Amazon.com Widgets

April 2005 Archives

Friday, April 29, 2005

Persecuted Christians and Saudi Religious Intolerance

Further on that entry below about the 40 Pakistani Christians arrested in Saudi Arabia in which I asked (rhetorically), "Does the PC(USA) have a position on this?"...(and how about the AUT?) MEMRI has a picture and some details:

...The paper also noted that during the police operation, which lasted nearly 10 hours, a cross and a large number of proselytizing books and cassettes were found [in the apartment]. The detainees themselves stated that they had come to listen to lectures by the minister. One of the detainees was a Muslim Pakistani, who acknowledged that he had been influenced by the Christian ideology...

I hope he didn't convert. He could be killed.

...A Saudi religious police source explained the reason for the arrest: "These people tried to spread the poison and their beliefs to others, by means of distributing pamphlets and [missionary] publications." He said that all the detainees "had been transferred to the relevant bodies for investigation."

Ouch. If there's one thing the Saudis are liberal about - it's applying torture.

Making blogging pay? At least a little?

Roger L. Simon has let the cat out of the bag on a new initiative for bloggers in An Open Letter to All Bloggers. If you have a blog and are interested in carrying a little advertising and maybe making a few bucks someday, you might want to check it out and sign up. Blog advertising is one aspect of the effort, the other is in bringing blog content out to the more general public by forming a "Blog News Service": "...An editorial board consisting of Glenn Reynolds, PowerLine, Lawrence Kudlow, Hugh Hewitt, Marc Cooper, Wretchard of the Belmont Club and Tim Blair, as well as the founders, is already in place with other bloggers in many countries having signed on as contributors..."

So, if you're a blogger, go ahead and check it out and consider signing up by visiting Roger's post above. You might also want to take a look if you're someone who reads blogs or may be interested in investing in the project. See posts here and here for more info.

I can confess now that I've known about this for some weeks. I happened to have had an idea and for whatever reason emailed it over to Roger. It was very much like what they seem to be doing with their editorial board and syndication idea - close enough that Roger emailed me back and told me that it was very similar to something he had in the pipeline, but that I would have to sign a non-disclosure agreement to hear more about it and consider signing on (yes, this is a serious effort). I did sign the NDA, and did sign on to the project. Roger was kind enough to say that he had been meaning to contact me about it - kind enough, I say, because I doubt this little blog would have been a necessary inclusion in their first round of recruiting had I not by coincidence stepped forward at just the right time - just not enough traffic to rank up there (yet!). Still, it's neat to be included, and also fun to be doing something serious enough to require signing and faxing hard copies.

BTW, I know very little more than what you can read in the various blog posts on the subject, so let me save you some questioning. Besides, I couldn't tell you even if I did know! NDA and all, haha.

Anyway, as I said, if interested, go take a look. Personally, while I think rationalizing ad revenue is a nice thing, I can't imagine it would make that much difference for anyone but the big guys. I'm more interested in this opening up an avenue into publishing something in the legacy, or at least the pay, media. That's where I think the interest would likely lie for those of us who's sites aren't into the thousands of hits a day territory.

Edit: BTW, that last paragraph is pure speculation on my part. Remember what I said - that at this point I have very little more information than what's (now) publicly available, so my speculation is little better than anyone else's.

Anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionism and the AUT Boycott


"I see no antisemitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the Holocaust."

- Noam Chomsky

That statement may, possibly, be true in the extreme abstract. The trouble is, we do not live in an abstract world. In the real world, where the rubber hits the road, the evidence for gas chambers and the genocide against the Jews is so overwhelming that is always indicative of an underlying pathology when people who should know better propagate doubt about them.

One could imagine even the most naive student of World War 2 history who embarks on an exploration of the facts behind the Holocaust and comes out something of a doubter getting themselves a quick reality check when they take a second look at the character and quality of the sources they will have been relying on, the stages they will be sharing and with whom they will be sharing them, the use their efforts are put to, the vision of a Google search of their name suddenly representing a hop-scotch game of anti-Semites and outright neo-Nazis...somewhere along the line, somewhere they may have occasion to reexamine, to ask themselves, "How did I get here? It wasn't what I intended..." That intended purely academic pursuit, built on what is on closer examination a worm-ridden foundation, cannot stand.

The stark sunlit world of reality has the ability to utterly melt away the false construct of the purely abstract.

That's how it is with denial of the gas chambers. It might, on some level, sound reasonable that there's nothing absolutely and inherently anti-Semitic in denying their existence, but out here in the real world, there's something about it that makes it most certainly so.

And that's what I've been thinking while reading about the AUT's boycott motion, and so much of the anti-Semitism masquerading as "anti-Zionism" these days. Is it possible to boycott Israeli institutions and not be anti-Semitic?

That said, I commend to you this piece in full which Melanie Phillips excerpted from (I linked it below). Although I have my quibbles with the group Engage, this is a very good essay:

Howard Jacobson on anti-Zionism

Allow me, in the light of the Association of University Teachers decision to boycott Israeli Universities, to voice a heresy. Anti-Zionism is, after all, anti-Semitism.

I say after all because until now I have always resisted the conflation of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. I have suffered very little anti-Semitism personally, and don’t find it under every stone. I don’t think Jews, by virtue of their victimization in the past, have any right to expect exemption from the usual rough and tumble of opinion. And I don’t consider it a mark of ill will towards Israel - indeed it might well denote the very opposite - to oppose its policies when they are inhumane.

It is important to hammer in this nail. No, no, and no again, I do not accuse all those who censure Israel of hating Jews. Which nail hammered, it is equally important to drive in another. In the boycott by the Association of University Teachers what has been expressed is not criticism or censure but vilification. Criticism, the more particularly as university teachers should be expected to understand it, implies the free exchange of judgement and idea, the give and take - however harsh - of argument and counter-argument. Anything less is merely the closing of minds. And a boycott - especially a boycott of thinkers, scientists, philosophers, etc, those for whom open-mindedness should be paramount - is an expression of the closing of minds en masse.

There is some fancy abroad that where large numbers of people agree to close their minds together you have democracy in action. You don’t. What you have is mobilized prejudice...

As I advised, read in full.

In the extended entry, I have provided some links to AUT members resignations (all linked at Norm's place).

Continue reading "Anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionism and the AUT Boycott"

Nazi still to speak to Florida Islamic group

Robert Spencer reports that the Florida Islamic group that invited neo-Nazi William Baker to speak at its function has not cancelled the appearance.

To the disappointment of Jewish leaders, a speech by the former chairman of a neo-Nazi group will go on as planned.

A day after a lawyer representing an Islamic group said William Baker probably would not appear at a gala Saturday night, Mohammad Jawad Al-Qazwini said Wednesday he didn't plan to cancel Baker's speech.

"The decision made on our behalf to bring Mr. Baker was not against the Jewish community," said Al-Qazwini, the imam of the Boca Raton-based Assadiq Islamic Educational Foundation. "He will be strictly speaking about the prophet Mohammed. He will be strictly speaking about the Islamic faith."...

"Now, Mr. Mussolini, if you would only confine your talk to train scheduling, we would be happy to invite you..."*

*[Yes, I am aware that Mussolini did not literally make the trains run on time. :) ]

Thursday, April 28, 2005

Professors Coming Out - (2 Updates)

[Update: Melanie Phillips has some good stuff in a round-up of voices against the boycott, including one very fine reponse to the anti-Boycott group "Engage" which, for reasons inexplicable to me, (well, I could explicate them, but you get the point) is drawing much positive feedback from other anti-Boycott voices, while it too bases its stand on a flawed politic.]

More reaction to the AUT boycott. Some strong words from Robert A. Moss of Rutgers (circulated via email):

"I WILL GO TO EDINBURGH"

Robert Moss

Here is my response to AUT. I am slated to speak at a symposium at the University of Edinburgh in August. I will take a few moments at the beginning of my presentation to deplore the boycott from the lectern.

"As a chair professor at a major U.S. University, and as a member of the American Association of University Professors, I wish to express my outrage at the one-sided, anti-Israel and anti-Semitic resolution adopted (without debate) by the AUT..

"I will henceforth refuse to review scientific papers originating in the U.K., and will recommend that my colleagues take a similar stance. It is of course unfair to penalize all British academics for the stupidity of some of their colleagues, but until those who claim to speak for them come to their senses (not to say reclaim their integrity) and rescind this racist resolution, I feel that I have no other way to effectively express my protest."

Also, many of you have probably already seen this letter from Emanuele Ottolenghi of St Anthony's College, Oxford to the AUT:

Regarding the AUT recent decision to boycott Haifa University and Bar Ilan University in Israel, I am shocked to learn that, in addition to a call for boycott, the AUT is ready to offer a waiver to scholars on condition that they publicly state their willingness to conform to the political orthodoxy espoused by the academics who sponsored your motion.

Oaths of political loyalty do not belong to academia. They belong to illiberal minds and repressive regimes. Based on this, the AUT's definition of academic freedom is the freedom to agree with its views only. Given the circumstances, I wish to express in no uncertain terms my unconditional and undivided solidarity with both universities and their faculties. I know many people, both at Haifa University and at Bar Ilan University, of different political persuasion and from different walks of life. The diversity of those faculties reflects the authentic spirit of academia. The AUT invitation to boycott them betrays that spirit because it advocates a uniformity of views, under pain of boycott.

In solidarity with my colleagues and as a symbolic gesture to defend the spirit of a free academia, I wish to be added to the boycott blacklist. Please include me. I hope that other colleagues of all political persuasions will join me.

Finally (for now), see this piece published in Canada's National Post which is behind subscription there but was forwarded to me in email so I'll include it in full here in the extended entry:

Cover for a deeper prejudice by Ed Morgan

This week Britain's umbrella academics' union, the Association of University Teachers (AUT) voted to boycott two Israeli universities. It seems that while British physicians still take the Hippocratic oath, doctors in other fields are taking a hypocritical one. As Alan Dershowitz notes elsewhere on this page, the campaign resurrected a more limited version of a motion that failed at the AUT two years ago, which called for a boycott of all Israeli institutions.

Last spring I began a sabbatical year from the University of Toronto, where I teach international law and Canadian constitutional law, by teaching at Haifa University -- one of the two targeted institutions. I can say first hand that the reasons for the boycott seem so off-base it is hard to believe that they are anything but camouflage for a deeper prejudice. Indeed, the moving force behind the AUT motion, Birmingham University lecturer Sue Blackwell, gave away the poorly kept secret when she explained that Israelis, being, well, Israeli, simply "cannot expect to be treated as normal citizens from a normal state." Articulating a falsehood that would astonish anyone who has ever had the bruising experience of arguing a position -- any position -- in an Israeli institution, she declared that, "You cannot talk about academic freedom and free debate in Israel in the same way you can talk about it in the U.K."...


Continue reading "Professors Coming Out - (2 Updates)"

Manufacturing Consent in Gaza

Violence and corruption in the Palestinian Police and Press! Who'da thunk it? Someone call Noam Chomsky!

JPost: Palestinian scribes boycott Abbas

Palestinian journalists on Wednesday refused to cover a visit by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas to the Civil Police headquarters in Gaza City after some of them were beaten by security officers...

...The journalists were invited to cover Abbas's morning visit to the police headquarters, known as the Yasser Arafat Police Compound. They complained that while they were waiting for Abbas to arrive, some policemen started pushing them in a violent manner and cursing them.

In response, the journalists left the compound, announcing that they would boycott coverage of events related to Abbas's activities. The journalists also refused to cover the weekly meeting of the PA cabinet, which was held in Gaza City.

"The policemen beat us for no reason," a local photographer told The Jerusalem Post. "That's why we left the area. This is not the first time that the police have attacked journalists in the Gaza Strip."...

...Earlier this month, Palestinian journalists called for an end to PA control of the media and threatened to go on strike unless their demand was met. They also demanded that journalists working for the PA-funded media be given higher salaries and better conditions...

...In another development, Abbas issued a decree on Tuesday placing the PA's radio and television station under the jurisdiction of the PA Ministry of Information. The stations and other PA-funded media have been under the direct control of the PLO Executive Committee.

Abbas also decided to unite the Voice of Palestine radio station and Palestine TV under one body called The Palestinian Radio and TV Corporation, which will be under the direct control of Information Minister Nabil Shaath.

Shaath revealed on Wednesday that many Palestinian journalists and media outlets had been on the PA's payroll for years. He said the payments were made on the instructions of Yasser Arafat.

He told Palestinian legislators that several newspapers and magazines published in Jerusalem had been receiving funds from the PA. They include the newspapers al-Quds, al-Manar, al-Shaab, Falasteen, and three magazines: al-Awdah magazine, al-Bayader al-Siyassi and She'er.

Some of the publications were continuing to receive funds although they stopped appearing many years ago...

Now that's what I call a good writing gig. I can think of a few "writers" that deserve to be paid not to practice.

'Statewide Academic Union Calls for University of Wisconsin Israel Divestment' - and an early start on this year's PSM Conference

Pre-Background:

Keep the following image in mind as you read the rest of this entry. It's a picture of an item typical of those on sale at a recent Al-Awda Convention at UCLA. This image is a good sum-up of the essence of one of the groups behind this divestment effort:

Al Awda is one of the main groups responsible for what you'll read below - and keep that image in mind the next time someone from one of these groups claims they stand for "Peace" and "Justice."

Most of the following is quoted from the latest JAT-Action alert.

A press release from "The University of Wisconsin Divestment from Israel Campaign":

Statewide Academic Union Calls for University of Wisconsin Israel Divestment

(Madison, WI- 04/27/05) – The Association of University of Wisconsin Professionals (TAUWP) has adopted a resolution that calls on the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents to divest from companies that provide the Israeli Army with weapons, equipment, and supporting systems. TAUWP is a statewide local of the American Federation of Teachers-Wisconsin representing faculty and academic staff from 25 University of Wisconsin campuses. The resolution was passed at the TAUWP delegate assembly on April 23rd by a vote of 24 to 2, with four abstentions.

Citing the precedent set by the University of Wisconsin’s elimination of investments in apartheid era South Africa, the resolution urged divestment from Boeing, Caterpillar, General Dynamics, General Electric, Lockheed Martin, Northrop-Grumman, and Raytheon ‘based on evidence of the active role these companies play in enabling Israeli forces to engage in practices that violate international law and the human rights of the Palestinian people.’ The University of Wisconsin Trust Fund’s investments in the companies specified by the resolution exceed $3.8 Million.

The resolution is part of The University of Wisconsin Divest from Israel Campaign, a project led by Al-Awda Wisconsin (The Palestine Right to Return Coalition) and Alternative Palestinian Agenda in partnership with several local social justice, student, and community organizations. The campaign gained significant momentum when the Faculty Senate of the University of Wisconsin-Platteville passed a similar resolution at it’s regular meeting on January 25th 2005. The UW-Platteville senate became the first University faculty body in the United States to adopt a resolution calling for divestment from companies providing material aid to Israel. A similar resolution was adopted by the Teaching Assistant Association and called on the Board of Regents to divest from weapon manufacturers...

Like the British Academic Boycott, the Wisconsin vote seems to have been timed to coincide with Passover in order to minimize the number of Jewish members present.

[Much, much more in the extended entry.]

Continue reading "'Statewide Academic Union Calls for University of Wisconsin Israel Divestment' - and an early start on this year's PSM Conference"

Turning up artifacts in the garden...

CNN: Gardener unearths Bronze Age tools, weapons

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- A man landscaping his garden in eastern England has unearthed a major hoard of tools and weapons dating back nearly 3,000 years, an archaeologist revealed on Tuesday.

The hoard is among the largest finds in Britain from the late Bronze Age, consisting of 145 items including spear and axe heads, swords and metal working tools.

"This is one of the biggest late Bronze Age hoards ever found in Norfolk and is up there among the major finds in Britain," said Alan West, curator of archaeology at Norwich Museum some 100 miles northeast of London.

"The items are in good condition and this find is another significant piece in the Bronze Age jigsaw adding to our knowledge of the period," he told Reuters.

Included among the items is a Viking brooch, and West said it was unusual to find buried items together dating from different periods...


Wednesday, April 27, 2005

Another Presbyterian "Education" Event

Presbyterians, do you know what your church is saying on your behalf? The PC(USA) had panel discussion last night at Harvard. Not surprisingly, there were no dissenting voices on the stage, and little dissent allowed from the audience - something I can't say I blame the organizers for. Perhaps it's time for dissident Presbyterians to start organizing their own events?

The panelists were: Reverend Fahed Abu-Akel, the moderator of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the Ecumenical Canon of the Cathedral of St.George the Martyr in East Jerusalem, Palestine, and Reverend Patricia Budd Kepler and Reverend Thomas F. Kepler of the Boston Presbytery.

The Crimson: Israel Divestment Debate Reignited

Three representatives from the Presbyterian Church USA, which has announced plans to cut ties to firms that support Israeli soldiers and settlers on the West Bank and Gaza, outlined their denomination’s controversial divestment policy before a crowd of 70 students and community members in Emerson Hall last night.

The panel resurrected the dormant campus debate over Israeli divestment, which flared in 2002 when 75 Harvard faculty members signed a petition calling on the University to sell its $600 million stake in companies that have significant operations in the Jewish state.

The same year, a counter-divestment drive garnered signatures from 439 Harvard faculty members, who objected that Israel had been singled out for criticism.

While all three speakers yesterday supported the Presbyterian Church’s decision to divest, Rami R. Sarafa ’07, president of the Society of Arab Students (SAS), said that “at this time, we and our co-sponsoring organizations are not promoting divestment but are promoting discussion and debate about it.” The International Relations Council, the Palestinian Solidarity Committee, and the Woodbridge Society of International Students joined SAS to co-sponsor the event along with several graduate school and alumni groups...

