Amazon.com Widgets

Monday, April 24, 2006

Martin Kramer was at an off-the-record at Princeton opposite John Mearsheimer this past weekend. He can't talk about what others said, but he's doing the full dish on his own remarks, and they are a must-read. I can't resist a significant pull-quote for the click-phobic:

...Until 1973, such wars did not threaten the oil flow; but that one did. That meant that yet another Arab-Israeli war might have the same impact or worse. The United States therefore resolved to prevent such wars, by creating a security architecture--the pax Americana.

How did it do that? One way would have been to squeeze Israel relentlessly. But the United States understood that making Israel feel less secure would only enhance the likelihood of another war. It would also encourage the Arab states to prepare for yet another round. Instead, the U.S. solution was to show such strong support for Israel, as to make Arab states despair of defeating it, and fearful of the cost of trying; and to bring Israel entirely into the U.S. orbit, to make of it a dependent client through arms and aid. The mechanism for tying it all together was and still is the "peace process," a series of U.S.-mediated Israeli concessions of territory Israel occupied in 1967.

The results of this strategy have been stupendously successful. There has not been a general Arab-Israeli war since 1973. The Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty changed the dynamic. Jordan came in later, and Syria has kept its direct front with Israel quiet for just as long. Thanks to this stability, and the absence of destructive wars between Israel and Arab states, 1973 has not been repeated.

Now, Israel continues to confront some Palestinians. But we have learned that even the worst of these contests does not have the same impact as a full-blown war between Israel and Arab states. When these conflicts erupt, Arab oil states send aid to the Palestinians, and they even come up with their own peace initiatives. But they do not threaten an oil embargo against the West or the United States. (There are not even boycotts of U.S. goods. Arab consumers have not punished the United States for its support of Israel the way they have punished Denmark for a few cartoons in its press.)

So I return to my earlier point. A superpower can not only sustain seeming contradictions in its policy, it can turn contradictions into compatibilities. U.S. support for Israel--indeed, the illusion of its unconditionality-- has compelled Israel's Arab neighbors to join the pax Americana or at least acquiesce in it. And the United States, by enhancing and sustaining support for Israel these past thirty years, has prevented the one kind of Arab-Israeli war that might impede the flow of oil. All this has been done with a comparatively modest investment of treasure, and only symbolic deployments of U.S. forces, well out of harm's way. (Sinai observers and a few Patriot missile batteries are the sum of it.)...

The rest is here.

4 Comments

Brilliant stuff by him but giving that hack even the dignification (word?) of addressing his hack paper bathers me.

It's like futher opening the can of worms and making it almost respectable for the conspiratorial to become fodder for mainstream discussion.

Nonetheless, Kramer's points are excellent.

Wouldn't you love to have been a fly on the wall at a meeting that included like Arabist Oil Execs and Mearsheimer.

What was the organization that organized this and I wonder how did Kramer get invited?

Mike

PS Malkin and Volkh's rap up on the Penn State situation were excellent.

I didn't see those. I'll look for them.

Found the Volkh posts, I'll link those later. Malkin is down atm.

They're all in my post on the Penn State situation.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]