Amazon.com Widgets

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

The Star Tribune's reader rep is to be applauded for getting it mostly right on the use of the term "terrorist":

...Style and policy at newspapers is not carved in stone for very good reasons. It evolves with our understanding of the world. Star Tribune editors would serve readers well by stepping back from the rush of trying to capture the worldwide story of terrorism to make sure style, policy and language are fair, equitable and accurate.

Whether suicide bombers and others deliberately blow up children and their parents in Oklahoma City, New York, Baghdad, London, Netanya in Israel or Sharm el-Sheik in Egypt, at that horrific moment the perpetrators become terrorists, wiping away all complexity and nuance regarding their cause.

In situations that unambiguous, the newspaper shouldn't shy away from the truth of plain language or hide behind the policies of the wire services.

On the other hand, an emailer informs me that the response from the editors of the paper to their request that the use of the term "terrorist" be more consistent resulted in a reply indicating that they have no intention of changing their current uneven standards, for which they should be condemned.

Previous related posts: What Kind of People Edit the Boston Globe? and Washington Post takes on the T word.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]