Amazon.com Widgets

November 2006 Archives

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Abu El Haj and the Skepticism of Fires

[Our anonymous academic is back, with more on the Nadia Abu El Haj controversy (previous: Columbia's El Haj slanders...but what are her standards?).]

James Davila of St. Andrew's University in Scotland responded to a New York Sun article recounting the Abu El Haj controversy by writing on Paleojudaica, his blog, that "If this is an accurate representation of what the book says (always a big if in a newspaper article), it does seem daft."

There are probably a lot of people without time to read the whole book, but who wonder what it says. So, here is an excerpt.

But first, a short course for the non-archaeologists among us.

Roman (Second Temple) Judea is well-documented. The details given in Josephus, Tacitus, and elsewhere correspond neatly with the very extensive evidence that has emerged from the archaeological record. For example, part of the triumphal arch known from historical sources to have been erected on the Temple Mount by the Romans was recently discovered in ancient material being illegally bulldozed by the Waqf. The inscription contains the name of Flavius Silva, a name familiar form ancient Jewish sources as the Roman governor of Judea who laid siege to Masada. Evidence of the intense fire that burnt Jerusalem in the year 70 and was described by Josephus has turned up in several digs. (A recent example.)

When coins are found in a secure context, such as under a fallen object in a house destroyed by fire, the fire cannot have pre-dated the coin.

Occam's razor is the rule that, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated, or, parsimonious, formulation. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae. It does apply to archaeology. Judging from the following, Anthropology may be the sole field of knowledge where it has ceased to apply.

Continue reading "Abu El Haj and the Skepticism of Fires"

Sign the Petition! 'Dueling petitions spark debate over immigration'

The Jewish Advocate has published a front-page article on the effort by Miss Kelly and me to get signatures on our petition to support our immigration officials. If you haven't signed yet, please go here, read the background and support this effort. Here is the article in full:

Dueling petitions spark debate over immigration

By Kristin Erekson - Thursday November 30 2006

Arrests of local imams divides community on law enforcement

Two Bostonians expanded the debate on immigration rights to the Web last week as they created an online petition in support of the recent arrests of local Muslim leaders.

Imams Hafiz Muhammed Masood of the Islamic Center of New England in Sharon and Hafiz Abdul Hannan of the Islamic Society of Greater Lowell in Chelmsford, along with Masood’s 24-year-old son, Hassan, were released on bail from the Plymouth County House of Correction last Tuesday.

The Pakistan natives were among 33 individuals taken into custody around the country as part of an ongoing investigation into a visa fraud scheme. The plan allegedly helped large numbers of illegal aliens fraudulently obtain religious worker visas to enter or remain in the states, according to a statement released by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Local bloggers “Miss Kelly,” who asked to be identified only by her online moniker, and Martin “Sol” Solomon, teamed up to write a petition that applauds ICE’s efforts. The document, which had 145 signatures as of press time, was produced after the Boston chapter of the Muslim American Society crafted its own petition last Thursday in support of Masood and Hannan. If the number of signatures breaks the 1,000 mark, “Miss Kelly” and Solomon plan on sending their paperwork to the ICE and other state officials, including Gov. Mitt Romney and Mayor Thomas M. Menino.

“People talk about the need for immigration laws to be enforced, but when [these officials] try to enforce them, they get in a lot of trouble,” said Solomon, who is well known for his political blog, Solomonia.com. “We are not anti-Muslim, but we are supportive of the authorities.”

“Miss Kelly’s” Web site focuses on issues surrounding Christianity and the rise in Islamic fundamentalism, while Solomon’s blog closely monitors local and national anti-Israel actions.

Boston political humorist and WTTK 96.9 FM radio host Michael Graham said he signed the petition for pro-immigration laws because he is “an outspoken critic of illegal immigration.” Graham invited “Miss Kelly” to his Monday show to discuss the arrest of the imams.

“The law is being enforced, and it’s nonsensical to say that because of someone’s religion they are above the law,” Graham added. “If America’s immigrations officers aren’t going to enforce laws in this case, when are they?”

An area Muslim, who is a member of the Islamic Centers of New England, contacted “Miss Kelly” earlier this week, saying that many Muslims – including himself – wanted to sign the pro-immigration law petition but were afraid to.

“I thought, ‘Oh my god, this is crazy,’” “Miss Kelly” said. “People are coming here illegally and circumventing the system. Who cares how nice they are? Why should they get blanket support?”

Yet Barry D. Hoffman, Consulate General of Pakistan in Boston for New England, said these bloggers are just adding to the “tremendous amount of hysteria” against Muslims.

“If people are so interested in upholding immigration laws, then why don’t they arrest the ... Brazilians in Framingham,” Hoffman asked. “As far as these bloggers go, where do they think their grandparents came from?”

The seizure of the imams also sent ripples of shock throughout the local religious community, especially since the men come from prestigious backgrounds. For instance, 48-year-old Masood’s résumé on the Islamic Center of New England’s Web site states that he has advanced degrees from Boston University and Islamic University in Faisalabad, Pakistan.
But MAS has been working hard to boost Masood and Hannan’s images by arranging rallies and encouraging individuals to fast and pray for their support. MAS also formed a petition that garnered more than 1,400 signatures and was passed on to Judge Paul Gagnon during the bail hearing last Tuesday, according to Bilal Kaleem, associate director of the Boston chapter of the MAS. The imams were released on $7,500 bail, and Hassan was given $2,500 bail.

“We wanted to show the judge that there is a deep well of support in the community for these two imams,” Kaleem said. “We wanted to highlight the work they’ve done and what they stand for.”

In the next couple of months, Masood, Hannan and Hassan will likely attend a pre-trial hearing before an immigration judge to determine what relief may be available, according to the Masood’s attorney, William Joyce of the Boston law firm Joyce and Associates.

Rabbi Barry Starr of Temple Israel in Sharon said that while the facts of the case have not been revealed to him, he does view the trio as “kind, compassionate and outgoing” religious leaders.

The Boston Globe's puff piece is here: Muslims embrace their freed leader - Relief, angst as imam faces US visa charges

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Haifa U. Arab Student Calendar Honors Bin-Laden, Nasrallah

Lovely.

An Arab student calendar distributed at Haifa University marks the dates of major terrorist attacks, as well as significant dates in the lives of Arab terrorists such as Osama Bin-Laden.

The calendar, sponsored by the Islamic Movement - based in the Israeli city Um El-Fahm - marks the birthday of Al-Qaeda founder Bin-Laden, the date of PLO leader Yasser Arafat's death, and significant dates in the lives of Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah and jailed Fatah arch-terrorist Marwan Barghouti.

Also noted in the calendar are the anniversaries of the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers in New York and of recent kidnappings of IDF soldiers.

Students belonging to the Islamic Movement rejected criticism by many that the material constituted incitement. Mouad Hatib, the university student who was responsible for distribution of the calendars, said, "I don't understand the big fuss. It's a calendar for Arab students at the university... We mention Nasrallah and the date of the kidnapping of the two soldiers and the killing of eight others as a brave operation that led to the Lebanon war."

Regarding the marking of dates in the lives of Nasrallah, Bin-Laden and others, Hatib said, "It's important that the Arab public remembers its leaders."...

Of course, these jokers don't represent all Arabs in Israel, but they hardly help.

More here.

Mofaz: Arafat agreed to house secret Iranian bases inside PA

America's enemies:

Iran and the Palestinian Authority, then headed by Yasser Arafat, reached a secret agreement in 2002, which called for the creation of branch Iranian revolutionary guard corps bases in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in exchange for military aid to the Palestinian Authority.

Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz, who had been serving as defense minister at the time, discovered the details of the deal on Monday.

According to Mofaz, Arafat formulated the deal with Iranian leaders in secret meetings. Mofaz added that as part of the deal Iran supplied the Palestinian Authority with 50 tons of military equipment as specified by Arafat. This equipment was intercepted by the Israel Defense Forces on munitions ship "Karin A" in 2002.

Mofaz added that the capture of Karin A had revealed the depth of the relations that had begun to form between Arafat and the Iranian leadership. The former defense minister believes that as a result of this affair and the revelation of the budding relationship between Arafat and Iran, U.S. President George Bush changed his attitude and began working towards the removal of Arafat from the Palestinian leadership...


Tuesday, November 28, 2006

France 2 Loses The Second al-Dura Trial

Sounds like something of a technicality:

...Judging that France 2 did not provide proof for the allegation that Pierre Lurçat is the director of the site on which the incriminated statements were published [League de Défense Juïve], the court rejected the plaintiff’s case without further consideration. Will France 2 appeal? Questioned by Véronique Chemla of Guysen Israel News, a visibly embarrassed Maître Amblard said something about further research to find out how to establish individual responsibility for a given website. Maître David Dassa-Le-Deist, delighted by the terms of the judgment, notes that his client has endured six years of legal harassment from a plaintiff that used Wikipedia to establish the chain of responsibility… now snapped by the court.”

See Neo here.

Episcopal Divinity School to co-Sponsor Terrorist-Art Event (Corrected)

Unbelievable (or not). Take a look at the rogue's gallery sponsoring this event (quoted from email):

Jericho Boston Presents

as part of their International Week of Solidarity with Political Prisoners:

Can't Jail the Spirit : Art by Political Prisoner Tom Manning

Can't Jail the Spirit exhibits Manning's paintings of political prisoners, freedom fighters, the earth and people struggling against oppression. Forhis actions, Tom Manning became a political prisoner ad has taught himself to paint inside the prison walls.

Can't Jail the Spirit was first displayed at the University of Southern Maine in Portland, Maine. A week after it went up, it was censored after intense pressure by state troopers and the police to shut it down.

Tom's paintings transcend concrete and razor wire, and show that they still can't jail the spirit!

WHERE: Episcopal Divinity School--Harvard University

OPENING RECEPTION: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 - 6:00-9:00pm

with: [snip list of losers]

For a calendar of related events visit
www.jerichoboston.org

Sponsors include:The Jericho Movement, Haymarket People's Fund, American Friends Service Committee, The New England Committee to Defend Palestine, Councillor Chuck Turner, Councillor Felix Arroyo, Voices of Liberation, episcopal divinity school, and the community church of boston.

www.cantjailthespirit.org

In case you had any doubt, Manning isn't a political prisoner, he's a convicted cop killer:

...Some time shortly after 1965, he was sentenced to five years in prison for armed robbery and assault, serving the last ten months in Massachusetts Correctional Institution - Cedar Junction. He claims it was during these years that he became heavily politicized, through his interactions with other prisoners[1]

After his release in 1971, he married Carol and together they produced three children, Jeremy, Tamara, and Jonathan.

Together with his arrest for the bombings, Manning was also convicted for his role in killing New Jersey police officer Philip Lamonaco during a traffic stop on December 21 1981. The killings launched the largest manhunt in NJ police history[2], and ended with the arrests of Raymond Levasseur, Patricia Gross, Richard Williams, Jaan Laaman, and Barbara Curzi on November 4th 1984, and Manning and his wife Carol on April 24, 1985. All of them were associated with the United Freedom Front...

Harvard EDS take note:

In September 2006, the University of Southern Maine removed his art from an art presentation, and apologised for allowing him to be heralded as a "political prisoner" by event organizers.

I suppose they're afraid of being outdone by the UCC.

Correction (see comments): It appears the organizers, who name the location as "Episcopal Divinity School--Harvard University," don't know that EDS is not actually part of Harvard U (or they don't care and want to give the impression they have the support of Harvard), it's just in the same neighborhood. Post revised.

'Working out the passions' of the Arab Israeli conflict in Australian Schools

Did Ron Francis recently obtain employment in the Australian public schools or something?

School 'terrorist' simulation exercise banned

A SIMULATION exercise in which Year 11 students played Arabs and Israelis has been dropped by NSW schools after parents complained it was creating racial tension and painted terrorists in a sympathetic light.

An inquiry by a senior Education Department officer found the simulation exercise, devised by Macquarie University's centre for Middle Eastern studies, risked creating disharmony in schools and the community and that there was a "significant risk" of harm to the "welfare and wellbeing of students from particular minorities".

Documents given to The Australian show the inquiry was prompted by complaints from parents that background notes presented to the students gave positive descriptions of groups such as Hamas's Qassam Brigades and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Students were not told the groups are listed terrorist organisations and support for them is an offence under Australian law.

The profile of Hezbollah accurately said that its long-term aims were to rid Palestine of the Jewish population and create an Arab state but no mention was made of its terrorist activities, only philanthropic ones.

A profile of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was presented without mention of his sponsorship of international terrorism.

Rather, his goal was listed as trying "to bring the internet to Syria".

Parents complained that students feared being marked down if they did not agree with the dominant anti-Israeli, anti-Western polemic.

The schools simulation is being run by Andrew Vincent, who runs the Macquarie University centre for Middle Eastern studies and was recently criticised in federal parliament for alleged anti-Israel bias. Mr Vincent said he devised the program to help students "work out the passions" of the Arab Israeli conflict.

Asked why the high school simulation was stopped this year, Mr Vincent said: "The allegation was made that we were training terrorists."...

Now that bit about Hizballah is interesting...tell a half truth. Admit they want to destroy Israel, but don't mentioned their violence, only their philanthropy -- an ideal way of making the group and their goals completely palatable and quite possibly sympathetic.

[h/t: Miss Kelly]

Bomb-sniffing bees

Isn't it a problem getting close enough to actually see the bee sticking out its proboscis?

Scientists at a U.S. weapons laboratory say they have trained bees to sniff out explosives in a project they say could have far-reaching applications for U.S. homeland security and the Iraq war.

Researchers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico said they trained honeybees to stick out their proboscis -- the tube they use to feed on nectar -- when they smell explosives in anything from cars and roadside bombs to belts similar to those used by suicide bombers.

Researchers in the program, dubbed the Stealthy Insect Sensor Project, published their findings Monday.

By exposing the insects to the odor of explosives followed by a sugar water reward, researchers said they trained bees to recognize substances ranging from dynamite and C-4 plastic explosives to the Howitzer propellant grains used in improvised explosive devices in Iraq.

"When bees detect the presence of explosives, they simply stick their proboscis out," research scientist Tim Haarmann told Reuters in a telephone interview. "You don't have to be an expert in animal behavior to understand it as there is no ambiguity."...

Hugo Chavez's Massachusetts Allies

Dial Joe-4-Chávez - Massachusetts Democrats love Venezuela's strongman.

Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chávez is an ally of the Iranian mullahs, a supporter of North Korea, a close friend of Fidel Castro and a good customer for Vladimir Putin's weapon factories. Now he's also a business partner of Joseph P. Kennedy II.

The former Democratic Congressman describes the deal he's cooked up with Mr. Chávez as charity for low-income consumers of heating oil. But it's worth asking what the price of this largesse is to Venezuelans and to U.S. security interests.

The arrangement is this: Mr. Chávez's Citgo--a Houston-based oil company owned by the Venezuelan government--is supplying home heating oil to Mr. Kennedy's Citizens Energy Corporation at a 40% discount. Citizens, a nonprofit outfit, says it passes the savings onto the poor, aiming to help 400,000 homes in 16 states that would otherwise have trouble heating their homes. In the process, Mr. Kennedy happens to get a high-profile publicity plug. If you think you qualify, says the television ad that drew our attention to this partnership, just dial 1-877-Joe-4-Oil...

...Massachusetts Democrats seem especially eager to help. In a September 29, 2005, "confidential memorandum" addressed to "President Hugo Chávez" and uncovered by a Congressional committee, William Delahunt (D., Mass.) gushed that it was a "pleasure" to have met with the strongman "to discuss your generous offer." The Democrat advised Mr. Chávez to steer his oil through Mr. Kennedy's nonprofit and declared that "from a public relations perspective" the discount oil scheme "is an extraordinary opportunity to address urgent needs of people living in poverty, while showcasing the compassion of your nation."

Compassion? If fighting poverty is the goal, Mr. Delahunt would do better to remind Mr. Chávez that charity begins at home. The U.S. is far richer than Venezuela and since Hurricane Hugo took power in 1999 Venezuelan living standards have suffered despite soaring oil prices. Annual inflation averaged more than 20% between 2001 and 2005, imposing a tax on the poorest. Meanwhile, an insecure investment climate has taken a harsh toll on private-sector employment and shrunk the middle class.

In his eight years in power, Mr. Kennedy's business partner has also polarized Venezuela with his class warfare, rewritten the constitution, politicized the judiciary, the electoral council and military, and announced he plans to rule until 2021. Freedom House now ranks Venezuela 34th out of 35 countries in the Western Hemisphere in press freedom. Only the Cuban press is more repressed...

...We dialed Joe-4-Oil ourselves to ask directly whether it is also "righteous" to assist an anti-American tyrant at the expense of the Venezuelan people. In between berating our reporter for daring to ask such a thing, Mr. Kennedy said that Mr. Chávez has done "so much more" for the poor than any previous government. As for democracy, he said there was "ample room for improvement in the ways that people get elected in Venezuela as well as in Florida." Mr. Chávez chose his partner well...

[h/t: isirota1965]

 

Palestinian Use of Human Shields: Report

Very interesting report at the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (C.S.S):

The Palestinian terrorist organizations, aware that the IDF will not deliberately attack civilians, have recently made more frequent use of civilians as human shields to protect their bases and operatives. Hamas and other terrorist organizations have publicly praised the tactic of using human shields and called for continuation.
Hamas operative Nizar Rayan announces the organization's intention to use “the bodies and souls” of [Palestinian] civilians to protect the houses of “jihad fighters” [i.e., terrorist-operatives] (Palestinian TV, November 19)Civilians gathered on the roof of the house belonging to Wael Rajab al Sharqa, a Hamas operative (ANB TV, November 20)
Overview

1. The Palestinian terrorist organizations operating in the Gaza Strip frequently use civilians as human shields . They establish their military infrastructure within densely populated civilian areas, launch rockets at Israel from densely populated areas, open fire on IDF soldiers from areas inhabited by civilians and use civilian residential dwellings to hide the openings of the tunnels they dig to smuggle arms.

2. The organizations have recently initiated tactics intended to prevent, or at least hamper, IDF counterterrorist attacks on land and from the air by enlisting Palestinian civilians (including women and children). They send them to areas where fighting is being waged or an attack is about to be carried out and use them as human shields. Two prominent instances were the following...

The rest is here.

The dagger at their throats

Debra Saunders writes a positive look at Daveed Gartenstein-Ross's upcoming book, My Year Inside Radical Islam: A Memoir:

THE DAY after the 9/11 attacks, MIT professor Noam Chomsky wrote of the need "to understand what may have led to the crimes, which means making an effort to enter the minds of the likely perpetrators." What struck Daveed Gartenstein-Ross about Chomsky's response was that "Chomsky made no real effort to enter the minds of the perpetrators. Instead he simply projected his own grievances against the United States onto them."

Gartenstein-Ross had a much stronger idea as to what motivated the 9/11 attackers. After converting to Islam in college, he held a job at the Ashland, Ore., office of Al Haramain, a Saudi-funded charity that sent money to al Qaeda.

In a fascinating memoir due in stores in February, "My Year Inside Radical Islam," Gartenstein-Ross describes how he was drawn to Islam because he saw it as a religion of peace.

Over time, however, he watched himself and those around him seduced into a fanaticism that required them to loathe not only non-Muslims, but also Muslims who belonged to the wrong sect, listened to music or shaved. He had expected an open, accepting religion, only to hear sheikhs arguing that Muslims who leave the religion should be killed, that it is acceptable to kill civilians for jihad and that good Muslims should work to replace democratic governments with Shariah law...

...He believes Americans need a more fact-based understanding of Islam, which requires the media to do a better job of reporting what Muslims think and say -- instead of papering over radical rhetoric. Once when a local reporter visited Al Haramain to write a piece on Ramadan, a co-worker refused to shake her hand, launched a defense of sorts of Algerian terrorists and lambasted a French policy that prohibited schoolgirls from wearing the hijab in class. The comments never made the story. Gartenstein-Ross writes, "And so, as I often did, the reporter chose not to acknowledge that a real clash of values existed here."...

Should be a very interesting read.

Haveil Havalim #95

Monday, November 27, 2006

Columbia's El Haj slanders...but what are her standards?

Once again, we return to Columbia University's (Barnard College) Nadia Abu El-Haj (see: Who's Coming Up For Tenure: Nadia Abu el-Haj). This post, like the previous, was prepared with the help of an "anonymous academic" (and stop guessing, I didn't say what college they work at).

The great archaeologist William Dever has stated that “Barnard should deny Ms. Abu El-Haj tenure," he said, "not because she's Palestinian or pro-Palestinian or a leftist, but because her scholarship is faulty, misleading and dangerous."

Her publisher, the University of Chicago Press, immediately came to her defense, posting an excerpt form the book. The excerpt they posted, however, gives little clue to why William Dever has charged Abu El Haj with “demonizing a generation of apolitical Israeli archaeologists.”

This excerpt from Abu El Haj’s book gives some idea of why the archaeological community is irate:

“The most controversial practice in Israeli archaeology has been the use of bulldozers on archaeological sites. Among Palestinian officials at the Haram al-Sharif and the Awqaf as well as many other archaeologists – Palestinian and European or American (trained) – the use of bulldozers has become the ultimate sign of “bad science” and of nationalist politics guiding research agendas. Critics situate this practice squarely within (a specific understanding of) the politics of a nationalist tradition of archaeological research. In other words, bulldozers are used in order to get down to earlier strata which are saturated with national significance, as quickly as possible (Iron Age through Early Roman.) During the excavation of the biblical site of Jezreel in which I participated, a bulldozer was used in order to more quickly determine the direction and structure of the Iron Age moat. In doing so, the remains above it were summarily destroyed. A joint dig of the Department of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University and the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem, the research priorities of the excavation were defined by the Tel Aviv team. The aim was to study the Iron Age.”

(the footnote to this paragraph reads: “This bulldozing incident occurred a week after I stopped participating in the excavations and was recounted to me after the fact by several participants, both archaeologists and student volunteers. The decision to use bulldozers precipitated quite an argument between the British and Israeli archaeologists digging the site, I was told. With one exception, the former strenuously objected. The exception was a British archaeologist who was a PhD student in the Department of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University, a student of the Israeli archaeologist leading the dig.”)

“While this chronological focus (and its nationalist implications) provides a partial explanation for such excavating techniques, in order to more fully understand when and why bulldozers are used on excavation sites in Palestine/Israel, the practice needs to be situated within a broader set of methodological questions. The practical logic that guides archaeologists at work determines how sites will be excavated and which remains will be produced, carefully recorded, and preserved. At both the Jezreel excavations and the Jerusalem excavations, archaeologists moved through dirt rather quickly. Israeli excavators tend to use large shovels, pick axes and large buckets in order to move through the earth. In contrast, for example, the European (mostly British) trained archaeologists at Jezreel explained that they would prefer to excavate with smaller tools and slower digging techniques, including, for example, sifting dirt in search of very small remains: artifactual, animal, seeds, and so forth These smaller finds are seen as essential to the reconstruction of aspects of ancient daily life. In general, however, in Israeli archaeology – and clearly, on those excavations carried out in Jerusalem’s Old City – the practical work of excavating favors larger (mostly, well-preserved architectural) remains over smaller remains. It is only after “significant finds” have been located that specific loci are more carefully excavated from smaller remains (often pottery shards) that can illuminate the history (the chronology of identity) of the architectural structures themselves or lend insight into the settlement patterns of specific (of significant) stratigraphic layers.” (pp. 148-149)

Readers here [see: Temple Mount Destruction Watch] will marvel at El Haj's invocation of the Waqf as an authority on good archaeological practice in the above: "Among Palestinian officials at the Haram al-Sharif and the Awqaf as well as many other archaeologists – Palestinian and European or American (trained) – the use of bulldozers has become the ultimate sign of “bad science” and of nationalist politics guiding research agendas."

Here is a site that monitors the destruction wrought on the Temple Mount...perpetrated by the self-same people El Haj points to as authorities on archaeological elegance. See photos below.

The archaeologist being charged by El Haj with deliberately destroying Islamic strata for nationalist motives is David Ussishkin, who directed the dig at Jezreel for Tel Aviv University.

If Professor Ussishkin has a response to Abu El Haj, he is welcome to space here to defend his field methods.

Photos of Temple Mount destruction [from this page]:

Heaps of marble pillars that were part of an ancient structure that was dismantled by the Wakf.

Heaps of stones from the structure that was dismantled. These stones are waiting to be cut by the stone saw in the next picture.The huge stone saw. It is located in a warehouse build near the ramp of the Dome of the Rock, from its east side.

A Letter to the Somerville Divestment Project

...From the Massachusetts Attorney General's office. It's not the first. The SDP has received several letters in the past informing them that they are not in compliance with several of the Commonwealth's regulations regarding "public charities" like themselves. Generally these are a pro-forma matter that the State doesn't have the manpower or interest to actually pursue...so the SDP ignored them.

