Amazon.com Widgets

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Peace partners: Mother of 4 terrorists serving 18 life sentences for murder honored by Palestinian Authority

"The Palestinian mother is a central partner in the struggle...
It is she who gave birth to the fighters, and she deserves
that we bow to her in salute and in honor."

Those were the words of the Palestinian Authority's Minister for Prisoners' Affairs, Issa Karake, when he honored a Palestinian woman by awarding her "the Shield of Resoluteness and Giving."

Mother_of_4.jpg

She received this honor because she is the mother of four sons who are serving a total of 18 life sentences in Israeli prisons. They all killed Israeli civilians in terror attacks.

The Minister also "praised the Abu Hamid family as a model of willpower and of the struggle for the independence of Palestine" when he visited the family with a ministry delegation, human rights organizations and released prisoners, the official PA daily newspaper reported.

The four sons are serving life sentences for the following crimes:

Nasser Abu Hamid - 7 life sentences + 50 years - commander in Fatah's military wing the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades in Ramallah. Convicted of killing seven Israeli civilians and 12 attempted murders.

Nasr Abu Hamid - 5 life sentences - Member of terror faction of Fatah, Tanzim, and convicted of involvement in two terror attacks and arms dealing.

Sharif Abu Hamid- 4 life sentences - a member in one of the brothers' units carrying out terror attacks against civilians and soldiers. Accompanied a suicide bomber to his attack in March 2002.

Muhammad Abu Hamid - 2 life sentences + 30 years - involvement in terror attacks.

Minister Karake also chose this week to visit the home of the suicide terrorist Ayyat Al-Akhras who in 2002 entered a Jerusalem supermarket and detonated a bomb murdering two Israelis and killing herself. The minister's visit took place on the occasion of the Palestinian "National Day for Returning the Bodies of Palestinian and Arab Shahids and MIA's."...

More here. Try not to laugh at all the "Peace Process" talk we're all going to have to sit through.

Danny Ayalon: I am a refugee - 'As a descendant of a family forced out of Algeria, my father and I - and the millions of other Jews from families who were expelled from Arab countries after 1948 - are entitled to redress...' | # | (0) | Share

Here's an excellent, must-read piece by Claire Berlinski concerning the scene in Turkey. This is one of the clearest and most concise explanations I've read: Istanbul: Press Freedom Alla Turca

In May, a ship full of civilians -- but not full of humanitarian aid -- sailed from Turkey to join the Free Gaza flotilla. Having warned the Mavi Marmara that it would not be allowed to breach the blockade, Israeli commandos raided the ship. In the clash, nine Turks were killed. I've lived in Istanbul for five years and I've spoken to hundreds of Turks about these events. A Turkish documentary filmmaker and I have filmed some of these conversations. Something will immediately strike the viewer: the Turkish people have no idea what happened. This is because the most basic facts about and surrounding these events have not been reported in Turkey.

In billing the flotilla as a humanitarian mission, the IHH -- the expedition's Islamist sponsor -- exploited the Turks' Achilles heel: their generosity. Turks think of themselves as charitable and compassionate, as indeed they are. They genuinely believe, because this is what has been reported here, that the Palestinians are starving. They know almost nothing about the reasons for the blockade. They believe that the ship was on a humanitarian mission and nothing but a humanitarian mission. They are bewildered that anyone would have interfered with such a noble-minded endeavour. They do not know that there were no humanitarian supplies on the Mavi Marmara. They do not know the most rudimentary facts about Hamas. As one man said: "These are elected people. It's not like they took over by force, via a coup."

Almost no one in Turkey understands any language but Turkish. If this obviously thoughtful man was unaware that indeed, Hamas took over precisely by force, via a coup, it is because he had no way to know. The men and women to whom we spoke were astonished when we told them that Israeli officials had invited the ship to disembark at Ashdod and deliver the aid overland. But they were not disbelieving -- and importantly, when we told them this, it changed their view. Many spontaneously said that they knew they could not trust what they heard in the news, that the situation confused them and that something about the story just didn't sound right...

That's just the taste to get you started. Here's the rest. Turkish democracy is on the ropes. Find out how and why.

2 injured in West Bank terror attack near Rimonim Junction

Shots were reportedly fired at a vehicle traveling in the area between the settlement Kochav Yaakov and Rimonim Junction in the West Bank on Wednesday night.

Judea and Samaria Police officers who arrived on the scene found an Israeli vehicle with bullet marks. "The vehicle descended down a nearby slope," police said. The officers who arrived in the area found one person seriously injured and another person slightly injured.

Magen David Adom rushed the two Israelis to the Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center in Jerusalem; a man aged around 30 in moderate to serious condition suffering from a gunshot wound to the knee, and a woman aged around 30 who was injured in the resulting accident. Both are conscious and stable, paramedics said...

Carl has been live blogging.

No surprise. Even the PA is pursuing the Arafat strategy by attending talks and denouncing them at home. Per this report from MEMRI: Fatah Official: We'll Support Escalation In Popular Resistance During Negotiations

A Fatah official told the London daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi that movement officials, including Nabil Sha'th and Mahmoud Al-'Alul, recently discussed, with the Popular Resistance Committees and with international activists, escalating the popular resistance during the negotiations, with public activities against the fence and against the settlements, and with mass protest marches.

Al-'Alul said that Fatah's support for the popular resistance is part of its strategy, and does not depend on the negotiations portfolio.

Jeff Jacoby: 'Clunkers' was a classic government folly - 'IN THE MARKET for a used car? Good luck finding a bargain: The price of "pre-owned" vehicles has climbed considerably over the past year. According to Edmunds.com, a website for car-buyers, a 3-year-old automobile today will set you back, on average, close to $20,000 -- a spike of more than 10 percent since last summer. For some popular models, the increase has been much steeper. In July, a used Cadillac Escalade was going for around $35,000, or nearly 36 percent over last July's price...' | # | (0) | Share
Obama and Nixon would agree on this - '...the Obama Administration -- like the Nixon Administration -- seems prepared to use the IRS as an instrument to punish dissenters like Z Street. The same Administration that passionately defends the absolute right of a Muslim group of questionable ideology and funding to build a mosque in a highly sensitive location in the US -- some might call it 'unhelpful' -- has done its best to prevent Jews from building even an extra bedroom in East Jerusalem or Judea/Samaria. Now it is using its massive power to silence American Zionists who disagree with it.' | # | (0) | Share

TwoStateSolution.jpg
J Street's mien in demanding "answers" from The Emergency Committee on Israel, smacks of The Grand Inquisitor rather than from a concerned party in the current debate on the eternally elusive Peace Process. Lurking behind every question by Ben Ami and his minions is the veiled threat of summoning their master, Barak Obama. How dare anyone diverge from the party line and the One? The Two State solution has become holy writ and anyone who questions its implementation (whatever that means), must be a "far right" fanatic. Of course, "far right" is never applied to Hamas or Abbas' Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade; it is specially reserved for "settlers" and Likud. There is nothing "far right" about a group like Hamas that emulates pure fascism and theocratic blood lust. At worst, some of them are "extremists." To so-called American Jewish "Progressive" thinking, "extremist" pales in calumny to "right wing." Ben Ami knows precisely which buttons to push among his naive followers.

That is the reason for his lawyerly response to the murder yesterday of four Jews from Beit Haggai near Kiryat Arba.

Aside from being "saddened" by the murders, he offers this assessment:

"It is unfortunately not a surprise that extremists would try to undermine the launch of direct talks. We urge all sides to prevent the situation from spiraling out of control and harming the prospects for peace."

Sounds more like a State Department response than one from a Jew who touts himself as "Pro Israel." Note that he is not outraged or even indignant. Not a surprise, given his group's demonization of anyone living beyond the Green Line. The October, 2009 J Street conference featured speaker after speaker exhibiting their hatred of settlers, chief among whom was Haaretz's Gideon Levy, who compared them to a "cancer." How does one mourn or express anger at the elimination of a "cancer?" Ben Ami's sadness is limited to the prospect that the cherished fantasy of a "two state solution" might be in jeopardy.

