Saturday, March 1, 2008
According to Jerry Muller in Real Clear Politics, they don't 'get' cultural assimilation abroad. Maybe they never will..?
Americans also find ethnonationalism discomfiting both intellectually and morally. Social scientists go to great lengths to demonstrate that it is a product not of nature but of culture, often deliberately constructed. And ethicists scorn value systems based on narrow group identities rather than cosmopolitanism.
But none of this will make ethnonationalism go away. Immigrants to the United States usually arrive with a willingness to fit into their new country and reshape their identities accordingly. But for those who remain behind in lands where their ancestors have lived for generations, if not centuries, political identities often take ethnic form, producing competing communal claims to political power. The creation of a peaceful regional order of nation-states has usually been the product of a violent process of ethnic separation. In areas where that separation has not yet occurred, politics is apt to remain ugly.
[link thanks to Alan Sullivan]
Click to share this post
ma.gnolia | Reddit | Newsvine | Furl | Google
Spurl | Yahoo | Blink List | Connotea | Feed Me
Simpy | Linkroll | Blogmarks | Sphere | Technorati
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The persistence of separatism.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/14277
1 Comment
Leave a comment to: The persistence of separatism
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!




A superb essay that asks most all of the right questions and perhaps answers a few of them as well. But there are some dialectics that go unexplored and some categories that could be better clarified. For example his liberal nationalism (in contrast to an ethnic nationalism) could perhaps be better labeled as a cultural nationalism and identity (e.g., the U.S.) since it reflects something that is fostered and nurtured and does not simply or directly flow from classical liberal ideas, even if those ideas play a prominent role. Ultimately, in socio-political terms, an acceptance of the constituting hallmarks of the social contract need to be felt and accepted deep within the marrow of the citizen if those terms are to be truly accepted, i.e. consciously, intellectually, morally, etc. Hence a socio-political monism - as is conceived for example by salafists and jihadists and other dominant strains of Islam - may simply not permit a deeply felt congruity between personal beliefs vs. socio-cultural and political assimilation.
Iow, ultimately, personal identity in its deepest reaches is the subject matter, the "raw material" that needs to be addressed and personal identity is founded, in substantial and critical part, upon how ultimates are approached and dealt with, whether consciously and actively or unconsciously and in a "taken for granted" manner. It can be no other way as those factors are reflective of the human condition as such and human nature, no matter the postmodern and other initiatives to deny the existence of the latter.