Last year I wrote about attending my parents' temple Passover Seder - a big event I thought might be fun to bring the family to and have some sort of Jewish experience together. It's a large, liberal, Reform synagogue, and the service reflected it. Very informal, and the big political issue of the service (Passover Seders are very customizable events, I guess. There are many versions of the "Hagadah," or Passover prayer book - feminist versions, child's versions, that kind of thing...) was the issue of the day a year ago - Gay Marriage, complete with flyers to fill in and send to your reps supporting same-sex unions... [continued in the extended entry]

Continue reading "Another Presbyterian "Education" Event"

"Thank you for protecting us from the bad man..."

..says this article in the DePaul student newspaper. Spinning hard and fast that it was Klocek's behavior, not his ideology that caused his troubles (in spite of the fact that the immediate complaints of the students involved and the Dean in charge talked ideology, not behavior) this student-written editorial aggressively toes the administration's party line. Goodbye, Klocek. Thanks, DPU [Marathon Pundit also comments on this piece.]

DePaul would have a lot more credibility if they allowed Klocek to have a say in his own words, or at least interviewed him to get his side of things, rather than continuing to report on only one side of the issue.

BTW, just in case you missed it, this article at the American Thinker does an excellent job of drawing the connection between what happened to Klocek and the ideological atmoshpere at DePaul: DePaul’s Jihad against academic freedom

Roadblock Watch

Haaretz: Two Palestinian youths carrying explosives arrested at Jenin roadblock

Israel Defense Forces soldiers arrested two Palestinian teenagers at the Jalameh roadblock in the West Bank city of Jenin on Wednesday morning, after they were found to be in possession of explosives and weapons, Israel Radio reported.

According to the report, the two - aged 15 and 16 years - told interrogators that they had been acting as couriers for terrorists.

The radio said that the two have apparently entered northern Israel from the Jenin area on several previous occasions, each time carrying several packages.

One of the teens, Hammam Daraghmeh, said he was a member of the Islamic Jihad militant group and is ready to die. "I wanted to destroy Israel," he said.

His partner, Mohammed Nasser Daraghmeh, said he had been recruited by another militant group, the Fatah-linked Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, and asked to carry a bag with a bomb to the checkpoint. The teens said they are distant relatives.

In recent years, militant groups have increasingly turned to teenagers and women to help carry out attacks, believing that they are less likely to draw attention from IDF troops...


About those rockets...

...we saw photos of below. What are on parade one day have a tendency to land in someone's backyard tomorrow.

Haaretz: Abbas: Qassam fire a rogue act; must be stopped by all means

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas condemned Tuesday evenning[sic] the firing of two Qassam rockets at Sderot by Palestinian militants earlier that evening.

Speaking to reporters in Gaza Abbas disassociated the Palestinian mainstream from the attack and called on those behind it to desist...

Update: Also see here: MK tells Gaza rally: Time for civil disobedience

...Meanwhile, Palestinian gunners fired a Qassam rocket that landed a few dozen meters from an anti-disengagement march in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday, lightly wounding a soldier hit by shrapnel.

The rocket struck as the march filed past the Mouassi, the Palestinian area in the heart of Gush Katif. Minutes later, a mortar shell landed in the central settlement of Neve Dekalim, exploding without injury. A second rocket and two other mortar shells hit Gaza later in the day, causing no casualties...


Don't get on the Boston Globe's bad side

Or they'll smear you like they're smearing Harvard President Lawrence Summers in this piece on AIDS funding. How do I know it's a smear? Start with the fact that if they didn't have it in for Summers on a personal level then this "news" item would be focused on "Harvard University" decisions - it wouldn't be harping on the name Lawrence Summers over and over. It wouldn't be quoting physicians stating the obvious - that every minute, people are dying of AIDS. We all know that, but of course people also die from money unwisely spent. I know it's a smear because by the end of the article I learn nothing other than being left with the sneaking suspicion that they have it in for Summers. They might have done a little research and explain some of the issues the university is concerned with and giving us as balanced a view as possible to allow we, the readers, to come to some sort of educated conclusion. But they don't, because that's not their purpose.

The Boston Globe: Legal concerns delayed Harvard AIDS funding By John Donnelly

PRETORIA -- Harvard University president Lawrence H. Summers delayed the spending of millions of dollars to treat dying AIDS patients in Africa for five months last year, because he worried that the program was hastily crafted and could be a legal risk to the school, a senior Harvard official said.

In Nigeria, where AIDS treatment programs run by Harvard were put on hold, doctors said last week that Harvard's delay meant that some patients died. They criticized Harvard's leaders for not acting more quickly...


Bernard-Henri Lévy on America

David Brooks interviews French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy on his upcoming series in The Atlantic wherein he follows in Toqueville's footsteps, travels about the United States and reports back on his findings in a four-part series for the magazine. Sadly, the interview is available only to subscribers, but here are a couple of tastes from what was forwarded to me:

America in Foreign Eyes - Bernard-Henri Lévy speaks with David Brooks about Americaits patriotism, its religion, its ideology

Levy on the role of religion in America, explaining Red to Blue and saying, "Stop being so afraid, this is your strength:"

...Another difference. I come from a country where religion, the faith, the creed in God, is a declining attitude. Old churches are in a deep crisis. But I landed in a country last year where you cannot find one American lady or gentlemansaying that he doesn't believe in God. Tocqueville had seen that already. This is a big part of his observation. He stressed the paradox of this being the only nation in the world where freedom and faith did not go in two separate roads. In France, liberty has had to be gained over religion. The less religion we have in France, the more liberty we have. In America, Tocqueville said, it is contrarythe two nourish and feed each other...

And he is honest, too, and shares some of the ground - some of my concerns - where I too part company from some of my "conservative" fellows:

...So, of what am I afraid? Of what should you be afraid? I would not dare to say. You know yourself. But myself there are a few things which I love and a few which frighten me. For instance, coming back to the topic of religion. One day I was in a helicopter going above the Grand Canyon. The pilot was a young boy, quite up-to-date, modern, liking new music, dating with a beautiful girl, andI'm completely suresecular in his mind. A modern, young, American boy. And I asked him "What about this huge, magnificent landscape that we see under our feet?" The canyon. And he said to me, "There are two theories." I felt aie, aie, aie, as we say in French, Problems begin! "First theory," he said, "during millions of years, the erosion of the water," and so on and so on. "Second theory," he said, "six thousand years ago there was a big flood which took place exactly here. And this is the place of the creation of the world." I said, "What do you mean?" He said, "Yes, there was a second theory which said the world was created six thousand years ago, in six days, and in this very place." We spoke when we landed, and he told me that he frankly did not know if Darwin was a scientist or a crook. That he frankly did not know if the birth of the universe was an immemorial event or a historic event like in the Bible. And I felt that is the thing of which, if I was American, I would be afraid.

Today, they say, there is a Darwinist science and there is a creationist science. What the young pilot of my helicopter meant, by saying there are two theories, was exactly that. This is very serious, because if both of them are scientific then you give to creationism the title of legitimacy. This is a phenomenon which we don't have in France. It might be a little example, but it tells a lot of the dark side of the future of America...

If you can read it all, read it. I'll probably look for it at the news stand.

Thomas Sowell: 'Crippled by Their Culture'

Interesting piece in today's Opinion Journal by Thomas Sowell on culture as a bigger roadblock to success than race. It's less often the color of one's skin, and more often the character of one's culture that serves as an indicator of future success:

Crippled by Their Culture - Race doesn't hold back America's "black rednecks." Nor does racism.

For most of the history of this country, differences between the black and the white population--whether in income, IQ, crime rates, or whatever--have been attributed to either race or racism. For much of the first half of the 20th century, these differences were attributed to race--that is, to an assumption that blacks just did not have it in their genes to do as well as white people. The tide began to turn in the second half of the 20th century, when the assumption developed that black-white differences were due to racism on the part of whites.

Three decades of my own research lead me to believe that neither of those explanations will stand up under scrutiny of the facts. As one small example, a study published last year indicated that most of the black alumni of Harvard were from either the West Indies or Africa, or were the children of West Indian or African immigrants. These people are the same race as American blacks, who greatly outnumber either or both.

If this disparity is not due to race, it is equally hard to explain by racism. To a racist, one black is pretty much the same as another. But, even if a racist somehow let his racism stop at the water's edge, how could he tell which student was the son or daughter of someone born in the West Indies or in Africa, especially since their American-born offspring probably do not even have a foreign accent?

What then could explain such large disparities in demographic "representation" among these three groups of blacks? Perhaps they have different patterns of behavior and different cultures and values behind their behavior...


Sox Game

I took my four year old to her first game inside Fenway Park last night. She's been to Fenway once before, but we never went inside. This time I had one pretty good loge seat (box 146) and decided to take my girl in. I was a little worried they'd hassle me to get her a ticket which I was willing to do ($20 for a standing room ticket), but there was no trouble at all. They probably figure any child small enough to be carried in can come on.

They've done a nice job changing the atmosphere around the park and making it fun to hang out there - a band, a man on stilts, balloon animals, Wally the Green Monster (who my daughter is simultaneously terrified of and fascinated with). I always arrive early and park on Bay State Road. Thank you, BTW, to whoever put a fake orange "SUV Driver" ticket on my windshield with such helpful fun "facts" as "If everyone driving an SUV drove a car instead, we could completely end our use of Middle Eastern oil." (One wonders what the excuse was before SUV's.) I tore it into little strips and sprinkled the pieces along the banks of the Charles River in your name.

It was a long game, and we only stayed until about the fourth inning, which was about 9PM and late enough for a four year old. Food eaten included: 2 Fenway Franks, 1 bag popcorn, 1 order nachos, lots of water.

So then I get home and I'm hanging out here getting caught up on some email...when I hear a sort of scratching sound in the kitchen. I think, "OK, mouse...I'll get you..." But no, I come out of my office and this guy almost flies into my face:

Yeah, a freakin' bat. As you may remember, I did discover a gaggle of bats in my attic some time ago, but I've been checking for them and haven't seen them since then. I have no idea where this guy came from, or how he got into the main part of the house. Long story short, I chased him around the house, ducking and jiving, with a cardboard box to try to catch him. Finally he disappeared, although I think I know where he is...he's tonight's project.

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Bet you didn't see these pictures at the BBC

Charles points to this Getty Images gallery of photos of Hamas during the recent Palestinian elections. Aside from the noticable fact that the Hamas candidates' faces would break if any of them cracked a smile, I also find images like this notable:

Notable for the fact that commonplace images like this utterly demolish the idea of Israel as the sort of monstrous terror state, portrayed on sites like Electronic Intifada as keeping the Palestinian Arabs living in a state of constant fear, ducking Israeli bullets and having their lungs wrecked by tear-gas. In spite of the fact that Israel has complete conventional military control of the area, and these rockets are designed for no other purpose than to kill Israeli civilians (Jew or Gentile, BTW - they don't discriminate), the Israeli military machine sits and does nothing.

Of course, the killers of Hamas know to keep children in close-proximity at all times. They know their opponent's humanity and sense of responsibility in the world community (/spit) - even as they have none and feel none.

Oh, and file this one and others like it in your "Palestinian child abuse" folder:


Monday, April 25, 2005

Watching the Boycott

In this lengthy piece at the Jerusalem Post we learn that:

...Al-Quds University in eastern Jerusalem came out against the academic boycott of Israel.

"We are informed by the principle that we should seek to win Israelis over to our side, not to win against them," said the university, which is headed by Dr. Sari Nusseibeh.

"Therefore...we believe it is in our interest to build bridges, not walls; to reach out to the Israeli academic institutions, not to impose another restriction or dialogue-block on ourselves."...

Then there's this: "Plans to launch an international boycott of the union are currently being discussed by Jewish academics in Britain."

I'd like to know what those are. I really would.

I also suggest reading this piece about the leftist academic, Ilan Pappe, who's letter to the AUT was a major source of ammunition and inspiration for the forces of darkness in this case.

This is the persecuted University Professor Complex writ large and brought to its ultimately self-defeating conclusion. Even Benny Morris (hardly a right-winger himself) is...noncomplimentary of Pappe.

JPost: Haifa U won't fire Pappe for backing ban

...University of Haifa president Aaron Ben-Ze'ev told the Post that he finds Pappe's moral stance "gravely disturbing."

"I think that a person who calls to boycott his university should join the boycott and resign immediately from the university," Ben-Ze'ev said. "It is difficult to describe a greater moral injury to academic freedom than the behavior of someone who has been bullying his colleagues and calling to boycott them. It is bizarre that he has chosen to attack the very same university that has exercised such a policy of tolerance towards him."

During the past few years, according to members of the university's faculty and administration, the only measure taken against Pappe was a complaint lodged with the internal faculty disciplinary committee, which focused on Pappe's unethical behavior towards his peers and his efforts to disbar them from international forums for contradicting his views. Contrary to Pappe's claim, the university said it had made no attempt to expel him...


Continue reading "Watching the Boycott"

The Jews are out to get us!

Massad and Ali at Columbia:

Joseph Massad: The Israelis are out to get me!

Tariq Ali: No, the Israelis are out to get all of us!

Columbia's Anti-Jewish Conspiracy Theorist

...Academic freedom for Massad is being able to freedom to teach without challenge that “Established scholarship enumerates all [Israel's] racist flaws and institutional racist practices” which he says render the Jewish state “a racist state by law.” But any disagreement, Massad says, can be safely discarded as Zionist ideology, part of the conspiracy “propped up by the likes of Campus-Watch, the David Project, and the ADL [Anti-Defamation League],” who “make it...their business to attack scholarly criticisms of Israeli policy.” Failing to discard studies by “Israel's apologists” amounts to “shutting down the educational process in favor of religious theories of creationism.” Evidently America can learn from Palestinian society’s principled anti-racism and passion for historical truth.

Tariq Ali then spoke and took the conspiracy mania fully over the edge. He sees “what is taking place on the campuses as part of the larger and wider project which was initiated by the Sharon government, soon before they went into Jenin [in March 2002] in the big attempt to crush the intifada.” The decision to persecute the poor academics “was made in Israel,” then “circulated” to Israeli embassies, which somehow made it happen worldwide. The Elders of Zion must be working overtime...

Yikes, you'd never know that most of the pro-Israel activists I hear speak think the Israeli Government does a crap job of PR for itself (and I pretty much agree). Maybe Joseph Massad would be less open to criticism if his scholarship were...better. Here's Massad on modern anti-Semitism. No prize for guessing who he believes its real modern victims are: Semites and anti-Semites, that is the question Hanging around and doing panels with political lunatics like Tariq Ali probably doesn't help, either.

Why there are checkpoints, Part 12,354...

Haaretz: IDF troops arrest Palestinian youth carrying four pipe bombs

Israel Defense Forces troops at a West Bank checkpoint arrested a Palestinian youth carrying four pipe bombs on Friday.

The youth, 17, who was passing through the Beit Farik checkpoint refused to let soldiers open his bag. The soldiers insisted on checking its contents, and found the four explosives, which were ready for use.

Sappers safely detonated the bombs. The youth was arrested and transferred to the Shin Bet security service for questioning...

...According to the IDF, in the past month, Palestinians have tried eight times to smuggle weapons or explosives through checkpoints in the Nablus region.

It was released for publication on Friday that IDF troops arrested wanted Islamic Jihad militant Jilad Duman at a roadblock northwest of Ramallah on Thursday. According to the IDF, the man had expressed a readiness to carry out a suicide bombing, and was involved in shooting attacks against Israelis.


Saudi Apartheid

Washington Times: Christians detained for illegal praying

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia -- Saudi Arabia has detained 40 Pakistani Christians for holding prayers at a house in the Muslim kingdom, where practicing any religion other than Islam is illegal, newspapers said yesterday.

A group of men, women and children were attending the service in the capital Riyadh when police raided the house, Al Jazirah newspaper said.

It said authorities also found Christian tapes and books.

Another Saudi daily, Al Yaum, said the raid took place on Friday while a Pakistani preacher was delivering a sermon. It was not clear what measures might be taken against the group...

Does the PC(USA) have a position on this? /snark

Saturday, April 23, 2005

JPost: 'Jewish lecturers resign after AUT bans Israeli academics'

More news and reaction on the boycott.

JPost: 'Jewish lecturers resign after AUT bans Israeli academics'

The decision by Britain's 40,000 member Association of University Teachers (AUT) to boycott two Israeli universities on Friday has ignited scathing condemnation from Jewish communities worldwide and has prompted the immediate resignation of Jewish academics from the AUT.

In a blitz procedure timed - on the eve of Passover - to exclude Jewish members from the conference, the AUT rushed through two motions to boycott Haifa and Bar Ilan universities, exhibiting an unprecedented escalation of a campaign by British academics to target Israel.

In her allegations against the Israeli institutions, Ms. Blackwell relied heavily on a letter by Ilan Pappe, lecturer in political science at Haifa University. A message from Dr. Pappe was distributed to every executive member at the conference, in which Pappe called on the conference to adopt a boycott of his own university, and alleged he was the victim of "restriction" and "harassment."

The speeches were met with rapturous applause from the audience, before AUT executive president Angela Roger cut short the session and moved to deny a right of reply to opponents of the motions. The session was then directed towards a vote, and a "lack of time" was cited as the reason preventing challenges to the motions from being heard...

They took a vote after making sure no one could speak in opposition. Very nice. These are people speaking out on behalf of the supposedly oppressed, on behalf of academic freedom and peace. The word "Stalinist" seems not such an exageration.

Some interesting stuff in the moderated comments:

Michael Segal, Boston, USA: The Israeli universities should issue adjunct professorships to a large number of prominent academics who would then inform the British of their association and thus be boycotted.

Ariel Lab, Simcha Monica [Heh], California, USA: When Jews sit on their hands and make excuses for decades and when the Jewish media prides itself on being liberal enough to criticize their country as if it where just another western democracy, this is the result.

Maybe now British Jews will care less about what is socially appropriate and more about virulent anti-Semitism.

Maybe now the middle left in Israel will comprehend that Jews on the right are better friends than Europeans on the left, but they just don't seem to comprehend the reality.

