Thursday, October 25, 2007

Last night I attended Daniel Pipes' lecture at Tufts University. The speech was billed as being part of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, and given the reception Nonie Darwish got at Berkley, and the fact that Daniel Pipes is a favorite whipping-boy of the campus left, in spite of the fact that it was Game 1 of the World Series last night I figured it would have been blogger malpractice not to check it out. (I brought radio headphones.)

The portents fortold of exciting events. These posters, exhorting the villagers to come drive out the heretic, were plastered liberally across the campus:

[Update: I have received a note from the Tufts Democrats stating that their endorsement appeared on the above poster (only the above) without permission.]

I got to the venue early, and things were quiet...perhaps too quiet...with only a few suited security folks milling about. There were a couple of students handing out copies of the conservative student magazine, The Primary Source (they were the event's sponsors), as well as a small group of folks handing out the evening's protest flier as people entered:

Take a good look at that paper. It was the must-have accessory of the evening. Note particularly the list of sponsors. Yes, the local Hillel was one of the sponsors of the protest. Just when I thought there wouldn't be anyone showing up, people started to arrive en masse around 10 or 15 minutes before the start. A crowd started to form on the sidewalk, many of them holding the above sign, some of whom had brought their own. Here are some pictures, with thanks to some other folks in attendance for providing some of them:

Tufts Chaplain David M. O'Leary made his own.

March of the alter-kacker pinkos.

Defending Tufts from Racism with Paper Swords (poetic).

It was a well-behaved crowd. No chanting, no shoving, no blocking the entrance. Though there were a lot of people there, they behaved more like it was a meeting, rather than a serious protest.

Security was tight. No bags were allowed:

I overheard one student ask the group he was standing with, "So whose lead are we following?" I didn't catch the answer but figured we'd be treated to some organized disruptions.

History Professor Gary Leupp and friends make sure that everyone is armed, inoculated against the threat of the Pipes virus.

I'm happy to say I was wrong about the disruptions. The audience, for the most part, was well-behaved. Though the event was well attended, and I'd say it looked about 90% hostile, there were few disruptions. Someone behind me was shouting out some (he thought) clever thing from time to time, and there was a little bit of holding up the posters and shaking them, the Tufts community showed it was far more capable of holding a contentious event than their California cousins. When Pipes came on stage, much of the crowd held up their signs...

...there was a smattering of boos, but the applause was most prominent, even if much of it amounted to a golf clap. Incorrect University was there, and has posted video of the entirety of Pipes's speech with more to come.

Pipes has a careful, quiet, non-bombastic approach. He has an academic demeanor, and when he began by stating his disagreement with the name "Islamo-Fascism" and continued on to discuss his points of view, the signs slowly began to come down. During the Q&A, no one bogarted the microphone, even though a few of the questioners were obviously not there to ask questions so much as to make points. Pipes fielded them all and took time (sometimes too much time) in answering each in the same dispassionate manner. He only brushed off one question that didn't merit a response (something about George Bush, the Iraq invasion and "Christianists") and he got a little annoyed with one questioner who mischaracterized Campus Watch.

I'll swap this out for a better pic if I get one. These girls came in late, and during the Q&A the one in the brown hijab kept repeating "You'll never defeat us," or "You'll never defeat them," when Pipes was talking about beating the militant Islamists.

I got the feeling -- no surprise here -- that most of the students had no real clue who Daniel Pipes was or what this issue was about. They were indoctrinated with a few selected quotes and instructed in what to think about them, Pipes, and the issue of "Islamo-Fascism." I overheard one student behind me say, "Well, some groups I'm affiliated with signed on to this poster, so I suppose I should hold it up." I doubt he held it up long.

I think that once Pipes started speaking, and the students actually got to hear from him directly, he may have reached a few and opened some minds. I hope so. The students, who, after all, were manipulated into thinking they were there to "fight hate," may now know there's more to the story. The only real villains are the student, and more particularly and seriously the faculty leaders who attempted to close off students' minds, lied to them, manipulated them and propagandized them away from full consideration of what may be one of the most important issues of our time.