This time the letter comes from an assistant AG, orders a stop in fund-raising, and threatens action against the officers personally. Letter posted below. [click (twice) for larger and legible]

sdpletter1 sdpletter2

Greens for Murder in Massachusetts

This article in Frontpage by P. David Hornik only scratches the surface of how bad the Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts really is. We've looked at this group many times here, and have no doubt, the Massachusetts party is simply a reflection of the national party which is overrun by that alliance of pro-jihadis and the far-far left you keep reading about (no joke).

Hornik:

The Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts didn’t do badly in the state’s November elections. Although its candidates for governor and lieutenant governor, Grace Ross and Wendy Van Horne, won only 2% of the vote, its candidate for secretary of state Jill Stein garnered 18% and its candidate for state treasurer James O’Keefe came in at 16%. Let’s hope the trend doesn’t go any further.

The party was founded back in 1996 as Massachusetts affiliate of the Green Party of the United States. In 1998 Green-Rainbow candidate Stephen Elliot received 12% of the vote for the State Senate, and in 2000 the party achieved official political status when the national Green presidential candidates, Ralph Nader and Winona Duke, got 6% of the Massachusetts vote.

It lost that status in 2004 when the Green-Rainbow ticket didn’t make the 3% threshold in the Massachusetts elections. But it regained it in 2006 when the party came back stronger than ever...

In fact, the GRP got extremely high vote counts even in cities with large Jewish populations like Brookline and Newton. Why? How? First of all, there was no Republican on the state ticket in the Treasurer or Secretary of State races. That left no one for conservatives, or even moderates, to vote for on those tickets at all, and even in the Governor's race, the left-leaning members of those communities could feel completely at ease ticking off the loony-left candidate knowing the Republican had no chance.

Further, the MSM was silent, utterly silent, on the fact of the GRP's anti-semitic, anti-Israel and anti-American positions.

Hamas sacks mayor who met Israelis

How dare Hamas not be willing to meet with the legitimately elected government of Israel! OK, they didn't meet with government officials (it can't be told from the linked story), but you catch the drift. This is how Hamas keeps its "accountable to the people" rep.

Hamas has dismissed the mayor of the West Bank town of Na'leen, Mohammed Soror, and his assistant, Thaer Omaira, after the two were said to meet with Israeli settlers, the Hamas affiliated website Palestine Info reported Monday.

"Proving it was firm on its political stand of not normalizing with the Hebrew state, Hamas Movement has dismissed mayor of the Na'leen town, west of Ramallah city, for meeting with Israeli settlers without permission from the Movement," (sic) the statement on the Hamas website said.

"Hamas explained that the visit made by the mayor and four members of the municipal council (three of them weren't from Hamas) was decided arbitrarily and without consulting the Movement," the report said, adding: "Hamas' policy bans its members from meeting with Israeli officials."

"We are holding members in our movement accountable over any wrong step they may take; yet, others are awarding their leaders who kiss hands of the Zionists and coordinate with them," said the Hamas statement, in an apparent reference to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah...

Ah well, there goes the dialog.

New UN Human Rights Council...Worse than the Old

Even the AP, as published in the International Herald Tribune, notices. They're even harping on the Golan Heights now. Shame on the cowardly EU countries who simply abstain from these things, and kudos to Canada and Stephen Harper for voting no.

U.N. Human Rights Council criticizes Israel — again — but no other countries

GENEVA: The U.N. Human Rights Council on Monday passed two resolutions criticizing Israel, but kept its record intact of singling out no other country for human rights abuses.

The 47-nation council, which has censured only Israel since it began operating six months ago, this time took the Jewish state to task for its occupation of Syria's Golan Heights and for building settlements in occupied Arab territories.

The council voted 32-1 with 14 abstentions to declare illegal Israel's 1981 annexation of the Golan Heights and demand that Israel rescind its decision to impose its laws and jurisdiction on the area, which it captured in the 1967 Middle East war. Canada, which said the resolution was unbalanced, was the only no vote, and European Union members abstained.

Then it voted 45-1 to demand Israel reverse its policy of building and expanding settlements as a first step toward dismantling them. Again, Canada was the only country to vote against the resolution.

The United States and Israel are not members, but Israel's ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva said Syria had proposed the Golan Heights resolution "purely to draw attention away from its ... own deplorable human rights record."

"Under Syrian possession, the Golan Heights were used to launch constant attacks against Israeli civilians," Itzhak Levanon said. "Today, the Golan Heights is more peaceful than ever, stable and thriving. The economy is booming, fields are blossoming, and everyone is enjoying the benefits of democracy."...

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Boston Imams and Immigration: Some local Muslims afraid to speak out

Some very interesting developments in the case of the two Massachusetts Imams up on an immigration rap. Miss Kelly has the story: More on Imam Masood/ Muslims Afraid to Sign Petition

That's right, Miss Kelly has been contacted by a local Muslim and member of that community:

Yesterday, I received an e-mail from a Muslim gentleman who wrote: "Many muslims from the ICNE community wanted to sign your petition but are afraid." ICNE stands for the Islamic Center of New England, and Hafiz Muhammed Masood, one of the two arrested imams, was the spiritual director of the ICNE's Sharon mosque.

Much more here.

Background and link to our petition, here (thanks to all those who have signed so far!).

EU Protecting Terrorist Bank Accounts

Brussels labors under an incredibly broad definition of "Human Rights." [lengthy quote -- tough to excerpt]

Telegraph: The bomber's privacy is paramount By Alasdair Palmer

'The extensive and growing collaboration with the European Union is an essential part of President Bush's strategy for fighting terrorism." That's what the White House believed when the US and EU last held a joint summit on "co-operation to combat terrorists" in 2004. But that collaboration looked very distant last week: the EU declared one of the most basic forms of co-operation with the US in the fight against terrorism "illegal", because it "failed to respect human rights".

What had the US done to incur the wrath of the EU's rights watchdogs? Had it tortured people suspected of terrorism and handed over by the EU for trial in the US? No: the US couldn't do that if it wanted to, because the EU will not hand over anyone for trial in a country, such as the US, where they might face the death penalty.

Had the US discriminated against EU citizens on grounds of religion or race? No: both kinds of discrimination are illegal in the US too, and the laws prohibiting them are probably more zealously enforced there than they are in many EU countries.

What had irked the EU regulators was that the US had been allowed access to records of international bank transfers by Swift, the company that oversees most of them. Swift had thought it was acting responsibly: the point of co-operating had been to help the US in its effort to track down who was transferring money to terrorist bank accounts, and stop them doing it...

The American programme, which has been going on since 9/11, has been surprisingly successful: US law-enforcement officers have managed to identify and freeze well over $200 million in terrorist-related bank accounts, thus preventing the terrorists financing some of the incidents of mass murder that they had planned.

You might have thought this would generate appreciation rather than censure from the EU. After all, the networks of Islamist terrorism are global, as are its financial tentacles. We all benefit when it becomes harder for the terrorists to finance their operations, because that makes it more difficult for them to pull them off. But that's not how the bureaucrats in Brussels see it. They insist that in allowing the US access to some of its transaction records, Swift wrongly put "security interests ahead of norms of human rights".

It is difficult to understand how it can be more important to keep bank transactions private than to prevent mass murder. Unless, of course, you are a terrorist intent on mass murder. What makes the EU's stance even more difficult to understand is that it does allow that "an important public interest" is enough to over-ride the "right" to keep bank transactions secret: the European Commission's Working Party on the Protection of Personal Data stresses that "tax and customs administrations" could take a peek at bank transfers without any rights being violated, as could "the services responsible for social security… and the supervisory bodies in the financial services sector".

So it's fine for the authorities to be given access to the details of the money you have transferred in order to ensure you pay your taxes. But it's a violation of human rights for the state to look at what money you've transferred if the purpose is merely to decrease the chance that someone gets killed by a suicide bomber...

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Axis of Evil Auditions

234332_orig

MEHT: Leader calls for resistance to hegemonic powers

TEHRAN, Nov. 21 (MNA) – The proper way to confront bullying powers is to resist them, given that retreat will not thwart the insatiable appetite of the hegemonic powers, Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei said here on Tuesday in a meeting with Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe.

Commenting on the weakening of the global arrogance (imperialist powers) and the strengthening of the independence-seeking countries, Ayatollah Khamenei said that even today, the global arrogance attempts to control the fate of other nations by waging wars, sowing discord among states, imposing economic sanctions, security measures, political pressure, and propaganda...

...Ayatollah Khamenei called Mugabe a prominent and courageous African figure, saying that the measures he has taken, such as the land reform program which gives formerly occupied lands to Black farmers, are in response to the nation's will.

The Leader referred to Iran's progress in the scientific and technological fields and expressed hope that sharing such experiences with Zimbabwe and the implementation of the agreements the two countries have signed would serve to expand bilateral relations...

Update on the Masood Case -- What degree?

Miss Kelly has an update on the Imam Masood case, here, that demonstrate there's a bit more to the story than the MAS press releases.

Once again, the post with explanation and link to petition is here.

Nablus: Explosive teddy bears found in lab

Teddy Ruxpin in Palestine. Several layers of sickness here:

Nablus: Explosive teddy bears found in lab

A joint paratrooper and Shin Bet force uncovered an explosive lab in Nablus Friday night. In the lab, the forces found teddy bears with wires hanging from them, apparently slated to be used as explosive devices. [simulation at right]

The lab was detonated in a controlled manner, and there were no reports of injuries.

The forces also found in the explosives lab three belts made from cloth, ready to contain explosives, a hollow coat used for hiding explosives, and 20 light bulbs and light sockets used for activating explosives.

Test tubes, a hollow gas tank, hollow pipes, batteries, 40 liters of hydrogen peroxide and ohms were also found in the lab.

Since the beginning of the year, Israel Defense Forces soldiers operating in Nablus hit 41 gunmen who were planning, according to the defense establishment, to hit IDF troops or Israeli citizens.

Some 320 wanted terror suspects were arrested in the West Bank city and its surroundings since the beginning of the year, most of them affiliated with Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Fatah and Hamas.

At the beginning of the year, another explosives lab was uncovered in the city's casba. The forces located the lab in an abandoned building after receiving intelligence...


Arabear lives.

Friday, November 24, 2006

Peggy Noonan: We don't need to solve the immigration problem forever. We need to solve it now.

What Grandma Would Say

...You know the facts. Immigrants are here in huge numbers, unlawfully, in the age of terror. They swell the cost of local life--emergency rooms, schools--which has an impact on local taxes. There are towns and cities that feel, and are, overwhelmed. And no one will help them.

The essential reason, I think, is that America's elites don't want America's borders closed. Businesses want low-wage workers; intellectuals are wed to global visions of cross-border prosperity; politicians want Hispanic loyalty and the Hispanic vote. It's not convenient for any of them to close the borders. If Americans on the ground are enduring difficulties over this, it's . . . too bad. This is further eroding America's already eroding faith in its institutions...

...More and more our leaders forget the common sense of grandma. In most everyone's family there was a grandma who used to sit quietly in the corner and say nothing. Then someone would ask her opinion just to be polite, and she'd say something so wise, so commonsensical, it stopped everyone in their tracks. And you realized that she was smart, that she'd lived a life and seen things.

In the case of illegal immigration in America I think grandma would say, "Stop it. Build a wall. But put doors in the wall so when the problem is over, you can open the doors."

America has, since 1980, experienced the biggest wave of immigrants since the great wave of 1880-1920. And we have never stopped to absorb it. We have never stopped to digest what we've eaten. Is it any wonder we have indigestion?...

Please visit this post: Support for Immigration Officials in the Masood and Hannan Case and sign the linked petition. The government sometimes needs to know it has our support in these things -- especially in the face of whithering criticism. Please pass the link on to anyone you know or other bloggers who may be willing to post it. Thanks.

Middle East academics disregard quest for balance

Pierre Atlas, a member, describes watching the Middle East Studies Association:

...At a roundtable discussion on last summer's Israel-Lebanon war, the five panelists, some from Lebanon and some not, expressed nuanced differences when discussing Lebanon's internal politics. But they uniformly condemned Israel's actions in the war as "aggression," and repeatedly referred to Hezbollah's actions as "resistance." Supporters of Israel argue that Hezbollah started the conflict, and thus it bears ultimate blame for the war's costs. But the panelists expressed a view held by many in the Arab world that Israel has a long history of aggression against Lebanon, that it was looking for any excuse to start the war last summer, and that the United States gave it the green light.

One panelist showed pictures of the war's massive destruction: numerous shots of Lebanese neighborhoods flattened like pancakes, bridges blown apart beyond all recognition, and weeping mothers at funerals of civilian Lebanese killed by Israeli bombs. There were no pictures -- or even any mention -- of the hundreds of Hezbollah rocket attacks on Israeli cities. Lebanon suffered the bulk of the war's destruction, and more than 10 Lebanese were killed for every one Israeli. But does that mean that Israeli suffering should be ignored completely?

Most of the audience's questions were sympathetic to the panelists' point of view, but not all. One MESA member asked why there was no Israeli perspective on the panel, and if this disparity was appropriate at an academic conference. He was told that they did not see the need to have an "Israeli apologist" sitting beside them...

Critics of groups like Campus Watch and efforts to have a public say in tenure decisions constantly rail against efforts that, they insist, are politicizing their sacred space. The fact is, however, such groups and efforts would not exist, or at least in such numbers, were it not for the fact that they are so political in the first place.

[h/t: isirota1965]

Lorna Fitzsimons: Why I'm backing Israel

A former Labour MP writes in The Guardian:

Some said I should have my head examined after I agreed to become the chief executive of a pro-Israel advocacy group, the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre. But people said the same when I joined Labour in the mid-80s.

There is never a wrong time to do the right thing and if, like me, you are convinced of Israel's cause, then why not support Israel and why not now? I have always been a practical idealist, a non-Jew who has always believed in a two-state solution. But I have never been more concerned about the false reality many people are constructing around Israel and the Middle East, here and abroad. Our polling shows that opinion formers know that Israel is a fully functioning democracy, but care more about what Israel does than what Israel is.

Since its birth 58 years ago, Israel has always been prepared to compromise for peace. From Begin's agreement with Sadat in 1979 to the Arafat-Barak talks at Camp David in 2000, Israeli leaders have been prepared to challenge their own people in pursuit of peace. Last summer Israel withdrew from Gaza, angry settlers and all. Yet the terror from the Gaza Strip has continued - more than 1,000 rockets have been fired into southern Israel in the past year. Since 2000, nine fatalities have been caused by Qassam missiles.

Some media have reported the panic these missiles have caused but they downplay the impact because of the small scale of fatalities compared with those on the Palestinian side. My husband, a British soldier, is currently serving a tour of duty in Iraq. His unit has come under mortar fire nearly every night for the past six months. Not many service personnel have been killed by these missiles but every soldier fears that the next one might have his or her name on it. Do you think that a child, a parent or a grandmother in one of the towns bordering Gaza thinks there have been "only" nine fatalities? Can you imagine what that does to a civilian population?...


Paris: Plain Clothes Officer Shoots and Kills Protecting Tel Aviv Soccer Fan

AP: Plain clothes officer kills one person in soccer skirmish

PARIS: A plain clothes police officer shot into a crowd of skirmishing soccer fans Thursday as he tried to protect a supporter of the Hapoel Tel Aviv team, killing one person and injuring another, police said.

The 11 p.m. (2200 GMT) incident at a McDonald's fast food restaurant near the Parc des Princes stadium occurred after Hapoel Tel Aviv's 4-2 victory over Paris Saint-Germain in a UEFA Cup match.

The officer, who was not identified, was trying to protect a Hapoel Tel Aviv fan set upon by some 150 PSG supporters, police said. He lobbed tear gas when the crowd went after him then fired two shots, "having been driven into a corner," police said.

Two people were injured, with one dying later, police said. The victims were not identified.

The Paris prosecutor's office and the National Police General Inspection unit, which probes incidents involving law enforcement officers, were investigating, police said.

More detail here.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Lisa Ramaci-Vincent accepts Kurt Schork Award on Behalf of Steven

Judith has a link to video and commentary. The included media discussion panel on new technology and the media is interesting in various ways, although watching Christiane Amanpour complain that if only the media had been more activist, things might have been different in Iraq is a bit with the sick making (everyone knows where the media stood, Christiane).

In any case, a well deserved award for, I'm sure, a great guy, Steven Vincent.

David Aaronovitch: A debate of the deaf poisoning young minds

There will be a sentence or two some here may take exception to, but overall Aaronovitch, as usual, makes excellent points:

Invective and insinuation cloud the Palestinian issue

There I was last Thursday night, addressing the Cambridge Union, going at it like a locomotive with a mouth, and telling them that, no, you couldn’t blame terrorism on US foreign policy. I mean, take the Istanbul bombings, two of which were exploded at Turkish synagogues, killing Turkish Jews, how could those . . . “Point of information!” came from my left, in the tones — I rather thought — of Berkshire. “Was it not the case, Mr Aaronovitch, that the successful murdering of Istanbul Jews was motivated by a revulsion to Israeli policy, a policy supported by the Americans?” And there was applause.

Applause, readers, not just a nodding of heads at a true, if sad, analysis — but a clapping as of a rhetorical victory gained. I should have replied that this logic would permit BNP members to assault any Muslim near, say, the Green Lanes mosque, and have it argued on their behalf that their action was really the product of Islamist outrages on 9/11. But I didn’t think of it in time.

Maybe the applauders thought of themselves as friends of Palestine...

Aaronovitch goes on to refer to anti-semitic British writer Richard Ingrams, who some may recall was the guy who wrote in The Guardian:

I have developed a habit when confronted by letters to the editor in support of the Israeli government to look at the signature to see if the writer has a Jewish name. If so, I tend not to read it.

Aaronovitch:

...But for heaven’s sake, don’t listen to me, because I’m one of them. So says Richard Ingrams writing in The Independent recently. “Israel’s Fifth Column to which I recently referred,” said Ingrams, “has achieved another little victory in its propaganda war.” The “victory” was a programme I was asked to make for Five to balance one by the strangely fatuous philosopher, Ted Honderich, justifying suicide terrorism, and I as a “staunch defender of Israel” was part of this fifth column. Honderich himself seems to suggest that my programme was all part of giving Jews disproportionate influence in public argument.

I am not a “staunch defender of Israel” any more than I am a staunch defender of Poland, and rather less than I am a staunch defender of Spain. Nor, Mr Ingrams, for all your Boratian insinuation, do I write what I do because my secular father was born Jewish and chose to keep the name and therefore I feel I have a mystical blood bond with my racial family. My problem is that I am discovering that those who are pretending to be “friends” of the Palestinians are busily constructing the notion that Israel is the sole cause of the problems of the Middle East. And I now realise the extent to which they have poisoned the debate in Britain, especially among the young...

Odd statement that..."Fifth Column"...generally a fifth column is operated by an enemy. Are Israel and Britain enemies? Are Britain and its Jews?

Supporting John Bolton

There is a petition you can sign, here.

There is also the "Blogging for Bolton" page here. It includes Senate contact numbers.

Bolton is my litmus test to see who's looking out for the US first and who's just out to make partisan points by taking a scalp close to the President.

Louise Arbour Video

There's a brief video interview with UN Human Rights High Commissioner Louise Arbour at YNet, here. The first question, with the interviewer comparing Qassam missiles to the Holocaust in some way is silly (please let's not overdo the Holocaust comparisons). Her response concerning the Beit Hanoun incident is slightly annoying, but her statement about Abu Mazen is interesting, as is her complimentary statement about the Israeli Supreme Court, about which my emailer remarks:

her words about the Israeli supreme court are interesting: this is the court (headed by barak) who declare the judgment of the Intl UN court about the fence/wall to be short sighted and voided of any factual as well as normative basis.... (well my words not theirs)

Petition: Support for Immigration Officials in the Masood and Hannan Case

Here is the text of the petition [click to sign]:

To: Immigration officials involved in the case of Imams Hafiz Masood and Abdul Hannan, and other interested public officials

We, the undersigned, would like to thank you for your efforts in enforcing our nation's immigration laws. We would like to assure you of our continuing support in the face of what must be extreme pressure to drop this matter.

We encourage you to continue to pursue this matter in a fair manner consistent with the vigorous application of the rule of law and without regard to pressure group tactics which will attempt to stifle your efforts.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

Here's a brief explanation by way of a recap of the events:

A week ago Wednesday, immigration officials arrested 33 people on immigration fraud charges, including 4 from Massachusetts. Among those four were two prominent Imams, Hafiz Masood of the Islamic Center of New England (ICNE), based in Sharon, MA and Abdul Hannan from the Islamic Society of Greater Lowell in Chelmsford who also serves as chaplain for the Middlesex House of Correction in Billerica and the Cambridge Jail.

The gist of the allegation is that the two were acquiring bogus religious worker visas for people who weren't really religious workers.

The case is similar to one from a couple years back when a guy named Muhammad Khalil was running a "Mosque" out of a Brooklyn basement, vouching for bogus religious worker visas and pocketing hundreds of thousands of dollars cash. Oddly enough, one of the allegations against Chelmsford's Hannan is that he fraudulently obtained his visa from this very same Brooklyn Khalill in 1997.

The Imams are now out on bail, but not before much agitation on the part of the Muslim American Society, the ACLU and others, who were encouraging the signing of petitions, the packing of courtrooms, calls to government officials and cries of harassment.

Previous posts on this issue on this blog are here, here and here.

Miss Kelly, who has been watching this issue very closely and will likely be the blog to watch for breaking coverage, has a post decrying the weak news coverage of the event (of course), with links to her previous posts that will catch you up to date very well, here. Her post on the petition is here.

Now you've got the background. Given the pressure that our public officials must be under in this case, Miss Kelly and I are sponsoring a petition to support them -- it is something of a counter to the petition that the MAS put up earlier. You can see the text quoted above, and can sign on to it by clicking here.

I would like to emphasize that we are neither judge, jury nor investigators. We do not know the people involved, all of whom may be fine people and pillars of their communities. The fact is, however, that many of us have called for serious immigration enforcement, and have been disappointed with the repeated flouting of those laws, yet when the authorities take action, there are dozens of groups who step forward to make life as difficult as possible for them. We believe that it’s entirely appropriate that citizens also step forward to support the authorities operating on our behalf when the situation calls for it.

I think you will find the text of the petition measured. We are calling for support, while not attempting to dictate any particular outcome.

Again, the petition may be found here.

Update: The Jewish Advocate has written a story about this issue and our petition effort, here: 'Dueling petitions spark debate over immigration'

Happy Thanksgiving!

Happy Thanksgiving to all the Solomonia family!

Our friend Tom Glennon sends in this, the original proclamation of the day. Enjoy.

Abraham Lincoln's Thanksgiving Proclamation

Washington, D.C.
October 3, 1863
By the President of the United States of America.

A Proclamation.

The year that is drawing towards its close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union. Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defence, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle or the ship; the axe has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and the country, rejoicing in the consiousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.

No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American People.

I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity and Union.

In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the City of Washington, this Third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.

By the President: Abraham Lincoln


Wednesday, November 22, 2006

UN Rights Commissioner refuses to meet abducted soldiers' families

UN Rights Commissioner refuses to meet abducted soldiers' families

The families of kidnapped soldiers Eldad Regev, Ehud Goldwasser, and Gilad Shalit protested on Tuesday to United Nations representatives in Israel following the refusal of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, to meet with them.

The coordinators of the effort to free the soldiers said Arbour, who is now in Israel, finally said no to a meeting after avoiding a direct answer for two weeks.

The families want to discuss UN efforts to attain signs of life from the three soldiers.

Benny Regev, brother of Eldad Regev, said the families were "furious and disappointed" at Arbour's refusal to meet with them.

He said Arbour has "no small responsibility for the well-being and security of the men, as part of Resolution 1701."

He added that he hoped Arbour "would reconsider and consent to meet with us and examine ways to return Udi [Ehud], Eldad and Gilad."...

Someday maybe the Red Cross will get to visit the soldiers themselves, and someone will make an issue of the fact that they haven't.

Ethnic Cleansing Hamas Style

Hamas vows to target Israel town until residents leave

Gaza City, Nov 21: The armed wing of the ruling Palestinian Hamas movement on Tuesday said that its militants would continue to fire rockets on the Israeli town of Sderot until its inhabitants leave.

"Only the departure of residents from Sderot will stop the rocket fire," Ezzedine al-Qassam brigades spokesman Abu Obaida told media persons.

"There are no limits on our rocket attacks and we will prove that in coming days. We advise residents of Sderot to evacuate," the spokesman added.

Six people have been killed in Palestinian rocket attacks against the depressed southern town of 30,000 residents since the second Palestinian uprising broke out in September 2000.

"The Zionist enemy makes residents of Sderot believe it can stop rocket fire thanks to incursions and raids that it wages daily in the Gaza strip. We tell them rockets will continue to fall," Abu Obaida said.

More: WND: Terrorists give order: Jews must evacuate - Israeli towns near Gaza bombarded by rocket attacks since withdrawal

Temple Mount Destruction Watch

The Temple Mount...one of the front lines of the Muslim Empire and demonstrator of the Islamic ability to play well with others: At Mideast holy site, what is treasure? - Yahoo! News

...Among finds that have emerged are a coin struck during the Jewish revolt against the Romans, arrowheads shot by Babylonian archers and by Roman siege machinery, Christian charms, a 3,300-year-old fragment of Egyptian alabaster, Bronze Age flint instruments, and — the prize discovery — the imprint of a seal possibly linked to a priestly Jewish family mentioned in the Old Testament's Book of Jeremiah.

