policy, and expressing solidarity with militant Islamist ideologies, sometimes with criminal results.”

This is a sobering glimpse of what the MSA is up to on college campuses. More frightening is that according to the MSA itself, there are 600 MSA chapters in universities in America and Canada, 150 of which are affiliated with the national MSA. The College Democrats of America reportedly at their height have had 500 active chapters. It is disturbing that a group with political and financial ties to hostile foreign governments has a sufficiently significant number of chapters on college campuses to rival one of our major political parties. If it were simply a religious group promoting Islam, I wouldn’t be so worried. But as you can see, MSA associates with all the wrong folks.

Related: Daniel Pipes has gotten around to posting about his disrupted talk (one of many) at UCLA: In a post full of interesting tid-bits, one of the parts that stands out is the cavalier attitude of the administration toward the possibility of any sort of disciplinary action:

...As you know, as a public institution we are committed to creating an open environment which allows for the free exchange of ideas - no matter how controversial. As part of the planning process in advance of this Panel presentation, we set up a very successful security protocol.

There were more than four hundred people in the audience. An additional twenty or so protestors were silent and exited quickly without incident.

The four who overstepped the program's protocol were removed quickly and handled appropriately by university administrators and police.

We are committed to providing a secure environment for civil discourse. We believe this momentary interruption did not constitute a significant interference with your presentation or ensuing discussion...

Part of discipline is not just stopping the behavior, but ensuring it does not repeat. UCLA has lost the thread, and I'm quite sure this is the problem at most campuses these days.

American Mosques a Target of International Terrism?

They're getting the funding as though they were: WND: Mosques awarded Homeland Security grants - CAIR urges Muslim clerics to cash in on federal funds

While the European Union investigates mosques for ties to Islamic terrorism, the U.S. government is giving mosques security grants that are designed to protect churches, synagogues and other nonprofit groups from Islamic terror.

Most recently, the Islamic Society of Baltimore landed a $15,000 grant from the Department of Homeland Security to upgrade security at its Maryland mosque.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations since April has been urging leaders of mosques and Islamic schools across the nation to apply for the DHS grants, even though the agency's program was set up to help protect nonprofit facilities that are at high risk for attacks by Islamic terrorists.

In a recent "Action Alert" posted on its website, CAIR encouraged its Muslim members to take advantage of $24 million in federal funds DHS has made available – specifically, DHS says, for nonprofit organizations "deemed high-risk for a potential international terrorist attack."...

...U.S. officials who spoke to WND on condition of anonymity expressed dismay that CAIR would drain limited federal funds away from higher risk targets for terrorism. They argue mosques are among the lowest risk for such attacks.

In fact, a number of mosques across the nation actually have promoted Islamic terrorism and have been tied to Islamic terrorists, including the large Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Washington, where some of the 9/11 hijackers received spiritual guidance, as well as help obtaining housing and IDs.

Terrorism experts note some 80 percent of U.S. mosques are funded and controlled through the Saudi Arabian government.

"Mosques have tended to serve as safe havens and meeting points for Islamic terrorist groups," said terror expert Steve Emerson. "Of course, we are not referring to all mosques, but there are at least 40 episodes of extremists and terrorists being connected to mosques in the past decade." ...

[h/t: Daniel in Brookline]

Email with the Barnard President on Nadia Abu El-Haj

An interesting exchange between Barnard President Judith Shapiro and the Democracy Project's Phil Orenstein: Email Correspondences With Barnard President Shapiro

The following are excerpts from a flurry of email correspondences between Barnard President Judith Shapiro and myself regarding the tenure bid of Assistant Professor Nadia Abu El-Haj. Originally I had sent a letter to President Shapiro imploring that she do the right thing and deny tenure to this academic impostor who passes off a political agenda demonizing the State of Israel and its legitimate historic roots, as if it were methodical archaeological scholarship. Shapiro replied to my letter initiating the correspondence on an “unbecoming” note comparing me to the bumbling patsy, Mr. Collins in Jane Austin’s novel Pride and Prejudice, and SUNY Trustee Candace de Russy to her lordship, the blue-blooded Lady Catherine. This was all aimed at throwing up a smoke screen in order to divert attention from the serious issue of El-Haj’s upcoming tenure decision, since there seems to be a lack of credible defenses available to contest allegations of El-Haj’s scholarly falsehoods and slander of a distinguished archaeologist. One positive development that came out of this will be future meetings between Candace de Russy and Shapiro. Candace will try to convince her to deny tenure to El-Haj on the basis of faulty and misleading scholarship. For those intent on writing to President Shapiro, feel free to do so despite her whining about the “hysteria it is generating”. This may be one of those rare incidences of a bona fide academic debate taking place representing both sides of the coin, with input from genuine scholars, the Va’ad ha-Emet, which seems to send the academic establishment flying off into a tailspin...

Orenstein has a summary of the exchange.

Kindergarten of Hate

While we're donating money and finding ways to funnel cash in around the official Hamas government, let's take a look at the culture that pervades Palestinian Arab society...

This incredible video has been posted at YouTube and shows some sort of children's performance.

Children dressed as terrorists, children dancing with bloody hands...Charles (who has two posts on this, here and here) is exactly right when he remarks that the little girl dancing with bloody hands is intended to make heroism and example from the horrific lynching of two Israeli reservists lost in Ramallah:

20070527HamasKidsBlood.jpg

The poster has disabled embedding, so you'll have to watch it at YouTube, although I have uploaded it to VideoEgg in two parts (VideoEgg has a five minute limit) and you can watch it here for the time being. The girl with the bloody hands (by no means the only vile part of this) dances near the beginning of part two:

Update: Charles also has a copy posted here.

The anti-Zionist winds of Britain

Haaretz has a good editorial on the British boycotting business: Battle for Britain

...The number of British organizations calling for the boycott of Israel, their public campaigns, and their constant comparisons between Israel and the apartheid regime of South Africa have made the battle for British public opinion particularly significant.

On Wednesday, representatives of the new British University and College Union (UCU) will be meeting in Bournemouth. On the agenda is another proposal to boycott Israel's academic institutions. These proposals have become as regular and as predictable as Qassam attacks on Sderot. The fact that studies at the Sapir Academic College in Sderot are not taking place because of the constant rocket fire from Gaza, even though the college is not in occupied territory and Gaza is no longer occupied, apparently does not bother British academia. The fact that Hamas, which controls the Palestinian Authority, does not recognize even pre-1967 Israel, and commits acts of terror against civilians, does not matter either. These nuances did not stop one boycott initiator from saying last week that justice in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is entirely on one side...

...On the 40th anniversary of the Six-Day War, British academia should look realistically at peace efforts in the Middle East: Over the past decade, Israel has elected governments that have expressed the desire of a majority of Israelis for a bilateral solution of two states for two peoples and a withdrawal from most of the settlements. The withdrawal from Gaza was to have been the first stage. The victory of Hamas, which refuses to recognize Israel, cut off the process.

The anti-Zionist winds blowing in Europe, mainly in academia and in Britain, strengthen the position that the very birth of the Jewish state was a mistake. The European hard left regards the Law of Return as the root of all evil; however, without acknowledging the Jewish character of the State of Israel, there is not even a basis for dialogue. British academia is in fact demanding that Israel democratically cease to exist as a Zionist entity, and that it be swallowed up in the non-democratic region in order to pander to the latest trend.

Saturday, May 26, 2007

The Muslim American Society's Support for Terror

This article by Patrick Poole is 10 days old, but important and well worth reading. The Muslim American Society is closely tied to the Islamic Society of Boston. Cover-up and Deny. Poole notes an exchange between MAS's Mahdi Bray and counter-terrorism expert Daveed Gartenstein-Ross (who's book I highly recommend, btw) in which Bray is caught in a lie:

...In support of his argument, Gartenstein-Ross observed that even post-9/11, MAS had expressed support for terrorist activities in its magazine, The American Muslim:
Indeed, The American Muslim provides a snapshot of where MAS really stands on terrorism. The March 2002 issue includes a fatwa endorsing suicide bombings against Israelis, which states that "martyr operations are not suicide and should not be deemed as unjustifiable means of endangering one's life." The fatwa goes on to say that in suicide bombings, "the Muslim sacrifices his own life for the sake of performing a religious duty, which is jihad against the enemy."

But in his published defense of his organization, Mahdi Bray categorically denied that such a fatwa endorsing suicide attacks in Israel even existed:

Additionally, Mr. Ross asserts that a fatwa (religious opinion) in our March 2002 American Muslim magazine supports suicide bombing. There is absolutely no such fatwa in the March 2002 edition of the American Muslim magazine.

Just weeks after this exchange, the American Muslim website went dark, or more appropriately, white. A common practice for those who want to eliminate items from the web cache of search engines, such as Google, is to remove the page and replace it with a blank white screen to clear the information out of web cache. This is what happened to the American Muslim magazine website.

But one area that website owners cannot control is the various Internet archive sites that regularly catalogue the contents of the World Wide Web. It is here that the evidence supporting Mr. Gartenstein-Ross’ claims about the missing MAS martyrdom fatwa resides. In fact, the Internet Archive houses the past issues of American Muslim, and preserves intact a copy of the missing fatwa that Mahdi Bray vigorously denied existed...

Shades here of Emerson vs. MPAC.

Not only does the fatwa justifying suicide terror exist, but it's right next to a fatwa by the Muslim Brotherhood's own Sheik Yussef al-Qaradawi (Qaradhawi)...the radical anti-American sheik the Islamic Society of Boston has gone to much trouble to deny any connection to.

The fatwa (Sheikh Faysal Mawlawi: "Martyr operations are not suicide and should not be deemed as unjustifiable means of endangering one’s life.") concerns blowing yourself up in some circumstances, particularly in this case by "Palestinians." As I discussed in my post on that recent and disturbing Pew poll (What are the percentages?) regarding American Muslim attitudes toward this sort of thing, you'd have to be utterly delusional to imagine you can justify this kind of thing in one circumstance and not imagine the idea will spread once the concept is out of the bag.

If there is a problem among American Muslims, you can look to groups like the Muslim American Society as part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Speaking about part of the solution, here's Zuhdi Jasser at Hot Air.

Peretz: A Short History of the Palestinian Refugees

What you need to know:

...the very nomenclature of refugee is politically false. Yes, some of them were forced out of their towns and villages or left in the midst of heavy fighting now 60 years ago. They all expected, anticipating an Arab victory by the invading armies, to come back and some hoped to kill their Jewish neighbors on their return. Whatever! As it happens, they found themselves in the great and neighborly Arab homeland of what they called "the one Arab nation," not as tens of other millions cast far away into a hostile environment. A crossing of maybe 25 miles into an abutting province where people speak the same tongue, practice the same religion and purport to be of one ethnic seed is not truly an exile. Forgive me, I am not being harsh.

Now, it is a fact that the Palestinians were not over time truly made welcome. This shows something of the sham of the one Arab nation. The sham of the fraternity of their Arab brothers. But the Palestinians--many thinking themselves South Syrians, others Jordanians, and still others in some way Egyptians--were not exactly thankful guests. In Iraq, they aligned themselves with the tyrant. In Jordan, they stirred up a revolution that brought "Black September" on their heads. In Kuwait, they cheered when Saddam invaded. In Lebanon or, to be more precise, in southern Lebanon they set up a brutal mini-state run by Yassir Arafat and his minions that over-lorded their hosts. The Saudis were canny: they did not allow them in in the first place.

Sixty years on the international dole, with additional cash from the always so-loving Scandinavians, has actually castrated them. I use this masculine metaphor because it seems to illumine the contrast between the bravado of the Palestinians in Lebanon (but not just in Lebanon) and their powerlessness in any other way but to wreak havoc. This is not exactly power...


The British Architects are Back

Back to boycotting. For prior background, see previous series of posts, linked here: NY Javits Center architect says he backs security barrier.

Now: British architects join anti-Israel fray

Leading British architects have joined the academic world and have accused their counterparts in Israel of complicity in schemes that contribute to the "social, political and economic oppression of Palestinians," the British The Guardian reported Saturday.

The architects, including Will Alsop, Terry Farrell, Richard MacCormac, Royal Institute of British Architects president Jack Pringle and president-elect Sunand Prasad, have signed a petition organized by the group Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine.

"APJP asserts that the actions of our fellow professionals working with these enterprises are clearly unethical, immoral and contravene universally recognized professional codes of conduct," a spokesman said. "We ask the Israeli Association of United Architects (IAUA) to meet their professional obligations to declare their opposition to this inhuman occupation."...


Emerson vs. MPAC

Terrific video of Steven Emerson delivering one of the best live come-backs you could imagine to Edina Lekovic, spokeswoman for the Muslim Public Affairs Council on the Larry Kudlow show. Emerson slams Lekovic's protestations to moderation right back at her.

Steven Emerson is one of the defendants in the Islamic Society of Boston's defamation lawsuit. They don't want him talking.

Friday, May 25, 2007

Radio Appearance: Richmond, VA

I'll be on the air tomorrow (Saturday) morning at 7:39 AM with the Lee Brothers on WRVA-AM Richmond, VA to discuss The Silencing. If you're an early riser and in the area perhaps you can tune in. It's a little early for me, but I'll manage! (I hope) Hey, they wear American Flag shirts, so they must be worth waking up for.

Slaves of New York

Bribery Claimed in NY Slave Labor Case

Varsha Mahender Sabhnani of Long Island, N.Y., waits in a car at Nassau County police headquarters in Mineola, N.Y., after her arrest on forced labor charges Tuesday, May 15, 2007. Sabhnani, 35 [!!! whoa], and her husband, Mahender Murlidhar Sabhnani,51, who operate a worldwide perfume business, are accused of keeping two Indonesian women as slaves in their luxurious Long Island home and abusing them for years...

CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. -- The mother of a woman accused of keeping two Indonesian women as slaves tried to bribe a victim's relative to make the case go away, prosecutors said.

The accused woman, Varsha Mahender Sabhnani, and her husband, Mahender Murlidhar Sabhnani, were being held in jail on Friday, a day after the new charges arose at their arraignment.

The millionaire couple _ who operate a worldwide perfume business out of their Long Island home _ pleaded not guilty to federal slavery charges.

They were arrested last week after one of the servants, wearing only pants and a towel, was found wandering outside a doughnut shop in Syosset, on the region's so-called Gold Coast. Authorities concluded she escaped the Sabhnanis' nearby Muttontown home when she took out the trash.

Unable to speak English fluently, she showed her wounds and Indonesian passport to a shop worker and said, "Mister, mister, I want to go home _ Indonesia," said Indonesian Foreign Ministry spokesman Kristiarto Legowo.

Prosecutors said Thursday that Varsha Sabhnani's mother, who lives in Indonesia, tried to make the case go away by bribing a son-in-law of one of the servants with the equivalent of $2,500. They also said Varsha Sabhnani had earlier told the other victim that her husband, who still lives in Indonesia, would be arrested unless she followed orders.

"The defendants operated a torture house," federal prosecutor Mark Lesko said. "They are capable of acts of violence."...

...Legowo said the two women came from Indonesia's West Java province and were brought to the New York area in 2002 by Varsha Sabhnani, who was born in Indonesia and speaks Indonesian...

...Prosecutors said the women were beaten, scalded and forced to climb stairs repeatedly and take as many as 30 showers in three hours _ all as punishment for perceived misdeeds. They said one was forced to eat 25 hot chili peppers at one time.

They have since been cared for by Catholic Charities, according to a spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement...

In other anti-slavery news:

Congratulations to former slave Francis Bok on the occasion of his earning his US Citizenship this past May 18.

Francis came to the United States as a refugee in 1999, three years after he escaped from his master in Northern Sudan. He is pictured here with his wife, Atong, and two children, Buk (1 ½) and Dhal (11 weeks).

Cool Military Pic of the Day -- Tomb Sentinel

A Paper Advocacy Group

Terrific piece by Patrick Poole on just how little of even the American Muslim Community CAIR actually represents: CAIR by the Numbers

...their new 2006 Annual Report and their recently posted 2005 IRS Form 990 shows that CAIR continues to hemorrhage members. Whereas my estimates for 2004 showed that based on their membership receipts in that period they had approximately 4,761 dues-paying members, in 2005 their membership plummeted dramatically to an estimated 2,615. This puts CAIR on the same comparative membership level as the American Indian Kaw Nation in Kansas, the Cleveland Section of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, the Society for News Design, the University of Texas Longhorn Alumni Band, and the South Dakota chapter of the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), none of whom are consulted near as frequently by Beltway politicians or sought after for comment by the media establishment as CAIR.

The steep decline in CAIR membership is directly correlated in membership receipts (line 3 of the Form 990), which dropped off from $119,029 in 2004 to $65,377 – a decrease of $53,652, or almost half (45 percent) of the previous year’s membership revenues. If this trend continues at the same pace, their 2006 Form 990 numbers will show $29,419 in membership revenues, representing only 1,177 members, roughly comparable to the membership of the Genealogical Society of Rockingham County, Virginia and the Garden Club of Tacoma, Washington – neither of which has a Washington DC lobbying office...

There's much more.

cairiran.jpg
At a dinner hosted by CAIR, Board Vice-Chair Ahmad Al-Akhras and Executive Director Nihad Awad welcome former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami to speak on the importance of civilizational dialogue. [From the Table of Contents of CAIR's Annual Report.]

Via Miss Kelly, who also discusses CAIR's inflated population figures: CAIR Estimate of American Muslims Off by 6 Million

Israel-US ties: Questions for the Candidates

Interesting feature at the Jerusalem Post as they asked John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson and Sam Brownback (sorry, no Ron Paul) "What's the importance of Israel as a strategic ally and how would your administration manage ties between the two countries?" All the answers are what you'd call "strongly pro-Israel." In fact, some are quite inspiring.

[via the Bald Headed Geek]

'Only a small and shrinking fraction of racist and misinformed Jews...'

So said Mazin Qumsiyeh. In fact: 9,000 celebrate Israel at Foxboro sports complex. Reality has never been Qumsiyeh's strong suit.

Annual Israel event attracts largest attendance to date

Israel supporters came out in droves to the home of the New England Patriots on Sunday to participate in the revamped New England Celebrates Israel event. Held at the Dana-Farber Field House at Gillette Stadium, the event – known formerly as Boston Celebrates Israel – was an all-day bazaar, showcasing the best of what both the Jewish state and the local Jewish community have to offer.

Presented by Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston and Gillette Stadium, the event kicked off at 1 p.m. And while an early rainstorm dampened many attendees on their way from the security tent to the indoor facility, the mood inside the complex was festive.

