Saturday, December 18, 2004
Charles Moore of The Telegraph, that is. Addressing issues of free speech, offensive speech and protected groups. Don't miss. (Previous entry here.)
Telegraph: It is Muslims who have most to fear from Islamists:
So my question to whoever happens to be Home Secretary is whether it would be an offence under the new law to assert this proposition. Muslims are also very offended by any pictorial depiction of the Prophet; so I asked whether such depictions would also be an offence under the law.
Fiona Mactaggart, who is minister for race equality, has accused critics of the new law of a misunderstanding. It is not a blasphemy law, she says. You can say anything you like about the beliefs: what you will not be allowed to do is to insult the believers because of what they believe. I do not see how this distinction will be possible to maintain: it is certainly not one which Muslims accept.
On this page on Tuesday , Iqbal Sacranie, the secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, clearly saw the law as a way of preventing "the vilification of dearly cherished beliefs". He sees attacks on the Prophet as attacks on all Muslims - therefore, in his view, they should be banned. That is what Muslims think Labour has promised them.
The reaction to my own article shows the problem. The Muslim Association of Britain (not to be confused with the MCB) said that what I had written was "repulsive", composed out of an "arrogance borne by only the most zealous of racists". Because of my "filth and drivel", I should be dismissed from The Daily Telegraph, and the paper should apologise. Just in case the point was missed, the MAB reminded the paper of the lessons of the Salman Rushdie affair...
...So here we have a body with activists who support the killing of Israeli Jews, telling people in Britain that they must stop displaying religious intolerance - all of this listened to respectfully by the BBC. I am trying to avoid the word "Orwellian", but I can't...
Read all.
Americans, it's relavent to us, to. Unwritten PC rules, hate-speech standards and legal limits on free speech can do the same thing here and handcuff our ability to discuss important issues.
(via Dhimmi Watch)
Charles Moore is the previous editor of the"Daily Telegraph" and he will not be easily ignored. This is a brave thing he is doing given the malice of protagonists accustomed to threat rather than rhetoric. He is to be applauded.