7 per cent solution.jpg

The Holy Grail of the "Two State Solution" is, of course, viewed by most of the Arab world as the "23rd" State Solution (or the 24th State Solution if you take into account Hamasistan) and the beginning of the end for the Jewish State. Ben Ami knows, or should know this fact. In its interrogatories (again, the lawyer, Ben Ami) to ECI, J Street may have gotten more than it bargained for. Michael Goldfarb's trenchant response contained a number of crucial counter-questions. J Street has yet to respond. But then, when you've got the President's back, you don't really need to answer any questions.

At the end of the day, the "Two State Solution" is really the "Seven Per Cent Solution", to borrow Nicolas Meyer's title of his intriguing novel about Sherlock Holmes. The plot chronicled Holmes' recovery from his addiction to cocaine. Isn't it about time that Ben Ami & Co. check into rehab and rid themselves of their dangerous addiction to "The Two State Solution?"

[Crossposted from JStreetJive.]

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

I constantly receive mail and contacts of various kinds from Arabs, Iranians, Pakistanis, and Turks--among others--about how much they like my writing. In fact, many of my ideas and inspiration comes from conversations with these people. You'd be surprised to hear some of the names, countries, and positions of those involved in these dialogues.

It's a complex issue but to put it simply: those in the West may romanticize or refuse to criticize radical Islamists and Middle East dictatorships but that doesn't exactly thrill those who live under these regimes or who fear seeing their countries being taken over by extremists who repress and maybe will kill them.

I wrote an entire book about this situation and these people, The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East, John Wiley Publishers (2005). That book, and other things I've written, explains both my tremendous sympathy for these liberals and reformers as well as why I didn't advocate a policy based on the belief that the United States could democratize the region or solve the problems of these societies by overthrowing the ruling regimes.

During my last speaking trip, which usually focused on the battle between Islamists and nationalists, there were Arabs or Iranians present at each event who enthusiastically endorsed what I said. In one case, a Palestinian wearing a very large kafiyah sat in the front row nodding at my main points. Afterward, he explained that he was a Palestinian Authority supporter who hated Hamas and thought that group was ruining his people's chance for ever getting their own independent state.

Continue reading "Muslims Who Don't Want to Live Under Islamist Dictatorships Urge: Help Us By Telling The Truth"

Alan Dershowitz: How Goldstone Is Making Peace More Difficult - 'When President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas try to make peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the 600 pound gorilla in the room will be Richard Goldstone. Although he was not invited to the meetings, his presence will be felt. It will send the following message to the Israeli government: If you end your military occupation of the West Bank, and the Palestinians use their new territory to launch rockets and other attacks against Israel, you will not be able to defend yourself, without Goldstone and the colleagues condemning you for taking actions in self defense...' | # | (0) | Share
Alan Dershowitz: Three Myths About The Peace Process - 'In the days leading up to the initial meeting between President Obama, Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas, the op ed pages and blogs have been filled with opinion pieces about the dynamics of the upcoming peace process. Most of these analyses have simply provided an opportunity for advocates to argue that their preexisting positions are valid. Many of these positions are mythical and bare little relationship to the realties on the ground. Let me identify three pervasive myths...' | # | (0) | Share
Shots, "Explosive Device" Clears Discovery Channel HQ Near DC - 'Radical Environmentalist Demanding Discovery Channel Stop Promoting Births of "Human Parasites" (aka "Human Beings") Beyond Parody: CBS: A "PASSIONATE CAUSE"...' | # | (0) | Share

In the Boston Globe, here's Dan Wasserman's take, a day after Hamas brutally murdered four people and hundreds of Palestinian Arabs came out to dance in the streets:

09.01-thumb-609x475-19461.jpg

Yes, that's right, once again the story line is that Bibi is the obstacle to peace, and that the potential end of a construction moratorium in places where Jews already live is the only problem that needs to be overcome. I mean, just have a look at this picture. Innocent Abbas. Abbas cannot control Hamas, cannot keep them from murdering Jews in Judea and Samaria, won't stop the incitement in his own media, refuses to compromise on any issue, had to crack down on his own people and defy other Arab leaders just to sit in the same room with the Israelis under pressure from the US...but it's Bibi that's the problem. Forget the mindlessness of the thing, a day after a roadside murder that ought to have a clarifying effect on the matter, Tinkertoys on the table is what's in your brain to draw cartoons about? This isn't just rotten analysis, it's an obsession.

We could be charitable to Wasserman and assume he submitted this one before yesterday's events became known, but then that should have engendered a desperate call to the editors to hold the presses. It might have allowed him to appear simply a block head rather than something worse.

No excuse, however, for Isabel Kershner and Mark Landler of The New York Times. Here's a beauty: Killing of Israeli Settlers Rattles Leaders. We can expend the bulk of our outrage (though by no means all) in the first paragraph:

The killing of four Israeli settlers, including a pregnant woman, in the West Bank on Tuesday evening rattled Israeli and Palestinian leaders on the eve of peace talks in Washington and underscored the disruptive role that the issue of Jewish settlements could play in the already fragile negotiations...

Again with the settlements! Seriously? This brutal, planned murder underscores the role of Jewish settlements? Are you serious? It doesn't underscore the militant death culture, refusal to seriously negotiate, and basic lawlessness that permeates Palestinian society? I hope Obamacare includes free Prozac for "news" people, since I detect a serious untreated OCD epidemic that's crying out for relief.

A bit later:

...The Palestinian Authority also condemned the attacks, which occurred just before its president, Mahmoud Abbas, met with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. A Palestinian spokesman, Nabil Abu Rudeineh, said the attack by Hamas, the authority's rival, underlined "the need to proceed quickly toward a just and lasting peace agreement," which he said would "put an end to these acts."...

As though the PA can negotiate peace on behalf of Hamas!

More:

...Salam Fayyad, the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority, said in a statement, "We condemn this operation, which contradicts Palestinian interests and the efforts of the Palestinian leadership to garner international support for the national rights of our people."...

Tactics, but no morality. A negotiating stance, but no real condemnation. This is the best the much loved (in the West, and in the West only) and much vaunted Salam Fayyad can produce.

These press fools need to stop doing politics on behalf of the Administration and start reporting the news that's right in front of their faces.

More on this from Soccerdad: The "cbm" imbalance, Elder of Ziyon: Fayyad's fake condemnation, and Phyllis Chesler, who notes in a piece entitled Seeing Red: Jewish Blood on the West Bank, Its Portrayal in the Western Media:

Four young civilians: human beings, fathers, mothers, one of whom was also pregnant, collectively the parents of seven children, were brutally gunned down by armed, masked terrorists. Their murders were openly celebrated in the streets by their attackers and by thousands of their supporters.

You would think that the world would recoil in horror--or that those who report the news, world-wide, would do so. Think again. These four precious souls were Israeli "settlers" and, as such, have already been so demonized that they are now seen as having provoked their bloody, pitiless deaths.

First, they came for the settlers. Then, they came for the secular Israeli pro-peace demonstrators in Jerusalem, Haifa and Tel Aviv. And then they came for....you and me...

Indeed. I have often said that the demonization of Israelis throughout the Arab and Muslim Worlds has gone to such a height that they are geared up to do something awful and on a mass scale, while the demonization within the European media has gone to such lengths that they are gearing themselves up to accept it. I'm sorry to say that it's clear that The New York Times and The Boston Globe have joined that chorus.

Update: More along these lines, and about the murders:

CiF Watch: Rabbis for whose human rights?

Eight words. That's all the compassion, for the 4 murdered Israelis and their families, that Israeli NGO, Rabbis for Human Rights (RHR), felt they could muster, in a 92 word press release, before pivoting to their major concern - the possibility that Israelis may take reprisals. RHR also warns darkly of the possibility that such sinister settlers may even uproot Palestinian trees (Oh, the horror!)...