“I’ve been in this field house many times,” said Myra Kraft, chairwoman of the board at CJP, “and I can honestly say that I’ve never seen … a better example of a community – or a team – coming together for a purpose.”

The Dana-Farber Field House, the Patriots’ practice facility, was donated for use at the event by Pats owner Robert Kraft, who – along with his wife, Myra – welcomed the crowd of more than 9,000 from the main stage...

Hey Amherst, try doing something positive for once, you might attract a few more flies.

Activists Converge on the Massachusetts State House!

OK, sure, it's a few minutes early...maybe everyone's just late:

[crickets]

BOSTON PROTEST OF ANDREW CARD HONORARY DEGREE UMASS STUDENTS, STAFF, FACULTY, AND COMMUNITY WILL DEMONSTRATE ON BEACON HILL

Staff, students and faculty from the Amherst campus of the University of Massachusetts, as well as members of the larger Amherst-area community and citizens from elsewhere in the Commonwealth, will converge at the Massachusetts State House tomorrow for the latest in a series of protests over the university's decision to award an honorary degree to former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card.

Demonstrators' plans include a street theater performance about Card's efforts to manage the White House's unwarranted and probably illegal wire-tapping program, as well as his active role in the White House Iraq Group (along with Karl Rove, Conoleeza Rice and Scooter Libby) in promoting the U.S. invasion of Iraq on the basis of information known to be false.

Students dressed as a "wire-tapping intelligence team" will attempt to wire-tap University of Massachusetts president Jack Wilson's office (225 Franklin Street). Others will stage a "die-in" as a reminder of Andrew Card's participation in selling a war that has taken the lives of 650,000 Iraqis and 3400 Americans so far, not to mention more than 25,000 wounded U.S. soldiers and
contractors.

The demonstration will begin on Wednesday, May 23, at 12:30 p.m. at the State House. Protesters will march to 225 Franklin Street through the financial district. The wiretapping, die-in and other protests at President Wilson's office will begin at 1 p.m.

Please, Boston residents!! join us at an event supported by umass students, faculty and staff and local and statewide anti-war coalitions and community members. This is the largest collaboration and campaign to come from the umass campus and community in years. There is just too much wrong with the proposal to honor someone like Card.

Katherine Mallory
STPEC Internship Advisor
E-27 Machmer Hall, UMass
stpecinternship (at) sbs.umass.edu
office: 413-545-0043

Gotta love the way a UMass official uses school resources to organize against her employer. Ah well, it is a long drive from Amherst...

The police were ready:

What's a protest without a little plumber's crack?

Yes sir, officer, no we're not the Blues Brothers, officer...

A disappointed Solomonia operative (who took the photos) reports from the scene:

yep, all 8 of them showed up.

Where are the promised performers? Where are the puppets? Whom do I complaint? Well, they did seem to have couple small drum-like objects when they started walking down the street.

"Students dressed as a "wire-tapping intelligence team" Aahh, that's why they were in cheap black suits...

People, this is very embarrassing. Berkeley kicks our ass again.

Nobel laureate cancels UK trip over Israel boycott

Good for Steven Weinberg:

An academic and Nobel laureate has cancelled a planned visit to a London university because of what he perceives to be "a widespread anti-Israel and anti-semitic current in British opinion".

Steven Weinberg, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin, had been invited to Imperial College in July to speak in honour of a Pakistani physicist, Abdus Salam, and to deliver a talk at a conference on particle physics.

But today in a letter to his host at Imperial, Michael Duff, Prof Weinberg said he was withdrawing from the trip.

In the letter, the professor said his decision was triggered by an agreement by the National Union of Journalists at its national conference to boycott Israeli products.

He wrote: "I know that some will say that these boycotts are directed only against Israel, rather than generally against Jews.

"But given the history of the attacks on Israel and the oppressiveness and aggressiveness of other countries in the Middle East and elsewhere, boycotting Israel indicated a moral blindness for which it is hard to find any explanation other than anti-semitism."

A spokeswoman for Imperial said it was "very sad" about the professor's decision.

Prof Weinberg said the only other reason he could imagine for the boycott was the NUJ's "desire to pander to the growing Muslim minority in Britain".

This is the second time Prof Weinberg, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 1979, has cancelled a visit to a UK university because of Israeli boycotts...

[via Judith Apter Klinghoffer]

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Where the words come from

Adam Holland takes off from the post below, Presbyterian Church (USA) Commemorates 40 Years Since Israeli Victory, to point out the naive use of terminology with a definitive history: When it comes to Israel, the Presbyterians don't know their nakba from their naksah:

...The use of the term "nakba" for the Israeli War of Independence was an innovation of Constantin Zureiq, the intellectual father of the Arab Nationalist Movement and a key influence on the founders of the Baathist party. Zurieq used the term in the title of his book about the 1948 War, ''Ma'na al-Nakba'' (The Meaning of the Disaster)...

The well-meaning but ill-informed have long been susceptible to adopting the arguments and terminology both of racist Arab nationalism and the opponents of Israeli existence. Their misunderstanding of the ways in which they have been used is a frequent source of frustration between the people who understand this and the ones who don't and can't understand how their "best of intentions" are causing all this anger. Targeting Christians as dupes in this manner is actually a frequent and intentional tactic.

Torture, Al-Qaeda Style

Why we fight, at The Smoking Gun: 0524072inside1.jpg

Drawings, tools seized from Iraq safe house in U.S. military raid

MAY 24--In a recent raid on an al-Qaeda safe house in Iraq, U.S. military officials recovered an assortment of crude drawings depicting torture methods like "blowtorch to the skin" and "eye removal." Along with the images, which you'll find on the following pages, soldiers seized various torture implements, like meat cleavers, whips, and wire cutters. Photos of those items can be seen here. The images, which were just declassified by the Department of Defense, also include a picture of a ramshackle Baghdad safe house described as an "al-Qaeda torture chamber." It was there, during an April 24 raid, that soldiers found a man suspended from the ceiling by a chain. According to the military, he had been abducted from his job and was being beaten daily by his captors. In a raid earlier this week, Coalition Forces freed five Iraqis who were found in a padlocked room in Karmah. The group, which included a boy, were reportedly beaten with chains, cables, and hoses. Photos showing injuries sustained by those captives can be found here.


Hamas in their own words: Ideology of Hatred and Genocide

Palestinian Media Watch has a large collection of quotes: The Hamas Ideology of Hatred and Genocide: Islamic supremacy over the world, destroying Israel and Jews, promoting terror and violence

In light of the escalating conflict between Hamas and Israel, it’s important to review the Hamas ideology and understand how Hamas views the conflict.

Hamas ideology, as expressed in the Hamas Charter, sees Hamas as part of the worldwide Muslim Brotherhood (Article 2) that seeks world Islamic domination. Israel is said to exist on territory that is Islamic Waqf (Article 11) and therefore Islam demands that Israel be destroyed. Accepting Israel's existence is a violation of Islamic law (Article 13).

The Hamas charter presents the killing of Jews as God's will, and the inevitable extermination of Jews as coinciding with the "Hour of Resurrection" (Article 7). The charter expresses eagerness to participate in and promote this killing of Jews: "Hamas has been looking forward to implement Allah's promise [killing Jews] whatever time it might take" (Article 7). Finally, violence and terror (called "resistance") are presented as legitimate tools.

All of these principles continue to be stated regularly by Hamas leadership and in the official Hamas media throughout May 2007.

Part 1: Islamic supremacy over the world
Part 2: Destruction of Israel
Part 3: Demonization and extermination of Jews
Part 4: Promoting terror, suicide terror, and violence...


Fact-checking at CBS?

Good luck with that. CAMERA is trying to bring shareholder pressure to bear on CBS-owned Simon and Schuster: CAMERA at CBS Shareholders Meeting Challenges Carter's Publisher

Yesterday, the New York Sun's Gary Shapiro reported on CAMERA's efforts to promote fact-checking and standards of accuracy in non-fiction books in the wake of the appearance of Jimmy Carter's error-filled Palestine, Peace Not Apartheid published by Simon and Schuster. CAMERA is calling on the CBS Corporation, owner of Simon and Schuster, to urge its subsidiary to institute fact-checking. A proposal in this regard was presented from the floor of the CBS Annual Shareholders meeting yesterday by a CAMERA Board Member.

The CBS Corporation Web site states that CBS is "committed to the highest standards of ethics and integrity in all that we do..." If that's the case, there should be no question about CBS urging its important publishing subsidiary to institute ethical standards that assure accuracy in the production of non-fiction books.

S&S VP of Corporate Communications Adam Rothberg is quoted by the Sun on the controversy saying the publishing company "recognizes and accepts that readers may disagree with the facts and opinions as presented by its authors." What Rothberg doesn't evidently recognize and accept is that Simon and Schuster bears any responsibility for the factual integrity of "non-fiction" books it prints, promotes and profits from. S&S continues to cast itself as immune from accountability.


Tashbih Sayyed, 1941-2007

From Robert Spencer:

With great sorrow I must inform you that Tashbih Sayyed, a courageous foe of the global jihad, has passed away. image002.jpg

After a long career at Pakistan Television, Tashbih's differences with the Zia ul-Haq regime in Pakistan (which gave the Islamization of Pakistan its first great boost) led him to come to the United States, where he founded two newspapers, Pakistan Today and Muslim World Today, and wrote eight books, including Mohammad – A Secularist's View. He appeared in documentaries including Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West. He was the President and founder of The Council for Democracy and Tolerance, an adjunct fellow of the Hudson Institute, and a member of the Jihad Watch Board.

Tashbih was insightful, humorous, and above all, fearless in his opposition to the jihad ideology of Islamic supremacism. Despite numerous threats and a relentless barrage of insults and personal attacks, he kept on trying to awaken the world to the magnitude of the threat we face, never trimming his truth-telling to fit current fashion.

He was a dear friend, and he will be greatly missed.

May his memory be eternal.


Slanting the answers for the audience

Judith Apter Klinghoffer has a look at the methodology behind that poll: Self Consciousness Mars Muslim American Poll?

...Does self censorship explain the large percentage of people who refused to express an opinion on those controversial questions? For example 32% refused to express an opinion on 9/11, 27% refused to say whether they looked favorably of unfavorably on Al Qaeda, 23% did not express an opinion on Israel's right to exist and 9% had no opinion or refused to comment on suicide bombings.

Is it possible that the young ended up looking more radical simply because they are naturally less concerned with how their community may be perceived and therefore more truthful?...


Wednesday, May 23, 2007

What are the percentages?

While Best of the Web takes a more sanguine view, Ace has the must-read today on the newly released Pew poll of American Muslim opinion: Media Spins/Spikes Disturbing Finding That Quarter of American Muslim Young Men Support Terrorism.

I heard Bilal Kaleem of the local Muslim American Society (MAS) on the radio today spinning things as best he could, but the callers weren't buying it. I wouldn't take much that the MAS says about this very seriously. After all, they're part of the problem.

You can only moan about American Imperialism and then combine it with a culture of martyrdom so long before there'll be some blowback. Europe thought they could appease the culture of hate by telling themselves it's only about the Jews or other such nonsense, but then the bombs went off in London and Madrid and the cars started burning down the Champs-Elysee.

The human mind is wonderful at seeing and creating associations. Justifying suicide terror against Israel and the Jews and imagining that that genie will stay within the bounds of his bottle is a fantasy. It's only a matter of time before the rationalizations that allow for suicide terror in one place begin to resonate elsewhere for situations that the mind begins to view as analogous. The cognitive dissonance that those walls are set up against can't long stand, and the Middle East has paid for it with mass murder and self destruction in Iraq and Egypt and Lebanon and elsewhere, and the poison has spread to second generation residents in Europe. Is America next?

There are answers. Say no to any Middle Eastern funding for ideological outposts. Accept no excuses. Justifying hate and murder in one place and imagining it's for "export only," or just a cultural difference that need not concern us is delusional. There's an ocean of hate out there. If this poll makes things look bad (or "concerning" at the very least), we need to make sure the walls of the dam are broad and thick, and that we keep drying up the puddles that form on this side. Things aren't going to get any better. They could get a whole lot worse.

St. Petersburg Radio Appearance

I was just on WTWB in St. Petersburg, Florida on the Lynne Breidenbach Show discussing my article, The Silencing. If you're in the area and missed it, maybe they replay it at some point.

Amnesty International is a Serious Organization...?

Not surprising from this increasingly morally confused group. Best of the Web observes:

We're Speechless

You just have to see this to believe it, so here's a screen shot. It's from the Web site of Amnesty International USA, a group we thought wanted to be taken seriously:

It's for real. Click the image above to see the full screen shot, or on the headline atop this item to see the original page (assuming some adult hasn't stepped in and taken it down).

The original has an animated gif that rotates between Vader, Hobgoblin...and Cheney.

Update: Charles has several additional tidbits on this.

A Saudi Dissident's Version of 'If'

MEMRI: 'This Is Not a Western Conspiracy': Saudi Reformist Wajeha Al-Huwaidar Publishes Sequel to Her Satirical Poem 'When'

..."When your young children come home from school and tell you that they learned that day that the 'others' are despicable people who do not deserve any respect, acceptance, or appreciation, and that God commanded them to hate ['the others'] and to fight them, at all times and everywhere - this is an institutionalized plan for disseminating hatred. Don't worry, this is not a Western conspiracy against you; this is a product of your own country…

"When you are banned from many of the opportunities given to others, like studying, working, and the basics of living in dignity, just because you do not make hypocritical displays [of loyalty] to corrupt high officials and do not flatter the clerics who enjoy the favors of the regime - beware not to think that this is a Western conspiracy that has been hatched against you; this is a product of your own country.

"When all the years of your life are stolen from you… and your vitality, your mind, and your soul are wrested away, all in the name of religion, customs, traditions… and an outmoded heritage - and you know that this has usurped your right to life - don't weep and don't cry, and don't imagine that this is a Western conspiracy against you; these are actions and behaviors that are a product of your own country.

"When everything around you, around the clock, reminds you that you are a worthless human being in the view of the political or religious powers, and that you and the soil on which your shoe treads are equals, for the sole reason of your being the citizen of an Arab land - this is the height of arbitrary [rule]. But know that this is not a Western conspiracy that has been hatched against you; this is a product of your own country…

Not quite as pithy as If, but still quite powerful.

Presbyterian Church (USA) Commemorates 40 Years Since Israeli Victory

In their own way I suppose. A Presbyterian emailer writes:

...the Presbyterian News Service is making another publicity push at promoting a pro-Palestine agenda under the umbrella of Peacemaking and and a call for prayer for Middle East Christians. Many of us feel that content and tone of the materials recommended by PCUSA sponsors of the "Week of Prayer and Witness with Christians in the Middle East" are not consistent with the spirit and intent of the commissioners to the 217th General Assembly who specifically removed the one-sided pro-Palestine, anti-Israel language of the PCUSA 216th General Assembly resolution in 2004 that had called for the initiation of a phased, selective divestment process that could result in the divestment in companies that do business in Israel and replaced that language with positive language of investing in peaceful efforts in the Middle East.

As we all know, prayer for Christian minorities throughout the world is appropriate every day of the year, especially for those Christians who are being persecuted or are forced to live as second class citizens in countries governed by Islamic law.

In this regard, however, some of us believe that the selected week for the PCUSA sponsored Week of Prayer and Witness with Christians in the Middle East may possibly reflect the desire on the part of pro-Palestine activists within the PCUSA to project an attitude of "solidarity" with all Palestinians since the PCUSA week of prayer was timed to precede shortly before the secular Palestinian plans for "Six Days of Action against the Occupation of Palestine" from June 6-12, 2007 to "mark forty years since the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 Six Day War". Some PCUSA pro-Palestine activists have even used the Arabic term " Nakba" meaning “catastrophe” to describe the results of the 1967 "Six Day War".

For those who want to access reference materials as a supplement to and/or as an alternative to the reference materials produced by the PCUSA for this week of prayer for Christians in the Middle East, please refer to the resource materials developed and produced by Rev. James Berkley, Director of Presbyterian Action for Faith and Freedom at the Institute on Religion and Democracy [here].

For those not familiar, readers are likely to find the proposed IRD reading materials far less objectionable than the orginal PC(USA) fare.

Cool Military Pic of the Day -- Sea Sparrow

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

NGO Monitor Blasts Amnesty Bias

NGO Monitor takes apart Amnesty International's latest report and says:

...This study, which also includes a qualitative section focusing on the language used in reports, shows that Amnesty singled out Israel for condemnation to a far greater extent than Iran, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Egypt, and other chronic abusers of human rights. This evidence of a clear political agenda is consistent with other studies and examples of Amnesty International's bias and lack of credibility...

YNet covers the report here: NGO watchdog says Amnesty released more documents on Israel than Sudan in 2006

...One of the report's key findings was that Amnesty released more documents condemning Israel than Sudan in the past year.

"The number of publications devoted to Israel (excluding urgent actions) (48 documents) is significantly higher than other countries in the region, such as Hizbullah (17 documents), the Palestinian Authority (10 documents), Saudi Arabia (2 documents). The number of documents (excluding urgent actions related to Israel) (48) is even higher than the number of significant publications by Amnesty on Sudan (37)," the report said.

NGO Monitor also examined Amnesty's record during the Second Lebanon War, and concluded that the human rights organization was guilty of double standards in its treatment of Hizbullah and Israel.

Amnesty accused "Israel of targeting residential areas without mentioning Hizbullah's systematic practice of operating from within civilian areas," the report said, adding: "Many of Amnesty's claims regarding the Lebanon War were false or severely lacking in credibility."

In addition, "no statements or documents of any type were issued condemning Hizbullah for abducting two Israeli soldiers, despite Amnesty's core mission of promoting freedom for political prisoners," the NGO Monitor report said...

AI's Israel director responds:

"There is an expectation of Israel and other democratic states to abide by a higher standard than Sudan. I would suggest NGO Monitor address the content of documents, rather than count their words. That way they will be able sympathize with the suffering of non-Jews," Vidan said.

Nice.

MEMRI TV: Syrian Author Muhammad Nimr Al-Madani: Hitler Was Framed!

memridenial.jpg

Just the usual fare on Nazi Iranian television -- a little Holocaust denial, this time with a guest from Syria. It's almost like he's a real scholar or something.

