Amazon.com Widgets

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Here's a very interesting release from the Jewish Action Taskforce concerning the upcoming General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA). I've reproduced it in full, so everything below this paragraph is a quote (with some trivial edits):

ACTION:

1. Write to the members of the General Assembly Council pointing out the inappropriateness of having Salam Al-Marayati as a speaker on the grounds, that he makes anti-Semitic statements, is a leading apologist for terrorists, and denies the right of Isrel to exist. Addresses here.

2. Sign and circulate the Call to the Presbyterian Church to Reverse its Anti-Semitic Resolution on Divestment

Dear Member of the General Assembly Council [I include this as a good part of the backgrounder, not as something you should copy and paste. -S],

I write to express my concern that the 217th GA may be starting off on the wrong foot. Among the speakers set to address the pre-assembly conference "Visions of Peace and Justice in Israel and Palestine" is Salam Al-Marayati, an apologist for the terrorists of Hamas and Hezbollah with a long record of anti-Semitic remarks.

On Sept. 12, 2001, Al-Marayati told KCRW-FM's "Which Way, LA?" program that he suspected "the State of Israel" of being behind the attacks because Jews "benefit the most from these kinds of incidents." Al-Marayati has compared Israel's supporters to Hitler on the grounds that "Just as Hitler forged a conflict between Judaism and Christianity,apologists for Israel crave for Islam to be at odds with both Judaism and Christianity." He issues blanket, unsubstantiated accusations against Israel for "defaming the Prophet."

Al-marayati's moral judgement is open to question. In 1996, pedestrians on a Jerusalem street were horrified when a driver, Muhammad Hamida, shouted "Allahu Akbar" as he drove his car onto a sidewalk and into the crowd at a bustop. One woman was murdered and twenty-tree innocent people injured. Muhammad Hamida was shot dead by a bystander before he could escape or hurt anyone else. Insead of condemning this act of murder, Al-Marayati focused on Hamida's death, which he called "a provocative act," and demanded the extradition of his executors to America "to be tried in a U.S. court" on terrorism charges."

Al Marayati claims that "Hezbollah Members are Freedom Fighters," that "When Patrick Henry said, 'Give me liberty or give me death,' that statement epitomized jihad," and that "American freedom fighters hundreds of years ago were also regarded as terrorists by the British." In the twisted mind of Al-Marayati ""Hezbollah is fighting for freedom," while American Christians who support Israel's right to exist are terrorists. "Supporters of Israel Are the Real Terrorists... The supporters of Israel have created a quiet reign of terror in
the U.S.."

Al-Marayati takes the position that the State of Israel should be destroyed.

Far from being an appropriate choice for inclusion on a panel of Jewish, Muslim, and Christian leaders "sharing their visions for a just peace," Al-Marayati is a man who condones terrorism, advocates the destruction of the Jewish State, and slurs Jewish Americans with old-fashioned anti-Semitic canards. This "Israel-basher with disturbing sympathies for Islamic terrorists," does not belong on a panel at the GA.

I urge you to move to protect the reputation of the PCUSA by finding a more appropirate speaker for the pre-assembly conference.

Sincerely yours.

BACKGROUND:

June 2006 the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church passed a notorious resolution calling for divestment form Israel.

The General Assembly, which meets only every other year, will meet in June 2006 in Birmingham Alabama.

The GA will be preceded by a pre-assembly conference, "Visions of Peace and Justice in Israel and Palestine," for which three speakers have been announced to date:

  • Mr. Mark Pelavin, Associate Director of the Religious Action Center of Reformed Judaism
  • Mr. Salam Al-Marayati, Director of Muslim Public Affairs Council
  • Dr. Munib Younan, Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land

BACKGROUND ON AL-MARAYATI:

Daniel Pipes:

Mr. Al-Marayati, like so many other American Muslim leaders, purveys an extremist political agenda... Here are three elements of his radicalism: First, he wraps the American flag around some of the least attractive features of Middle Eastern life. In 1993, he memorably asserted that "When Patrick Henry said, 'Give me liberty or give me death,' that statement epitomized jihad [Islamic holy war]." In 1996, he made the silly and inaccurate observation that "American freedom fighters hundreds of years ago were also regarded as terrorists by the British." Mr. Al-Marayati's intent here is obvious: to render jihad and terrorism acceptable to Americans.

Second, Mr. Al-Marayati apologizes for the most ghastly Middle Eastern regimes and draws moral equivalencies between them and America. In his view, Iraq is no better or worse than America: "Saddam Hussein's behavior in and around Iraq has been characterized as reckless. The same can be said about U.S. policy as a result of its reactionary mode." (How Mr. Al-Marayati can say such things is a mystery when, as the Los Angeles Times has reported, his cousin in Iraq "died of kidney disease a few years ago because he could not obtain medicine or proper surgical care; several other family members have been tortured and killed for opposing" Saddam's regime.)

