Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Spengler: Why Israel is the world's happiest country
Israelis have a high life-expectancy and birth-rate and a low suicide rate. Spengler says this demonstrates hope and happiness:

Envy surrounds no country on Earth like the state of Israel, and with good reason: by objective measures, Israel is the happiest nation on Earth at the 60th anniversary of its founding. It is one of the wealthiest, freest and best-educated; and it enjoys a higher life expectancy than Germany or the Netherlands. But most remarkable is that Israelis appear to love life and hate death more than any other nation. If history is made not by rational design but by the demands of the human heart, as I argued last week , the light heart of the Israelis in face of continuous danger is a singularity worthy of a closer look.
Can it be a coincidence that this most ancient of nations [1], and the only nation persuaded that it was summoned into history for God's service, consists of individuals who appear to love life more than any other people? As a simple index of life-preference, I plot the fertility rate versus the suicide rate of 35 industrial countries, that is, the proportion of people who choose to create new life against the proportion who choose to destroy their own. Israel stands alone, positioned in the upper-left-hand-quadrant, or life-loving, portion of the chart [2]. Those who believe in Israel's divine election might see a special grace reflected in its love of life...
Amazing contrast with the state's enemies, as Spengler notes:
...Israel is surrounded by neighbors willing to kill themselves in order to destroy it. "As much as you love life, we love death," Muslim clerics teach; the same formula is found in a Palestinian textbook for second graders. Apart from the fact that the Arabs are among the least free, least educated, and (apart from the oil states) poorest peoples in the world, they also are the unhappiest, even in their wealthiest kingdoms...
As always, Spengler has much else to say that is interesting.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Monday, May 12, 2008
Hezbollah and the media
At MJT's, Lee Smith conveys a report from a friend and colleague in Lebanon, Elie Fawaz, who says:
“So, we know that Hezbollah's well-trained fighters are in control of most of west Beirut. The decision taken by Walid Jumblat and Saad al-Hariri not to fight back in Beirut, but rather hand most of their positions to the army ended any illusion regarding the sanctity of the “resistance” - that it would never turn its weapons inward, for now its hands are dripping with the blood of innocent Lebanese. But it's different in the Chouf where Jumblatt's forces bloodied Hezbollah.
However, according to Associated Press reporter Bassem Mroue, Hezbollah's show of force in Beirut was only temporarily marred by fighting between "government supporters and opponents in Lebanon"
The fighting in the town of Chouweifat calmed late Sunday after Druse leader Walid Jumblatt called on his Druse opponents, who are allied with Hezbollah, to mediate a cease-fire and hand over the region to Lebanese troops.
Iran's state-run Press TV reported on its Web site that 17 opposition fighters were killed in the mountain clashes. It did not elaborate, and the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia refused to comment.
Officials could not immediately provide casualty figures from other mountain towns where fighting also raged a day earlier. But the latest deaths pushed to 54 the number of people killed since violence erupted Wednesday, in the worst internal clashes since the end of the 1975-90 civil war.
The AP report features this photograph and caption, which give the impression that Jumblatt's forces lost the battle.

A Druse woman, Yessra Halawi, reacts after her house burned Sunday during clashes between pro-government supporters of Druse leader Walid Jumblatt and Shiite gunmen and their allies in Chouweifat, south of Beirut, Lebanon, Monday May 12, 2008. Lebanese soldiers deployed across mountains overlooking the Lebanese capital Monday after at least 11 people were killed in fierce clashes between pro-Syrian gunmen and government supporters entrenched in the hilly plateau, security officials and paramedics said. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)
But Fawaz reports that:
..“After taking over West Beirut, Hezbollah tried to move to the Shouf, where there are two Shiite towns, Kayfoun and Qmatiyye. Hezbollah is trying to link them up to the Dahieh through the Karameh road, which links Dahieh to Choueifat-Aramoun-Doha-Deir Qoubel-Aytat-Kayfoun and Qmatiye, so that it can make encroachments, maintain access routes and not allow the Druze to surround the two Shiite towns.