MEMRI TV: Syrian Author Muhammad Nimr Al-Madani: Hitler Was Falsely Accused of Committing Genocide against the Jews

The following is an excerpt from an interview with Syrian author Muhammad Nimr Al-Madani, which aired on the Iranian News Channel on May 13, 2007: Muhammad Nimr Al-Madani: The secret about which few people talk today is that Europe wanted to get rid of the Jews. The Jews in Europe – and I emphasize Europe – were not very popular. Therefore, in order to get rid of the European Jews, the European countries had to accept the Zionist plan that was formulated, and to agree to the transfer of Jews to Palestine. Hitler agreed to this and agreed to the transfer of these Jews to Madagascar. This was Hitler's idea, in order to create a Jewish state on Syrian land. When Hitler occupied territories in East Europe, the idea of establishing a homeland and a state for these Jews arose. But the Europeans did not agree to this, because both Germany and England were each searching for ways to get rid of their Jews. Therefore, Hitler was falsely accused of committing genocide against the Jews. This is a lie, and we know full well that Hitler never did such a thing. It was a premeditated lie by the Zionist regime.

Zuhdi Jasser: Islamism, not Islam is the Problem

"It is Islamism, which deserves our combined energies in critique and ideological deconstruction. Muslims, however, who are anti-Islamist and practicing a modern moral Islam are the key to its defeat."

That's how Zuhdi Jasser (last written about here) concludes his lengthy examination of Islam vs. the Islamists at Family Security Matters: Islamism, not Islam is the Problem. A snip:

...It is important to be academic about this assessment and not assume that what appears to be the silence of the majority of Muslims equates to agreement with the Islamist leadership who exerts a stranglehold over the community. We are doing our national counterterrorism efforts and Muslims a disservice if we assume that the ‘lowest hanging fruit,’ which comprise all currently Islamist organizations (CAIR, MPAC, or ISNA - to name a few) and their proportionally limited membership speak for all American Muslims. Their silence on the need for reformation and the need for Muslims to lead an anti-Islamist effort from within our faith community represents their own Islamist agenda of the members and donors but does not represent the general Muslim population.

In debate, it can become easy to lose the focus of the argument when resorting to criticism based on identity rather than on ideology. For example, so many Islamists locally and nationally resort to attempting to demonize me as an individual rather than deal with my anti-Islamist ideas as a Muslim and as an American. Our Islamist enemy dreams about uniting all Muslims under one nation—the transnational Muslim ummah. To declare our ideological battle against Islam is to hand them the easiest tool toward that unification (ummah-tization) strategy for which they dream and to dismiss our most potent weapon against the jihadists—anti-Islamist Muslims who can lead a counter-jihad from within the Islamic community. Only anti-Islamists Muslims can de-ummahtize the Muslim community and articulate an Islam, which inspires morality but leaves national politics to the governments of our nations...



Monday, May 21, 2007

Pundit Review Audio

The audio from my "appearance" on WRKO's Pundit Review has now been posted at Kevin and Gregg's site, here. I think it skips the intro and starts right in with me talking, but other than that I'd expect it's the whole show. I can't listen because I really can't stand to listen to my own voice, and I also don't want to hear myself "uh uh uh" through the first minute or so as a search my brain for the name ABDURAHMAN ALAMOUDI (repeat after me). I think it gets better after that.

Thanks to the guys for posting it.

Oslo, RIP

Chapter 53,000. At Best of the Web:

Oslo, RIP

With civil war raging in Gaza, an Associated Press dispatch includes this interesting observation:

Hamas mounted accusations on its Web sites, radio and TV that Abbas-linked forces were working with Israel--a charge dismissed as "absurd" by a Fatah spokesman.

Yasser Arafat is in stable condition after dying at a Paris hospital, and Mahmoud Abbas is his successor as head of the Palestinian Authority and the Fatah political/terrorist movement. Fatah says it's "absurd" that it would be working with Israel against the terrorists of Hamas--but that of course was the entire point of the Oslo accords. It's a sad little postscript to President Clinton's peace efforts.

It's what Israel gave the Palestinian Authority training and 40,000 AK-47s to do. Can you believe it? Of course they never had any intention of enforcing law and order and a peaceful future.

Buy at Barnes and Noble -- Update

America Supports You: Bookseller Announces Large Donation

ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE, Md., May 18, 2007 - Bookselling giant Barnes and Noble opened a new chapter in its history today by announcing a donation of 300,000 items to America Supports You home-front groups.

“It’s such an honor for Barnes and Noble to provide books, games, and toys to members of the military community as a way to say thank you for all their services,” Marie Toulantis, chief executive officer of BarnesandNoble.com, said at a news conference during the Joint Services Open House here. “We’re very thankful to … all those involved in the America Supports You program for helping us get our gift to military members.”

The donation totaled $3.4 million and has benefited nine America Supports You home-front groups and military-affiliated nonprofit organizations.

America Supports You is a Defense Department program connecting citizens and corporations with military personnel and their families serving at home and abroad.

The journey that actually moved about 22 tractor-trailer loads of goods from Barnes and Noble to the various groups wouldn’t have happened without the network America Supports You has established, said Allison Barber, deputy assistant secretary of defense for internal communication and public liaison, the architect of the America Supports You program...

Update: Another reason to shop at Barnes and Noble...CAIR is mad at them:

The New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-NY) today expressed concern about an apparent attempt to block a reading by a Palestinian author at a bookstore in that state.

CAIR-NY has contacted Barnes & Noble about this issue. A news release issued today by the author’s agent stated:

“The previously announced book reading and signing of THE SCAR OF DAVID by Susan Abulhawa originally scheduled for Thursday, May 24, 2007, at 7:30 p.m. at the Bayside, N.Y., Barnes & Noble has been reduced to a "book signing" with no reading to occur.

“In explaining its reasoning, Barnes & Noble expressed several concerns including ‘sensitivity’ to the Jewish Community, space limitations of the store and the author's safety. Prior to the event at Barnes & Noble, Ms. Abulhawa is also expected to appear at Kingsboro Community College (Brooklyn - 4:15-5PM) where THE SCAR OF DAVID was required reading in a literature course this semester.

“The Scar of David is a work of historic fiction which reveals the untold brutal history of Israel's Occupation of a nation as also depicted by the recently released PALESTINE, Peace Not Apartheid by former USA President Jimmy Carter. Set in the lap of one of the 20th century’s most intractable political conflicts, through the course of this story, a Palestinian boy grows up as a Jewish Israeli, tangled in a truth he cannot reconcile, a would-be suicide bomber is given a name, a face, and life of a man pushed to grave limits, an Arab girl of pious and humble beginnings lives the 'American Dream,' and a nation of destitute refugees is forced to live under the general label of 'terrorists.'...

Amira Hass

New England Celebrates Israel

Wow, huge event at Gillette Stadium (home of the New England Patriots) yesterday. I was driving to the stadium (the event itself was actually held in the Dana Farber Field House) in a driving rain with my daughter, figuring there wouldn't be as many people there as I expected. Wrong. It was packed...really packed. They probably could have used twice the facility, and much more security to get people through faster -- after the long drive to Foxboro, it took us almost an hour and a half to get from the highway and into the event, and once in there were lines for everything and crowds everywhere.

So, I guess you'd call that a successful event with lessons learned for the next time out.

With one stain...apparently (I didn't see this happen) there was a group of assholes who showed up to disrupt the fun as best they could in the name of their pet issue -- the fact that the Arabs didn't manage to wipe out the Jews 60 years ago. You'll just have to bear with my language as I drop my usual academic facade (haha), I get a bit worked up when my kid is involved and people show up to intentionally ruin things.

I wouldn't ordinarily give them any attention, but you should go here and here, look at their pictures and remember their faces. They appear to be a part of this group, Zochrot, which has been running around doing "Nakba Day" propaganda. And look who's all over Zochrot's leadership...Neve Shalom -- the peace village. Neve Shalom actually had a booth at the event. Chutzpah. Maybe something can be done about that next year.

Update: I feel more guilty than ever about linking this, but for the record, you must see how weirdly delusional these people are by reading this account from Mazin Qumsiyeh. First, because it shows that Qumsiyeh can't tell the truth about even the most basic facts, "ofcourse it was only a small and shrinking fraction of racist and misinformed Jews in the area who joined the "celebration""...pal, it was more people than I've EVER seen at a similar event. The turnout was quite literally amazing. Then you can read how they planned for MONTHS to have a couple of women carry large banners up their skirts and stand there for 3 minutes doing their own photo-op. Cuckoo, cuckoo...

Four Nordic Stooges

I realize daylight comes in short gulps over the long Scandinavian winter, and those folks in the northlands may yet be waking from their long naps, but really, does it take four ex-Foreign Minsters to write this:

...Regardless of Syrian appearances, the definitive factor is nonetheless its desire to sit at the same negotiation table. Syrian commitment could mean that the danger of a new conflict between Hezbollah and Israel would decrease, that Hamas would become more moderate and send a message to Iran that it also should reevaluate its politics again...

Puh-lease. Yes, I'm sure Hamas is poised to become more "moderate" at any moment...and who knows how much worse Iran's politics would be should they sit and "reevaluate" them further.

Tundra Tabloids has the story of a silly op-ed by the former government high officials here, and here.

An opposite development in which President Bashar al-Assad's overtures are left unanswered, means without a doubt that Syria in the future will act destructively in Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq.

Give him what he wants, forget about Hariri and Lebanon, and maybe, just maybe, he'll behave like a rational, civilized being. The vikings are dead.

Smoke Over Sderot

Actually, some of these are Sderot, but the pictures of conflagrations were taken at nearby Kibbutz Nir Am. [Update: Carl in Jerusalem links to a report by Newton resident Masha Rivkin.]

Continue reading "Smoke Over Sderot"

How Much Personal Power Does One Man Think He Needs?

X-Ray Project in Italian

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Pundit Review

Big thanks go to the Pundit Review guys, Gregg and Kevin, for having me on their show on 680-AM WRKO for a full hour this evening. Audio should be posted within a day or two. Quite an interesting experience.

For those looking for the article we discussed tonight, The Silencing, you can go here for my very short intro first, or go straight to the Pajamas Media site and dive right into it by clicking here.

Fringes and Mainstreams

Jeff Jacoby:

...What if not derangement can explain such fever-swamp nuttiness as the findings of a new Rasmussen poll, which asked whether Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance? Among Democrats, 35 percent believe he did know and another 26 percent weren't sure. Only 39 percent said he didn't. In other words, nearly two out of three Democrats are unwilling to say that Bush wasn't tipped off to 9/11 in advance.

In another poll recently, respondents were asked whether they personally wanted Bush's new security strategy in Iraq to succeed -- not whether they expected it to, but whether they wanted it to. Among Democrats, a stunning 49 percent either hoped that the US plan would fail or couldn't make up their minds...


Saturday, May 19, 2007

Berman on Ramadan

For once one of those spammy emails from The New Republic has me wanting to read:

Can you keep a secret? OK, there are no secrets on the Internet. But I am excited to divulge to you the first word of an intellectual explosion that The New Republic will case in our June 4 issue. Paul Berman has written a 28,000 word essay--an incendiary pamphlet, really--about the extraordinary -though exemplary- case of the Islamicist thinker Tariq Ramadan, who has become the darling of liberal commentators in Europe and increasingly also in the United States. Berman's essay is a detailed examination of not only of Ramadan's thought, but more generally of Islamicist thought since the 1920s--and more, of the bizarrely cordial reception that certain strands of Islamicist thought have recently found in the West. Berman's essay is erudite and vivid, a model of the history of contemporary ideas. And a model also of the battle of ideas: Berman has written a stirring defense of the liberal ideal against its enemies (and even against some of its friends)--an unforgettable call to intellectual responsibility. People will be arguing about it for a very long time. Do not miss it...

...PS: In his research for this essay, Berman unearthed a fascinating exchange on the stoning of women in Islam between Ramadan and Nicolas Sarkozy. You will certainly want to read this.

I'm actually looking forward to reading this.

If you drop it on the floor, it's still safe 30 seconds later

Says a university study. Skittles have a much longer safe floor-life.

I kept wondering what happens if there's actually visible dirt stuck to the stuff?

Pounding Gaza

Odd (OK, not really) headline in the Globe today (from the Washington Post, actually): Israeli aircraft pound northern Gaza. Of course, Israeli aircraft have attacked a few targets in Gaza, but most of the article is about the civil war (they don't call it that) currently under way between Hamas and "relatively moderate" (haha) Fatah. Here's one of several jaw-droppers:

Israel said it attacked the Hamas targets in retaliation for Hamas rocket attacks that have panicked people in southern Israel.

Oh, just panicked...oh, well what are they making such a big deal about...

Well, the Arabs have been barraging the town of Sderot for years with rockets, and you can go over much of what's been happening there at the excellent site, Sderot Media -- schools and homes hit, people killed, wounded, traumatized. No one should be under any obligation to sit and let their neighbors lob high explosives at random into their town.

Meryl has a bunch of good recent posts on Sderot, here, here, here, and here.

You can buy stuff to support Sderot.

Friday, May 18, 2007

Trying Too Hard

Thanks to Hillel Stavis for sending these photos in. Create your own captions.

March of the wtfawi's?:

Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards

Much love and respect to my blogging friends who sent emails over the past few days (weeks?) trying to get votes in the Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards. Sorry, but I was keeping my big nose out of it. I was about to send people over there to check things out and vote only for blogs that had Solomonia in their links, but I see voting is now closed. Since the point of those awards is really to expose people to blogs they hadn't seen before, you can still go on over and click around a bit and maybe discover someone new who's to you liking. Hope my friends did well regardless.

Mubarak: Hamas will never sign a peace agreement with Israel

Mubarak lays it on the line about the Muslim Brotherhood, Palestine Branch, Hamas:

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak expressed great concern over the increasing strength of Hamas in talks with senior diplomatic officials on Wednesday, declaring that the organization will never sign a peace agreement with Israel, Haaretz has learned.

He said that the Egyptian government is at a loss regarding the future of the Gaza Strip. However, he also proclaimed that Egypt is making great efforts to end the Hamas government and support Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.

"With Hamas no way," he reportedly said.

Mubarak painted a dark picture of the situation with Hamas and said there was no chance for peace with the organization. "Hamas will never sign a peace agreement with Israel if it stays in power," the Egyptian president said.

Mubarak also said that Egypt did not accept Hamas in power, especially in light of its growing ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, which leads the opposition in Egypt. Mubarak sees the Brotherhood, which gained considerable power in Egypt's last parliamentary elections, as a threat to secular power...

And don't miss Avi Issacharoff's must-read analysis, here:

Four days into the current round in the Palestinian civil war in the Gaza Strip, with Fatah fighting Hamas, several phenomena have emerged:

1. Hamas has won every confrontation since fighting started Sunday. Its military dominance and supremacy are clear. Nearly all the fatalities have been from Hamas attacks. Even the five Hamas militants killed Wednesday died in an assault by their comrades against a Fatah force that took them hostage. Hamas is conducting itself like a military organization: It moves its forces, positions snipers, uses light artillery (mortars, for example), sets up ambushes in strategic locations, and systematically targets Fatah's leadership in the Gaza Strip, based on hit lists it has drafted.

2a. Fatah's leadership vacuum is the main reason for the group's defeat in the current round. Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas is still not showing signs of leadership. He is still afraid to take definitive action against Hamas, even though Hamas is harming the symbols of his authority. Last night he issued a statement, again, ordering a cease-fire, even though most of his men have been on the defensive since the fighting began and have not initiated action...


Cool Military Pic of the Day

Spirit of America: Army Request to Aid Afghan Farmers

I haven't posted anything from the Spirit of America folks in awhile. For those who don't know, SoA is a group that takes requests from soldiers in the field for materials to help with various "hearts and minds" projects. You can donate to specific projects,and 100% of donated funds go to the project in question. Overhead is funded separately. This looks worthwhile: Army Sergeant Major seeks supplies for destitute farm families in Afghanistan

Though incremental improvements are being made, Afghanistan has historically had one of the lowest standards of living in the world. This coupled with the fact that the Afghan economy continues to be overwhelmingly agricultural despite the fact that only 12% of its total land area is arable creates a ripe environment for extremists to prey on destitute citizens. An Army Sergeant Major wants to provide for Afghan farmers and their families in Southern Afghanistan. The SGM wrote to us that "the Taliban's biggest ally is that the local people are destitute and hungry for any good deed. We could use some good deed on our side, with your help"...

Go here to read more about the project and to consider giving.

Doctors Without Borders Employee Seeks Vengeance

OK, he's just a stinking terrorist: Shin Bet foils plot to kill Olmert

A Palestinian from the Gaza Strip who works for the humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders has been arrested for allegedly plotting to assassinate Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) revealed on Thursday.

Mazab Bashir, 25, from the Deir el-Balah refugee camp in Gaza, began working for Doctors Without Borders five years ago and received a permit from the IDF to travel to Jerusalem for work...

No good deed and all...Dr. Frankfurter points out that Medecins sans Frontieres (Doctors without Borders) has itself routinely exploited its mission for political purposes. Perhaps a little self examination is in order.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

The Silencing

[I'm going to leave this one on top for a little bit. Scroll down for new stuff.]

Let me introduce you to the John Doe's of Boston.

Pajamas Media has posted my lengthy, but I hope somewhat definitive, narrative of the events surrounding the Islamic Society of Boston and its wide-ranging lawsuit that's hit TV and print news outlets, activist groups and individuals. Though a truly comprehensive report that covered all of the twists and turns would have been far longer, this should be the perfect primer in getting you up to speed or clarifying some of the salient issues.

I really believe, and I think you'll agree when you read the piece if you're not already familiar with the situation, that this is an incredibly important case that deserves more attention outside the local community than it's gotten to this point.

The Silencing

Update: I was just on The Right Balance with Greg Allen. The discussion got more theoretical than I was expecting, and I had a little "phone malfunction" where someone else in my office picked up the line "Hello?" "Other line..." "Huh? Hello?" "Other line..." Uggg. Still. Thanks to Greg for having me on.

I will be on The Helen Glover Show on WHJJ in Providence just after 2 and Upfront w/Vicki McKenna on WIBA-AM Madison just after 5 today.

MEMRI TV: Teach the kids to love life

memrilovelife.jpg

Remarkable. Well worth watching and/or reading:

MEMRI TV: Former Dean of Islamic Law at Qatar University Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari Speaks Out against Suicide Operations and Declares His Support of American Presence in Iraq

The following are excerpts from an interview with Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari, former dean of Islamic law at Qatar University, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on May 11, 2007.