Fresno Zionism: What Hillary Clinton does not understand

And Seraphic Secret with a must-read: The Murder Process. From whom, these important images:

talia yitzchak imus.jpg

gaza celebrating.jpg

More from Barry Rubin: Terror Attack Near Hebron: Not An Incident But a Revelation About What's Happening

And Daniel Greenfield gets right to the point: There Will Be No Peace

...Terrorism does not exist because there is no peace process. Terrorism exists because there IS a peace process, or a possibility of one. Hamas murdered five Jews because it wanted to make a point to all the parties that it could not be ignored. At other times it is Fatah that has done the same thing. Israel's willingness to negotiate stimulates terrorism like nothing else, because it creates a tangible reward. Without the peace process, terrorism would fade away on its own. As it had become a fading problem, before Clinton and Rabin plucked Arafat out of obscurity and gave him a country to play with. Paradoxically as long as the peace process holds out the possibility of victory for the terrorists, there can be and will be no peace.

Lee Smith: The Arab Lobby - A new book explores the 'petrodiplomatic complex' and Saudi influence on U.S. foreign policy - '...there is an Arab lobby in the United States--one as old as, if not older than, the Israel lobby, and it has helped to shape U.S. foreign policy and economic life since the end of World War II. Mitchell Bard's The Arab Lobby: The Invisible Alliance That Undermines America's Interests in the Middle East describes how this Arab lobby--from U.S. foreign service officers, oil companies, Christian anti-Zionists, and Ivy League universities to Gulf Arab states, Arab-American activists and Islamist ideologues--exercises its influence in U.S. politics. The book is already being dismissed by critics as a slapdash attempt by a former AIPAC employee to answer Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer's 2007 book, The Israel Lobby. But those who actually read the new book will find a serious and timely look at a powerful and remarkably under-studied influence on U.S. foreign policy...' | # | (0) | Share

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

dodcoolboat.jpg

High speed vessel Swift (HSV-2), rear, sails off the coast of Guyana, Aug. 29, 2010, en route to the city of Georgetown, where her crew will participate in subject matter exchanges with the Guyanese Defense Force in support of Southern Partnership Station (SPS) 2010. Swift is the first U.S. military vessel to dock pier-side in the country. SPS is an annual deployment of various specialty platforms to the U.S. Southern Command area of responsibility in the Caribbean and Central America. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Kim Williams/Released)

This is being portrayed as a "drive by." It was clearly far worse than that.

4 Israelis killed in shooting attack

Murderous terror attack on eve of peace talks: Four Israelis killed in West Bank shooting attack Tuesday evening; pregnant woman apparently among victims, officials say. Security forces nationwide ordered to go on high alert

Lethal terror attack on eve of peace talks : Four Israelis were murdered Tuesday evening after the vehicle they were traveling in was ambushed by terrorists in the Hebron region.

At least some of the victims, who are all residents of Beit Hagai, are members of the same family. Ambulance service officials said the victims include two men aged about 25 and 40, as well as two women of roughly the same ages, one of them pregnant.

According to initial reports, an Israeli vehicle traveling in the area came under fire directed at it from a passing vehicle at the Bani Naim junction on Highway 60, between Hebron and Kiryat Arba.

More than one terrorist apparently took part in the attack, with Channel Two reporting the attackers apparently confirmed the death of the Israeli victims by shooting them at close range, before fleeing the scene.

"The vehicle was sprayed with dozens of bullets," a paramedic at the scene told Channel 2. "There were numerous shell casings around. We found four bodies and there was no chance whatsoever to help them; all we could do was to pronounce the death of these four Jews."

Paramedic Guy Gonen told Ynet: "The victims were hit by numerous shots from short range. It looked like a well-planned ambush."...

This is the face of "resistance," whatever that means:

...Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum told Ynet the attack was not meant to foil direct peace talks, and said the negotiations had failed even before starting.

"This is a natural response by the Palestinian resistance to the enemy's crimes, and is proof that despite the resistance's persecution by the security services and despite Israel's crimes, the Palestinians are capable of responding to these crimes."

"This is proof that the Palestinian resistance is living, breathing, and kicking," he said...

...Meanwhile, the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) told Ynet Tuesday's shooting attack was a message to the Palestinian negotiating team ahead of the resumption of direct talks with Israel.

"They should not have embarked on this move without the support of the Palestinian people," PRC Spokesman Abu Mujahid said. "Our people still espouse the resistance and do not believe in the fictitious talks scheduled to commence tomorrow. "

"This is proof that the Palestinians and Palestinian groups reject the negotiations doctrine and only espouse resistance, which continues anywhere, anytime," he said.

Carl has a comprehensive live blog, noting that Hamas has taken responsibility, and this:

...Note that Moriah writes in the comments that one of the couples who was murdered had seven children. Hashem yerachem (may God have mercy upon them)...

Honest Reporting takes note of the Associated Press's idiot choice of illustrations: AP Illustrates a Deadly Roadside Terror Attack

Elder has a roundup of links here.

The Israel Project has a report here: Terrorist Attack Kills Four Israelis but Will Not Derail Peace Talks

JPost reports: 4 Israelis shot dead by terrorists in West Bank

...Hamas military wing spokesman Abu Obeida told The Associated Press late Tuesday that Hamas carried out the attack...

...The four were two couples - one aged 25 and the other 40. One of the women was pregnant. According to eyewitness reports, the terrorists succeeded in hitting the passengers in their initial fire but then approached the car and shot them occupants at close range.

"When we arrived on the scene, all four doors of the car were open and four bodies were strewn on the road," Magen David Adom paramedic Guy Ronen told The Jerusalem Post. "We saw that the vital organs had been struck by a very large number of bullets, and that there was no chance of saving their lives," he added.

"It was a very difficult scene. We had learned to forget scenes like this in recent years," Ronen said.

A ZAKA volunteer who arrived on the scene recognized his wife's body. "We saw him crying at the scene and didn't understand what was happening at first. It wasn't the first disaster he saw," his colleague, Isaac Berenstein, told the Post. Then he shouted, "that's my wife!' That's my wife!'" The volunteer was immediately removed from the scene by his colleagues and taken to his home in Bet Hagai...

ZAKA are the courageous religious Jews who are the first responders to terror attacks and deadly accidents in Israel. They clean up the mess and face things it takes a strong religious core to deal with. Heart-wrenching.

Yaacov Lozowick takes note of the absolutely disgusting Twitter emanation from New York Times op-ed writer and darling of the anti-Israel lobby, Ali Abunimah:

Civilian deaths are always tragic. Israel must stop using civilian settlers as human shields for the land it is stealing

Lozowick calls it "nauseating." I'll let it sit at that for fear of writing something far worse.
More on Abunimah's public spewing at CiF Watch.

More: From AFP: Four Israelis killed in West Bank shooting, Hamas rejoices

...The Islamist Hamas organisation praised the attack and hundreds of its supporters took to the streets of the Gaza Strip to celebrate...

Update: Do not forget, this incident is directly predictable as a product of the stated goals of Hamas and the other "resistance" movements, all of which share the ideology as stated in the Hamas Charter, their Constitution:

[Peace] initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement. For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion; the nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its faith, the movement educates its members to adhere to its principles and to raise the banner of Allah over their homeland as they fight their Jihad: "Allah is the all-powerful, but most people are not aware." From time to time a clamoring is voiced, to hold an International Conference in search for a solution to the problem...the Islamic Resistance Movement...does not believe that those conferences are capable of responding to demands, or of restoring rights or doing justice to the oppressed. Those conferences are no more than a means to appoint the nonbelievers as arbitrators in the lands of Islam...There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad. The initiatives, proposals and International Conferences are but a waste of time, an exercise in futility.

Get it?

Map: The shooting took place near Bnei Naim on Route 60.