Third, Mr. Al-Marayati turns a blind eye to terrorism if it is of a fundamentalist Muslim persuasion. Take the February 1996 incident when a Palestinian named Muhammad Hamida shouted the fundamentalist war cry, Allahu Akbar (Allah is Great), as he drove his car intentionally into a crowded bus stop in Jerusalem, killing one Israeli and injuring 23 others. Before he could escape or hurt anyone else, Hamida was shot dead. Commenting on the affair, Mr. Al-Marayati said not a word about Hamida's murderous rampage but instead focused on Hamida's death, which he called "a provocative act," and demanded the extradition of his executors to America "to be tried in a U.S. court" on terrorism charges."

Statements like this have correctly won Mr. Al-Marayati a reputation of being "pro-terrorist," as New York Daily News columnist Sidney Zion writes, and "an Israel-basher with disturbing sympathies for Islamic terrorists," according to a New York Post editorial.

Condemning Israel's Existence:

The establishment by force, violence, and terrorism of a Jewish state in Palestine in 1948 as well as the expansion of that state in succeeding years involved the unjust and illegal usurpation [sic] of Muslim and Christian lands and rights. To recognize the legitimacy of that crime is a crime in itself and any agreement which involves such recognition is unjust and untenable. The League of Ulama in Palestine declared on September 14, 1993 that no one has the authority to concede the rights of the Islamic Ummah in Palestine. With this in mind we assert that the recognition of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands by a faction within a Palestinian group is meaningless.(Statement of North American Muslim Organizations Concerning "Gaza-Jericho Agreement," signed by MPAC-led by Al-Marayati, ICSC, and eight other organizations; December 17, 1993)

* Justifying Terrorism; Criticizing U.S. policy of opposition to Hamas:

A further impediment to the U.S. ability to deal with terrorism is the manipulation of U.S. policy on this issue. Some examples of this would be the efforts of the Israelis to win support against HAMAS or those of the Egyptian, Algerian, and Saudi Arabian governments to win their support against their respective domestic opposition. The Israeli confrontation with HAMAS is the direct result of its, often brutal, occupation of the West Bank and Gaza for over 31 years. The other three cases are essentially domestic political disputes between the regimes in power and their opposition. The use of terror by the groups in question is the direct result of their (often illegal) exclusion from the political process and also resultant from the use of repressive or primary terrorism by the governments in question.(MPAC, "A Position Paper on U.S. Counterterrorism Policy," June 1999)

* Excusing Hizballah's terrorism:

QUESTION: You mentioned Hizballah, do you consider it to be more of a, I guess a national liberation movement or a terrorist group?
AL-MARYATI: I don't think any group should be judged 100% this or that, I think every group is going to have, um, its claim of liberation and resistance there's the part that deals with the military confrontation with Israel and if you look at the numbers though, Hizballah attacks against Israeli civilians are like a fraction of Israeli attacks against the Muslims.(Salam al-Marayati at the University of Pennsylvania, November 1997) [Link]

On September 11, 2001-the day of the devastating terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center-Salam al-Marayati, Executive Director and one of the Founders of MPAC, stated during an appearance on KCRW-FM's "Which Way, LA?" program that "we should put the State of Israel on the suspect list":

"If we're going to look at suspects, we should look to the groups that benefit the most from these kinds of incidents, and I think we should put the state of Israel on the suspect list because I think this diverts attention from what's happening in the Palestinian territories so that they can go on with their aggression and occupation and apartheid policies." [Link]

Salam al-Marayati and his Muslim Public Affairs Council, in their own words:

I. Justifying Arab Terrorism and Calling Israel and its Supporters "the Real Terrorists":

Justified Future Terrorism Against Americans: In an April 4, 1997 article, "What Do We Expect?," distributed by the MPAC, Mr. Marayati justified future terrorist violence against American targets. He wrote: "Where Israel goes, our government follows...What is important is whether the American people are aware of and ready for the consequences...America is much more vulnerable than Israel and has much more to lose." He pointed to the fact that, unlike Israel, America has "greater investments" in the Arab and Muslim world, "from the oil in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf, to the rubber industry in Malaysia," Marayati warned: "[W]hen people are pushed to despair and thrown over the edge of hate, anger and insecurity, one target [i.e. an American target] will be more accessible than the other [i.e. an Israeli target]."