Modern Religious Discourse is Different from the Religious Discourse of the Prophet

Interviewer: "Do you think that modern religious discourse differs from the religious discourse of the Prophet?"

Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: "Of course. The proof is in the pudding. Today, there is a lot of extremism, a wave of extremism. This religious discourse has not managed to improve the youth, and this crisis proves it."

[...]

"This discourse does not address human beings as human beings. We lack what I call the 'culture of humanity.' We want to make our youth love human beings as human beings, before they love them for being Muslim or non-Muslim, Shi'ite or Sunni."

[...]

"The purpose of jihad is to respond to aggression and to eliminate injustice. The greater Jihad is the Jihad of the soul, of development, of education - so we can live - not just die - for the sake of Allah. Can what is happening in Algeria, Morocco, and Iraq be called jihad? A youth in the prime of life puts on an explosive belt, and blows himself up among innocent people, and you call this jihad and martyrdom?"

[...]

"The religious discourse generates a crisis. You go to a mosque, listen to the Friday prayer, and you return a bundle of nerves, feeling hostile toward civilization and society, because the sermons focus on the negative aspects of society, and inflate them."

Interviewer: "So what needs to be done?"

Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: "We need to focus on the beautiful aspects of life and society. Not everything in life is tragic. You should make people love life. I would like the religious scholars, through their religious discourse, to make our youth love life, and not death."

On Qaradhawi:

...Interviewer: "So if Yusra was sitting next to you, you would take a nap?"

Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: "At least I’d feel free. I said that this does not diminish the respect I feel for Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi, even though I disagree with him on certain political and ideological issues. Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi supports the view that the West is our enemy, that America is an enemy, and that we should place a ban on... I don’t agree. This does not serve our interests. I have said so in all my articles. For example, he said that dialogue with the Jews should only take place by means of human bombs. I object to this. I support dialogue even with the Jews, even with the enemy. The Prophet conducted a dialogue with his most bitter enemies. How can one say that dialogue should be conducted by means of human bombs?"

Interviewer: "But Yusra has a negative attitude towards the Jews too."

Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: "Holding a negative view is one thing, and encouraging my children to turn into bombs is another. I criticize Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi for his support of the conspiracy theory whereby the entire world is conspiring against us. I criticize him for his claim that the West and America are enemies, and that we should ban them. When he organized a campaign to ban American products, I disagreed with him."


The Imam and the Ultimate Insider

Miss Kelly continues her bang-up research on the goings-on inside the Islamic Society of Boston and related groups. First, here two-parter on ISB Imam Basyouny Nehela: Part 1, Part 2.

Second, she has a "document dump" worth of stuff showing the activities of "ultimate insider," Muhammad Ali-Salaam: ISB and BRA's Muhammad Ali-Salaam - Slight Conflict of Interest?

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Two More on Nadia

At PhDiva: Nadia Abu El Haj and the Use of Evidence

...Abu El Haj attributes extraordinary powers of creativity to the archaeological profession. Archaeologists have “created the fact of an ancient Israelite/Jewish nation,” where none actually existed, all those city walls and bullae with impressions written in paleo-Hebrew are “pure political fabrication.”...

...The archaeology of ancient Israel is hotly contested terrain, with pitched battles currently raging over such issues as whether a centralized Israelite kingdom emerges in the tenth century or the ninth, and weather or not Eilat Mazar has uncovered a tenth-century royal Judean building. I am not, however, aware of a single archaeologist or historian who would support Abu El Haj’s contention that the Israelite kingdoms are mere fiction constructs, the Jewish “nation’s origin myth,” comparable, that is, to the Aeneid, or the founding of Japan by the sun goddess.

This sort of silliness would ordinarily be dismissed as mere crank writing – heaven knows no academic discipline is subject to a greater output of crank scholarship than archaeology – except for the fact that this book is published by the University of Chicago Press and based on a PhD dissertation accepted by Duke University. We are forced to conclude that theories historians and archaeologists regard as daft are actually seen as plausible by at least some anthropologists.

Amusingly, Abu El Haj is something of a positivist when it comes to the myths of Palestinian nationhood. All Israelis are part of a definitionally illegitimate “settler colonial society;” strident nationalism drives Israelis to commit every kind of crime including the destruction of non-Jewish artifacts; this contrasts with the ethical archaeological stewardship displayed by Palestinians, especially the Waqf, held up here as the embodiment of best practice; and when Palestinians do deliberately venerable sites - “looting (Joseph’s Tomb) and setting it alight” – their actions are to be “understood” and excused...

ArchaeoBlog picks up the bulldozer business:

...I think I mentioned in previous posts on this that large earth-moving equipment is not unknown archaeologically, though not often used for obvious reasons. It could feasibly start an urban legend of heinous archaeologists ripping up valuable archaeological remains. But, you know, that's the danger when you throw out "I heard from someone that. . . ." as part of an academic treatise.

Did Andover Get Bad Legal Advice?

You'll all remember the saga (still ongoing, though quietly) involving Andover High School (aka Hamas High), Hamas's own, physics teacher Ron Francis, and union head Tommy "the Commie" Meyers -- here's video of the Superintendent apologizing for the incident.

This article in the San Francisco Chronicle about what sounds like a highly analogous situation certainly makes it sound as though the School Committee got some bad legal advice in backing down so easily: 'Honk for peace' case tests limits on free speech

When one of Deborah Mayer's elementary school students asked her on the eve of the Iraq war whether she would ever take part in a peace march, the veteran teacher recalls answering, "I honk for peace."

Soon afterward, Mayer lost her job and her home in Indiana. She was out of work for nearly three years. And when she complained to federal courts that her free-speech rights had been violated, the courts replied, essentially, that as a public school teacher she didn't have any.

As a federal appeals court in Chicago put it in January, a teacher's speech is "the commodity she sells to an employer in exchange for her salary." The Bloomington, Ind., school district had just as much right to fire Mayer, the court said, as it would have if she were a creationist who refused to teach evolution.

The ruling was legally significant. Eight months earlier, the U.S. Supreme Court had decided in a case involving the Los Angeles district attorney's office that government employees were not protected by the First Amendment when they faced discipline for speaking at work about controversies related to their jobs. The Chicago appeals court was the first to apply the same rationale to the classroom, an issue that the Supreme Court expressly left unresolved.

But legal analysts said the Mayer ruling was probably less important as a precedent than as a stark reminder that the law provides little protection for schoolteachers who express their beliefs.

As far as the courts are concerned, "public education is inherently a situation where the government is the speaker, and ... its employees are the mouthpieces of the government," said Vikram Amar, a professor at UC's Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. Whatever academic freedom exists for college teachers is "much, much less" in public schools, he said...

...The Mayer ruling was disappointing but not surprising, said Michael Simpson, assistant general counsel of the National Education Association, the nation's largest teachers' union. For the last decade, he said, federal courts "have not been receptive to arguments that teachers, both K-12 and higher education, have free-speech rights in the classroom."...

..."Teachers bring their creativity, their energy, their skill in teaching the curriculum, but ... a teacher in K-12 is really not at liberty to design a curriculum," said Negrón, who filed arguments with the court in Mayer's case supporting the Bloomington school district. "That's the function of the school board."...

..."Teachers hire out their own speech and must provide the service for which employers are willing to pay," a three-judge panel of the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Jan. 24. "The Constitution does not entitle teachers to present personal views to captive audiences against the instructions of elected officials."

Mayer, the court said, was told by her bosses that she could teach about the war "as long as she kept her opinions to herself." Like the Los Angeles district attorney's employee whose demotion led to the Supreme Court's 2006 ruling, the appellate panel said, Mayer had no constitutional right to say anything on the job that conflicted with her employer's policy...

Amazing how many of these issues came up during the Andover situation, yet for some reason, with the help of the Mass Teachers Association and the ACLU, things came to a diametrically opposite conclusion.

Defending John Doe

Michelle Malkin has info on the latest efforts:

Congressmen Stevan Pearce, along with Rep. Peter King and Rep. Bill Shuster, introduced a bill today that would protect those who come forward to report suspicious activity from frivolous civil liability prosecution.

If passed, the bill, known commonly as the 'John Doe' protection legislation, would grant immunity to anyone who alerted transportation security to actions believed to be threatening or to any personnel that "takes reasonable action to mitigate such activity."

"We cannot have Americans thinking twice when it comes matters of national security," said Congressman Pearce. "If a passenger sees something threatening, they should report it immediately and do so without the specter of potential prosecution hanging over their head."

"Alert Americans are often our first and last line of defense in protecting the country from terrorist attacks. They should not face potential prosecution for doing the right thing and coming forward to report suspicious activity.

"It is a sad commentary that this kind of common sense has to be written into law, but we must make it clear to America's enemies that they can not exploit our system of justice."...

The Washington Times editorializes that we ought to be watching who's for this effort, and who's agin' it:

We've all seen this phrase in block letters: "REPORT SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY," followed by a 1-800 number. But if a House Democrat manages to kill a tipster-immunity measure under consideration in Congress this month, people who report suspicious behavior could be sued in civil court if the accused are not charged with a crime. November's frightened U.S. Airways "John Doe" passengers in Minneapolis are already in the crosshairs.

The lawmaker in question is Bennie Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. He thinks that granting tipsters immunity amounts to racial and religious profiling. Yes, that's the Democrats' "homeland security" pointman in the House speaking.

For two months, Mr. Thompson has deployed the profiling argument against this measure, tucked into the House transportation-security bill. The good news is that a bipartisan House majority already passed it 304-121 seven weeks ago. But sadly, Mr. Thompson is expected to strip it from the bill. He is expected to be the lead House negotiator in the coming weeks when the bill reaches conference committee, and if he is, he will have considerable sway over the final product...

Of course, we in Boston have had our own "John Doe's" in the crosshairs for years now, fighting a lawsuit against the Islamic Society of Boston. I have written a major piece for Pajamas Media on this subject in which I hope to introduce an even larger number of people to the victims of this kind of legal silencing. The essay should be appearing tomorrow. Stay tuned.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Another Rumored French FM Pick

Is this guy a little better than the other one? Humanitarian likely French FM

BERNARD Kouchner, a world-renowned humanitarian who founded the Doctors with Borders (MSF) charity and served as the UN's representative in Kosovo, is likely to be France's next foreign minister, aides to president-elect Nicolas Sarkozy said overnight.

The 67-year-old, a member of the opposition Socialist Party, was approached by Mr Sarkozy over the last few days and "is ready to enter the government", they said.

According to Le Monde newspaper, he was to see Mr Sarkozy overnight for talks based on a future minister's range of responsibilities...

...Mr Kouchner is famous for developing the theory of "humanitarian intervention" to justify international action against dictators who flout human rights.

In the run-up to the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, he was strongly critical of French policy which he said had encouraged the US and Britain to go to war without UN backing.


Values

Michael Yon with a message from General Patraeus: Values Message

Yon:

...There is great stress in combat, and this particular type of combat can be very frustrating. Stress in combat increases the potential for something bad to happen. Strong commanders are the only thing standing between us and another Abu Grahaib or Haditha. If something like that were to happen now, it would be a terrible setback in a war that we can still win. I am in Fallujah now, and those who have closely followed the war will need little reminder about what happened here in April 2004, and how our reprisal to barbarism caused an esclation in the war. (Fallujah is much quieter these days, and there has been great progress in the Anbar region. Enough progress to actually get media coverage.)

The progress is very real. But the potential for a disaster is also real. During the last mission I went on with the Brits, we lost two soldiers to IEDs. There were civilians around who clearly knew what happened: 48 IEDs had been put out for us and killed the guys that came behind the vehicle I was riding in. (The enemy let us pass, then hit a convoy.) The potential was there for reprisal, but the British leadership was strong and the soldiers were very professional...

Patraeus:

...Our values and the laws governing warfare teach us to respect human dignity, maintain our integrity, and do what is right. Adherence to our values distinguishes us from our enemy. This fight depends on securing the population, which must understand that we—not our enemies—occupy the moral high ground. This strategy has shown results in recent months. Al Qaeda’s indiscriminate attacks, for example, have finally started to turn a substantial proportion ofthe Iraqi population against it.

In view of this, I was concerned by the results of a recently released survey conducted last fall in Iraq that revealed an apparent unwillingness on the part of some US personnel to report illegal actions taken by fellow members of their units. The study also indicated that a small percentage of those surveyed may have mistreated noncombatants. This survey should spur reflection on our conduct in combat...

Update: On the other hand, there's the stuff neo is musing over, here.

Saudi Marriage Councilor

Voices in the Wilderness

This guy is good (video at the link):

memriliberal.jpg

MEMRI TV: Syrian Liberal Author Nidhal Naisa Speaks Out against Suicide Operations in a Debate on the State of Arab Youth

..."The pan-Arab movements that have taken over the Arab nation forced a certain ideology upon the Arab citizens, upon the Arab youth, and they follow this ideology like sheep. When the youth encountered globalization, they found themselves new breathing space. The Arab youth runs away from confronting [reality]. They run away to the virtual worlds of reality TV and the Internet."...

..."Don't you feel ashamed that out of the 500 leading universities worldwide, there isn't a single Arab university? What are you people doing about this? Among the 500 leading universities in the world, there is no Arab university, no Arab institute."...

..."These are not universities. In the words of my friend Faysal, these are taming cages, corrals in which you confine people and teach them some slogans, and they clap their hands, and that's it."...

...Faysal Al-Qassem, host: "Isn't it unfair to describe the distinguished Arab universities as cages, pounds, and corrals?"

Nidhal Naisa: "What have they produced, Faysal? Have they produced a bomb with which to fight those 'infidels' and 'Crusaders'?"

Faysal Al-Qassem: "You mean in inverted commas..."

Nidhal Naisa: "Of course. Have you produced anything? What have you produced? Even an aspirin pill you import from the West, to this day. Even bread and medicine you import. What have you been doing at these universities? This indicates that these universities are not centers of production, but cages and corrals." [...]

Faysal Al-Qassem: "Is it conceivable to say that the Arab environment is a terrorist environment?"

Nidhal Naisa: "Of course. If these people had been brought up in an environment supporting human rights and love for the 'other,' an environment that glorifies love and brotherhood, rather than killing, we wouldn't be seeing these... People have turned into time bombs. Why? Because the horizons of these people are blocked."...

..."Dr. Faysal, the ruling authorities, the current dictatorships, have a monopoly on power, on politics, on natural resources, and on everything. There are no sports clubs, no Internet cafes, or places people can go to. There is nothing but hell on earth, so a person goes and throws himself in this hell. If there was a proper sports club where he could release his youthful energy, he wouldn't go to Afghanistan, brother. It is the nature of human beings to love life, but the blocked horizons, the persecution, the oppression, and the exploitation turn a human being into a time bomb, and make him blow himself up [in order to kill] the 'other.' The culture of hostility towards the 'other' is what has caused this."...

Sarkozy's FM Pick: More of the Same

Though it's not official yet, it doesn't necessarily sound good: Israel shocked by Sarkozy's pick for FM

Jerusalem was both "shocked" and "disappointed" by French President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy's reported selection of Socialist Hubert Vedrine as his foreign minister over the weekend.

Vedrine is a well-known and not-much-beloved personage in Jerusalem, having served as foreign minister under prime minister Lionel Jospin from 1997-2002.

During the height of the Palestinian violence that began in September 2000, Vedrine advocated economic sanctions against Israel within the EU...

...in a January interview with the pan-Arab Al-Hayat newspaper, Vedrine said that "Palestinians... endure misfortune and utter chaos, viewed as the outcome of a policy suggested by the US and Israeli right-wing parties."

While Sarkozy has repeatedly said that he would not legitimize Hamas or Hizbullah by entering into dialogue with them, and that the Iranian threat must be met with unity and firmness by European leaders, Vedrine voiced another approach.

"With respect to France, I always call for keeping dialogue channels open with Iran, Syria, Hizbullah and Hamas. I would not be the least be stunned should France follow this path," he said. ..

[via Bald Headed Geek]

One Rat to Rule Them All

Hamas Mickey lives, preaching the goodness of Islamic Supremacy and the wickedness of independent Jews and Christians.

First, the Jews ate my homework:

Hamas Mouse: Blame the Jews

The Mickey Mouse clone named Farfur who’s been preaching hatred and Islamic domination to Palestinian kids was back on the air and blaming the Jews for his woes on Friday, despite public statements by Palestinian Authority Minister of Information Mustafa Barghouti that the show would be taken off the Hamas TV network until it could be reviewed.

Farfur, star of the Al Aqsa TV children’s show Tomorrow’s Pioneers, was joined on the broadcast by his regular co-host, a little girl named Saraa. The program also featured an adult, Hazim, who delivered most of the show’s messages about Islamic supremacy...

Hazem: "Why did you cheat?"

Farfur: "It was against my will, uncle Hazem, because the Jews destroyed our home, and when the Jews destroyed our home I couldn’t find my notebooks."

Hazem: "By Allah's will, we will promote through Islam good, love and justice. Ask history, and ask the Jews, did they ever live in a time period better than the one they live under Islam. And ask the Christians how their security was assured in the churches and monasteries...Once we were! Do you remember Andalus [Spain and Portugal]? This dear Andalus will return one day.

Sara: We remind you dear kids, that the glory and the civilization of the [Islamic] nation, you shall restore!

Farfur's creator is staying on message (not online yet): Hamas Mickey Mouse creator: Islamic rule will benefit Christians and Jews

The force behind Hamas TV’s controversial Mickey Mouse clone said today that his children’s television program will continue to promote worldwide Islamic supremacy, for everyone's benefit, including Christians and Jews.

In a long interview on Hamas TV, Hazim Al-Sha’arawi, Deputy Director of Al-Aqsa TV and one of the creators of the Hamas children’s TV show Tomorrow’s Pioneers, said that using the program to promote Islamic rule over other religions is actually promoting “justice, goodness and world love.”...

Al-Sha’arawi said in yesterday’s interview that he wants to raise Palestinian children so that they can achieve "Islam's natural place" of world rule – in essence saying that although the Christians and Jews do not understand this yet, Islamic world rule is really best for them as well.