And the finds keep coming. On a drizzly November morning, Gabriel Barkay, the veteran biblical archaeologist who runs the dig, sat in a tent near the mounds examining some newly discovered coins stamped by various Holy Land powers: the Hasmonean dynasty of Jewish kings more than 2,000 years ago, a Roman procurator around the time of Pontius Pilate, the early Christians of the Byzantine Empire, two Islamic dynasties and the British in the 20th century.

Considering the wealth of findings, it is odd, perhaps, that this is an excavation that was never supposed to happen.

Jews revere the Mount as the site of their two ancient temples. Muslims believe it's where the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven during a nighttime journey recounted in the Quran. Two mosques stand on the site, as do some of the temple's original retaining walls, including the Jewish shrine called the Western Wall, but there is no visible trace of the temple itself.

The site has been the frequent arena of Israeli-Palestinian fighting, and its volatility has prevented archaeologists from ever touching it.

In November 1999, the Waqf, the Muslim organization that administers the site's Islamic holy places, opened an emergency exit to an ancient underground chamber of stone pillars and arches known to Jews as Solomon's Stables and to Muslims as the Marwani mosque.

Ignoring fierce protest from Israeli archaeologists who said priceless artifacts were being destroyed to erase traces of Jewish history, the Waqf dug a large pit, removed tons of earth and rubble that had been used as landfill and dumped much of it in the nearby Kidron Valley.

The Waqf's position was, and remains, that the rubble was of recent vintage and without archaeological value...

...When it removed the rubble, the Waqf was trying to destroy evidence of Jewish history on the Temple Mount, said Uri Ragones, a foundation spokesman. "We are going back to Jerusalem physically, learning about it and uncovering our past. We're touching our deepest roots as a people."

For its part, the Waqf says it wasn't destroying any evidence of Jewish presence — because there isn't any...

The Jews remember how respectful the Jordanians were when they had the city from '48 to '67, and anyone watching can see very clearly what would happen if the Arabs got it again. (see previous: Murdering History in the Dark)

Australian FM: Western appeasement fuels anti-Israel fire

Autralian FM: Western appeasement fuels anti-Israel fire

AUSTRALIA must set an example in the West by its continued refusal to appease Israel’s enemies, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer told a Jewish audience in Melbourne.

Addressing more than 200 people at the official reopening of the rebuilt Beit Chabad Ohel Devorah in St Kilda East earlier this month, Downer said Australia must continue to actively oppose, rather than merely abstain from, anti-Israel resolutions at the United Nations, a number of which he had signed off on earlier that day.

“We are always being told the best thing for diplomacy is to ... abstain ... And I say, ‘Let’s vote against it because it is wrong.’

“The more we and other countries stand up to this sort of behaviour, the more we stand a chance of success the more we try to appease, the more [anti-Israel resolutions] we will encourage.”

Speaking on the 68th anniversary of Kristallnacht, Downer said the horrific consequences of the appeasement shown to the Germans in the 1930s must encourage us to “confront evil when we find it and deal with it and not find excuses to walk on the other side of the road and do nothing about it”.

“This very day we confront the ideological scourge of extremist Islamist terrorism. I don’t think the world should forget that these people want to eliminate Israel. It’s not as though they never say they do it’s not as though they keep it a secret.”...


Keeping the mob noise out of the Ivory Tower

Inside Higher Ed examines what seems to be becoming a "Public Comment Period" (a public that includes school alumnae) in hiring and tenure decisions at university -- and effort this blog is pleased to be a part of. (see most recently: Who's Coming Up For Tenure: Nadia Abu el-Haj and Barnard Alumnae Opposing Tenure for Anthropologist Abu El Haj)

Middle East Studies Association President Juan Cole is, unsurprisingly, not pleased with the way things have gone, preferring the closed-door method. This is supposed to guarantee a tenure or hiring decision based on scholarship and free of political factors. After all, we all know how a-political college campuses are.

The article focuses on the cases of Abu El Haj and Wadie Said, son of Edward. Input or Intrusion?

An emailer points out this response by Barnard College President, Judith Shapiro: A Message to Alumnae from President Judith Shapiro and remarks:

Note the paranoia about outside agitators, "At the same time, I will share with you my concern about communications and letter-writing campaigns orchestrated by people who are not as familiar with Barnard as you are, and who may not be in the best position to judge the matter at hand."

This is an entirely Alumnae-driven campaign. It is orchestrated by Paula (Rubenstein) Stern, Barnard, Class of 1982, A Barnard graduate now living in Israel. Shapiro can have no evidence that this is "orchestrated" by anyone other than alumnae, because it is not. It is no more being "orchestrated" by Campus Watch than it is being "orchestrated" by Inside Higher Ed, which also covered the issue.

But the basic message to alumnae is, buzz off. We want your money, not your opinions. You got your education here, but you are not sufficiently well educated to read a book and judge the caliber of its scholarship.


Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Annan: UN rights council should focus on Darfur

This won't happen, not even as a fig leaf. Count on it. But at least ol' Koffi actually said something: Annan: UN rights council should focus on Darfur

The UN Human Rights Council should broaden its focus beyond the Palestinian-Israeli issue to avoid accusations it is one-sided, Kofi Annan said Tuesday.

Speaking to reporters in Geneva for the last time before he steps down as secretary-general at the end of the year, Annan said the council's preoccupation with Israel's actions in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories while ignoring the situation in Darfur had caused some to wonder whether it had "a sense of fair play."

"They (the council members) have tended to focus on the Palestinian issue, and of course if you focus on the Palestinian-Israeli issue without even discussing Darfur and other issues, some wonder 'what is this council doing?"' he said.

The 47-member council, which earlier this year replaced the discredited Human Rights Commission, has been severely criticized by some countries, including the United States, for moving four times to condemn Israel but not taking up human rights violations in Myanmar, North Korea or Sudan.


Israeli Academics -- Threat or Menace?

The NY Sun covers a Middle East Studies Association panel on whether Israeli Academics deserve to be boycotted: Debating the Place Of Israeli Academics

...The décor in a major tourist hotel was representative of the now-compulsory and trivial nod to Judaism in America's secular and commercial culture. Inside the hotel, the Middle East Studies Association of North America hosted a panel on the rectitude of a boycott against academic institutions within the Jewish state as part of its annual meeting. The panel, formally titled "Academic Freedom and Academic Boycotts: A Symposium," offered two proponents of such a boycott, Lawrence Davidson of West Chester University and Omar Barghouti, a Palestinian researcher, and two opponents, Joan Scott of the Institute for Advanced Study and Joe Stork of Human Rights Watch...

...The debate provided by MESA, which came out against the boycott of Israeli academics in May 2005, was narrowly drawn. It pitted a pair of academics who urged an immediate ban on doing business with Israeli counterparts against another pair of Israel's critics who argued academic freedom ought to be preserved. At times abstruse, the vocal argumentation evoked the heated discussions among the various shades of leftist at the CCNY Alcoves in the 1930s.

" Israel's research institutions have granted legitimacy on those that recognize … apartheid, ethnic cleansing," Mr. Davidson, who is pro-boycott, said. "The Zionist near-monopoly has allowed Israelis to build support for the racist stereotype of Arab." Mr. Barghouti charged that the acceptance of Israeli academics brings legitimacy to the nation as a whole. " Israel's academy plays a major role in sustaining the apartheid system and colonialism … academic institutions are more important to Israel than academic institutions in the U.S."

While both Ms. Scott and Mr. Stork vocally opposed the boycott on a number of philosophical and tactical grounds — among them, the idea that the best response to a disliked idea is more speech, an unwillingness to hurt those Israeli academics who might oppose the policies of Israel's government, a desire to maintain the principle of academic freedom — neither offered words of defense of Israel overall. Ms. Scott, for example, reminded the more than 100 audience members of the importance the idea of academic freedom held in debates with David Horowitz, a conservative activist who has targeted leftist extremism in academia...

Barghouti, one may recall, is a hypocrite of the first order who serves as one of the traveling front-men of the academic boycott effort while simultaneously working as a PhD candidate at...Tel Aviv University. As for the "anti-boycott" side, the record of Human Rights Watch is well known, while Joan Scott, again it may be recalled, once commented, in defense of the AAUP regarding their publication of overtly anti-semitic material in preparation for a conference on the subject of anti-Israel academic boycotts:

...The conference was not called off because of the inadvertent inclusion of an anti-Semitic article in a packet of reading materials. That was the last straw in a carefully orchestrated campaign to abort the conference by a lobby of people (pro-Israel occupation)who believe that any representation of a point of view other than theirs is ananthema...He fails to identify the “critics” as lobbyists on behalf of the current Israeli regime (or fellow travellers of those lobbyists)...

This is the kind of "balance" you can expect to find from MESA -- 'we all agree that Israel is bad, we just question how far to go in doing something about it.'

Saudis to Britain: Hands off our prostitutes!

Bribes for the Saudis on behalf of British business (specifically arms sales) interests:

...Now BAE’s methods are coming under intense scrutiny, after the Serious Fraud Office began investigating claims of a £60 million “slush fund” used by BAE to pay off Saudi Arabian dignitaries. This money is alleged to have helped to provide prostitutes, Rolls-Royce cars and Californian holidays. BAE has always denied any wrongdoing...

Much more detail here, including the fact that the Saudis are now threatening a cut-off of all cooperation with Britain if they don't stop investigating the scheme. It's like dealing with the Maffia, once you're in, it's tough to go straight again: Blair hit by Saudi 'bribery' threat

SAUDI ARABIA is threatening to suspend diplomatic ties with Britain unless Downing Street intervenes to block an investigation into a £60m “slush fund” allegedly set up for some members of its royal family.

A senior Saudi diplomat in London has delivered an ultimatum to Tony Blair that unless the inquiry into an allegedly corrupt defence deal is dropped, diplomatic links between Britain and Saudi Arabia will be severed, a defence source has disclosed.

The Saudis, key allies in the Middle East, have also threatened to cut intelligence co-operation with Britain over Al-Qaeda.

They have repeated their threat that they will terminate payments on a defence contract that could be worth £40 billion and safeguard at least 10,000 British jobs.

The Saudis are furious about the criminal investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into allegations that BAE Systems, Britain’s biggest defence company, set up the “slush fund” to support the extravagant lifestyle of members of the Saudi royal family.

The payments, in the form of lavish holidays, a fleet of luxury cars including a gold Rolls-Royce, rented apartments and other perks, are alleged to have been paid to ensure the Saudis continued to buy from BAE under the so-called Al-Yamamah deal, rather than going to another country. Al-Yamamah is the biggest defence contract in British history and has kept BAE in business for 20 years...

Honest and friendly governments don't require bribes to stay honest. Crooks stop cooperating the second they stop getting the payoff.

Ramadan Shalah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader, publicly admits that Israel’s security fence is an important obstacle to the terrorist organizations

IMG_0026 IMG_0026

From the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (C.S.S)Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (C.S.S):

Ramadan Shalah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader, publicly admits that Israel’s security fence is an important obstacle to the terrorist organizations, and that “if it weren’t there, the situation would be entirely different.” The PIJ has carried out the greatest number of suicide bombing attacks during the past few years.

...On November 11, PIJ leader Abdallah Ramadan Shalah granted a long interview to Al-Manar TV, Hezbollah's television channel. During the interview, for the first time he admitted that Israel 's security fence was an important obstacle to the terrorist organizations (the “resistance”).

He noted that the suicide bombing attacks ( istishhad ) were the Palestinian people's “strategic choice,” and were meant to “create a balance of force and deterrence” in the campaign against a superior enemy. Ramadan Shalah noted that the terrorist organizations had every intention of continuing suicide bombing attacks , but that their timing and the possibility of implementing them from the West Bank depended on other factors. “For example,” he said, “there is the separation fence , which is an obstacle to the resistance, and if it were not there the situation would be entirely different .”...

Lebanese Civil War Watch: Pierre Gemayel Assassinated

Lebanese minister assassinated in attack on convoy

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Lebanon's Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel was assassinated near Beirut on Tuesday, security sources said.

They said gunmen opened fire as his convoy drove through the Christian Sin el-Fil neighbourhood. Gemayel was rushed to hospital where he later died of his wounds.

Lebanon is in the throes of a political storm pitting the anti-Syrian ruling majority against the pro-Damascus opposition. The political tension threatens to spill into street confrontations.

Lebanon's Prime Minister Fouad Siniora said on Tuesday his depleted cabinet was legitimate despite the resignation of six pro-Syrian ministers, and warned that any anti-government protests could turn violent.

Pro-Syrian Hezbollah and its allies are preparing to take to the streets to topple Siniora's government, which they accuse of being allied with the United States, arguing that it has lost its legitimacy since Shi'ite Muslims are no longer represented...

Update: As always, keep an eye out at Across the Bay, and there's a big round-up at Pajamas Media.

Monday, November 20, 2006

Iranian Animated Entertainment

iranagain

1930's in color alert. The video:

MEMRITV: Anti-American Animated Film on Iranian TV

"Bonus," loosely (or not so loosely) related material: What is Americanism? by Julius Streicher

...One has to be foolish or irredeemably stupid to believe that anything good can come to Europe from the land of presumed opportunity. That that did not happen after the First World War, and will not happen after the second. The Jews have made America what it is today: a nation raped by the Jews, a nation whose 130,000,000 people of many colors and races have been forced into helping the Jews achieve world domination! The descendants of European immigrants do not govern the United States of America today. The foreign and domestic policies of the country are made by the Jews and their lackeys. The American people wanted peace, but were maneuvered into war by Delano Roosevelt, a tool of World Jewry, who himself has Jewish blood in his veins. It was the same in World War I, when Woodrow Wilson, also a tool of the Jews, maneuvered it into the war...

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Israel's Bolton

Gillerman. At Yid With Lid:

"If France was shelled from across the border, what would the French do? Would the French government send flowers to their attackers? Well, by voting for this resolution you will be sending flowers to the terrorists, flowers which tomorrow will be laid on the grave of the next Israeli victim."

Gillerman was also quoted as saying over the weekend that the French were "more active in furthering the passing of the resolution than the Qataris, who initially presented the resolution."...

...Following his speech, Gillerman walked past the French Ambassador without greeting him. The disregard was apparent even at lower echelons. Israeli diplomats have recently begun regarding France as a hostile force in the Security Council as well as the EU. “It (France) is truly and Arab extension,” one Israeli diplomatic source said...


Dog Drama

Respect for Life

Sounds like someone knows damn well that Israelis are not indiscriminate blood-thirsty bombers. Looks like the Palestinians have a new tactic -- or at least an old one they're willing to use frequently: IDF calls off strike after hundreds shield Gaza militant's house

The Israel Defense Forces canceled a planned air raid on the home of a militant in the northern Gaza Strip on Sunday after several hundred Palestinians barricaded themselves inside the building, an IDF spokesman and witnesses said.

Palestinian sources called the protest the first of its kind to have in effect prevented an air strike by the IAF. An IDF spokesman said the strike had been called off so to avoid inflicting civilian casualties.

Hundreds of Palestinians formed a human shield around the home of the militant in Beit Lahia late Saturday to prevent an Israel Air Force air strike on the building, residents said.

An IDF spokesman confirmed the raid had been called off because of the protest.

"The attack plan was canceled because of the people there," the spokesman said. "We differentiate between innocent people and terrorists."...

...People flocked to the home of Mohammed al-Baroud after he received a warning from the army late Saturday giving him 30 minutes to leave the house. Barhoud is a commander in the Popular Resistance Committees in the town who is in charge of firing homemade rockets at Israel. Crowds of people stood on the rooftop and in the yard of the home.

Israel routinely orders occupants out of homes ahead of air strikes on suspected weapons-storage facilities, saying it wants to avoid casualties. The incident in Beit Lahia was the first time Palestinians have tried to prevent such an airstrike.

The crowd chanted anti-Israel and anti-American slogans, and people said they were prepared to give their lives to protect the home. "Yes to martyrdom. No to surrender," the crowd chanted...

One may wonder if the Arab population of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza might represent the same deterrent to an Iranian nuclear strike. Don' count on it: Palestinians: Our human shield against Iran nukes?

...But Tehran cannot consider a nuclear holocaust against Israel without taking into account those whom Iran holds to be rightful Muslim heirs to Muslim land. The Islamic republic cannot erase the State of Israel without killing large numbers of the very people whose lives it has sworn to protect: the Palestinians.

There was a time, not so long ago, when many Israelis believed that no Arab power would attack Jerusalem, for fear of damaging the holy sites sacred to Islam. Moreover, there was a feeling that Arab powers would refrain from attacking both the holy city and the territories, in order to avoid Palestinian casualties.

But long-held taboos governing the actions of Muslim fighters have been bent, broken and discarded with impunity in recent years. In Iraq, the February bombing of the Al-Askari mosque, one of the holiest of all shrines to Shi'ites ? apparently at the hands of an Al-Qaida cell - was followed within a day by reprisal attacks on no fewer than 161 Sunni mosques.

Where Islamists once refrained from killing non-combatants, especially Muslims, the number of Muslim non-combatants killed in Iraq has grown so astronomically as to resist accurate count.

During the recent war in the north, nearly half of the Israeli civilians killed by Katyusha rockets fired by Iran's client militia Hezbollah, were Arabs.

Under certain circumstances, might Iran sacrifice the Arabs of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, to say nothing of a million Muslim Israeli citizens, in a cataclysmic assault on the Zionist entity?

More directly, would Iran be willing to kill off millions of Arabs if that were the price of exterminating the state of Israel?

The truth, one wishes, were "No." But the real truth, one suspects, is "Not yet."...

Zahra Kamalfar Trapped In Moscow

At Pajamas Media:

Sources close to Iranian dissident Zahra Kamalfar state she has been living with her children under unspeakable conditions in the transit area of Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport for 73 days (now more). A one-time demonstrator against the extremist theocracy, she escaped from an Iranian prison when on a two-day furlough to visit her children. She ended up being buffeted from country to country, then spent months in a Moscow deportation motel before being ejected and left to float in the transit area of the airport. Now in imminent danger (possibly Monday, if the Russians cooperate) of being taken back to the Islamic Republic for the Mullah’s version of justice, Ms. Kamalfar speaks out in this dramatic video smuggled out of the airport to Pajamas Media.

More at the PJM entry.

Too bad she's not Palestinian. The world press would be all over it.

Shows of Support

Miss Kelly is none-too-pleased with the fact that the Muslim community is rallying behind their arrested Imams (previous here and here) without much concern over whether they're guilty or not: Muslim Leaders Response to Arrest of Boston Imams

The MAS and company are calling for people to sign petitions and come out to face down the authorities. Miss K suggests that the immigration authorities are the ones who deserve support. Not a bad idea.

Jeff Jacoby: 'they live in a nation that affords such freedom even to idiots and ingrates.'

Jacoby takes on the cancellation of Junior ROTC by the San Francisco School Board: Antimilitary bigotry

...So what is the problem with JROTC? There isn't one. The problem is with the anti military bigotry of the school board majority and the "peace" activists who lobbied against the program on the grounds that San Francisco's schools should not be sullied by an association with the US armed forces.

"We don't want the military ruining our civilian institutions," said Sandra Schwartz of the American Friends Service Committee, a far-left pacifist organization that routinely condemns American foreign policy and opposes JROTC nationwide. "In a healthy democracy . . . you contain the military." Board member Dan Kelly, who voted with the majority, called JROTC "basically a branding program or a recruiting program for the military." In fact, it is nothing of the kind: The great majority of cadets do not end up serving in the military.

But then, facts tend not to matter to smug ideologues like Schwartz and Kelly, who are free to parade their contempt for the military because they live in a nation that affords such freedom even to idiots and ingrates. It never seems to occur to them that the liberties and security they take for granted would vanish in a heartbeat if it weren't for the young men and women who do choose to wear the uniform, willingly risking life and limb in service to their country.

According to The Chronicle, scores of JROTC students were on hand when the school board met last week; many of them burst into tears after the vote. Sad to say, they should probably have seen this coming. For in its trendy anti military animus, the school board was hardly breaking new ground...

Some Say FOX is the moral equivalent to Al Manar

So says an op-ed in today's Boston Globe written by a faculty member of the American University in Cairo, Lawrence Pintak: America's media bubble

...US foreign policy is being reflected through a blinding array of prisms. Yet America continues to pursue an analogue communications strategy in a digital age.

Just look at the satellite landscape. Here in the Middle East, we can watch more than 300 channels, from Hezbollah's al-Manar (labeled a terrorist organization by the United States) to Fox News (which, to borrow Fox's favorite line, "some people say" is the moral equivalent). Turkey, India, Singapore -- wherever you look overseas, all-news satellite channels are de rigueur. Tri lingual France 24 launches in a few weeks to bring "French values" to global coverage. China has a channel. Russia Today will soon broadcast in Arabic. Latin America now has a continent-wide all-news channel. Africans are also talking about one. And then, of course, there's the Internet.

The perspective of these channels is different. So is the spin. The American election was a big story here in the Middle East, but cheering Democrats shared the screen with gut-wrenching images of blood-drenched Palestinian children torn to shreds by Israel tank shells as they lay asleep in their beds. More of those "birth pangs of a new Middle East" that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice talked about last summer. Americans may be talking change, but Arabs, watching those scenes repeat endlessly through the day, saw business as usual...

I'm pretty sure there was a time when American-style educational institutions were meant to bring the American educational style and perspective to the Middle East, not give a venue for Americans to be proselytized by the Middle Eastern viewpoint.

Two words for Rupert Murdoch: FOX Arabic.

Charles Jacobs: Israel news on U.S. campuses

At The David Project: Israel news on U.S. campuses by Charles Jacobs:

Given the assaults on Israel this summer for its “disproportionate” response to Hezbollah attacks, many feared fall semester on campuses would be afire with anti-Israel campaigns. So far, it’s more like the usual, growing drumbeat: a few large anti-Western/anti-Israel events accompanied by a continuous drip, drip, drip of defamation – leaflets, posters, verbal sniping in classrooms, “academic” panels. Here’s a campus sampling:

Boston:

After Harvard opened the school year with a talk by a former Iranian President whose country promises to vaporize Israel with nuclear bombs, a church in Harvard Square followed up a few weeks later with the former PLO spokesman, now Columbia professor, Rashid Khalidi, who came to blame Israel for Palestinian woes. His far-left audience pushed the event toward full-assault mode. Over at MIT on Sept. 21, Noam Chomsky opened the season with an hour-long anti-Israel rant to a hall filled with breathless admirers. One of my staffers reported: “500 students prostrated themselves in front of him. The supposedly most influential intellectual in America said that the Israelis stage-managed their own trauma in Gaza … to get world sympathy … and not one of the best and brightest spoke up.”

Coming soon to Harvard’s Divinity School is a major hate-Israel fest. Entitled “Three Women, Three Faiths, One Shared Vision,” it’s sponsored by “The Pluralism Project.” The pluralism here will consist of Muslims, Christians and Jews blasting Israel. The Israeli speaker “finds inspiration in the growing movement of young Israelis who are refusing military service.”

Anti-Israelism often takes subtler forms. Moving south: At Brown University in an Arab language class, the professor referred to Israel as Palestine (something we hear is quite common) – until a Jewish student spoke up.

New York City:

At Queens College – A professor taught in her Intro Politics class that Palestinian suicide bombers are freedom fighters.
Columbia invited and then dis-invited (only “for security concerns”) Iran’s President Ahmadinejad – the one who wants to kill all the Jews in Israel – to speak at its World Leader’s Forum. Later, an “anti-war” coalition held a rally in the middle of College Walk to commemorate the sixth anniversary of the Intifada.

At SUNY Stony Brook – the Americans for Informed Democracy sponsored Ghazi Khankan, of CAIR (a hostile anti-Israel lobbying group) to it’s “Hope Not Hate: The Future of U.S.-Islamic World Relations.” The event turned into an Israel bash.

At CUNY Hunter College – there was a nice sized poster: Star of David=swastika

At NYU – A law school panel on the future of Hezbollah had a very negative spin against Israel.

If you are reading this report and have children or know students on these campuses, are you encouraging them to stand up for Israel, Jews and their community? Are you thinking that “this too shall pass” or tacitly hoping they take care of themselves, their grades, and their career paths? What will you do? When will you start? Pro-Israel groups have been preparing students for the campus battles. In the weeks ahead, this column will report on their observations and their struggles.

Iran unveils nuclear reactor upgrade plan while continuing its threats

Purely for peaceful purposes, of course...

Iran is set to upgrade its nuclear reactor capability by replacing its 5-megawatt reactor in Tehran with Arak's 40-megawatt heavy water research reactor, the Tehran Times reported.

The Iranian newspaper quoted the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran's Director Reza Aqazadeh as saying that "Tehran's reactor will be turned off by the time that Arak's reactor is started up."

Heavy water nuclear centers can be used to convert uranium into plutonium, for use in the production of nuclear weapons.