Justifying a Hamas Suicide Bombing: After the March 1997 Hamas suicide bombing in Tel Aviv, in which three Israeli women were murdered, an MPAC press release on March 21, 1997, justified the violence, asserting: "The Prime Minister of Israel...bears the brunt of responsibility for the loss of innocent lives...Because the Palestinian people have no avenues to redress their grievances, some of them have been pushed beyond the margins of society and have adopted violent reactions to express their despair and suffering."

"Supporters of Israel Are the Real Terrorists": "Our pluralistic society has become prisoner to a country that follows racism and apartheid in its policies...The supporters of Israel have created a quiet reign of terror in the U.S. People cannot speak loudly against the apartheid policies of Israel." (Editorial in The Minaret, Vol.20, No. 5 [1998]; Salam al-Marayati is a member of the 6-man Editorial Board.)

"Israel was established by terrorism": "The establishment by force, violence, and terrorism of a Jewish state in Palestine in 1948 as well as the expansion of that state in succeeding years involved the unjust and illegal usurpation of Muslim and Christian lands and rights...A peaceful solution to the problem of Palestine requires a change in the racist, chauvinistic, and militaristic nature and attitude of the current regime." (Public statement signed by the MPAC, and nine other groups, September 17, 1993)

"Hezbollah Members are Freedom Fighters": "Hezbollah is fighting for freedom...This is legitimate." (MPAC Senior Advisor Maher Hathout, at the National Press Club, June 18, 1998.)

"The Only Thing They Can Do is Throw Bombs": "The only thing [Arab terrorists in Israel] can do is throw a bomb in a market or send somebody to suicide, we don't have enough ability to target real targets in Israel." (MPAC Senior Advisor Maher Hathout, in a Panel Discussion on Capitol Hill, June 18, 1998.)

Comparing Muslim Terrorists to America's Founding Fathers: "Most Islamic movements have been branded as terrorists as a result of the rising extremism from a handful of militants. American freedom fighters hundreds of years ago were also regarded as terrorists by the British." (MPAC president Salam al-Marayati, The Minaret, June 1996)

II. Denouncing the U.S., Accusing it of "Terrorism":

Comparing the U.S. to Saddam Hussein: "Saddam Hussein's behavior in and around Iraq has been characterized as reckless. The same can be said about U.S. policy as a result of its reactionary mode." (MPAC President Salam al-Marayati, "Perspective on Operation Desert Strike," MSA News, Sept. 5, 1996)

Condemning America for "Terrorism": In response to America's attack on terrorist targets in Afghanistan and Sudan in August 1998, MPAC Senior Advisor Maher Hathout said: "Our country is committing an act of terrorism. What we did is illegal, immoral, unhuman, unacceptable, stupid and un-American." He also said America's anti-terror action would be to blame for future hate crimes in the U.S.: "If our country commits hate crimes, why should we not expect the uneducated to do the same?" (Los Angeles Times, August 22, 1998)

Comparing Terrorist Bombings and America's Raids: The MPAC condemned America's attack on terrorist targets in Afghanistan and Sudan in August 1998, on the grounds that "violence emanating from a superpower, bypassing due process and legitimate international channels, against poor countries is illegal, immoral and illogical..." (MPAC press release, August 24, 1998)

III. Anti-Jewish Statements:

"Jewish Unlawfulness": "Jewish unlawfulness is tolerated because powerful brokers can dictate terms on Congress and the Administration." (MPAC president Salam al-Marayati, quoted in The Minaret, May-June 1994)

Comparing Israel's supporters to Hitler: "Just as Hitler forged a conflict between Judaism and Christianity, apologists for Israel crave for Islam to be at odds with both Judaism and Christianity." (MPAC president Salam al-Marayati, in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 1994)

Defending Holocaust-denier Roger Garaudy: After Garaudy was fined by a French court for denying the Holocaust: "Garaudy is not the first one to question the holocaust...As usual, Muslim organizations and leaders in the United States were silent on the sentence imposed on Garaudy. The exception was the Muslim Public Affairs Council that issued an immediate condemnation statement...to persecute him for his right to express his opinion and question some events is a clear violation of his basic human rights...Muslim organizations should have taken the case to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights." (Editorial in The Minaret, Vol.20, No.3 [1998]; Salam al-Marayati is a member of the 6-man Editorial Board.)

Accusing Israel of "Defaming Mohammed": "Israel created an environment of hate, and it bears responsibility for dehumanizing Muslims, defaming the Prophet [Mohammed], and supporting policies of Judaicizing [sic] the Holy Land." (MPAC president Salam al-Marayati, MPAC Action Alert, July 7, 1997)

Further Background:

Sensible people within the Presbyterian Church are working hard to get divestment repealed.

http://www.enddivestment.com/
http://www.bearing-witness.org/
http://www.pcusa.org/pcnews/2006/06188.htm
http://c4rpme.org/index.html

5 Comments

Q. Why is the Presbyterian Church inviting Salam Al-Marayati to a Peace and Justice conference?

A. Because this church is anti-Swww.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/ mt/mt-renamedcomments.cgi?entry_id=8027 emitic.