What's interesting to an outsider, and I was discussing this with several others after the event, was how closed off and insular the campus culture so obviously is. You can read about it, but actually seeing it in action really sends the message of how tough it is to dissent from the leftist group-think that rules with an iron fist from administration to faculty down to the student organizations. These people really have no idea how "off" and without a clue they look to the outside world...and in the face of the outside world. Some of these "leaders" act as though they live on an ashram doing meditation and sending out peace and love vibes and hoping that will be enough to prepare students and heal the world. It's not. Let me help you out here. You are going to have to face the Daniel Pipes' of the world, and more importantly, his ideas and the things he's trying to reach you substance. Anything less is academic malpractice.

A hearty well-done to the students who organized the main event and to Daniel Pipes for another well-handled appearance.

[I will update this post later if I come across any of my own video that's worth posting, or if I find any photos worth putting up or description of events I may have left out.]

Update: The Tufts Daily has a good article on the event: Pipes speaks to Cohen crowd about radical Islam; students express concern

Update2: I missed these earlier posts at Incorrect U:
Welcome To Tufts
Pipes Doesn’t like the term Islamofascism
Dissent On Tufts Campus

Update3: More on one of the groups that signed on to the protest: Federal Grant Helped Fund Tufts Protest

Update 4: Shortly after posting I received a note from a spokesman for the Tufts Democrats. I asked permission to post the note, but as it has been several days and I haven't heard anything back I'm going to go ahead and post the note with the person's name removed. My reply is below it:

My name is [x] and I am the Communications Director for the Tufts Democrats. I was recently directed to your blog posting entitled "Life in the Terrarium: Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week at Tufts with Daniel Pipes" by an alumnus of our organization.

Reading your post, I'd like to, if I could, share some concerns about the accuracy of certain aspects of it.

First of all, with regard to the image of the flier you have posted online reading "Why Should Tufts Invite this Man to Speak?", I would like to report that the name of our organization appears on that flier in error. If you could explain this somewhere on your blog entry, that would be greatly appreciated. The Tufts Democrats Executive Board was disappointed to learn that our name was included on this flier, specifically because we were asked to sign on to it and explicitly declined. We deeply regret that our ostensive endorsement of this flier may have lent credence to the idea - further promulgated by your entry here - that the Tufts campus predominately attended this lecture with strongly-held preconceived opposition to what Dr. Pipes would say.

As a Tufts student, I can say I strongly doubt this was the case. My peers and myself show a strong penchant for political awareness, activism and independent thought. I would be extremely surprised to learn if very many of them attended this lecture with plans to disregard everything the speaker would say. In fact, such a planned approach would have completely undermined the purpose of attending. (If not to listen, the only other possible purpose for attending this event would have been to disrupt it, and as you reported, disruptions did not occur.) Also, students are in the middle of midterms, and I'd be very surprised if many of them stopped what they were doing to attend something they weren't going to get anything out of.

I can also unconditionally assure you that Dr. Pipes is not, as you say, "a favorite whipping-boy of the campus left". I would submit that additional research into this claim would reveal to you that our campus rarely, if ever has "whipping-boys" of any sort. The use of ad hominem attacks to promote a point of view is largely both irresponsible and unconvincing, and a review of The Tufts Daily's Archives would reveal that political discourse on campus is almost exclusively comprised of debates over issues and ideology - not scarcely-known (at a liberal institution, at least) political thinkers and scholars. Debate about individuals only occurs with regard to public figures, and is justifiably (and appropriately) engaged in by both sides of the political spectrum at Tufts. In particular to Dr. Pipes, as an elected leader of - and active member in - the so-called campus left, I can honestly say I have never heard his name in my life before this week.

Furthermore, even after his name consumed the consciousness of the politicos on our campus due to his impending arrival, there was in no way sufficient criticism of him - there wasn't much criticism of him at all - to justify his being called "a favorite whipping-boy". In fact, the Tufts Democrats, as the largest organization comprising what you call the "campus left", instead opted to replace its meeting this week with an entertaining mock presidential primary debate (very successful by the way). We didn't discuss - nevermind bash - Pipes at all, either at our event, or in any other campus-wide communication. Even if we had held a meeting, his name likely still would not have come up as we were not planning any programming surrounding his speech.