Update, via Carl, video of the aftermath:

I still remember quite well seeing the above the fold, front page photo in the Boston Globe. At the time I didn't know what a distortion of reality it was. I'd hazard that most Globe readers never learned what a distortion it was but were simply left with that horrible first impression:

tuvia.jpg

Now, ten years on, Honest Reporting has united Tuvia Grossman with the policeman who actually saved his life: EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Dramatic Reunion Ten Years After The Photo That Started It All

On September 30, 2000, The New York Times, Associated Press and other major media outlets published a photo of a young man -- bloodied and battered -- crouching beneath a club-wielding Israeli policeman. The caption identified him as a Palestinian victim of Israeli brutality -- with the clear implication that the Israeli soldier was the one who beat him.

That young man was, in fact, Tuvia Grossman, a Jewish student from Chicago, who was beaten within inches of his life before being rescued by the Israeli border policeman in the photo.

The resulting outrage generated by the gross distortion of the photo "launched" HonestReporting...

...Now, ten years later, we caught up with Tuvia in an exclusive interview...

More here. And here's the video:

dita-von-teese.jpg

I don't believe she herself is Jewish. And can you really sue someone for "anti-Semitism"? Apparently it's for a "civil rights violation."

Saucy star Dita Von Teese on Monday began suing her former landlord, claiming he subjected her to a "Mel Gibson-like anti-Semitic" attack, entertainment news website TMZ reported.

The burlesque artist, who is American-born of Armenian heritage, accused Lallubhai Patel of launching vicious tirades after she said she was moving out and tried to get back her $5,000 deposit.

In a lawsuit in the LA County Superior Court and cited by Courthouse News Service, Von Teese said Patel "repeatedly went on Mel Gibson-like Anti-Semitic tangents, personally attacking [Von Teese's] Jewish managers and business partners" who approached him for the money.

The suit is referring to embattled Hollywood star Gibson's alleged anti-Semitism -- which infamously came to light when he busted by police for drunk driving in 2006. He later apologized.

She also alleges Patel wrote to her, warning her to be "aware of Jews. In your business no one can do anything without them. Just a reminder to be cautious" and "Jews they have shucks [sic] the whole world and still more to come."

Von Teese, who splits her time between Paris and Hollywood, moved out over a dispute about accounting of repairs to the property.

She is seeking unspecified damages for civil rights violations.

ditasnowwhite.jpg

Yeah, I posted this in part just to put up the pictures.

From Seraphic Secret:

harz1-400x300.jpg

Jewish graves on the Mount of Olives deliberately destroyed by Arab Muslims.

You know how the Ground Zero Mosque Islamists claims that the purpose of the massive structure is to promote tolerance and interfaith dialogue.

Well, that was the initial fiction. But that's been dropped because the aggression and rigidity are, well, obviously so not tolerant, so hostile and Islamist, that now, Mr. Feisal Abdul Rauf--"I don't believe in religious dialogue"--and his supporters tediously repeat the lie that this is about, ahem, religious freedom.

Well, religious freedom is not a problem in America.

The real problem is, gee, what a shock, in the Muslim world.

The Mount of Olives, an ancient--from biblical times Jews have buried their dead here--and a holy cemetery in Jerusalem, is being used by Muslims as a garbage dump.

Jewish graves have been desecrated and destroyed. Muslims regularly lead their donkeys across the gravestones.

Muslim children play soccer among the dead.

Of course, this is nothing new:

Jewish burials were halted in 1948, and massive vandalism took place from 1948-1967. During the nineteen years of Jordanian rule, 40,000 of the 50,000 graves were desecrated. King Hussein permitted the construction of the Intercontinental Hotel at the summit of the Mount of Olives together with a road that cut through the cemetery which destroyed hundreds of Jewish graves, some from the First Temple Period. After the Six-Day War, restoration work began, and the cemetery was re-opened for burials.

It continues even now. More here.

Indoctrination U: Brooklyn College Requires Students Read Anti-American Book - '...Brooklyn College is showing its worst face once again. As The New York Jewish Week reports, incoming transfer students have been assigned a book to read that is meant to give them a common framework for discussion. As the newspaper informed its readers, " 'How Does It Feel to Be a Problem? Being Young and Arab in America,' by Moustafa Bayoumi , has been assigned to about 1500 incoming transfer students 'in an effort to provide a common experience for this population of students,' according to a letter from the school administration to Brooklyn College faculty members."...' [Also: New York Daily News Reports On Brooklyn College Indoctrination] | # | (0) | Share

Another must-read from Israeli-Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh: Direct Talks to Nowhere

For decades, Arab and Islamic leaders and governments have been inciting their people against Israel. That is the main reason why these governments and leaders would never be able to persuade their people to make peace with Israel.

In this regard, the Palestinian Authority has not been different from the Arab and Islamic dictatorships.

For the past 15 years, the Palestinian Authority has been involved in the dissemination of anti-Israel messages through the rhetoric of its leaders and spokesman, media and mosques.

Yasser Arafat unleashed a wave of incitement against Israel in the Palestinian-controlled media. His message to the Palestinians, immediately after the beginning of the peace process began in 1993, was that Israel was not serious about peace and only wanted to continue "stealing Arab land."

Arafat also kept promising that if the Palestinians don't get 100% of their demands, they would not hesitate to resort to an armed struggle. He pledged "millions of martyrs" who would march on Jerusalem to liberate the city.

Moreover, Arafat told the Palestinians that no Arab or Muslim leader had the right to make real concessions to Israel, especially not on issues related to Jerusalem and the "right of return" for Palestinian refugees.

Perhaps that explains why Arafat was unable to sign any deal at the Camp David summit in 2000. After all, he himself had been telling the Palestinians that anyone who makes concessions to Israel is a "traitor." Through his media and rhetoric, Arafat delegitimized and demonized Israel to a point where he was unable later on to make a deal with the Israeli government...

The rest.

By our friend Jim Wald, an interesting little article that traces the use of some anti-Black and anti-Jewish imagery to make a point in classroom communication. Tough to encapsulate, but take a look (and have fun with the first comment...some people are just obsessed): Teaching Difficult Subjects

Robert Fulford: The Long History of anti-Semitism in Muslim Lands - '...In the 20th century, Arab hostility to Jews took an ugly turn. Some claim that the new state of Israel "caused" the trouble. But well before Israel's creation in 1948, Arabs were identifying Jews as enemies. In 1910, in the now-Iranian city of Shiraz, mobs robbed and destroyed 5,000 Jewish homes, with the encouragement of soldiers. In 1922, in Yemen, an old decree permitting the forcible conversion of Jewish orphans to Islam was reintroduced. The government searched towns and villages for children without fathers, so that they could be given Muslim instruction. The children were chained and imprisoned till they agreed to convert. In 1936 in Iraq, under Nazi influence, Jews were limited by quota in the public schools, Hebrew teaching was banned in Jewish schools and Jewish newspapers were shut down...' | # | (0) | Share

Monday, August 30, 2010

Apparently, this is not the first time. This from the Marty Lamb campaign:

LAMB CONCERNED ABOUT ANOTHER OCCURRENCE OF VANDALISM

Holliston, MA ...Today, Marty Lamb, Republican candidate for Congress in Massachusetts Third District, has filed another police report about vandalism that took place at his home late Saturday night at his home in Holliston.

This time vandals threw broken glass, old books, suit cases, and broken lamps on to the candidate's family lawn along with stealing their campaign signs.

"I am concerned about the escalation of vandalism at my home where I live with my wife and two daughters. It is one thing to have a political disagreement, but going to a candidate's home is just plain wrong," said Lamb.

During a campaign candidates often see lots of theft of signs. It is unusual to have people throwing glass and dumping garbage on a candidate's lawn...

Marty is running for the Republican nomination in the Massachusetts 3rd, currently held by Jim McGovern (D). Previous posts about Marty here, here, here and here. The other Republican hopeful is Mike Stopa.

[The following, by Daniel Greenfield, is crossposted from Sultan Knish.]