“That was the plan, but Hezbollah got a severe beating in the Shouf. They were not able to penetrate anything, relying instead - for the first time in the current fighting - on artillery/mortar fire. To no avail. Yesterday alone we heard that seven Hezbollah fighters who tried to infiltrate got killed.
I wonder why Iran's state-run Press TV and Hezbollah militia didn't want to go into the details...
AP reporter Mroue boasts that:
In contrast, Fawaz concludes:
Fawaz does not claim to be presenting the news from a completely unbiased point of view. But AP does. Thousands of media outlets present these AP reports to their readers, as if they were written and photographed by unbiased journalists. They're not.
It's no secret that Hezbollah has a history of orchestrating and blatantly staging media reports. Looks like they're doing it again. I wouldn't be surprised if Flat Fatima is getting a call from her agent right now.

Brian Ledbetter at Snapped Shot has been keeping track of Hezbollah's media manipulations. He says:
In an insightful article written for Reason Magazine, Michael Young says:
If Western journalists are telling their editors that Hezbollah sources are 'closed', or hard to reach, they're telling more tall tales. I traveled to Beirut in Dec. 2006 (when Hezbollah was just threatening to take over the airport). I had never been to the Middle East before, it was my first hour there, and I looked every bit like the American soccer mom I am. Although I told the taxi driver who took me to my hotel I was a tourist, he told me that I was a reporter and he offered to take me on a guided tour of the Hezbollah-controlled areas in the south.
When we drove past a poster of Nasrallah, the taxi driver proudly said ‘there’s the man’. I assumed he was working with, or at least friendly to, Hezbollah. I didn't go on his tour, partly because he overcharged me for the ride to my hotel.
In my experience, Hezbollah is about as ‘closed’ to western reporters as City Line double decker tours are to tourists arriving in New York City. Check it out, check it out.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Johann Hari Saw a Pipe, and Robert Fisk Cheers for the Enemies of Civilization
End of last month The Independent's columnist Johann Hari wrote a calumny against Israel, quoting Ilan Pappe, no less, as an authority on the state's founding. Now personally, I happen to think that it's not unlikely that Hari simply wanted an excuse to use the word "shit" in the pages of a major publication -- oh how British English standards have fallen.
See, sewage is a problem in the West Bank. One may jump to various conclusions on the causes. The most obvious is the one we've noted many times here for the lack of a decent civil infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza -- because a lot of people have been more interested in stuffing their pockets, paying out graft, building McMansions, funding terror groups and dreaming of destroying the Zionist Entity than they have been interested in building a fully functional civil society.
Now, I don't discount the possibility that some Jews living in the West Bank may actually be callously, even intentionally pumping their poop out over the fence and into their neighbor's yard. I don't know. I'm not an expert, and I can only go by what smells right and what doesn't.
Thing is, same with Johann Hari, even though he, after all, informs us with all vehemence that he smelled the shit! He smelt it! It filled his nostrils says Hari, and, fortunate for him, why he had a Palestinian expert there to guide him on his odor-rama adventure and explain just whose fault it all was. No prize for guessing whose...
Honest Reporting, among others, called him out on the many problematic issues with his piece, and our man Johann was none-too-pleased to be criticized. Seems it's all a big conspiracy by you-know-who to silence columnists. After all, he was only being "critical," how dare he be criticized in turn? The nerve of those Je...people! Honest Reporting has come back with another response, taking on Hari's claims to persecution (and Jews know persecution Johann, and this ain't it).
In fact, Hari's colleague at The Independent, Howard Jacobson came back with his own rejoinder:
...to invoke the spectre of a campaign, a front mobilised with aforethought to defame anyone who speaks ill of Israel. Indeed, accusing your detractors of carrying out a campaign often amounts to carrying out one in return - for it is a smear in itself to accuse people who disagree with you of acting out of no other motive than malice. He who says I smear him when I don't smears me.
Something else doesn't feel quite right to me about Johann Hari's unearthing of this "campaign", and that is his assertion that "it is an attempt to intimidate and silence - and to a large degree it works". To my ear, that answers intimidation with intimidation, since it impugns the intellectual honour of those of whom he speaks, and coerces us into thinking the worst of them.
