Friday, June 2, 2006
Larry Summers, who's previous statements against an anti-Israel academic boycott some credit with being a factor in his ouster from Harvard, is apparently bowed but not broken:
FT: Israeli academic boycott 'anti-Semitic', says Harvard president
Larry Summers attacked the decision by members of Natfhe on Monday to support a boycott of Israeli academics who fail to dissociate themselves publicly from Israel's "apartheid policies".
He said: "There is much that should be - indeed that must be - debated regarding Israeli policy. And all views can be, should be and will be expressed by those in academic life.
"However, the academic boycott resolution passed by the British professors union in the way that it singles out Israel is in my judgment anti-Semitic in both effect and in intent [emphasis mine]."
He added that he hoped the decision would be repudiated "in the strongest possible terms" by scholars around the world...
Interestingly, Stephen Rose gets the last word in both this and the Haaretz article I read on the boycott. In both cases he is lauded for his academic credentials, not for his anti-Israel activities which are his real claim to fame. Intentional bias in framing the story? You be the judge.
"There is nothing anti-Semitic about putting pressure on Israeli institutors and their academic staff to fight against the illegal and anti-human-rights policies of the Israeli state.
"When Israeli academic institutions and staff protest for the academic freedom of their academic colleagues in Palestine then I will feel more sympathetic to them."
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Israeli academic boycott 'anti-Semitic', says Harvard president.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/6301
2 Comments
Leave a comment to: Israeli academic boycott 'anti-Semitic', says Harvard president
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
"When Israeli academic institutions and staff protest for the academic freedom of their academic colleagues in Palestine then I will feel more sympathetic to them."
Shouldn't the honorable Neurobiologist take it up with the Palestinian Authority, because in Israel the Arabs have complete academic freedom where for example the Dean of Haifa University is an Arab; but then I suppose this is the Freudian slip that exposes his opposition to the Jewish state.
As for the
"... to fight against the illegal and anti-human-rights policies of the Israeli state. "
One needs to ask if this following post from Treppenwitz is an example of anti-human-rights policies practiced in the hated zionist state?
http://bogieworks.blogs.com/treppenwitz/2006/05/not_with_a_whim.html
"However as this little Palestinian girl was already in an Israeli hospital and suffering from a condition that the Palestinian medical community was not able to adequately treat, a creative solution was sought.
The Schneider Medical Center agreed to absorb a large chunk of operation's cost, as did the Peres Center for Peace. Of the $58,000 price tag, Schneider Hospital and the Peres Center each agreed to pay $24,000, while the PA was asked to kick in only $10,000. Not a bad deal considering how the rising cost of rocket components and guns has the Palestinian Authority in a bit of a financial crunch just lately.
So what happened? "
Were it the case of AHR then I'm sure that they would not have permitted the situation to have occurred in the first place.
" Anyway, knock me over with a feather... Abu Mazen (Dr. Abbas' nom de guerre) agreed that the PA would pay its share for the operation and forwarded the bill to his Minister of Health, Dr. Bassim Na'im (who actually is an MD).
Well, it seems Dr. Na'im had a bit of a conflict when presented with the bill. You see, in addition to being a physician ('First do no harm'), he's also a member of Hamas ('First, do no good').
Guess which side won this Faustian tug-o-war? You got it... Dr. Na'im refused to write the check for the PA's share of the bone marrow procedure because, "...it would be seen as cooperating with the Zionist enemy."
Strange that Hamas did not go running to its European supporters for help in this humanitarian crisis.
By the way whenever one comes across the bad state of Arab towns and villages bear in mind that most of the inhabitants object to paying rates and taxes because " the money will go to the Jews".
Small wonder they appear as they do because they negate their responsibility in society.
Good for Summers, but he's truly a voice in the wilderness on this one.