The Ground Zero Mosque debate is only the latest in a long series of incidents in which liberals have chosen to side with Islamists, while denying their victims a fair hearing or any hearing at all. Opponents of the mosque are painted as "Islamophobic Extremists" representing nothing but bigotry and hate. This is much the same way that the liberal cultural elite has placed the blame for over a thousand years of Muslim persecution of Jews on "Zionist Extremism". While a Koran in the toilet becomes a front page story, the ongoing persecution of Hindus, Zoroastrians and Christians in Muslim countries is only a footnote in the State Department's human rights report.

This ugly bias is the product of a political alliance between Liberals and Islamists. And the cost of that alliance may be the world as we know it. That alliance is the reason why the US and Europe attacked Yugoslavia on behalf of a Muslim separatist group in the name of a non-existent genocide, while refusing to take any action against the very real and very horrifying Sudanese Muslim genocide of Africans. It is why Israel is constantly barraged with hateful propaganda from the same left, which defended Saddam's sovereignty in Iraq. The very same media propagandists who champion the flotilla on behalf of Hamas rule in Gaza, have next to no interest in Saddam's rape rooms, his ethnic cleansing of the Marsh Arabs, or his use of chemical weapons against the Kurds. While the American media becomes wildly exercised over a Disney employee's right to wear a Hijab or some other trivial bit of Islamic lawfare-- hardly any newspaper outside of Der Spiegel has covered allegations that Turkey may be using chemical weapons against the Kurds.

muslim-vi.jpg

This is worse than mere bias. It amounts to ignoring mass murder and genocide because it is inconvenient. It means that the United States entered a war on behalf of a Muslim terrorist organization over a lie widely promoted by the media, which refused to call for armed intervention in the actual genocides taking place in Africa. The media has eagerly demonized entire ethnic and religious groups, because of Islamic hostility to those groups. The persecution and assaults on Jews in Europe today, can be added to the ugly tab of a media that has vigorously taken the Muslim side, and promoted their hatred of a minority group in Europe and the Middle East.

The excuses do not hold water. In the name of fighting racism, the media has been unapologetically racist. In the name of tolerance, it has been wickedly intolerant. In the name of preventing persecution, it has turned a blind eye to ethnic cleansing and genocide by Muslims-- while provoking and perpetuating Muslim separatist conflicts In Asia, Europe and the Middle East. And tricking the American public into a war on behalf of one such separatist group under false pretenses. These are crimes. More than that, these are the actions of bigots whose biases are rigid and fixed, and who like the Nazis, use a political ideology as the basis for valuing some lives below those of others, based on ethnic and religious criteria.

Continue reading "The Liberal-Islamist Alliance"

This is the problem with overreaching at home and appeasing abroad. You lose the credibility necessary for getting people to roll the dice with you. In this case, many Israelis have already seen what it's done to America over the past two years: Obama, we're not suckers

Op-ed: Obama may mortgage America's future, but we won't let him do the same to Israel

This past week, the cat was out of the bag and the American president's infinite arrogance came bursting forth. Unlike his European colleagues, whose statements made sure to minimize their involvement to "ending the occupation of 1967," President Obama (via a State Department spokesman) revealed his intention to bring an "end to the conflict."

Does Obama really know how to "end the conflict?" We got the answer two days later, when a document published in the media revealed the US Administration's intention to secure a final-status agreement within a year, while implementing it within 10 years. In other words, Obama wishes to win all the glory while mortgaging the future (our future, not his.)

After all, this is Obama's specialty. The president "saved" the US economy by printing more than $3 trillion, most of which were poured into the American economy via the acquisition of inflated mortgage-backed securities. He's leaving the bill for his successors.

Americans may be willing to clean after Obama and believe that he saved them from collapse (they will find the fractures and skeletons in a few years,) but the State of Israel cannot take such chances. We live in the present and not in promises for a rosy future; hence, the US president would do well to show a little modesty: Learn about the roots of the conflict, understand why there is no solution for it at this time, and most importantly, premise any proposal for an interim agreement on realities on the ground.

If Obama wishes to use the "implementation in 10 years" card to shove a "deal" premised on the types of dreams he's selling to his own people down our throats, we have news for him: We're not your highness' suckers. If you wish to propose something that would be implemented in 10 years, you're invited to come back for a visit nine years from now. Any attempt to look even just one year into the future is dangerous in our neighborhood...[More.]

North Korea and South Africa: A Study in Hypocrisy - '...I have said nothing here that acquits apartheid-era South Africa of dehumanizing injustice toward the majority of its citizens, or to diminish the righteousness of the world's outrage against that, or to criticize the commendable leadership of liberal opinion-makers in galvanizing that outrage. But the question left unanswered is this: Why not North Korea, too?' | # | (0) | Share
Nick Cohen: Radical Islam's Fellow-Travellers [re: Tariq Ramadan and Ayaan Hirsi Ali] - 'Contemplating with his customary scorn the artists who had embraced the Russian Revolution, Leon Trotsky wondered what it would take to break their attachment to a cause that would eventually murder many of them -- and kill Trotsky too, although he was yet to know it. "As regards a fellow-traveller," he said, "the question always comes up -- how far will he go?" Would the barbarism of the dictatorship of the proletariat persuade him to "change at one of the stations on to the train going the other way"? Or would he stay on for the rest of the ride?...' | # | (0) | Share

Beyond the damage to prospects for peace by teaching kids to covet something that isn't theirs -- Israeli cities for god's sake -- there is an even more chilling implication. In popular Arab mythology, people have the right to "resist occupation" by any means necessary (bombs on buses and in pizza parlors), so by labeling Israeli cities "occupied territory," the host is legitimizing any sort of thing inside Israel proper.

From Palestinian Media Watch: PA TV to kids: Israeli cities Haifa, Jaffa, Lod, Ramle, Acre are all "occupied cities"

Official Palestinian Authority TV continues to teach children that all of Israel is "occupied Palestine." A repeating message on the children's show The Best Home, currently broadcast three times a week during the month of Ramadan, is that all Israeli cities are "occupied" Palestinian cities.

The PA TV host refers to cities in Israel alternately as "1948 occupied cities," "occupied cities" or "occupied territories." The Israeli cities described as Palestinian cities include Haifa, Jaffa, Lod, Ramle and Acre.

The following are examples from three of the TV programs in which the PA TV host refers to Israeli cities as "occupied Palestinian cities."

PA TV host to girl: "You live in Jerusalem. Do you visit the 1948 occupied cities (Israeli cities)?"
Girl: "I've been to Hebron."
TV host: "No, Hebron is a city [in the Palestinian Authority] that we all can enter. The occupied cities - such as Lod, Ramle, Haifa, Jaffa, Acre (all Israeli cities) - have you visited them?"
Girl: "I've been to Haifa and Jaffa."
TV host: "Tell us, are they beautiful?"
Girl: "Yes..."
TV host: "We hope all children of Palestine will be able to go to the occupied territories, which we don't know and have never been able to see. Personally, I have never been there."
[PA TV (Fatah), Aug. 25, 2010]

PA TV host to children in studio:

"No doubt you've all been waiting to know lots of things about Ramadan in those days, in some of the occupied areas, in the occupied territories. Today we'll find out lots about Jaffa in those days of Ramadan."
[PA TV (Fatah), Aug. 22, 2010]

PA TV host to children in studio:

"Don't you want to see Ramadan from those days in an occupied Palestinian city, to which we hope to return?"
The children are told a story of Ramadan in Ramle.
[PA TV (Fatah), Aug. 24, 2010]

PA TV is controlled by Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's office.

See more examples on PMW's website of how the PA presents Israel as "occupied Palestine."

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

About twenty-five years ago I had my great success in affecting mass media coverage of the Middle East in one newspaper for one day. I had been complaining to a New York Times correspondent, who was briefly covering the Middle East beat, about the incitement, hatred, and extremism that appeared daily in the Arabic media was never mentioned in its Western counterpart.