Furthermore, it is patently untrue that "intimidation" has worked. Johann himself is demonstrably not intimidated. Nor is it easy to see who else is. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, it cannot surely be argued that the Palestinian case is not heard...
Funny thing, that. It would seem quite natural for a flawed thesis, perhaps disgracefully flawed, delivered in unmeasured tones as Hari's was, to meet with a like response. In fact, given Hari's original, I'd say the response was muted in comparison. Seems quite natural for any group, not just a national or religious group neither, to rise to their own defense, or others who know the truth or are at least ready to be honest to do likewise on their behalf, and Jews have labored long and hard to master the intellectual Western traditions -- gained great notoriety at universities, founded them, even -- and have cast the critical eye inward perhaps more than any other People.
Yet here they go, speaking out, and no matter how factual their argument, no matter how reasoned their defense, no matter how justified their indignation, or studied their positions...and they're still just saying that because...well, they would, they're Jews after all. It's all a bit exasperating.
People become upset about some of the "criticisms" printed against Israel because some of those criticisms aren't criticisms at all, they're smears. Smears from a sewer. And some of us have gotten past the ghetto Jew (or the silence of the country club token if you prefer) mentality and we will speak our minds about what we hear. It ain't a conspiracy, you're not being silenced, and Mr. Johann Hari will just have to lump it.
There is a collective I claim full membership in, however, and that's the American collective, such as it is, and that brings me to Robert Fisk, who only belongs as a part of this entry in so far as he is another colleague of Hari's. He's penned some poop of his own about what's going on in Beirut: Hizbollah rules west Beirut in Iran's proxy war with US. Here are the bits that caught my eye:
...The Lebanese army watches the Hizbollah road-blocks. And does nothing. As a Tehran versus Washington conflict, Iran has won, at least for now. Walid Jumblatt, the Druze leader and MP and a pro-American supporter of Mr Siniora's government, is isolated in his home in west Beirut, but has not been harmed. The same applies to Saad Hariri, one of the most prominent government MPs and the son of the murdered former prime minister Rafik Hariri. He remains in his west Beirut palace in Koreitem, guarded by police and soldiers but unable to move without Hizbollah's approval. The symbolism is everything.
When Hamas became part of the Palestinian government, the West rejected it. So Hamas took over Gaza. When the Hizbollah became part of the Lebanese government, the Americans rejected it. Now Hizbollah has taken over west Beirut...
Fisk means it all as an insult, that's how I take it. You can almost see the smirk as he types it. We support the wrong guys, the unpopular guys and that's why they lose. Or maybe he means it that because we're involved, the guys we support become unpopular and then they lose.
In any case, I take his list as a sort of point of pride. Our guys are set back because we, and they, aren't as ruthless as the people we both stand against. That's a consequence of who we are -- that is, we are not the murdering rampaging colossus of the posh post-colonial theorists and their wild fantasies. That's why we are, in fact, the good guys more often than not. And our friends are our friends precisely because they match up with our own values. Do we support bad guys from time to time? Yes, but only out of the necessity born of the least bad of a series of bad options, and sometimes we lose because, in order to keep our support, those bad guys are less bad than they'd otherwise be and may need to be to live in their worlds.
Iran, Syria, Hizballah, Hamas...they have no such limitations. They are as ruthless as ruthless can be, and a feckless West lets them get away with it, and our allies suffer for it. So I'll take Fisk's list as a repudiation of Fisk's anti-American mind-set, and a point of pride.
As I write this, another excellent piece comes through my inbox by Barry Rubin which makes this point and more:
...The "best" are often too innocent indeed, sunk in constant self-criticism, persuading themselves they must atone for having done too much in the past by doing nothing in the present, trying to convince the other side of their niceness and sensitivity. Their priority is to ensure no one will accuse them of being imperialistic. And to prove it they will let another country fall into the enemy camp...
...While Iran and Syria provide guns and strong backing to their friends, the West responds with words backed by nothing. Who can blame Hizballah and Damascus and Tehran for laughing with contempt, believing they are the tide of the future, assuming their "passionate intensity" will inevitably triumph over the weak-willed West?