The "Arak research reactor is due for completion in 2009 and will make isotopes for medical, industrial, and other peaceful uses," the Tehran Times claimed.

Iran is also threatening the IAEA should they not help, while simultaneously attacking Israel diplomatically:

Iran has asked the International Atomic Agency for aid in setting up the Arak nuclear site, but Aqazadeh was quoted as saying that "the work on the Arak research reactor will continue whether the agency provides technical assistance or not."

"It will be more harmful to the agency if it refuses assistance," he warned.

Meanwhile, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Iran's Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki urged Arab and Muslim countries to "cut their diplomatic ties with Israel and avoid having any economic ties with Israeli corporations" on Saturday, the Iran Daily newspaper reported.

"A fair peace will not materialize in Palestinian territories, unless its original inhabitants take control of their country," the Iranian foreign minister said.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

Good time had by all...

...At tonight's blogger meetup/mini-Thanksgiving at the sea-side residence of the Sisu household. Good company, good food. Nice seeing the Technicalities, Neo-neocon, Augean Stables, Business of Life, and Miss Kelly families again...

In case you were wondering, yes, bloggers talk as much as they write...maybe more.

Thanks again to excellent hosts Sissy and Tuck!

John Bolton

UK: Extremist Muslims recruit in universities

The Telegraph reports:

Britain faces a sustained threat from extremist Islamic groups recruiting in British universities, the Government warned today.

Releasing new guidance designed to root out suspected terror cells, Bill Rammell, the higher education minister, said there was evidence that undergraduates were being "groomed" by groups infiltrating campuses disguised as ordinary students.

The document, released to all universities today, warns lecturers to be vigilant of students suspected of circulating extremist literature and extremist speakers visiting campuses.

It outlines a series of "scenarios" based on real events reported by university and college staff to illustrate the kind of threat being posed.

This includes a teacher who found pamphlets with titles such as "Who is a legitimate target?" and "From Jihad to a new world order" and a tutor who had been approached by students concerned about a speaker delivering a talk entitled "Terrorist or freedom fighter?"...

...Mr Rammell said: "This guidance provides a recognition - that I believe must be faced squarely - that violent extremism in the name of Islam is a real, credible and sustained threat to the UK, and that there is evidence of serious, but not widespread, Islamic extremist activity in higher education institutions."

He denied that it amounted to an attempt to target the Muslim community, but said that universities had to take "their responsibilities for the safety of their staff and students very seriously"...

...The British Muslim Forum, an umbrella group affiliated to almost 300 mosques, welcomed the guidance and said that the "radicalism of Muslim youths" on campuses needed to be tackled.

A spokesman said: "We would, however, strongly urge the Government to consider issuing similar guidance on tackling anti-Muslim extremism of the far right, as this would reinforce the Government's resolve to tackle all forms of extremism."

Universities UK also praised the guidance but said warnings should be "focussed on all kinds of extremism, not just on extremism in the name of Islam".

Friday, November 17, 2006

Israel developing anti-militant "bionic hornet" -- with bonus Reuters crap

This reminds me of some scenes from Chris Fox's excellent The Devil's Halo (available from Amazon, here):

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel is using nanotechnology to try to create a robot no bigger than a hornet that would be able to chase, photograph and kill its targets, an Israeli newspaper reported on Friday.

The flying robot, nicknamed the "bionic hornet," would be able to navigate its way down narrow alleyways to target otherwise unreachable enemies such as rocket launchers, the daily Yedioth Ahronoth said.

It is one of several weapons being developed by scientists to combat militants, it said. Others include super gloves that would give the user the strength of a "bionic man" and miniature sensors to detect suicide bombers.

The research integrates nanotechnology into Israel's security department and will find creative solutions to problems the army has been unable to address, Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres told Yedioth Ahronoth.

"The war in Lebanon proved that we need smaller weaponry. It's illogical to send a plane worth $100 million against a suicidal terrorist. So we are building futuristic weapons," Peres said.

The report is posted at Scientific American, but it's a Reuters re-print, so it can't help but force in the Jihadi spin:

The 34-day war in Lebanon ended with a U.N.-brokered ceasefire in mid-August. The war killed more than 1,200 Lebanese, mostly civilians, and 157 Israelis, mostly soldiers.

Talking back to Rachel Corrie's parents

Judith went to the play, and grasped hands with Rachel Corrie's mother:

...Mr and Mrs Corrie are just about the WASPiest WASPs you ever saw. They are very polite and well-groomed and caring. They are the American Gothic of the appeasement movement. They sincerely believe that they are - as Mr Corrie said - fighting for "the human rights of Israelis as well as Palestinians" by sadly tut-tutting over anything Israel does to kill terrorists or keep them from killing Israelis. **** Perhaps you have seen videos of really nutty moonbats like Ward Churchill or Noam Chomsky. Folks, what I saw Tuesday night is the soft sell, and it's way more scary...

Yikes.

The Syrian Border's a Sieve

Lebanese: Hizbullah getting arms

Lebanese civilians close to the border with Syria told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that weapons for Hizbullah were being brought in by the truckload at night. Lebanese Army troops on duty at the border refused to confirm the claims.

This correspondent watched as a line of trucks and lorries several kilometers long built up at one crossing on the road from Lebanon into Syria. The trucks, en route from Beirut to Damascus, were laden with a mixture of goods: everything from construction materials to fruits and vegetables. But in the late afternoon wintry chill they were stationary; their drivers had disappeared and only the occasional soldier kept guard every few hundred meters.

"They don't move in the day," said Yusuf Saad, a taxi driver waiting at the border crossing.

Saad, who had watched this correspondent from the other side of the road for some time before signaling for me to come over, added that "It's much easier for them to drive at night." He nodded toward the distant Syrian mountain range.

"There's not so much traffic on the road. And I can tell you" - his voice dropped to a conspiratorial whisper - "they might be going in with produce, but they're coming out with weapons. They hide the rockets under the goods and that's how they're able to bring them into the country."...

...Fifty-three year old electrician Hassan Taha, a strident Hizbullah supporter who lives opposite one of the areas the Israeli Air Force bombed last summer - a crater marks where a school, supermarket and hotel once stood - was emphatic, however. "Of course weapons are coming from the border," he said. "Everybody here knows that. They're coming from both Iran and Syria and also China and Russia. We need the weapons. We are ready now if Israel strikes us...

Not to worry, French UNIFIL troops are ready to shoot...at Israeli jets.

Germany refuses to alter Israel ties

Germany refuses to alter Israel ties

The German Embassy rejected on Thursday a call made by 25 German academics for the country to abandon its "special relationship" with Israel in favor of a stance recognizing Palestinian suffering as an outcome of the Holocaust...

...A German Embassy spokesman in Tel Aviv, however, dismissed the petition. "It in no way reflects the position of the German government. The position of the German government regarding the special relationship with Israel will not change."...

[h/t: isirota1965]

Arrested Massachusetts Imams Update

Miss Kelly has several interesting links concerning yesterday's item about the two Imams arrested on immigration fraud charges: Update on Religious Visa Fraud Charges in Boston. The Muslim American Society is calling for a show of support:

Plan to come out in a show of support for the imams on the hearing at the JFK Building on the third floor on Tuesday 8:30 AM. The more people that come, the stronger the message to officials that Muslims will not sit idly by and accept intimidation. More details of this will be sent soon.

Interview with Yigal Carmon of MEMRI

Very interesting stuff here. For instance:

Can't facts be manipulated? Isn't bias what we accuse our opponents of possessing?

I will answer that by way of a few revealing anecdotes.

In 1994-5, before MEMRI was formally established, I taped TV broadcasts of [Palestinian Authority chairman Yasser] Arafat calling for jihad [holy war].

The reaction to that tape was: "Kill the messenger."

Whose reaction was that?

Much of the Israeli media and politicians.
And I protested by saying, "But it's not me [calling for jihad]; it's him [Arafat]."
To which they replied, "That doesn't matter."

Then one day, I asked a very senior journalist with whom I was friendly, "Why are you criticizing our work? We're merely revealing the truth."
His reply is one I'll never forget: "There is no such thing as truth," he said. "Every news item must be judged by the question of whom it serves. And you are serving the enemies of peace."
Horrified, I retorted, "And you're the one who's considered the reliable journalist, while I'm seen as biased?"

So he said, "If you want to play na ve, do it with someone else, not with me. You know I'm right."
"No," I said. "I do not know that you're right. There is such a thing as truth, and it is impartial."

Subsequently, I encountered many expressions of his attitude. Journalist Dana Spector, for example. [Here he turns to a yellowed clipping from an old copy of the Hebrew daily, Yediot Aharonot, and reads it aloud]: "In fact, I didn't enter the field of journalism in order to report reality. Reality doesn't interest me at all."
Along the same lines, I once tried to show the Reuters bureau chief in Israel an item of interest. He was very personable and sympathetic, but said: "You don't have to show me the truth. There is no truth. There is only this side's version and that side's version."

Barnard Alumnae Opposing Tenure for Anthropologist Abu El Haj

The NY Sun reports that some alumnae aren't taking the dragging through the mud of their alma mater's name sitting down. (for background, see: Who's Coming Up For Tenure: Nadia Abu el-Haj): Barnard Alumnae Opposing Tenure for Anthropologist

A group of Barnard College alumnae is attempting to stop their alma mater from giving tenure to an assistant professor who minimizes Jews' historical connection to Israel.

In her 2001 book, "Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society," published by the University of Chicago, the professor of anthropology, Nadia Abu El-Haj says Israeli archaeology manipulates evidence to justify a modern Jewish state in the region.

Relying heavily on the input of anonymous archaeologists, tour guides, and tour participants, the book portrays Israeli archaeologists as ideologues who, driven by a desire to "efface Zionism's colonial dimension," have fabricated Jews' territorial claims to Israel...

...While "Facts on the Ground" has been warmly received by some biblical "minimalists," or "biblical revisionists" — academics who contend the Bible was written centuries later than is widely accepted and, that the text has little or no historical relevance — it has been widely dismissed by archaeologists as a political treatise, full of erroneous statements and unsubstantiated claims.

In "Facts on the Ground," Ms. Abu el-Haj suggests Jerusalem was destroyed not by the Romans, but by the Jews themselves due to rising class tensions among them. Yet, the 1st-century historian and scribe Josephus described in great detail the Roman siege of Jerusalem. Additionally, carvings in the Arch of Titus in Rome depict the Roman General Titus showing off menorahs and other objects looted from the Second Temple.

In another passage, Ms. Abu El-Haj relates how a tourist questions a Jerusalem tour guide's explanation that the Judean King Hezekiah saved the city from an Assyrian conquest in 701 B.C.E. The tourist refutes the statement, claiming that Hezekiah's actions actually led to the destruction of the nearby Israelite kingdom. "Although the tourist's objection would appear to undermine the guide's interpretation … this is a ludicrous claim, since the Israelite kingdom had been conquered twenty-one years earlier!" an archaeology professor at Israeli's Bar-Ilan University, Aren Maeir, wrote two years ago in a University of Chicago journal, Isis...

The Truth About Robert Spencer's Career

Clearly taqiyya to the max:

CartersSpencer

Rumor has it that Carter is being fingered to lead a fact-finding mission to Israel on behalf of the UN (see link). Perverse.

An Evening With an IDF Filmmaker -- Interesting and Disheartening

Yes, both interesting and disheartening.

Last night I attended a talk given by an filmmaker who's worked for over a decade within the Israel Defense Forces. His subject: "Israel in the Media; a question of Balance." I will leave the gentleman's name out of this description for the time being since my reaction is not 100% positive.

First the interesting stuff: Colonel X showed several minutes of film footage that I, as a blogger in this age where evidence of "fauxtography" is so in demand, was salivating to get my hands on -- think of the hits! We saw footage of Palestinian Arabs being instructed on how to pose for the cameras, an elderly woman being told to take up a more agonized pose next to some rubble, an old man sweeping up dust and admitting that the collapsed house he was standing next to wasn't his, and people being offered money for allowing pictures to be taken of themselves and their homes -- real juicy stuff demonstrating how the sausage is made...stuff that should be getting a much wider play.

Another very interesting point that he made was this: In feature film making, the ratio of raw footage shot (rushes) to what actually makes it on screen is around, say, 10:1. That is, for every 10 minutes of raw footage, about 1 minute makes it on screen. For documentary film making, this ratio of rushes to final cut jumps to say 150:1. In news film, this ratio skyrockets to 450 or more:1. Think of the manipulations that kind of editorial discretion allows for. Think of how micro-managed your access to the truth really is.

Col. X also lamented how difficult it has been to get the military minds of the IDF to understand how important the images they are unwitting players in are. Take, for instance, the scene of IDF troops up against a mob of stone-throwing youths. Col. X advises the Generals to bring along a fire engine with water canon -- this is crowd control, after all -- so that the press doesn't come away with images solely of fully-armed soldiers facing stone-throwing "youths." "Are you crazy?" the Generals say, "There are snipers behind those youths taking pot-shots at our guys, and you want that we should bring a water gun? We're the IDF, we have to look strong." Of course that's not the point. It doesn't matter if there's even water in the cannon...the snipers don't show up on video.

Likewise, the use of rubber bullets. The IDF often uses rubber bullets for sub-lethal crowd control, the trouble is, it looks the same as live ammo on camera. Suggestion: Give the guns that are firing rubber ammo some obvious distinguishing characteristic -- paint them blue or something. The Generals: "Are you crazy? Are you trying to make fools of us? We're the IDF, we don't run around with bright blue guns!" On and on...

That's the interesting...now the disheartening.

For all that Col. X's heart is in the right place, he still doesn't get it. Where to begin with this? Things started to get a bit "dodgy" during the question and answer session. It's not that there were any hostile questions, quite the opposite, and I can't tell you the questions and the answers specifically as the session was more of a conversation. Let me just give you a few impressions.

Col. X repeatedly stepped out from behind the podium and the microphone when he wanted to give an "I feel your pain (or, more to the point, an "I feel the Palestinians' pain") moment. He seemed stuck in that mind-set that says that if Israelis would just show how sensitive they really are, this would help turn world public opinion in their favor. The truth is, the other side takes this as nothing more than weakness and a chance to go for more. They take every mea culpa, not as a credit to Israeli humanity, but as an admission of Israeli guilt.

It's good to show honest concern for the genuine pain of all sides, but there is a level at which you overdo it and stop looking out for your own health. Col. X, and many others like him appear to be over that line.

Col. X referred at one point to the Al Durah case which readers should be well familiar with. He does not support efforts to expose the falsity of those images. "Yes, I know about the BU professor" and others..."Why re-open that wound?" quoth he. "We may not have killed that boy, but we certainly have killed others, I've seen it..so there is a sort of truth here..." It's a paraphrase, but I kid you not. The other side couldn't have made their point better.

The Colonel seems to have forgotten that Al Dura is already an open wound, that he played in the background as Daniel Pearl's throat was cut...THAT'S re-opening the wound. His image plays out in poetry, on billboards, on TV news, in terrorist videos...all for a lie. If there were other kids killed, and it really happened, and the issue comes up, FINE, tell the truth about it and do what needs to be done. Israel should never be afraid of the truth, but the only balm for this wound is to be honest about each case. It is astounding that a professional with images should be so cavalier about this.

And worse, by not sticking up for themselves, the Israelis leave all of their supporters hanging out to dry. For instance, in the first Al Dura decision, the French court repeatedly points to the reticence of Israeli authorities in protesting the veracity of the images as a reason why Karsenty must have been over the line in his accusations against France 2:

The numerous criticisms this theory has drawn, and the fact it has never been suggested or even mentioned by any official Israeli authority, merited even more caution, especially given that the criticisms came from parties that had not refrained from criticizing Charles Enderlin in the past on other issues.

The Lord helps those who help themselves. Israelis who won't argue their own case give those of us who know they have a good case to argue nothing to go on. This is truly infuriating.

Col. X in several instances mentioned the fact that Israel is now planning on uprooting 250,000 more citizens -- this time from the West Bank. Again, this was in the context of showing how much Israel is willing to sacrifice, how much credit they deserve. But will the meek of the earth like Col. X be ready to demand this credit? No, and they won't get it. It will be on to the next demand, have no doubt.

Look, before we go any further, let me stipulate for the court that I am not one of those "right wing ideologues" who sit from afar and demand maximal demands on the part of Israelis, encouraging them in wars or in sacrifices for which I bear no risk. If I thought uprooting 250,000 Israelis would bring true and lasting peace on earth and goodwill toward Man forever, I'd strap on my jackboots and drive the bulldozer through the synagogues myself -- and before you get too excited, if I thought that pushing all the Arabs out of the West Bank and constructing an iron wall on the opposite side of the Jordan River would achieve the same thing, I'd be for that too. The fact is, I don't believe a good case can be made for either.

But if you're going to be the kind of guy that is in favor of uprooting 250,000 people, you damn well better be the type of guy who's willing to scream for the credit you deserve, to demand the truth and the honesty you've been lacking in all cases. If you're not that kind of guy, you're the last person I'd want offering sacrifices.

I believe my position is the position of tens of millions of Americans who support Israel, not on absolutist religious grounds (I am not religious), but on practical grounds that simply translated say, "Israel is on the whole righteous and right, and stands on the front line of the war of the civilized against the uncivilized." It's not an easy place to be. When visiting the US Congress in 2003, Tony Blair said:

...We are fighting for the inalienable right of humankind--black or white, Christian or not, left, right or a million different--to be free, free to raise a family in love and hope, free to earn a living and be rewarded by your efforts, free not to bend your knee to any man in fear, free to be you so long as being you does not impair the freedom of others.

That's what we're fighting for. And it's a battle worth fighting.

And I know it's hard on America, and in some small corner of this vast country, out in Nevada or Idaho or these places I've never been to, but always wanted to go...

I know out there there's a guy getting on with his life, perfectly happily, minding his own business, saying to you, the political leaders of this country, "Why me? And why us? And why America?"

And the only answer is, "Because destiny put you in this place in history, in this moment in time, and the task is yours to do."

And our job, my nation that watched you grow, that you fought alongside and now fights alongside you, that takes enormous pride in our alliance and great affection in our common bond, our job is to be there with you.

You are not going to be alone. We will be with you in this fight for liberty.

We will be with you in this fight for liberty. And if our spirit is right and our courage firm, the world will be with us...

Any American could give any Israeli the same speech. Destiny and circumstance have placed Israel on the front line of an enormous battle, and this is one that doesn't always require guns to fight! Sometimes it just requires standing up for yourself, which in this case, happens to mean standing up for truth and honesty. Who could ask for a more righteous fight?

But we can do nothing for Israelis who won't help themselves. Some of us are going to finally figure out we have better things to do. We can't give respect to people who won't respect themselves.

Colonel X had a lot of good insights to share, and he would be a great guy to funnel information out to those of us in the alternative media who are dedicated to getting the truth out on his behalf. But please, less shirt-rending next time. His hesitations show why those of us out here have so much trouble getting even the most well-meaning of Israel's advocates to do the right thing on their own behalf.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

UCC-sponsored Terror-Art Show to Open Tonight

James Hutchins over at UCCTruths is still hopping mad at the United Church of Christ's sponsorship of an art exhibit featuring the work of incarcerated Puerto Rican (yes) terrorists:

The United Church of Christ's Art Exhibit "commemorating" the incarceration of terrorists Oscar Lopez Rivera and Carlos Alberto Torres opens tonight with a reception at 6pm in the Amistad Chapel at the UCC's National Office.

While the UCC has maintained that Rivera and Torres are political prisoners and that "their sentences were disproportionately long," the facts say otherwise. According to the United States Sentencing Commission, which analyzed this matter specifically, "the federal sentencing guidelines generally would call for sentences as long as or longer than those actually imposed, if the defendants had been sentenced under current law (in 1999)."

Specifically to Oscar Lopez Rivera, (an individual so "non-violent" that he wouldn’t renounce violence to get out of prison): In addition to crimes committed in furtherance of FALN goals, he plotted two escapes from federal prison. One was from Leavenworth Penitentiary and, according to a Victim Impact Statement, he "planned to blow up Fort Leavenworth with the most powerful plastic explosives known to the military, riddle guard towers with rounds from automatic weapons, and throw grenades in the path of those who pursued them. To achieve their goals, Lopez considered killing the inmates who threatened Richard Cobb, killing George Lebosky after they became suspicious of him, and killing firearms dealer Michael Neece to gain his weapons." He set in motion plans to obtain the following for his escape attempt: fragmentation grenades, smoke grenades, phosphorus grenades, eight M-16 rifles, two silencers, 50 pounds of plastic C-4 explosives, eight bulletproof vests, ten blasting caps to use with plastic explosives, 100 thirty-shot clips to use with automatic weapons. In Lopez’ probation officer’s assessment, "[Lopez’] level of remorse, rehabilitation and positive regard for this court’s process is minimal, if not nonexistent. He demonstrates a sustained consistent commitment to the use of violence and weapons. He will use any means to gain freedom for the purpose of undermining the principles of the United States government. He has already determined that human life is expendable for this purpose."

This is what we are commemorating today.

Imagine if you will, that the UN, the US and world opinion were to decide that Lopez and company were the sole "legitimate representatives of the Puerto Rican peoples," that they took them out of jail, put them back in PR, gave them money, guns, uniforms and recognition, and further, that Lopez and company ran media in Puerto Rico, the police, the public works...the schools...what would Puerto Rican society come to look like? Just a little thought experiment for you.

Visa Fraud at Boston Mosques - Update

Kudos to the Federal immigration authorities for enforcing the law here: Two Massachusetts imams accused in immigration scheme

Federal immigration agents arrested imams from two Boston-area mosques Wednesday, alleging they were involved in a scheme that provided religious worker visas to immigrants who used them to enter the United States and work instead as gas station attendants, truck drivers, and factory laborers.

Hafiz Abdul Hannan, imam, or leader, of the Islamic Society of Greater Lowell in Chelmsford, and Muhammed Masood, imam, or leader, of the Islamic Center of New England in Sharon, were among 33 people taken into custody nationwide after a multi-year investigation led by agents in Boston and New York, said Paula Grenier, a spokeswoman for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

"‘This was a nationwide religious worker visa fraud scheme designed to help illegal aliens," said Grenier. "These people had to be solely engaged in religious employment, and in many cases were not."

Under the Religious Worker Program, started in 1990, churches, synagogues, and mosques can ask the government to approve visas for foreigners to fill vacant positions. Each year, several thousand visas are issued each year that permit immigrants to enter the United States exclusively for religious employment. To obtain the visa, immigrants must have religious training and experience in their native country. Once here, they are not allowed to hold secular jobs. The religious worker permits can ultimately lead to green cards, or permanent residency.

Under the scheme, described by federal authorities, the immigrants, who were mostly Pakistani, paid a fee to US religious organizations, which then sponsored them for the visas. Some of those arrested did legitimate religious work, but had filed false paperwork to win their own visas, or once here, to sponsor others, said Grenier. Because the investigation is ongoing, she would not say whether the imams are alleged to have sponsored the visas for others or violated their own visas by working secular jobs.

Miss Kelly notes a similar scheme at a Brooklyn Mosque.

Reminds me of the message that came across the Muslim American Society email list about a pregnant woman who had decided to have her baby in the USA, was intending to hop on a place when she was near term and was looking for hospital recommendations...anchors from the Middle East.

Update: The Muslim American Society...and the ACLU...are most cross (from a forwarded email):

The Muslim community in Boston is deeply concerned and outraged due to the recent arrests of two leading Imams in the Greater Boston community on alleged administrative violations of immigration policies.

Imam Hafiz Masood has been a long-standing leader and Imam of the Islamic Center of New England (ICNE), based in Sharon, MA. “He has always been a voice of peace and wisdom and I hope that immigration officials will be sensitive to his leadership position in the community, and ensure that appropriate measures are taken to bring a fair and speedy resolution to this issue," said Hossam AlJabri, President of the Muslim American Society, Boston Chapter.

“He is deeply respected in the Muslim community and we stand strongly behind him and his family in this difficult time,” said Mohiudeen Khan, President of the Board of ICNE.

Imam Masoud's lawyer in the past had ensured ICNE that Masood's immigration papers are perfectly in order and that he is legally clear to work in the US. Imam Masoud and his family are applying for residency status in the US.
Imam Abdul Hannan from the Islamic Society of Greater Lowell has also served the Muslim community in Lowell as Imam for several years. His arrest has also drawn concern amongst Muslims as well as immigration and civil rights groups since it is seen as another strike against a community already beleaguered by law enforcement activity.
"On the surface this appears to be yet another action unfairly targeting the local Muslim community" said Nancy Murray, Director of the Boston ACLU's Civil Liberties Task Force. "We're looking forward to getting more information."

Masood's lawyer, the Honorable William Joyce said: I'm extremely troubled by the way this came about, and I believe that Imam Masood and Abdul Hannan will both be vindicated. The way this all came about is a disgrace. They (immigration officials) wouldn't go to the Cardinal's residence and arrest him for an immigration technicality."
The charges against Imam Masood amount basically to an administrative immigration technicality, leading Ibrahim Ramey from MAS Freedom Foundation to comment, “Indiscriminate arrest of Muslim leaders for trivial and non-criminal offenses can only serve to erode the relationship between the Muslim community and law enforcement community. It hurts the cause of civil rights, and further polarizes society.”