To his credit, he came over to my office. I took a big desk and spread over it a couple of dozen issues of the Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS), a publication with which, in those pre-paperless days, I had filled whole bookcases. If you've never heard of FBIS it was a daily publication from the U.S. Department of Commerce that came out in different colored editions for each region of the world. All it did was translate radio and television programs along with some important speeches. Using or not using FBIS, for me, marked the difference between a serious researcher and a dilettante.

One after the other I showed him examples of the lies, the hatred, the calls for Israel's destruction, the screams for blood and murder, the slanders against America that appeared in the most prestigious and widely circulated and official of Arabic-language publications. Impressed, he actually wrote an article on it that appeared on the front page.

That happened once. And this was in the days when journalistic standards meant something and newspapers actually focused on publishing the news rather than ideological guidance to direct people toward believing the proper things.

Day after day throughout the Arabic-speaking world, Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, in schools and mosques, in the speeches of leaders and oppositionists, in mass media, hatred of Jews and Christians, of the West and America, rises into the air. This structural hatred has consequences. The best single sentence I've heard on this comes from a Saudi woman who wrote that what the big Usama bin Ladin did, the little Usama bin Ladin learned in the Saudi schools.

This massive system of hatred and extremism--known to everyone who lives in the Middle East--is largely kept hidden from the West. Why?

One reason is fear of the Islamists. In editing the two-volume Guide to Islamist Movements--a study of Islamist movements, leaders, ideas, and activities in 55 countries--I often met with the refusal of scholars to write chapters due to fear. In one case, I appealed to a professor in a small European country that he was merely being asked to write an objective scholarly overview, not to take any political positions or make any recommendations. He responded: "The local Islamists don't look at things that way."

Another reason is fear of their colleagues. To report on the hatred of others leads to accusations of being oneself a hater.

These are, of course, two major reasons why the Western media and politicians so downplay the issue of incitement and extremism among Muslims. But there is one more: the belief that their own people are so stupid and bigoted that they will respond to being told the truth by massive anti-Muslim pogroms. These elites believe that a public that accepts without murmur the construction of thousands of mosques is horribly intolerant because it objects to one being built at the site of the World Trade Center attack by a radical group with shadowy financing.

We don't have reliable studies of what goes on in North American mosques because academics and journalists won't do much beyond repeating what Muslim groups say. But we do know from infiltrators (sometimes with video tapes) or moderate Muslims that the incidence of radicalism and antisemitism among imams and activists is high. Recently, an outspoken moderate Muslim told me he was unwelcome to pray there by every mosque in his city. Asked to name mosques dominated by a moderate viewpoint, he could only come up with one, in a city hundreds of miles away from him.

A few years ago, I was at a secret conference on a tiny Mediterranean island. When I brought up the issue of incitement to murder Israelis in a conference, a high-ranking Palestinian (today a member of the Palestinian Authority cabinet) made a speech about how incitement was a terrible problem on both sides (not true, of course) and how he proposed a joint commission to investigate this issue. The audience applauded.

Immediately afterward, without illusions but because it seemed a neat thing to do, I went up to him and proposed that he and I form such a commission. He laughed in my face. Of course, there was not the slightest interest in doing so.

Continue reading "What Threatens Peace: A Mountain of Hate or A Few Nasty Words?"

Yes, the administration is denouncing a US state in our obeisance to the corruptocrats and torture states at the UN Human Rights Council. I'm glad to see Governor Brewer making hay of it. She deserves to: Brewer condemns report to UN mentioning Ariz. law

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer demanded Friday that a reference to the state's controversial immigration law be removed from a State Department report to the United Nations' human rights commissioner.

The U.S. included its legal challenge to the law on a list of ways the federal government is protecting human rights.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Brewer says it is "downright offensive" that a state law would be included in the report, which was drafted as part of a UN review of human rights in all member nations every four years.

"The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to 'review' by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional," Brewer wrote...

It all figures in to How Obama Sees America:

...The report -- part of what the UN Human Rights Council calls its "Universal Periodic Review," in which countries grade their own human rights records -- is both ludicrous and offensive. Let's take them in order.

The report reads like a term paper by a very earnest and very politically correct college freshman. After a few perfunctory words of praise for America in the introduction, the rest of the document is a catalogue of terrible liberal sins that are being washed away by wonderful liberal solutions, including (but not restricted to) ObamaCare; the recently passed financial reform law; suing Arizona for its law aimed to curb illegal immigration; the first White House Adviser on Violence Against Women; the "formation of the 9/11 Backlash Taskforce"; an internal review of the Justice Department's 2003 Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies; a commitment to "protecting the rights of incarcerated persons ... including the right to practice their religion"; and of course -- who could ever forget? -- President Obama's hosting "a historic summit with nearly 400 tribal leaders to develop a policy agenda for Native Americans where he emphasized his commitment to regular and meaningful consultation with tribal officials regarding federal policy decisions that have tribal implications."...

...t is yet more evidence that when the president and his administration scan the world for human rights violations, they are irresistibly drawn back to the grave injustices they believe have been and are being perpetrated by America.

It is an unprecedented and alarming thing to witness -- an administration that is not only unwilling to defend the United States but seems to take great joy and satisfaction in undermining her.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

[The following, by Eamonn McDonagh, is crossposted from Z Word, and comes as a conveniently timed fisking of the Ali Abunimah piece from the New York Times I scolded below. I told you it was a "rather hackneyed and repeatedly discredited comparison" comparing the Middle East with Northern Ireland.]

Regular readers of this blog will know that we have repeatedly argued against the usefulness of the Northern Ireland analogy applied to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Nevertheless, like the corpse of a drowned dog, it keeps bobbing to the surface again and again. The latest example is by Ali Abunimah in the New York Times. With a deep sigh and a heavy step I'll now proceed to take it apart.

The conflict in Northern Ireland had been intractable for decades. Unionists backed by the British government saw any political compromise with Irish nationalists as a danger, one that would lead to a united Ireland in which a Catholic majority would dominate minority Protestant unionists.

This is false. Only the most extreme factions of unionism, those associated with illegal terrorist groups, rejected any compromise with Catholic nationalists. The rest only baulked at whatever they perceived as a first step towards the end of the Union. And far from supporting Unionist intransigence successive British governments sought to encourage their Northern Irish citizens to reach an acceptable internal compromise.

Continue reading "Northern Ireland: Refutation Number 4539"

Speaking of Hamas...the New York Times printed yesterday an op-ed by professional anti-Israel activist and founder of the "Electronic Intifada," Ali Abunimah, purveying the rather hackneyed and repeatedly discredited comparison of the Middle East peace process with that which occurred in Northern Ireland: Hamas, the I.R.A. and Us.

Now, picture the absurdity. The Times presents into the mix an essay on the proper way forward in the peace process written by someone who does not believe in said process. Ali Abunimah has dedicated his life to the destruction of the Jewish State, gathering around him any and all allies, including the New York Times, in that effort. But don't expect the Times to hip its readers to that fact while it tries to administer the medicine of his prescription for a cure.

Abunimah is so extreme, and Times editors so willing to print anything these days, that he not only says Israel is bad, he says it's actually worse than Hamas:

...As for violence, Hamas has inflicted a fraction of the harm on Israeli civilians that Israel inflicts on Palestinian civilians. If violence disqualifies Hamas, surely much greater violence should disqualify the Israelis?...

This is a rather more straightforward example of moral perversion appearing in the pages of the Times than most conservative culture warriors refer to when criticizing the paper.

Via Sophia who writes to the Times:

To the editor:

This represents a new low in NYT editorials.

I'm nearly speechless.

Hamas is not only brutal to Israelis, it's a violent, repressive organization that terrorizes Palestinians, steals from the UN and is sworn to destroy not only Israel but Jews...

They don't care. The Times has completely lost the thread.

Update: See the post above for a fisking of the Middle East/Northern Ireland analogy.