The initiators of this action are amongst the most prejudiced, most manipulative and most hypocritical examples of the dishonest extremist left.


Friday, April 22, 2005

Is this where Boston's money is going?

Via email:

TODAY TUESDAY APRIL 19th
AN AMERICAN JIHAD
Mahdi Bray Executive Director of the Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation in Washington D.C. will discuss his journey from sit-ins to South Africa and the steps of the State House through Islamic Activism
This event is FREE and open to the public
6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
at Roxbury Community College

Remember Mahdi Bray?

...Emerson notes that when Abdurrahman Alamoudi of the American Muslim Council, who is now serving a 23-year prison sentence for a terrorism financing conviction, encouraged the Muslim crowd at an October 2000 rally cosponsored by MPAC to declare their support of the jihad terror groups Hamas and Hizballah, “MPAC’s Political Advisor, Mahdi Bray, stood directly behind Alamoudi and was seen jubilantly exclaiming his support for these two deadly terrorist organizations.” This was just three weeks after Bray “coordinated and led a rally where approximately 2,000 people congregated in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C.” Emerson reports that “at one point during the rally, Mahdi Bray played the tambourine as one of the speakers sang, while the crowd repeated: ‘Al-Aqsa [Mosque] is calling us, let’s all go into jihad, and throw stones at the face of the Jews [sic].’”[18]...

Why does it matter to the City of Boston? Because one of the excuses given for the ISB's getting a cut-rate on the land their new Mosque is being built on is that they are providing certain community services:

...The BRA valued the parcel at $401,187.50. According to the suit, it took a cash payment of $175,000 from the center's developers, then made up the rest of the price tag by valuing at $272,663 a series of benefits the developers are granting Roxbury Community College. For example, the BRA assessed the value of a lecture series the Islamic Society of Boston plans to conduct at the college at $115,598. It assessed the value of an Islamic library of 5,000 volumes slated for the community college at $80,000. Policastro claims the valuations are "substantially inflated," and as a result the city is unconstitutionally subsidizing a religion - Islam...

According to my emailer: "The City will basically fund Islamic missionary work." Now where are all those opponents of "Faith Based Initiatives" which specifically forbid any sort of proselytizing when you need them? I wonder how the ACLU feels about this.

Now of course, we're cracking a bit wise here. I doubt that this particular lecture is being supported by the city, or being counted in as value provided for city land.

Is it?

Britain's AUT votes to boycott Israeli Universities - Where is the rest of academia?

A sad day. You knew they were going to do it.

Israel universities - statement by AUT general secretary Sally Hunt

AUT Council today decided to boycott Haifa University and the Bar-Ilan University.

The executive committee will issue guidance to AUT members on these decisions.

Council delegates also referred a call to boycott the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the executive committee will investigate the background to this and will report in due course.

Council delegates also agreed to circulate to all local associations a statement from Palestinian organisations calling for an academic boycott of Israeli institutions.

Despicable, but I'll be honest, there isn't a lot the rest of us can really do about it but prattle on is there? The ball is really quite firmly in academia's court now isn't it? What are the UK professoriat who didn't agree going to do about this? What are their American colleagues going to do about it? Do actions have consequences? Will the AUT feel any? Where are all those who screamed on and on about the likes of Ward Churchill to offend and countenance murder? Will they speak out now for academic freedom? What am I bet? Some of those people too afraid to take a stand are going to have to say something. Silence=Death.

At least someone's speaking up:

Don't Boycott Israeli Universities: Academics Sign Letter of Protest

New York, NY, April 19, 2005 … More than five hundred (500) academics from universities around the world have signed a letter, sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Scholars For Peace in the Middle East, condemning a proposal to boycott Israeli academic institutions. The proposal, demanding that British universities cut links with three of Israel's leading universities, will be debated at the annual conference of Britain's Association of University Teachers (AUT) on April 22...

ADL: Decision of British Academics to Boycott Israeli Universities 'Misguided and Ill-Timed'

New York, NY, April 22, 2005 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today strongly condemned the decision of British academics, gathered at the annual Council of the Association of University Teachers (AUT) in Eastbourne, to boycott two of Israel's leading universities. The AUT also rejected a resolution to engage in dialogue with Israeli academics, while voting for more dialogue with Palestinian academics.

"The Association of University Teachers has launched a direct assault on academic freedom," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. "We condemn this misguided and ill-timed decision to boycott academics from the only country in the Middle East where universities enjoy political independence. It is ironic that the British academics called for an end to dialogue at a time when Israelis and Palestinians are engaged in dialogue seeking a framework for peace...

At a time when the Israeli Government is expending tremendous political capital to withdraw from Gaza and offering concessions and a continued willingness to facilitate a Palestinian State in the West bank, these efforts (like those of the PC(USA) and others) strike me as being akin to the Soviet Union declaring war on Japan the day after the Hiroshima Bomb was dropped. At least Stalin figured to get something for his efforts (territory), it didn't emanate in particular from something darker and more sinister as with these people.

Update: Norm points out this piece - in The Guardian of all places: The sins of the few (worth reading in full)

...The academic boycott is a subject I know from up close. Miriam Shlesinger, who translated my books into English, was among its first victims when, in May 2002, she was dismissed from the editorial board of the Translator, a journal founded and edited by Professor Mona Baker. In her message to Miriam (and to Professor Gideon Toury, another Israeli editorial board member), Baker explained: "I can no longer live with the idea of cooperating with Israelis as such, unless it is explicitly in the context of campaigning for human rights in Palestine."

Miriam, whom I've known for many years, is the former head of Amnesty International in Israel and a well-known peace activist. Baker, by the way, was not the first to call for a boycott of her academic work. Israeli rightwingers had been irked by her signature on some petition and had called upon students at Israeli universities to refrain from attending classes given by her and others of her ilk. Unlike Baker, they at least had a case: they wanted to boycott Miriam because of her views...

...Which brings me back to the question that has bothered me ever since I was a kid. Why did the god of the Hebrews (and for the sake of disclosure, I'm a Hebrew myself) smite the first-born of Egypt? The answer that I've come up with is not very flattering: I think he did it mainly because he was lazy, wrathful and just. Lazy, because instead of trying to work out a reasonable solution and finding out who was really to blame, he opted for the easy way out. Wrathful, because it's no fun discovering that your Chosen People have been dispossessed and oppressed. And just, because he is God, and Gods, like so many academics I've met in my life, are always just - or at least, they're always convinced they are.

BTW, remind me. How many universities were there in Gaza and the West Bank prior to 1967?

ADL: Palestinian Authority Urged To Reject Anti-Semitism In Official Daily Newspaper

The easiest and primary responsibility of a government like the PA's who's press enjoys no freedom, ought to be their responsibility to end incitement and hatred.

Palestinian Authority Urged To Reject Anti-Semitism In Official Daily Newspaper

New York, NY, April 18, 2005 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today called on the Palestinian Authority to publicly reject the anti-Semitic hatred expressed by its official daily, Al-Hayat al-Jadida.

The newspaper's April 17 edition ran a cartoon depicting a Palestinian being crucified with a Star of David slashing on his back. The caption accompanying the cartoon translates as "the rights to continue the suppression of the Palestinians still exists."

"This cartoon is abhorrent for its portrayal of the classic anti-Semitic deicide charge," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. "At a time when there is renewed hope in the region, it is unfortunate that the main Palestinian daily chooses to print an offensive anti-Semitic cartoon that is contrary to the process of reconciliation between Palestinians and Israelis."

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas has called for an end to incitement against Jews in the official Palestinian media and in school textbooks.


Times Online: Saddam's men strike back in purge that left river of blood

You know, even Adolph Eichmann was so appalled and worried about the psychological damage to his men that close-range murder was doing to them he went out and sought more antiseptic ways of committing mass death. There's a whole mass-movement out there today that revels in it.

Times Online: Saddam's men strike back in purge that left river of blood

ABU QADDUM lays out the pictures of mutilated bodies dredged from the Tigris River like a player dealing cards.

Some had their hands cut off, others are headless or burnt. Another was strangled, with his tongue lolling out. He thinks one bloated, slime-covered corpse might be his younger brother.

The shocking images come from Iraq’s new killing fields — the small town of Madain just 20 miles from Baghdad...

...People were too scared to go to market for fear of being seized. At night families stood guard in two-hour shifts. Six weeks ago Abu Qaddum’s brother went to find a doctor for his sick wife and was never seen again.

The guerrillas blew up a mosque and posted notices saying that Shias should leave town or die. The Shia political parties started a press campaign — but it was dismissed by the Interior Ministry, whose officials said that the whole affair was a tribal feud.

When Iraqi troops finally moved in they found no sign of the horror. They asked through loudspeakers for witnesses to show them where the terrorists and their hostages were. The Shias were too terrified to come forward, knowing that the troops could be gone in a week.

The story was dismissed as exaggeration. Then the first bodies were found. Some had broken free of concrete slabs to which they had been tied before they were thrown in the river.

A distraught father looking for his son heard about this and hired a Baghdad diver to investigate. The diver emerged, filled with horror, saying that the riverbed was thick with bodies. So far 57 have been found but Abu Qaddum — now a refugee living in another city under an assumed name — says that local police are too afraid to retrieve any more. Locals want American troops to secure the area and send divers down for the rest. US embassy and Iraqi government spokesmen told The Times that they were investigating the affair.

This is what Fallujah was like before the coalition liberated it. Some so called humanitarians in the West are still screaming about that.

Columbia University's Middle East Institute honors Amiri Baraka

I know most of you have seen this already, but remember this is catch-up day at Solomonia.

Columbia University's Middle East Institute Sends Invitations for Event Honoring Notorious Anti-Semite Amiri Baraka

Philadelphia, April 19, 2005 - Columbia University's Middle East Institute recently sent out invitations for an event honoring Amiri Baraka, Campus Watch has learned.

Sponsored by several groups (the Radius of Arab American Writers, the National Union of Writers, NY, and Alwan for the Arts), the April 14, 2005 event featured tributes to Baraka. Its proceeds will go to support a conference of Arab American writers at Hunter College.

Baraka, born LeRoi Jones, is known for his writings on jazz, but more for his Marxism and anti-Semitism. As the poet laureate of New Jersey Baraka created a firestorm with his poem "Somebody Blew Up America," a diatribe accusing Israelis of having been warned of the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. When Baraka rebuffed calls for his resignation, New Jersey lawmakers responded by abolishing the position of poet laureate...

My emailer remarks: "The question is, why was the Middle East Institute sponsoring Amiri Baraka? He is not from the middle east, he does not write about the middle east..."

From the linked article:

Baraka's anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism reach far back into the 1960s, as does his violent animosity to whites, American society, and the West as a whole.

Oh.

Someone needs to tell these people that Islam and Democracy are not incompatible

This is both incredibly funny and sad at the same time. It's fad...it's sunny. George Galloway and his Respect voters will someday learn that you simply can't be Dhimmi enough for some people.

Times Online: Islamist 'mob' threatens Galloway with gallows

A mob of young Islamist extremists allegedly threatened to hang anti-war campaigner George Galloway last night as as the country's most bitter election battle spilled into violence on the streets of the East End.

The Respect candidate, who is fighting Labour’s Oona King for the Bethnal Green and Bow seat in East London, was meeting locals in a tenant association’s room last night with his daughter, Lucy, when a 40-strong group of militants burst in, his spokesman said today.

Locking the door behind them, the mob allegedly held Mr Galloway and his daughter captive for a few minutes and made threats.

"They said he was a false prophet and that was punishable by death," spokesman Ron McKay told Times Online. "They said for him that would be the gallows - that was presumably a play on his name."

Mr Galloway was only rescued by the arrival of two police constables, who escorted him outside to the car of his son-in-law Jay, who had called the police when he saw the gang arrive at the building on Globe Road in Bethnal Green.

Last night's incident was the second of the day involving young Islamic radicals out to disrupt the general election campaign. Earlier, a mob of protesters believed to be followers of the radical cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed stormed into the Regent's Park mosque in central London and disrupted a press conference by the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB)...

That's pretty extreme considering the MCB isn't exactly a moderate organization itself.

Continue reading "Someone needs to tell these people that Islam and Democracy are not incompatible"

I really gotta learn to speak Arabaic - or, What's going on in that Mosque?

WND: Jihad comes to Small Town, USA

...One of the men said, in Arabic: "Blonde Americans are good for something!" Another man advised him to be cautious, since there was an American woman in the room. The imam spoke up and told everyone I didn't speak Arabic.

At that point, another student took the podium. His name was Khaled, and he began to recount his recent trip to New York City. Khaled and three of his companions had gone to New York for several days in January. He told of how uncomfortable his trip up to NYC had been. He felt like he was being watched, and thought he was the victim of racial profiling.

Khaled and his friends were pretty unhappy about it, and while in New York, they came up with a plan to "teach a lesson" to the passengers and crew. You can imagine the story Khaled told. He described how he and his friends whispered to each other on the flight, made simultaneous visits to the restroom, and generally tried to "spook" the other passengers. He laughed when he described how several women were in tears, and one man sitting near him was praying.

The others in the room thought the story was quite amusing, judging from the laughter. The imam stood up and told the group that this was a kind of peaceful civil disobedience that should be encouraged, and commended Khaled and his friends for their efforts.

He pointed out that it was through this kind of civil disobedience that ethnic profiling would fail.

One of the other men, Ahmed from Kuwait, gave a brief account of his friend Eyad, who had finally gone to Iraq. Ahmed was in e-mail contact with Eyad, and hoped by the following week to be able to bring them more information about the state of the "mujahideen" in Iraq.

As the meeting drew to a close, the imam gave a brief speech calling for the protection of Allah on the mujahideen fighting for Islam throughout the world, and reminded everyone that it was their duty as Muslims to continue in the path of jihad, whether it was simple efforts like those of Khaled and his friends, or the actual physical fighting of men like Eyad.

As the meeting broke up, several women in hijabs came in the room, and two of them sat with me. They were very warm and friendly and welcoming, and appeared to be clearly thrilled that I was there. They asked me questions about who I was, and why I was interested in the session...


Saudi Funded Ads - Coming to a station near you

(Note: I'm back! Probably going to be sifting through email and posting on subjects that may be a few days out of date to those of you who stay up to speed on the blogs on a daily basis, so sorry for that, but I'm a link pack-rat, I just can't help it. BTW, met and interviewed Richard Landes yesterday, also got a peek at the CAMERA offices. Probably won't have a post ready on the interview for awhile, though. Over an hour of audio to sift and transcribe.)

You think that Saudi funding is only causing trouble overseas? You think it's only in certain mosques here in the States? Well it's on the radio now, too, and may be in your city now.

Boston Phoenix: PR - The Saudi connection

...A series of radio advertising spots ran in 30 cities across the United States in early April. One, titled "Occupation," extolled the Arab League’s "fair plan to end the senseless violence in the Mideast." The plan, according to the advertisement, involved Israel’s "withdrawal from the Palestinian land it has unjustly occupied for years.... There will be no more midnight raids and random searches, no more violence." It did not condemn Palestinian terrorist bombings aimed at Israeli civilians. Another ad, titled "Peace Plan," stated: "To stop the cycle of violence, we must first end the military occupation of Palestinian towns and neighborhoods." Again, no mention of Palestinian terrorism and no mention of the peace offer made by former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, which would have given the Palestinian Authority possession of 97 percent of the West Bank — an offer Yasser Arafat turned down in 2000. Both ads concluded with the slogan "Start the peace — end the occupation," followed by the words "paid for by the Alliance of Peace and Justice."

Must be just another grassroots group fighting to get Israel out of the West Bank, right? Not exactly. The ads were placed by Sandler-Innocenzi, a political-advertising agency that has done spots for Republican House majority whip Tom DeLay and the Republican National Committee, among others. A Sandler-Innocenzi staffer contacted by the Phoenix acknowledged involvement with the ad and gave a phone number and address for the Alliance of Peace and Justice. The address — 8484 Westpark Drive in McLean, Virginia — is the home of media firm Qorvis Communications. Where does this complicated trail lead? To the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which, according to the federal government’s Foreign Agents Registration Act office, hired Qorvis on March 6. Qorvis did not respond to phone calls requesting comment on the ads.

The Saudis, of course, don’t acknowledge the ads. A woman working in the Saudi embassy’s information office says, "We have nothing to do with those ads. We don’t know who that is." To be sure, just because the Saudis have a financial relationship with Qorvis doesn’t mean they placed them. But the plan of the "League of Arab Nations" described in the ads sounds suspiciously like the one recently floated by Saudi crown prince Abdullah. In addition, those who have looked into the matter say radio-advertising salespeople involved with the buy report that the Saudis were behind them. "Believe it or not the Saudi Arabian Embassy wants to get on 4/8 and 4/15 so I was able to use the new rates," reads a redacted April 4 e-mail made available to the Phoenix by Steve Silberfarb, the executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas. Silberfarb, in turn, received the e-mail from a radio executive who wanted to remain anonymous. Mstreet.Net, which covers the radio industry, reported Tuesday that "the Saudi-funded ‘Alliance for Peace and Justice’ bought time on about 100 US stations."...

Not only do they spread their propaganda here, but they lie about doing it.

Oh, and when you hear the words "Peace and Justice," cover your wallet, count your fingers and watch your back.

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Technical Update - Updated

Technical/Administrative announcement.

Hi there! A couple things:

I am planning on changing hosting services (I'm joining the club and moving to Hosting Matters). That means the site may go down for a bit when I start the move, and may be a tad flaky when it comes back up while I flip the requisite switches to get things going smoothly again. Hopefully that won't take very long.

I've not started the move quite yet, but I won't be posting much between now and then (I reserve the right to change this) as I may lose the posts and any comments. This will happen very soon, I hope.

To wet your appetite for future content, I am planning on meeting with Professor Richard Landes later in the week to possibly interview him for the blog (search for "Landes" in the search box to find out what he's about). That should result in something interesting.

