I still don't understand why these European governments held onto these files for so long. This was the burning question, yet the broadcast didn't even broach the question until halfway through, and even then gave the skimpiest of answers. The reporter didn't even name the governments involved. Sure, they said that the governments holding onto the files claimed the families' need for secrecey, but why were there no follow-up questions asked of these governments? Why weren't academic or diplomatic experts not included and interviewed as to what they thought were the reasons?
This was one aspect of the news segment that was very frustrating. Quite frankly, the behavior of the governments was the real news, and this news segment skimmed right over it. Seeing survivors talk about their experience was moving, but it wasn't news. It didn't tell us what we haven't already heard many times. Yet that's what they filled the time with.
A little more aggressive reporting was called for here, not a resort to a predictable story line.
It would be right around the date of this post, but the link above no longer works anyway.
"Syme: It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. You wouldn't have seen the [Newspeak] Dictionary 10th edition, would you Smith? It's that thick. [illustrates thickness with fingers] The 11th Edition will be that [narrows fingers] thick. Winston Smith: So, The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect? Syme: The secret is to move from translation, to direct thought, to automatic response. No need for self-discipline. Language coming from here [the larynx], not from here
[the brain]" -1984 (film)
Note on Permissions:
You may feel free to use anything you find on this site as long as you're not selling it. Just give credit where credit is due is all. Thanks for stopping by!
Site (C)2003-2009 Solomonia.com
This site will not display properly at screen resolutions of less than 1024px wide.
I still don't understand why these European governments held onto these files for so long. This was the burning question, yet the broadcast didn't even broach the question until halfway through, and even then gave the skimpiest of answers. The reporter didn't even name the governments involved. Sure, they said that the governments holding onto the files claimed the families' need for secrecey, but why were there no follow-up questions asked of these governments? Why weren't academic or diplomatic experts not included and interviewed as to what they thought were the reasons?
This was one aspect of the news segment that was very frustrating. Quite frankly, the behavior of the governments was the real news, and this news segment skimmed right over it. Seeing survivors talk about their experience was moving, but it wasn't news. It didn't tell us what we haven't already heard many times. Yet that's what they filled the time with.
A little more aggressive reporting was called for here, not a resort to a predictable story line.
Puts a knot in the pit of my stomach to think that in many ways so many people have forgotten or refuse to see the truth of this..
Please indicate air date for this and other] video clip. I'm forwarding it, but would like to indicate when it was aired as well.
It would be right around the date of this post, but the link above no longer works anyway.