Friday, November 13, 2009
So says the JPost: Author of organ theft article has 'change of heart'
Journalist Donald Bostrom, whose August article in the Swedish publication Aftonbladet accused the IDF of harvesting the organs of Palestinians during Operation Cast Lead, has had an apparent change of heart, Army Radio reported on Thursday.
Sources close to Bostrom related that his visit to Israel and the fair dialogues he was involved in caused him to think twice about the whole story, according to the report.
While in Israel for the Dimona media conference, Bostrom was interviewed by multiple Israeli media outlets and heard serious criticism of his article andthe accounts of IDF organ theft. It was quickly revealed that Bostrom's account lacked hard facts and relied on accounts from bereaved Palestinian families.
Upon his return to Sweden, Bostrom decided to cancel his participation in the Beirut conference, the goal of which was to slander Israel, the radio station said...
...Ze'ev Feiner, head of the group that initiated Bostrom's visit, was pleased with the journalist's apparent change of opinion.
"It is no secret that many thought it was not right to invite Bostrom to the Dimona media conference last week. But we now see that the decision to bring him was right and an excellent one from a public relations perspective. It is just a shame that we did not bring him two weeks prior,"the radio station quoted Feiner as saying.
We'll see where it (he) goes from here. Wonder how his editor feels about it.
[h/t: Seva]
Oh, by the way, according the Swedish Justice Minister, there was No legal excuse for Swedish Foreign Minister Bildt to refrain from criticizing blood libel article in Aftonbladet.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Swedish Blood Libel Reporter Has 'Change of Heart'.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/17063
1 Comment
Leave a comment to: Swedish Blood Libel Reporter Has 'Change of Heart'
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
, p.73
What is really weird is how fast he changed his mind once he was faced with Israeli journalists asking hard questions.
Apparently, Bostrom was used to writing for a kind of audience, and the kind of editors, who would eat this stuff up. He apparently is a conformist, believing in all the conventions of the people he lives among and works for, but quickly dispensing of his story when immersed in a different environment.
It makes one wonder at how big a role is played by opportunism, peer pressure, lack of imagination, and a lack of knowledge and courage all play in determining the behavior of reporters.
It makes one also realize how damaging it is to Israel that an anti-Israeli mode of thought has become entrenched in the world, and how things could be very different if that were not so.
By the way, if ever you read of a Frenchman, especially a French diplomat, lacerating Israel for being such a terrible country, just remember what's in this New York Times article from today:
http://tinyurl.com/yj6kbul