Jeff Jacoby: Let the private sector fund stem-cell research - '...As it is, a host of private funders are already pouring money into stem-cell research. Just last month, Geron, the company that underwrote Thomson's work in 1998, announced plans to conduct the world's first human clinical trial of a therapy derived from embryonic stem cells, a treatment for damaged spinal cords. And Geron is only one of many corporations -- Aastrom Biosciences, Stemcells Inc., and Osiris Therapeutics are among the others -- using private dollars to fund cutting-edge stem-cell research...' | # | (0) | Share
Report: Egypt Uncovers Stockpile of Weaponry Intended for Hamas - 'Egyptian security forces are reported to have discovered 190 anti-aircraft missiles, anti-tank explosives, automatic weapons and other weaponry set to be smuggled to Hamas in the Gaza Strip...' | # | (0) | Share

[The following, by Daniel Greenfield, is crossposted from Sultan Knish. (Found via Huffington Post Monitor.)]

The Nazi propaganda rag Der Sturmer may have gone out of publication around the time that the Fuhrer's ashes were smoldering in his bunker beneath the Wilhelmstrasse, but its motto is present today in almost every liberal newspaper in the Western world. Der Sturmer's daily invocation of "Die Juden sind unser Unglück!" or "The Jews are our misfortune!" is omnipresent in the media coverage of almost anything involving the Middle East or Islamic terrorism.

The theme is much the same now as it was then, the Jews are responsible for all our problems. The presentation is of course much more subtle, but then Der Sturmer was considered vulgar even by much of the Nazi hierarchy, which preferred the more staid Völkisch Observer. Today's papers prefer to be in the Observer mode, the Storming they leave to the "plausible deniability" blogs of an Andrew Sullivan or a Glenn Greenwald, material that they pay for, but like a lot of the Nazi hierarchy and Der Sturmer, don't necessarily want to be too closely associated with.

reuters2.jpg

The ideas however are not particularly original. The Jews are to blame both for the wars and for losing them, a propaganda paradox put to good use by the Nazis. The idea that the Jews were physically responsible for 9/11 is an area that the media leaves to the fringe, but the suggestion that the Jews provoked Bin Laden's anger against America shows up in countless columns and op-ed's. One is a radical conspiracy theory, while the other is a mainstream media talking point, but in terms of consciously stoking hate, what exactly is the difference. Only that the latter is vague enough to be defensible, especially when bolstered by a few selectively chosen quotes from the man himself.

By linking Islamic terrorism to some form of Israeli provocation, and from there to the support for Israel by American Jews-- the same media which would commit seppuku rather than blame Muslims for Islamic terrorism, instead blames Jews for Islamic terrorism. The steady drumbeat of such rhetoric, which exonerates Muslims but indicts Jews, for the actions of Muslims, is brilliantly perverse. And it also puts the lie to the media's defense that it avoids attributing terrorism to Islam because it does not want to stoke bigotry. In reality, the media has no problem with using Islamic terrorism to stoke bigotry. It just has a different target in mind.

Behind the media's long ugly history of misreporting terrorism against Israel, has been that one fundamental narrative, that it is not Muslims who are responsible for Muslim terrorism, but the Jews. When a Muslim terrorist attack happens in Tel Aviv, Madrid or New York-- it turns out that the Jews are the ones to blame. It really doesn't matter whether an Israeli soldier kills a Muslim terrorist, or a Muslim terrorist kills a Jewish father of four driving home from work, it is never the Muslim that is at fault. Always the Jew. Forget about even splitting the difference. There is never any difference to split. It is always Israel's "humiliation" of Arab Muslims that is at fault for provoking their righteously murderous anger. A familiar theme that recalls Hitler's constant invocation of "German humiliation" at the hands of the Jews.

But all the talk of the Jews "humiliating" other peoples hinges on the topic of the Jews as a "Chosen Master Race". A superior people. A role that Nazis and Arab Nationalists both reserved for themselves. The theme is taken up in numerous outlets, Jonathan Cook who appears in The Guardian writes: "Israel's apartheid system is there to maintain Jewish privilege in a Jewish state". In a Hitlerian formulation, Philip Weiss who appears at the Huffington Post claims that Jeff Greene's criticism of the Ground Zero Mosque, "how privilege and power have transformed Jewish identity". Not that Jeff Greene opposes the mosque because he is following the polls as so many other politicians have done, but because he is a Jew. The Guardian charges that Israel is an "an enclave of Israeli Jewish privilege". That kind of rhetoric should be familiar. It is what Hitler described as "The anti-Semitism of reason" which "must lead to the systematic combating and elimination of Jewish privileges".

Continue reading "The Media's Anti-Semitic Hate Machine "

He Really Doesn't Want to Be Commander In Chief - 'It is not that we didn't know this before, but reading the New York Times - surely designed to be as favorable toward Obama as the reporter could possibly manage -- one is left slack-jawed. Obama doesn't like being commander in chief, isn't good at it, and has relied one tutor, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who is leaving next year. The report should be read in full...' | # | (2) | Share

At NRO, Andrew McCarthy has a good piece on Hamas, and the inability of so many so-called moderate leaders to condemn it:

Hamas is a shibboleth. If you want to know whether an ostensible Muslim "moderate" is really moderate, ask him if Hamas is a terrorist organization.

It is really not a hard question, even if Feisal Rauf can't -- or won't -- answer it. Rauf, the would-be imam of the controversial Ground Zero mosque, is also a stud in the State Department's stable of ready-to-travel-on-your-dime "moderates." That same State Department has branded Hamas a terrorist organization, and we can't even get it to say that about the Taliban, the guys we're fighting in the overseas contingency operation formerly known as the War on Terror.

During a WABC radio interview, Aaron Klein three times pressed Rauf to admit that Hamas is a terrorist organization. Rauf bobbed and weaved in classic Islamist style. "I'm not a politician," he replied, as if only politicians trouble themselves over whether terrorists are terrorists. "I try to avoid the issues. The issue of terrorism is a very complex question." Avoid the issues? You don't say!

But it is not a complex question, no more complex than "Does Derek Jeter play for the Yankees?" It is a straightforward question that Islamists complicate with clever casuistry, carefully designed to ring all the right chimes for our opinion elites and their media pitchmen...

Read the rest. If we hope to incubate a tolerant form of American Islam, inculcated with the values of American pluralism that will grow here and then go forth and multiply throughout the world, then Muslim leaders who, in word or in their hearts, cannot without any equivocation or hesitation condemn the likes of Hamas are worse than useless for this effort. It is a stage 1 litmus test. Pass it, or do not pass Go.

The role of information in American "Islamophobia" - '... it's possible that, especially with the Ground Zero Mosque controversy, America's view of American Muslims has changed since 9/11. The attacks of that day were launched from a far away place, and seemed to come from the hands of an enemy with no relationship to American Muslims. Since then, we have learned that the radical ideology behind 9/11 is not quite as alien as we thought. Some portion of the American Muslim community - presumably small, but we don't know how small - is drawn to it. Moreover, what looks like a considerable portion of those who hold themselves out (and are held out by the MSM) as leaders of American Muslims refuse to disassociate themselves from terrorist groups. They don't countenance al Qaeda, though they do blame America for that outfit's terrorist acts. But they won't repudiate other bloody terrorists, notably Hamas...' | # | (2) | Share

This is interesting. It sounds as though church and state have a complicated relationship in Italy, but at some point they've decided that Islam in particular has issues enough not to receive any government funding:

Mosques in Italy will not receive a share of income tax revenue the Italian government allocates to religious faiths each year. Hindu and Buddhist temples, Greek Orthodox churches and Jehovah's Witnesses will be eligible for the funds, according to a bill approved by the Italian cabinet in May and still must be approved by parliament.

Until now, the government had earmarked 8 percent of income tax revenue for Italy's established churches. The great majority of these funds go to the Catholic Church, although if they wish, individual tax payers may elect to give the money to charities and cultural projects instead.

The head of COREIS, one of Italy's largest Muslim groups, Yahya Pallavicini, said he was bitter that Islam had been denied the revenue from Italian income tax.

"Work should be begun on legally recognising those moderate Muslims who have for years shown themselves to be reliable interlocutors who are free of and fundamentalist ideology," he said.

