Saturday, March 1, 2008
Arnold Roth, whose daughter Malki was killed in the Sbarro Restaurant bombing, writes about John Dugard, UN "Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967":
...He's erudite and talks well and smoothly, no doubt about it. In the course of about an hour of conversation, I learned some interesting things about how he does his job. Then we came to the end of our meeting, and he thanked me for making the time to meet. He very politely expressed appreciation that I had decided to share some views with him. And then, with no evident sign of realizing the impact on me, he said he had never met an Israeli victim of terror before. And our meeting was over...
Wow.
...Perhaps it follows that when you give a man half a job-title, you end up with a half-baked analysis. As a white South African, Dugard might be excused for framing conflicts in terms of the one of which he was part, the one he knows best. But with his one-eye-open, one-eye-closed view of the war of the Jihadists against the Jews, it's inexcusable that he seems to know nothing (to cite just one instance) about the role of Arafat, Fatah and the so-called fedayeen at a time (1966 for example) when the total size of the territory he calls "Israeli-occupied" was zero.
If we're wrong, and if Dugard really does know about those matters, about the role they played and play today, about the deep roots of hatred and of jihadism and of terrorism by Arabs in this ongoing war against Israelis and Jews, then his fatuous, simplistic wrap-up and resort to a discredited "root cause" is a disgrace to him and to those who gave him the job.
It's surreal, and worth reading in full.
Click to share this post
ma.gnolia | Reddit | Newsvine | Furl | Google
Spurl | Yahoo | Blink List | Connotea | Feed Me
Simpy | Linkroll | Blogmarks | Sphere | Technorati
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: John Dugard, the UN Specialist Who Had Never Met an Israeli Victim of Terror.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/14280
1 Comment
Leave a comment to: John Dugard, the UN Specialist Who Had Never Met an Israeli Victim of Terror
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
Oleaginous is the term that comes to mind to describe a Dugard. Self-promoting, self-regarding and repulsively superficial when it comes to things that matter are other apt terms. He ingratiates himself, via a certain superficial and superficially applied intelligence and erudition, to the tempers of the times, to a certain broad spectrum of the zeitgeist, and for what? Self-promotion and career advancement? To be "relevant" within the moral and political economies of this present era and age? Who can know with any degree of certainty? The only thing that can be known is what the Dugards of the world, deserving of infamy and nothing less than infamy, positively and studiously and resolutely omit from their world view and political praxis.
A Jimmy Carter reflects a different type of oleaginous quality, one whose smiling, superficial and ingratiating appeal finds a more demotic register than does Dugard's and the Dugards of the world. Dugard is more representative of the "international community" and for that reason is a more pernicious factor, imo. They are equally repulsive, though, in notable part due to that oleaginous quality.