Friday, February 9, 2007
James M. Wall of The Christian Century is in hog heaven over Jimmy Carter's book. Wall is the senior contributing editor who called Hamas and Hizballah "Nongovernmental Groups," and is a divestment supporter. His latest, Apartheid Denial, is predictable stuff, defending Carter and using quotations from Jewish voices to do so. You can read it yourself if you choose, but I did want to make a brief comment on one section, where Wall takes a shot at Holocaust scholar Deporah Lipstadt:
Stop right there. This is an inversion of fact. In fact, it is Irving who sued Lipstadt. Lipstadt conducted a successful defense. She certainly did not sue David Irving for being a "Holocaust denier" (in (scare?) quotes). What is going through Wall's head here?
What Lipstadt does not say is that Israel's manner of pursuing its "ideal of Jewish refuge" has brought enormous suffering to the Palestinian people...
On the contrary, over 60 years of Arab war against the region's Jews and each other has brought enormous suffering to the Palestinian Arabs, nothing else. A two-state solution was in the offing in 1947. They rejected it and launched a war. They lost, and have been losing ever since, thanks in large measure to their enablers in the West.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Christian Century's James Wall Loves Jimmy.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/7234
4 Comments
Leave a comment to: The Christian Century's James Wall Loves Jimmy
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
.
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_print=1&x_context=2&x_outlet=163&x_article=1196
http://camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=163&x_article=1270
http://blog.camera.org/archives/2007/02/james_m_wall_makes_yet_another.html#more
What is going through Wall's head here?.
The same that is going through Dhimmi's head?
Wall is a majority-population American, not a Middle Eastern Christian, and I'd be willing to bet he is quite secure, even on a subconscious level, so I think what he's about is even worse than Dhimmi behavior, which at least has some mitigating implications attached to it. What Wall does is far more in the nature of an outright attack. This is how modern Christian anti-Semitism manifests itself.
James Wall is ensconced in his position, naive and secure; intellectually and morally a repulsive presence, a superfluity of superficial and ultimately injurious qualities. He invokes a sadness, a weariness and a revulsion in roughly equal quantities and he does so while being formidably unaware.
And no, it's not unkind to acknowledge his sundry deficits, he's not a mere couch-potato, he's positioned to influence others and he actively works to do so; he's a maladroit and is ultimately mendacious and malignant.