The one flyer we did sign on to (though this sadly also isn't reflected in what is actually printed on the flier) is the one that says "This is a hate-free campus". We endorsed this flyer because we disagree with a major premise of the Primay Source's (and Dr. Pipes') position on the issue of Islamic fundamentalism. In particular, we as Democrats, oppose ascribing those severely misguided actions and philosophies associated with Islamic fundamentalism to people by virtue of their Muslim religion or Middle-Eastern nationality. We further oppose holding the vastly moral Muslim community somehow responsible for the indefensible actions of an entirely separate group of people that engages in wanton acts of violence against innocent people. In a controversy surrounding the Primary Source last year, in one issue it printed a piece which cited several flawed examples to express the conclusion that the Koran intrinsically endorsed the types of unjustified acts of violence perpetrated in Islamic fundamentalism. The piece - among other things - attempted to place the onus on "peaceful Muslim[s]" to "explain or justify this astonishingly intolerant and inhuman behavior". (To make matters worse, this was made to come across in such a way as to convey skepticism that such peaceful Muslims can, in fact, exist.) Statements like these that spread intolerance for certain religions are irresponsible political debate and do nothing to contribute to the political environment at an inclusive university campus. An impetus therefore exists for other politically active students to speak out against them.

It is additionally relevant to note that this sign did not constitute a protest of the event. If the groups signing onto this flier actually opposed Dr. Pipes' lecture, they would have also signed onto the other poster that said as much. They didn't. The "hate-free campus" flyer was distributed outside Cohen Auditorium prior to the event (very few people knew it was to be distributed, and no one came to the event for the purpose of holding up this flyer), and students were explicitly asked to hold up their flyers only at the beginning of the event, so as not to interrupt the lecture. The Tufts Democrats signed on to this knowing this was the plan, and also that it was explicitly to be billed as "a peaceful, silent demonstration". If you factor these flyers out of the equation (considering they didn't actually oppose the lecture and the entirety of their message is something everyone should be able to agree with) I don't think there was a significant enough degree of anti- (or pro-) Pipes demonstration at the event to justify claims about the close-mindedness of the student body. (And even for people who did have signs, if they had done research on Pipes as many of them did, it wouldn't be fair to call them close-minded since they already knew what he was going to say.)

The Tufts Democrats, the other groups signing onto this flier - and the near entirety of campus, it would seem from their lack of disruption - all recognize the right of Dr. Pipes to be heard, and the right of all on-campus organizations to bring speakers to our campus. Furthermore, these students didn't merely peacefully boycott the lecture, as is their right. Instead, they attended it, and not for nefarious purposes. For all your derision of their liberalism, I'd say they deserve a little more credit, not just for behaving like human beings (your surprise at which is frankly somewhat condescending), but for their clear willingness to entertain Pipes' arguments.

Thank you very much for your time in reading this letter.

Here is my reply:

Thank you for your thoughtful note. I regret not having the time to reply in the depth that it probably deserves, but here are a few comments.

First, may I share the note with my readers? I will append it to the posting. I think you have clarified things in your own words better than anyone else could for you, and you may have provided fodder for discussion if anyone wants to take it on. I will place a disclaimer below the photo of the anti-Pipes poster in any case. [Have done so.]

To clarify: I am not a Tufts community member, so the term "campus left" should be read generically, not as "Tufts campus left." This usage (and it's a familiar one to readers of blogs like mine) also more often refers to the "far"-left, not campus Democrats (though I'm sure it does apply even to them on some campuses). I'm glad to hear that the Tufts campus doesn't have problems with radicalization like so many other campuses do -- at least not in sufficient numbers to seriously disrupt events. On most campuses, the far left exists in far greater numbers than in regular life (outside the "terrarium").

Pipes is, in fact, a favorite "whipping-boy" of many on the (generic) campus (far) left. His talks are routinely interrupted and protested. I'm sure if you google him up or browse around his own web site for reports of his prior appearances you'll see many examples.

We'll agree to disagree that what happened there was or was not a protest, and that the students maintained completely open minds. To apply the "Hate" label to something in society (and particularly on the campus) is extremely powerful. I used the term "inoculate" in my post for a reason, and I believe that the people handing out those fliers and making sure that everyone had one knew exactly what they were doing and why -- they wanted to cast a shadow over what Pipes would be presenting. They wanted to make sure it was tainted and branded as dangerous and "incorrect" right from the start. They had no place in the hall. You believe it was an appropriate, "silent, peaceful demonstration," I believe it was wrong-headed.