MAS Boston president Hossam AlJabri along with community leaders will be meeting with immigration officials tonight to get more information about the case and will demand that charges and evidence be made public to the Boston community and that the issue be resolved in a fair and speedy manner.

Action Requested

1. Pray for the safe and speedy release of both Imams.
2. Contact your local representative and MA Senators, (a) to inform them of the situation, (b) ask them to help ensure the fair, speedy, and respectable treatment of the Imams...

...etc...

German and Austrian Intellectuals Ask for Review of Relationship with Israel

European Intellectuals Ask for Review of Relationship with Israel

Leading German and Austrian intellectuals called their countries to review the special relationship established with Israel following the Holocaust.

A group of German and Austrian scientists and intellectuals, including Professor Udo Steinbach, Professor Jorg Becker and Eric Schmidt Engboom issued a proposal titled “Manifesto of the 25.”

European intellectuals voiced their opposition to the special relationship between Germany and Israel, defined as unconditional support for its existence and welfare due to the Holocaust, even if Israel violated international law and human rights.

The manifesto cited one of the “unnoticed” results of the Holocaust as the Palestinian issue and emphasized the Palestinian people played no part in the emergence of the Middle East crisis...

Sounds like the big brains need to study a little more history.

[h/t: Adam Holland]

Indonesia Fined for Not Playing With Jews

Good for the International Tennis Federation: ITF fines Indonesia for canceling July tennis match in Israel

The International Tennis Federation has fined Indonesia $31,600 and banned it from next year's tournament for canceling its July Fed Cup match against Israel in Ramat Hasharon.

The Indonesian Tennis Association is expected to appeal against the ruling before the December 20 deadline, Ferry Raturandang, secretary general of the ITA said Thursday.

The Muslim nation, which has no diplomatic relations with Israel, had asked that the venue of its World Group II playoff match be moved to another country.

Raturandang said the decision was made over security concerns, and not politically motivated, as alleged by the ITF. But Indonesian foreign ministry officials said that the government had instructed its national team to pull out of the July 15-16 Fed Cup match in protest over Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip, after initially consenting for the team to travel to Israel.

Raturandang said Indonesia was told it must pay $5,000 for pulling out of the match; $6,600 to compensate the ITF's spending on preparations for the Israel Fed Cup, and US$20,000 to host Israel.

Indonesia was in the World Group II playoffs this year, but the sanction relegates the country to Group II of the Asia/Oceanic Zone in 2008, he said.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Britain's Problem

Telegraph: Hate videos of Muslim group they failed to ban

A Muslim organisation which the Government chose not to ban is preaching hatred and has infiltrated the Home Office, an investigation has revealed.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is showing inflammatory videos to small groups of followers then encouraging them to attack non-believers.

An HuT member has gained a job as an information technology worker in the Immigration and Nationality Directorate of the Home Office and been given a grant to organise an event for the radical group, it has been claimed in an undercover investigation by Vigil, a group campaigning against religious extremism.

In a mocked-up video shown to new recruits, a woman interrogator at Guantanamo Bay was shown wiping blood over the face of a prisoner to make him confess. A student in his twenties, who posed as a recruit to HuT, said: "The reaction was shocking.

"The group were clenching their fists and shouting, 'We'll kill her, how can you do this to our brothers? F****** kuffars [non-believers]."

"Afterwards the mushrif [leader] asked for our opinions and people seemed to think the British were the same, they were saying, 'A kuffar is a kuffar and f****** British troops, we have to do something.'

"They said, 'we have to attack from the inside' and I think they meant terror attacks."

The young man, who is known as Jay - not his real name – was forced to rob three people to show his loyalty to the group.

The group, which met at West Croydon Mosque, comprised five black and Asian men, aged between 18 and 28, most of them unemployed and four of them converts. Each group had a number and theirs was in the fifties. "They were thugs," said Jay, who spent six months with them.

Jay said the group were shown DVDs on three occasions, each accompanied by a talk by the mushrif...

Samir Ubeid, an Iraqi Researcher Living in Europe [on Al Jazeera]: The Nobel Prize Is Racist and Stems from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion

jazeeraprotocols

MEMRITV: Samir Ubeid, an Iraqi Researcher Living in Europe: The Nobel Prize Is Racist and Stems from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Following are excerpts from an interview with Samir 'Ubeid, an Iraqi researcher living in Europe, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on October 31, 2006:

...Samir 'Ubeid:...Mother Teresa was brought, along with a group of people like her…

Interviewer: Some say the prize was awarded to her for her missionary activity in Africa, India, and so on...

Samir 'Ubeid: Let’s assume she was righteous, according to the logic of the media, which is now controlled by the Jews and Hollywood. When they awarded the prize to Teresa, they were trying to award an "artificial hymen" or "artificial honor" to this prize. My colleague said that there is democracy. What democracy is there, if out of 1.5 billion Chinese, only two or three were awarded the Nobel? If you examine the Russian scientists and writers, who shook the world with their literature and their knowledge... What about Sakharov, what about Tolstoy? In addition...

Interviewer: But Sakharov was awarded the Nobel prize.

Samir 'Ubeid: I meant Chekhov. Chekhov! Chekhov! ...

...Are we Arabs not included in the transfer of the scientific genetic code? We, the descendants of Al-Khawarizmi, Al-Jahez, Al-Razi, Avicenna, and Ibn Al-Haytham – are we all born idiots? Is there not a single scientist among us? Are we not included in the genetic code? Is intelligence not transferred down among us Arabs?

Interviewer: Scientific creativity occurs in freedom and democracy, brother.

Samir 'Ubeid: Democracy does not explain how it was awarded to 167 Jews, from among those 15 million scattered around the world, while abandoning 1.5 billion Chinese, a billion Indians, and 380 million Arabs. This is racism...

...The [Grameen] bank for the poor won the prize because some of its shareholders are giants like Haliburton and others...

...They infiltrated this bank, which became in the pocket of the Freemasons. This prize stems from the core of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Al Jazeera is on its way to America.

Roman shipwreck delights archaeologists

Cool: Roman shipwreck delights archaeologists

A shipwrecked first-century vessel carrying delicacies to the richest palates of the Roman Empire has proved a dazzling find, with nearly 2,000-year-old fish bones still nestling inside clay jars, archaeologists said Monday.

Boaters found its cargo of hundreds of amphoras in 2000 when their anchor got tangled with one of the two-handled jars.

After years of arranging financing and crews, exploration of the site off the coast of Alicante in southeast Spain began in July, said Carles de Juan, a co-director of the project, who works for the Valencia regional government.

The ship is estimated to have been 30 meters (100 feet) long with capacity for around 400 tons of cargo. That would make it twice the size of most other Roman shipwrecks found in the Mediterranean, de Juan said in an interview with the Associated Press.

The freight was an estimated 1,500 well-preserved clay amphoras, or two-handled jars, used in this case to hold fish sauce -- a prized condiment for wealthy Romans, he said.

For centuries the meter-tall amphoras lay undisturbed except for an occasional octopus that would pry one open, breaking the ceramic-and-mortar seal in search of food or shelter...

Khaled Abu Toameh: Audio

Here is the audio of a CAMERA-sponsored talk given this past November the 6th in Boston by incomparable Jerusalem Post correspondent Khaled Abu Toameh. Enjoy.

Ben-Dror Yemini: “And the World is Lying” - The Plight of the Refugees

Ben Dror Yemini's last article was a lengthy must-read that attempted to set the record straight on the huge numbers of Arabs and Muslims killed in various conflicts around the world and their juxtapose them with the relatively tiny number killed in wars against Israel -- though the former looms huge in significance and imagination: And the world is silent

This, Yemini's second must-read tackles the special status of Palestinian refugees. Here is the article at Maariv in Hebrew. Gadi Taub has a short review, here.

Someone has forwarded me an English translation of the article, and I have included it in the entry below in full. As far as I can tell, this is its first appearance in English. Due to its length, and for issues of readability, I have not pasted it in blockquote style. Everything below this paragraph is quoted material. Do read.

"And the World is Lying" - The Plight of the Refugees

Ben-Dror Yemini
1 Oct. 2006

This article is the second in a series of investigations of the unique standards applied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by the international community and world media. Part I of the series ("And the World is Silent" - 22 Sept. 2006) dealt with the world's silence in response to mass murders by Arabs of their fellow Arabs and Moslems. That silence is of particular significance in light of the constantly reiterated charge that Israel is implementing genocidal policies vis-à-vis the Palestinians. As we demonstrated, the number of Palestinian casualties inflicted by Israel is trivial compared to the magnitude of casualties inflicted in other ethnic or religious conflicts around the globe.

Part II focuses on the unique treatment of Palestinian refugees compared with the refugees generated by other ethnic and religious conflicts over the course of the last century. Let us begin with a well-known story. In a country that formerly belonged to the Ottoman Empire, a Moslem minority continues to reside. There is no love lost between the majority and minority populations, and long history of conflict. Eventually the majority population forces large numbers of the minority Moslem population to flee to a neighboring country with a majority Moslem population.

No, this story is not about Israel and the Palestinians. It is the story of the Moslem Turks in Bulgaria. Nor is it a story from 200 years ago. It took place at the end of the 1980's. Three hundred thousand Moslems were pressured to flee Bulgaria.

If the reader has never heard of any discussion of the "right of return" of ethnic Turks to Bulgaria, or of any international organizations devoted to their plight, the explanation is simple: they are not Palestinians. Nor is the case of ethnic Turks in Bulgaria an isolated one. In the course of the last century, tens of millions of people fled their native lands in the wake of religious or ethnic conflict.

Were the world to impose a "right of return" similar to that advocated for the Palestinians to other instances of population transfer, millions of Moslems would be permitted to return to India and millions of Hindus to Pakistan. Entire populations of the Balkan states would have to be reshuffled.

Yet no international body advocates the return of Moslems to Greece or Bulgaria or ethnic Greeks to Turkey. And for a very good reason: Doing so would only reopen bitter past conflicts and lead to rivers of blood.

Only with respect to the Palestinians does the world harp on the "right of return." Different rules apply to God's little acre, which just happens to be the acre of the Jews. Rules developed for other nations that have been the subject of mass population transfers - India, Pakistan, Turkey, Greece, Czechoslovakia, and dozens of others - suddenly no longer apply when it comes to Israel.

Entire international organizations deal with just one group of the last century's refugees - the Palestinians. An entire international bureaucracy and a worldwide propaganda campaign is devoted not to alleviating the plight of Palestinian refugees but to perpetuating it. Some support the Palestinian "right of return" out of good-hearted naiveté. But many others have a different agenda. Their purpose is not the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but the destruction of Israel. As one of Yasser Arafat's closest advisors, Sahar Habash, once commented, "The right of return is our winning lottery ticket for the destruction of Israel."

Who is a Refugee?

The "right of return" is just one example of the ways in which Palestinian refugees are treated differently from other war refugees. Nowhere is this more clearly illustrated than by the existence of two U.N. bodies for dealing with refugees - the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) deals exclusively with Palestinians; the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) is charged with responsibility for all other refugees around the globe. The mission of the UNHCR is to assist refugees to begin a new life As a consequence of its activities tens of millions of former refugees are no longer classified as "refugees" when they gain citizenship in their new host countries.

By contrast, not a single Palestinian has ever lost his refugee status. There are hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees or their descendants who are citizens of Jordan. Yet as far as UNRWA is concerned they are still refugees.

Continue reading "Ben-Dror Yemini: “And the World is Lying” - The Plight of the Refugees"

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Reuters Photographer: I was just holding it for a friend!

Qalqilya: Reuters photographer arrested for possessing stolen goods

Police arrested a Reuters photographer from Qalqilya on suspicion that he possessed stolen goods.

According to suspicions, the man, 34, sells stolen electronic goods in his Qalqilya store, where 50 laptops, 8 digital cameras, 40 video camera and 15 palm pilots were seized. The goods were stolen from Israeli households in the Sharon area. (Raanan Ben-Zur)

Jumblatt: Democrat win paves way for Mideast 'chaos'

Tough times ahead for minorities and anyone looking to buck the rising tide in the Middle East...Don't expect a lot of people to be sticking their necks out for awhile.

Democrat win paves way for Mideast 'chaos' - Lebanese leader fears emboldened Hezbollah will provoke violence

The Democrats' midterm election victories last week and the subsequent resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld sent a message of American weakness to Syria that will likely result in "instability and chaos" in Lebanon and other parts of the Middle East, Lebanon's Druze Leader Walid Jumblatt said in a WND interview today.

Jumblatt is head of Lebanon's Progressive Socialist Party and is widely considered the most prominent anti-Syrian Lebanese politician.

He charged the Democrats' calls for a withdrawal from Iraq and for changes in U.S. Middle East policy in part emboldened the Syrian-backed Hezbollah militia to bolt the Lebanese parliament this past weekend and to threaten street protests that many say could easily turn violent...

Did FOX Pay $2 Million to Free Centani and Wiig?

So says WorldNetDaily: Fox News reporters freed for $2 million - Terrorists used cash for arms to 'hit Zionists,' payment said to encourage more abductions

JERUSALEM – Palestinian terror groups and security organizations in the Gaza Strip received $2 million from a United States source in exchange for the release of Fox News employees Steve Centanni and Olag Wiig, who were kidnapped here last summer, a senior leader of one of the groups suspected of the abductions told WND.

The terror leader, from the Gaza-based Popular Resistance Committees, said his organization's share of the money was used to purchase weapons, which he said would be utilized "to hit the Zionists."

He said he expects the payments for Centanni and Wiig's freedom will encourage Palestinian groups to carry out further kidnappings.

Officials associated with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party and its security organization, the Preventative Security Services, confirmed to WND money was paid for the release of the Fox News reporters.

A senior leader of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, the declared "military wing" of Fatah, said the group received a small percentage of the $2 million, which all parties interviewed said was transferred in cash...

...Members of the Dugmash clan lead the "Saladin resistance department" of the Popular Resistance Committees, an umbrella of Palestinian terror groups which previously carried out anti-U.S. attacks, including the bombing in 2003 of a U.S. convoy in Gaza in which three American government contractors were killed. The Committtees is also responsible for scores of anti-Israel shooting attacks and bombings and for a large number of rocket attacks against Jewish communities near Gaza.

The senior leader of the Committees, speaking to WND on condition of anonymity, would not say whether members of his group carried out the Fox News kidnappings, but he admitted the Committees received money for "aiding" in the release of Centanni and Wiig.

The terror leader said $2 million cash was transferred to the Preventative Security Services, the main Fatah security forces in Gaza, for distribution to various parties.

He said the largest portion of the money was provided to the Committees' Dugmash clan, which Israeli security officials say is heavily involved in the smuggling of weapons and drugs into Gaza and which openly has led anti-Israel terror attacks on behalf of the Popular Resistance Committees. The Committees leader would not provide the exact sum transferred to the clan, but said it exceeded $1 million...

Reversing the Angle to get the Straight Truth

Kudos to Bruno Stevens for showing how a photographer can correct the print media's possibly willful mistakes by speaking out and emptying the drawer of more pictures from different angles to show the truth of the thing.

LGF has the scoop from this Lightstalkers thread: The Media Are the Enemy

Charles remarks:

You’re not going to believe this one.

All our suspicions about mainstream media slanting and distorting the news from the Middle East are confirmed in a bombshell of a post by Bruno Stevens, at the Lightstalkers pro photographers’ forum: The Lebanon ‘garbage dump’ story: complete explanation. (Hat tip: Snapped Shot.)

His photograph, published by both US News and World Report and Time Magazine, had a caption describing the scene as the wreckage of an Israeli jet shot down by Hizballah. In this post, Stevens reveals that the captions he sent in with his pictures described the scene accurately—but editors at the magazines changed the captions to completely alter the story...

Photographer Bruno Stevens:

...Now, once and for all, this place is NOT a garbage dump. It is the back entry and parking lot of large Lebanese Army barracks in Kfar Chima, in the eastern outskirts of Beirut. A series of yellow barracks building can be seen behind the Hezbollah fighter on the picture published by TIME; below is another picture from the scene that clearly shows de-commissioned Lebanese Army trucks as well as a mirador from the base northern gate...

...

This is a very important piece of evidence showing probable collusion between Hezbollah and the Lebanese Army, there is little doubt that the Lebanese Army was aware of the presence of at least one missile launcher and at least one large missile on their parking lot. The size of the launcher, destroyed a couple of days later from the ground by an unknown party suggest missiles 10 to 14 meters long.

There were 6 to 8 large articulated trucks parked there, making it a very legitimate target for the Israeli Air Force, quite far away from civilian houses...

Check out both threads. 

The Eastern Way of War

MEMRITV: Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps Commander Yahya Safavi: We Have Thousands of Martyrdom-Seekers; We Can Give Missiles to Friendly and Neighboring Countries

...We do not rely only on defense technology. The IRGC has thousands of martyrdom-seekers, who have gained military experience during the eight years of war, and these martyrdom-seekers are prepared to carry out martyrdom operations on large scales. They operate professionally, and have undergone training. They have a strong spirit of martyrdom.

Students Confronting Apartheid in Israel at Stanford?

Some students are pushing back: Op-Ed: What apartheid is and is not

How would you react if a Stanford student organization announced the establishment of a new group called Students Confronting British Nazism, or Students Confronting Women’s Blame for Rape? Or how about Students Confronting African American Inferiority? Anyone with a moral bone in his body would clearly be flooded by feelings of incredulity, followed by outrage. Why? Because these group names not only assert a blatant lie, they are also deeply offensive and dangerous. The British are no Nazis, women are never to blame for rape and African Americans are not “inferior” to anyone. The purpose of such a group would be purely negative — its very ambition to dehumanize and delegitimize an entire group of people. Surely no Stanford student organization would stoop so low, right?

Wrong! By announcing last week that it was creating a new group called Students Confronting Apartheid in Israel — and launching a series of assaults accusing Israel of institutionalized racism, the Stanford student organization Coalition for Justice in the Middle East (CJME) — demonstrated that when it comes to the Jewish people, even the most abusive and pernicious lies are fair game on campus...

...CJME’s actions are not only based on a spiteful myth, they are also dangerous. Racism is the 21st century’s scarlet letter: Once branded racist, you’re an outcast. Those who attempt to label Israel an “apartheid state” are in effect campaigning against co-existence and peace. Does one co-exist with apartheid? No. Does one make peace with apartheid? Of course not, because to do so would be morally wrong. By establishing the new group, CJME hopes that the repetition of the rhetoric of demonization (“apartheid,” “genocide,” “racism”) will come to be accepted as truth, creating an atmosphere of intimidation for Jewish students and animosity toward Israel.

Ah, but what about free speech? While even hate propaganda may be protected speech, this does not mean that it is acceptable to spread offensive lies on campus. Would we tolerate a Stanford student organization whose sole purpose is to trash any other religious, ethnic or gender-based community? Our culture of respect and diversity makes this normatively unacceptable....

[H/T: Denis]

Today in Somerville: Bugging the crap out of an entire community

Questions 5 and 6 ("Right of Return" and divestment) lost handily in Somerville in last week's vote. But Ron Francis's Somerville Divestment Project is still hard at work. You see, you only need 50 signatures and you, too, can force the board of aldermen to meet.

Today's the big day, and at 6:45, the board of aldermen will be meeting at City Hall at the behest of Ron's SDP.

Here's the robo call that Somerville residents have been receiving, coming in from Ron Francis's phone number (hear it and believe it -- it's short):

Robo Audio from Ron.

Apparently, community activism means never taking no for an answer, as well as bugging the shit out of people at home. My advice: Go to City Hall and tell the SDP to leave you the hell alone, and tell the aldermen you support them telling the SDP to take a hike.

MAS Watch: You are what you protest

Let's take a look at what everyone's favorite interfaith dialog partners, and principals behind the multi-million dollar Boston Mosque project are pushing on their moderated email list:

First we have a press release trumpeting the arrest of Mahdi Bray...for what? Read on: MAS Leader Arrested in White House Protest

Imam Bray, Taken Into Custody during Israeli Prime Minister's Visit; Calls for End to U.S. Support of Killings in Gaza

WASHINGTON, DC - Nov. 13, 2006 (MASNET) After stating to a spirited interfaith group of more than 30 protesters that " there comes a time when silence is betrayal", MAS Freedom Foundation's Executive Director Mahdi Bray committed civil disobedience in front of the White House and was taken into custody by U.S. federal police officials in Washington D.C on Monday, November 13th.

The arrest was the culmination of a MAS-organized protest against the visit to the White House by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The Israeli leader is reportedly seeking support from Washington for continued attacks against the population of Gaza and possible Israeli military action against Iran in response to the Iranian nuclear program.The demonstration, organized by the Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation was joined by members of the Muslim community in Virginia and Washington, D.C., and other long-time activists for justice for the people of Palestine. About a dozen members of the Neturai Karta Orthodox Jewish community, including their leader, Rabbi Dovid Weiss, also joined in the protest [Naturei Karta are the extremist sect known for such things as visiting Ahmahdinejad and telling him to keep up the good work (seriously) -S] and expressed their condemnation of the Israeli occupation of Palestine and especially the recent attacks on Gaza civilian areas that have resulted in scores of civilian casualties...

...Ayyub Hanif of the MAS Freedom Foundation was one of several protesters who lead the chant of "Free Free Palestine" and "No Justice, No Peace."...

In another message, they recommend checking out this Yahoo calendar for a series of events to attend:

1. Palestine-Israel Impasse? 11/13 and 11/14 by Ali Abunimah.
2. Somerville divestment project Town hall Meeting 11/14.
3. Vigil at the Harvard Memorial church 11/15.
4. Protest at the Israeli consulate 11/16.
5. Rachel’s words coming to Boston 11/16.
6. Ethnic Cleansing in Palestine by Ilane Pappe 11/17.
7. Beyond apartheid conference 11/1

Your partners in interfaith, your local moderates.

A few words about that first event with Ali Abunimah:

Tired of hearing talking heads go on about a Palestine-Israel Impasse? Come hear one man SOLUTION!

Monday November 13th - 7 pm
First Parish Unitarian Universalist Church
3 Church Street, Cambridge
(Harvard Square)

and

Tuesday November 14th - 4:30 pm
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Weiner Auditorium, Taubman Building

(Harvard Square)

Event on Monday co-sponsored by Unitarian Universalists for Justice in the Middle East -Greater Boston Chapter, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC-MA), the Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights (BCPR), United for Justice with Peace Israel-Palestine Task Force and Jewish Voices for Peace - Boston.

Event on Tuesday co-sponsored by Palestine Awareness Committee (KSG), Alliance for Justice in the Middle East (FAS), Justice for Palestine (HLS), Harvard Society of Arab Students (FAS), and the Palestine Solidarity Committee (FAS).

One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse

Will the Palestine-Israeli conflict ever be resolved in a way that will finally bring peace to the region? Noted expert on the topic and the son of Palestinians who fled the country in 1948, author Ali Abunimah makes the radical argument that what is needed is one state shared by Palestinians and Israelis. His book in which he lays out his controversial approach was just published this fall by Metropolitan Books.

More urgent than ever, ONE COUNTRY is a provocative and visionary approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and one that is certain to cause a stir on all sides...

Ah yes, the controversial new approach that will have everyone buzzing is...wait for it...dismantling Israel! A real shocker from the founder of Electronic Intifada, endorsed by our friends at the Muslim American Society.

By the way, Abunimah is on quite a whirlwind-tour. On Thursday he'll be at Columbia, with introductory remarks by Joseph Massad.

Top Five Musicals

Bit late in this, but there it is. Top five musicals of all time? My list (without overthinking the thing):

An American in Paris
Singin’ in the Rain
Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
Fiddler on the Roof
Little Shop of Horrors

I'd almost put Camelot on the list, but the truth of it is that Vanessa Redgrave (in the film version) is too much of a distraction (and not in the way she should be)...one wants to keep politics out of these things, but there is a certain line that, when crossed, smudges the art.

Norm received 106 entries in his poll. You can hop on over there and see the final results.

(Feel free to add your own in the comments.)

Monday, November 13, 2006

On eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month...

World War 1-era vet Robley Rex, who knew Veteran's Day when it was still Armistice Day, is still alive and spry (see previous: Veterans fading -- and coming home and 105 and Going Strong). Thanks to Joseph Major for forwarding this picture of Mr. Rex taken on the 11th day +1 (yesterday):

IMG_0026

Best wishes to living history, Robley Rex.

Talking to Hizballah

Very interesting stuff at Michael J. Totten's blog as a member of Hizballah shows up in the comments to debate. Lot's of talk about martyrs and reclaimed honor...also articulate, well-traveled and read with plenty of experience in the West.

It's not about "understanding each other" or dialogs, or student exchanges...it's about incompatible cultural paradigms.

U.S. Vetoes Security Council Resolution Assailing Israel for Attacks (Confirm John Bolton)

Sometimes it's right to be unilateral:

The United States vetoed a Security Council resolution on Saturday that condemned Israel for its military actions in Gaza and called for an immediate withdrawal of Israeli forces from the area.

