Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Speaking of David Rolde, and other sign-holding fools, it's time to update on some of the latest happenings around the Somerville Divestment Project. (see previous: Would You Buy What These Guys Are Selling? Somerville Divestment is Back.)

Remember that this time out, the SDP has narrowed their goals and has gone for trying to get two non-binding questions passed by the voters in a single state congressional district. The questions will be on the ballot, one concerning divestment, the other concerning "right of return." Since the word "divestment" generally and the name of the SDP in particular are basically mud in Somerville due to the group's past antics, they have focussed their efforts around the right of return issue and remained quiet on divestment, couching their plea for a yes vote, unsurprisingly, in the language of human rights. The Jewish Advocate has a good summary article today: Voters to face anti-Israel questions in Somerville

During the Nov. 7 elections, Somerville will become the battleground for Palestinian rights...

...The first question posed to voters by the SDP calls on [State Rep.] Provost to issue a statement on behalf of Massachusetts that would support the Right of Return for all refugees, including Palestinian refugees, to their land of return. The second question asks voters if they support government entities in Massachusetts divesting from Israeli bonds or in companies supplying military equipment to Israel.

Provost said that she would consult a private counsel to discuss her obligation if the voters support the measures, noting that she feels like she does not have enough authority to make decisions on Israeli and Palestinian relations...

The national Green Party, which has been taken over in large part by anti-Semites and people against Jewish self-determination, has endorsed both questions. There is, of course, a large and notable cross-over in membership between groups like the local Green-Rainbow Party, Al-Awda (the Right to Return coalition), the New England Committee to Defend Palestine and other radical groups.

For instance, SDP is the pet project of Andover High School teacher and former GRP co-chair, Ron Francis, who, in a letter to the Somerville Journal typically full of out of context quotes and distortions, wrote (not online):

...The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their homelands is a fundamental injustice of the 20th century which must be dealt with sooner or later. Our country, which purports to stand for "freedom and justice for all" cannot continue to support the Israeli apartheid system of government which today has laws that deny basic rights based on race, and historically was built on the ethnic cleansing of one group for the benefit of another.

This has prompted some eloquent responses, like that from a former student, Eric Danis:

Ron Francis, one of my former teachers at Andover High School, attempted to place all of the blame for the Middle East conflict on the Jews of Israel in his recent letter to the editor of this newspaper. Francis claims to care about re-settling refugees, but not once in his letter did he mention the hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees who were forced out of Muslim countries in the late 1940's. Francis also frequently notes that Israel is a Jewish country, but he never mentions the fact that the Palestinians have officially adopted Islamic law as part of their constitution, or that Hamas, an Islamic fundamentalist party, is the ruling party of the Palestinians. These double standards, along with Francis' refusal to condemn Palestinian terrorism, illustrates Francis' tremendous bias against, and hatred for, Israel.

Additionally, potential Francis supporters in Somerville should know that Francis has made it very clear several times that he is working toward the goal of destroying Israel, and that he has often used anti-Semitic canards and language to promote this goal...

And this, from Somerville resident Jon Haber, who's site, Somerville ME Justice, tracks the issue and is well worth checking for its thoughtful essays:

Notably missing from last week's long, one-sided account of the Arab refugee issue was the word "divestment," an interesting omission, given that the author is the discredited leader of the Somerville Divestment Project which has been trying for three years to drag the Middle East conflict into the city of Somerville.

Having failed to sneak divestment past the aldermen in 2004, and having refused to obey the law when trying to get onto the citywide ballot in 2005, the 2006 edition of their perennially losing campaign took advantage of lenient district requirements to get two questions: one on divestment, one on refugees (the so-called "Right of Return") onto the November ballot of a single district, the Middlesex 27...

Here's another good letter, from Somerville resident Philip Moss:

...In the past few years, churches, universities and other institutions have rejected divestment by a large margin. In our own city, the Board of Alderman, Mayor Curtatone, and Somerville's state and federal congressional delegations have also been firmly against divestment. Is the failure of divestment the reason why SDP has decided to focus this year's campaign of deception on the so-called "right of return," hoping to introduce the most divisive, bloody issue in the entire Middle East conflict into the streets and squares of Somerville?

If divestment has been so soundly opposed, why does the SDP continue its campaigns? One need look no further than the SDP's own Web site to understand that they are motivated by an unmitigated hatred of Israel, a multiracial, multicultural democracy in a region of brutal dictatorships and autocracies. In regard to Gaza, where Israel unilaterally ended its occupation in hopes of furthering peace, SDP ludicrously claims that a genocide is occurring. While sane people have labeled Hamas a terrorist organization - and rightly so as they have intentionally killed more than 500 civilians including 27 Americans - SDP defends Hamas as being unfairly maligned by the media...

The fight goes on...

3 Comments

This is a "canary in the coal mine issue". If it passes in Somerville, it will elsewhere as well. And once it passes in municipalities, how long before county and state governments are pushed to follow? The dominoes are falling, my friends, and it is a scary sight indeed..........

A single state legislative district. Not a congressional district.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]