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Life in the Terrarium: Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week at Tufts with Daniel Pipes.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

The Tufts community not only has it all over their Berkley cousins, but they've got Emory beat by a long-shot (and, pace some of the comments, there were probably a lot of trouble-making outsiders there as well). This is really... Read More

Here's another little bit of news my trip to the Tufts campus landed me with last night: I've written before about Jewish and pro-Israel organizations that ignore advocating on behalf of their own mission statements, and I'm sad to report... Read More

Well our friend Hillel Stavis has been busy today. He is in attendance at the much-discussed J Street Conference down in Washington, and specifically, he was just in attendance at blogger Richard Silverstein's blogger panel. The panel consists of radic... Read More

Notorious Israel and America hater Norman Finkelstein has an interesting speaking engagement planned for March: Date: March 15, 2011 Place: Cabot Auditorium, Fletcher School, Tufts University Time: 7 PM Sponsors, Tufts SJP, New Initiatives for Middle E... Read More


sorry i couldn't come. thanks for the account. sounds like civility reigned. i couldn't agree more with your comments about academia. it has become a little playground where little minds try hard not to let anything that might challenge their hegemony slip in. the real tragedy here is that in rendering themselves worthless or worse, academics -- esp in middle eastern studies -- have done us a terrible disservice. it's their job to lead us in tackling these issues, and instead it's like a 1960s never-never land of failed radicals who never grew up.

Wow! I found myself agreeing with everything he said. I've heard him on the internet before, and liked what his ideas well enough. But here he is especially reasonable and intelligent, with no hint of any over-the-top ideology. I noticed that there was no shouting from his opponents in the audience. I guess that what he said was so balanced and reasonable (without being cliche) that he took the wind out of their sails.

Isn't it strange that posters prepared by Tufts protesters proclaim him as a hatemongerer who should never be allowed on campus. Yet many of these same student groups would welcome Norman Finkelstein on campus.

I don't understand what the people of Hillel was thinking when they joined the protest against Pipes. Were they just trying to prove that they were for "peace" and against hating Muslims? Couldn't they have said that they'd protest true anti-Muslim bigots, but that Pipes isn't one of them?

It's so weird how people's reputations are made. Chomsky is perceived as a deep thinker and Pipes is perceived as frothing at the mouth. Nonnie Darwish is portrayed as a "racist," although what that means in her case I really couldn't say. Everyone opposed by the Islamists and the far left seems to be, by definition, a racist. This is really a practice of misusing loaded terms to disarm the opposition.

There was a loud mouth or two in the audience, but not so much to cause any serious trouble. The video probably doesn't show it (I haven't watched), but they should have some more stuff up when they've had a chance to edit. I know they had more than one camera, and they did some interviews as well.

I think Pipes reached some people, and just as importantly, has probably caused some of the students to look askance in the future when some of these faculty try to lead them astray.

I suppose Hillel was just doing a political pose like everyone else.

Among the other protest sponsors: the Jewish chaplains and the Baha'i students.

That the rabbis suffer from the anatomical condition known as cranio-rectal insertion is no surprise. There are lots of delusional fools in the rabbinate, like Boston's own Moshe Waldoks and the Supreme Tikkunista himself, Michael Lerner.

But the Baha'is? Somebody refresh my memory, please. Where is the Baha'i HQ located, and why is it there? Baha'i is an offshoot of the Religion of Peaceâ„¢. How many Baha'i communities or worship centers are there in Arab or Muslim countries? AFAIK, a quad-amp at Walter Reed with no arms and legs can count them all on his fingers and toes. Stockholm Syndrome?

I think it's irresponsible of the diarist to lambaste the "campus left" and attacking the students and faculty leaders for protesting this event without really investigating the situation.

Did you speak to a single Tufts student? How about some members of the "radical" far left community? I'm puzzled how you can be so critical of a group of students or even an institution without truly knowing anything about it.