From interview of Hazem Al-Sha’arawi, Deputy Director of Al-Aqsa [Hamas] TV:

"What is being asked, so that the Americans and Zionists will be satisfied with you, is to follow their lead … We [on this program] have a message, and we understood from the beginning that it is a difficult path... But we were sure that we had to go this way, because this [young] generation needs someone to direct it …and this generation is the most worthy of the position of leadership…

Let’s ask history: …which time period was good to all communities? The Jews lived in the time of Islam [under Islamic rule] and were happy. The Christians lived in the time of Islam [under Islamic rule] and were happy. Look at the history, the prophet [Muhammad]… ordered the army: ‘Do not kill a monk in his prayer room.’ Even the Caliph Umar Bin Al-Khattab, [Islamic conqueror of Jerusalem in 638] when he came into the Al-Aqsa Mosque, he secured the churches and the prayer rooms. Therefore, when we talk [on the program] about the mission of the restoration of Islam to its natural place [of world rule], we [are] calling for justice, and for goodness, and for world love… so that the Christians will live in peace, and that even the Jews will live in peace and security.”

"Even" the Jews? Why that's mighty white 'a him.

PA official disputes King Herod's tomb discovery claim

That didn't take long (I'm a little late in posting this). Nadia's people are upset about the Herod's tomb stuff: PA official disputes King Herod's tomb discovery claim

...But the Palestinian Authority Tourism Ministry said there was not enough evidence to support the archeologist's claim.

"There's nothing unusual about the latest discovery, which is no different from previous ones," a senior official in the ministry said.

The official claimed that the discovery was lacking in "scientific credibility" and showed that there were ideological motives behind the dramatic announcement earlier this week...

I'm sure he spent a great deal of time examining the evidence. Not to worry, though, his concerns are purely scientific:

...According to the official, archeological sites in the West Bank belong only to the Palestinians and are part of their cultural, historical and spiritual heritage. He said Israeli excavation work in the West Bank was being carried out in violation of international laws...

Hopefully they've got armed guards.

[h/t: Zvi]

Truman and the birth of Israel

Wonderful and informative excerpt:

...In April 1945, as Harry Truman became president and Allied soldiers liberated the death camps of Europe, Americans were learning about the terrible reach of the Holocaust. For many American Jews, the Holocaust showed that they must never again depend on the kindness of strangers: only a Jewish state could protect their people from another Hitler. They feared that the small-town Missouri Baptist in the White House could not possibly understand their predicament. They did not know that Truman had grown up knowing Jews or that he had studied their history since boyhood.

For two years in Independence, a Jewish family called the Viners lived next door to Truman's family. As Sarah Viner much later recalled, her brother Abe was "very close friends" with the future president: "Harry was always over at our house ... I think this was his first contact with Jewish people." On the Sabbath, when observant Jews could not do household chores, Harry served as the Viners' "Shabbos goy."

While a 16-year-old student at Independence High School, young Truman was assigned to write about Shylock, Shakespeare's Jewish villain in "The Merchant of Venice," in an essay discovered in 2000. Given vast potential for indulging in anti-Semitism when writing of Shylock, Truman viewed the Jewish people with unexpected sympathy: "We cannot blame Shylock for getting money as a means for revenge upon those who persecuted him. He was not a miser, and if one of his own nation had been in trouble, he would have helped him as quickly as a Christian would help a Christian ... I never saw Jew, Christian or any other man who, if he had the chance, wouldn't take revenge."

Truman went on to insist that no one "except the Hebrews" had "ruled" the world, then "when they fell," remained "a distinct people." He wrote that after 2,000 years, the Jews were "a nation apart from nations ... persecuted for their religion," still "waiting for a leader" to gather their "scattered people."...

It's a long piece, worth checking out.

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Happy Mother's Day

I've got a busy one. Gotta mow the lawn, give the kid a bath, go to a dance recital, go to dinner (whole family -- stress)...not my idea of the ideal day.

Have a lovely day.

Unusual Deaths

The Greek playwright Aeschylus was killed when an eagle dropped a live tortoise on him, mistaking his bald head for a stone.

The poet and grammarian Philetas of Cos reportedly wasted away and died of insomnia while brooding about the Liar paradox.

George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence reportedly was executed by drowning in a barrel of Malmsey wine[9] at his own request.

Tailor Franz Reichelt fell to his death off the first deck of the Eiffel Tower while testing his invention, the coat parachute. It was his first ever attempt with the parachute and he'd told the authorities in advance he would test it first with a dummy.

Many more.

Applied Geometry

Sandstorm in the Negev

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Siniora on the Stump

The Governor of the Syrian province known as "Lebanon" had an op-ed in yesterday's New York Times: Give the Arab Peace Initiative a Chance

Siniora plays the victim card well, and in his personal case it's almost true, since his level of agency in the country's destiny seems weak, but pity is a bit fleeting while reading him trying to portray Lebanon as merely the victim of Israeli warmongering. While trying to sell the Saudi "peace" plan, he studiously avoids any mention of the word "Hizballah," which is necessary when painting the picture he tries to paint.

Here's a clue -- if you're so put out by the plight of the "Palestinians," how about letting them work, build, become Lebanese citizens and move on from their fantasies? I can understand, however, why the Lebanese wouldn't want to be stuck with a mass of people reared on what the Arabs in those camps have been reared on for the past six decades. I'd be looking to find an exit for them, too.

They'll have to make due with what's left of a-historic "Palestine," however -- something they could have had by now if it hadn't been for those who remain unnamed in Siniora's piece -- Hamas, PLO, Hizballah, Syria, Iran, etc., etc....

[h/t: Sophia]

Airman Missing In Action From WWII is Identified

DoD:

...On July 22, 1944, [1st Lt. Archibald] Kelly was the navigator on a B-24J Liberator on a bombing raid of the oil fields at Ploesti, Romania. Returning to Lecce air base in Italy, the plane was struck by enemy anti-aircraft fire and crashed in what is now Croatia, approximately 430 miles southwest of Ploesti. Of the ten crewmen on board, eight survived and bailed out of the aircraft before it crashed. The rear gunner died and his body was later recovered. One of the surviving crewmen saw Kelly bail out before the crash, but said he struck a rocky cliff face when the wind caught his parachute. His body was not found at that time.

After researching information contained in U.S. wartime records, specialists from DPMO’s Joint Commission Support Directorate (JCSD) in 2005 interviewed residents from Dubrovnik and Mihanici village who had information related to WWII aircraft losses in the area. One resident recalled a crash in which one of the crewmen landed on a pile of rocks on Mt. Snijeznica after his parachute failed to open. He said locals buried the individual. Based on witness descriptions of the burial location, the team searched the mountaintop, but was unable to locate the burial site.

Additional JCSD archival research in Croatia confirmed the earlier information found in U.S. records. In June 2006, the Dubrovnik resident reported to JCSD that he had continued the search and found the grave site of the American serviceman. He sent pictures of both the site and the remains to DPMO. In September 2006, a Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC) team excavated the burial site, confirming with local villagers that it was the same site photographed by the Dubrovnik resident. The team recovered human remains at the site...


More Self-Assured Times

Friday, May 11, 2007

Mothers and Peace

Queen Noor of Jordan says this Mother's Day that:

...the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East still reflects some of the most pressing global challenges confronting the contemporary world -- the stagnant Palestinian/Israeli peace process, the increasingly dangerous conflict in Iraq, the escalation of extremism, the debate over emerging democracies -- all point to the need for visionary and transformative leadership. I firmly believe that peace will only come to the region when mothers find their voice and say of the violence, "Enough is enough!"...

Could be. That would mean excluding mothers like Umm Nidal Farhat, the mother of Wafa al-Biss (Bas), or Reem Riyashi.

Immigration Imams: Deportation Hearing Delays

Miss Kelly has a lengthy must-read for those following the case of Massachusetts' Immigration Imams. The hearing for Imam Masood has been delayed for five months, and there's a lot of other interesting stuff, here.

Au Revoir Salah Soltan?

Writing in Frontpage, Patrick Poole has some very positive news about the citizenship prospects of radical Ohio Imam, Salah Soltan: Hometown Jihad: The Hamas Connection. Soltan has not exactly been laying low:

Last July, an estimated three hundred thousand supporters of the radical Islamic Turkish Saadet Party gathered in Istanbul to rally in support of the Palestinian terrorist organization HAMAS and their kidnapping of an Israeli soldier. Among the keynote speakers at the rally were HAMAS terrorist-in-chief Ismail Haniyeh (speaking via videophone), former Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan (political mentor to Saadet Party leaders), and my own Hilliard, Ohio neighbor, Salah Sultan.

Sultan, president of the Columbus, Ohio-based American Center for Islamic Research and protégé of Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Youssef Al-Qaradawi (described by the Anti-Defamation League as the “Theologian of Terror” and designated by the US Government as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist), whipped up the crowd by condemning the Israeli response to the HAMAS kidnappings and calling for a boycott of Israel, as reported by Qaradawi’s own mouthpiece, Islamonline.net...

According to Poole's sources:

“With the information that we have in hand, Sultan’s application is essentially a dead letter, especially now that we know about this HAMAS rally. You would think that with all the attention that he’s been getting this past year, he would be smart enough to lay low long enough to get through the process to get his citizenship. He probably thought that he could get away with some of these activities because he was doing most of it overseas… His concern now shouldn’t just be about becoming a US citizen, but if his overall immigration status is going to get reviewed. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if they pull his Green Card and he gets deported."

[Tip 'o the ten-gallon to Miss Kelly]

Thursday, May 10, 2007

While we're on the subject of the Khazarian Zionist Bolsheviks

And we were...sorta...Steven Plaut has a good one on the Jews as Khazars nonsense -- disturbing nonsense I should say, for as Plaut puts it:

...the popularity of the Khazar myth among anti-Semites represents a return of modern anti-Jewish bigotry to the racialism of the 1930’s and earlier.

Nearly every anti-Semitic and neo-Nazi website denounces Zionists and Israelis as "Khazars." Web chat lists in which Jews defending Israel are dismissed as "Khazar usurpers" are too numerous to count.

The racialism once again in vogue holds that Jews would only have legitimate claims to the right of self-determination in their homeland if they were appropriately Semitic from a racial point of view. Palestine is part of the Semitic racial lebensraum and those who do not possess the correct pure racial markings have no business being there. Racial purity is suddenly the new basis for national rights...

Here's the piece: The Khazar Myth and the New Anti-Semitism

...The newly fashionable Khazar mythology holds that modern day Ashkenazim, and especially the European leadership of the Zionist movement, are not Jews at all in the racial sense, but rather descendents from non-Jewish Khazars; therefore, the Khazar "theorists" claim, Zionists and Israelis have no legitimate claims to the Land of Israel.

It would be hard to exaggerate how widespread the misuse of the Khazar myth is among those seeking to delegitimize Israel and Jews today. A recent investigation showed nearly 30,000 websites using the Khazar "theory" as a bludgeon against Israel and Zionism.

Some two hundred websites claim to describe a cabal known as the Khazarian Zionist Bolsheviks (KZV). Neo-Nazi and Holocaust denial organizations and websites are particularly fond of the Khazar myth. It is also growing in popularity among left-wing anti-Zionists...

The rest is here, with thanks to ZionistYoungster.

The On-Again, Off-Again Hamas Rat

Both Palestinian Media Watch and MEMRI have issued releases involving the now infamous Hamas Micky Mouse clone, Farfur. Production values have come a long way in the past few years. Remember Tarabisho?

Use of an iconic American children's character prompted wide-spread media interest for once, even if some of it, such as in this CNN report, simply gave fodder for the usual MSM middle of the road moral equivalence idiocy.

A PMW email today qvelled that as a result of all the attention -- and it listed much of it -- Hamas had agreed to take Farfur off the air. (The report doesn't seem to be online at this time.)

As it turns out, reports of Farfur's demise appear to have been greatly exaggerated.

No one gets between Hamas and child indoctrination to martyrdom and Islamic supremacism, after all.

But a minor controversy surrounding MEMRI's translation has clouded the issue, and that's unfortunate. Here's video of Glenn Beck talking with the head of MEMRI about it. Frankly, I had already looked into the translation issue, and I'll have to be honest, that video of Beck smacks of more than a little obfuscation if you must know. Just because all those bureaus had cleared the video doesn't necessarily mean they looked into detail at the translation.

You see, I had already asked my friend, Arabic instructor and native (I believe) Arabic speaker, Franck Salameh, for his take on the video. Just for the record, from what I know of Franck's politics, he makes me look like a raving liberal. With his permission, here's the reply I got:

Sol, I would hate to contradict MEMRI on this one. I have a great admiration for their work, but CNN is spot on on this.. but not without a caveat or two:

1- structures and semantics: "Yatukkhuna l-Yahuud" is syntactically MSA [Modern Standard Arabic -- "literary Arabic" -S] but semantically Palestinian vernacular par excellence; the verb "yatukh" (to kill) is used almost exclusively by Palestinians to connote the MSA "Yaqtul" (to kill). In any case, whichever way the sentence is translated, the verb "yatukh" means "to kill", NOT "to annihilate". Now, in terms of diction, you can use this one sentence "Yatukhkhuuna l-Yahuud" and mean both "the Jews are killing us" and "they are killing the Jews." But, more important than that is the context: the vermin is definitely inciting hatred and violence against the Jews; s/he exudes this sort venom not only semantically but also in terms of intonation and voice pitch; I'm sure a forensic linguist would spot that out without much effort. We mustn't get hung up on this one sentence; the larger picture is much more frightening than "the Jews are killing us" or "they are killing the Jews." The "beauty" of the Palestinians' "Principles of Hatred" is that they are being normalized and internalized by way of a seemingly anodyne Disney knock off.


2- the show not only promotes "Muslim supremacy" but also "MSA imperialism". It addresses young viewers in (and coaxes them to use) MSA rather than their spoken dialects. This not only infuses the young with the language of Koran, but probably also creates a barrier between toddlers and pre-schoolers (who naturally speak their parents' language, i.e. the dialects, NOT MSA), and their parents whom I suspect are largely illiterate in the rigors of MSA and, consequently, unable to challenge the venom spewed in it on the airwaves (because they lack understanding of its language and are unable to limit their children's exposure to it.)

I hope i haven't complicated things further.

I love MEMRI, they do hugely important work we all can rely on (and I love Glenn Beck), but I think they weren't careful enough with this one. Even if they get something wrong, the facts are easy enough to check and it's a service just to bring the material out. In all the thousands of translations they do, it's no shame to be off once in awhile, but that was the most effective line in the piece -- heck, it's the one I chose for the screenshot on my post -- and that calls for extra care in my opinion. There's plenty of outrageous stuff out there (and in the rest of the Farfur piece as Franck points out) without ever having to reach for anything and risk confusing the issue with tangents. I hate to spend even this much time on it, but I feel an obligation to my readers to be as honest in what I put up here as possible. It may sound corny, but if I'm angry and outraged, I want you to know that those are honest emotions based on honest facts and interpretations.

Again, does it change anything about Hamas's genocide rat? Not at all.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Nadia's Next Effort: Jewish Racists

I've remarked before about various anti-Semitic commentators who seem to engage in a degree of racist projection -- accusing Israelis and Jews of being racist while appearing to obsess over Jewish genetic origins themselves. Is Columbia's Nadia Abu El-Haj about to embark on an endeavor to give academic veneer to the "Jews as Nazis" slander? It sounds like it. This is disturbing. Here are a few snips from Paula Stern's Nadia's Future Work?

As disturbing as Nadia El Haj's past work is, her future "research" seems to be even more chilling.

Nadia Abu El Haj, has announced her intention to write what her colleague Joseph Massad describes as “a book about the "Zionist movement('s)…desperate contemporary search for Jewish 'genetic markers' " to support "its continued investment in the racial separateness of the Jews." Following are some details about Nadia's use – and misuse – of genetic research by nationalists...

...Someone recently attended a Brown Bag luncheon last spring to hear Abu El Haj speak on “Jews and Arabs: The Shifting Boundaries of Kinship and Difference.” What this person heard was simply chilling...

...She chose to focus on what she called the “Jewish Racial Science” as practiced by Jewish physicians in Mandatory Palestine. Eugenics was fashionable and more than respectable in that era. Today, we look back with horror at a time when respectable people advocated selective breeding and Justices of the United States Supreme Court now recalled with the greatest respect for other decisions they signed, endorsed forced sterilization of the genetically inferior...

...She gave descriptions of these Jewish physicians that made them sound like Joseph Mengele, although the Nazi scientists were not actually discussed, and these eugenist physicians did not sterilize anyone – they merely talked, mostly about who should breed and who should not. No context of the international eugenics movement was discussed, only what was made to appear as the appalling racialism of the Jewish professional class in Mandatory Palestine. The vile racialism and eugenic proposals of that group were alone held up for revulsion. During the discussion period, all questioners appeared to accept that early twentieth century Jewish racial science was a unique phenomenon...


Herod Photos

MAS Watch: With Friends Like These...

Today on the moderated Muslim American Society/Islamic Society of Boston email list, a "press release" regarding material uncovered through the ISB's spray of subpoenas. The press release is the same as this Indymedia thread: Damning Evidence Against the David Project and was distributed by...Karin Friedemann...one half of the Martillo ("suicide attacks against Israel are completely justifiable")/Friedmann wedded team (see this post for a little background) of classical anti-semites. In fact, outside ISB spokesperson Jessica Masse and attorney Howard Cooper, this pair has been providing the most outspoken public face on behalf of the ISB's lawsuits. It would be difficult to find a more effective method of justifying concerns with this group short of perhaps trotting out Sheik Qaradawi or Walid ("[the Jews] have incurred Allah's wrath and they have been afflicted with misery") Fitaihi as spokespeople again.

You can read the disclosed emails in the Indymedia piece. The trouble for the ISB is they're indistinguishable from the private discussions of a group of people who recognize a threat and begin to discuss among themselves what to do about it -- something the ISB's lawsuit is attempting to criminalize.

Update: CAIR has linked to Friedemann's piece in their latest broadcast email. Nice.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

'The Wahhabis are up to no good in southern Europe'

More on the Wahhabis in the Balkans (previous) by Stephen Schwartz, himself a Sufi: The Balkan Front - The Wahhabis are up to no good in southern Europe. Schwartz has been covering this phenomenon for some time.

...In 2002, however, in the aftermath of Slav-Albanian ethnic fighting, a group of Wahhabis including Arabs, equipped with automatic weapons, seized a major building inside the Harabati complex, formerly used for Sufi meditation.

I visited the Harabati Tekke in March for the Central Asian pre-Islamic holiday of Nevruz, a springtime observance that is favored by Sufis. Because the Bektashis have no friends in the Macedonian government who might rescue them from their tormenters, the Wahhabis, whose Kalashnikovs are never far out of sight, have proceeded to occupy more structures in the Harabati Tekke. Bektashis do not perform the normal daily prayers prescribed for Muslims, but the Wahhabis do, and they have taken over a guest house and dubbed it a mosque, broadcasting a tape of the call to prayer in a thick and indistinct voice. They have also seized a central building with glass windows and covered the panes with black paper, on the pretext that women praying inside do not want to be observed. And they have cut down some ancient trees, to the Sufis' disgust.

