Thursday, January 22, 2009

Billed as simply, "Gaza In Context: Background and Prospects From the Current Crisis", Harvard's Center for Middle Eastern Studies recently presented its spin on the recent Gaza war. By the lecture's title, a casual observer might be led to think that an objective, dispassionate analysis of the conflict was in the offing. Think again. At the end of the two hour session, Harvard had registered its candidacy for MIHU (Most Israel Hating University) to compete with Columbia, UC Irvine and Florida Atlantic University. Keep in mind that Harvard is home to one of the world's most vicious Israel-critics, one Sara Roy, whose vitriol is made all the more effective by her claim to be a daughter of Holocaust survivors.

Ostensibly speaking on the human rights legal aspects of the Gaza war were Professor Duncan Kennedy and Naz K. Modirzadeh. Professor Kennedy is not primarily an expert in international law, his area of expertise being contract law, housing law, torts and (why are we not surprised?) "Left Wing Law and Economics."

Ms. Modirzadeh is a Senior Associate in Harvard's International Humanitarian Law Research Initative, one of the ever- growing apologists for Islamic Shari'ah Law at Harvard. Ms. Modirzadeh has written:

"Much of substantive Islamic law is either consonant with human rights (rules relating to economic, social, and cultural rights, for example), or have no obvious bearing on human rights."

Such scrub-a-dub excusers of Islam's harsh, medieval legal code are legion at Harvard, at the top of which sits Sheikh Noah Feldman who apparently sees the application of Shari'ah Law and its concomitant oppression of Muslims and non-Muslims as a bright, shining beacon for the world.

The title of the lecture was the bait. And the switch was fast in coming. No sooner was the lecture under way than Ms. Modirzadeh set the tone for the talk:

"(the conflict) takes place against the backdrop of occupation"

followed by

"Civilians (Palestinians) seemingly being directly attacked"

And guess who is the "occupier" (read "oppressor") is and who the "occupied" ("victim")? You see, the dominant paradigm in the Israel Arab conflict for virtually every institution of higher learning around the world is that of Israel's "effective" occupation even though polemicists like Ms. Modirzadeh are forced to concede Israel's evacuation of the Gaza strip in 2005. Protecting its civilians from deliberate, targeted missile and mortar attacks which have gone on almost daily for over 6 years is simply another manifestation of Israel's "effective occupation." According to this tortured logic, a country which has been attacked must permit the attacks because any military response is legally and morally suspect because such defense is tantamount to "occupation." Not only is Israel prohibited from entering Gaza to silence the rocket attacks, but as the "effective" occupying power, it is legally and morally obligated to protect all the citizens of Gaza.

The switch resplendent.

The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs puts the lie to the argument here. Most jaw-dropping in both speakers' presentations was the cursory, virtually non-existent mention of Hamas or Islamic Jihad and their war against Jewish civilians. While holding Israel to absurd legal and moral standards, Hamastan got a virtual free pass on humanitarian rights violations Out of nearly two hours of indictments against Israel and its supposed deliberate targeting of civilians in Gaza, Hamas' self-admitted and unapologetic war on Jewish civilians amounted to roughly 5% of the presentation.

Human rights law pertaining to the concepts of proportionality (if someone punches you in the nose, you don't burn down his house) and distinction (targeting combatants not civilians) was presented to the audience with relentless examples of supposed Israeli violations.

But what the two presenters omitted -- intentionally, I believe -- was the third principle of human rights law triggered by armed conflict (jus in bellum) -- the principle called Perfidy. This principle has to do with deliberate deception in the conduct of war.

As Article 28 of the Fourth Geneva Convention makes clear, the presence of civilians "may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations." The article also makes clear that Palestinian attempts to use civilian shields are unlawful.

It is obvious why the polemical professor and his associate would not want to inform their audience of this important precept. They might have to acknowledge the incontrovertible perfidy of their clients, the Gazan Palestinians. Such omission is morally reprehensible, academically dishonest and entirely predictable in the current university culture. And yet, considering Harvard's place on top of the heap of prestigious colleges, one would expect a bit more honesty and fairness. No such luck.

Both presenters brought up the alleged use of "white phosphorous" by the IDF in Gaza, a substance that has been banned for use against civilians by the Geneva Convention, but which is permissible to use as an illuminant on the battlefield. Recently, the International Committee of the Red Cross exonerated Israel in such use. When I challenged Kennedy on this point, he refused to comment. And when I brought up the fact that Hamas had deliberately loaded mortar shells with the banned substance and fired them at Jewish civilian population centers, they also declined to comment.

To accompany their tendentious talk, Harvard's Center for Middle Eastern Studies handed out an "information" sheet about Gaza (reproduced below):

Just a few notes on the handout:

  • According to the handout, Egypt "administered" Gaza from 1948-1967, while Israel "militarily occupied " it from "1967 to the present" (Egypt did maintain a military presence in Gaza). Despite the fact that no Israeli soldiers, police, bureaucrats or, for that matter, not a single Jew (with the exception of a brief visit last year by Jeff Halper, the Israel-hating putative Jew) has set foot in Gaza since the pullout in 2005, Harvard considers Gaza "occupied."
  • Among the "Human Rights" organizations cited are B'Tselem (the group that considers the Palestinian homicide bomber prior to his actual detonation a "non-combatant"), Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, organizations that have branded Israel one the greatest human rights violators in the world while only occasionally citing Palestinian terror groups.
  • Note the map caption "Israel's navy stopped an Iranian ship off the coast, carrying aid and food." Considering the amount of advanced missilery and other weapons supplied to Gaza by Iran during the past 7 years including the 50 tons of weapons seized on the Iranian ship, the KarineA in 2002, Israeli action is completely justified.
  • The map contains no markings or reference to of the hundreds of qassam or katyusha missile launching sites, especially in the northern Gaza strip.

harvardhandout.jpg harvardhandout2.jpg
Click to enlarge.