Sorry if posting has been relatively sporadic of late. With Spring and nice weather, lots of yard work and painting and staining to do, busy at work, and my foolishness in re-installing Civilization 3...well, you know how it goes. I have tried to make sure that there is usually something interesting to look at here on any given day.

Keep checking back early and often, and thanks for your continued visits.

Update: 4/20 10:30PM - Switch seems to have been successful - and smooth - only lost one comment that was left in between the time I backed-up the database and when I switched things over. I even upgraded to the latest version of MT while I was at it. Please report any problems you see. Kudos to Hosting Matters for helping me get the database re-installed. Here I thought tech support was just the people you called when the site was down. Who knew they actually...did stuff?

Back to regular posting soon - but maybe not till Friday.

Monday, April 18, 2005

'Florida Islamic group under scrutiny for neo-Nazi ties'

Not very surprising.

Jihad Watch: Florida Islamic group under scrutiny for neo-Nazi ties

A new Islamic advocacy group in Boca Raton is under scrutiny for its ties to William W. Baker, a former chairman of the neo-Nazi political party of presidential candidate David Duke who was run out of town last year when he attempted to speak at Florida Atlantic University.

Local Jewish and civic leaders said Friday they were alarmed that the Assadiq Islamic Education Foundation, whose headquarters are listed at 831 E. Palmetto Park Road in Boca, had invited Baker back to Boca as featured speaker at an April 30 banquet at the Boca Marriott. Invited by Muslim students to speak at Florida Atlantic University in April 2004, Baker's first visit to the city was cancelled amid popular protest.

"I'd like to give [the Assadiq Foundation] the benefit of the doubt and say they got snookered, but this is the second attempt at getting Baker into Boca Raton, so they have to be aware of his reputation," said Bill Gralnick, southeast regional director of the American Jewish Committee...


NUS Update

Last week I re-posted the resignation speech given on behalf of three resigning Jewish members of Britain's National Union of Students. I now understand the NUS to be quite an influential body.

The speech itself gave few details as to what, exactly, led to the decision, but this article (via Dhimmi Watch) provides a bit more information.

Times Online: Dons' boycott raises Jewish student fear

HOSTILITY to Jewish students at British universities could escalate this week with moves by academics to boycott Israeli goods and set up links with Palestinian organisations.

Luciana Berger, 23, a close friend of Euan Blair, the prime minister’s son, described last week how she had been forced to resign from the executive committee of the National Union of Students (NUS) after being abused and spat at by left-wing undergraduates and Muslim activists because she is Jewish...

...Berger, who comes from a Jewish family in north London and is studying for a master’s degree in government, politics and policy at Birkbeck College, London University, said opposition to Israel was resulting in abuse of Jewish students.

She said she had resigned from the students’ union earlier this month because of its failure to stand up to racism. “It says it is proud of its policy of diversity but it should be ashamed. It has isolated the Jewish student community,” she said.

“The situation cannot be allowed to get worse. I have had e-mails calling me a dirty Zionist pig, but I have never spoken on or talked about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. People have confused the issue.”

She also criticised how prejudice against Jews was seen by some on the left as “second-class racism”.

Berger described her shock at experiencing anti-semitism as a student. “Suddenly I was Luciana the Jew rather than Luciana the British citizen,” she said. On one occasion, she claimed, the NUS failed to condemn a comment made at London University’s School of Oriental and African Studies that burning down a synagogue was “a rational act”...

...Danny Stone, campaigns director of the Union of Jewish Students, said academics were increasingly upsetting Jewish undergraduates. He claimed lecturers at London, Sussex and Nottingham had refused to give students leave from exams scheduled for the Jewish sabbath. One allegedly told a student: “We can all think of silly religions if we want.”

Douglas Davis, author of a new book, Israel in the World: Changing Lives Through Innovation, said: “Some British universities are reminiscent of Germany in the 1930s. Let us not forget that the first place Hitler had Jews banned from was the universities.”

Indeed.

Norm: 'Tonge's proudest moment'

Norm:

This is it:

Dr Jennifer Tonge says:
On her proudest achievement in parliament since 2001: "Highlighting the plight of the Palestinians under occupation by Israel, by making a speech expressing empathy for suicide bombers - looking for the cause of terrorism."

Yes, that's 'proudest' and 'empathy' and 'bombers'.

Isn't she lovely?

From January 2004: Lib Dem MP: Why I would consider being a suicide bomber

Sunday, April 17, 2005

Spring is Busting Out All Over

Here are a few Spring pictures for you - stuff popping out of the ground round these parts. I'm happy to have pretty much finished my Spring raking - wherein I mercilessly comb my entire lawn, churning up old grass, pine needles, moss and weak grass. I worried about that last year, but the grass came in real nice, so my shoulders weren't too happy, but the lawn will be. I've also decided to give one of those ChemLawn-type places a try. I figure it's only a bit more expensive than doing it myself, and they'll actually apply the stuff properly. Die crabgrass! Die weeds! Drown in the wrath of my hired mercenaries of hate!

I also repainted some of the badly peeling trim on my shed - a long overdue project. Next I need a bit more mulch and some other odds and ends, but I shudder to think of what Home Depot is like on this fine, sunny Sunday.

Oh, I've also included a couple of bonus pictures of jellyfish taken at the New England Aquarium last week. We finally bought a family membership. (Hey "King", remind me that's 80 bucks I can write off my taxes next year!)

Saturday, April 16, 2005

A North Korean Defector - 50 years past

World-Wide MEMRI?

Here's an interesting new news site that takes foreign-language news from all over the world, translates it and posts it. The theme: all of the stories are about the USA.

Watching America

I've added it to the "News Resources" drop-down at left.

The page is a bit of a mish-mash at the moment, but I'm sure more organization will come with time, and the content should prove very, very useful.

"Anti-Semitic studies"

Via LGF comes this very good Spectator column on the proposed British academic boycott.

The Spectator: Anti-Semitic studies

Pay attention, Professor. If you support the proposed academic boycott of Israel — and if you are to remain intellectually honest — prepare for a radical lifestyle change. Firstly, unplug your computer. Good. Now switch off your interactive digital television set. Well done. And now throw away your mobile phone. Excellent. You see, Professor, these machines are not only the engine of the globalised, capitalist world but they also depend on technologies that have been produced by Israeli academics in the Zionist entity.

Stop playing with your detached mouse, Professor, and concentrate. I’m afraid you may not use the British Library because it has been computerised by Ex Libris, a Zionist company that was spawned by the odious Hebrew University of Jerusalem. And if, God forbid, you develop problems of the small intestine, you may not pop the Zionist-invented ‘video capsule’, which passes naturally through your body as it monitors this delicate piece of your anatomy. You will, sadly, have to take it up the derrière, Professor. As a matter of principle, of course. But remember: your principle allows your proctologist to keep his hand in...

The rest is in the extended entry due to annoying registration.

Continue reading ""Anti-Semitic studies""

Liberal Hate Speech

From who else but the Boston Globe's own...Derrick Z. Jackson. /cue fanfare

Do you have concerns about Gay Marriage? Not keen on abortion? Think people coming in to the country illegally should be kept out? Why then, you're just like...Eric Rudolph!

Eric Rudolph's legacy

...Rudolph will be put away for life. A Los Angeles Times feature this week said his guilty plea marked the continued fall of extreme, antigovernment individuals and paramilitary, right-wing militia groups that stirred controversy at the time of the Oklahoma City bombing. The Times quoted Vincent Coppola, author of ''Dragons of God: A Journey Through Far-Right America," as saying, ''My guess is today we're at the low ebb of a movement that comes and goes." He said Rudolph ''is sort of an artifact of another time. That doesn't mean the time won't come again."

Artifact? Another time? Rudolph may be put away for all time because he used deadly violence. But there are still many people doing his bidding. After Massachusetts's highest court legalized gay marriage, 11 states passed amendments to ban gay marriage in last November's elections. President Bush supports a federal constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

On abortion, several states and the Bush administration have added restrictions in American domestic and foreign policy, behind the code language of the ''culture of life." As to ''global socialism," which can easily be interpreted as the sharing of Americans' wealth in a multi--cultural world, the signs are pretty obvious that Rudolph's spirit is alive and well there, too...

Imagine the Globe printing a "conservative" version of this? An Ann Coulter column anyone? WhooooBoy.

Don't bother reading the whole thing.

Friday, April 15, 2005

A Telling Vision

Read David's post and then watch the Israeli TV commercial he links to. Then ask yourself in what other countries would that commercial fly? Iran? The PA? Keep guessing. And be real now. That game should tell you quite a lot about the societies in question.

Archaeological Damage at the Temple Mount

This is only partially about religion. You didn't need to be a Buddhist to have been disgusted by the Taliban when they blew up those ancient Buddhist statues, and you don't have to be a Jew to be disgusted at the wanton Muslim destruction of ancient archaeological ruins on the Temple Mount.

Israeli archaeologists are sifting through the rubble of a garbage dump in order to recover the remains of antiquities destroyed and history lost as the Islamic Wakf, responsible for the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, built a new, enormous underground mosque and simply dumped what they didn't destroy.

Do visiting Columbia scholar Claire Smith and the World Archaeological Congress know about this? Do the people calling for the Israelis to turn the entire old city of Jerusalem over to the PA know about this?

A disgusting crime of religious intolerance. A disgusting crime against history.

Temple Mount relics saved from garbage

On the grounds of a Jerusalem national park with a view of the Temple Mount, a small group of Israeli archaeologists and volunteers sifting through piles of rubble discarded by Islamic Wakf officials from the Temple Mount into a city garbage dump have recently uncovered a series of history-rich artifacts dating back to the First and Second Temple periods.

The five-month old privately-funded project underway at the site, which is being directed by Bar Ilan University archeology professor Dr. Gabriel Barkay, is being called virtually unprecedented since archaeological excavation has never been permitted on the Temple Mount itself.

Six years ago, following the Islamic Wakf's unilateral construction of a mosque at an underground area of the Temple Mount known as Solomon's Stables, Wakf officials discarded more than 10,000 tons of rubble with history-rich artifacts, at a municipal garbage dump in the Kidron Valley and other locations outside the Old City.

The November 1999 destruction and removal of the antiquities in the wake of the mosque construction was later called "an unprecedented archaeological crime" by the head of Israel's Antiquities Authority, the state-run archaeological body nominally charged with supervision at Judaism's holiest site, as well as by Israel's leading archaeologists...


"Presbyterians Won’t Budge on Divesting"

People are starting to notice that the PC(USA)'s divestment efforts may not all be on the up and up. (Hat Tip: emailers)

Presbyterians Won’t Budge on Divesting

You have to hand it to those Presbyterians. Their leaders know what they want, and they won’t be deflected by things like logic, fairness or the well-being of people in the Middle East.

Church leaders in Louisville, Ky., appear determined to single out Israel for corporate “divestment,” and apparently no amount of internal revolt or outside input will dissuade them.

That’s a big problem for mainstream Jewish groups that have always operated on the principle that dialogue is the first step in dealing with intergroup conflict. The plain fact is that the Presbyterian leaders just aren’t listening.

Groups like the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League, while reporting useful discussions with local Presbyterian groups, are fed up with the national church leadership. For months after the Presbyterian Church (USA) voted to begin a process of “selective divestment” against companies that do business in Israel, the Jewish groups continued to believe that a policy of hard-headed dialogue would help church leaders understand the glaring imbalance of their efforts.

Eventually, they believed, logic would prevail, and the Presbyterians would realize that at the very least, the timing of their action — at the precise moment when the region seemed to be moving toward a new peace process — was perverse...

...Jewish groups are beginning to accept the obvious conclusion: The time for dialogue with the hostile, irrational Presbyterian leadership has passed and a more confrontational approach is in order, including publicly challenging their motives and their commitment to a fair peace in the region. At the same time, dialogue with other groups that have proven more sensitive and with local Presbyterian groups needs to be increased.

The point should be emphasized over and over again: It’s not just the knee-jerk defenders of Israel and Likudniks who think divestment is a terrible idea, but Jewish groups from across the ideological spectrum.

Jewish leaders worked hard to get through to the Presbyterians, but church leaders weren’t listening; they have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that dialogue is not their goal, a fair peace not their real interest, and they should be dealt with accordingly.

Those interested in the issue should read it in full.

Hezbollah Blogging

Michael J. Totten is blogging from Beirut. Interesting.

...East and West Beirut are packed from one end to the other with restaurants, bars, nightclubs, casinos, bohemian bookstores, outdoor cafes, and shopping districts that rival the best in the world. Hezbollahland is a world apart. It is like another country down there - a bad country. It is a terrorist-ruled security-state within a state. The Lebanese Armed Forces are not allowed to enter Hezbollah's territory. Most Christians and Sunni Muslims never dare set foot inside. (Hezbollah is a radical Shiite Muslim militia.) They don't even know what Hezbollahland looks like. I do, and I took some photos...

Thursday, April 14, 2005

NY Sun: 'Hamas on the Pope'

Time for a little perspective. This was forwarded to me, as you need to be a subscriber to read most NY Sun pieces.

Hamas on the Pope

New York Sun Staff Editorial

April 14, 2005

Our friends at the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies in Israel send along a report on anti-Israel incitement in the Palestinian Authority. Among the items it mentions is an article published in the Hamas newspaper in Gaza, Al-Rissalah, on April 7. The article issued by the Islamic extremist terrorists was an attack on Pope John Paul II for - get this - being a Christian heretic. The pope's "terrific heresy"? He "absolved modern-day Jews from the guilt of having murdered Jesus." According to the Hamas newspaper, modern day Jews are "criminals like their ancestors." Another problem with the pope, according to the Hamas newspaper, was his attitude toward the Holocaust. His call for Christians to ask forgiveness was "a service to the Zionists" and "Pope John Paul II's worst crime," according to the Hamas newspaper. This is the environment in which elements of the American press and State Department focus on the obstacle to peace in the Middle East as being Prime Minister Sharon's decision to build some houses for Jews in an Israeli suburb four and a half miles from Jerusalem.


The Irrelevant Rewarding the Impotent

Vancouver Anthropologist is World Utopian Champion

At a gala in Stockholm Dr Cyril Belshaw of Vancouver was named World Utopian Champion. This followed a one year global competition. Dr Belshaw's entry was entitled From Youth Maturity to Global Government.

(PRWEB) April 9, 2005 -- Dr. Cyril Belshaw, Emeritus Professor in the University of British Columbia, has been named the winner of the 2004 World Utopian Championship, SOC Stockholm announced at a gala in that city on 2nd April 2005. His attendance at the gala was supported by the Canadian Embassy to Sweden.

Dr. Belshaw led the field from numerous countries and disciplines with a contribution entitled “From Youth Maturity to Global Government”. In it he suggests changes which he believes can be achieved during this century. They include the replacement of schools by Youth Maturity Institutes which bring together all agencies and interests concerned with the whole life of the child. They would emphasize the development of values such as risk taking, courtesy, lifetime interests outside the classroom and the abhorrence of violence in any form. He then devotes a section to a wide range of other institutional changes which will be elaborated upon in future writing, and finishes his holistic prescription with a detailed proposal to reform Global Government, dependent on attitudes deriving from the Youth Maturity Institutes.. He would re-structure the United Nations to become an organisation of “Peoples” rather than of “States”, equipped with wider powers, a stream-lined parliamentary organisation, and holding a monopoly of armed force. He advocates the use of NGOs, global debate, and the will of the people to bring about the changes.

One of the final Expert Jurors, Professor Tom Boylan, Director of the Ralahine Centre for Utopian Studies in the University of Limerick writes: “He combines sober and informed utopian realism with the best of imaginative utopian hope...

"Utopian realism"...OK. Meanwhile, back in the real world...blogging continues.

Update: Link changed. The homepage of the Utopian World Championship is here.

Vomit-In at Harvard

If you want to understand why some of us former "liberals" started to listen a little closer to the other side, and even (and therefore) started agreeing with them on a lot of things, it's because of the behavior of some of the people who we were formerly aligned with, like the people who showed up to a CIA and DHS recruiting panel at Harvard...one of whom induced himself to vomit. (via Best of the Web)

The Crimson: Political Vomit

Yesterday was the first time that I was both embarrassed and ashamed to be associated with my fellow Harvard students.

At 3 p.m. yesterday, the Harvard Office of Career Services hosted a counterterrorism career panel that included representatives from the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, and two non-partisan security think tanks. Joining the panelists were two distinct groups of Harvard students: one genuinely interested in potential careers in counter-terrorism, and another group consisting of rude, self-proclaimed morally superior, intellectually indoctrinated protestors. Let me be perfectly clear, while a tasteful protest marched on outside the Science Center, I am referring to the disruptive protestors sitting at the event. The propagandists' techniques of disruption varied: their base tactics ranged from coughing incessantly to the point where none of the panelists could be heard, interrupting presentations to ask ludicrous questions such as "Isn't it true you train your employees to torture," staging a mock deportation of an ethnic minority protestor midway through the discussion, clapping obnoxiously to halt the dialogue, and ridiculing students who posed legitimate questions to the panelists. A protestor sitting three rows behind me physically made himself vomit...

This article identifies the guy as "Matthew R. Skomarovsky '03". And to think Harvard didn't accept me, but they graduated that guy. Make yourself puke? Hell, even I, a mere BU graduate know enough to do that into a toilet.

Which reminds me of a very old joke:

A Harvard guy and a BU guy (you could sub-in any two schools) are relieving themselves at two urinals.

When they finish, the Harvard guy stops and washes his hands, while the BU guy heads straight for the door.

So the Harvard guy says, "You know, at Hahvahd, they teach us to wash our hands after urinating."

To which the BU guy replies, "Oh yeah? At BU they teach us not to piss on our hands."

Buhdumpbump.

The author concludes her piece with this little spotlight on that oh-so-typical Leftist hypocrisy:

...In the end, for a group of students that claims to be advocating among many other causes, for workers’ rights, who do you think will clean up the remnants of your protest? That’s right, the Harvard worker, who you loftily claim to be advocating for, is cleaning up your disgusting vomit.

