Sunday, August 14, 2005

Far be it for me to underestimate the MSM's ability to gloss over and hide the more extreme views of people who can be used for the MSM's own political agenda -- witness the absolute non-reportage of the large "anti-war" demonstrations organizers' ties to extreme Left groups -- but I think the era of Cindy Sheehan is reaching its limit. Not only because the press is likely to start realizing that they're overdoing it, even by their own standards, but her activities are now turning into what's more accurately described as "antics," and because the more she speaks, the more difficult it is becoming to keep a gloss on what she says (and what the group that's using her stands for). Omri at Mere Rhetoric and Israpundit notes the following quote:

Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a U.S. soldier who was killed in Sadr City, Iraq, on April 4, 2004, expressed her distress and frustration... "Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. Am I stupid? No, I know full-well that my son, my family, this nation, and this world were betrayed by George [W.] Bush who was influenced by the neo-con PNAC agenda after 9/11."

You can almost feel the news producers cringing.

I've never linked to Wonkette before, in fact, I'm not sure I've ever read Wonkette, but this extract posted at Winds of Change is spot-on (I, like Armed Liberal who posted it, agree with it all aside from what she says about the Administration):

Is that what the debate has come to? Which side can corral the saddest crop of widows, parents, and orphans? Call it a harms race. Better: an ache-off. We hope the grimly absurd image of two competing camps of mourners illustrates why it is we've been somewhat reluctant to weigh in on Sheehan's cause: Grief can pull a person in any direction, and whatever "moral authority" it imbues, we can't claim that Sheehan has it and those mothers who still support the war don't. The Bush administration knows all about exploiting tragedy for its own causes, including re-election. Whatever arguments there are against the war in Iraq, let's not make "I have more despairing mothers on my side" one of them. The only way to win a grief contest is for more people to die.

Never underestimate the American people's ability to "get it." Cindy Sheehan is pretending to wish to speak to the President again, but most people understand that she's made it clear there's no point to it.

She lost her son. That buys a LOT of leeway, but when you use that loss for politics, and you start spouting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, and you start saying things that some people feel puts other kids lives at stake, you start squandering that good will and may even start calling down for a bit of tough love.

Let Cindy Sheehan practice her free speech, but please beatify someone else.

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Not a Saint.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/4583



2 Comments

I think everybody misses Cindy Sheehan’s value to the left. She allows them to avoid the debate.

To the left, the most exalted position one could have is that of victim. It cleanses one of all sins and indiscretions and renders one impervious to criticism. (This especially manifests itself in their forgiveness of all manner of atrocities committed by the Palestinians.) I remember a post on another blog (can’t remember which) about Sheehan. The post and the first few comments were quite innocuous, yet the next commenter accused them of “spit[ting] on” the mothers of the dead. Cindy Sheehan’s status as victim allows her supporters label all criticism of her as insensitive or worse.

The left has been consistently losing the battle of ideas for twenty-plus years. The anti-war movement lost the debate before the war and they lost the last two elections, which were greatly influenced by foreign policy. The last thing they want is a debate. That’s why Cindy Sheehan is their perfect spokesperson. The point is not to spark debate; the point is to stifle debate. She can spout whatever nonsense she wants while her supporters can suppress any dissent by declaring all criticism of her beliefs, statements, motives, etc. to be out of bounds.

It's so interesting:,

Leave a comment to: Not a Saint





(Requires you leave a comment.)


Subscribe to This Thread Without Leaving a Comment


Comment Info and Policy:

1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.

2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.

3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...

4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.

Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.

It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."

5) Enjoy your stay!

"Who would have thought it possible that one of the great superpowers would take serious economic risks for the sake of a disinterested ideal?"

-Refusenik Mark Azbel, on news of passage of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment, from Philip Spiegel's Triumph Over Tyranny.


Links



Blogroll Me!