The historic great powers act as pitiful, helpless giants but their enemies will take no pity on them...
...Why should Lebanese Sunni, Druze, and Christians risk their lives when the West doesn't help them? Every Israeli speaking nonsense about Syria making peace; every American claiming Damascus might split from Tehran; every European preaching appeasement has in fact been engaged in confidence-breaking measures...
I'm proud of what we are, though it occasionally be a weakness. We do need to wake up and win in spite of ourselves once in awhile, though.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Lay Off the Video Games
I'm talking to you, politicians. Andrew Ian Dodge agrees: Stop Picking on Video Games - and Video Gamers
Politicians are always looking for an edge to be seen to be doing something; especially if it involves children. Never is it more likely that during an election year or the lead up to a general election. Politicians all over the Anglosphere are eyeing the video game industry with ill intent.
US government leaders examining slapping extra taxes on game transactions, justified by the supposed link between video games with violent behavior - which also bolsters the cries for censorship. The latter is occuring despite the fact there is evidence that video games do not lend themselves to encouraging bad behavior. There is a recent study shows that video game paranoids are completely off base...
Damn right they are. So, anyone playing anything interesting out there? I downloaded Trackmania Nations through Steam a couple of weeks ago. It's a free racing game. Nifty graphics and a very short learning curve. Good for jumping online for a quick run or two. Before that I was playing STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl -- graphics are getting a bit dated, but it's a pretty cool RPG/shooter in a setting that has the playing dodging radiation and mutants in a futuristic Chernobyl forbidden zone.
Too bad Counter Strike isn't as big as it used to be. I can imagine getting together on a server full of horrid war bloggers for a little CT (and T) action. Also too bad Armed Assault: Combat Operations never really caught on, since I can imagine the same thing there as well.
So many good games: IL2 1946 for WW2 flying in all theaters, Lock On for modern air combat, Combat Mission: Afrika Korps for PBEM WW2 tactics, Medieval II: Total War for strategic and tactical medieval combat, Battlefield 2 for easy modern combat...on and on and on...most have real-time voice communication built in and allow for the use of a little brain power. I doubt any of them will turn an otherwise even slightly off-balance personality into a psycho killer.
Hey, there's nothing wrong with a little Mario Kart for the Wii, heck, I just rented a copy, it's fun for the whole family, but let's have some games with a little verisimilitude, too.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Jeff Jacoby: A triumph of life and hope
Jeff Jacoby writes in today's Globe on the secular miracle that is modern Israel: A triumph of life and hope
...all the generations of dispersion that followed, the Jews never lost their self-awareness as a nation or their connection to the land of Israel. They expressed their longing for it in daily prayer and turned toward it when they worshiped. They collected charity to support the minority of Jews who had never left the land; and over the years others made their way back as well, often in response to Christian or Muslim persecution. By the 1860s, a majority of Jerusalem's population was Jewish once more. Zionism - an organized movement to renew Jewish independence in the Jewish homeland - was formally launched in 1897. Five decades later, against steep odds and every historical precedent, Israel was reborn.
It was an incredible achievement, made even more incredible by the fact that it occurred in the wake of a genocide that had wiped out one-third of the Jewish people...
Of course, this being the Globe, it's unacceptable to put in a piece that celebrates Israel without being equivocal about it, so they give equal space to an official of the smash-Israel anti-ADL, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, to talk about something called Nakba: For Palestians [sic], mourning. If Arabs spent 1/2 the energy actually building a state rather than lamenting the one they never had and trying to dismantle the one someone else built (jealous, jealous), they wouldn't need to keep writing these types of essays.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Charles Jacobs: A Major Re-Think
This piece, in full below, appears at David Project founder Charles Jacobs' blog, as well as this week's Jewish Advocate:
Merely listening to Hamas should be enough to convince anyone that the Jewish state is seen by major segments of the Muslim world as a theological affront to Islam.
But the myth that the conflict is secular and solely related to real estate is deeply held. That’s understandable: Who wants to think that the Jews survived Christian theological hatred in Europe to find themselves at the center of a murderous Islamic hate-storm? A "border war with locals" feels so much better. It’s a palliative, a soporific.
