Saturday, March 18, 2006
Roger Simon has a very good short post in reaction to that essay published by the Kennedy School (see: Kennedy School: It's All AIPAC's Fault). His point, that secular-oriented people tend to forget that the religious often have motivations that go beyond physical comforts, is one that can be widely applied, especially in the Middle East: The Protocols of the Elders of Harvard:
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Explaining the religious mind-set.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/5899
2 Comments
Leave a comment to: Explaining the religious mind-set
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
, p.39
"...it's very hard for the secular mind - I know this well from my own experience - to identify with and understand societies deeply bound in faith and tradition. "
For what it's worth, some time last year Israel's channel 10 interviewed an Israeli who had been employed in the States in a very well paid hi-tec job.
Asked why he came back to start up anew here he said that in Israel, he can think and has the peace of mind to imagine and create.
Mearsheimer's and Walt's original sendup is a piece of presumptuous petulance which wouldn't be given a second thought (in terms of what it purports to analyze) if it weren't for the combination of their ivy strewn bona fides (which allows them to speak as authorities rather than in more substantially explicated terms) and aspects of the general zeitgeist which presumes a great deal and treats received opinion as Holy Writ. I.e., a boorishly superficial and soporific sendup passing as serious analysis.
Similarly - and in large part because they are presuming to speak as authorities rather than in more substantial and thoughtfully paced terms - there is something of an analog with Mark Twain's observation that "a lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." To fully respond to Mearsheimer and Walt one might need to write volume or two on subjects ranging from the philosophical (e.g., epistemology, onto-theology) to the social/political, historical, etc. That is the advantage someone like a Mearsheimer has when intoning as presumptive authority rather than in more transparent and better informed terms.
What Mearsheimer and Walt invoke is a rhetoric which attempts to ply force and power, not historical elucidation and transparent critique. Not uncommon.