Islam is not an established religion in Italy and there is only one official mosque in the country, Rome's Grand Mosque (photo). Politicians from the ruling coalition cite radical imams, polygamy and failure to uphold women's rights by Muslims immigrants as obstacles to recognising Islam as an official religion in Italy.

Until now, only the Catholic Church, Judaism and other established churches including Lutherans, Evangelists, Waldensians and 7th-day Adventists have received the income tax revenue from the Itallain government.

There are between one million and 1.5 million Muslims in Italy and 130 mosques linked the Muslim umbrella organisation UCOII across the country.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

I'm speaking of course about that 1966 classic about Israel's War of Independence, Cast a Giant Shadow. The film tells the, fairly historically accurate (as I'm given to believe), story of American WW2 vet Mickey Marcus, recruited to fight for what became Israel and named its first General in 2000 years. The star-studded cast alone is worth the rental, with Kirk Douglas in the starring role, and also featuring John Wayne, Yul Brynner, Frank Sinatra, Topol, Angie Dickinson, a mega-hot Senta Berger and others.

Campy at points, with some pretty dated effects and hokey fight scenes, it nevertheless has its moments. Here are a few of them, but by no means necessarily the best. These were just some I found interesting or entertaining. if you haven't seen the film, it's worth the rent. If it were made today it would be so full of moral equivocation and scenes ripped from the pages of revisionist historians with political axes to grind that it would be closer to fiction than this 1960's film. There seems to be a version available in parts on YouTube, but it is missing the beginning.

First, I bring you the Frank Sinatra bits, as Frank plays pilot of fortune Vince Talmadge. Marvel as he drops seltzer bottles on the enemy, then goes down with a panache rarely seen on film:

In this scene at the beginning of the film, Douglas (Marcus) is approached by a representative of the Haganah while out shopping for Christmas presents. "I'm an American, Major, that's my religion.":

In this scene, Kirk Douglas first receives a "message" from the British Ambassador, insisting that if the Jews would just be good, it would all be in their own best interest. Then John Wayne steps in with an American view:

Finally, in these two short scenes, the Ben-Gurion figure, for some reason named Jacob Zion in the film, tries to get across the significance of the City of Jerusalem. The issue is still topical:

Update: Well, whadaya know? By coincidence, Dave posted this about Sinatra's actual affinity for the Jews and Israel a couple of days ago.

Continue Reading

Home - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5

200 Most Recent Posts: 40/page

or Monthly Archives:  

"...tolerance can be a genuinely harmful force when it becomes a euphemism for moral exhaustion and a rigid or indifferent neutrality in response to very great moral issue -- when, in G.K. Chesterton's phrase, it becomes the virtue of people who do not believe in anything. For that paves the road to injustice."

-William Bennett


Last 5 Comments
In: The New York Times and Boston Globe: Never Let a Quadrupal Murder Shock You Out of Your Story Line
"In contrast to the few words (..."
By: Daniel in Brookline
-
In: Israel-Kurd magazine 'a cultural bridge'
"Shalom back:)..."
By: Sophia
-
In: Israel-Kurd magazine 'a cultural bridge'
"I applaud your support for Isr..."
By: David Holmes
-
In: The Liberal-Islamist Alliance
"Dont blame poverty for people'..."
By: EscapeVelocity
-
In: The Liberal-Islamist Alliance
"Please enlighten me on what po..."
By: EscapeVelocity
Links



Blogroll Me!

:Blogs:
Adam Holland
Adloyada
Agam's Gecko
Amy Ridenour
Armies of Liberation
Astute Blogger
Backseat Blogger
Backspin
Bagel Blogger
Bald-Headed Geek
Barry Rubin
Blazing Cat Fur
BlueTruth
Boker tov, Boulder
Bosch Fawstin
Breath of the Beast
CiF Watch
Cinnamon Stillwell
Classical Values
Combs Spouts Off
Coming Anarchy
Conservative Grapevine
Conservative Oasis Contentions
Contentious Centrist
Cox & Forkum
Creeping Sharia
Dancing with Dogs
DANEgerus
Dave Bender
Davids Medienkritik
Dean Esmay
Defending Crusader
Democracy Project
Dodgeblogium
Dreams Into Lightning
Dutchblog Israel
Exit Zero
FresnoZionism
Ghost of a Flea
GM's Place
The God Blog
Huff-Po Monitor
Huff-Watch
Hyscience
In Context
Insignificant Thoughts
Iraq the Model
Israpundit
Israellycool
Israel Matzav
Israel Seen
J Street Jive
Jerusalem Diaries
Jerusalem Posts
Jewish State
JIDF
JPundit
Kesher Talk
Legal Insurrection
Marathon Pundit
The Marmot's Hole
Martin Kramer
Matthew K. Tabor
Mere Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin
Mick Hartley
Mind of Mog
My Machberet
My Wide Blue Seas
Never Yet Melted
Normblog
Omnia21
One Jerusalem
Paula Says
Philosemitism
Point of no Return
PoliGazette
Political inSecurity
Random Thoughts
Ranting Sandmonkey
Red Planet Cartoons
Right Wing News
Rishon Rishon
Roger L. Simon
Seraphic Secret
Shawarma Mayor
Shekel
Shining City
Shira bat Sarah
ShrinkWrapped
Simply Jews
Smooth Stone
Snapshots
Soccer Dad
A Soldier's Mother
Solomon's House
Something Something
Somewhere on A1A
Stand for Israel
The Survivalist Blog
Tasty Infidelicacies
Tel Chai Nation
Texican Tattler
Themistocles' Shade
This Ain't Hell
TigerHawk
Tikkun Olam
Tom Glennon
Tools of Renewal
Tundra Tabloids
UCC Truths
The View From Here
View From Iran
The World
Yaacov Lozowick
Yid With Lid
Yourish
Z-Word

:New England Blogs:
Alphecca
Augean Stables
Bebere
Bloodthirsty Liberal
Boston Maggie
Boston's Patriots
Boulevard Girl
Business of Life
Daniel in Brookline
Hub Blog
Hub Politics
Internet128
JRTelegraph
Jules Crittenden
Kavanna
Libertarian Leanings
Maggie's Farm
Miss Kelly
N.E. Republican
Neo-Neocon
People's Republicans
Petitedov
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Shawmut
Sippican Cottage
sisu
Squaring the Globe
Technicalities
Universal Hub
Weekend Pundit
Who Knew?




Blogroll Policy



If You Enjoy This Site
Paypal Donate

Amazon Purchase
(Buy yourself something with this link and I will get a percentage.)

My Amazon Wish List

Worth a Click

CJUI

APT

Graphics

Remember

Solomonia Button

Smaller Button

Smallest Button

Note on Permissions:
You may feel free to use anything you find on this site as long as you're not selling it. Just give credit where credit is due is all. Thanks for stopping by!

Site (C)2003-2009 Solomonia.com

This site will not display properly at screen resolutions of less than 1024px wide.

Solomonia Store


Search


Archives
Recommended

Authors

Solomon
Martin Solomon

MaryM
Mary Madigan

HillelS
Hillel Stavis

Binah
Binah

Jon Haber
Jon Haber

Sophia
Sophia

Opinions expressed are those of the individual. No one speaks for any organization unless expressly stated.

Subscribe
Enter your Email for a Daily Digest of New Posts


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
(Be sure to whitelist feedblitz@mail.feedblitz.com if you aren't receiving updates.)

Click here for other subscription options, including Twitter, AIM, MSM and others.


Follow me on Twitter

Solomonia


rdf
rss2
atom

 Subscribe in a reader

Games

What They're Saying

"...keep up the great work. I check your site very frequently."
- Ed Lasky, American Thinker

"...always excellent..."
- Seraphic Secret

"...good writing, great content..."
- PeakTalk

"...unfailingly readable..."
- Jacob Laksin, FrontpageMag

Now Reading

Library Thing
Banner

Quality Diamond Crosses