Thus, the Albanian lands are witnessing three of the tactics commonly employed by Saudi-financed radicals seeking to export bloody terror. In Kosovo, they mainly burrow deep undercover, like moles. Where they can, as in Albania, they preach and recruit; thus, the stunning Ethem Bey mosque in the capital, Tirana, purely a cultural monument until recently, is now the scene of Wahhabi missionizing. And where government is indifferent and the extremists' chosen enemies appear vulnerable, as in Macedonia, they invade, occupy, and threaten.

In long discussions with the Bektashis in Tetovo, I was repeatedly assured of their willingness to assist the United States and other democratic nations in rooting out Islamist radicalism in any way they can, from providing intelligence to encouraging greater Albanian involvement in Iraq, where 120 elite noncombat Albanian troops are serving with Coalition forces...


Iranian Weapons. American Lives.

Bulldozer Archaeology

Two Nadia Abu El-Haj posts in a single day. Found this review by an academic whose primary concern seems to be the misuse of bulldozer imagery, which actually becomes a rather effective critique. Interesting. Ralph Harrington: Bulldozer archaeology? Excavation, earthmoving and archaeological practice in Israel

It concludes [emphasis mine]:

...In general non-technical discourse the term ‘bulldozer’ is frequently applied in a loose way to a wide range of earthmoving vehicles, whether they are tracked or wheeled, are equipped with blade or bucket, or are designed for excavation or for grading; and to place such emphasis on the distinction between the bulldozer and the JCB may seem to belong to the realm of the trainspotter rather than the scholar. The fact is, however, that in this context the distinction between the two types of machine is important, and it is not unreasonable to expect a serious scholar to acquaint herself with that distinction and use the correct term in a responsible way, particularly as she is attaching such weight to the point she is trying to make with her account of Israeli ‘bulldozer archaeology’. Equally, however, it is true that her point is given added emphasis by her use of the word ‘bulldozer’, a word which is heavily laden with symbolic significance, particularly in the context of Israel/Palestine. It makes for a much more memorable and effective denunciation of Israeli archaeology to accuse excavators of using bulldozers – conjuring up images of 60-ton steel behemoths with colossal blades grinding Palestine’s heritage beneath their tracks – than to report that they used a JCB to dig trenches and remove topsoil, like archaeologists the world over.

Nadia Abu El-Haj’s distorted picture of Israeli archaeological practice is not simply a matter of confusion over technical terms, but a conscious strategy of ideologically-motivated misrepresentation. The essential point is that Abu El-Haj’s target is not Israeli archaeology at all, but the existence of Israel itself. She describes the main purpose of her book as ‘analyz[ing] the significance of archaeology to the Israeli state and society and the role it played in the formation and enactment of its colonial-national historical imagination and in the substantiation of its territorial claims’, and exploring the contribution of archaeology to shaping ‘the contours of the so-called “new Hebrew” nation and citizenry’ in Palestine.[22] Israel, for Abu El-Haj, is an invention, an artificial colonial enterprise driven by an ideology, Zionism, within which colonialism and nationalism are intrinsically linked. Facts on the Ground is devoted to her argument that the nationalist archaeological tradition of the Jewish State since 1948 has played a fundamental role in inventing and sustaining the interrelated fictions of ancient and modern Israel. It is as a symbolic epitome of that claim, rather than for itself, that her notion of ‘bulldozer archaeology’ is important to her argument; and on those grounds the archaeological bulldozers of her imagination must be dismissed as an ideologically-driven fiction themselves.


Nuclear Explosion

More Child Abuse and Islamic Supremacism with Hamas's Rat

memrihamasrat.jpg

Oh wow. Here's more "Farfur," taking calls from kids with his young child host, making martyrs to commit and go to slaughter.

MEMRI TV: A Mickey Mouse Character on Hamas TV Teaches Children about Islamic Rule of the World

The following are excerpts from a children's TV show, which aired on Hamas Al-Aqsa TV on April 6-13, 2007. It is followed by other examples of child incitement from the MEMRI TV archives.

Al-Aqsa TV, April 6-13, 2007:

Host Saraa, a young girl: "Sanabel, what will you do for the sake of the Al-Aqsa Mosque? How will you sacrifice your soul for the sake of Al-Aqsa? What will you do?"

Sanabel, young girl on phone: "I will shoot."

Farfour, a Mickey Mouse character in a tuxedo: "Sanabel, what should we do if we want to liberate..."

Sanable: "We want to fight."

Farfour: "We got that. What else?"

Saraa: "We want to..."

Sanabel: "We will annihilate the Jews."

Saraa: "We are defending Al-Aqsa with our souls and our blood, aren't we, Sanabel?"

Sanabel: "I will commit martyrdom."...

The transcript page has links and quotes from and to other shocking child abuse videos from Arab and Persian TV.

Update: Does AP think the mouse is preaching an "Islam takeover" or "resistance?"

Another Review for Nadia

Columbia's tenure-tracked Nadia Abu el-Haj scores another scathing review, this time by Haifa U Professor, Sondra M. Rubenstein: Denial of Heritage

...Since the book closes with a paean to the destruction of a site of traditional Jewish veneration - Joseph's Tomb in Nablus: "In destroying Joseph's Tomb Palestinian demonstrators eradicated one ‘fact on the ground'" - I assume that Ms. Abu El Haj might very well like to eradicate all of the ancient Hebrew ostraca and other artifactual evidence of an ancient paleo-Jewish presence as well. Lacking that power, she demands that the presence of ancient Israelites in the Land of Israel be deconstructed.

Since there is no evidence for Arab/Muslim national-cultural continuity in the Land of Israel dating to before the Arab conquest of the seventh century, this young woman demands that we level the playing field by pretending that evidence of Jewish national-cultural continuity does not exist either. The modern Jewish/Israeli belief in ancient Israelite origins" becomes a "pure political fabrication," to be understood as an "ideological assertion comparable to Arab claims of Canaanite or other ancient tribal roots." This eliminates the "hierarchy of credibility" (here she follows Cooper and Stoller, 1997, Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World) in which "facticity" is conferred only upon the former.

Unfortunately, Ms. Abu El Haj's approach also eliminates the standards of evidence upon which scholarly work is based...


Herod's Tomb

Cool stuff: Archeologist: King Herod's tomb desecrated, but discovery 'high point'

The archeologist who located King Herod's tomb at Herodium said Tuesday that the grave had been desecrated, apparently shortly after his death, but called the discovery a "high point."

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem announced Monday night that it has uncovered the grave and tomb of Herod, who ruled Judea for the Roman empire from circa 37 BCE.

Professor Ehud Netzer of the university's Institute of Archaeology told reporters Tuesday that the tomb was discovered when a team of researchers found pieces of a limestone sarcophagus believed to belong to the ancient king...


Watchdog Groups Call Out UN Human Rights Council

What else is new? Well, I suppose this helps in planting the seeds of skepticism in people's minds when they hear the wonderful pronouncements of the august body. The UN and its bureaucracy aren't going away, the best we can hope for is to mitigate the damage.

YNet: Watchdogs criticizes UN Rights Council

The UN Human Rights Council has failed to criticize egregious human rights violations since it replaced a discredited UN rights body last year, two watchdog groups said Monday.

The two groups, UN Watch and Freedom House, released reports charging that rights violators such as Cuba, Saudi Arabia and China have shielded themselves — and countries such as Sudan and Zimbabwe — from criticism as members of the new group.

The groups said the UN General Assembly is also expected to select several other countries with poor rights records to become new members of the body this month. The groups named Angola, Belarus, Egypt and Qatar as candidate nations that were unqualified for membership because of their poor rights records.

UN Watch, based in Geneva, described the council's first year as "profoundly disappointing."

"Members are supposed to be elected based on their human rights records, yet the council includes persistent violators, and after the upcoming elections is expected to include several more," the UN Watch report said. "The council's record so far is profoundly disappointing."...

That's diplo-speak for "total bullshit."

The Human Rights Council, which began its work last June and has no power beyond drawing international attention to rights issues, was meant to replace the highly politicized Human Rights Commission with a new body that could keep some of the worst offenders out of its membership.

Instead, critics say, it has been dominated by African and Muslim countries that have sided with China, Cuba and other countries in preventing criticism of any government but Israel. The United States has also not sought a seat on the council, accusing it of anti-Israel bias.

According to UN Watch, the council has issued 12 country-specific resolutions: nine censures of Israel and three "non-condemnatory" resolutions on Sudan.


Monday, May 7, 2007

Wahhabi Rules: Islamic Extremism Comes to Bosnia

Wahhabi Rules: Islamic Extremism Comes to Bosnia

It was a strange scene. Over 3000 followers of the radical Wahhabi current of Islam had come to the northeast Bosnian town of Tuzla to bury their leader Jusuf Barcic, who had recently died in a traffic accident. The coffin in front of the mosque was draped in a green cloth. Men with long beards chanted "Allahu Akbar": "God is great." As press photographers tried to photograph the scene, they were first cursed and then beaten. The police did nothing. "We did not expect there to be so many people," an officer told the newspaper Oslobodjenje.

Religious fundamentalism is on the rise in Bosnia-Herzegovina. There had not previously been any mass demonstration of this size. But the local media have for some time now noted a marked increase in the activities of the Wahhabi sect, which counts al-Qaida founder Osama Bin Laden among its adherents. Barcic's funeral in Tuzla on March 31 was yet another sign that Wahhabism in Bosnia had ceased to be a marginal phenomenon. According to Resid Hafizovic, a Professor at the Faculty of Islamic Studies in Sarajevo, the sect represents a "potentially deadly virus" for Bosnian Muslims.

An episode in February caused a particular stir. Jusuf Barcic and a group of his followers wanted to enter the venerable Careva mosque in downtown Sarajevo, in order to perform the Wahhabi prayer rites. For the first time in the over 500 year history of the mosque, the Imam had to lock the doors. Only the arrival of the police could prevent clashes between Barcic's followers and followers of the indigenous Bosnian form of Islam. Already last year, there had been a massive brawl in the town of Kalesija after the Wahhabis occupied the local mosque there and chased off the Imam.

Such incidents remain relatively isolated. But the Islamists are increasingly brazen about their presence. In Sarajevo, for instance, one sees more and more people who respect the fundamentalists' prescripts: men with shaved heads and long beards wearing shin-length pants and women covered from head to foot in long black robes. Wahhabi "vice squads" have already been known sometimes to beat young couples whose public displays of affection violate the Wahhabis' strict moral code. According to a recent survey conducted by Prism Research, nearly 70 percent of the two million Bosnian Muslims reject Wahhabi doctrine. Thirteen percent, however, subscribe to it...

Saudi money. Saudi influence. Know anyplace around here fitting that bill?

According to former holy warrior Ali Hamad, "There are people in the current Bosnian leadership who very much welcomed our arrival in the country back then." In the meanwhile, former Wahhabis who have left the sect have founded a non-governmental organization that is sounding the alarm. "The problem was ignored for more than 10 years," Jasmin Merdan of the Sarajevo-based Center for the Prevention of Terrorism notes, "The not exactly enviable situation in which we find ourselves now is the result."

There are people speaking out about such influences here at home, before they reach such levels, but the demopaths and their dupes are using the courts to try to prevent it.

[via PJM]

This should be interesting...

Hamas Rep: We Will Not Accept a Solution in Which Haifa, Jaffa, and Acre Will Remain Israeli Cities

memrihamaspeace.jpg

In a few short sentences, a Hamas rep lays out the program.

MEMRI TV: Hamas Representative in Lebanon Osama Hamdan: We Will Not Accept a Solution in Which Haifa, Jaffa, and Acre Will Remain Israeli Cities

The following are excerpts from an interview with Hamas representative in Lebanon Osama Hamdan, which aired on Al-Manar TV on April 2, 2007.

Osama Hamdan: We in the Hamas movement will not accept any solution that would deny us our rights or detract from our principles. In other words, I will not accept a agreement saying that at the end of the day, Haifa, Jaffa, and Acre are Israeli cities, and part of the Israeli land. It should, at the very least, say that these cities cannot be liberated or regained today, but I will not accept any solution that prevents any future Palestinian generation from acting to liberate and regain the rest of the Palestinian land, if the current generation is incapable of accomplishing this...

...This [Zionist] entity is incapable of making peace. This entity is based on plundering and aggression. Seeking peace with it is a waste of time. What should be sought is a true solution, which will restore all the Palestinian rights, and will lead to an end to the existence of this entity in the region.

With congratulations to the Dutch and the Germans for continuing to do the right thing.

Sunday, May 6, 2007

Hamas Clones Mickey -- More Child Abuse on Hamas TV

Palestinian Media Watch: Hamas steals Mickey Mouse image to teach hate and Islamic supremacy

The Hamas Television is using a clone of Disney’s Mickey Mouse to teach children to hate Israel and America, and aspire to Islam’s inevitable and impending world domination.

The squeaky-voiced Mickey Mouse lookalike, named Farfur, is the star of a weekly children’s program called Tomorrow’s Pioneers on the official Hamas TV station (Al-Aqsa TV). Farfur and his co-host, a young girl named Saraa’, teach children about such things as the importance of the daily prayers and drinking milk, while taking every opportunity to indoctrinate young viewers with teachings of Islamic supremacy, hatred of Israel and the US and support of "resistance" – the Palestinian euphemism for terror.

Farfur tells children that they must pray in the mosque five times a day until there is “world leadership under Islamic leadership.” The earnest and soft-spoken Saraa’ explains that the nucleus of this world Islamic leadership will be from “all of Palestine,” i.e., including Israel. Farfur refers to Israel as “the oppressive invading Zionist occupation,” which the children must "resist."

In a religious warning that is striking, considering the young age of the target audience, Saraa’ announces that after death, the children will have to answer to Allah for what they did or did not do for the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, and for Palestinian prisoners:

“I remind you that Al-Aqsa and the prisoners are a responsibility on our shoulders, and Allah will ask us on Resurrection Day what we gave for their sake.”

The writing in this show is quite sophisticated. Farfur's performance is unquestionably funny and entertaining, as is the character’s comic timing. For example, as he rhymes off a list of world figures, he chirps: “We will win, Bush! We will win, Condoleezza! We will win, Sharon!” Then, without missing a beat, he quips, “Ah, Sharon is dead” (sic), reinforcing his message that the plan for world domination is progressing.

Using a character based on an appealing, world famous and beloved icon like Mickey Mouse to teach Islamic supremacy and resistance as Islamic duty is a powerful and effective way to indoctrinate children.

The effectiveness of this program is heightened by including child viewers, who phone in to the show and recite poems with images of hate and violence; for example, “We will destroy the chair of the despots, so they will taste the flame of death;” and, "Rafah sings ‘Oh, oh.’ Its answer is an AK-47. We who do not know fear, we are the predators of the forest."

It is unclear what screening process, if any, is used in the selection of the poems to be recited. Either the themes are selected by the screeners, which reinforces the hate orientation of the program, or they are the initiative of the children and parents, which demonstrates the great success of the show's hate messages.

Click here to see selections of Farfur – the Mickey Mouse clone...

There are transcript excerpts at the PMW entry. Like this:

Farfur: “Yes, we, tomorrow’s pioneers, will restore to this nation its glory, and we will liberate Al-Aqsa, with Allah’s will, and we will liberate Iraq, with Allah’s will, and we will liberate the Muslim countries, invaded by murderers.”

Saraa’: “Yes, they are children occupied by the Jews, but with the will of Allah, we will resist and protect against the Zionist occupation.”

Sick.

History Podcasts

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Conquest to Kettering

Not really together, but I haven't linked to Breath of the Beast in awhile and thought I'd draw your attention to some good posts over there. There's Indian Guilt and the American View of Islam Part I, and particularly Part 2, which is my favorite of this lot. This story of the toad is good, as is this one about Charles Kettering.

Even the most moderate...

...is a fraud when you get right down to it.

Efraim Karsh reviews the moderate celebre Sari Nusseibeh's new book in the New York Sun: A Palestinian Two-Step

About Nusseibeh:

My most memorable meeting with Sari Nusseibeh took place in London in the spring of 1989. I was then a senior fellow at Tel Aviv University's Jafee Center for Strategic Studies, and like many well intentioned Israelis at the time and since, we aspired to lay the ground for Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation through secret talks with Palestinian interlocutors, including members of the Palestinian Liberation Organization...

...The meeting was pleasant and informative enough, with the courteous British hosts going out of their way to accommodate both sides, yet I was left with a nagging sense of foreboding. I was particularly taken aback when Mr. Nusseibeh, even then widely considered the epitome of Palestinian moderation and a staunch proponent of Arab-Jewish coexistence, turned out to be the most extreme member of the group. Dismissing out of hand the two-state solution — Israel and a Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip — he instead sang the praise of the "one-state paradigm" — a standard catchphrase for Israel's destruction — demanding the incorporation of the West Bank and Gaza population into the Jewish state as full-fledged citizens, to be followed by the refugees from the neighboring Arab states and beyond...

About the book:

...But Mr. Nusseibeh is not someone to be bothered by the facts. His text is marred by countless factual errors and inaccuracies that cast a serious doubt on the validity of his personal narrative, not to mention the wider historical and political picture he seeks to paint. The British foreign secretary who made the famous declaration (in November 1917) on "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people" was Mr. Arthur James Balfour, not " Lord Alfred Balfour," and the declaration was made in a letter to Lord Rothschild, not to Chaim Weizmann. Lawrence of Arabia had nothing to do with the Anglo-Hashemite correspondence that led to the "Great Arab Revolt" of World War I, and the person with whom the British plotted the revolt was Emir Hussein ibn Ali (later King Hussein of the Hijaz), not his son Emir Faisal (misrepresented by Mr. Nusseibeh as " Sheikh Faisal Hussein"). Neither did the British ever promise Faisal (or Hussein for that matter) the headship of the Arab kingdom that would be established on the ruins of the Ottoman Empire. General Edmund Allenby did not occupy Palestine with his Mule Corps but rather with the powerful Egyptian Expeditionary Force, and the Ottoman potentate Djemal Pasha did not surrender to the British in 1917, as it was only in late September 1918 that Allenby scored his culminating victory, in the Battle of Megiddo. Sheik Izz al-din al-Qassam, the Syrian religious fanatic operating in Palestine in the mid-1930s, was not hanged by the British but killed in action. The Higher Arab Committee (established in 1936) comprised 10, rather than six, members and Jaffa's Arab population in 1948 didn't amount to 200,000 people, but to about a third of this figure. The Dome of the Rock was built by Caliph Abdel Malik ibn Marwan and not Mu'awiya, and Caliph Omar did not capture Jerusalem in 638 C.E. after the bloody conquest of Baghdad and Cairo for the simple reason that both cities were established long after the Muslim capture of Jerusalem. And so on and so forth...