The United States ambassador, John R. Bolton, told the Council that the resolution “does not display an even-handed characterization of the recent events in Gaza, nor does it advance the cause of Israeli-Palestinian peace.”

The resolution, introduced by Qatar, the Arab representative on the Council, had been amended during two days of negotiations to meet objections that it was not balanced. But Mr. Bolton said it remained “in many places biased against Israel and politically motivated.”

In the vote, 4 countries abstained — Britain, Denmark, Japan and Slovakia — and 10 were in favor — Argentina, China, Congo, France, Ghana, Greece, Peru, Russia, Qatar and Tanzania.

The original draft had made no mention of Palestinian rocket strikes into Israel and accused Israel of conducting a “massacre” of civilians in its attack at Beit Hanun on Wednesday that killed 18 civilians.

New language was inserted condemning the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel and calling upon the Palestinian Authority to take “immediate and sustained action” to end the rocket fire. But while the resolution named Israel as liable for the attacks on Gaza, it was silent on who or what group was responsible for the attacks on Israel.

In other changes, a reference to “indiscriminate” Israeli violence became “disproportionate” violence, and the words “military assault,” “aggression” and “massacre” were dropped in favor of the general phrase “military operations.”

Another provision had proposed that a new United Nations observer force be sent into the area to monitor a cease-fire, but it was substituted with language suggested by France that called for the creation of “an international mechanism for the protection of civilians.”

Mr. Bolton said the United States considered this “a promise which is unwise and unnecessary and which, at any rate, raises false hopes.”...

MEMRITV: Khaled Hadadeh, Secretary-General of Lebanese Communist Party: We Hope Our Fighters Manage to Capture an Israeli Soldier

dumbcommie

I recall hearing theories that the decline of the Roman Empire was caused, in part at least, by lead poisoning on a massive scale from the lead-lined casks used to transport wine...which begs the question...what are some of these guys in Lebanon drinking? (video at the link)

Khaled Hadadeh, Secretary-General of Lebanese Communist Party: We Hope Our Fighters Manage to Capture an Israeli Soldier

...Our party, which supported the heroic capturing operation, supports further operations like it, in order to liberate our prisoners, especially Samir Al-Quntar...

...Our party hopes very much that its fighters will manage to capture an Israeli soldier. This would be a great honor...

...We support the efforts of the democratic lawyers in Lebanon to establish an international court – either official or independent – in order to place on trial the president of the U.S.A., members of his administration, and the leaders of the Zionist enemy as war criminals, for the massacres perpetrated against our people during the recent aggression...

Sunday, November 12, 2006

Call it What it is: Jew Hatred [at Andover High School]

The Valley Patriot unloads with both barrels:

The anti-Semitic hate group “Wheels of Justice” was recruited to speak to the children of Andover High School by their equally anti-Semitic physics teacher, Ron Francis. And when the principal canceled the group’s visit because no opposing views were being represented, these so-called “peace activists” had to be escorted out of the building by police because they refused to leave “peacefully.”

Now, Francis and Andover Teachers’ Union President Tom Meyers are threatening a lawsuit, saying they do not want opposing views represented. (So much for freedom of speech!)

But who can oppose peace and love? A quick trip to the Web site www.justicewheels.org reveals that Wheels of Justice is a group which seeks to “educate” people on the evils of the United States and Israel. They seek to educate people about the Jewish conspiracy in this country to support Israel. They portray America and the Jews as the root cause of all the violence and turmoil in the Middle East. In short, they cloak themselves under the cover of being “anti-Israel,” but not anti-Semites or anti-Jewish.

Furthermore, Wheels of Justice claims that Israel committed “ethnic cleansing” against Palestinians, that the Jews are “illegally” occupying land and oppressing poor Palestinian terrorists, and that the Jewish conspiracy in America is responsible for all of this. The group’s Web site stunningly equates the Jewish “occupation” with Nazi death camps in WW II. (Didn’t Hitler use this same type of propaganda?)

Wheels of Justice sought to bring maps of the “occupied” Palestinian land to Andover High to show just how victimized the Palestinians are at the hands of the evil Jews. But nowhere on its website or in its speeches do they condemn suicide bombings, terrorist acts against civilians, Palestinian support for terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbolah, or even al Qaeda’s 9/11 attack on the U.S.

In fact, Ron Francis himself makes excuses for all of these terrorist acts by saying that, if he lived in “Palestine,” he “would probably be a suicide bomber too.”...

It goes on.

And, showing that this issue has legs, History News Network has reprinted BU Professor Richard L. Cravatts's piece, originally printed at Israel Insider: Indoctrination Parading as History at Andover High

Melanie Phillips: 'For Goodness Sake, We Have GOT To Fight It.'

Just got back from seeing Melanie Phillips give a speech and book signing. Terrific. Here is audio of the talk.

We have a problem. Europe is in real trouble. It may already be too late...maybe not, but maybe so. We need to get over our self-consciousness about discussing nationalism and nationhood, and defining what these things mean and what the base-line minimums for membership in our society are. The Ummah doesn't have this hang-up, and they don't mind enforcing it, in many place, like the PA, at the point of a gun.

Post-colonial guilt and centuries of warfare have left discussion of nationhood a dangerous and dirty thing...not so here, not so much, not yet. We'd better start working on removing the guilt and self-consciousness from such discussions. Otherwise the day may come when we'll wish we had.

Bad for the GOP, but for conservatives...not so much...

Jeff Jacoby in the Globe: A debacle just for GOP

..."The reason we are at this moment," former president Bill Clinton told a group of Democratic donors Nov. 1, "is that they do not represent faithfully the Republicans and the more conservative independents in the country. Otherwise, we wouldn't be here tonight. This is a sweeping, deep, big thing." According to the nation's most popular Democrat, in other words, Republicans were about to be punished for having abandoned their Republican principles. Voters were going to demote the GOP not because its agenda had grown too conservative -- but because it hadn't been conservative enough.

Exactly.

Nov. 7 was a debacle for Republicans, not conservatives. Democrats gained power in Washington, but around the country there was no shortage of evidence that the nation's tectonic shift to the right is still ongoing. Seven more states approved amendments barring same-sex marriage; only in Arizona was a marriage amendment narrowly defeated. The backlash against the Supreme Court's disgraceful 2005 Kelo v. New London decision continued as well, with voters in 10 states adopting new laws to protect property owners from eminent domain abuse.

The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative was a brilliant conservative victory and a humiliating Republican defeat. By an impressive 16-point margin, Michigan voters said no to racial and gender preferences in state employment, education, and public contracting. But Republicans, who had joined Democrats, big business, and the activist left in opposing the initiative, reaped no political benefit. The GOP had jettisoned its party's colorblind creed in the hope of dampening Democratic turnout. In the end, Democrats swept the Senate and governor's races anyway, while the civil-rights initiative that Republicans should have endorsed sailed to a 58-42 win.

Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is a San Francisco liberal of the first water, but many of her party's incoming freshmen campaigned as cultural conservatives. Indiana Democrat Brad Ellsworth, for example, described himself as anti abortion, pro-traditional marriage, "a hunter who supports the Second Amendment," and a "local sheriff" who would fight "to protect our kids from violence and filth on TV and the Internet." He and other "blue-dog" conservatives will be tugging the new Democratic majority to the right, while the defeat of liberal Republicans like Connecticut's Nancy Johnson and Iowa's Jim Leach means that the Republican minority in the 110th Congress will move to the right as well...

It's going to be an interesting two years. Those of us looking at the new Democrat leadership and the reemergence of George McGovern and despairing at the left turn the country appears to be taking may be pleasantly surprised. Those of us quietly reveling at the growing irrelevance of the Democrat Party may be disappointed.

Palestinian groups: US target for terror attacks

Four militant Palestinian groups issue joint statement calling on Muslims, Palestinians everywhere to ‘mercilessly strike American targets due to US support of Israel’s crimes and massacres’

Four Palestinian organizations threatened Sunday to launch attacks on US targets in response to what they said was America’s “support of the Israeli crimes and massacres, the last of which occurred in Beit Hanoun.”

A statement was signed by the Popular Resistance Committees, the Al-Aqsa Brigades (Fatah’s armed wing), the Fatah-affiliated Abu Rish Brigades, and another Islamic group who’s name has recently surfaced – the Tawahid Brigades.

The groups warn the United States that its policy is making it “a legitimate target for Palestinian organizations and any Muslim or Palestinian around the world.”

The statement also calls on “all free men everywhere and all the mujahadeen in the Islamic nation to mercilessly strike the Americans – to feed them the same food they are feeding us.”...

There was a time when I would have said that Palestinian Arab attacks against America would be a big mistake for them. I'm no longer so sure.

British 'silently boycott' Israeli academics

Israeli researchers, professors boycotted by British press, higher education institutions in protest of ‘occupation of Palestinian territories’

The International Advisory Board for Academic Freedom warns against a “silent boycott” in Britain against Israeli institutes of higher education.

The council said that Israeli researchers wishing to publish articles in Britain were asked to remove the name of which ever Israeli academic institute they belonged to as a condition for publishing their articles.

The latest “unofficial boycott” was initiated by the “Bibliography of Translation Studies" journal, owned by a British publishing house headed by Mona Baker, a supporter of the academic boycott on Israel.

The publishing house invited professors from all over the world to send in articles for publication. Among the many professors who accepted the invitation was Prof. Miriam Shlesinger, Department Chair of Translation and Interpreting Studies at Bar-Ilan University.

Shlesinger asked the new associate editor of the publication, Prof. Gaby Saldahana if she would be willing to accept Israeli articles. Saldahana replied that she would accept articles from researchers in Israel, but not from an Israeli academic institute.

Shlesinger, who used to head Amnesty International in Israel, decided not to send in an article to the journal...

Baker was the one who fired two Israeli employees from the staff of her academic journal a couple of years back. The article details some of the more overt expressions of this bigotry. Readers will be familiar with the events.

Hamas's Al-Zahar: We'll never recognize Israel

Hamas's Al-Zahar: We'll never recognize Israel

Palestinian Foreign Minister and Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar told al-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper on Sunday that his group will never "repeat Fatah's mistake of recognizing Israel ."

In a militant interview, which was conducted soon after the IDF's shelling of Beit Hanoun, al-Zahar explained why his group has no intension of recognizing Israel, accept a two-state solution and to accept the partition resolution adopted by the United Nations.

When asked what will happen if international pressure on Hamas increases, he said: "Hamas will never change its position regardless of the pressure's intensity."

He was asked about the Arab peace initiative which calls for recognition of Israel based on the principle of land for peace and said: "We will never recognize the Arab initiative. We ask what is its real value? And the answer is: nothing, because America and Israel rejected it. Also, we will not accept something called 'recognizing Israel'."

Even if the solution is one of two states?

"We can establish a Palestinian state on a foot of land of the liberated land."

And if there is solution that include the establishment of a Palestinian within the 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital?

"We will declare a hudna but we will never recognize Israel."...

...He added that Hamas rejects the United Nations partition of November 1947 as well as Resolution 242...

In case you actually thought for a moment (I know you didn't) that it matters what individual is in leadership:

...He said that Hamas is not solely ruled by Khaled Mashaal, adding that the leadership in the Gaza Strip and else where have as much say...

...On another front he confirmed that Iran financially supports the Hamas government: "We use the money to pay employees, but we do not get military aid from them, because it simply cannot reach us."

He said should presidential elections be held Hamas would win hands-up: "If presidential elections are held, Hamas will win and that's clear, and that is because when we call for marches many people answer our call. That's no joke, but reality. If we ask the Palestinian people, 'Do you accept recognition of Israel?' and our political plan was always that we won't, at least 70 percent of the Palestinian people would say, 'We will not recognize Israel.'"...

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Charles Jacobs: Paradigm Shift

Paradigm Shift by Charles Jacobs

“Apartheid” – the official policy of racial “apartness” – strangled South African blacks for decades with laws based on race hate. Racism is today’s scarlet letter: once branded a racist, you’re an outcast. Today, anti-Israel “activists” campaign to mark Israel “an apartheid state.”

On Nov. 19, the Northeastern University School of Law and the National Lawyers Guild are hosting a five-hour event called “Beyond Apartheid in Israel/Palestine: the Reality on the Ground and Lessons from South Africa.” Every speaker on the program is an anti-Zionist activist/intellectual.

As we have seen often at such events, speakers will decry Israel’s building of “the apartheid wall” (mostly a chain link fence) as racism. They will dismiss Israel’s need to protect Jews from Arabs who murder them in the name of Allah. Arab murderers will likely be called “freedom fighters.” They’ll make the case in humanitarian terms: walls are bad – people can’t get to work or hospitals. Walls divide and discriminate between populations. Yet at this conference, don’t expect a protest of the wall Saudi Arabia is building on its borders with Yemen and Iraq, or the wall between India and Pakistan, or the electronically-charged fence between Botswana and Zimbabwe, or the DMZ between North and South Korea. It’s not really about walls, actually. It’s about Jews. The National Lawyers Guild doesn’t like Jewish walls.

Apartheid? Israel is the sole democracy in the Middle East, the only place in the region where Arab citizens possess equal rights. Citizens vote, worship freely, are part of the government – and criticize it constantly without fear.

Actually, just as with “walls,” these folks don’t really care about apartheid. They won’t protest gender apartheid throughout the Middle East, where brothers and fathers kill sisters and daughters who act “immodestly.” They won’t protest ethnic apartheid in Sudan, where Arab Muslims ethnically cleanse African Muslims and Christians, driving them off their lands, capturing and enslaving, or just slaughtering them. They won’t criticize religious apartheid in Saudi Arabia, where you can’t be a citizen unless you’re a Muslim.

By withholding the evidence of equal rights enjoyed by Arab-Israelis, minimizing the injustices committed by the Arab despots that surround the Jewish state and misrepresenting the reasons for the security wall, the speakers and sponsors of “Beyond Apartheid in Israel/Palestine” are guilty of defamation against Israel, as well as cheapening the actual experience of apartheid suffered by blacks in South Africa.

Though the National Lawyers Guild has the right to assemble and the invited guests have the right to voice their political views – as they would be allowed in any democratic country including Israel – responsible people in the audience also have the right to call them on their lies and their utter hypocrisy. Someday, Northeastern University Law School may have the courage to convene a conference on actual Middle Eastern apartheid. Women, escaped black slaves, oppressed Christians, terrified apostates, atheists and gays ... a terrific panel. We’re ready, Northeastern. Are you?

This column was co-written by Charles Jacobs and Erik Miller from The David Project Center for Jewish Leadership.

Friday, November 10, 2006

The Iranian Lynndie England

And she ain't bad at all...

lynndie

All filmed in Lebanon, btw.

MEMRITV: "Guantanamo" - American Officer Tortures Prisoners and Murders Investigator in an Iranian TV Drama

On November 4, 2006, the Iranian channel Al-Kawthar TV (formerly Sahar 1 TV) aired a drama called "'Remember Your Dreams' or 'Guantanamo.'" The film purports to show how the Abu Ghuraib photos were made public,and how the evil of the fictional U.S. Army Major Rosenthal [Say, isn't that a Jooish name?] was exposed, through the efforts of fictional characters: former Guantanamo detainee Dr. Mustafa Nasser, U.S. Army Corporal Jennifer Smith, Lawyers Without Borders activist Andre Mahfuz, Mahfuz's former fiancée, journalist Christine Lemoine, and a helpful Beirut hotel receptionist. The story is set in Guantanamo and in Beirut. The film's credits state that the film was shot in Lebanon and thank IRIB offices in Beirut, Al-Manar TV in Beirut, Lebanese Ministry of Defense, Lebanese Ministry of General Security, Lebanese Interior Ministry, Beirut International Airport and Customs, Beirut Municipality, UNESCO Beirut, and others...

Haniya Willing to Bow Out?

But it's not about him, personally, it's about Hamas: Hamas leader hints he'll bow out

Hamas leader and Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ismail Haniya suggested Friday that he would not head a proposed unity government if stepping aside would help to bring back Western aid.

Speaking to worshippers gathered for Friday prayers at a Gaza City mosque, Haniya said the West did not want him to be a part of the new administration and would not lift its embargo unless he is replaced as leader.

"[They have] one condition, that the siege will not be lifted unless the prime minister is changed," Haniya said, according to Reuters. "When the issue is like this, the siege on one hand, the prime minister on the another ... I prefer the siege be lifted and the suffering ended."

The loss of direct international aid to the Palestinian government has caused an economic crisis in the West Bank and Gaza. The unity government is seen as a bid to resume the flow of aid, which is the government's main source of funding.

The Quartet of Middle East peace brokers, comprising the United States, the United Nations, the European Union and Russia, has boycotted the Hamas-led government since it came to power in March after elections...

Palestinian Work Accident Watch

Quick, someone call ICAHD!

Explosion levels Gaza house in apparent accident with bomb

An explosion destroyed the house of a militant leader late Thursday in Gaza City, apparently an accident with explosives, Palestinian security officials said.

Two people were rescued alive from the rubble. The security officials said the blast was caused by explosives inside the house.

The house belonged to Talal Abu Safiyah, commander of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine forces in the area. The PFLP is a small, radical Palestinian group. The PFLP said the house was hit by a missile fired from an Israeli F-16 warplane, but other Palestinians said they did not hear a warplane overhead, and the Israeli military said there was no airstrike...

Thursday, November 9, 2006

Andover Finally Begins to Find Its Voice

The Andover Townsman has come out with an editorial in support of the school administration's decision not to allow Wheels of Justice into the High School (temporarily, at least):

...There is no First Amendment issue here. Allowing outside groups of any ideological stripe to come in and proselytize students detracts from the educational function of schools. Teachers who claim they merely seek to provide a range of world perspectives should not object to a forum that includes opposing views. And teachers giving students flyers that are critical of the administration does not advance education in town.

The First Amendment guarantees Wheels of Justice the right to hold its views and speak them. It gives it the right to stand on a street corner or other public space and shout its message. It does not grant it the right to come into a school building to lecture a captive audience of children over the objections of the teachers' bosses, the school administration.

Andover school leaders made the right decision.

The letters page includes one mushy-headed letter from the school's psychologist (really) in favor of the invitation, and two letters in support of the decision to at the very least delay Wheels of Justice's presence -- one letter signed by 51 Andover High School parents.

The first:

Congratulations to Andover High School Principal Peter Anderson for keeping the focus of the teachers and students where it should be: on providing and receiving an education. The high school is not the forum for presenting one-sided views of the world. It is the place where our children should receive non-biased information from impartial educators, not from a group of traveling zealots with their own agenda. If the Wheels of Justice want to hold a forum to advance their agenda, great! The First Amendment gives them the right. Just hold their forum some place other than our high school. Otherwise who comes next to exercise their right of free speech: the Taliban, the Ku Klux Klan, or a group of neo-Nazis?

Fortunately, the majority of teachers at AHS do not see the need to expose their students to the views of these radical groups. Instead they do what they are supposed to do: teach their students the approved curriculum and allow the student to listen to these outside groups (if they choose) outside of the classroom. The high school is not the place for a few teachers to advance their personal agendas, biases and political crusades. I commend Anderson, the administration and all the dedicated teachers at Andover High School for providing our sons and daughters with a quality education. Keep up the good work.

The second, signed by 51 parents:

As a concerned group of parents from Andover High School we would like to voice our support for Peter Anderson's decision to postpone a presentation scheduled for Oct. 27 by the group Wheels for Justice. From what we understand, Anderson did not have adequate time in advance of the date to research the background of this group to properly consider if they should be invited to speak at the high school. This type of research would be done with any group that would potentially make a presentation to the students.

As parents we respect and support Anderson's decision on this matter.

Pelosi's Idea of Bipartisanship

This is going to be a very interesting two years.

..."Nancy Pelosi wants total party discipline," a source in the Democratic Party leadership said. "If you played ball with the Republicans during this session, then you're not going to be given an important chair in the next session."...

They're not happy for the reasons you may think they are

They're not partying because the evil Republicans are gone, Bush defanged, and now the peace they so desire is marching close. That's pure cognitive egocentrism -- projecting your values on others who don't necessarily share them -- that's a danger of interpreting images without understanding the societal context that gave them motion.

They're partying because they feel like they won a battle, and they're closer to winning it all.

Project Valour-IT!

This is a reminder! For a great cause! Yes I'm shouting! BUT NOT SCREAMING!

I wrote about it before, now I'm writing about it again. Project Valour-IT buys voice activated laptops for soldiers who were hurt...bad hurt. It's good cause, and a number of bloggers are raising funds to help. I'm on the Navy team. When I joined, we were lagging the other services, now we doth kick ass...but we need more money to make our goal, and time is running out.

Are you a person with money? Even a little bit set aside for good causes? Here's a place to go and peel off a little green. It's tax deductible.

Here's another Navy-oriented cool military pic just for reading this:

f18

An F/A-18C Hornet aircraft assigned to the "Knighthawks" of Strike Fighter Squadron One Three Six (VFA-136) tests its flare countermeasure system over the Arabian Sea Oct. 15, 2006, before heading into Afghanistan for a close air support mission. Members of VFA-136, which is part of Carrier Air Wing One, are embarked aboard the nuclear powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65) for a scheduled six-month deployment in support of maritime security operations and the war on terror. DoD photo by Lt. Peter Scheu, U.S. Navy.

They fired his board-op, too?

SDP's New Hero

The Jerusalem Post picked up the story of the Somerville Divestment Project's latest defeat (see: Divestment Defeated in Somerville...again...again...), here: Boston area voters refuse ballot call for divestment from Israel

...Like past efforts, this year's referenda were overwhelming defeated. The questions asked voters whether the district's representative in the state legislature should be called on to back divestment from Israel bond holdings and the Palestinian right of return should they come up for a vote in the State House.

On the former, residents voted 70 percent to 30% against, also defeating the latter 55-45.

"It was an amazing victory," said Greater Boston's Jewish Community Relations Council Executive Director Nancy Kaufman, who said the issues on referenda issues wouldn't have come before the state legislature in any case. "We hope this puts the issue to rest once and for all."

She added that the anti-divestment effort had a "wall to wall" coalition of support from Jews "right, left and center," as well as from the mayor, state representatives and all of Massachusetts' gubernatorial candidates.

But the divestment project gave no indication of giving up.

SDP board member Ron Francis said the group was celebrating the result that "45% of residents of Somerville reject Israel's ethnic cleansing."

He said that "people just said no, we're not just going to fall lock-step behind the elected officials just because they give the illusion of consensus."...

They'll be back. What else have they got to do?

Meanwhile, the Somerville Divestment Project has a new hero. Look who's featuring front and center on their site:

sdpcarter

Wednesday, November 8, 2006

CAIR Pushed For Klocek's Firing

In full, reposted from Free DePaul. The Council for American-Islamic Relations was all over DePaul University to get rid of Thomas Klocek. Their strong-arm tactics must be read to be believed, and the way they abused civil rights law and rules designed to enhance the academic environment is shocking and instructive.

Islamic Group’s Threats to DePaul University Confirmed by New Evidence

Professor and Academic Freedom Took the Fall

Newly released evidence has revealed that the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) worked privately to pressure DePaul University to fire adjunct professor Thomas Klocek for telling Muslim activist students that their views on Middle-East issues were wrong. According to a letter to DePaul’s President from CAIR’s executive director M. Yaser Tabbara, “In light of …Mr. Klocek’s biased remarks, we are requesting that the University…reprimand Mr. Klocek for his conduct by permanently dismissing him from any teaching post at DePaul University.” (Exhibit # DPU 945).

At a student fair on September 15, 2004, during the same month that DePaul launched its Islamic World Studies Program, Professor Klocek engaged several Muslim students in a heated discussion about the Arab-Israeli conflict. He strongly disputed their assertions that Israeli treatment of Palestinians was equivalent to the Nazi treatment of the Jews. He also cited a Chicago Sun-Times columnist who was quoting an Aljazeera writer to the effect that although not all Muslims are terrorists, today most terrorists are Muslim. Later, in another connection between DePaul and the Muslim community, a DePaul Trustee, Michael Murad, wrote to DePaul’s president asking, “What steps have been taken to ensure that DePaul programs in the Middle East are not undermined by this incident?” (#DPU 003174)

According to documents furnished by DePaul in response to document discovery in the lawsuit between Klocek and DePaul, less than a month after the student fair incident, on October 12, 2004, CAIR’s Tabbara sent an email to those who opposed Klocek, stating, “…we [CAIR] will be ready to file a formal complaint with the Illinois State Board of Higher Education… This will also be accompanied by a press release, a press conference or both.” (DPU 003493)

Tabbara’s email also referred to a letter sent to DePaul’s president the next day in which Tabbara made the following demands of DePaul, “In light of the grave implications of Mr. Klocek’s biased remarks, we are requesting that the University take appropriate and immediate responsive action…including:

1. Provide a formal written apology to the students who experienced the incident firsthand.

2. Reprimand Mr. Klocek for his conduct by permanently dismissing him from any teaching post at DePaul University.”

CAIR continued its campaign against Klocek when, according to another just released document (DPU 000763), on December 16, 2004 CAIR wrote Prof. Klocek’s Dean, Suzanne Dumbleton, and said, “The gravity of Mr. Klocek’s actions towards the students should result in his permanent dismissal as a matter of policy. Any alternative action will set a dangerous precedent…”

John W. Mauck, attorney for Thomas Klocek, said, “These documents confirm our suspicions. Rather than protect academic freedom or even treat Thomas Klocek, a professor with a 14 year spotless track record at DePaul, the university surrendered to behind-the-scenes Muslim activist pressure. At DePaul academic freedom has been subjugated to Sharia.”