I am a student at Tufts, and at times I have been characterized as "far left" or even radical. Yet I attended Pipes' lecture with friends of mine from the Tufts Republicans, I listened respectfully, even when I disagreed with some of the (frankly hateful) sentiments Mr. Pipes expressed. Your ignorance is frightening, and I hope you will be more careful in painting groups in such an all-encompassing way in the future

Now you've got me curious. What parts of Pipes' talk did you find "frankly hateful?"

"Syme: It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. You wouldn't have seen the [Newspeak] Dictionary 10th edition, would you Smith? It's that thick. [illustrates thickness with fingers] The 11th Edition will be that [narrows fingers] thick. Winston Smith: So, The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect? Syme: The secret is to move from translation, to direct thought, to automatic response. No need for self-discipline. Language coming from here [the larynx], not from here [the brain]" -1984 (film)


Blogroll Me!

Adam Holland
Agam's Gecko
Amy Ridenour
Armies of Liberation
Astute Blogger
Backseat Blogger
Barry Rubin
Blazing Cat Fur
Boker tov, Boulder
Bosch Fawstin
Breath of the Beast
Challah Hu Akbar
CiF Watch
Cinnamon Stillwell
Classical Values
Combs Spouts Off
Conservative Grapevine
Conservative Oasis Contentions
Contentious Centrist
Cox & Forkum
Creeping Sharia
Dancing with Dogs
Dave Bender
Davids Medienkritik
Dean Esmay
Defending Crusader
Democracy Project
Dreams Into Lightning
Dutchblog Israel
Exit Zero
Ghost of a Flea
GM's Place
The God Blog
Huff-Po Monitor
In Context
Insignificant Thoughts
Iraq the Model
Israel Matzav
Israel Seen
J Street Jive
Jerusalem Diaries
Jerusalem Posts
Jewish State
Kesher Talk
Legal Insurrection
Liberty's Spirit
Marathon Pundit
The Marmot's Hole
Martin Kramer
Matthew K. Tabor
Mere Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin
Mick Hartley
Mind of Mog
My Machberet
My Wide Blue Seas
Never Yet Melted
One Jerusalem
Paula Says
Point of no Return
Political inSecurity
Random Thoughts
Ranting Sandmonkey
Red Planet Cartoons
Right Wing News
Roger L. Simon
Seraphic Secret
Shawarma Mayor
Shining City
Simply Jews
Soccer Dad
A Soldier's Mother
Solomon's House
Something Something
Somewhere on A1A
Stand for Israel
Survival Tips: The Survivalist Blog
Tasty Infidelicacies
Tel Chai Nation
Texican Tattler
Themistocles' Shade
This Ain't Hell
Tikkun Olam
Tom Glennon
Tools of Renewal
Tundra Tabloids
UCC Truths
Vicious Babushka
The View From Here
View From Iran
The World
Yaacov Lozowick
Yid With Lid

:New England Blogs:
Augean Stables
Bloodthirsty Liberal
Boston Maggie
Boston's Patriots
Boulevard Girl
Business of Life
Daniel in Brookline
Hub Blog
Hub Politics
Jules Crittenden
Libertarian Leanings
Maggie's Farm
Miss Kelly
N.E. Republican
People's Republicans
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Sippican Cottage
Squaring the Globe
Universal Hub
Weekend Pundit
Who Knew?

Blogroll Policy

If You Enjoy This Site
Paypal Donate

Amazon Purchase
(Buy yourself something with this link and I will get a percentage.)

My Amazon Wish List

Worth a Click





Solomonia Button

Smaller Button

Smallest Button

Note on Permissions:
You may feel free to use anything you find on this site as long as you're not selling it. Just give credit where credit is due is all. Thanks for stopping by!

Site (C)2003-2009

This site will not display properly at screen resolutions of less than 1024px wide.

Solomonia Store




Martin Solomon

Mary Madigan

Hillel Stavis


Jon Haber
Jon Haber


Opinions expressed are those of the individual. No one speaks for any organization unless expressly stated.

Enter your Email for a Daily Digest of New Posts

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
(Be sure to whitelist if you aren't receiving updates.)

Click here for other subscription options, including Twitter, AIM, MSM and others.

Follow me on Twitter



 Subscribe in a reader


EN 160x600 B

Quality Diamond Crosses