Amazon.com Widgets

Sunday, January 20, 2008

From Red, White and Blue Tag Sale

Even as W. played cheerleader for Arab business, the Arabs were cleaning our clocks — then buying them. Our addiction to oil has allowed our pushers in the Persian Gulf to go on a shopping spree to snap us up.

Hillary Clinton was right when she said it was "pathetic" that President Bush had to beg the Saudis to drop the price of oil.

One cascading rationale he offered for invading Iraq was the benign domino theory, that bringing democracy to Iraq would sway the autocrats in the region to be less repressive.

But when W. visited Saudi Arabia and Egypt last week, he did not have the whip hand. He could not demand anything of the autocrats in the way of more rights for women and dissidents, much less get the Saudis to help on oil production. He needs their help in corralling Iran, which has been puffed up by the occupation of Iraq.

So he was a supplicant in Saudi Arabia. The American economy is a supplicant, too.

Two decades ago, we fretted that Japan was taking over America when Sony bought Columbia Pictures and Mitsubishi bought a chunk of Rockefeller Center. But they overpaid for everything.

Now, because of Wall Street’s overreaching, our economy depends on foreign oil and foreign loans to stay afloat.

China and Arab countries have a staggering amount of treasury securities. And the oil-rich countries are sitting on so many petrodollars that they are looking beyond prestige hotels and fashion labels and taking advantage of the fire sale to buy eye-popping stakes in our major financial institutions...

When the president got back Thursday night from a trip that made it clear he has no clout overseas, he had to rush the ailing economy into intensive care.

The Left, the Right and everyone in between were disgusted by Bush's trip to Saudi Arabia. Everyone has complaints about where the economy is going. Should we be surprised that "change" is this campaign's buzzword?

2 Comments

"It's time for a ch-a-nge" was the slogan of the Clinton/Gore campaign in 1991.

But today, no one seems to spell out exactly WHAT they would do differently.

But today, no one seems to spell out exactly WHAT they would do differently

No, they don't, but at least some people out there realize that our generous friends in the Gulf aren't such good friends.

Of all the candidates, Hillary seems to be the one who is least likely to make any positive changes.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Search


Archives
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]