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Bait, Switch and Dish -- Harvard Style.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

» UCLA 2009, or Freiburg University 1933? at the blog Solomonia

The universities were among the first institutions the Nazis took over. This one sounds worse than what went on at Harvard a couple weeks back: Campus Watch: Jew-Hate at UCLA [incl. Gabriel Piterberg, Lisa Hajjar, Richard Falk, Saree Makdisi] Eric... Read More

» It's Bash Israel Week on Campus at the blog Solomonia

Richard Landes has a preliminary report from BU: BU Panel on "Gaza Behind the Headlines" Boring and Predictably Dishonest I just got back from a panel organized and hosted by the Muslim Law Student's Association, a "discussion about huma... Read More


Yet additional confirmation that the Fourth and Fifth Estates have taken on the characteristics of the First and Second Estates. Not a new insight, but worthy of some pointed emphasis nonetheless.

Masters, these fanciful and fashionably knowing types. Masters, of self-regard, of self-aggrandizement and of fundamental deceits.

Kennedy is now pushing divestment in the Harvard Crimson. Read this.

"Syme: It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. You wouldn't have seen the [Newspeak] Dictionary 10th edition, would you Smith? It's that thick. [illustrates thickness with fingers] The 11th Edition will be that [narrows fingers] thick. Winston Smith: So, The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect? Syme: The secret is to move from translation, to direct thought, to automatic response. No need for self-discipline. Language coming from here [the larynx], not from here [the brain]" -1984 (film)


Blogroll Me!

Adam Holland
Agam's Gecko
Amy Ridenour
Armies of Liberation
Astute Blogger
Backseat Blogger
Barry Rubin
Blazing Cat Fur
Boker tov, Boulder
Bosch Fawstin
Breath of the Beast
Challah Hu Akbar
CiF Watch
Cinnamon Stillwell
Classical Values
Combs Spouts Off
Conservative Grapevine
Conservative Oasis Contentions
Contentious Centrist
Cox & Forkum
Creeping Sharia
Dancing with Dogs
Dave Bender
Davids Medienkritik
Dean Esmay
Defending Crusader
Democracy Project
Dreams Into Lightning
Dutchblog Israel
Exit Zero
Ghost of a Flea
GM's Place
The God Blog
Huff-Po Monitor
In Context
Insignificant Thoughts
Iraq the Model
Israel Matzav
Israel Seen
J Street Jive
Jerusalem Diaries
Jerusalem Posts
Jewish State
Kesher Talk
Legal Insurrection
Liberty's Spirit
Marathon Pundit
The Marmot's Hole
Martin Kramer
Matthew K. Tabor
Mere Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin
Mick Hartley
Mind of Mog
My Machberet
My Wide Blue Seas
Never Yet Melted
One Jerusalem
Paula Says
Point of no Return
Political inSecurity
Random Thoughts
Ranting Sandmonkey
Red Planet Cartoons
Right Wing News
Roger L. Simon
Seraphic Secret
Shawarma Mayor
Shining City
Simply Jews
Soccer Dad
A Soldier's Mother
Solomon's House
Something Something
Somewhere on A1A
Stand for Israel
Survival Tips: The Survivalist Blog
Tasty Infidelicacies
Tel Chai Nation
Texican Tattler
Themistocles' Shade
This Ain't Hell
Tikkun Olam
Tom Glennon
Tools of Renewal
Tundra Tabloids
UCC Truths
Vicious Babushka
The View From Here
View From Iran
The World
Yaacov Lozowick
Yid With Lid

:New England Blogs:
Augean Stables
Bloodthirsty Liberal
Boston Maggie
Boston's Patriots
Boulevard Girl
Business of Life
Daniel in Brookline
Hub Blog
Hub Politics
Jules Crittenden
Libertarian Leanings
Maggie's Farm
Miss Kelly
N.E. Republican
People's Republicans
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Sippican Cottage
Squaring the Globe
Universal Hub
Weekend Pundit
Who Knew?

Blogroll Policy

If You Enjoy This Site
Paypal Donate

Amazon Purchase
(Buy yourself something with this link and I will get a percentage.)

My Amazon Wish List

Worth a Click





Solomonia Button

Smaller Button

Smallest Button

Note on Permissions:
You may feel free to use anything you find on this site as long as you're not selling it. Just give credit where credit is due is all. Thanks for stopping by!

Site (C)2003-2009

This site will not display properly at screen resolutions of less than 1024px wide.

Solomonia Store




Martin Solomon

Mary Madigan

Hillel Stavis


Jon Haber
Jon Haber


Opinions expressed are those of the individual. No one speaks for any organization unless expressly stated.

Enter your Email for a Daily Digest of New Posts

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
(Be sure to whitelist if you aren't receiving updates.)

Click here for other subscription options, including Twitter, AIM, MSM and others.

Follow me on Twitter



 Subscribe in a reader


EN 160x600 B

Quality Diamond Crosses