Amazon.com Widgets

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

The Washington Post has actually picked up an AP story on the Gaza Beach incident that presents the Israeli side in a non-skeptical manner, and actually includes context for Israeli shelling in general (unlike most of the early reports that simply repeated Palestinian claims and added no context). This is good. Note the picture accompanying the article. Large size photos have already been distributed among the Palestinian Arab people for effective foreign-press photo-ops.

Israel: Gaza Blast Not From Israeli Shell

JERUSALEM -- An Israeli investigation into what caused an explosion on a Gaza beach that killed eight Palestinians will conclude that the blast was most likely caused by a mine planted by Palestinian militants and not an Israeli shell, military officials said Tuesday.

The Palestinians had blamed an Israeli shell for the killing of the civilians in the northern Gaza Strip on Friday, and had recognized as a hero a Palestinian girl whose image was broadcast around the world crying over her father's body at the scene.

While Israel had originally left open the possibility that it was responsible and expressed sorrow for the deaths, senior officials had suggested that Palestinian militants could have planted explosives on the beach and the army opened an investigation.

The military committee looking into the blast is expected to issue its findings later Tuesday.

The committee will announce that Israel was almost certainly not involved in the explosion and it was caused by explosives planted by the Hamas militant group, military officials said on condition of anonymity since the results were not official yet.

The blast occurred on the outskirts of the town of Beit Lahia, not far from where Palestinian militants frequently fire rockets toward Israel. Israel often shoots artillery in the area to prevent the rocket launchings.

According to the findings, shrapnel taken from two wounded Palestinians who were evacuated to Israeli hospitals showed that the explosives were not made in Israel, the officials said. In addition, the last Israeli shell fired toward Palestinian rocket launchers who operate in the area was seven minutes before the blast and landed 250 yards from the scene, the officials said.

Also, after the blast, Israeli military viewed Hamas militants collecting the shrapnel from the area, in an apparent effort to prevent authorities from revealing that the explosion was caused by explosives it had laid, the officials said.

The results of the investigation are also based on threats by Hamas to stop Israeli naval commandos from landing on the beach after group militants were killed in the area in an ambush by Israeli navy divers last month, the officials said.

The army has accounted for five of six of the shells that it fired in the area Friday evening before the blast, the officials said. The one shell that is not accounted for was fired before the five others _ more than ten minutes before the blast that killed the Palestinians _ and apparently landed further away than the shells that were fired later, the officials said.

Note, however, that so far the skeptical voice is only in reporting what Israelis are saying, while initial reports of Israeli culpability were constructed in such a way that they simply were "apparent" from the facts. Will future reports say that the explosion was "apparently" caused by Hamas's own munitions? That will be the question.

Defense Minister Peretz is promising action:

...Defense Minister Amir Peretz said that Israel would launch a "propaganda offensive" across the globe to prove its innocence if indeed the investigation exonerated the IDF of any blame for the explosion.

"I am aware of international officials to whom the truth is unimportant, nevertheless, Israel will try its best to explain its policies."...

And it looks like the uproar isn't cowing Peretz at all (looks like the Defense Ministry position is giving the mainstream Israeli left a chance to show they can be tough, too): 11 dead, including 2 kids, as IAF strikes Gaza Katyusha cell

Israel will no longer exhibit restraint toward Palestinian terrorists involved in anti-Israel operations, Defense Minister Amir Peretz said Tuesday following an Israeli air strike in Gaza that targeted a car carrying Islamic Jihad cell members on their way to launch GRAD-model Katyusha rockets at Israel. 11 people died in the strike and, according to the IDF, at least three of them were Islamic Jihad members.

"We will act with all our might and use all our means against any group that acts against us," Peretz said.

"We showed the necessary restraint in light ... of the international uproar that resulted, but it's over," Peretz continued...

...The Islamic Jihad said earlier that two of its operatives who were killed were Hamoud Wadiya, the group's top rocket launcher, and Shawki Sayklia. Seven Palestinian civilians, including two schoolchildren, were also killed Tuesday when the single missile fired by the IAF detonated the Katyushas inside the car. The army said it had proof that only one missile had been fired and that the terrorists were the only target in the strike...

Update: Meryl notes -- surprise! -- a biased Reuters headline and more: The spin begins: Media credulous on IDF report

Update 2: Roger L. Simon notes that The Guardian (who else?) took particular glee in swallowing the entire Palestinian line to demonize Israel.

Palestinian Media Watch draws the direct line between the faked footage (whatever the facts behind what happened on the beach, it's clear that the footage the PA broadcast was a fictional montage) of this latest incident and their same act after the al Dura incident: PA TV falsified Mohammed Al Dura clip as it falsified Gaza beach video

Finally (for now), Honest Reporting has a report and round-up of media irresponsibility: Gaza Beach Libel

This CNN report, while it conveys the Israeli findings, gives Human Rights Watch the final word stating that their "investigation" has drawn the opposite conclusions: Israel: Palestinian explosives caused beach deaths

Update 3: Judith Apter Klinghoffer goes after the Human Rights Watch statements: MARK GARLASCO IS AT IT AGAIN

Update 4: An "unofficial" recap of Israel's press conference is here.

Update 5: Charles has a series of links, including a take-down of Garlasco. The Human Rights Watch report is here.

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Unraveling the images on the Gaza beach (5 Updates).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/6374

While America slept -- or rather, while it was going about its business, we wrote last year, Gramscian thinking [the origin of today's fashionable and pervasive political correctness], like sewage leaking out of a cracked drainpipe into the surrounding... Read More

2 Comments

I've posted a few more observations and thoughts over at Augean Stables.

http://www.theaugeanstables.com/2006/06/13/slim-chance/

Most of it isn't very important, but the second to last comment I made notes a new anomaly that I don't think has been mentioned by anyone to date yet. It provides further evidence that the dead man isn't really dead.

This is NOT going to be a successful enterprise, no matter how many facts are uncovered in this moronic '1200 dead in jenin', al Doura repeat fiasco.

The reason why this will not be successful is plain.

The lie has been swallowed because this is what most of the world WANTS the reality to be. Facts are pointless. This is emotional. Not logical.

Racism is not conquered by facts on this planet ....YET

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]