Amazon.com Widgets

Saturday, April 3, 2010

[The following, by Barry Rubin, is crossposted from The Rubin Report.]

Charles Freeman has just taken another step in revealing his out-of-control loathing of Israel, accusing it of being worse than South Africa. Who is he and why is this significant?

It matters because Freeman, with nothing more to lose from making public his true feelings, had been the Obama Administration nominee to be coordinator of Middle East intelligence. Freeman had to withdraw and though the real reason has never before been made public, it is this: he was involved in business with Saudi Arabia which came dangerously close to the borders of legality.

Freeman's connections with China also raised questions.

By the way, note that this gentleman who finds Israel so offensive has never had anything but praise for the Saudi political system and society. Obviously, a country is not like South Africa if it pays you a lot of money but it is like South Africa if a country that hates it is generously rewarding you. For more on this connection, go here

Freeman was also a client of the Saudis to such an extent that then Secretary of State James Baker apparently decided to get rid of him. Baker, who certainly couldn't be accused of being pro-Israel, described Freeman in scathing terms in his own autobiography for always taking the Saudi line in a way that interfered in the effort to force Iraq out of Kuwait in 1990-1991.

Since losing the nomination, Freeman has been more and more hysterical in expressing his hatred of Israel, with strong hints that his attitude extended to Jews generally. The story of how Freeman was kept out of office is an amazing tale of how a handful of bloggers--without support from any group or institution--forced the story into public attention. One day I might tell it to you.

Meanwhile, though, reflect on how things would be if Freeman was in a high administration position and ask yourself what kind of administration would have appointed such a man to a highly influential post. The issue here is not just attitude toward Israel but picking someone who had some questionable associations, a bad record as ambassador, and seems emotionally somewhat unstable as well.

1 Comment

BTW, the last time Chas Freeman was heard of, he appeared on Press TV, saying to the Iranian audience:

"The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth,"

www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx

Press TV offers regular spots to such luminaries as George Galloway, Yvonne Ridley, Tariq Ramadan, Lauren Booth. It also published an article by the British science historian Nicholas Kollerstrom, a Holocaust denier.

Such is the company of Freeman these days.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]