There is a sign, however, that Israelis are beginning to re-think this matter. The Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, a research unit unofficially associated with the Israeli intelligence services, recently released an important report entitled 'Contemporary Arab-Muslim anti-Semitism, its Significance and Implications.'
Continue reading "Charles Jacobs: A Major Re-Think"DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Life in Sderot
Here's an excellent first-hand account from a young person coming to grips with a civilian population dealing with the random violence of living in a war zone: Life in Sderot.
Like a real-life modern Lottery, some day people will write short stories about a population sitting about accepting that one of them gets picked off once in awhile and they do nothing about it though they have the strength to put a stop to it. It's surreal.
No wonder a youthful mind is thrown off balance by it.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Is Gaza the Prussia of the Middle East?
A guest post by Alexander Maistrovoy, a journalist with the Russian-language Israeli newspaper Novosty Nedely:
Drang nach Osten: In the name of Allah!
Had anyone of the European monarchs, grandees or pontifices of the XVth century ever heard a word "Prussia"? Unlikely. Stuck in the Baltic bogs between Russia and Poland, Prussia, the miserable successor to the Teutonic Order, the obedient vassal of proud Poland (Rech Pospolita), hopelessly vegetated in the boondocks of Europe. Could anyone imagine that in two centuries Prussia would become one of the main players on the European arena, initiate the two most terrible wars in history and claim world hegemony? However, skeptics would not consider three important circumstances: the belligerence and vigor of Prussians, their support by a boundless Russian empire and the favor of Fortune, whose whims can never be predicted.
By the beginning of the XVIIth century the House of Hohenzollern had united with Brandenburg, skillfully combining military discipline and intrigues. The bridge to Europe had been thrown over Poland. The capital of the new formation was moved from Keninsberg to Berlin; a steady absorption of Germany by Prussia (interrupted by the Napoleonic wars) began: Hanover, Gessen, Nassau, Schleswig-Holstein, and Frankfurt-on-Main.
At that time democratic Poland which was torn apart by the petty ambition of its dukes, and endured one disaster after another: it was tormented by Swedes, Turks, Cossacks, and Russians. The Polish cavalry was the most irrepressible in Europe, but the democracy of the country had turned into a parody to itself. Polish dukes squandered the state treasury on ridiculous follies - from love affairs to alchemical experiences.
Great European powers did not feel any danger. They indulged the fall of Poland, not understanding that they themselves had lined up to become a predator’s dinner. Austria, and then France were defeated by Prussia. United by Teutons, Germany dominates over Europe. The next step was the possession of the whole world: the First World War, then Nazism and the Second World War.
Continue reading "Is Gaza the Prussia of the Middle East?"DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Friday, May 9, 2008
Daniel Pipes and Yaron Brook on the Threat of Totalitarian Islam (Video)
Last Tuesday night I joined a fairly full house at Emerson Hall at Harvard to see Daniel Pipes, Yaron Brook and Robert Spencer give a talk on "The Threat of Totalitarian Islam." Robert Spencer was ill and couldn't make it, which was unfortunate since he's a very good speaker and very good at responding to questions and I would have enjoyed seeing how the college crowd reacted to him.
Both Pipes and Brook opened with short statements of under ten minutes each, then the floor was quickly opened to questions. That part of the program ran well over an hour and formed the meat of the event.
Security was tight and no banners or disruptions were allowed. The audience ranged from polite to outright friendly, with challenging questioners receiving only a smattering of applause from the back of the hall while the responses from Brook and Pipes outdid the negativity. No protesters were on hand. I'm also guessing that the majority of the audience was from off campus.
This Objectivist blogger has a good review of the event. Pipes was careful and studied as always, and Brook, president of the Ayn Rand Institute and someone I've never seen speak before, wasn't quite as glib as one might expect considering the number of speaking engagements he performs at. Still and all, both did well.
Most questioners did well staying to concise statements before asking their questions, though one young Muslim fellow was shouted down by the audience into finally getting to asking a question. I was told he was spotted later complaining to the police officers on hand that his right to free speech had been violated -- hey, I just report what I heard. Our own Joachim Martillo was on hand to get his turn at the mic. When I post the video of the Q&A I'll let you guess which one he was.
