Thursday, June 8, 2006
The National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus has weighed-in to the Commissioners of the next PC(USA) General Assembly in a rather predictable manner. No link, but they attempt to take a measured tone -- you know, drawing equivalencies between the violence of the cops, and the violence of the criminals by opposing "all" violence and all that...
We condemn all forms of violence, be they terrorist activities or state-sponsored. We especially condemn attacks against civilians, Palestinians and Israelis, be they suicide bombings or indiscriminate military strikes. We condemn all forms of injustice, including destruction of homes, confiscation of property, illegal appropriation of territories, and the illegal occupation of Palestine...
You get the picture... They support divestment, of course. Where the piece gets rather laughable is where they try to show that really, they have legitimate Jewish support for their positions...
As my emailer points out, this is really weak stuff. It probably would have been better to leave this part out rather than to draw attention to the fact that divestment is supported only by the tiny minority of extremists represented by the groups named above, as opposed to the bulk of the mainstream Jewish groups who stand against divestment.
Further, the letter is signed by Rev. Fahed Abu-Akel, who's own background contains some disturbing incidents, notably with his invitation of a rabid anti-Semite to give a college speech. See: The Layman: PCUSA's choice of anti-Semitic speaker prompts college apology, as well as Former PC(USA) moderator slanders, dodges, and Presbyterian anti-Semitism and Responses.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus Speaks.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/6341








targeted vs. indiscriminate
The National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus (NMEPC) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) condemned the Israel Defense forces for "indiscriminate military strikes.â€
I would be very interested, and, frankly, extremely surprised if the NMEPC could give an example of a single IDF strike that was "indiscriminate." IDF strikes are never indiscriminate, they are targeted to take out terrorists and terrorist infrastructure, just as Arab "suicide bombings," which the NMEPC condemns, are targeted to slaughter civilians.