Q. Why is the Presbyterian Church inviting Salam Al-Marayati to a Peace and Justice conference?

A. Because this church is anti-Swww.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/ mt/mt-renamedcomments.cgi?entry_id=8027 emitic.

OK, now that's just weird.

Why is the Presbyterian Church inviting Salam Al-Marayati?

Some possible answers:

1. The Hezbollah terrorists already had plans for that day and could not come????

2. If someone as outlandish as Salam Al-Marayati is the spokesman for the Palestinians it makes Hamas not look so bad?????

3. They want to see how much they can destroy any relationships between American Jewish interests and the PCUSA???

4. The PCUSA leaders love to see themselves negatively portrayed in the press?????

an interesting essay:

Posted on Fri, Aug. 19, 2005
Presbyterian Church is unfair in targeting Israel for divestmentBy Rebecca KuikenThis month, the Presbyterian Church of the United States took the next step in its plan to sell its investments in companies that do business in Israel. It announced the list of companies, including Motorola and United Technologies, that it intends to target.
As a Presbyterian clergywoman with missionary roots in the Middle East, a strong commitment to human rights and peace, and a deep love of interfaith dialogue, I am dismayed and heartbroken by my denomination's actions regarding divestment. Not only has divestment, even ``selective divestment,'' contradicted and undermined a half-century of the church's commitment to a two-state solution, it has seriously eroded a much-valued relationship with the Jewish community.
For over 50 years, the Presbyterian Church has affirmed the rights of Israel and the Palestinians to exist within their own safe and secure borders. Church leaders cannot point backward to past ``even-handed'' commitments while we now place our political weight solely upon the Israeli side of the Middle East teeter-totter and call it balanced.
How can we speak about ``selective divestment'' from corporations like Caterpillar, because of a connection with the Israeli government and occupation, while failing to investigate selective divestment from oil companies in Saudi Arabia and their connection with funding Palestinian terrorism? After years of commitment not to take sides in the Israeli-Palestine conflict, what pitched us off course?
Our sense of timing is off. Just when Israel is departing from Gaza, our denomination announced which companies it has targeted for possible divestment. How ironic: Israel is leaving one of the occupied territories lock, stock and barrel, and we reward it with threats of punishment.
This is short-sighted and adds to the perception that we have lost any pretense of impartiality. The church's policy papers on divestment are no longer balanced. Misreading or simplistically truncating decades of Middle East history by stating that Israel's occupation of the West Bank ``has proven to be the root of evil acts committed against innocent people on both sides of the conflict,'' is simply wrong. Terrorism against Israelis existed for years before the occupation.
I, like many peacemakers and clergy, Jews, Christians and Muslims, am deeply critical of actions taking place in the occupied territories. But I share the concern, expressed by Rabbis for Human Rights, which tirelessly defends Palestinians, that the Presbyterian position is ``inaccurate and inadequate to explain the situation in all its tragic moral complexity.''
I am opposed to divestment out of an overriding concern that our Presbyterian house is not in order when it comes to issues of anti-Semitism. Christianity has a deplorable track record on relationships with Muslims and Jews. Most Christians alive today have not participated in this history, yet it is a legacy that persists in its capacity to fuel memory, fear and reactivity. Our divestment policy ignores this.
This does not deny Christians the right to speak out or to challenge the behavior of any nation that acts unjustly. However, demonization of Israel is a form of anti-Semitism. When we paint Israel as the ``root of evil,'' which we did in our General Assembly's resolution, this is demonization. When Christian denominations shine the spotlight of human rights on Israel while paying scant attention to the gender caste system in Saudi Arabia, for instance, this is demonization.
The concept of divestment is deeply tied to the moral imaginations of most Protestants over 45 with South Africa, where the systemic evil of apartheid called for prolonged tactics. Our denomination's talk of divestment lends unwarranted moral support to those who crassly demonize Israel with the ``apartheid'' label while using ``divestment'' as a means to isolate, weaken and destroy Israel.
The Christian Church's integrity in the Middle East calls us to strengthen relationships with Jews and Muslims who renounce violence. Divestment without partnership breaks a critical relationship and undermines the integrity of the church's witness.

The Rev. Rebecca Kuiken is a Presbyterian pastor of the Stone Church of Willow Glen in San Jose and moderator of the San Jose Presbytery.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/12423061.htm

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]