Wednesday, September 16, 2009
If you've been following the Boston Mayoral race lately, you'll be aware of the growing scandal involving the deletion of emails by city employees contrary to state law. The Globe notes that the Menino Administration was warned against this practice previously, but ignored the warning: Judge warned city on e-mails in 2008
Mayor Thomas M. Menino's administration was warned by a state judge late last year that city employees were deleting e-mails in apparent violation of state public records law, but city officials failed to halt the practice.
The judge's order, made in a lawsuit against the Boston Redevelopment Authority, shows that the problem of records destruction at City Hall has extended well beyond Menino's closest aide, Michael J. Kineavy, whose e-mails the Globe sought through a public records request this summer.
Superior Court Judge Ralph D. Gants wrote in a November court order that BRA employees had been permitted to delete e-mails without keeping hard copies or electronic backups.
"It is plain that the BRA failed to comply with its obligation to retain e-mails in accordance with [state law],'' Gants wrote. "Prior to 2007, the BRA frequently asked its staff to delete e-mails so that its e-mail storage load would not exceed what was desirable for the efficient use of its e-mail servers.''
State public records law requires municipal employees to save electronic correspondence for at least two years, even if the contents are of "no informational or evidential value.'' Penalties include fines of up to $500 or prison sentences of up to one year...
Adamg notes the case that the Globe is loath to remind us of, that is, The David Project's suit against the Boston Redevelopment Authority to discover records involving their shady land dealings with the Boston Mosque.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Boston Globe Mentions Email Controversy, Avoids Mentioning the Case.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/16826
1 Comment
Leave a comment to: Boston Globe Mentions Email Controversy, Avoids Mentioning the Case
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
, p.30
Anyone who uses an email program must remove emails from his inbox if he doesn't want to have to scan through thousands of messages. And getting rid of the inevitable SPAM is also a great idea. I mean, what Boston City Hall employee wants to accidentally forward a Viagra ad to someone? And why put the responsibility on a user whose workstation could lose ALL of the emails if the machine crashes?
This fake scandal really should be directed at the city IT department, which was negligent in implementing the appropriate backups on the email SERVER. There are plenty of companies out there who can provide this expertise. Sarbanes-Oxley requires it of businesses.
So if heads must roll, start with the person who hired (or failed to hire) a competent IT consultant.