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Caterpillar Shareholder Resolution Defeated 97-3 - with on-scene report and a bonus

Apropos of this post at LGF: LA Times: "Jews" Target Killdozer Day (the LA Times is nuts) in which the Times article makes the point that backers of an anti-Israel shareholder resolution hoped to get at least 6% of the vote so they could waste everyone's time again next year...

They failed.

Miami Herald: Caterpillar shareholders vote down bulldozer resolution

CHICAGO - Caterpillar Inc. shareholders on Wednesday soundly rejected a resolution that would have directed the heavy equipment manufacturer to investigate the use of its bulldozers by the Israeli army to demolish Palestinian homes.

The resolution, which the company said at its annual meeting was defeated 97 percent to 3 percent, stated that Israel has used Caterpillar equipment to destroy more than 3,000 homes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip since 2000.

It was introduced by four Roman Catholic orders of nuns and the group Jewish Voice for Peace, who argued that the sale of company equipment for such purposes violates Caterpillar's code of business conduct.

Dozens of protesters lined the sidewalk outside before the meeting, next to a huge banner reading "Caterpillar bulldozers destroy Palestinian homes."

"Caterpillar's sale of weaponized bulldozers [Is that like Africanized bees? -Sol] to the Israeli military is tantamount to selling a gun to a person you know is planning to kill someone," [Or to someone you know is a target for murder. -S] said Liat Weingart, co-director of Jewish Voice for Peace. "Though Caterpillar is not actually behind the wheel, they are providing the machinery as well as training and support for the Israeli military to harm civilians."

Other Jewish organizations had opposed the resolution as unfairly singling out Israel for economic pressure without holding Palestinians accountable for acts contributing to unrest in the region.

Caterpillar's board of directors urged defeat of the resolution, saying that the company has "neither the legal right nor the means to police individual use" of its equipment...

Ouch. 97-3. Back to finding new ways to annoy people I guess. They'll be back. Those of you who were following the Somerville divestment issue will be pleased(?) to know the divestment people were right back on their horse in spite of their defeat, and are currently formulating new techniques for displaying their misguided moral superiority. [continued]

Continue reading "Caterpillar Shareholder Resolution Defeated 97-3 - with on-scene report and a bonus"

The Truth Sometimes Hurts

Standford Daily: Muslim leaders leave Israel event

... Three employees of the worldwide organization Israel at Heart, a group that educates college students about life in Israel, discussed their experiences in and perspectives on the Middle Eastern country where they have lived for several years.

Merav Mov is a 23-year-old woman who served in the Israeli National Guard; Shlomit Aylin, also 23, immigrated to Israel from Ethiopia at age three; and Eytan Schwartz, a 30-year-old game show winner. The three spoke on both the major social and political issues in Israel today, as well as what Judaism means to each of them personally.

“We want people to know about the vibrant life in Israel,” Schwartz said. “The hangouts, the sports, the nightlife, the food — people don’t know about it. We want people to understand how much we love living in Israel.”

The feud between Israelis and Palestinians came up later in the conversation. Senior Rania Eltom, president of the Muslim Students Awareness Network, and sophomore Omar Shakir, co-president of the Coalition for Justice in the Middle East, left the event following several comments that they said they found disrespectful.

“I was requested to attend the event by organizers the day before, so I came out of respect for them,” Eltom said. “However, when we entered the event, it was made very obvious that we were outsiders. As soon as the speakers started generalizing Palestinians as wanting to kill all soldiers, it hit a nerve within me, especially [since it was] one day after three Palestinian school kids were shot dead by Israeli soldiers.”...

It might make Ms Eltom feel slightly better to know that those three were probably not just school kids, but probably not. That's the trouble with propaganda and lies. They make real peace and reconciliation more difficult. You can't make peace with a constructed reality as your foundation. It always falls apart.

...Eltom added that she was very offended when the speakers talked about how suicide bombers are glorified in Palestinian classrooms...

The nerve! BTW, still highly recommend you watch that 90 second flash.

Plaut on Klocek

Stephen Plaut takes aim at the DePaul administration and Norman Finkelstein in this defense of Thomas Klocek. Cue the DePaul administration with their letter denying their actions had anything to do with Klocek's views and everything to do with his behavior.

DeNial At DePaul: The Thomas Klocek Affair

...The university contends that Klocek`s case "is not a case of academic freedom, but a situation of inappropriate behavior outside the classroom by a university employee," in the words of the university spokesperson. This coming from an institution that has no problems with the behavior of the aforementioned Norman Finkelstein.

Klocek’s dismissal is alleged by the administration to be due the fact that, as he walked away from the students in question, he “thumbed his chin” at them. It`s a common Italian expression meaning, “I`m finished, I`m out of here.” But in a special letter to the student newspaper DePaulia, Dean Susanne Dumbleton first apologized for the incident and stated that the instructor was being dealt with in an appropriate manner. The dean then referred to Klocek`s attempt to impose his “erroneous views” on the students. This belied the claim by the university that Klocek’s case is about his supposed attitude, not the content of his statements.

In other words, support for Israel against Arab aggression and terrorism is “erroneous” and not to be tolerated on the DePaul campus...


Teach Kids Peace

A new Human Rights group (new to me, anyway) is holding rallies at campuses across the US today.

Teach Kids Peace

Teach Kids Peace™ is an international human rights organization dedicated to ending the Culture of Hatred that is being taught to children, and to encourage the promotion of peace education for children in conflict zones, though raising public awareness and calling on world leaders to take the required action to prevent this form of child abuse.

Teach Kids Peace focuses primarily on the Middle East, long the center of world history and civilization. With a wave of electoral progress in the region -- Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Palestinian areas, and the glimmer of progress toward a comprehensive peace agreement with Israel -- it is now more crucial than ever to ensure that children are educated toward peace...

Don't miss the 90 second flash.

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

CAMERA has a blog

Media watch-dog, CAMERA, has a new blog...which kindly links this site. I predict great things for their blogging efforts!

(Via Lynn B.)

Daily Scorecard: NYTimes Romanticizes Belligerent Professor Joseph Massad

New blog Daily Scorecard finds the New York Times granting a puff-profile to one of the central figures of the Columbia University controversy. Not a big surprise coming from the media outlet that agreed not to interview students in return for early access for to Columbia's report.

Daily Scorecard: NYTimes Romanticizes Belligerent Professor Joseph Massad

A week after Columbia released its report findings on apparent intimidation of students by 'strident' pro Palestinian Professors - the NYTimes writes a dripping hero worship piece on Joseph Massad, the most egregious offender...

Update: Ariel at CampusJ isn't too pleased, either: Honoring the Bully

No credit where credit is due?

One local blogger thinks the Jewish Telegraphic Agency used his work as a source and didn't give him credit.

You be the judge.

More overt anti-Semitism from a Presbyterian Church Official?

Bad analysis, bogus quote. I don't like to toss around charges of anti-Semitism. The reason I post about it so much here is because there's so damn much of it out there and it's not hard to find. Is this an example? Denial of Jewish naitonal self-determination, use of bogus quotes and bad history to demonize the Jewish State and deny its legitimacy, siding with and apologizing for those who want to murder Jews, whitewashing a Nazi [al-Husseini] and his legacy...you be the judge. The politics is enough.

Here's how the author of this letter to the Presbyterian Layman has been described to me. He's not just another member, but was at one time a person of responsibility within a church who still uses that position presumably to give his words more weight:

David Neunuebel of Santa Barbara, California was Moderator (2000-2001) of Santa Barbara Presbytery. He is an anti-Israel activist with Americans for a Just Peace in the Middle East, a group that, like Neunuebel, demonizes Israel and insists on placing all blame for the situation in the Middle East on Israel alone.

On April 7, 2005 Neunuebel published a letter in the Presbyterian Layman that went beyond his habitual demonization blind hatred of Israel to stray into overt anti-Semitism.

Here is Neunuebel's letter to The Layman, with some follow-up letters in reponse. The Layman does not have permalinks to letters, but right now, this letter resides here.

Writer says PCUSA divestment focus is on illegal occupation, not Israel

After the letter to the editor by Susan Pentlin, Ph.D from Warrensburg, Mo. [posted February 15, 2005], I think she may not understand what the G.A. has actually suggested. The G.A. passed an overture to research the idea of divesting our multi-billion dollar investment portfolio of companies who facilitate the illegal Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. It's a study. If the study determines that there would be efficacy in bringing a just peace to this conflict, the next step would be to identify those companies who facilitate the occupation. Then we would confront these companies to share our concerns and try to get them to cease their activities in this area. If the companies decline, we would work on organizing a shareholder resolution to force the company to end its work in the occupied territories. The focus is on the illegal occupation, not on the state of Israel. We have consistently supported Israel's right to exist and right to live in security.

Dr. Pentlin's suggestion that we've disregarded the history of the establishment of Israel is uninformed at best. To suggest that the assembly failed to understand that the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was an "avid supporter of Adolf Hitler, even visiting him in Berlin," is a bit silly. What does that have to do with the current consistent violation of human rights perpetrated on the Palestinians by Israel? Besides, the Zionists were in bed with the Nazis both in Palestine and in Germany for years during WWII; what would we do with that fact?[...continued with responses in the extended entry.]


Continue reading "More overt anti-Semitism from a Presbyterian Church Official?"

Ray Bradbury on the Present

Yes, I finally got around to reading the Ray Bradbury uber-classic, Fahrenheit 451 - the "50th anniversary edition." In the back is an interview with the author for this new edition. You can tell that some of these are not the answers his interlocutor wanted. I enjoyed these particularly:

...

DelRey: It's that social element that seems the most prescient to me now. Not just because of the popularity of reality TV, the ubiquity of the Internet, but also--and actually, this does seem political--because the similarity between the situation of the United States in Fahrenheit 451 and the country today. In the book, the U.S. is involved in an ongoing, nebulously defined war. Combat jets are forever streaking overhead. The rest of the world hates us, and we can't understand why.[That's not in the book. -Sol] To some people, this describes the current situation exactly, with an open-ended war against terrorism and armed conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq, the latter in the face of widespread protests. Do you think the country is moving closer to the fictional America you wrote about fifty years ago?

Ray Bradbury: Not for a moment. The main problem is education, not politics. The teachers of our country have to be taught to start teaching reading and writing in kindergarten and first grade. By the time children go to the second grade, they should know how to read and write completely, as was the case in other generations. I was in the first grade in 1926, and my teachers were all poor: they made eight hundred dollars a year, but they taught reading and writing completely by the end of the first grade. The government has nothing to do with that. The educational system needs to be corrected.

DR: Teachers still don't make much money--

RB: It has nothing to do with pay. Either you love what you're doing or...Look, I wrote for years, and I wasn't paid. My love carried me through all those years. I sold newspapers on the street corner. When I was twenty-two, I was making ten dollars a week. When I started making twenty dollars a week from selling stories, I stopped selling newspapers. You're either in love with what you do, or you're not in love.

...

DR: What forms of censorship do you regard as the most dangerous today?

RB: There are none in our country. We have too many groups for censorship to be possible. We have Catholics and Jews and Protestants, and Republicans and Democrats, and women's libbers, and lesbians and homosexuals and bisexuals, and young and old...We're all watching each other, so there's no chance for censorship. The main problem is the idiot TV. If you watch local news, your head will turn to mush.

...

DR: Why did you choose the literature to be remembered by the book people in Fahrenheit 451? I was particularly struck that you included the gospel of Luke to be remembered, whereas the movie chose not to do so.[I have not seen the movie. -Sol]

RB: Why Luke? I don't know. I was raised in the Baptist church, and so I knew all those Biblical texts. And, of course, the other ones in the book, too. But I didn't really choose them. My subconscious picked for me.

...

I was struck by the Biblical references, too, and I wondered how many authors would choose them today, in spite of their power.

The Administration v. Klocek

The DePaul administration is trying hard to get their point of view out there, but they've got a lot of holes to plug. Saturday, President Holtschneider wrote in to the Rocky Mountain News to attempt to "set the record straight" that the actions taken against Klocek were a result of the professor's actions, not his opinions. As I've noted here before, that dog just won't hunt, but the best response so far was from Klocek's colleague, Professor Jonathan Cohen and can be read in this post. When a member of a community - any community - is viewed as not possessing politically correct opinions, it's not long before not only their opinions, but every aspect of the details of their behavior is picked to pieces to provide justification for their villification. Klocek's in a tough spot.

About those "Soccer Players"

About that widely reported story of Israel shooting three "kids playing soccer" the other day... A PA official has admitted they were probably smugglers. Please don't tell me you actually thought the Israelis would have shot some kids playing soccer too close to a "forbidden zone". On second thought, if you believed that, please don't tell me. Of course the image of kids playing ball near a border and being shot out of hand for straying is the usual concentration camp imagery that Palestinian propaganda loves to propagate and that the press absolutely gobbles up even though they've gone far past the point at which they should know better.

Haaretz: In face of mortars, Israel grits its teeth

...The Gaza command was meanwhile continuing its investigation of the circumstances that led to the shooting of three 14-year-olds from Rafah, on the Philadelphi route. The Israel Defense Forces is almost certain that the youths were somehow involved in smuggling weapons from Egypt. A videotape from the observation post documents them approaching the Egyptian border, far beyond the reach of a kicked football that Palestinian witnesses said they had gone to retrieve.

A squad commander and a sharpshooter from Golani shot them. The members of this division are backing up the soldiers: The rules of engagement in Philadelphi are different because of the weapons-smuggling. In about 40 incidents over the last two months along the Green Line, troops have not fired as Palestinians crossed over. The people who have attempted these crossings, nearly all of them looking for a way to make some money, were arrested on the Israeli side.

The commander of the Palestinian forces inside Gaza, Mussa Arafat, reported - both to Israel and the PA leadership - that the youths were smugglers. But the PA announcements on the subject focused on condemning Israel for shooting youths...


Chrenkoff: 'Senior German parliamentarian on a conspiracy rampage'

The appearance of Bernard Cardinal Law presiding over the funeral mass of the recently departed Pope has raised a lot of hackles here in the Boston area, he being the former Archdiocese Cardinal for this area who presided over the time period when most of the priest sex-abuse was going on, and who apparently covered-up for much of it as well. This is not surprising, considering the scope of the scandal. Some people have some, shall we say, "novel" ideas about the scandal, however:

Senior German parliamentarian on a conspiracy rampage

...The person in question is Antje Vollmer, the Green Party member and, more importantly, the vice-president of Germany's Parliament, the Bundestag.
"As a guest on the weekly talk show 'Berlin Mitte,' Vollmer seemed to be starting off with the right intentions. She spoke of the 'wonderful image' of President George Bush, his son President George W. Bush and President Bill Clinton before the body of the pope in St. Peter's Basilica. But then, out of nowhere, she veered straight off a cliff.

"Her theory? It seems the U.S. had to do something to weaken the influence of the pope, who was an outspoken opponent of the war in Iraq. Vollmer finds it all very suspicious that after the war, 'Poland was made a top occupying power in Iraq, naturally to weaken the pope's hinterland. Or how then, of all times, the campaign against the Catholic Church and the pedophilia was started, which was, of course, totally justified, but at this point in time was definitely a tit-for-tat response.' Vollmer found it somehow strange that the US presidents traveled to the Vatican despite the 'tough power struggles'."...

I guess if you're in Europe these days it can be difficult to understand that not every bit of movement in society is government generated.

China and the Middle East

Here are two interesting articles at the Middle East Forum that I finally got around to reading. They serve as a sort of point-counter-point to each other on the degree to which we need to be concerned about China as an increasingly engaged player.

The first, by AEI scholar Dan Blumenthal, Providing Arms, points up a number of disturbing data points, such as:

...Beijing considers its Achilles' heel to be a U.S. naval blockade. So far as Chinese tacticians are concerned, an Iranian anti-ship cruise missile capability able to erode U.S. naval superiority provides insurance. The naval facilities that China is constructing along the Straits of Malacca and Hormuz—and a well-equipped, compliant Iran—exploit the greatest weakness of the U.S. Navy: the challenge of operating in the littoral environment where large ships are especially vulnerable to missiles. Chinese efforts to bolster the Islamic Republic's anti-ship missile capability continue. Recently, Jane's Defence Weekly reported that China is producing several classes of tactical guided missiles – the JJ/TL-6b and 10A, the KJ/TL-10B and a new variant of the C-107 anti-ship missile, specifically for Iran.[7]...

Not comforting.

Then there's this, Energy First, by Jin Liangxiang - a research fellow at Shanghai Institute for International Studies who's theme seems to be, "No need to fear, China and America's interests are really one and the same." I somehow find it less than soothing, especially as it's emanating from a Chinese institution, but hey, worth consideration I guess.

Monday, April 11, 2005

'Jewish MP pelted with eggs at war memorial'

[Update: This link at IsraellyCool makes me less sympathetic to MP King, although it does not mean anything with regard to the egg-tossing thugs.]

Speaking of things in the olde country (hat tip: Daily Scorecard):

Telegraph: Jewish MP pelted with eggs at war memorial

The campaign for what promises to be one of the most bitterly contested parliamentary seats got off to an explosive start yesterday when the MP Oona King was pelted with eggs and vegetables as she attended a memorial to Jewish war dead.

Miss King, 37, the black Jewish Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, was attacked as she joined mourners to commemorate 60 years since the Hughes Mansions Disaster, when 134 people, almost all Jewish, were killed by the last V2 missile to land on London.

The eggs missed her, but one hit a war veteran, Louis Lewis, 89, in the chest and an onion struck Richard Brett, a bugler from the Jewish Lads and Girls Brigade who sounded the Last Post at the ceremony.

Miss King, who enraged many of her Muslim constituents when she openly supported the war in Iraq, told the crowd that the attack was one of the "saddest" things she had ever witnessed.