Here is the video of the two opening statements. I will update this post with the much longer video of the Q&A when I have it ready, probably some time tomorrow -- uploading and encoding will take some time due to file size. [Update: Second video now up.]
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Former Jordanian Minister Vows to Conquer Spain and Rome and Declares: America and the EU Will Soon Come to an End (Video)
He's on Hamas TV, but he's Jordanian. You know, the moderate guys. The mind-set of this guy is why there's a conflict, and why all the hasbara, the charity work, the Voices of America, the Human Rights groups and efforts won't stop it. They're irrelevant.
Following are excerpts from an interview with Sheik Ali Al-Faqir, former Jordanian minister of religious endowment, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on May 2, 2008.
Sheik Ali Al-Faqir: We must declare that Palestine, from the [Jordan] River to the [Mediterranean] Sea, is an Islamic land, and that Spain - Andalusia - is also the land of Islam. Islamic lands that were occupied by the enemies will once again become Islamic. Furthermore, we will reach beyond these countries, which are lost at one point. We proclaim that we will conquer Rome, like Constantinople was conquered once, and as it will be conquered again.
Interviewer: Allah willing.
Sheik Ali Al-Faqir: We will rule the world, as has been said by the Prophet Muhammad...
...We will face a battlefront that is broader and stronger. Its beginnings were in Palestine, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and in Chechnya. What has begun will be completed. It will not stop...
...The Zionist entity reached completion, and it is beginning to decline, until it will wane and come to its end. Similarly, America has occupied, thundered, and foamed with rage, and proclaimed, like Pharoah, "I am your supreme God," but it will come to its end, and they have begun to realize that their end is near. We have begun to read in American and European newspapers that "our glory is on the wane, and there is nothing we can do about it." This morning on Al-Jazeera TV, I saw American scientists and strategic theoreticians, who said that America would soon come to its end. They said it before about the USSR, and, indeed, it has come to its end, and we say now that America and the EU will come to an end, and only the rising force of Islam will prevail.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Car of Bedouin woman who lit Independence Day torch set on fire
Now, who might have done this to this patriotic non-Jewish family? Was it a group of racist Israeli Jews seeking to drive them out, or was it, do you suppose, their Arab neighbors resentful of their sense of belonging to what is, after all, their country?
Bedouin lighter of 60th anniversary torch suffers ironic twist of fate as her car is torched by unknown persons. Celebratory torch and car torching connected, husband says
Sana Elbaz, the daughter of a Bedouin family from Tel Sheva who lit a celebratory torch at Israel's 60th anniversary ceremony in Jerusalem, saw her car set ablaze by unknown persons outside of her house on Thursday night. A molotov cocktail was also thrown at her door, but her house remained undamaged...
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
25 Most Influential Conservatives?
According to a blogospheric opinion poll. The fact that the first politician doesn't appear until #14, and taking into account who that politician is, shows how much trouble the domestic conservative movement has. If none of your policy inspirations come from the class of people who can actually inspire enough people in one area to elect them to a job then no wonder you have problems.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
A Gulf in Giving: Oil-Rich States Starve the World Food Program
Guess who the biggest donor is, and guess who gave (or didn't give) at the office:
...WFP [World Food Program] internal documents show that the major oil producing nations of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) gives almost nothing to the food organization, even as skyrocketing oil prices and swollen oil revenues contribute to the very crisis that the U.N. claims could soon add 100 million more people to the world’s starving masses.
The overwhelming bulk of the burden in feeding the world’s starving poor remains with the United States and a small group of other predominately Western nations, a situation that the WFP has done little so far to change, even as it has asked for another $775 million in donations to ease the crisis.
Donor listings on WFP’s website show that this year, as in every year since 1999, the U.S. is far and away the biggest aid provider to WFP. Since 2001, U.S. donations to the food agency have averaged more than $1.16 billion annually -- or more than five times as much as the next biggest donor, the European Commission.
