Guardian editorial on Palestine Papers: Ideological Incitement

Robin Shepherd made a great observation about the Guardian Editorial on the Palestine Papers, one that we touched on in yesterday’s post The Guardian’s outrage over concessions relating to Jerusalem, and occupied territories, positions them closer to the views of Hamas than more moderate elements of Palestinian society.

Even if we are to accept that the selected Palestinian notes from their negotiations with Israel represent reality, and even if we are to suspend disbelief at Saeb Erekat’s claim that the concessions he was reportedly prepared to make made him “a joke to his wife”, we are still left with some questions:

Why would the Guardian characterize the flexibility necessary to achieve peace as evidence of “weakness” and “craven[ness]“?

Why would they dismiss, and even mock, the potential Palestinian state which was apparently being discussed – one which would address Israel’s security concerns – by characterizing the future nation as something approaching a vassal state, a “puppet”, and simply another form of Israeli “bondage”?

Finally, why would the Guardian view the failure of such talks – the offer which was ultimately rejected by Mahmoud Abbas – as evidence that any new talks should require a priori Israeli acceptance of absolutely nothing less than the exact 1967 borders – with no border compromises possible?

In other words, why does even the appearance of Palestinian flexibility on the final borders of a future Palestinian state outrage the Guardian editors so much?

Not content to merely cheer lead for the Palestinian side, and demonize Israel, they now seem to view their role as inciting the Palestinians to reject moderation and accommodation.

The Guardian editorial ends with a dire warning of what will result if their sage advice is not followed:

“The alternative is to allow the cancer of the existing one-state solution to grow and to prepare for the next war. No one will have to wait long for that.”

Photo accompanying Guardian “Palestine Papers” section

While the facts still show that it was the Palestinians who rejected a sovereign and contiguous state (with a capital in Jerusalem) 2008, in framing the compromises which may have been considered by the Palestinian leadership as a cowardly surrender to the cause, Guardian editors have now emboldened Hamas, and have abandoned even the pretense of advocating for peace.

Quite simply, they are playing with fire.

This entry was posted in Israel and tagged , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


  • Recent Comments

    • Marco Adewole in On Flags, Knees, and Patriots - "It's easy to say that the views of African Americans are just "in vogue" right now without the knowledge of..."
    • Dwight in On Flags, Knees, and Patriots - "You assert: "The flag as symbol and what it represents are above all." Can't I say that what it represents..."
    • Sam L. in Trump and the MSM’s Recruiting Drive for the Alt-Right - "I see Keith X. as the perfect person for DNC chairperchild. He's a great representative of what the Dems..."
    • Joanne in Bigot Toilets - "Wow! I don't know what made me try your URL again, especially given that the last time I tried it,..."
    • Martin Solomon in Bigot Toilets - "Thanks much. Good to see you around as well. "
  • Archives

  • Archives Prior to Jan. 16, 2011

    For all content prior to Jan. 16, 2011, including searches, head over to the archived site.

  • Subscribe to Solomonia for Free or Make a Donation

    Enter your email address for a daily digest of new posts:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

     Subscribe in a reader

    Do you enjoy this site? Would you like to see it continue? Running this site is not free, considering both internet costs and the costs of lost time and other opportunities. All good things eventually come to an end. Help encourage me to continue this good thing by making a contribution. Click the logo below to make a donation through PayPal. If you would prefer another method, please feel free to contact me. I thank you in advance.

  • Authors

  • Categories

  • Meta