Clearly angry, she said: "I think they were aimed at me but the sheer ignorance never mind the lack of respect is shocking. They have no idea where their freedom came from and who gave it to them...


Continue reading "'Jewish MP pelted with eggs at war memorial'"

British Academic anti-Semitism Watch

I have no idea how important or influential this National Union of Students is, but this speech was forwarded to me, and is certainly of interest given all that's going on on British (and American) campuses. I would love to have more detail on the events that led to this decision.

Resignation speech of Jewish members of the National Union of Students Executive committee at National Union of Students conference

Conference,

I want five minutes, and I need silence.

Some of you still remember five years ago at my first conference when I stood front and centre as a student having to address the floor after being spat at because I was Jewish. I was unanimously supported and applauded. Not one person stayed seated. I mistakenly believed I had a place in my national union.

Some of you may remember five, four, three and two years ago, when Jewish students had to be escorted from the building by the back door for fear of their safety.

Conference, this year, I have seen Jews accused of conspiring to write, submit and debate motions we had no part in, by full time members of the NEC.

This year, I have suffered baseless accusations of NUS being pro-Jewish and therefore biased because I tackled antisemitism where it stood. There was no defence of Jewish students by NEC members who heard those claims. This year, a comment was made in a Student Union meeting saying that burning down a synagogue is a rational act; when asked to comment NEC members could not even bring themselves to condemn that statement.

Over five months ago serious complaints were lodged about antisemitic comments made by an NEC member in a public meeting; there is yet to be any form of official response to these complaints.

When it was rumoured that I, a Jewish student, was standing for the NUS Presidency - whispers of antisemitism were used as a political football. Conference, while I accuse no one of antisemitism, this year NUS has been a bystander to Jew Hatred. In the past three days, at the heart of our democratic union, to my horror, I have seen the events of the year replayed...

Continue reading in the extended entry.

Continue reading "British Academic anti-Semitism Watch"

Friday, April 8, 2005

Blind Prophecy

In an entry below, I posted about a new effort, the Judeo-Christian Alliance, "Fighting for Israel and Human Rights in the Middle East" and currently examining and opposing the divestment efforts of the Presbyterian Church (USA).

I have just finished reading Dexter Van Zile's 37-page report (available at the site) on the PC(USA)'s efforts and I must say I am very impressed. I strongly recommend taking the time to read this report if you have even the slightest interest. Don't let the length put you off. It's an easy, double-spaced read. Van Zile has done a superb job of exposing the many flaws in the PC(USA)'s position, and the points he makes are highly useful and highly informative not just for those interested in the actions of the Presbyterian Church, but for anyone trying to understand issues of Middle East peace, fair criticism of Israeli actions and Dhimmitude generally - all from a Christian perspective. Why do some Christians, in spite of their own obvious persecution by Islamist forces, choose to blame Israel instead? What is Palestinian Christianity and what is wrong with that? What is the hierarchy of the PC(USA) missing, and what are they not informing their denomination about?

Download Van Zile's thoughtful, heavily footnoted report and see.

Pollard calls out Lord Ahmed

Last week I posted a link to Stephen Pollard's blog here: British anti-Semitism Watch - to a post in which Pollard noted the invitation of notorious anti-Semite Israel Shamir to address the British House of Lords. Pollard wrote about the issue in yesterday's Times of London. Here is the link to the piece at Pollard's blog, as I believe the links to the Times have a tendency to go stale.

Lord Ahmed's unwelcome guest

...The gist of Shamir/Jermas’s speech at the meeting can be gleaned from its title, “Jews and the Empire”. It included observations such as: “All the (political) parties are Zionist-infiltrated.” “Your newspapers belong to Zionists . . . Jews indeed own, control and edit a big share of mass media, this mainstay of Imperial thinking.” “In the Middle East we have just one reason for wars, terror and trouble — and that is Jewish supremacy drive . . . in Iraq, the US and its British dependency continue the same old fight for ensuring Jewish supremacy in the Middle East.” “The Jews like an Empire . . . This love of Empire explains the easiness Jews change their allegiance . . . Simple minds call it ‘treacherous behaviour’, but it is actually love of Empire per se.” “Now, there is a large and thriving Muslim community in England . . . they are now on the side of freedom, against the Empire, and they are not afraid of enforcers of Judaic values, Jewish or Gentile. This community is very important in order to turn the tide.”

Why would Lord Ahmed have hosted such a man in the Lords?...

...If, however, Lord Ahmed does feel that he made a mistake in inviting him, he has yet to demonstrate it. Shamir/Jermas’s speech was made nearly two months ago. On learning of its contents, I wrote to Lord Ahmed, asking him two questions. Did he consider the invitation to have been a mistake? Did he condemn the remarks? He did not reply.

Yesterday, I phoned him. When I told him that I planned to write a piece drawing attention to his actions in hosting Shamir/Jermas and that I wanted to give him every opportunity to respond, he replied: “I am not even going to speak with you.” He then put the phone down...

(via Israellycool)

Given the enormous reported anti-Americanism in Turkey...

It looks like the Administration is batting its eyes at Greece.

Washington Times: Greece identifies with U.S.

NICOSIA, Cyprus -- Greece sees itself as the linchpin of U.S. policy in the Balkans and the Middle East in what officials in Athens describe as a "new chapter" in ties with Washington.

The conservative government of Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis has promised to adapt itself to U.S. policy affecting the area "as far as possible," and Athens has offered to host an international conference to promote peace in the Middle East...[Hopefully Mikis Theodorakis will not be part of the Greek delegation. -Sol]

...When Mr. Molyviatis was in Washington, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice described Greece as America's "best friend in the Balkans." In Athens, Mr. Zoellick referred to Greece as "a strategic partner" in efforts to promote democracy in the Middle East and the Balkans.

Greek officials think that an improvement in Greek-American relations and the setting of common goals coincides with what they perceive as a chill in Washington's attitude toward Turkey, a traditional rival of Greece.

Last month, Turkish media bristled over a claim of U.S. support for Kurdish nationalists and Turkey's general opposition to Washington's policies in Iraq. At the same time, a best-seller in Turkey was "Metal Storm," a novel about an imaginary U.S. invasion of Turkey...


Spirit of America in Lebanon

I almost forgot to put up a pointer to Michael Totten's blogging the Spirit of America efforts in Lebanon. The blog is here. Go have a look. Very interesting.

Did Spain sell WMD to Venezuela?

It's a little early to know what to make of the whole thing, but Spanish blogger Franco Aleman is keeping an eye on it.

...This is an extremely serious issue, which so far has been virtually ignored by the Spanish press, focused on the boats and planes controversy. No mainstream media have covered this, and I only found three articles via Google News on small local newspapers...Interestingly, without reporting on the exact date of the deal, all three blame the Aznar administration for the sale that took place during the first semester of 2004, although Zapatero took office on April 17th. That is, the semester was virtually split in two near-identical halfs, the first one with Aznar as PM and the second with Zapatero.

I still don't have solid information about the date, but I'd be willing to bet that it was under Zapatero. Why I'm saying this? Well, first because after all Zapatero has been getting cozy with Chavez since day 1, and, actually accused Aznar of supporting the 2002 coup that briefly ousted him...


American YWCA backs away from anti-israel statements

The American branches of some international organizations seem to be the occasional and only voices of sanity in an insane world. The International Committee of the Red Cross has blocked recognition of Israel's Magen Dovid Adom (Red Star of David - guess why) for years over the objections of the American Red Cross. Now the American branch of the YWCA, after first failing to do so, has repudiated the world body in its comparison of Israel to...where else?...Nazi Germany.

See: JPost: American YWCA rejects Israel=Nazi document

The American branch of the Young Women's Christian Association has formally rejected a document written by one if its senior officials that equated Israelis with Hitler.

Doris Pagelkopf, vice president of the World YWCA and the American representative on the World YWCA board, made the inflammatory comment in a "witness report" to the international organization following a Middle East tour last spring.

"I strongly felt the correlation to World War II. During that war Hitler tried to exterminate the Jews and now a group of Israelis... is trying to choke off and rid the land of Palestinians," she wrote.

Although the comment was excluded from the official report, it generated much opposition, both within the movement and without.

In March, Pagelkopf told The Jerusalem Post that she regretted any hurt her report had caused.

At the annual meeting of its national coordinating board over the weekend, YWCA USA made it clear that the comment did not reflect its organizational perspective...

Also, ADL Commends YWCA USA for Dissenting from World Body's Anti-Israel Report

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today praised the YWCA USA for publicly stating that it does not endorse the "June 2004 Witness Report to Palestine," in which the author equated Israeli actions to Hitler's extermination of six million Jews during World War II.

"We commend the YWCA for publicly stating that it does not endorse the outrageous and offensive views expressed in the 2004 report," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. "Absolutely no comparison can be made between the complex Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the atrocities committed by the Nazis against the Jews. This is a charge that is purposefully directed at Jews in an effort to associate the victims of the Nazi's crimes with the Nazi perpetrators, and serves to diminish the significance and uniqueness of the Holocaust."...

Chicago Journal Profiles Klocek Case

Klocek himself might not be saying much, but his lawyer sure is.

Free speech under fire at DePaul

...Kloceck, who has been working on his PhD at the University of Chicago while teaching, felt his free speech had been violated and sought out a lawyer, John Mauck, who specializes in First Amendment and free-speech issues. Since then, the matter has received attention nationally on conservative talk radio and the New York Post, but not much in the local news.

Mauck said he decided to take the case after reading an October 8 letter from Dumbleton printed in the school's newspaper, The DePaulia, after Dumbleton advised Klocek not to speak to the press. Mauck took particular umbrage at a passage that focused on the content of Klocek's speech rather than his conduct toward the students:

“No students anywhere should ever have to be concerned they will be verbally attacked for their religious belief or their ethnicity,” Dumbleton wrote. “No one should ever use the role of teacher to demean the ideas of others or insist on the absoluteness of an opinion, much less press erroneous assertions.”

Says Mauck, “That’s what got me going,” he said. “This was about content, not conduct.”...

The whole story is here.

Previous entries on the DePaul issue here, here, here, here and here.

'Katsav greets Syrian, Iranian leaders at Pope's funeral'

[Note: Be sure to read the update at the bottom.]

I wonder if their respective delegations gave them a hard time later? 'You have cooties!'

Still, an interesting development. I wonder what Katsav and Kahtami talked about.

Haaretz: Katsav greets Syrian, Iranian leaders at Pope's funeral

President Moshe Katsav, who was at the Vatican as part of Israel's delegation to the funeral of Pope John Paul II, twice shook hands with Syrian President Bashar Assad on Friday.

The two men were in close proximity to one another throughout the procession due to the fact that the Israel and Syrian delegations to the funeral were positioned next to one another.

At the conclusion of funeral services, the Iranian-born Katsav also shook hands with President Mohammad Khatami. The two spoke for almost an hour in Farsi.

Katsav also reportedly embraced Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika.

Also at the Vatican, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom met with his Moroccan counterpart Mohammed Ben-Issa.

Shalom's wife, Judy Shalom-Nir-Mozes, presented Britain's Prince Charles with a talisman from prominent spiritual leader Rabbi Kadouri on the occasion of his upcoming marriage to longtime girlfriend Camilla Parker-Bowles.

Unless that talisman were in the shape of a paper-bag, I doubt it will do much good. Ouch! I kid, I kid.

Update: Haaretz has changed the story at the link above. Now it reads [see extended entry]:

Continue reading "'Katsav greets Syrian, Iranian leaders at Pope's funeral'"

Thursday, April 7, 2005

'Jews and Christians Blast Presbyterian anti-Israel Policy'

This is a press release that was just forwarded to me. Dexter Van Zile has been at the forefront of the internal Christian dialogue opposing the divestment activities of the PC(USA), and he has the knowledge and ability to approach the issue using Church philosophy that many of us on the "outside" are only dimly aware of. The internet is gone haywire for me at the moment, so I can't get into the site to read the report, but I look forward to doing so. It's also good to see the David Project (the tenacious David Project) keeping on this issue.

Jews and Christians Blast Presbyterian anti-Israel Policy
New report says PC(USA) is megaphone for PLO

The Judeo-Christian Alliance, an initiative of the Boston-based David Project, today released its in-depth critique of the Presbyterian Church(USA)'s decision to divest from Israel. The report, Blind Prophecy, documents the process that led to church to offer a one-sided anti-Israel narrative to Presbyterians in the U.S.

Citing the Barmen Declaration, written by German theologians fighting the Nazi takeover of Christian churches in the 1930's, Dexter Van Zile, the author of the report, says proponents of divestment should have subjected the Palestinian Christian narrative to more scrutiny.

"By broadcasting this narrative, the PC(USA) did not speak in a prophetic voice, but allowed itself to be used as a megaphone for the Palestinian nationalist cause," says Van Zile. "We've seen Christian churches used this way before and the results were catastrophic."

"The Barmen Declaration is included in the PC(USA)'s Book of Confessions," he says. "The warnings are there in black and white, but for some reason, they were ignored by people who knew better."

The report also documents efforts by some of the denomination's leaders to misrepresent the meaning of the resolution after it was passed, says Van Zile.

"After the resolution was passed, the denomination's leaders tried to portray the policy as if it punished both Israelis and Palestinians for acts of violence. The resolution did no such thing," Van Zile says.

The 37-page document is available at the Judeo-Christian Alliance web site: (www.judeo-christianalliance.org). Van Zile hopes the document will alert other denominations in the U.S. to the problems with the Palestinian Christian narrative.

"If churches are going to speak prophetically about the Arab/Israeli conflict, they need to listen to more than a narrative produced by Christians living under the threat of Arab terrorism," Van Zile says.

The Judeo-Christian Alliance is an initiative of the David Project, a group that promotes a fair and honest understanding of conflict in the Middle East. The JCA was founded to give Christians in the U.S. the information they need to act with an informed conscience about the Arab/Israeli conflict.

Hero Machine

Not your average Middle Eastern leader

That according to this post by neo-neocon about newly selected Kurdish President of Iraq, Jalal Talabani.

Talabani, the Kurds, and the Jews

...According to Rubin's article, written before the Iraq war that deposed Saddam, many Kurds were already expressing approval of Israel and studying the country as a model for their own autonomy and liberation. Victims of persecution and genocide themselves, they could identify. What's more, they despised the Palestinians for their support of Saddam. The older generation of Kurds remembered the absent Iraqi Kurdish Jews fondly, and even the younger generation were able to listen to Israeli radio, watch Israeli TV, and access Israeli websites, unlike the inhabitants of the rest of Iraq...

More here.

British Boycott

Melanie Phillips on the continuing discussion amongst British academics to boycott their colleagues who may or may not disagree with them:

The monstrous regiment of university teachers

If anyone had ever told British academics that there would come a time when they would punish colleagues because of the views they held, and would treat them as pariahs and try to destroy their livelihoods in order to intimidate others into toeing the sole approved political line, they would have been incredulous. In the western tradition the universities are, after all, the custodians of free intellectual inquiry and open debate. Censorship, suppression of ideas and intellectual intimidation are associated with totalitarian regimes which attempt to coerce people into the approved way of thinking.

Yet that is what is now happening in British universities -- and the pariah is, of course, Israel. As the Guardian reported yesterday, the Association of University Teachers is about to debate a proposed boycott of Israeli academics who refuse to denounce their government's policies in the occupied territories. But the motion will 'exclude "conscientious Israeli academics and intellectuals opposed to their state's colonial and racist policies".' So in true totalitarian tradition, those who denounce their own will be permitted to have a livelihood. Gee, thanks! To survive in the cradle of free expression, Israelis will have to betray their own people. This is a natural development from the implicit -- and sometimes explicitly stated -- assumption that has been coursing through British intellectual circles in the current hate-fest against Israel, that only those British Jews who denounce Israel's policies can be considered to be British; anyone who supports Israel is guilty of 'dual loyalty'.

This requirement to denounce Israel as the price of continued social acceptance is doubly disgusting...

Worth reading in full.

Wednesday, April 6, 2005

That's what you get for making peace

Israelis are reinforcing the roofs of their schools as the Gaza withdrawal comes closer and more towns come into rocket-range. But wait, removing the "occupation" means less violence, right?

IMRA: Israel preparing Ashkelon for post-disengagement rocket attacks

Israel Television Channel Two News reported this evening that Israel is preparing for the rocket attacks that are expected to hit Ashkelon after Israel withdraws from the Gaza Strip.

The radar system for tracking incoming rockets and loudspeaker system so that the public can be warned to take cover a few seconds before the rockets slam into the city are already being installed. In addition, the roofs of school buildings are being reinforced.

It was not clear from the report as to what measures will protect the strategic targets located in Ashkelon (tank farms, etc.).

It should be noted that the expectation of rocket attacks against Ashkelon after the withdrawal was presented in the same tone as a report on preparations for bad weather (inevitable).


Anti-Dhimmitude in Scottsdale

(via LGF) This story is actually about a month old, as I posted about here (original item here), but this article is interesting, as it shows that speaking out does help.

By the way, the problem wasn't just the "focus" on Islam, it was that the book was just flat bad history.

AP: History book removed as parents complain about Islam focus

SCOTTSDALE - A world history textbook is no longer being used by seventh-graders at a local school amid criticism of the book's focus and portrayal of Islam.

The book, "History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond," was being used on a trial basis at Scottsdale's Mohave Middle School.

The removal came shortly after angry e-mails to the school district and entries on conservative Web logs...


Continue reading "Anti-Dhimmitude in Scottsdale"

Tuesday, April 5, 2005

Richard Landes and Pallywood

Last Thursday evening I attended a presentation given by Boston University Professor Richard Landes. The subject concerned the ways in which the Palestinian Arabs manipulate the foreign media - often with the foreign media's cooperation. The focus of the presentation was, of course, on the Muhammed al Durra hoax, and included large quantities of the unedited video from that day.

