Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Well, not quite. There's no staged video on this one.

The Jerusalem Post reports:

Suspect held in Palestinian clan feud

Palestinian sources said they had arrested a suspect on Thursday in the stabbing of a 12-year-old Palestinian boy Wednesday night in the West Bank village of Karyut. The sources confirmed that the suspect was a member of a rival clan, Israel Radio reported.

Earlier, Palestinian sources had reported that the boy was killed in a brawl that erupted between Palestinian youths and Israeli settlers who had entered the village from the nearby settlement of Shiloh.

However, Palestinian officials soon admitted to IDF officers that the incident was related to an inter-clan dispute.

Palestinian hospital workers identified the dead boy as Yazan Mohammed Mussa, 12, and said he died while being treated for 11 stab wounds.

The incident occurred at around six in the evening, but it took more then three hours before the Palestinians notified Israeli security officials.

Israeli police immediately opened an investigation, and said that the possibility of an inter-Palestinian feud was one of the options being investigated.

A youth who was with Mussa at the time of the incident said the victim was attacked by two strangers.

Although he was sure they were not from their home village of Karir, adjacent to Shiloh, he fled before hearing what language they spoke and therefore could not positively identify them as Israelis.

Here's how the New York Times' Greg Myre reported it:

...Late on Wednesday, Reuters reported that a Palestinian boy had been stabbed to death by Israelis in the West Bank, citing reports from unidentified Palestinians.

The boy was taken to Rafidiah Hospital in Nablus, and Dr. Musa Alayan, who examined the body, said he had found 14 stab wounds to the head, chest and abdomen, but initial reports were sketchy.

The boy, identified as Yazan Musa, 12 or 13, was playing with a friend near Qaryout on Wednesday when he was stabbed by Jewish settlers who had marched in the area, Reuters and Israeli radio reported.

The Israeli police had received a report from the Palestinian authorities that the boy had been killed and had begun an investigation, said a spokesman, Shlomi Sagi. He said he could not immediately confirm any circumstances of the killing...

With a little bit of experience with the people involved -- given the Palestinians' penchant for saying anything to blame the Israelis and Reuters' penchant for reporting anything that makes the Israelis look bad, wouldn't it have been more responsible just to state the circumstances were unclear before you could do a little digging on your own?

Update: A reader emails that they contacted the reporter on the story, Mr. Myre, and he has been sending a standard response to inquiries (I say that not as a criticism of the response, but as explanation as to why I feel it's OK to post an excerpt). Here's a snip:

...Before I wrote a word, the boy's death was being reported by Israel's two leading television networks and the two main radio stations, and three leading Israeli newspapers already had stories on their web sites. All three wire services - AP, Reuters, and AFP - also had stories on the wire. Every one of these reports emphasized the Palestinian claim that Israelis were responsible.

I cite this not to absolve myself of responsibility for my reporting, but to note that this was the only information that was available Wednesday night, and it proved not to be accurate as additional information became available Thursday morning...

...We noted this in the story and stressed that the initial reports were sketchy. I wish we had cast even more skepticism on the Palestinian claim.

As soon as we had additional information on Thursday morning, we updated the story on the Times' web site to note that a Palestinian had been arrested in the case and that the Israeli police had found no evidence to support the Palestinian claim. This is also set to appear in the print edition on Friday...

I think this response reflects well upon the reporter, although not upon the craft of conveying information through the news. The reason for the screw-up is about what I'd expect -- other outlets were going to report what they had and The Times didn't want to be slow to the punch. So instead of waiting a little and checking the facts, they went with what they had, giving a victory to those who lie the most brazenly, and putting responsible parties (in this case, the Israeli authorities who didn't want to say anything before they'd had a chance to investigate) on the short end of the stick. We all lose from that, and as I mentioned above, experienced observers should know better.

Will they never learn?

(Aside: I don't notice any change in the Times report I linked above.)

1 Comment

i belive ,the fast jugment inthis case was wrong
the settlers of shilow were not to be blamed
this boy was killed by his freind who try to manover the story on the settlers near by.
the incedent did happen on the rode leads to a water spring .this rode is close by the settlers of shillow.this the main rode leads to the vellige the people in qaryout suffer in their transportation thru this rode jus becuse the people in shilow dont like the the rodes to run close by them.and this the price to pay a boy was killed

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]