Wednesday, January 23, 2008
UNITED NATIONS -- Canada is poised to become the first country to significantly distance itself from a major anti-racism conference the United Nations is planning for next year.
Maxime Bernier, the Foreign Minister, is expected to announce as early as Wednesday Canada is dropping out of planning for the Durban II Conference, which the UN is billing as a global follow-up to its 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa.
Insiders say the government feels the new conference is shaping up to be like the anti-West and anti-Israel free-for-all that critics said the initial gathering quickly turned into.
But the move is bound to spark accusations Ottawa is not serious about combatting racism around the world...
Of course! After all, who could be against an "anti-racism" conference? Doesn't that mean you're all for racism? Well, no, of course not. Assuming a replay of the original Durban conference, the only thing better than staying away would be for Western nations and whatever others they can gather with them to stage a walk-out.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Canada expected to back out of UN racism conference.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-renamedtb.cgi/14035
1 Comment
Leave a comment to: Canada expected to back out of UN racism conference
Comment Info and Policy:
1) You must have Javascript enabled in your browser in order to comment (blame the spammers). If you don't know what that is, you're probably fine.
2) HTML is on, so basic html should work. Raw links will be made auto-clickable, too, so even if you don't know html you can just paste in the link and it should work fine. Keep the "http://" in it.
3) Comments are generally unmoderated, which means I don't necessarily agree with the tone and tenor of everything posted. In fact, sometimes people post things they don't really mean just to make other people look bad. The internet is an anonymous place for the most part. That said...
4) I welcome you to post here. I'd love to have your input, agree, disagree or just offer a different data point, really. If I didn't want any participation, I'd turn off comments. Be aware, however, that this blog and the comments section exist for my entertainment. Therefore, I reserve ALL RIGHTS here, including the right to remove any or all comments on nothing more than a whim. Please don't even bother complaining. I'm the one providing the space and the free news and thought buffet. I don't owe anyone anything.
Anyone who posts here will be treated as my guest. That means I'm happy to be polite as a default, but if anyone is rude to the host they'll be unceremoniously shown the door.
It may pay to recall a famous line from the Tom Selleck magnum opus, Mr. Baseball: "Jack-san, you want Yoji's advice about the babes, you come to Yoji with respect."
5) Enjoy your stay!
I have to admit - if this is true, I am pleasantly surprised.
The problem I see with a walk-out is the presence of NGOs. These are often agenda-driven and radicalized. I can just see the NGOs from the US - supporting and intensifying the anti-US, anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish positions of this hate-fest. I have to wonder what role these unelected groups should have in any such conference. In Durban 1 the NGO conference clearly overshadowed any official action.
It seems to me that it is the worst possible approach - one that gives an appearance of democracy while incorporating unaccountable, radicalized, even lunatic individuals and organizations as active pressure groups on the UN. This creates a situation that is profoundly anti-democratic and anti-rule of law. Instead, it creates some sort of back-door civil society bureaucracy that makes some organizations more equal than everyone else.
In the period leading up to Durban 1, a regional conference (held in Iran) excluded Jewish NGOs and Israel.
Oh yeah ... this was about ending racism. Silly me, expecting such a conference to have a problem with anti-Jewish racism.