:Blogs:
Adam Holland
Adloyada
Agam's Gecko
Amy Ridenour
Armies of Liberation
Astute Blogger
Backseat Blogger
Backspin
Bagel Blogger
Bald-Headed Geek
Banagor
Blazing Cat Fur
BlueTruth
Boker tov, Boulder
Bosch Fawstin
Breath of the Beast
Celestial Blue
Cinnamon Stillwell
Classical Values
Combs Spouts Off
Coming Anarchy
Conservative Grapevine
Conservative Oasis Contentions
Contentious Centrist
Cox & Forkum
Creeping Sharia
DANEgerus
Dave Bender
Davids Medienkritik
Dean Esmay
Defending Crusader
Democracy Project
Dodgeblogium
Dreams Into Lightning
Dutchblog Israel
Exit Zero
Fightin' w/Grabes
FresnoZionism
Ghost of a Flea
GM's Place
The God Blog
Hyscience
In Context
Iraq the Model
Israpundit
Israellycool
Israel Matzav
Jerusalem Diaries
Jerusalem Posts
JIDF
JPundit
Kesher Talk
Little Green Footballs
Marathon Pundit
The Marmot's Hole
Martin Kramer
Matthew K. Tabor
Mere Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin
Mick Hartley
My Machberet
My Wide Blue Seas
Normblog
Omnia21
One Jerusalem
Paula Says
Philosemitism
Point of no Return
PoliGazette
Political inSecurity
Random Thoughts
Ranting Sandmonkey
Red Planet Cartoons
Right Wing News
Rishon Rishon
Roger L. Simon
Sense of Events
Seraphic Secret
Shekel
Shining City
Shira bat Sarah
ShrinkWrapped
Simply Jews
Smooth Stone
Snapshots
Soccer Dad
A Soldier's Mother
Solomon's House
Something Something
Somewhere on A1A
Stand for Israel
Tel Chai Nation
Texican Tattler
TheRIGHTJournal
This Ain't Hell
TigerHawk
Tom Glennon
Tools of Renewal
Tundra Tabloids
UCC Truths
The View From Here
View From Iran
The World
Yid With Lid
Yourish
Z-Word

:New England Blogs:
Alphecca
And Rightly So
Annoy A Liberal
Augean Stables
Bloodthirsty Liberal
Boston Maggie
Boston's Patriots
Business of Life
Daniel in Brookline
Hub Blog
Hub Politics
Internet128
JRTelegraph
Jules Crittenden
Kavanna
Libertarian Leanings
Maggie's Farm
Miss Kelly
N.E. Conservative
N.E. Republican
Neo-Neocon
New Wineskins
Petitedov
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Sippican Cottage
sisu
Sons of Liberty
Squaring the Globe
Technicalities
Universal Hub
Weekend Pundit
Who Knew?




Blogroll Policy



If You Enjoy This Site
Paypal Donate

Amazon Purchase
(Buy yourself something with this link and I will get a percentage.)

My Amazon Wish List

Worth a Click

CJUI

Graphics

Remember

Solomonia Button

Smaller Button

Smallest Button

Note on Permissions:
You may feel free to use anything you find on this site as long as you're not selling it. Just give credit where credit is due is all. Thanks for stopping by!

Site (C)2003-2009 Solomonia.com

This site will not display properly at screen resolutions of less than 1024px wide.

Solomonia Store


Search


Recommended

Authors

Solomon
Martin Solomon

MaryM
Mary Madigan

HillelS
Hillel Stavis

Binah
Binah

Jon Haber
Jon Haber

Sophia
Sophia

Amazon Search

Archives
1/28/03-2/4/03
Subscribe
Enter your Email for a Daily Digest of New Posts


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
(Be sure to whitelist feedblitz@mail.feedblitz.com if you aren't receiving updates.)
rdf
rss2
atom

 Subscribe in a reader

Now Reading

Recently Watched

Library Thing
Banner

Quality Diamond Crosses