Saturday, August 13, 2005
The ELCA was today scheduled to be the latest in a string of Protestant denominations to adopt resolutions condemning Israel's Security Fence. Most of the resolutions passed so far have been noxious resolutions noted for their one-sidedness and blindness toward Arab responsibility. In more than one case, more modest resolutions have been set aside at the last moment in favor of resolutions containing more ideologically and morally blind language.
I have it on good authority that the resolution that passed today was, while still imperfect, modified in negotiations by an interfaith group and is a "darn sight better" than the original proposal. This looks to be at least a bit better news than we have been used to.
Will post more information when I have it.
Update: Here is the Reuters report: U.S. Lutherans criticize Israeli security wall
The resolution, titled "Peace Not Walls" was approved 668 to 269 at the biennial assembly in Orlando, Florida, of the sixth largest U.S. Christian denomination, and church leaders said a campaign for peace had become urgent in light of the Israeli security barrier under construction on Palestinian land.
Before the vote, Bishop Munib Younan, representing the denomination's sister Lutheran church in Palestine, told the 1,108 assembly members that his congregation had been split by the wall and church attendance was dropping.
"The future of the Palestinian (Lutheran) church is at stake because the current conditions are causing our children to leave in increasing numbers," Younan said via telephone.
Some critics of the resolution warned that the world might hear only the catchy title, which spotlights what Israel considers an essential defensive barrier against terrorism, without understanding the nuances of the church campaign.
"They're creating a religious document, but when it gets to the Mideast, people are reading a political document," said Dexter Van Zile of the Boston-based David Project, an Israeli advocacy group. "The Arab public is going to see 'another church is against Israel.'"...
Here are a couple of quotes from an email I received:
That didn't happen with the Presbyterians last year, and the UCC or the Disciples of Christ last month...
..."Still, the resolution gave the leaders of the ELCA an opportunity to broadcast a dishonest narrative about the Arab/Israeli conflict to their members and to the general public. If you look at the map of the separation barrier on display at the back of the hall housing Augsburg Fortress Press, you won't see any accompanying images from the terror attacks the barrier was designed to prevent. The leaders of ELCA tried to portray the separation barrier as if it were built in a vacuum, not in response to the violence of the Second Intifada which killed more than 1,000 Israelis."
Van Zile also criticized ELCA's leadership for not soliciting input from Israelis in crafting the document.
"During debate, ELCA leaders announced that the document was created with input from representatives of the Middle East Council of Churches. To suggest that the MECC can act as a neutral arbiter between the Israelis and Palestinians is a case of intellectual malpractice. Member churches of the MECC are all located in Muslim majority countries and as such are made up of beleaguered populations beholden to governments that do not embrace notions of religious freedom and tolerance. They are not free to speak the truth about the religious nature of the war against Israel."
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Breaking: Evangelical Lutheran Church of America Adopts Modified Security Fence Resolution - Updated.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/4580





Leave a comment to: Breaking: Evangelical Lutheran Church of America Adopts Modified Security Fence Resolution - Updated
Subscribe to This Thread Without Leaving a Comment
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!