This year, the U.S. had contributed $362.7 million to WFP just through May 4, according to the website. That figure does not include another $250 million above the planned yearly contribution that was promised by President George W. Bush in the wake of WFP’s April warning that a “silent tsunami” of rising food costs would add dramatically to the world population living in hunger. Nor does it include another $770 million in food aid that President Bush has asked Congress to provide as soon as possible.
On the other hand, Saudi Arabia, with oil revenues last year of $164 billion, does not even appear on the website donor list for 2008...
...The OPEC total amounts to roughly one minute and 10 seconds worth of the organization’s estimated $674 billion in annual oil revenues in 2007 -- revenues that will be vastly exceeded in 2008 with the continuing spiral in world oil prices.
The only other major oil exporter who made the WFP list of 2008 donors was the United Arab Emirates, which kicked in $50,000. UAE oil revenues in 2007 were $63 billion...
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Man Cuts Throat to Save Own Life
Man Saves Own Life, Uses Steak Knife for At-Home Tracheotomy
Wilder says he didn't call 911 because he didn't think help would arrive in time. So, the 55-year-old says, he got a steak knife from the kitchen and made a small hole in his throat, allowing air to gush in.
Wilder suffered from throat cancer and related breathing problems several years ago. About that time, he had an episode where he couldn't breathe because his air passages swelled shut. He says that's what happened this time around.
Doctors don't expect Wilder to suffer any adverse effects from the tracheotomy once it's healed.
You think Guthy-Renker sells a kit for that?
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Who will save Imad Sa'ad?
Who, indeed. Jeff Jacoby writes on the impending death of a Palestinian Arab dissident: Who will save Imad Sa'ad?
Nudel, 77, is a famous former refusenik who battled the Soviet Union for 16 years - four of them from exile in Siberia - for the right to immigrate to Israel, which Moscow finally granted in 1987. Sa'ad, 25, is a Palestinian policeman who was sentenced to death by a Palestinian Authority court in Hebron last week. His crime: alerting Israeli authorities to the whereabouts of four Palestinian terrorists, who were subsequently killed by Israeli forces.
In assisting Israeli counterterrorism, Sa'ad may have saved scores of innocent lives. For doing so, he was charged with "collaboration," and will face a firing squad unless international pressure forces Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, to commute his sentence. Or unless Israel, as Nudel urges in a letter to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, "launch[es] a rescue operation to extract the prisoner from his cell."
Hundreds of Palestinian dissidents have been murdered through the years as "collaborators." During the intifadah of the late 1980s, so many Palestinians were butchered by fellow Palestinians that the internecine violence came to be called the "intrafadah."...
Typical of totalitarian regimes everywhere. We know what the national will is, and we'll kill as many of our fellow nationals as necessary to make sure it stays that way. Sounds like this Imad Sa'ad was the only Palestinian willing to honor an agreement. Now they're ready to kill him for it.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Lebanon: The Coup that just occurred
From the Lebanese Political Journal
Hezbollah's militant takeover of Beirut and its systematic destruction of the authority of the state and freedom of the press suggests a sophisticated and planned campaign to take power. There is no hiding the violence Hezbollah used to seize Beirut and cut it off from the rest of the country. But as their media campaign is already showing, Hezbollah is employing subtle and sophisticated mechanisms to take over the rest of Lebanon. All news which could be construed as negative behaviors, such as the blatant destruction and corruption of Lebanese institutions, is hidden beneath a Hezbollah-dominated media blackout....
Targeting the Lebanese Christians
Hezbollah seems to be making a concerted effort to placate the Christian population. Ashrafieh was not attacked, and life is relatively normal in the Christian suburbs north of Beirut.
Al Jazeera is claiming that Hezbollah has made a "concession" by opening the airport road. As was told to me by a veteran Lebanese reporter, all of the journalists and news agencies reporting right now have been vetted by Hezbollah. Even if the news is true, it is written to present Hezbollah's actions as gracious.
Michel Aoun just gave an interview claiming that the crisis will be over soon. He even noted that the illegal occupation of Beirut's downtown by opposition militants will end soon. Many who watched his interview are happy to hear this news, despite it coming from a politician who appears to be Hezbollah's Christian spokesman. Once again, this sounds like propaganda that no other Lebanese faction is in a position to challenge...