More, including a reminder of the bizarre history of Jerusalem posted at the Al-Quds U site, I linked to some time ago, here.

[via Martin Kramer]

Sandmonkey not done yet

Friday, May 4, 2007

Hamas Minister Kept out of Netherlands, Blames the Jews

Anti-Semitism was at the center of Hitler's attack on Roosevelt. "We know what powers stand behind Roosevelt. It is the eternal Jew who thinks his time has come to inflict on is what we shudder to see and must experience in Soviet Russia." It was, he continued, "Franklin Roosevelt's and the Jews' intention to destroy one state after another." The was was a matter of the "existence or nonexistence" of nations. If given the opportunity, Roosevelt and the Jew "would now exterminate National Socialist Germany." The United States under Roosevelt was striving for "unlimited world domination" and would deny Germany, Italy, and Japan the necessities of national survival. For the "National Socialists," he continued, it was "no surprise that the Anglo-Saxon-Jewish-capitalist world [found] itself in a common front with Bolshevism." This was the anti-Nazi coalition of the Weimar era projected onto a world stage.

Roosevelt and the United States had enraged Hitler from the beginning of the war, well before the United States had entered it. He was convinced that if Roosevelt had not supported Churchill, Britain would have agreed to a negotiated settlement following the German victories of 1939 and 1940. In the summer of 1941, Roosevelt's decision to offer assistance to the Soviet Union thwarted German hopes for a quick victory on the eastern front. By December 1941, Hitler, who had invaded and occupied most of the countries on the Continent, with the exception of neutral states and his own allies, blamed the war on the president of a country on the other side of the Atlantic. He and his propagandists presented Nazi Germany as the innocent victim of the aggression of others. Hitler never accepted any responsibility for the war that he, and he alone, had initiated and expanded.

Jeffrey Herf, The Jewish Enemy, pp.131-132

Reuters: Belgium keeps Palestinian minister out

Dubai - Police at Brussels airport denied entry on Friday to a Palestinian minister heading for the Netherlands, after the Dutch authorities learned he was a member of the Islamist party Hamas and cancelled his visa.

"They (police) told us not to leave the plane and are not even allowing us to get up from our seats. They have acted in a provocative manner," Palestinian Youth and Sports Minister Basim Naeem told Al Jazeera television by cellphone.

Naeem said police showed him and his bodyguard documents which said he would be denied entry to the Netherlands, where he was due to attend a conference on the Palestinians and Europe in Rotterdam on Saturday.

A Belgian interior ministry spokesperson confirmed he had been turned back.

"We acted on a request from the Dutch," he said. "They were sent back (to Cairo) this afternoon as the Dutch issued the visas by mistake, not knowing they were Hamas members."

Naeem said the Dutch Foreign Ministry had told him his visa was valid, and blamed the incident on what he called the Dutch "Jewish lobby" which supports Israel...

Palestinian minister refused entry to Belgium

Youth and Sports Minister Bassem Naim, a Hamas member, arrived in Brussels on a flight from Egypt after being granted a visa by Dutch authorities in Tel Aviv. But he was prevented from disembarking by 10 Belgian police, said Majed al-Zeer, director of the London-based Palestinian Return Center and one of the organizers of Saturday's conference on Palestinian refugees.

"What happened on the flight was the humiliation of the Palestinian people," Al-Zeer told The Associated Press. "He was not even allowed to go to the toilet."...

I'm not generally big on Hitler/anybody-living-today direct analogies, but I think this one is interesting. The fact is that Hitler and his lieutenants actually believed in a conspiracy of "World Jewry" against them and that it explained why peoples they thought should be naturally friendly to them (the Aryan British) and enemies of each other (America and the Soviets), weren't. The fact that the world, independent of a Jewish conspiracy, were on to him (finally), wasn't a strong enough meme to overcome the Jew hatred burdening his mind. He really believed in the conspiracy, and couldn't get out of his own self-contained paradigm to see the truth of his enemies' motivations. Likewise Hamas.

Chomsky Likens West Point Cadets to Terrorists -- Audio

Some months ago, Noam Chomsky was invited to speak at West Point. Two weeks ago, he spoke at Suffolk University here in Boston. Responding to a question about Hizballah [link to MEMRI report and Al Manar video of Chomsky's visit], here's what he said (as best as I can tell -- the audio is a bit scratchy):

Yeah, I met with uh...Hizballah in the 1980's was...a terrorist group...no doubt of it...later than that it's...hard to say they're not accused of anything [indecipherable - much?] in fact that since Israel withdrew from Lebanon, uh, there wasn't a single, in[?] 2000 there wasn't a single rocket or other attack attributed to Hizballah. They were fighting against Israeli occupation [indecipherable]...uh, but I've met with much worse terrorists than that...a couple of months ago I gave a talk at West Point.

...and the crowd went wild. Seriously.

Here is the audio. You can listen for yourself.

With many thanks to Hillel Stavis for the audio.

[Note: If you link this, please link the entry, not the audio directly. It probably won't work, and I'll be changing the format (and thus the url), later.]

Dersh vs. Finkelstein

Point Dershowitz, in the pages of the Wall Street Journal: Finkelstein's Bigotry (requires paid subscription -- reposted in full in the forum -- registration required). Here's an excerpt:

...Facing tenure denial, Mr. Finkelstein opted for a tactic that fit the times. He expressed views so ad hominem, unscholarly and extreme that he could claim the decision was being made not on the basis of his scholarship, but rather on his politics.

Mr. Finkelstein does not do "scholarship" in any meaningful sense. Although his writings center on Israel (which he compares to Nazi Germany) and the Holocaust, he has never visited Israel and cannot read or speak German -- precluding the possibility of original scholarship.

Prof. Bartov characterized his work as an irrational Jewish "conspiracy theory." The conspirators include Steven Spielberg, NBC and Leon Uris. The film "Schindler's List," Mr. Finkelstein argues, was designed to divert attention from our Mideast policy. "Give me a better reason! . . . Who profits? Basically, there are two beneficiaries from the dogmas [of Schindler's List]: American Jews and American administration." NBC, he says, broadcast "Holocaust" to strengthen Israel's position: "In 1978, NBC produced the series Holocaust. Do you believe, it was a coincidence, 1978? Just at this time, when peace negotiations between Israel and Egypt took place in Camp David?" He argues that Leon Uris, the author of "Exodus," named his character "Ari" in order to promote Israel's "Nazi" ideology: "[B]ecause Ari is the diminutive for Aryan. It is the whole admiration for this blond haired, blue eyed type." (Ari is a traditional name dating back to the Bible.) He has blamed Sept. 11 on the U.S., claiming that we "deserve the problem on our hands because some things Bin Laden says are true.") He says that most alleged Holocaust survivors -- including Elie Wiesel -- have fabricated their past.

Like other anti-Semites, Mr. Finkelstein generalizes about "the Jews"; for example: "Just as Israelis . . . courageously put unruly Palestinians in their place, so American Jews courageously put unruly Blacks in their place." He says "the main fomenters of anti-Semitism "are 'American Jewish elites' who need to be stopped." Normally, no one would take such claims seriously, but he boasts that he "can get away with things which nobody else can" because his parents were Holocaust survivors.

And then, of course, there is me. In a recent article, "Should Alan Dershowitz Target Himself for Assassination?" Mr. Finkelstein commissioned a cartoon by a man who placed second in the Iranian Holocaust-denial cartoon contest. The Hustler-type cartoon portrayed me as masturbating in joy while viewing images of dead Lebanese on a TV set labeled "Israel peep show," with a Star of David prominently featured...

Candace de Russy comments:

...One detail of Dershowitz’s account of Finkelstein’s career stands out: After being “fired by ‘every school in New York,’” according to Finkelstein's own account, “radical Islamist Aminah McCloud – a follower of Louis Farrakhan – helped him land a job at DePaul.”

We know well that extremist academics have been systematically at work for decades hiring clones of themselves and replicating their ranks. But there has been little public naming and scrutiny of the backgrounds of exactly who has served on the committees responsible for the one-sided cloning and replication.

Learning more about the scholarship and activism of McCloud, for example, strikes me as a worthy enterprise. And, how about similarly checking into who exactly committed the dastardly deed of hiring the disgraced Ward Churchill?...

[h/t: Marathon Pundit]

Gaza Chaos

...again, from Avi Issacharoff: Ignoring the chaos

For several weeks now the Gaza Strip has been burning. This is not a matter of fighting between Hamas and Fatah activists or actions by the Israel Defense Forces, but battles between armed groups that for the most part are identified with large clans. Nearly every day for the past two weeks ,men, women and children have been killed in Gaza. Every day civilians are being wounded by deliberate or stray gunfire, the result of the unrestrained use of weapons. The number of armed men in the Gaza Strip, according to various estimates, is greater than 100,000. These men belong to security mechanisms, political organizations and above all to clans, and are trying to ensure the economic interests of their kinfolk. There is a tremendous amount of weaponry in the inhabitants' homes, the entire purpose of which is a potential quarrel with a neighbor, an acquaintance or a driver on the road.

In recent weeks attacks on Western and Christian targets in the West Bank have also become common. Members of terror cells identified with Al-Qaida-type organizations - compared to whom Hamas people look like boy scouts - are blowing up and destroying institutions linked to Western culture such as the American School, a church library and dozens of Internet cafes...

...Even more obvious is the silence of the human rights organizations that publish reports on the roadblocks and the movement restrictions in the territories, while in the Gaza Strip crimes against women are being committed. Cases of women being beaten happen all the time and do not make headlines; worse than this are the cases of killings for "family honor." In recent months, the corpses of four women who were murdered for this reason have been brought to Gaza hospitals, but the number is higher. Women who are murdered are buried by members of their family in secret, and their deaths are not reported to any official body. The Palestinian media also refrain from reporting on this, for the sake of "family honor."...

As one commenter writes, "No Jews = No News."

Hot Saudi Girls

memrihotsaudis.jpg

The webcam goes on and the veil comes off. Saudi women overcome domestic repression...

MEMRI TV: Saudi Women, Oppressed by Husbands, Turn to Stripping in Internet Chat Rooms in Search of "Admiration"

Reporter: Behind closed doors and far from any supervising eyes, they remove their shame and turn their backs on all customs and traditions. Girls display their bodies in chat rooms on the Internet, in most cases, free of charge. As soon as one of these girls places the camera in front of her, she begins to strip, displaying her seductive charms to more than 300 young men of different ages. Some believe that the phenomenon of stripping over the Internet may be understood within the framework of social hypocrisy, especially since they believe that our religious and educational discourse does not attribute importance to the strengthening of self-restraint, and prefers the appearance over the essence. This drives some people to play several roles and wear several masks...

"Postmodernizing" Archaeology at Barnard

Seems the word to use would be "redefining" the entire scholarly pursuit. Candace de Russy goes through the entire Nadia Abu El Haj saga in brief and, in doing so, lucidly explains just what the issues are here -- what's at stake -- that go far beyond Israel/Palestine. Do scholars have to provide and value evidence anymore, or will Marxist affinity group meetings replace dirty hands and bleary eyes?

“Postmodernizing” Archaeology at Barnard (lengthy excerpt):

Nadia Abu El-Haj is an assistant professor at Barnard College who deserves more scrutiny from everyone interested in the degenerate methods by which great universities are destroyed.

The greatness of modern, western-style universities – the thing that separates them from all the academies that went before them – is that facts and theories asserted in universities must be supported by verifiable evidence. At the old academies, an appeal to Aristotle, Confucius, or the Bible was enough to support an idea. In the modern university, theories are judged by Occam’s razor, explanatory value, and verifiability of the supporting facts...

...In her introduction, El-Haj explains that she works by “rejecting a positivist commitment to scientific method,” writing, instead, within a scholarly tradition of “post structuralism, philosophical critiques of foundationalism, Marxism and critical theory and … in response to specific postcolonial political movements.” And the particular theory that El-Haj puts forward is that the “ancient Israelite origins” of the Jews is a “pure political fabrication” – a machination she proceeds to blame on “Israeli archaeologists” who were called upon to “produce … evidence of ancient Israelite and Jewish presence in the land of Israel, thereby supplying the very foundation, embodied in empirical form, of the modern nation’s origin myth.”

Deplorably, in the rarified air of Morningside Heights, some Columbia faculty appear to celebrate this sort of “liberation” of scholarship from any necessity to encounter verifiable facts. For example, Keith Moxey, the Ann Whitney Olin Professor Professor of Art History at Barnard College and one of five members of the committee that will vote on El-Haj’s tenure bid, lauds “The abandonment of an epistemological foundation for … history and the acknowledgment that historical arguments will be evaluated according to how well they coincide with our political convictions and cultural attitudes collapses the traditional distinction between history and theory.” (See Moxey’s The Practice of Theory: Poststructuralism, Cultural Politics, and Art History.) In other words, evidence, verifiability, probability and explanatory power become irrelevant, for what counts is that an argument “coincide with our political convictions.”...

...In the highly politicized, post-modern world of El-Haj, however, facts are not facts; instead, as she asserts in her book, they are “produced” as part of “the ongoing practice of colonial nationhood … through which historical-national claims, territorial transformations, heritage objects and historicities ‘happen.’” To acknowledge the mass of archaeological evidence and scholarship that establishes the existence of the ancient Israelite kingdoms would be to participate in a scholarly “hierarchy of credibility” in which “facticity is conferred.” Establishing such a hierarchy “privileges a particular kind of evidence.”

Indeed it does. The kind of evidence it privileges is of the old-fashioned kind that used to be known as verifiable fact...

Much more.

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Bestsellers

A photocaption contest from The David Project:

Hmmm...how about "Aisle 5: Childrens' remedial reading"

The author of the best caption as judged by our staff will will receive a free copy of our feature length documentary on Jewish exiles from Arab lands and Iran, "The Forgotten Refugees" -- in English, Hebrew, Arabic, Spanish, German, Russian or French. See the trailer.

Interactive Planetarium

Coming Home

Five Missing WWII Airmen are Identified

...On Sept. 21, 1944, a C-47A Skytrain crewed by these airmen was delivering Polish paratroopers to a drop zone south of Arnhem, Holland, in support of “Operation Market Garden.” Soon after departing the drop zone, the plane crashed and there were no survivors. The Germans opened the dikes in the region where the plane crashed and flooded the area before any remains could be recovered.

When Dutch citizens returned to their homes in Arnhem the next year, they recovered remains from the Skytrain’s wreckage and buried them in a nearby cemetery. A U.S. Army graves registration team later disinterred the remains which were reburied as group remains in 1950 at the Zachary Taylor National Cemetery in Kentucky.

In 1994, a Dutch citizen located more human remains and other crew-related materials at a site associated with this C-47 crash. They were eventually turned over to U.S. officials...

Soldier Missing in Action from the Korean War is Identified

...In late October 1950, Balanon was assigned to L Company, 3rd Battalion, 8th Calvary Regiment, then engaging enemy forces south of Unsan, North Korea, near a bend in the Kuryong River known as the Camel’s Head. Chinese communist forces attacked the 8th Regiment’s positions on Nov. 1, 1950, forcing a withdrawal to the south where they were surrounded by the enemy. The remaining survivors in the 3rd Battalion attempted to escape a few days later, but Balanon was declared missing in action on Nov. 2, 1950, in the vicinity of Unsan County.

In 2001, a joint U.S.-North Korean team, led by the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC), excavated a burial site in Kujang County, south of Unsan County. A North Korean citizen living near the site told the team that the remains were relocated to Kujang after they were discovered elsewhere during a construction project. The battle area was about one kilometer north of the secondary burial site...

Soldier Missing From The Korean War Is Identified

...On Dec. 1, 1950, Becker went missing in action when the convoy of trucks in which he was riding was ambushed south of Kunuri, North Korea. He was captured and taken prisoner. U.S. servicemen who were held in captivity with Becker said he died in the North Korean Pyoktong POW Camp 5 around May 1951 from malnutrition and disease. He was buried near the camp.

Following the Armistice, the Chinese Army exhumed remains from several POW camp cemeteries and repatriated them in 1954 to the United Nations forces during Operation Glory. Becker’s remains could not be identified at the time and were subsequently buried as unknown remains at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific—the Punch Bowl—in Hawaii...


Carter at Berkley

Hamas: “The extermination of the Jews is good for the inhabitants of the worlds.”

From Palestinian Media Watch:

The extermination of Jews is Allah’s will and is for the benefit of all humanity, according to an article in the Hamas paper, Al-Risalah. The author of the article, Kan'an Ubayd, explains that the suicide operations carried out by Hamas are being committed solely to fulfill Allah’s wishes. Furthermore, Allah demanded this action, because “the extermination of the Jews is good for the inhabitants of the worlds.”

The killing of innocent Jews by terrorist attacks is portrayed as Allah’s plan for the benefit of humanity.

It should be noted that Hamas’s justification for the extermination of Jews, both as God's will and for the benefit of humanity, echoes Hitler's words in Mein Kampf:

“In this case the only salvation remaining was war… If the Jew with the help of his Marxist creed is victorious over the peoples of this world, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity… Thus I believe today that I am acting according to the will of the almighty Creator: when I defend myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” (Mein Kampf)

In another parallel to the Nazi genocide of Jews, the writer says he wants to be sure that “everyone will know” that these murderous actions are “not of [Hamas’s] own accord” – an echo of the Nazi war criminals’ repeated justification of their actions with the defense that they were only following orders.

The fact that these orders are said to be divine in nature makes Hamas’s justification for the murder of Jews even more ominous.

Following is the excerpt from the Hamas article:

"We find more than once condemnation and denunciation to the resistance operations and bombings [suicide attacks], carried out by Hamas and the Palestinian resistance branches. There is no other choice but to use restraint regarding the condemnation, the attaching of the label of terror [to "resistance"], and the assembling of conferences [for] condemnation [of the attacks]. [This] so that everyone will know, that we did this only because our lord commanded so, “I did it not of my own accord” [*] and so that people will know that the extermination of Jews is good for the inhabitants of the worlds on a land, to which Allah gave his blessing for the sake of the inhabitants of the worlds.” [Al-Risalah, April 23, 2007]

[*] Translation of Quranic verse taken from USC Compendium of Muslim Texts.