I saw Professor Landes give this presentation once before, and reported on it at length last September here: Truth is Essential - "The Mideast Conflict Through the Eyes of the Media" Report. Since that time, the al Durra hoax has begun to become accepted as such in an increasing number of places, and France 2 - the French media outlet primarily responsible for the slander - is very much on the defensive. Landes now has a much-improved and far more professional DVD set-up of his video, and the event was taped for use by CAMERA. I won't bother going into detail here again, you can read my previous piece, as well as CAMERA's extensive al Durra (or al Dura) backgrounder here for a timeline and explanation of the scandal. All the same issues of mainstream media refusing to be critical of Arab claims, holding Israel to a different standard and not being particularly interested in objective truth remain the same.

Clearly, the more "slicked up" DVD presentation is something that's being prepared for release, and this is very exciting - not just because of the way it exposes this particular scandal, but the way it will cause people to re-examine everything they see in television media. It's very important stuff.

Landes also gave us a sneak-peak of his new web project, 21st Century Media Group. It's passworded now but should be open to the public next month. Trust me, it looks slick inside. Hopefully the content will match the gloss. He plans on presenting raw video footage from media sources in order to get people to re-examine what they're being shown - starting somewhat generically, then, once people understand how badly images in the Arab/Israeli conflict are manipulated ("once they learn how to see"), moving into the specific case of the al Dura incident. In the future, as material becomes available, he will move into other areas and issues as well. It will not be limited to the Middle East, but will, if I recall correctly, be about media accountability and re-examination.

I didn't post this right away as I was hoping to couple this description with an interview with Professor Landes. I think it would be a very interesting one, but he hasn't responded to my email. If anyone knows the professor, please tell him I don't bite, and doing a blog interview can't hurt him. I have offered to do the exchange by either an email exchange - and then reassembling the pieces into a "simulated interview" - or going to see him tape recorder in hand to do it the old fashioned way. So if any of my readers knows him, give 'im a nudge. I'm sure he's a busy guy, but I'm also sure he could spare a few minutes to get the word out!

Spirit of America - Fostering Democracy in Beirut

Michael Totten writes about his trip to Beirut to kick off Spirit of America's new drive. Here's from there:

Help the people of Lebanon win their independence

Support pro-democracy demonstrators in Beirut’s “tent city” and keep attention on Lebanon’s struggle for freedom.

Lebanon is at an historic crossroads. It has been under foreign occupation for more than a generation. But, as the result of pro-democracy demonstrations in Beirut, free elections and independence are now within Lebanon’s reach. The focal point of these demonstrations is a “tent city” where pro-democracy demonstrators representing many different religions and political groups have united to form a permanent presence until Lebanon wins its independence.

The tent city demonstrators keep the pressure on for political change, and they maintain world attention on the struggle for Lebanese independence. Your donation will support a new free and democratic Lebanon.

What does your donation buy?
Your donation will support the tent city demonstrators by supplying food, water, shelter and other basic needs. For example:
$1,000 pays for 200 blankets.
$300 pays for 200 meals.
$80 pays for 200 red & white scarves.

Use of funds
We are a 501c3 nonprofit and your donation is tax deductible. 100% of all donations to this project (net of bank transaction processing fees) will be provided to Lebanese organizations in Lebanon for the local purchase of food, water, shelter and other items to support the pro-democracy demonstrators in the "tent city" at Martyrs' Square in Beirut.

We do not deduct fees or expenses for organization overhead. Those expenses are funded separately...

Donations can be made here. (Even a $5 donation is welcome.)

Speaking Out For Klocek

The DePaul Administration is getting its talking points in order. Their Director of Media Relations, Robin Florzak, wrote a letter in to "The Post" - a student-run paper at Ohio University - excoriating the paper for a previous article they had run. The themes sounded are very similar to those sounded by the university president's letter posted previously - namely, that the issue is not academic freedom, but the professor's behavior.

There's a hopeful aspect here. Professor Klocek has what very few people, particularly students, have - a colleague willing to speak out on his behalf.

Here is Robin Florzak's piece, with Professor Cohen's response following:

Professor's critic grossly ill-informed

I was disappointed to read Daniel Hiester's U-Wire column that ran in The Post on March 28 ("Political discussions need to be leveled").

Since neither Hiester nor the syndicated columnist he cites in his piece called DePaul University to check their facts, the author erroneously characterized the incident involving DePaul instructor Thomas Klocek as a matter of academic freedom...


Continue reading "Speaking Out For Klocek"

Best Post on "Conservatism" Ever

My label, not the author's. Maybe only a slight exageration, and actually it's meant as a post on Same-Sex Marriages - but the post is so good on that that the thought-process expressed stretches across issues.

Read Jane Galt's post (if you haven't already) here. (via Undercaffeinated)

The Pulitzer Prize

The blogosphere is in an uproar with righteous indignation over the Pulitzer for Breaking News Photography. The winners are all on this page...clearly the AP and the Pulitzer Committee believe a concerted effort to display American troops in a bad light is prize-worthy. Surreal. Rusty says that two of the photos are "positive" - one of an American soldier with a GI Joe in his pack, and one of American troops praying. I say that those are not, taken in this context and company - the AP's intent with printing them and the Committee's with nominating them - intended as complimentary.

As you will see as you surf the issue, the Pulitzer Committee has in some cases rewarded people who run with terrorists. Just shocking.

For more reaction and analysis also see Riding Sun, Michelle Malkin, Power Line and many others.

One thing is certain, the journalism profession has "elevated" itself outside the bounds of normal responsible morality. Whatever they do to "get the shot" - to the point of conveying the terrorists' point of view and then rewarding themselves for it - is acceptable.

Hanan Ashrawi at Yale - "Bombing in New Haven"

And it sounds as though that's a good thing. Former Arafat advisor Hanan Ashrawi spoke last night at Yale. Here are a couple of emails that were forwarded to me (the portions I chose to re-print are left unedited) written by people who were there. Interesting. Sounds like "terror's mistress" is cooling off in her old age.

...the fact remains, that this was not the same Ashwari who last appeared in New Haven in 2003 at SCSU, when she made such "bully pulpit" comments like "sucide bombers are the equivalent of a poor man's F-16" and when asked abot "honor killings" hurrumphed and said "thats a typical Israeli question."

None of that this time. In fact we noted that not a few of her erstwhile supporters walked out mid speech because, as you will see in [someone else's] observations below-no sturm and drang was present.

In fact Ashwari admitted that her correligionists, Chrisitians in the PA have fled-reducing their proportion from 20 to 2% and she wouldn't like to see the Chrisitian presence turn"churches into Museums." The reality is as she inferred in her remarks was that Islamization in the PA was taking it's toll on the Chrsitian presence. She was also candid about internal threats like fractionalism, terrorists being politicized and seeking control of the Palestinian legislative council and the weakness of the Abbas leadership in wrassling the 14 security services into a unifed one. Given the comment in the Jersualem Post below by a Muslim Arab, Ashwari had every reason to be subdued and not triumphant. Because even she had to admit that Sharon had trumped her and her fellow Palestinian peaceniks with the April 14, 2004 letter from Bush about certain realities on the ground. She also admitted as much that the US wants to see evidence of security, de-militiarization of the terror groups in the PA and eradication of the corruption by the kleptos-including Abbas, I would imagine, but maybe not.

Ashwari deflated the left radical secularists in the Levinson auditorium by not supporting a bi-national state solution: two states is okay as long as the 1967 "Auschwitz" borders are adhered to, the settement outposts are rolled back and Res. 191- dealing with rights of Palestinian refugee return are adhered to. But even she held out the fig leaf of a choice between return and "compensation," after Israel recognizes its role in "al Naqbah." Never happen...

Here's more (in the extended entry):

Continue reading "Hanan Ashrawi at Yale - "Bombing in New Haven""

Missing Anthrax

One of the theories about at least some of Saddam's missing WMD's was that perhaps Saddam himself was mislead by his underlings about the existence of the stuff. That seems to be the case here (although, amazingly, or not if you've been keeping abreast of the AP's spin, this AP report tries to make it into an American lie).

Rashid Taha says she dumped the anthrax near one of Saddam's palaces back in 1991, but couldn't tell him for fear of his wrath for having sone so. I guess that's one of those draw-backs of running a fear society - you can never trust what your underlings are on about.

Iraqi Anthrax Scientist Kept Her Secret

In early 2003, as war fever built in Washington, an Iraqi scientist faced a fateful choice.

Rihab Rashid Taha could try to lower the heat by finally telling U.N.inspectors what happened to Iraq's "missing" anthrax.

Or she could remain silent, rather than risk Saddam Hussein's wrath.

The microbiologist's dilemma, she has told U.S. interrogators, was that her team 12 years earlier had destroyed the lethal bacteria by dumping it practically at the gates of one of Saddam's main palaces, and the feared Iraqi despot might grow enraged at news of anthrax on his doorstep.

Taha chose silence in 2003, thus stoking suspicions of those who contended Iraq still harbored biological weapons. Soon thereafter, two years ago this month, the United States invaded.

"Whether those involved understood the significance and disastrous consequences of their actions is unclear," the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group says of Taha and colleagues in its final report on Iraq weapons-hunting.

"These efforts demonstrate the problems that existed on both sides in establishing the truth."...


British Academic Boycott Against Israel Still Alive and "Well"

Or should that be "ill." Attention MESA: Look, politics in the classroom!

Guardian: Boycott call resurfaces

...In recent weeks, the foundation has received two rejections from British academics to review an application. In one, received last month, the unnamed academic describes his "utmost respect" for the academic whose grant he's been asked to review, but refuses on the basis that it is Israeli money and he disapproves of their government's actions towards the Palestinian people. "I hope you understand this is nothing personal," he adds.

The second, also received last month, again says the author won't review the proposal. "I support the academic boycott of Israeli academic institutions, as a means of registering my protest against Israelis' lack of respect for human rights and continuing illegal occupation of Palestinian land."

Almost three years ago to the day, moves towards an academic boycott of Israel began in earnest when a moratorium on European funding for Israeli research was suggested by Steven and Hilary Rose and 120 other academics, in a letter to the Guardian. The issue has burst on to the front pages intermittently: when Umist's Mona Baker sacked two Israeli linguists from a translation journal she edited; when Oxford's Andrew Wilkie refused a place to an Israeli PhD student; and last year, when the School of Oriental and African Studies hosted a conference on the subject entitled Resisting Israeli Apartheid: Strategies and Principles...

...Blackwell says that over the past three years the boycott has been as active as ever, but on a quiet and individual level - "a covert boycott where people are quietly getting on with it. It's a passive boycott that dares not speak its name"...

Of all the countries in the world, with all the objectionable governmental policies, it's Israel they choose to boycott - playing politics in an iron-fisted manner they wouldn't do with any other country on any other issue, but if you suggest that there's an element of Judenhass involved, they will scream to high-heaven that you are trying to stiffle the debate - these people who want to cut off all contact will scream that it's you who are trying to stiffle the debate.

Warning labels for biased news articles?

Concerned Presbyterians

Here is a link to the web site of a group of Presbyterians who are concerned with the manner in which the leadership of PC(USA) has outrun the membership on a number of political issues, including the divestment issue. Here is a link to the divestment-related posts on their blog.

Via the comments to this post.

Monday, April 4, 2005

"The UN will get the US ambassador it has plainly earned."

Yes sir. So says Captain Ed concerning the nomination of John Bolton while pointing to this Times story about this letter signed by "Seventy-six leading security policy practitioners" endorsing the Bolton nomination to UN Ambassador.

From the letter:

...Some retired diplomats suggest that Secretary Bolton's positions on various controversial arms control treaties should disqualify him from serving at the UN. Their criticism is misdirected. Mr. Bolton's views about each of these accords are identical to those of President Bush. While the signatories are certainly free to oppose the Administration's positions, their differences seem to be with a man twice elected by the American people to design and execute security policies, rather than with one of his most effective and articulate officials in advancing those policies.

We believe, moreover, that the Bush Administration's stances on such treaties reflect a clear-eyed assessment of the real limits of diplomacy with nations that do not honor their commitments, that deliberately conceal their activities so as to defeat verification and that seek to use bilateral and multilateral agreements as instruments of asymmetric warfare against nations like the United States that abide by their treaty obligations. Far from being a disqualifier, this view is an eminently sensible and responsible one in light of past experience.

In short, Secretary Bolton's formidable grasp of the issues of the day, his exemplary previous service to our country and the confidence President Bush reposes in him will make him an outstanding and highly effective representative to the United Nations...

Says Captain Ed:

...The United Nations is a disgrace. The US should not send someone to Turtle Bay that would make the current corrupt and incompetent regime comfortable. We need to make them as uncomfortable as possible. John Bolton will not shrink from that task, and he will demand that any UN-negotiated treaties and sanctions carry verification and substantial penalties for failure. Had the UN not transformed itself into the League of Nations for the past fourteen years and allowed the permanent members of the Security Council to be bought off with Iraqi oil futures, then Bolton's nomination would not be necessary. The UN will get the US ambassador it has plainly earned.

Yes.

The Scandal in Canada

I don't know if you've been following this - I haven't seen a word in my admitedly brief glimpses at the American news of late. No surprise, as it involves potentially massive corruption by the ruling Canadian (and anti-Bush) party. Captain's Quarters has been all over it, and if you're a Canadian, American blogs are the only place you're going to find out any of the emerging details.

Read CQ starting here. Also see here and here.

The C-Span Lipstadt Broadcast - Updated

C-Span went ahead and broadcast their Lipstadt/Irving show yesterday. (Prior posts here and here.)

Lipstadt herself did not appear, although they did use clips of she and Irving (appearing separately).

The video of the show is here. Lipstadt comments on the broadcast on her blog here.

Washington Post reporter T.R. Reid was the only live voice, and he effectively poo-poo'd Irving and the clips that were shown of him - although I believe he was woefully naive on the "balance" issue.

Update: I shorted this earlier because I did not have much time. Of course you cannot simply toss both sides out there on equal time and leave it up to the marketplace of ideas to sort out truth from fiction in a one hour program - even without commercials. It is irresponsible to put a truth-teller up against someone who has no qualms about lying with a straight face and expect even an above-average audience to sort out the truth from fiction. First of all, neither side has the time necessary to truly craft their case, nor would most people have the attention-span to focus on it even if they did. The trial took months and the issues cannot possibly be done justice to in a one hour program. Further, most people do not have the resources at hand, nor the ability at hand to fact and context-check every claim. Holocaust-deniers are masters of twisting the truth to form wholely new creations.

Given two reasonable-sounding cases, and little but the presentations themselves to recommend either, many well-meaning people will find themselves being drawn somewhere toward the center - the fallacy of the golden mean is a particularly seductive one.

Think of some controversial issue of which you are somewhat expert but that can easily be misunderstood and the public mislead when presented by someone you know to have a fringe view. Think of some court case or some disagreement you've had in which you know you were 100% right given someone taking the time to really sit down and examine your case, and how dangerous and frustrating it is if they don't - how easily a false impression can result from too little information gleaned too casually.

I find it hard to believe that T.R. Reid wouldn't grasp this. I think, however, he does, and when he says that Irving should be heard, and that Lipstadt was wrong for not agreeing to appear with him, he really means that it would have been OK - they would have presented Irving and then someone like he would have been there to give the nudge-nudge on who to believe (as happened on the show as presented) - that's the newsman's version of the marketplace of ideas...we'll present both sides - sort of - and then slant things so it's clear who the reader or viewer is expected to be sympathetic to.

C-Span claims that they weren't going to do this (present both sides equally, or stage some sort of "debate"), but it doesn't sound like they let Deborah Lipstadt know that, and C-Span has a reputation for hands-off play of "both sides" equally (although not usually on BookTV).

LA Times: Abbas Shakes Up Security - Updated

LA Times: Abbas Shakes Up Security

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas accepted the resignation of a top security chief Saturday and ordered hundreds of senior security officers to retire in a bid to reform his forces and halt violence, an official said.

Abbas, who took office Jan. 15 after the death last year of longtime Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, has been under pressure from Israel and Washington to impose law and order in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Israel and the United States have demanded that the Palestinians streamline their corruption-plagued security forces, which under Arafat ballooned into nearly a dozen branches with often overlapping authorities and rivalries. The Palestinian Authority has 45,000 to 50,000 security officers on its payroll.

"We will not allow anyone to take the law into his own hands and sabotage our situation," Abbas said, criticizing the security services.

"I want to distinguish between nationalists and criminals," Abbas said in remarks broadcast on Palestinian television. "The security apparatus did not perform its duty, so it was crucial to take a stand," he added, in his most blunt criticism yet of the forces...

Update:

See, now here's part of the problem when you turn the lawless into heroes, it makes it very difficult to crack down on them:

JPost: Analysis: Honeymoon over for Abbas by Khaled Abu Toameh

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's decision to fire Haj Ismail Jaber, commander of the National Security Forces in the West Bank, has done little to allay the fears of this city's residents.

Jaber, a longtime ally of Yasser Arafat, was sacked after he refused carry out Abbas's order to arrest the Fatah gunmen who rioted in the city last week, shooting at the Mukata compound and damaging several restaurants and shops. During a meeting with Abbas, Jaber warned that were he to have intervened, this would have triggered street battles between his men and the gunmen, with many casualties.

Both Abbas and the ousted security chief are aware that the use of drastic measures against the gunmen, most of whom are wanted by Israel, would play into the hands of their rivals, who would depict them as "collaborators." ...


Continue reading "LA Times: Abbas Shakes Up Security - Updated"

Sunday, April 3, 2005

Fighters?

Is it actually more controversial to just call the "insurgent" forces in Iraq by what they are - terrorists?

Washington Post: Fighters Target Abu Ghraib in Major Assault

BAGHDAD, April 2 -- Insurgents assailed Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison on Saturday, launching waves of car bombs, rockets and gunfire in an hours-long onslaught that wounded 18 American GIs and 12 detainees, the U.S. military said.