..Depressing Conclusion
At the moment, it feels a bit like fall 2004 when the Syrians bullied all Lebanese factions into voting for a three year extension of Emile Lahoud's term in office. Rafiq al-Hariri resigned from office, and Lebanese parliamentarians and democratic activists kept their mouths shut while Syria appointed a government made up of its Lebanese cronies. When Lebanese politicians began to stir a bit, Druze parliamentarian Marwan Hamade was targetted for assassination, and barely survived.
According to NOW Lebanon online newspaper, pro-government websites are being attacked. So, we'll see what happens to this blog. The government's telecommunications company has probably been fully overrun by Hezbollah, and all of our calls and internet traffic could be monitored. A source in the pro-Hezbollah Syrian Social Nationalist Party claims that everything is being monitored right now. Good luck getting reliable news from Lebanon.
(Hopefully) more at NOW Lebanon
Analysis of the situation at Michael Totten's
..and Kouchner says France will not passively watch Lebanon go to war
Isn't that what we just did?
UPDATE: Jeha at Pajamas Media writes:
Third, in simple economic terms, Hezbo* is taking over an economy they are ill-equipped to control. When the parasite takes over the host, it kills the host and dies with it. While the thugs were taking over their positions, people were changing their Lebanese liras back to dollars.
Finally, in simple national terms, the defeat of the government would represent a defeat of the UN. With no chance of being implemented, UN resolution 1559 will wither away and Hezbo will keep their cherished weapons. But Resolution 1559 is now part of 1701, which also links the resolution to the armistice agreement with Israel and, more importantly, to Lebanon’s border demarcation. So Nasrallah will get to keep his weapons, and the Israelis will get to “redefine” the border.
As a result, we Lebanese may end up with a resistance without a people, an economy, or a land.
What are we fighting about, then?
* Jeha lives in Beirut and blogs at Jeha’s Nail. He refers to Hezbollah as “Hezbo” because he doesn’t believe in a “Party of God.”
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Canadian PM Harper Gives Unequivocal Support to Israel
Radio interview here. Remarkable. This guy deserves our support in a big way. Via an effusive Israpundit.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
BBC FInds a Benefit of Global Warming
No Joke: BBC: Great tits cope well with warming
...The research uses a long record of great tits in a breeding site at Wytham Woods near Oxford, where observations began in 1947...
Surprising, as I always understood tits to be rather sensitive to changes in temperature. Perhaps further observation is in order...
[h/t: MIss Kelly and the Environmental Republican]
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
ADL: Anti-Semitism in Arab Media (Cartoon)
I keep forgetting to cancel my Al-Watan subscription.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Mock 'Checkpoint' on the UC Berkley Campus
Photo essay of doofuses on parade at Zombietime. What? No mock suicide bombers?
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It
Saudi Anthropologist Advocates Modern Interpretation of Religious Texts and Suggests Removing Swords from Saudi Flag (Video)
Yes, there are people like this.
The following are excerpts from an interview with Saudi anthropologist Sa'd Al-Sowayan, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on April 25, 2008
...Sa'd Al-Sowayan: "The text is static, but the way people interpret it is not. You can interpret the text in a way that corresponds with the age in which you live."
Interviewer: "So you have no problem with people interpreting the text differently in each age?"
Sa'd Al-Sowayan: "As long as it is compatible with the spirit of the text."
Interviewer: "In other words, the spirit of the text remains, and in each age, there is an adaptation [of the text]."
Sa'd Al-Sowayan: "For example, I do not think - and I might be going off on a tangent here - that it is in the best interest of the Islamic religion that we insist on continuing to live as if we were in the historical age of the Prophet Muhammad and his companions. Everything has changed, and I believe that we must inevitably understand this change and respond to it. Otherwise, the physical existence of Muslims as Muslims will ultimately be jeopardized. Isn't it important for Muslims to continue to exist as a strong nation, which influences the world in which we live? How can this happen if we relate to things as if we were living 1,400 years ago?"[...]
There's more in the video and transcript at the link.
DIGG This | del.icio.us | Facebook | Stumble It