Dead White Men

Columbia University is a magnificent classical revival campus deeply in thrall to the obsolete ideas of dead white men. The names of Homer, Herodotus, and Plato are carved above the colonnade of Butler Library, and, on sunny afternoons under the benign gaze of the classically-draped goddess of wisdom, members the Young Spartacus League gather to encourage the workers of the world to unite. Someone should tell the little dears that Marxism is dead.

At Columbia, the dead white men who dominate the campus are not Homer, Herodotus, and Plato, but Michel Foucault, Karl Marx and Edward Said. It is the faculty, not the students, who police the campus looking for heretics to burn, and while it is understood that some colleagues will be a little soft on Marxist orthodoxies, no dissent from the dogmas of post-colonialism is allowed.

Post-colonialism, the Gospel According to Saint Edward, is the late Edward Said’s theory that all problems in the third world are the fault of Western imperialism. The theory was first put forward in Said’s now thoroughly discredited book, Orientalism. As with other Holy Books, the Gospel According to Saint Edward cannot be supported by evidence. It is the kind of revealed truth that requires justification by faith alone.

Continue reading "Dead White Men"

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

Please Welcome Emmet Trueman

The post below this one is the first in what I hope are to be a series of contributions from new co-blogger, Emmet Trueman.

Here's how Emmet describes himself:

"Emmet Trueman is a widely-published scholar with a commitment to disinterested, evidence-based scholarship. He will post primarily on areas related to the academic attack on Israel and the Jews."

I'm not going anywhere (sorry to disappoint), but I hope Emmet will be able to add to the content here and increase the odds of there being interesting stuff on hand whenever you stop by. Emmet has been a long-time reader and emailer, so I've no doubt he's got a feel for what's on topic hereabouts.

Judging by this first post and the one I've seen in the pipeline it looks like Emmet will be a top-notch contributor.

I should note that Emmet will be doing his own moderating of comments. Comments are open on this first post, and it will be up to him the level of discourse he will require and the standard he applies.

The Unsolicited Outside Letter; A Regular Part of the University Tenure and Appointment Process

One of the more absurd claims emerging from the controversy over giving tenure to Norman Finkelstein at DePaul is the assertion that any opinion on the fitness of a candidate for tenure coming from outside the university is a violation of faculty rights. According to Gil Gott, a professor of international studies at DePaul who is chairman of its Liberal Arts and Sciences' Faculty Governance Council, if a scholar at another university sends an unsolicited letter to a tenure committee or university president, “the sanctity of the tenure and promotion process is violated.”

Nonsense.

Continue reading "The Unsolicited Outside Letter; A Regular Part of the University Tenure and Appointment Process"

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

From Goebbels to Nasser to...

Pipes on Joel Fishman's JCPA piece, The Big And The Media War Against Israel: From Inversion of the Truth to Inversion of Reality: Where the Nazi "Big Lie" Endures

...Fishman examines particularly the case of Johann von Leers (1902-65), an early Nazi party member, a protégé of Goebbels, a lifelong associate of Himmler, and an overt advocate of genocidal policies against Jews. His 1942 article, "Judaism and Islam as Opposites," lauded Muslims for their "eternal service" of keeping Jews "in a state of oppression and anxiety." This von Leers escaped Germany after 1945 and a decade later turned up in Egypt, where he converted to Islam and became political adviser to Nasser's Department of Information. There, Fishman recounts, he "sponsored the publication of an Arabic edition of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, revived the blood libel, organized anti-Semitic broadcasts in numerous languages, cultivated neo-Nazis throughout the world, and maintained a warm correspondence encouraging the first generation of Holocaust deniers."

Such groundwork proved its value after Israel's historic victory in the Six Day War of 1967, a humiliating defeat for both the Soviet Union and its Arab allies. The subsequent Soviet-Arab propaganda campaign denied Israel the right to defend itself and inverted reality by relentlessly accusing it of aggression. Precisely as Hitler had analyzed in Mein Kampf, if these impudent claims were at first thought insane, in the end they were believed.

Today's political madness, in other words, is directly linked to yesterday's. Might some of today's anti-Zionists be ashamed to realize that their thinking is, however repackaged, but an elaboration of the genocidal deceptions espoused by Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler? Might they then abandon these views?


The Guy Who Runs Al Hurra Doesn't Speak Arabic

That's OK, but you'd think he'd take a little more interest in what's being shown on the channel. Lots of potential in Al Hurra...isn't that supposed to be an important part of the war? The whole war of ideas thing? Shame if it goes down the crapper with the rest of the Arab press...at our expense.

Joel Mowbray: Mad TV - U.S. taxpayers subsidize terrorist propaganda and Holocaust denial in the Arab world.

...With an annual budget now over $70 million, Al-Hurra has for three years served as the centerpiece of America's aggressive post-9/11 courtship of the Arab world. Insiders maintain that the network was fulfilling its mission until it hired former CNN producer Larry Register last November. Mr. Register has not, to his credit, changed Al-Hurra's dedication to showcasing the full range of U.S. politics. The other side of the network, however, has been "gutted," in the words of one staffer. Even though Mr. Register has made some improvements since the March column, Al-Hurra still produces far fewer stories about Arab government corruption and human-rights abuses. (Mr. Register did not respond to repeated requests for an interview.)

Al-Hurra was intended to cut through the anti-West and anti-U.S. propaganda that permeates even mainstream Arab media. Stories in that vein no longer see significant airtime, and nowhere is this more apparent than Al-Hurra's new approach to the Holocaust--the treatment of which in Arab society embodies so much that is wrong in that critical region of the Muslim world.

It is precisely because of Arab society's persistent refusal to accept the existence of such a defining--and indisputable--event in modern history that Al-Hurra dared to do things Al-Jazeera would never fathom, such as interviewing Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel and airing the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. But that was under Mr. Register's predecessor, a Lebanese-born Muslim named Mouafac Harb.

Under Mr. Register, Al-Hurra covered the Holocaust denial conference in Tehran last December. But in a stark break from Mr. Harb's era, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the attendees at his conference were treated with unmistakable deference.

Al-Hurra's Dec. 12 report on the gathering included David Duke's praise for Mr. Ahmadinejad, and it took at face value the organizers' demand for Israel "to provide proof and evidence that certifies the occurrence" of the Holocaust. An official running the event was afforded the opportunity to show the open-mindedness of Holocaust deniers: "If we actually conclude with our experts through this meeting that the Holocaust is a real incident we will at that time admit its presence." (Transcript provided by a fluent Arabic-speaking U.S. government employee.)...

There's more, including what sounds like a description of yet another barely competent Administration official being covered for by political allies.

May 20 -- New England Celebrates Israel

Major event at Gillette Stadium (home of the New England Patriots).

I just wanted to remind you about May 20th, the day when all of New England will come together to Celebrate Israel from 1:00 to 7:00 p.m. at the Dana-Farber Field House at Gillette Stadium.

Come ride a camel! Enjoy an Israeli music festival with Ziv Eitan, Smadar Levi and ESTA. Sample some fine Israeli wine. Eat a few falafel. Watch a professional Israeli Flag Football game.

This free event has something for everyone – archaeological digs and a mini-Maccabi for kids, opportunities for teens to learn the new self-defense craze Krav Maga, a great Shop Israel, and Israeli dancing for all.

Celebrate the best that Israel has to offer, from technology to tourism.

Not sure how to get to Gillette? Visit www.celebrateisrael.org for directions (parking is free), to sign up for free bus service (rsvp’s are required), and to check out the day’s activities.

I look forward to seeing you there.

AND…. PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL ON TO YOUR FRIENDS! HELP SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS FABULOUS EVENT!

CJP welcomes those who would like to connect with the Jewish community and encourages the participation of interfaith families, couples and significant others in all its activities. Dietary laws observed. Kosher food prepared and sold by Gillette in cooperation with Catering By Andrew under the supervision of the VAAD

Presented by
Combined Jewish Philanthropies
Gillette Stadium

Calendar entry.
Web site.

League of Democracies

McCain proposes it (via email):

…We should go further and start bringing democratic peoples and nations from around the world into one common organization, a worldwide League of Democracies. This would not be like the universal-membership – and failed -- “League of Nations” of Woodrow Wilson but much more like what Theodore Roosevelt envisioned: like-minded nations working together in the cause of peace. The new League of Democracies would form the core of an international order of peace based on freedom. It could act where the UN fails to act, to relieve human suffering in places like Darfur. It could join to fight the AIDS epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa and fashion better policies to confront the crisis of our environment. It could provide unimpeded market access to those who share the values of economic and political freedom, an advantage no state-based system could attain. It could bring concerted pressure to bear on tyrants in Burma or Zimbabwe, with or without Moscow’s and Beijing’s approval. It could unite to impose sanctions on Iran and thwart its nuclear ambitions. It could provide support to struggling democracies in Ukraine and Serbia and help countries like Thailand back on the path to democracy. ..

PowerLine wrote about it. Captain Ed spent the most time on it. I'm with Crittenden. Nice sounding on paper, and I'm sure I've said nice things about the concept before, but reality's a bitch. It won't boycott anything (like Iran), because even if everyone agrees (like France), they'd just be leaving the field to the ones left out -- like Russia and China. They'd never agree to intervene anywhere because those Western European countries have already decided they don't do that anymore, and those same countries in Western Europe (for instance) who've already sold their souls buying influence with the Organization of the Islamic Conference would never set aside that power for the sake of what would be seen as simply a modern day Delian League under the auspices of the USA.

Hey, I wish the idea luck, and anything that could be used to deaden the influence of the UN is a nice thing, but I think this concept combined with temporary alliances around specific points of mutual interest would be the way to go...maybe that's what McCain has in mind. Who knows.

Finkelstein at Brandeis

The Brandeis Hoot has a article on the recent Finkelstein appearance there: Finkelstein discusses Israel's human rights record

[At right, a typical DePaul Finkelstein supporter.]

After weeks of controversy, false starts, and wavering club support, The Holocaust Industry author Professor Norman Finkelstein spoke before a crowd of over 100 in the Rappaporte Treasure Hall Tuesday. His three-hour lecture discussed Israel’s human rights record, alleged exaggeration of the Holocaust to exonerate Israeli policies, as well as touching upon his long-time feud with Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

“Dissent is tied to justice, justice tied to dignity,” said Harvard Professor Sarah Roy, who introduced Finkelstein. “Today, there is a war against dissent… our right to oppose has been stigmatized and devalued.” She also claimed that Finkelstein cut through “the artificial web of complexity” surrounding the Middle East Conflict...

Ah yes, it takes a Harvard Scholar to cut through all that "artificial complexity" of the Middle East for us. Presumably, if Israel would just stop being Israel...

“I’m being cast as a martyr these last few weeks,” said Finkelstein of his recent battles at DePaul to earn tenure. “Two thousand years ago, another Jew tried that with mixed results.” Describing former President Jimmy Carter’s controversial book Palestine Peace, Not Apartheid, Finkelstein said that “the actual content of the book… was remarkably uncontroversial… one might even call it tepid.” Instead, Finkelstein said, “what’s most striking is how uncontroversial this is, yet there is so much controversy when you bring it into a public forum.”

Finkelstein as Jesus. Christ. Note the Chomskyisms...what I have to say is all 'uncontroversial' (so don't look to deeply into it). Avram Noam uses the same phrasing.

Sauce for the goose:

He did say, however, that it was “a no-brainer” for Palestinians to cease suicide bombings and terrorist attacks on Israel: “It’s illegal, and Hamas is duty-bound under international law to renounce terrorism.” However, he said, “one of the cornerstones of international law is reciprocity—what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

There you go, according to Finkelstein, international law supports suicide bombing.

Yes, our friend Seva was there, and his quote calls for explanation:

Seva Brodsky, an off-campus audience member, asked Finkelstein during the question-and-answer section of the event, “do you hate your parents? Do you habitually rape your niece?”

I can't speak for Seva, but knowing him, what he had in mind (I heard the audio, and the second question was posed as separate from the first and "rhetorical."), was Ruth Wisse's comeback to hostile questions...a sort of "When did you stop beating your wife?" thing: Why did you kill your grandmother? -- in this case meant as a response to Finkelstein's incessant attacks on Israel and Jews...the fact that it requires explanation and thought...well, I wouldn't have said it, myself, but there it is...

On the Finkelstein tenure front, Marathon Pundit is noting that the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) is supporting Finkelstein's bid (and holding its tongue on the Klocek matter).

[h/t's to Adam Holland for the picture and Eddie for the article]

Stillwell on Brown U's Exercise in Chest Thumping

Cinnamon Stillwell has a closer look at the participants in Brown University's grievance theater: Brown University's Middle East Studies Workshop

...The conference will discuss "new national security regulations" and the "publishing environment faced by scholars writing about the region," as well as "pressures from concerned citizen groups," all of which are seen as impediments to "open discourse and academic freedom."

Ironically, it is the very goal of open discourse and academic freedom that has led organizations such as Campus Watch (a "concerned citizen group" for which I work) to criticize the preponderance of politicized professors in Middle East studies. The Brown University workshop only reflects the one-sided approach to Middle East studies that exists in departments across the country.

The viewpoints represented at this event are far from excluded anywhere in academia. The spin that the dominant voices in the field face repression is positively Orwellian. It is normally pro-American and pro-Israel speakers who are left out of the equation. Proving the point, Blogger Omri Ceren of Mere Rhetoric quotes a member of a campus group at Brown on the workshop:

"There are no pro-Israel speakers, and neither Hillel nor Brown Students for Israel were even asked for input on a conference about the future of Middle East Studies."

The two workshop organizers hardly inspire confidence in a fair and impartial inquiry. Elliott Colla is associate professor of comparative literature and director of Middle East studies at Brown, and Marsha Pripstein Posusney is professor of political science at Bryant University and an adjunct professor of international relations at Brown. Colla was a signatory to a conspiracist open letter, penned in 2002 and signed by a number of academics, claiming that Israel would use the war in Iraq to commit "ethnic cleansing" against the Palestinians. Colla was one of the speakers at an event following an anti-war rally earlier this year in Rhode Island, where he maintained that Iran "doesn't pose a threat to the United States." He also took part in a 2004 panel discussion on "Censoring Campuses" at Columbia in which he made the predictable claim that academic freedom was "being attacked," no doubt in reference to the perceived threat of outside criticism...

See the original for more, as well as embedded links in the above excerpt.

Mumbles Takes Mecca

Ha! I couldn't resist. Now that the floodgates are open for the release of documents from the Boston Redevelopment Authority, loads of interesting stuff is coming in on the BRA's sweetheart deal with the Islamic Society of Boston's Mosque project.

I'm pleasantly surprised that the Boston Globe is on the case, coming on today with a front page expose on the prima facie conflict of interest on the part of BRA official Muhammad Ali-Salaam. Ali-Salaam was instrumental in greasing the wheels of the deal, apparently coaching the ISB in ways to get the best deal possible from the taxpayers whose interests he was supposed to represent, even attempting to arrange a trip to Saudi Arabia for his boss at the BRA, Mayor Tom Menino (affectionately known as "Mumbles" for those of you not familiar) and "two state legislators he identified as political allies of the mayor, Senator Dianne Wilkerson and Representative Gloria Fox" according to the article. The trip apparently never took off.

This must be an uncomfortable issue for the left-of-center establishment to pursue, so good for them, but really, if you wanted to be multi-cultural and welcoming to Muslims in your community, about the last place you'd appeal to for the form of Islam that met your community needs and standards would be Saudi Arabia (and maybe Iran, and Gaza, and Egypt...but I digress), so good on the Globe and Donovan Slack for asking the right kinds of questions and staying on the case. Your subpoena is in the mail...haha.

Here are a few snips...

BRA official asked help from mosque backer - Pushed for mayoral visit to Mideast during talks

A Boston Redevelopment Authority official involved with the city's decision to reduce the price of land it sold to the Islamic Society of Boston for a Roxbury mosque asked a Saudi Arabian supporter of the project to help plan a trip to the Middle East for Mayor Thomas M. Menino and two of his political allies, according to BRA documents.

Muhammad Ali-Salaam, the BRA's deputy director for special projects, wrote to Esam Mudeer shortly after the Saudi television executive had met with Menino in Boston in 1998 to discuss the mosque project.

On BRA letterhead, Ali-Salaam wrote that after Mudeer's meeting with Menino, the mayor "demonstrated his support for our efforts" and that Dr. Walid Al-Fitaihi, then trustee of the Islamic Society, suggested to BRA director Thomas O'Brien that he "visit the Kingdom."

O'Brien agreed, according to Ali-Salaam's letter, and the BRA staff recommended that the mayor, three of his aides, and two political allies also be included on the trip. "The necessary protocol and planning for such a venture is beyond my capacity, and I request your assistance," Ali-Salaam wrote.

He said the people who would participate in the trip -- in addition to Ali-Salaam, Menino, and O'Brien -- would include BRA chairman Clarence Jones, BRA board member Joseph Nigro, and two state legislators he identified as political allies of the mayor, Senator Dianne Wilkerson and Representative Gloria Fox. "Wouldn't this be a fitting way to express our gratitude for their support and encouragement?" Ali-Salaam wrote...

Conflicts:

...The newly released documents also include correspondence between Ali-Salaam and Islamic Society officials, in which the BRA official counsels the society on how to negotiate with his agency to get the best deal in their effort to build a mosque, Islamic cultural center, and school on a 45,000-square-foot parcel in Roxbury Crossing.

In one memorandum, marked "confidential" dated Sept. 22, 1989, Ali-Salaam tells Islamic Society trustees that the BRA sold a Roxbury parcel to the US Postal Service several years earlier for $16 per square foot, but he advised the trustees that a Bank of Kuwait appraisal of the potential society land put the value at $6.50 per square foot. He advised the society that the lower figure could be used when negotiating a purchase and said the purchase price could be reduced further by adding community benefits to the project.

Another piece of correspondence in the documents sheds more light on Ali-Salaam's fund-raising for the project and suggests he was aware of the potential for a conflict between his interests as a public official and as a representative of the Islamic Society. In a fax to an Islamic Society trustee in 1998, Ali-Salaam said he had contacted the United Bank of Kuwait about financing for the project and had obtained a letter of interest but had to have the bank official, David Shlosh, rewrite the letter because Ali-Salaam was concerned about violating the state conflict of interest law...

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]