To see copies of these and other documents view below PDF documents.
DPU 3174.pdf - DPU 3493.pdf - DPU 763_764.pdf - DPU 945.pdf

Marathon Pundit has more.

Mahathir Worried About Saddam

There but for the grace of Allah go I?

Mahathir slams Saddam sentence

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) -- Former Malaysian leader Mahathir Mohamad lashed out Tuesday against Saddam Hussein's death sentence, claiming the court was set up by his enemies in a "Nuremberg-type" fashion, incapable of a fair trial.

"It was a Nuremberg-type court, manifestly biased and incapable of being just," Mahathir said in a statement, referring to the tribunals for members of Adolf Hitler's Nazi regime over the killings of six million Jews during World War II.

Mahathir, who was predominantly Muslim Malaysia's prime minister for 22 years until retirement in October 2003, is well known for his blunt and critical comments about Jews and the West. He is also a vocal critic of the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

While in office, Mahathir projected himself as a spokesman of the Muslim and developing world, winning widespread admiration among the people and leaders of poor countries. After retirement he set up an international committee to defend Saddam...

Mahathir Mohamad, critic of Jews. It does have something of a ring.

In Memory of Jason Korsower

Some of you may remember the name Jason Korsower. He was the young man who worked for Steven Emerson's Investigative Project who was found dead under somewhat mysterious circumstances. There is a web site in his memory here.

The Jewish National Fund has announced that it will dedicate a memorial plaque in his memory and is trying to raise $5000 for the project by the time of his yarzheit on December 4th (anniversary of his death according to the Hebrew calendar). The donation page is here.

MEMRI: Top Hamas Officials: 'We Want [All of] Palestine, from the River to the Sea'; 'Resistance and Jihad Are Legitimate'

MEMRI has a collection of quotes and clips from Hamas leaders showing where they really stand with regard to coexistence. Would you sit still while this grew next door?

In the nine months since it came to power, and despite the PLO's demands, Hamas has not changed its views: It refuses to recognize Israel or acknowledge its legitimacy, insists that previous Israeli-Palestinian peace agreements will be recognized only if they serve Palestinian interests, continues to lay claim to all of Palestine, and, in exchange for the establishment of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, offers only a temporary hudna (ceasefire). In addition, Hamas continues to express reservations about the Arab peace initiative of 2002, and to support resistance, jihad, and abduction of Israeli soldiers.

Here are the text links. Here is a collection of videos.

No Uranium in Lebanon

As if you needed a government commission to know that Robert Fisk's piece in The Independent (see: Israel's 'Secret Uranium Bomb' -- Robert Fisk's latest slander) was utter paranoid crap: UN: No IDF uranium bomb use in Lebanon:

...Steiner also said the UN team found no evidence of penetrators or metal made of depleted uranium or other radioactive material. The assessment appeared to counter some media reports that suggested uranium-based munitions had been used during the month long war that ended on Aug. 14.

”No depleted uranium shrapnel, or other radioactive residue was found. The analysis of all smear samples taken shows no depleted uranium, enriched uranium or higher than natural uranium content in the samples,” he said in a statement.

Steiner said the UN team collected samples from Sept. 30 to Oct. 21 with one group focusing on munitions during the conflicts. Several samples were taken to three independent laboratories in Europe for tests, the statement said...

Not that DU would have mattered -- Fisk's article went beyond that to "secret uranium bombs." Honest Reporting UK says The Independent is unrepentant.

MAS Watch: Israel the Apartheid State

This just in on the Muslim American Society Boston email list. Here's what your partners in dialog are really thinking:

The Northeastern University School of Law National Lawyers Guild Chapter & the Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights present

BEYOND APARTHEID IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE:
The Reality on the Ground & Lessons from South Africa

[Time and Location snipped out.] Northeastern University Law School...

With:
OMAR BARGHOUTI, Palestinian analyst, activist and writer;
FELICIA EAVES, Co-chair, Black Voices for Peace;
LEILA FARSAKH, Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Massachusetts at Boston;
ILAN PAPPE, Senior Lecturer of Political Science, Haifa University in Israel;
publications include The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (2006);
CHUCK TURNER, Boston City Councilor;
DAVID WILDMAN, United Methodist Church General Board of Global Ministries;
WILL YOUMANS, Attorney and divestment activist;
AND MANY MORE…

On July 9, 2005, the first anniversary of the International Court of Justice ruling on the illegality of Israel’s Wall, over 170 Palestinian civil society organizations issued a Call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) to be directed against Israel until it complies with international law and universal principles of human rights. This conference will examine why Israel’s policies towards Palestinians are apartheid policies. It will explore the role activists can play to respond to the Palestinian Call for BDS, and to help create the kind of pressure that will be needed to move the region “beyond apartheid.”...

Rumsfeld Out, Gates In

Rumsfeld quitting as defense secretary

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush announced Wednesday that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is stepping down from his post.

"The timing is right for new leadership at the Pentagon," Bush said at the White House Wednesday afternoon.

Rumsfeld has been heavily criticized for his policies in Iraq, and exit polls taken during Tuesday's midterm election showed strong voter dissatisfaction -- 57 percent -- with the Iraq war.

"I recognize that many Americans voted last night to register their displeasure with the lack of progress being made" in Iraq, Bush said...

Bush said he has "a series of thoughtful conversations" with Rumsfeld about the defense secretary's resignation.

Former CIA chief Robert Gates,who headed that agency from 1991 until 1993, will be nominated to take over as defense secretary, Bush said Wednesday.

Gates is now president of Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas...

Update: Big roundup of links at PJM.

Divestment Defeated in Somerville...again...again...

Thanks to Ron Newman in the comments for the preliminary results, here are the final results in Somerville for ballot questions 5 and 6 -- "right of return" and divestment respectively:

As Somerville went to the polls Tuesday, they were being asked to vote on two questions — 5 and 6 — sponsored by the Somerville Divestment Project.

Both were rejected.

Question 5 — a nonbinding resolution asking the federal government to support the right of all refugees, including Palestinian refugees, to return "home" — was defeated.

With all precincts reporting, Somerville voted:

Yes by 5,098 votes or 38.87 percent

No by 6,236 or 48 percent

On Question 6, a non-binding resolution seeking divestment from Israel and all those supplying military equipment to Israel, Somerville also said no.

With all 21 precincts reporting, Somerville said:

Yes by 3,522 or 27 percent

No 7,735 or 59 percent.

Congratulations to all those who worked hard on getting these things defeated, and to the residents of Somerville for doing the right thing.

Somervillepeace kvells a bit.

Lieberman/Lamont Wrap up: Well, that was interesting...

Looks like I was in one of the few comfortable places to be last night if you favor Republicans, and somewhat ironically, that was at Lieberman party HQ.

First I want to mention how impressed I was with the professionalism of the Pajamas Media crew (picture in this post). They (lead by Andrew Marcus) were working their nards off until late into the night, coordinating video uploads with the folks out in California and the web site crew to bring polished, professional video out ASAP. It was most impressive to watch. One of my little contributions is here, speaking with one, Attorney Martin Luther Carter talks about some voting irregularities he had witnessed:

I was basically wandering around with a fancy digital camera that did video, too, looking for interesting opportunities. Sissy and Tuck were also there, and had a close hallway encounter (see link), and of course the inimitable Pamela made her presence known.

I stuck around until just before midnight. Not having secured a room, and with the garage closing, I blew out for the two hour drive home and got in this morning at around 2am. Figured I may as well get in half a night's sleep at home instead of some highway Econolodge.

OK, let's put a game face on for a minute and do one final analysis. What happened in the race? Why didn't Lamont make it?

I'm going to stick with my analysis back in this post. Let's state it again for the record.

Lamont ran against the war in Iraq and against President Bush, outflanking Lieberman far on his Left -- a direction Lieberman was vulnerable from -- to defeat the incumbent in the primary battle. So far, so normal. Candidates always run hard over to appeal to the base in the primaries, because it's the party faithful that tend out toward the edges that vote most reliably in those things.

Conventional wisdom dictates, however, that in the general election, it's time to shift gears and try to appeal to the broad middle, that wide bell curve of voters who hold the keys to the office in their hands.

But Lamont had a problem, whether at first he was so overcome by Leftist anti-War zeal that he didn't know any better, or he just didn't have a very good campaign, Lamont never shifted gears out of primary mode. As I noted when he started running his anti-Lieberman "turncoat" ads:

This is representative of understandable frustration and satisfying to the true-believers. As one Lamont commenter notes:

...I think I can safely say on behalf of the peanut gallery that this ad very nicely sums up our intense frustration with Joe Lieberman.

But the primaries are over and Lamont already won. He needs to do more than appeal to the base. I'm not sure that an ad like this really appeals to that vast swath of voters one needs to win a general election, where loyalty to party politics is probably not a great selling point. Advantage Lieberman for his blackboard ad and current "I'm above political parties" posture.

Indeed. In fact, it seemed Lamont at times did feint toward a strategy other than pounding on the Iraq War, but it couldn't work, because on other issues, Lieberman is a big government liberal just like Lamont, only Lieberman can do it better, because he's got more experience -- something Lieberman pushed in his advertising. Health Care? Education? Lieberman is for all that, too, and it's not convincing that a newcomer like Lamont would be able to succeed where an experienced and connected pol like Lieberman couldn't.

So the numbers work like this: You've got people on the Left (and the nutty Right) who hate the War on Terror, Iraq, and anyone who would making common cause with George Bush on anything so much that the primary battle is the only one you need to fight again to get their vote.

But then you've got a mass of people on the Left and many moderate conservatives for whom the bread a butter issues -- health care, education, etc. -- not national security -- are paramount. As we've seen, Lieberman beats Lamont handily on this count, and a lot people are not going to vote one way or the other on Iraq and spite themselves at home. So for this group, it's advantage Lieberman.

OK, you ask, what about conservatives and Republicans? Why vote for Lieberman and not Schlessinger? Because for a large number of these people, national security is the issue of paramount import. They know two things: Schlessinger can't win, and Ned Lamont and his Leftist baggage train of Vietnam era reenactors are a disaster that must be avoided at all costs.

They can live with Lieberman's liberalism, they've survived so far, but they cannot live with a Lamont Democrat's approach to the War on Terror. Advantage Lieberman again.

So what to do if you're Ned Lamont? You've tried to broaden the base but quickly realize there's no room to work there in a middle well owned by the incumbent, so it's back to run a hard primary-style campaign, and hope that there are enough angry people out there that, when combined with the number being sliced off of Lieberman by Schlessinger out on the Right, you'll be left with enough votes to win in a three-way race...something that may have worked in a true three-way race -- something that never developed despite the best efforts of Lamont and the Lefty bloggers to get conservatives to pay attention to Republican Schlessinger.

In the end, anger just wasn't enough. Self-interest played its usual part, and it's a 10 point win for Joe Lieberman.

Tuesday, November 7, 2006

joe

AP Calls for Lieberman

Hartford 2

Have Arrived

Just getting set up here in the PJ Media suite. Thought I'd toss a few shots of the location up:

This hall will be packed later:

thehall

MSM reserves space:

thehall

The laptop room:

thehall

The hubs, the glorious hubs:

thehall

Evan Coyne Maloney...intense:

thehall

PJ gets ready to edit:

thehall

Monday, November 6, 2006

Lieberman/Lamont Notebook: The tomorrow edition

Well, I was going to do one last round-up, but I'm over a week behind and really...it's time to get it on! The only poll that matters, as they say, is happening tomorrow.

Blogging will be light ...or heavy...I'm not sure. Looks like I'll be heading on down to Lieberman headquarters in Hartford as part of the Pajamas Media coverage to hang around with a camera and a laptop and see if I can capture anything interesting.

Road trip!

oneflew

Lieberman (the Israeli one)

The rise in the political fortunes of Israel Our Home leader, Avigdor Lieberman, has people on both the Left and the Right (mostly the Left) world-wide having conniptions. This article in The Telegraph is garnering a lot of attention: Jews and Arabs can never live together, says Israel's vice PM

...He has no intention of withdrawing Jewish settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Instead, he wants to keep them while, "in return", redrawing Israel's border to eject thousands of Israeli Arabs from the country.

"Minorities are the biggest problem in the world," he said in his soft, Russian-accented English. Asked if Israeli citizens of Arab descent should be forced out through territorial redistribution, he said: "I think separation between two nations is the best solution. Cyprus is the best model. Before 1974, the Greeks and Turks lived together and there were frictions and bloodshed and terror.

"After 1974, they constituted all Turks on one part of the island, all Greeks on the other part of the island and there is stability and security."

When it was pointed out that in Cyprus thousands were forcibly driven from their homes, he replied: "Yes, but the final result was better."

Later, an aide to Mr Lieberman tried to flesh out his remarks. "Israeli Arabs don't have to go," he said. "But if they stay they have to take an oath of allegiance to Israel as a Jewish Zionist state."...

Sounds a bit shocking at first, then you realize he may have a point, and a lot of the shock is not so much from what he's saying but by how it will be heard by many ears, and by how it's being portrayed...the article is about the interview, but does not include the interview itself. There's a lot of talk about "racism," which often, unfortunately, substitutes for a serious-headed discussion of the merits.

YNet talks about it, here, Haaretz, here. Haaretz also adds lots of fuel for the heat, but only so-so light, here. Surprisingly, Reuters seems to give a fairly dispassionate accounting, here: Israeli rightist urges Cyprus-like "separation", as does AP, here: Israeli official wants homogenous nation.

I post this not to advocate for what he's saying, nor to denounce it -- I simply don't know enough about internal Israeli politics to express a strong opinion, nor do I know enough about this guy...but I do think it's worth taking a step back and listening for a moment and seeing if there's merit in what he says before simply writing him off and posing with stock denunciations.

Interview with an MP in Iraq

Confederate Yankee interviewed a couple of our guys over there, the results are here. Here's a snip:

...Q: This is completely up to you. Please use this opportunity to tell us anything and everything you would like readers to know about your experiences in Iraq. Unlike newspaper journalists, I have virtually unlimited space, so please take as much time to tell us what you think the American people should know.

SSG Oliver: First, I want to thank everyone that supports our troops. This is by far the most important thing. Second, I wish that people back home could see everything that happens here, not just the gruesome stories of a war torn country. There is so much more to everything that the Coalition is doing in this country that goes unnoticed. Things such as seeing Soldiers interacting with the local children, giving them school supplies, toys and even sharing their candy and whatever other things the Soldiers have. I cannot remember when the press ran a story about U.S Soldiers establishing an aid station out in a community that allowed many Iraqis to receive medical attention that they would have otherwise not received. The media needs to rethink the coverage and produce a balance of both the good and bad, and maybe then the world will not think that this is a completely war ravaged country...

MEMRITV: Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi on the Risks of Female Masturbation

OK...I...what I mean is...uhhh...

MEMRITV: Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi on the Risks of Female Masturbation

Following are excerpts from a lecture by Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi, which aired on Qatar TV on October 28, 2006.

Sheik Yousuf Al-Qaradhawi: Female masturbation is more risky than male masturbation. Male masturbation is not as risky. Sometimes women insert finger, and some women insert objects that may be risky, especially since the hymen is very sensitive, and any playing with it may tear it. This might expose the woman to accusations. She may tell them this or that, but they will not believe her. They will think she must have had forbidden relations with some guys. This way, a person exposes himself to accusations of fornication, a woman might be accused of fornication. She will bring disgrace upon herself and her family. This will be a disaster, and some relatives might kill her. Some people do not stop at the boundaries of religious law. Driven by jealousy and rage, they might commit a crime and kill the girl. Obviously, killing her is forbidden and is a grave sin. Even if she did fornicate, she does not deserve to be killed. At most, she should be flogged, if she confesses four times, or if there were witnesses. Therefore, I do not advise the girls ever to resort to this. A girl must be patient. The thing that tempts such girls, I am sad to say, is that they teach one another. One says to the other: "I did this and that," or "I saw a film, in which they did this and that. " Some TV channels, especially European ones, show outrageous sexual things, which are unacceptable by our standards, our moral values, and religious law. These things are rejected. These scandalous, nude films... A girl might learn things from these people. A Muslim girl must commit herself to what her God decreed. She must take care of herself, fast, pray, be God fearing, keep herself busy. She can read a useful book, prepare her homework, join a charity, and spend her time doing things that are useful to her in this world and the world to come, instead of thinking about satisfying her urges, especially in a manner forbidden by religious law.

Palestine Hearts Saddam

Reed Hillman Guest Blogging at Hub Politics

Between Art and News

Muslim Propaganda at the University of Chicago

Even The Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago...

...Having skipped right over two centuries of Jewish political sovereignty in favor of an anti-Zionist story line that has the Jews abandoning political life after the Babylonian exile in favor of developing exclusively as a religion, we come to the advent of Christianity.

Jesus was born into this context, and was hailed by his followers as the Messiah, Son of God.

Fair enough. Scholarly and objective. But when we come to Mohammed, scholarly objectivity disappears.

Six centuries later, the Prophet Mohammed would visit Jerusalem where he would experience his Night Flight and Ascension to heaven.

Only the pious believe that the visit and night flight are actual, historical events. Mohammed’s visit and Night Flight is a religious myth or dream, not an actual event. The Prophet never actually visited Jerusalem. The Quran speaks not of a visit to Jerusalem, but of a visit to the “farthest mosque.” Scholarly dispute over the event centers around the question of how early the Quranic reference to “the “farthest mosque” came to be interpreted as a reference to Jerusalem.

But note the wording of the plaque. Even a museum visitor who does not believe in night flights and ascensions to heaven, will read -- and quite likely accept as fact -- the notion that Mohammed’s visit to Jerusalem was an actual, historical event. After all, this is the faculty of the University of Chicago saying that he did...

More here.

[h/t: Flea]

Sunday, November 5, 2006

Ron Francis Audio

Here's an update I just added to the entry below (Andover High Update -- Teachers Union and ACLU Dictate Curriculum (Long)):

Here is a short audio recording made at the Wheels of Justice event this past Saturday in Somerville. This is basically a very short series of audio "pull quotes" featuring Ron Francis. First we hear him bragging about forcing the Somerville Aldermen to have a meeting on their behest (this is the latest thing the SDP is using to pester people with...if you get something like 50 signatures on a petition, you can force the Aldermen to meet. The meeting will be the 14th at Somerville City Hall. The Aldermen are not pleased)...then he talks about the High School business and laments that the Zionist Lobby was successful in getting the appearance cancelled. Finally, he laments the fact that the reason the Palestinian cause doesn't get more traction is that "the opposition" controls all the centers of power in this country.

Here is the audio (it's only about 3 minutes).

(May you never know how much you should thank me later for not posting audio of Joe Carr's Rachel Corrie poetry.)

Listening to the Jihadis

Walid Shoebat and his group...is anyone listening? Here's Tawfik Hamid: Hot for martyrdom

Dr. Tawfik Hamid doesn't tell people where he lives. Not the street, not the city, not even the country. It's safer that way. It's only the letters of testimony from some of the highest intelligence officers in the Western world that enable him to move freely. This medical doctor, author and activist once was a member of Egypt's Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Arabic for "the Islamic Group"), a banned terrorist organization. He was trained under Ayman al-Zawahiri, the bearded jihadi who appears in Bin Laden's videos, telling the world that Islamic violence will stop only once we all become Muslims.

He's a disarmingly gentle and courteous man. But he's determined to tell a complacent North America what he knows about fundamentalist Muslim imperialism.

"Yes, 'imperialism,' " he tells me. "The deliberate and determined expansion of militant Islam and its attempt to triumph not only in the Islamic world but in Europe and North America. Pure ideology. Muslim terrorists kill and slaughter not because of what they experience but because of what they believe."

Hamid drank in the message of Jihadism while at medical school in Cairo, and devoted himself to the cause. His group began meeting in a small room. Then a larger one. Then a Mosque reserved for followers of al-Zawahiri. By the time Hamid left the movement, its members were intimidating other students who were unsympathetic.

He is now 45 years old, and has had many years to reflect on why he was willing to die and kill for his religion. "The first thing you have to understand is that it has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with poverty or lack of education," he says. "I was from a middle-class family and my parents were not religious. Hardly anyone in the movement at university came from a background that was different from mine.

"I've heard this poverty nonsense time and time again from Western apologists for Islam, most of them not Muslim by the way. There are millions of passive supporters of terror who may be poor and needy but most of those who do the killing are wealthy, privileged, educated and free. If it were about poverty, ask yourself why it is middle-class Muslims -- and never poor Christians -- who become suicide bombers in Palestine."...

Here's the rest.

Eagle Tribune: Our view:Andover made right choice on Wheels of Justice

Andover High School sure has made a splash in the news, as have Ron Francis and Tom Meyers...and not in a good way. Now in the Eagle-Tribune:

Our view:Andover made right choice on Wheels of Justice

Schools are supposed to be places where children receive their educations. They are not indoctrination camps.

But a small group of teachers tried to turn Andover High into one with their attempt to bring a radical pro-Palestinian group in to lecture students. School leaders, primarily high school Principal Peter Anderson, were right to stop it.

Six teachers, among them physics teacher Ron Francis and social studies teacher Tom Meyers, who is also the president of the teachers union, invited members of the "Wheels of Justice" group to speak to students at the high school. The Wisconsin-based group travels the country in a bus offering, according to its Web site, "nonviolent education and action against war and occupation in Iraq and Palestine for justice and universal human rights."

Rabbi Robert S. Goldstein of Andover's Temple Emanuel objected to the group's appearance at the school saying Wheels of Justice is an "extremist" group whose messages "border on propaganda."

From our own experience, the rabbi's views are accurate. In a 2004 meeting with the paper's editorial board, members of Wheels of Justice were uninterested in discussion or dialogue. They were here to deliver a stern lecture on the evils of the United States and Israel.

Continue reading "Eagle Tribune: Our view:Andover made right choice on Wheels of Justice"

Herald Comes Out Against Divestment Questions

The Boston Herald has an editorial against the two anti-Israel ballot questions being pushed by Ron Francis and his Somerville Divestment Project:

An anti-Israel group has managed to put a question calling for sale of Israeli-related investments on the ballot in Somerville again this year. Even though this time it is non-binding and framed as an instruction to the state representative on how to vote on such a resolution for all state entities, the idea is still appalling.

The Somerville Divestment Project also has yet another non-binding resolution on the ballot, again cast as an instruction to the state rep, this time to vote for a non-binding resolution urging the federal government “to support the right of all refugees, including Palestinian refugees, to return to their land of origin.”

This is a dreadful idea too. The return of the 1948 refugees and their descendants, about 3 million people, would swamp the Jewish state. Those who support this proposal surely know that.

Two years ago Mayor Joe Curtatone was eloquent in opposition to an unsuccessful mandatory divestment resolution aimed at the city government. He has not changed his mind.

“They do nothing to promote real dialogue, peace or justice either here in Somerville or in the Middle East,” Curtatone said. “They represent a wasteful and inappropriate use of the ballot initiative system.”

Well put. These questions should be defeated.

The Somerville News has also come out against the questions

[h/t: Ron Newman] 

Graham on the Real Grace Ross, More on DePetro

Here's audio of Michael Graham riffing on "the real Grace Ross."  Emailer missed some at the beginning (not sure how much), and you can just hear him mention Ron Francis as it leads in.

Michael Graham audio

Jay has some thoughts on the DePetro firing flap:

...I've never liked the woman -- and not because of her figure or sexual preferences. She holds incredibly sophomoric lefty views that most of us shook off soon after college -- and yet we're all expected to treat her with pious kid gloves because she robotically spouts what pathetically passes for idealism...

He points to Adam's comment:

Yeah, no worse than calling the Margolis brothers a couple of short Jews. It's true, right?

It is true (I don't remember them being short, though), and no, it's no worse or better.  If DePetro had said that nothing would have happened, because he's not a hateful guy.  People would have laughed, or called the show and told him he's a jerk and he shouldn't say things like that.  On the point that I think Adam is trying to make -- that mocking Jews as Jews is more dangerous ground than mocking Gays as Gays...that's just the way it is.  The one is more socially acceptible than the other, even on that very station as Dan Kennedy points out.

I take it some folks don't like that difference, and would like making fun of gays to be in the same class of sin as scorning Jews in our culture, even to the point of hypersensitive posing to make the point.  OK, fine, see if you can shift peoples' attitudes on that.  But when you just arbitrarily decide that there's a new line that everyone's supposed to just know and when they step over it, you applaud their firing...that's what makes a lot of conservatives say that liberals are the most intolerant people you can ever meet -- they decide what everyone is supposed to think, and rather than using their own free speech to influence and convince, they shit-can your ass.

