Sunday, March 16, 2008
Richard Landes has a lengthy piece exploring the connection following some reactions by his academic colleagues: Mercaz Harav And The G-Word. Yes, there is still seriousness in academia:
...In sum, SPME's statement struck many thoughtful people who are by no means hostile to the State of Israel as loose talk that both discredits the organization and debases the language in ways that do not serve to benefit either a responsible and free society or the Jews.
I must confess that I too, upon first reading the statement found it excessive in its rhetoric, unnecessarily insistent that the reader share the writer's indignation at this wanton slaughter, but that they also assent to a "reading" of the conflict that drew sides in black and white. But as I read the objections, in particular the comparison with Baruch Goldstein - whose name Alan Weisbard is justifiably loath even to mention - I became increasingly convinced that the statement, rather than immoderate in its rhetoric, had only missed a critical step of reasoning that many of us on the board of SPME have already made, even if reluctantly and with much regret.
The missing piece here lies in the culture that produced this deed. Anyone who doubts that Palestinian culture, both "secular" (i.e., Fatah, Palestinian Authority) and religious (Hamas, Jihad Islami) has terrifying genocidal tendencies must visit the site of Palestinian Media Watch. There one finds documented in every aspect of public culture, from sermons on TV and educational programs to crosswords, sports, and children's programs, a culture steeped in genocidal hatreds...
This is the evil that the mainstream -- advocacy groups, media, government, non-government -- refuse to face, because the implications are too grave and difficult, as Landes addresses in the piece. It's one of the important questions of our times.
Click to share this post
ma.gnolia | Reddit | Newsvine | Furl | Google
Spurl | Yahoo | Blink List | Connotea | Feed Me
Simpy | Linkroll | Blogmarks | Sphere | Technorati
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Mercaz Harav Massacre a Genocide?.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/14381
1 Comment
Leave a comment to: Mercaz Harav Massacre a Genocide?
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
"This is the evil that the mainstream -- advocacy groups, media, government, non-government -- refuse to face, because the implications are too grave and difficult,"
Well, it stands in contrast to the sentimental fallacy which people like to believe, described by Bertrand Russell as "The Superior Virtue of the Oppressed". People feel extreme, exclusive pity for those they deem "oppressed" and like to attribute their choice of pity to their moral discernment by bestowing upon the object of their pity some sainthood.
In the case of the massive support for Palestinians, there is simply an adamant refusal to understand what's really going on; the genocidal will is firmly and doggedly located in the side they see as "oppressed". This simple and easily verifiable factor is pooh-poohed away as a legitimate response to oppression.
The questions that they need to ask is in what way are the Palestinians oppressed, or are they indeed oppressed, with 400 million Arabs and 1.4 billion Muslims behind them, which fully and unswervingly legitimize Palestinian aspirations to annihilate Israel and her 5.5 million Jews?