Saturday, December 18, 2004
I don't know about wise men, but this idea feels like it's about 2000 years old. Yet another proposal to bring the mountain to Muhammad. Don't they know that just makes The Prophet fat and lazy?
Ah, I hear you say, but this high-level delegation is really high level this time. But I say it doesn't matter whether the delegation is composed of ex-Presidents or current Secretaries of State - it's just as easy to say "NO" to either. In fact, the higher level the delegation, the more value there is to the refusal in the eyes of the despots and their followers.
Boston Globe: A role for three 'wise men' By Paul Smyke
Leveraging the work of those who came before him, President Bush should appoint a "wise men" triad consisting of Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Jimmy Carter...
OK, that's enough of that. Read the rest on your own if you must.
One final note. When I do one of these posts I usually Google the author so I can see if there's any context or agenda the paper is leaving out. Often I find they're the head of some "progressive" group or another. This time I found something a bit different.
Turns out Mr. Smyke was on the Board of something called the Cuba Policy Foundation. This group is apparently dedicated to American policy change toward Cuba - lifting the embargo, etc...no surprise there (he also donated to the Kerry campaign - no surprise there, either), until I went back to the group's front page and found that the entire Board had resigned en masse back in 2003 due to Castro's abuses:
"We organized, funded and supported the Foundation because we hoped, and had reason to believe, that its energetic efforts to modify the ban on Cuba trade, travel and investment might succeed over time. We can only conclude, however, that in spite of its claims to the contrary, Cuba does not share our enthusiasm for a more open relationship. For this reason we have tendered our resignations.
"Daily operations of the Foundation will cease as of this date. The corporation will technically remain in existence, and Mr. Alexander will maintain its website as a public resource."...
So, while I think the effort was likely misguided, I have to tip my hat to a rare display of substance.
Now about that mountain...
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: "A role for three 'wise men'".
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/3670
2 Comments
Leave a comment to: "A role for three 'wise men'"
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
I read your blog almost everyday and have never commented before. What an intellectually, morally bankrupt idea this gentleman has. Did he rewrite history or deliberatley not want to state that Carter and Clintons role in the mideast were diasters in and of themselves and in fact made the situation worse due to their intervention? Frightening article, thanks for the exposure!
Eileen
Thanks, Eileen. Yeah, whenever I see the words "Jimmy Carter" placed in pious terms my eyes cross. This one's got a tripple-whammy.