I wonder if anything will happen to Imus's Bernard McGuirk, who went into a rant at the live WTKK event last night naming a bunch of Jews and blaming "the dual-loyalty people" for the Iraq war he hates.

Saddam Sentenced to Be Hanged

Saturday, November 4, 2006

Indoctrination Parading as History at Andover High

BU Professor Richard Cravatts picks up the story of Andover's own Ron Francis at Israel Insider: Indoctrination Parading as History at Andover High

In a country where high school students cannot even correctly identify the century in which the American Civil War was waged, and who are able to name more of the Seven Dwarfs than sitting Supreme Court Justices, at least students in Andover High School will be very familiar with the historical term "ethnic cleansing," and how the world's singular and most egregious example of its continued practice is, of course, found in the "apartheid Zionist regime" of Israel.

Thanks to the efforts of Ron Francis, an Andover High physics teacher, and six of the School's history teachers, students will be have the rare opportunity of listening to the Leftist, anti-American, anti-Israel view of the "Wheels of Justice" organization, apologists for the Palestinian cause who preach to students that terrorism, the random murder of civilians in the resistance effort, is a justifiable tool in the Palestinian effort of self-determination against the Colonial settler "project" -- not State -- of Israel.

There was some controversy at the end of October when Andover High's principal, alerted to the actual nature and content of the Wheels of Justice traveling bus tour, temporarily postponed the visit until other speakers, offering a counterbalance to the dialogue, could be found. Tom Meyers, president of the teacher's union and an outspoken supporter of Mr. Francis and his views, was "shocked, shocked" by the School's decision to exclude the lecturers and limit someone's First Amendment rights, although it is not entirely clear exactly whose rights were being denied. The Constitution protects an individual's right to express their views, no matter how reprehensible, in what Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes termed the broad, public "marketplace of ideas," but nowhere is it incumbent on any institution, and certainly not public schools, to be forced to sponsor, or provide a public platform for, the ravings of any outside individual, merely because that individual has a message he or she is eager to express...

The rest is here.

France: The Al-Dura Defamation Case and the End of Free Speech

John Rosenthal has an excellent in-depth look at the Muhammed Al-Dura case, starting with a good primer on the events themselves (for those just tuning in), and following with an examination of the Karsenty decision: France: The Al-Dura Defamation Case and the End of Free Speech

...what is most notable about the court's ruling against Karsenty is that such a matter has come before the courts at all. It should be recalled that neither Charles Enderlin, nor, needless to say, the France2 executives in Paris, were present in Netzarim to witness the events at issue. They are thus no more in a position definitively to "affirm" that the scene was authentic than the Mena and its supporters are in a position definitively to affirm that it was staged. In both cases, we are dealing with just more or less plausible hypotheses. In a free society, such controversies are the stuff of public debate: with individuals being at liberty to form -- and express -- their convictions as they see fit. In France in 2006, this is evidently not the case....

Envoy: Hezbollah Wants 'Price' for Info

Hamas is driving for a deal over Gilad Shalit, and Hizballah is driving a bargain just to disclose information on whether Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser are even alive (more war crimes): Envoy: Hezbollah Wants 'Price' for Info

Hezbollah is asking "a price" for information about whether two Israeli soldiers kidnapped by the militant group are still alive, Britain's U.N. ambassador said Thursday.

Emyr Jones Parry's comment comes two days after Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah revealed that "serious negotiations" were taking place over the soldiers, whose capture provoked a 34-day war between Hezbollah and Israel.

"They're asking a price for proof of life," Jones Parry said Thursday.

He gave no details on what he meant by "price."

Nasrallah said in an interview on his group's television channel Al-Manar that a negotiator appointed by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan _ who has not been publicly identified _ had been mediating between Hezbollah and Israeli officials...

ADL: Anti-Semitism in Arab Media

Weakness Breeds Contempt -- Six Arab states join rush to go nuclear

Six Arab states join rush to go nuclear

THE SPECTRE of a nuclear race in the Middle East was raised yesterday when six Arab states announced that they were embarking on programmes to master atomic technology.

The move, which follows the failure by the West to curb Iran’s controversial nuclear programme, could see a rapid spread of nuclear reactors in one of the world’s most unstable regions, stretching from the Gulf to the Levant and into North Africa.

The countries involved were named by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as Algeria, Egypt, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. Tunisia and the UAE have also shown interest.

All want to build civilian nuclear energy programmes, as they are permitted to under international law. But the sudden rush to nuclear power has raised suspicions that the real intention is to acquire nuclear technology which could be used for the first Arab atomic bomb.

“Some Middle East states, including Egypt, Morocco, Algeria and Saudi Arabia, have shown initial interest [in using] nuclear power primarily for desalination purposes,” Tomihiro Taniguch, the deputy director-general of the IAEA, told the business weekly Middle East Economic Digest. He said that they had held preliminary discussions with the governments and that the IAEA’s technical advisory programme would be offered to them to help with studies into creating power plants.

Mark Fitzpatrick, an expert on nuclear proliferation at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said that it was clear that the sudden drive for nuclear expertise was to provide the Arabs with a “security hedge”.

“If Iran was not on the path to a nuclear weapons capability you would probably not see this sudden rush [in the Arab world],” he said.

The announcement by the six nations is a stunning reversal of policy in the Arab world, which had until recently been pressing for a nuclear free Middle East, where only Israel has nuclear weapons...

[h/t: Adam Holland]

Hamas is driving a hard bargain over Gilad Shalit

And here I thought that Hamas had no control over whoever's holding Gilad Shalit: Hamas Ups Shalit Demands

Cairo, 2 Nov. (AKI) - Ruling Palestinian Islamist group Hamas is demanding that Israel free 300-400 Palestinian women and minors before the release of Israeli solider Gilat Shalit - held by Hamas-linked militants for over four months - a senior Hamas official told pan-Arab daily al-Hayat. Imad al-Alami, head of a Hamas delegation currently in the Egyptian capital, Cairo, to discuss the prisoner swap, said that only once this stage is completed will Hamas release Shalit in exchange for an additional 1,000 Palestinian prisoners.

The demand represents a toughening of the group's demands and appears to create new obstacles for securing a deal on Shalit's release. It also contradicts comments on Wednesday by senior officials involved in talks to free Shalit that signficant progress had been made in negotations in Cairo between Hamas representatives and an Egyptian team headed by intelligence chief General Omar Suleiman.

East Jerusalem newspaper al-Quds also reported on Wednesday that progress had been made, saying Shalit would be released in exchange for over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners. A total 640 Palestinian prisoners would be freed from Israeli jails - including women and children - less than 48 hours after the transfer of Shalit to the Egyptian authorities. An additional 630 prisoners - some of whom have been detained for over 20 years- would be freed one to two months later, according to al-Quds.

Is one Israeli life worth the lives of over 1000 Palestinian Arabs? Apparently, in the view of all parties in the region, the answer is yes. I wonder if Wafa Samir al-Biss will be one of the "female political prisoners" that Hamas will want released (see: 'My dream was to be a suicide bomber. I wanted to kill 20, 50 Jews. Yes, even babies'). The answer is also, yes.

Haaretz also reports on the deal, here (scroll down).

Friday, November 3, 2006

Andover High Update -- Teachers Union and ACLU Dictate Curriculum (Long) -- Audio Update at End

Here are some very interesting updates on the situation happening at Andover High School (see: Propaganda Tour Arrives at Hamas High, Andover and Andover High Does the Right Thing - Updated (note comment thread there), and here's a general search that comes out with a lot of hits and info).

Here are some more print-media stories. Unfortunately, they tend to amplify the "free speech" angle, rather than the "truth over propaganda and radical politics for school kids" issue:

The Eagle-Tribune: Teacher:Speaker cancellation violates First Amendment

...Sarah Wunsch, a staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, wrote a letter to the School Department's lawyer Friday, saying Andover High students "should not be shielded from what some deem to be controversial views." Meyers distributed the letter to teachers yesterday morning...

The Jewish Advocate: Outrage at Andover High [I believe the entire article is only in the print edition]

...The Wheels of Justice, a group consisting of staunch critics of the U.S. and Israeli governments, were invited by six social studies teachers at the school to speak to 200 students about their experiences in Iraq, the West Bank and Gaza, according to Thomas Meyers, the president of the Andover Education Association and a social studies teacher at the school.

Through an attorney who spoke first to the Advocate, Principal Peter Anderson said that he did not cancel the event, but instead asked the Wheels of Justice to reschedule since he did not feel he had enough time to provide a balanced forum, according to Leonard H. Kesten, an attorney at Brody, Hardoon, Perkins & Kesten, LLP, in Boston. Kesten is representing the school committee and speaking on behalf of the principal and the superintendent.

“[The Wheels of Justice] was not canceled,” said Kesten. “The principal was not familiar with the group and he wanted to gather more information because quite a few concerns had been raised about the presentation. The principal offered to reschedule but the Wheels of Justice said it wasn’t possible.”...

Oh yes, the lawyers are now involved, and Andover residents can expect expense and tension thanks to the impropriety and questionable judgment of Physics teacher Ron Francis and union head Tom Meyers.

Continue reading "Andover High Update -- Teachers Union and ACLU Dictate Curriculum (Long) -- Audio Update at End"

Alert: FOX News to show Obsession the Movie this weekend

Fox News will be airing Obsession the Movie this weekend. If you haven't seen it, be sure to check it out. Here is the schedule:

An exclusive one hour special of Obsession will be aired on prime time this weekend on the Fox News Channel. Scheduled for Saturday night at 8 PM, 1 AM, and 5 AM, and Sunday at 4 PM and 10 PM EST, Director Wayne Kopping will be interviewed alongside a 40-minute version of the film.

WRKO Talk Host Gets Hook for Calling Chubby Lesbian Israel Bashing Terror-Supporter a Chubby Lesbian

...or something like that. Actually, no one seems quite sure exactly what he said.

So what's going on at WRKO? They've pulled talk host John DePetro for saying something rude about Green-Rainbow candidate Grace Ross. Apparently he referred to her weight and her sexual preferences [shudder] in a derogatory manner. This is news? A talk show guy behaving in a somewhat churlish manner?

That's it? When there's so much more to recommend her?

What does RKO want? Chris Lydon?

The Globe has the Caspar Milqetoast description, but rival talk host Michael Graham tells it like it is: The REAL Grace Ross Controversy

...As regular listeners know, I have refused to even say Ms. Ross's name on the air or discuss her candidacy in any way. It has nothing to do with her sexuality (who cares that she's a lesbian?) or her size (who cares that she is overweight?)

It has everything to do with her horrific politics. What should concern people is that she is openly anti-Semitic.

Until coming to Massachusetts, I'd never seen a televised debate featuring a candidate for a major office who attended pro-Hezbollah rallies. Or a candidate who went to memorial services commemorating the terrorist murderers of Black September.

Grace Ross's party, the GRP, does not believe Israel has the right to exist. In fact, their website labels Israel as an area "referred to by some people as Israel, the West Bank and Gaza."

No wonder Ms. Ross supports the complete divestiture of all American assets from Israel. She believes the victims of the suicide bombers and Hezbollah missiles are the REAL terrorists.

Here's my question: Who cares whether or not she needs Jenny Craig? She supports people who murder Jews! Hello--isn't that a significant political issue?...

[the rest!]

Michael, Michael, Michael...not in Massachusetts. Telling the TRUTH about Grace Ross and her party wouldn't be...nice. And here in Massachusetts, we'd much rather gloss the real issues and be nice than tell it like it is.

Oh, she's got crappy teeth, too.

Update: Hub Politics doesn't see the big deal either, and notes that DePetro has been fired.

Hamas Gunmen Hide Behind Women's Skirts

So many war crimes, so little time... Out of uniform (check) terrorists fire rockets at Israeli towns (check), take cover in a mosque (check), Hamas calls for human shields (check)...

Hamas "militants" holed-up in a mosque, whereupon Hamas radio put out a call for women to come and serve as human shields to try to get them out. Watch how AFP gushes over these Palestinian actions among their description of the usual activity of Palestinian use of civilian human shields for political gain:

Women act as human shields to free gunmen from Gaza mosque

BEIT HANUN, Gaza Strip (AFP) - Palestinian mothers and wives braved [you gotta be kidding] Israeli helicopter gunships to rescue 15 fighters besieged in a northern Gaza mosque, using their heavily veiled bodies as human shields.

"We risked our lives to free our sons," said Um Mohammed, a woman in her 40s, after the daring rescue that followed protests against a bloody Israeli operation in the northern Gaza Strip that has killed 24 Palestinians.

Militants from various armed groups, including Hamas, had been besieged in the al-Nasr mosque since Thursday, seeking protection from Operation Autumn Clouds, one of the biggest Israeli incursions in Gaza for the past four months.

Braving gunfire and tanks, around 400 women and other demonstrators gathered to protest [this is a protest? Protests usually involve carrying placards, not rescuing terrorists.] against the Israelis at one of the entrances to the town. Three of them, one a woman, were killed and another 25 people were wounded, medics said.

Around 200 women then left the main protest to march on and enter the mosque around 700 metres (yards) away to collect the gunmen, before walking out again, cloaking the fighters in the middle of their heavily veiled ranks. [They are now what's colloquially known as "targets".]

None of the gunmen could be seen amid the dozens of women, who were dressed for the most part from head to toe in black in the religiously conservative Gaza Strip.

Throughout the rescue bid, Israeli helicopter gunships opened fire -- not specifically at the women, but intending to scare them and separate their ranks, but without success. Two women were wounded, medics said.

A source in Hamas confirmed that its armed wing had orchestrated what he called a "complex security operation" to secure the release of the besieged fighters.

The women and fighters they were protecting ran as far as Izbat Beit Hanun, an area northwest of the town not being occupied by Israeli army.

"Hundreds of us entered the mosque and surrounded the resistance fighters to protect them," said one of the women, 21-year-old Nidaa al-Radih.

One rescued fighter was triumphant. "We are free, we are free!" he shouted before running off to safety...

Nice job, oh brave Hamas fighter. Women were killed and injured, but you managed to run away. Be proud.

Also see YNet: Palestinians: Gunmen flee besieged mosque

...Some 60 gunmen were reported to have fortified themselves inside the mosque late Thursday after the IDF began encircling the town as part of the operation to stop the launching of Qassam rockets from the area. Palestinian sources reported that the gunmen fired at the troops from within the windows of the mosque and that the IDF responded with stun grenades and teargas to try to force the gunmen to surrender...

...Military sources say that there were large amounts of arms inside the mosque, and that among the gunmen were several senior wanted Palestinians who headed the Qassam rocket infrastructure in northern Gaza...

And BBC: Gaza women 'die in mosque siege'

...Israeli military spokeswoman Avital Leibovich said: "We saw crowds of women. Behind the women hid some of the militants. Some of them were even dressed up as women: we have footage. [Which happens to be how Arafat escaped Beirut way back when.]

"Unfortunately because the militants shot at our forces, sometimes we had to respond."...

This is the nature of the enemy...where the civilian population makes themselves willing accomplices in active gunbattles.

Update: At It Shines For All: Worse Than Human Shields, They're Terrorist Helpers

...Those women were not innocent bystanders nor human shields caught in the wrong place at the wrong time. Human shields implies that they were reluctanly dragged in. They were willing terrorist helpers. They ran to protect terrorists in order that these terrorists could commit more killings. Those women are no different to those who help transport terrorists or those who hide terrorists in their home. They're responsible for any death and destruction the terrorists cause.

That the terrorists were willing to disguise themselves as women to escape, knowing full well if Israeli troops spotted them all the women would be endagered, shows just how much the terrorists care about their "civilians."

Thursday, November 2, 2006

Who's Coming Up For Tenure: Nadia Abu el-Haj

[Note: Update at end added 11/14/06]

[The following entry was prepared in cooperation with an academic who prefers to remain anonymous. I have a number of prior entries on Columbia University's Nadia Abu el-Haj, notably, Applauding the destruction of Joseph's Tomb at Columbia?, Across the Bay on Khalidi, Crisis at Columbia: Nadia Abu El-Haj, Columbia's Revisionist Anthropologist, Reviewing the work of the scholar who applauded the destruction of Joseph's Tomb -- Nadia Abu el-Haj, and An Academic Review of 'Facts on the Ground'.

All unfootnoted quotes are taken from el Haj's book, Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society. At the conclusion are appended some money quotes from three academic reviews. This is, I hope, to be one in a series of posts taking an in-depth look at some academics coming up for tenure in the near future.]

At Barnard College they are forming a committee to consider giving tenure to a young Palestinian anthropologist who advocates destroying archaeological sites for political purposes, and who has decided -- without regard to evidence -- that the ancient Israelite kingdoms were mere "myth."

Observers believe that she is very likely to receive tenure.

Abu El Haj rejects the right of the Jewish people to have a state. She vilifies Israel as an illegitimate, "colonial settler" enterprise. She has urged Columbia to "divest from all companies" that sell even defensive military supplies to Israel. In 2002 she condemned Israel in advance for an "ethnic cleansing" of Palestinians during the Iraq war -- an event that was never planned and never occurred.

Her bid for tenure will be based on a single book, Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society. In it she denies that the ancient Jewish or Israelite kingdoms existed.

"What was considered to have been ancient Jewish national existence and sovereignty in their homeland" is "a tale best understood as the modern nation's origin myth… transported into the realm of history." The Hasmonean and Davidic dynasties are a mere "belief," an "ideological assertion," a "pure political fabrication."

Although it may seen incredible that a book could commit a more flagrant violation of scholarly standards than to dismiss the vast body of archaeological and documentary evidence for the existence of the ancient Jewish and Israelite kingdoms, Abu El Haj manages to do so when she excuses the deliberate destruction of archaeological sites when it is done by Palestinians for political purposes. In Abu El Haj's view, deliberately destroying ancient buildings is not to be condemned, it is to be "analyzed as a form of resistance to the Israeli state."

The deliberate destruction of archaeological artifacts, "Needs to be understood in relation to a colonial-national history in which modern political rights have been substantiated in and expanded through the material signs of historic presence. In destroying the tomb, Palestinian demonstrators eradicated one 'fact on the ground."

Abu El Haj's scorn for evidence-based scholarship is explicit. In her own words, she writes within a scholarly tradition that "Reject(s) a positivist commitment to scientific methods…" Rather, her work is "rooted in… post structuralism, philosophical critiques of foundationalism, Marxism and critical theory… and developed in response to specific postcolonial political movements."

This, apparently, entitles her to write about Israeli archaeology with no respect for the inconvenient evidence presented by mountains of ostraca, numerous inscribed stele, and all those large, well-documented tells. And to write an anthropology of a society, Israel, which she has visited only briefly and whose language she does not speak.

Continue reading "Who's Coming Up For Tenure: Nadia Abu el-Haj"

Project Valour-IT

I've joined the Navy Team (which is funny, since I get seasick on whale watches). What is Project Valour-IT?

Project Valour-IT
(Voice-Activated Laptops for OUR Injured Troops)
In memory of SFC William V. Ziegenfuss

Every cent raised for Project Valour-IT goes directly to the purchase and shipment of voice-activated laptops for wounded servicemembers. As of October 2006, Valour-IT has distributed nearly 600 laptops to severely wounded Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines across the country.

During its initial phase, Valour-IT created "libraries" of laptops equipped with voice-controlled software for the severely wounded staying at major military medical centers. In many cases a laptop was provided to a wounded hero for permanent use.

Valour-IT is continuing to accept donations of any amount to supply the "libraries" of laptops at major medical centers and gifts to individuals, but has also added the option of an individual or organization directly sponsoring a wounded soldier by completely funding the cost of a laptop and continuing to provide him or her with personal support and encouragement throughout recovery. This has proved to be an excellent project for churches, groups of coworkers or friends, and members of community organizations such Boy Scouts...

Go HERE and make a donation to the NAVY team.

And that gives me another chance to post a second cool military pic of the day:

Somerville Divestment Update -- Vote NO on 5 and 6 Effort -- Free web stream of The Forgotten Refugees

Here's an update on where things stand with regard to the two questions on the Somerville, MA ballot with regard to divestment and "right of return." (see previous posts: Would You Buy What These Guys Are Selling? Somerville Divestment is Back., Somerville Divestment Update -- Green Party is On Board and Speaking of Somerville Divestment...)

The Somerville Journal has endorsed a NO vote on both questions:

Question 5: Support the right of return for all refugees - No

Cloaking the dissolution of the state of Israel in the clothing of human rights is just deceitful. If you want a policy debate, so be it, but let us at least acknowledge that there is more to the problems in the Middle East than can be solved by nonbinding ballot questions.

Question 6: Divest from Israel, those supplying military equipment to Israel - No

Once again, this a more complicated question than suggesting we shouldn't fund military equipment in Israel. On one hand, just like when the divestment of retired city employee pensions was at issue, the retirement boards managing this money are duty-bound to find good investments for its charges. If that is General Electric which makes MRI beds for hospitals as well as electronics that could be used elsewhere, so be it. On the other, this question is a simplification of an issue in the Middle East. Go ahead and have a policy debate, but we fear there is more lurking in this issue than an anti-war stance. Why, for instance, are we not being asked to question investment in any other hot spot?

The Journal also has an article on the issue, here: Ballot has city taking sides, again

A vicious battle is again erupting in Somerville involving a not-so-local issue: the Middle East.

Unlike a lot of the other ballot questions next Tuesday, question 5 - a nonbinding resolution asking the federal government to support the right of all refugees, including Palestinian refugees, to return "home" - will have Somervillians grappling at an issue they’ve seen before.

Two years ago, members of the Somerville Divestment Project tried unsuccessfully to get the city’s retirement board to stop investing in companies that do business with Israel...

...Haber, Brociner and others have accused the Somerville Divestment Project members of being anti-Israel and even of anti-Semitism, something members deny.

"That term sucks," said Bob Cable, a divestment and right-of-return proponent. "Some of our supporters are Jewish. The Jews, Arabs and Christians could live peacefully. I have great respect for Jews as intellectuals, as social justice activists and baseball players. I would actually prefer the Jews in Israel live in the U.S." [Ah, the casual call for ethnic cleansing of the pro-divestment folk...]

Cable touted the support of Neturei Karta, a group of anti-Zionist Orthodox rabbis based in New York. But on the other side, politicians such as Mayor Joe Curtatone have not taken lightly to the divestment group’s initiative.

"They do nothing to promote real dialogue, peace or justice either here in Somerville or in the Middle East," Curtatone said recently. "They represent a wasteful and inappropriate use of the ballot initiative system, and I strongly oppose them."...

The Anti-divestment forces now have their own Web site, here: somervillepeace.org. The group is showing the very important film The Forgotten Refugees at the Somerville Theater tonight, but you can watch the film for free on the web until November 8th. The instructions for doing so are on this page.

Jon Haber has an excellent essay debunking one of the SDP's favorite tactics, out of context quotations, here: Quotes

Theo van Gogh -- Two Years On

Jeff Jacoby: Scenes from the jihad

Congratulations to Jeff Jacoby for telling it like it is. Scenes from the jihad

A HALF-DOZEN snapshots from the global jihad:

Australia: Australia's foremost Muslim cleric triggers an uproar when he likens women who don't wear an Islamic headscarf to "uncovered meat" and blames them for attracting sexual predators. "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or the park . . . and the cats come and eat it," says Sheik Taj al-Din Hilali, "whose fault is it, the cats' or the uncovered meat? If [the woman] was in her room, in her home, in her headscarf, no problem would have occurred."

Afghanistan: The kidnappers of Italian photojournalist Gabriele Torsello threaten to murder him unless Abdul Rahman, an Afghan Christian convert, is returned to Afghanistan and handed over to an Islamic court. Rahman lives in Italy, which granted him asylum earlier this year, when he faced the death penalty under Afghanistan's sharia law for converting from Islam to Christianity.

Iran: The president of Iran calls Israel "a group of terrorists" and threatens to harm any country that supports the Jewish state. "This is an ultimatum," warns Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for the elmination of Israel and the United States. "Don't complain tomorrow." Days later, the deputy director of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization confirms another stride forward for the country's illicit nuclear program: With the injection of gas into a second cascade of centrifuges, Iran has doubled its uranium-enrichment capacity.

Thailand: Islamist terrorists bomb a column of Buddhist monks as they collect offerings of food in Narathiwat, a city in southern Thailand. One person is killed; 12 are injured. The attack is the latest in a bloody week that has included multiple shootings and another fatal bombing.

France: Another Muslim intifadah rages in France...

There's more, but it's not all bad news.

Cool Military Pic of the Day

Wednesday, November 1, 2006

If you can see this entry...

...it means that you are probably viewing this site on its new server. Things may still be (are) flaky, however, so please continue to bear with me. Please continue to send mail that can't wait to martinsolomon -at- gmail daught com.

I have imported the finest trained fleas to work the bugs out, but their little hearts are sensitive, so let's cut them some slack.

Update 5:15pm: All should be well, including email. Please inform me of any difficulties or glitches you notice at my regular solomon at solomonia daught com address. Back to regular blogging shortly...

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]