Amazon.com Widgets

Thursday, May 8, 2008

I attended this conference featuring lectures by Joseph Massad, Gil Anidjar, Noha Radwan and Lila Abu-Lughod on a dark and stormy evening last week. Columbia's non-tenured Joseph Massad, whose manner and delivery reminded me of Vincent Price in his later films, stole the show, but many students in the audience were quietly unimpressed.

As Israelis look towards the future in their celebration of the nation’s 60th birthday, some Palestinians cling to the past by commemorating what they call the "Nakba" or "the catastrophe." A faculty panel discussion held at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) last month and titled, "60 Years of Nakba—The Catastrophe of Palestine 1948-2008," was one of many similar lamentations held worldwide.

The tone from the outset was grim. Speakers acknowledged that another "Nakba" anniversary was confirmation that combined Palestinian and Arab attempts to eliminate the Jewish state have not succeeded.

Despite this, Columbia's controversial associate professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history, Joseph Massad, was upbeat. According to Massad, the Israelis have won military victories, but the "Palestinian resistance" has successfully rebranded them. Through 60 years of tireless propaganda efforts, the Palestinian term, "Nakba," has replaced "Israel’s war of independence"; "apartheid" has replaced "Jewish sovereignty"; the "plight of the Palestinians" has replaced “the return of the Jews to their ancestral homeland"; the "Palestinians" has replaced "the non-Jewish community of Palestine." And even in the culinary world, Massad claimed, "Palestinian Maftool" has replaced "Israeli couscous." (Like many of Massad’s claims, the couscous issue is debatable. A recent visit to Whole Foods Market proved that Israeli couscous is still the preferred nomenclature.)

Massad’s concept of victory reframed the event. It was no longer a dirge-like recitation of perpetual victimization, but rather a showcase—a preview of new trends in “resistance” propagandizing.

So what’s "in" this season? Using the "renaming" strategy to make the destruction of Israel more palatable to the West was the faculty panel’s primary theme. Portraying the only democratic state in the Middle East as a brutal, non-democratic "Jewish supremacist and racist state," as Massad once put it, was the secondary theme.

Read the rest at FrontPage

4 Comments

Once again Mary Madigan ventures into the belly of the beast. Nicely done.

Thanks!

(and yes, it's a belly filled with baleful, rancid gasses)

She told the audience about her father’s return to Israel and how he kept “getting lost because he couldn't read Hebrew, and was afraid to ask.”

Taquiya; pure lies for the suckers who make up their audiences.
Not only are street signs in Arabic but all official documents of the State are in Hebrew and Arabic, and all food packaging describing the contents, and all pharmaceutical products, and ......

And all the Arabs who are attended in Arabic in public.

HAPPY NAKBA PaleSWINE!

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]