The attackers apparently did not penetrate the prison grounds, although some inmates were reported to have been seriously wounded. The second of two car bombs exploded as troops were trying to evacuate the injured after the first, the Reuters news agency said.

Meanwhile, the possibility of defusing Iraq's Sunni Muslim-led insurgency by drawing the Sunni minority into the country's government and military appeared more remote...

Oops. Let this be a lesson to you, never look to the big papers (at least not the news section) for any sort of analysis.

On the very same day:

Washington Post: Iraqi Lawmakers Elect Sunni Arab as New Parliament Speaker, Ending Days of Deadlock

Move Breaks Impasse, Launches Shiite, Kurd and Sunni Unity Government

BAGHDAD, April 3 -- An American-educated Sunni Muslim won the first-to-be-filled post of parliament speaker in Iraq's new government on Sunday, breaking a serious impasse and launching a Shiite, Kurd and Sunni unity government more than two months after historic national elections.

Hachim Hasani's election by fellow members of the new parliament began the formation of Iraq's first democratic government in a half-century. Selection followed more than a month of negotiations, and a final week of rancorous finger-pointing, as lawmakers elected on Jan. 30 went about the unfamiliar process of finding a way to share power.

Filling of the first post represented compromises by all sides. Shiites and Sunnis withdrew their own, rival candidates for speaker, and Hasani gave up his hopes of a top Cabinet job to end an impasse over the speakership.

"The Iraqi people have been able to survive many attempts by their enemies to divide the people,'' Hasani told the assembly, invoking a "'free, democratic, federated and pluralistic'' future for Iraq...


Saturday, April 2, 2005

British anti-Semitism Watch

Judith points to this post at Stephen Pollard's - bizarro-world anti-Semite Israel Shamir was invited by Lord Ahmed to speak at the House of Lords in February. Read Pollard's post for the specifics...oh, OK, here are a couple of quotes:

“your newspapers belong to Zionists”

“in Iraq, the US and its British dependency continue the same old fight for ensuring Jewish supremacy in the Middle East…in the Middle East we have just one reason for wars, terror and trouble - and that is Jewish supremacy drive”

“The Jews like an Empire…This love of Empire explains the easiness Jews change their allegiance…Simple minds call it ‘treacherous behaviour’, but it is actually love of Empire per se…”

See here for some links on Shamir.

PCUSA Reconsiders Dismissal of Leaders Who Met With Hezbollah

An emailer points out that on the same day that a fourth Christian area was bombed in Beirut, the Presbyterian Church USA reconsidered the firing of two officials who met with Hezbollah.

ACSWP trip to Middles East, Staff dismissals discussed by GAC; Committee asks reconsideration

LOUISVILLE – Should a Presbyterian delegation that went to the Middle East last fall have met with leaders of Hezbollah? And should two of the denomination’s national staff members who went on the trip have lost their jobs because of that meeting?

The General Assembly Council got right to the brink of discussing that on March 31 – and then went into closed session.

Earlier, the chairperson of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)’s Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy (ACSWP), Nile Harper, had presented a report which said in part that when the PC(USA) dismissed Peter Sulyok, who had been the advisory committee’s coordinator, that dismissal “was carried out without a just cause or appropriate due process.”

Kathy Lueckert, the council’s deputy executive director, also lost her job in the fallout from the Hezbollah meeting.

The advisory committee encouraged the council to reconsider its personnel policies, which allowed the council’s executive director, John Detterick, to end Lueckert and Sulyok’s employment by “unilateral action,” according to the report...

A glimpse into the PCUSA's scales of justice:

...Two Presbyterians who made the 15-day fact-finding trip in October described some of what they’d seen and experienced – including the difficulty caused to the Palestinian people by Israel’s construction of a security barrier that’s intended to reduce suicide bombings but also is separating some Palestinians from their land, jobs and community...

On one side, inconvenience - sometimes serious, I'll grant - and on the other, people desperate to prevent themselves from being murdered in their beds and on their buses. And where does PCUSA choose to throw their weight? There really shouldn't be any surprise that people of good will are less than impressed with PCUSA's sense of priorities.

[continued in the extended entry]

Continue reading "PCUSA Reconsiders Dismissal of Leaders Who Met With Hezbollah"

Not Quite Ready

The female Muslim who lead a mixed-gender Mosque prayer a couple of weeks back is now teaching her classes via video-feed out of security concerns.

VCU professor will instruct via video (via Dhimmi Watch)

A Virginia Commonwealth University professor of Islamic studies will be teaching her classes through video conferencing for the remainder of the semester because of concerns for her safety.

Amina Wadud sparked international controversy recently when she led an Islamic prayer service that was attended by both men and women.

Islamic tradition calls for men and women to pray separately. Many Islamic clerics condemned her participation in the service, which was conducted in New York.

A VCU spokeswoman indicated that the decision to move Wadud out of the classroom came after a security review.

Google her name and you'll find a lot of outrage out there. At least one "Islamic scholar" is supportive, but he's got his own problems:

Islamic scholar hails actions of VCU professor - He says Wadud's act is important for Muslim women in America

A Richmond professor who enraged some Middle Eastern Muslims by leading a prayer service attended by both men and women is right on target, says an exiled Egyptian Islamic studies scholar.

Amina Wadud, a professor of Islamic studies at Virginia Commonwealth University, has succeeded in breaking the taboo of the male-dominated mosque, said Nasr Abu Zaid, who fled his home country in 1995. Abu Zaid now teaches at Leiden University in the Netherlands.

"As you break the taboo, you try to bring some new insights to the established tradition. In the eyes of some, when you bring new insights, you are establishing a new tradition," said Abu Zaid, who is Muslim...

...The VCU name on the speaker's lectern was covered with black cloth for the lecture. A VCU spokeswoman said: "We were advised to cover it for security reasons. I'm not able to go into more detail than that." She also said she was not aware of any specific threats.

Plainclothes security officers also were at the lecture. Immediately afterward, VCU security personnel escorted Abu Zaid and his wife to their hotel...

...Abu Zaid identifies with Wadud's plight.

Abu Zaid came under fire in Egypt after suggesting that Islam's holy texts should be interpreted in the historical and linguistic context of their time and that new interpretations should account for social change. Fundamentalists were enraged by his controversial claim that the Quran be interpreted metaphorically rather than literally.

He was charged with heresy and forced from Cairo University, his alma mater, where he was a professor. In 1995, the Cairo Court of Appeals ruled that Abu Zaid had abandoned his Muslim faith and therefore was no longer a Muslim. His life was threatened, and the couple fled from Egypt to the Netherlands.

"Looking at the Quran as a historical text is taken as denying the validity of the Quran, which it does not do. What we need in the Muslim world is to construct a scientific approach to the study of religion," Abu Zaid said.

"Religion is taken as a subject to be believed, not to be studied."

The Pope

I don't have a lot of personal feeling about the Pope one way or the other - I just don't know enough about him as an individual - but one cannot help but be touched by the passing of the spiritual leader of over 1 billion people.

Here's the ADL's release:

Pope John Paul II: An Appreciation
A Visionary Remembered

by Kenneth Jacobson

In his tenure as Pope, John Paul II revolutionized Catholic-Jewish relations. It is safe to say that more change for the better took place in his 27 year Papacy than in the nearly 2000 years before.

One small indicator of the change is an ADL program called Bearing Witness, in which Catholic school teachers from around the country spend a week in Washington with ADL, the Archdiocese of Washington and the Holocaust Museum staff to learn about Anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, and Israel. This and so many other wonderful interfaith activities could never have happened without the remarkable contributions of the Pope who opened so many Catholics to a whole new way of looking at Jews.

The Pope did this by the way he wrote and spoke about the evil of anti-Semitism. He did this by visiting the Rome synagogue, the first Pope to do so. He did it by the opening ten years ago of full relations with the State of Israel and then capped it off with his historic visit to Israel, including a moving stop at the Western wall. He did it by issuing a report on the Holocaust and by raising questions of Christian responsibility.

And in some ways most important, he rejected the destructive concept of supersessionism, the word describing the delegitimization of Judaism which had been superseded by Christianity. This historic delegitimization of Israel, based on the Jewish rejection of Jesus, became the basis of the milennia-old demonization of the Jewish people and the concomitant anti-Semitism. Now, said the Pope, Judaism is recognized as a sister religion of Christianity with intrinsic and eternal value of its own.

The consequences of this remarkable revolution from the top of the Catholic Church have been significant. It doesn't mean that all problems are resolved, far from it. Issues arise all the time, whether it is the baptized Jewish children during World War II who were never returned to their Jewish roots; or the beatification of Pope Pius XII; or Vatican positions on Israeli policy.

But because of the vision, because of the understanding of the suffering associated with Catholic doctrine toward Jews, that the Pope possessed, the prism through which problems are seen is completely different.

For all of us who appreciate the Pope's contributions the challenge is to make sure that his vision will continue to resonate and to deepen. That would be the best tribute to this exceptional religious leader.

Requiescat in Pace

Update: Don't miss PeakTalk's essay and roundup. Very nice:

...Like Reagan, Karol Wojtyla turned conservative values into a progressive revolutionary force. In society, in world politics and in addressing past wrongs he was able to change the course of history and leave a legacy that will be recognized well beyond the Catholic Church and which will inspire Catholics and non-Catholics alike.

The Lonesome Death of Zahra Kazemi

Nick Packwood is damn put-out over his country's limp response to the kidnapping, torture, gang-rape and murder of one its citizens, Zahra Kazemi. We all are.

Friday, April 1, 2005

The Saudis Meet VDH

This interview of Victor Davis Hanson by the editor of a Saudi paper is simultaneously a hoot and disturbing. The resulting stark contrast in world-views is mind-bending. I am certain the interviewer did not understand the answers, although both men spoke English. (via Friends of Micronesia)

An Audience With Saudi Arabia

"Skin Cells, Pollen Contribute to Air Pollution"

Scientific American: Skin Cells, Pollen Contribute to Air Pollution

When modeling climate, scientists must account for a large number of variables. One of the most challenging is the effect of small particulates suspended in the atmosphere, which can either reflect or absorb incoming radiation from the sun and thus alter its influence. The most common types of aerosols are soot, ash and other man-made particles as well as naturally derived dust and salt. Until now, plants and animals have been considered a small source of particulate pollution. But a new study suggests that up to 25 percent of aerosols worldwide could be coming from biological sources, including fur, skin, pollen and bacteria...

Yeesh. Anyone ever think that rather than contributing to air pollution, they just contribute to...air? Breath deep my friends, breath deep.

Michael Doran on Al Qaeda's Grand Strategy

Yes, He Really Did Take the Stuff

But he didn't put it down his pants, apparently. Imagine if Sandy Berger were a member of the Kerry Administration right now? Ho boy. Sounds to me like he's getting off lucky.

Berger Will Plead Guilty To Taking Classified Paper

Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, a former White House national security adviser, plans to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, and will acknowledge intentionally removing and destroying copies of a classified document about the Clinton administration's record on terrorism.

Berger's plea agreement, which was described yesterday by his advisers and was confirmed by Justice Department officials, will have one of former president Bill Clinton's most influential advisers and one of the Democratic Party's leading foreign policy advisers in a federal court this afternoon.

The deal's terms make clear that Berger spoke falsely last summer in public claims that in 2003 he twice inadvertently walked off with copies of a classified document during visits to the National Archives, then later lost them...

...Under terms negotiated by Berger's attorneys and the Justice Department, he has agreed to pay a $10,000 fine and accept a three-year suspension of his national security clearance...


PA Prepares Population for Peaceful Coexistence

Not. At least not according to this latest report from Palestinian Media Watch. Y'know, one could easily get the idea that without hatred for Jews coupled with their cult of victimhood, the Palestinian Arabs would be left with no identity whatsoever. No wonder it's so hard to give it up.

New Hate Song on PA TV:
Israelis kill Palestinians in God's name
by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook, April 1, 2005

Despite vows by Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas to remove incitement to hatred and violence against Israel from official Palestinian television, the incitement to hatred continues with new programming on PA TV. A cultural program broadcast this week features a song laced with hatred of Israel, accusing Israel of torturing, mutilating and killing Palestinians in the name of God.

As PMW has reported in the past, PA TV has for years used songs and music videos as a vehicle to impart educational messages, and has even mandated the killing of Jews as a religious necessity for Muslims.

To view the report, Kill a Jew - Go To Heaven, click here

Continued...

Continue reading "PA Prepares Population for Peaceful Coexistence"

Thomas Klocek - DePaul's President Speaks

Regarding the ongoing saga of DePaul University professor Thomas Klocek (see previous posts here, here and here) - I have received a copy of the email response DePaul's President has sent out to someone who contacted him about the issue. He has agreed to have his email shared publicly. Rev. Holtschneider responds to the notice many have taken (I mentioned it in my first post on the issue, and it has been brought out in many other places, as well - see here for instance) that DePaul employs noted Holocaust minimizer and "anti-Zionist", Norman Finkelstein. Some have noted that Finkelstein's presence on campus belies the idea that the University is a place where all student's and their "narratives" and backgrounds are equally protected - that some may be more protected than others. (See that first entry for links to the DePaul student paper to see what I'm getting at.)

Here is the President's letter:

Continue reading "Thomas Klocek - DePaul's President Speaks"

It's actually anti-Zionism don't you see...



Akhabar al-khalij, January 28, 2005
The cartoon's heading: "The sixtieth anniversary of the Holocaust."

...not an anti-Semitic bone in their bodies.

From the ADL's Arab Media Review: Anti-Semitism and Other Trends January - February 2005

If the Chinese converted to Judaism...

...more people would care, believe me.

Richard Gere advocated keeping the China arms-embargo active.

OpinionJournal: Don't Abandon Tibet - Why Europe must not lift the arms embargo on China.

...The cause of Tibet is now at a critical juncture. After decades of diplomatic stalemate, talks began again in 2002 between Beijing and the Dalai Lama's envoy, Lodi Gyari. Mr. Gyari described the latest round of talks last year as the most serious exchange of views so far. As the Dalai Lama has repeatedly stated for decades now, the issue is not Tibetan independence from China but rather genuine Tibetan autonomy within the overall structure of a sovereign but benevolent China. This is not unreasonable or unobtainable. The model of Hong Kong certainly comes to mind.[A shockingly modest goal. -Sol]

So now, more than ever, Beijing needs to feel outside pressure if we are to ensure that talks continue. Europe and Washington's most substantial means for pressure is certainly the weapons embargo, which they imposed on China after the Tiananmen Square demonstrations in 1989. Yet the EU is now seriously considering lifting the embargo--it should not. Sixteen years later, China still has not substantively addressed the human rights abuses that led to the embargo, and, in fact, many of those involved in the 1989 demonstrations continue to linger in prison. In Tibet itself, severe restrictions on freedom of expression, association and religion remain in place. This record should not be rewarded with weapons exports...


Free Muslims Against Terror

This is from the Free Muslims Against Terrorism, who, as far as I understand the group, are sincere, and not just temporizing like so many other groups when they say they're "against terror."

Muslims and Middle Easterners March Against Terror and For Freedom and Democracy

The Free Muslims Against Terrorism are proud to announce that on May 14th 2005, Muslims and Middle Easterners of all backgrounds will converge on our nations Capital for a rally against terrorism and to support freedom and democracy in the Middle East and the Muslim world. This will be the first rally of its kind in Washington DC that is lead by Muslims and Middle Easterners.

Join us in sending a message to the extremists and supporters of terrorism that we reject them and that we will do all we can to defeat them.

We also want to send a message of hope to the people of the Muslim world and the Middle East who seek freedom, democracy and who reject authoritarianism and the use of violence that we are with them and that we will do all we can to support them.

This rally is NOT limited to Muslims and Middle Easterners. All people are welcome to join us. We request anyone and everyone who supports our message to join us at the rally. We want to send a message to the extremists and terrorists that American Muslims, Christians, Jews and people of all faiths are united against terrorism and extremism.

We welcome all endorsers and we ask that you circulate and publish this message to as many groups and people as possible. Help us make history.

To sponsor this rally, please send the name of your group to the Free Muslims Against Terrorism.


Quote of the Day

From the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies:

Every time the United States the last quarter century had acted boldly -- its removal of Noriega and aid for the Contras, instantaneous support for a reunified Germany, extension of NATO, preference for Yeltsin instead of Gorbachev, Gulf War I, bombing of Milosevic, support for Sharon's fence, withdrawal from Gaza and decapitation of the Hamas killer elite, taking out the Taliban and Saddam-good things have ensued.

In contrast, on every occasion that we have temporized -- abject withdrawal from Lebanon, appeasement of Arafat at Oslo, a decade of inaction in the Balkans, paralysis in Rwanda, sloth in the face of terrorist attacks, not going to Baghdad in 1991 -- corpses pile up and the United States became either less secure or less respected or both.

(03/18/2005) Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist

Columbia Roundup

Judith has an extensive link-roundup following the release of Columbia University's report on the issues brought out into the light in the film Columbia Unbecoming. She points out, BTW, that all the speeches given at the recent meeting there have now been put online here. Like I mentioned before, there are some real good ones in there you shouldn't miss.

Update: The ADL calls the report "inadequate":

...It's a sad day at Columbia University. The report by the Ad Hoc Grievance Committee protects the faculty, gives little credibility to the students, and comes up with no solutions at all to deal with the concerns about intimidation. The report's finding that there was no anti-Semitism is a red herring, since no one in responsibility has ever charged the university with engaging in anti-Semitism. The issue is, and has always been the alleged intimidation of pro-Israel students by faculty members. That issue is inadequately addressed by the report.

While the report in its language tries to present itself as balanced, the bottom line is that the students who felt intimidated before this inquiry are not better off now than they were before. Rather than focusing on the concerns of students, the report tries to balance the blame and create an equivalency between the professors and the students. The report concludes that some professors in the Middle Eastern and Asian Language and Cultures Department crossed the line, but there are no recommendations for how the university should deal with that conduct, now or in the future...


[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]